Slashdot Mirror


Joss Whedon Back on TV

tokenhillbilly writes "Joss Whedon of 'Buffy' and 'Firefly' fame has signed on to do another TV series on Fox starring Eliza Dushku (Faith from 'Buffy'). The series is going to be called Dollhouse, and the story surrounds a group of people 'programmed' to do missions out of a sort of high-tech dorm. '[The series] follows a top-secret world of people programmed with different personalities, abilities and memories depending on their mission. After each assignment -- which can be physical, romantic or even illegal -- the characters have their memories wiped clean, and are sent back to a lab (dubbed the "Dollhouse"). [The] show centers on Dushku's character, Echo, as she slowly begins to develop some self-awareness, which impacts her missions.'"

48 of 289 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds somewhat like Gunslinger Girl. by Dorceon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If the opening is "The Light Before We Land" by The Delgados I'm totally calling foul.

    --
    What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
    1. Re:Sounds somewhat like Gunslinger Girl. by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More Nikita than Alias.

  2. Watch out for episode 3 by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    In episode 3 Echo downloads a music track and spends the rest of the episode evading the RIAA.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Watch out for episode 3 by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      > In episode 3 Echo downloads a music track and spends the rest of the episode evading the RIAA.

      For bonus points, the track is "Still Alive", but because this is a Joss Whedon series, there's at least one invocation of Rule 34 with "Eliza Dushku, the Companion Cube, and the Portal Gun".

  3. Not wanting to be overly cynical by fictionpuss · · Score: 5, Funny

    But how many episodes before this invariably gets canceled?

    1. Re:Not wanting to be overly cynical by Sancho · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here's my rant on this one.

      --snip--
      The show, however, is going to be on Fox. And Fox has a history of screwing up. A list of my fears:
      - The show is called Dollhouse. No one who will be interested in the show is going to see it in their cablebox guide, wonder what it is, turn it on, and get hooked. The people who are going to turn it on and get hooked are 8 year old girls and soccer moms. And maybe people who saw Welcome to the Dollhouse. This means that the show must rely entirely on promotions and word-of-mouth.
      - Fox tends to under-promote shows. Fox also tends to move new shows to new timeslots constantly in an effort either to mitigate the damage of an apparently failing show, or to try to get new viewers. Neither of these is good for shows.
      - Fox tends to stick genre shows in a dead time slot. Friday nights at 8 is the norm for sci-fi. Every time it happens, I visualize an executive at Fox saying, "Hey, this is a show for geeks. Geeks have nothing better to do on a Friday night than to watch TV. Let's not clutter up the schedule by putting this somewhere where it might get a wider audience, let's just toss it on Friday." They also forget that geeks tend to DVR shows or buy them on iTunes/Unbox/Video-Site-du-Jour. This is a deadly combination that leads to devastating viewership when combined with a crappy rating system like Nielson.
      - It's Joss Whedon and Tim Minnear. They are cursed when it comes to Fox.
      - It's Joss Whedon. He commands a fairly high salary, and Dushku probably does too. The show sounds like it's going to be rampant with special effects and stunt work. This means it's going to be way more expensive than your typical hour-long drama, much less a reality show that could fill the same spot and rake in tons more money.
      - Did I mention that it's called Dollhouse?
      --snip--

      I'm wary of this one. Joss tends to have good writing, even if you don't care for the content itself. He's smart, snappy, and witty. But there's a lot going against this show, and I'm not sure it's going to last much longer than the last Tim Minear project on Fox.

  4. Another show about some "company" by aquaepulse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I realize that serialized mystery/thriller/drama shows are all the rage (Lost, Prison Break, Life, Heroes). But its getting outrageous. How many malevolent companies/groups/governments/cabals can we be expected to tolerate.

    1. Re:Another show about some "company" by SydShamino · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How many malevolent companies/groups/governments/cabals can we be expected to tolerate.

      Given how many we tolerate in Real Life, I expect we'll tolerate a bunch more of them on TV.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  5. Just extrapolate by benhocking · · Score: 4, Funny

    First data point: Buffy
    Second data point: Firefly
    ...
    ...extrapolating...
    ...
    This show has already been canceled.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Just extrapolate by Belgand · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So is it also the same (as far as personnel go) as it was when they canceled Arrested Development in spite of it's many, many Emmys?

      Even with Firefly they only showed about seven episodes, out-of-order, and crushed it. They also canceled Family Guy, Futurama... need I go on?

      Fox is just plain notorious for canceling excellent shows with a strong fanbase. I'd think that after his terrible treatment last time he'd know better than to even consider working with them. Go to somebody like the CW who at least let Buffy run for a damn long time and are desperate enough for something good to keep them afloat.

      What also isn't going to help it is the name. Much like Firefly/Serenity had a name that made a lot of sense to you if you already knew the story this promises to be a case where only fans will understand the name. Everyone else will likely not be interested in the program based on the name alone and will avoid it. I mean, if I didn't already know the reasoning and that Joss was behind it I'd probably have little to no interest in a show called "Dollhouse". Hell, I'd probably assume it was some lame new reality show.

    2. Re:Just extrapolate by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't really know what to say about Family Guy, I have no idea why they cancelled that

      Because it's the same five unfunny jokes over, and over, and over again.

      , though they did bring it back Unfortunately.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  6. Glad to see Whedon is doing something new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's refreshing to see a new series by Joss where the main character is not a girl with superhuman martial art abilities taking on nearly unsurmountable tasks while not being aware of the subtle manipulations of an unknown dark and nefarious nemesis.... Oh wait.

    1. Re:Glad to see Whedon is doing something new... by IronChef · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ack, why Faith? There's good slutty, and there's bad slutty...

  7. Oh not you don't , asshole by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am NOT going to watch another show just to see the best, most clever, smartest and funniest person die.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  8. SPOILER for Buffy Finale by AceCaseOR · · Score: 4, Funny

    You mean Anya, right?

    --
    Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
  9. Re:Joss Whedon and Fox by owlnation · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He did. But the difference here is that Eliza has the deal with Fox, and she's hired him (and Tim Minear). At least they have 7 episodes guaranteed. It's more than Drive ever got.

  10. Re:Joss Whedon and Fox by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just what I was thinking. I like most of Whedon's projects, but the guy sure knows how to whine. I mean, I wish Firefly hadn't been canceled too, but c'mon, it cost a million bucks an episode to make and it was unpopular (until the DVDs came out AFTER it was canceled). They even sprang for a feature film, which in turn lost money... and Joss wouldn't stop talking to the press about how much it sucked working with Fox. Dude, they footed the bill! They risked a tens of millions of dollars on a feature film for a canceled TV show!

    I'm guessing there's a REASON that Whedon keeps coming back to Fox... and it's that despite all his complaints (many of which I'm sure are valid), they're the only ones with enough cash and enough interest to buy what he's selling.

  11. Sounds like Dark City by Khopesh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Uh, Alex Proyas (The Crow, I, Robot) did this in his 1998 movie Dark City ; an alien race constantly wipes the minds of their captive humans, reshuffling them in order to better understand the human concept of a soul (so that the dying alien race can learn this trait and perhaps evade their fate). The movie is one of my favorites, but I don't expect Dollhouse to be anything but drivel.

    --
    Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
  12. Re:Joss Whedon and Fox by jhw539 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Battered writer syndrome?

    I don't have much sympathy for him - his Buffy and Angel runs show the guy knows how to play the game. Even if Firefly was killed a few seasons early, Buffy was killed a few season late. He's not really a rube walking into Fox's spinning blades of ineptness.

  13. He's like an abused spouse by Steeltalon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sooner or later there needs to be an intervention and his friends and family need to tell him that, no matter what it says, Fox doesn't really love him.

    --
    Regards, Ian
    1. Re:He's like an abused spouse by unsigned+integer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fox: "Come on home baby. This time it will be different. We won't cancel you halfway this time. We'll change."

      Whedon: "I'm in a co-dependant relationship with Fox ... I have no choice but to go back, for the sake of the children."

    2. Re:He's like an abused spouse by Frogbert · · Score: 4, Funny

      Exactly, I fully believe that one could create a very successful company based solely on continuing production of the shows Fox cancels.

  14. Re:Joss Whedon and Fox by thittesd0375 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Or it was Universal that made the film and Fox had nothing to do with it.

  15. hybrid shows by fermion · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Although most writing is just rehashing of old ideas, only changing sets or characters, it seems that we are getting more straight hybrids, with little else change. For instance, the so-called bionic women seems more a hybrid of Alias and perhaps some young women show, maybe gilmore girls, though I realy don't know. No new writing, just put it in a blender.

    The sad thing is that really out there ideas, those that are not rehashes, are not popular. Stuff like Salvage I. I guess people want what they want. This show, however, seems like a surrender to the status quo. After years of trying to be out there, the show is a realization that money is only made when we give people what they want. Firefly made no sense, and was sci fi, so it was dropped, thought it was still more realistic than friends. Oh well, like goes on.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:hybrid shows by Yinepuhotep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only reason Firefly "made no sense" was because Fox aired the episodes out of order and didn't even bother to air the pilot until AFTER they had canceled the show. Imagine how much sense your favorite novel would make if the publisher had chopped it apart and shuffled the chapters before binding it, then printed the prologue at the END of the book.

      --
      Gun control: The belief that a woman, raped and strangled with her panties, is morally superior to a dead rapist.
  16. the future is now? by tabby · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm fairly certain something like this must already be happening. At least at my work. Its the only plausible explaination for people to constantly make the same bad decisions over & over again.

    --
    I've experiments to run, there is research to be done on the people who are still alive.
  17. Re:Let's hope it's cancelled after 15 eps by moderatorrater · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I disagree. I feel the last two seasons of Angel were the best. I never watched Buffy, but I feel that Firefly was as close to perfect as a show can be, and Serenity was pretty good for a man who's only ever done TV.

    Out of curiosity, what didn't you feel made sense about Serenity's conclusion? I thought it was good.

  18. Re:Let's hope it's cancelled after 15 eps by jpfed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Angel started awesome as well, but then went down the toilet. If you could bring yourself to watch the show after season four (which could be painful at times- Connor was very much Angel's Dawn), you would have been treated to some of the best that Joss has to offer. The last season of Angel was almost as good as the only season of Firefly. Wesley's arc throughout the whole series, and especially its culmination in the last season, was an excellent demonstration of what Joss can do if you give him enough time. I can only imagine what comparable achievements he could have reached if he had been given the opportunity with Firefly.
  19. Re:Not a troll by Phroggy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Buffy was painful, but funny enough that I enjoyed it anyway, and the crazy stuff they did (an episode without dialog, an episode without music, an episode with the dialog in Swedish, an Rodgers & Hammerstein style over-the-top musical, a dream sequence where a character is walking between sets in ways that seem impossible, killing a regular character in the middle of a season, introducing a new character who "had always been there" with no explanation whatsoever until several episodes later, etc. etc.) is what made me a big fan.

    Angel was just as painful, but tried to take itself way too seriously. Had good moments, but nothing that really hooked me. Firefly was brilliant.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  20. Hit and miss with me. by pavon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All his shit feels the same and looks the same I can't agree with this, as I have reacted differently to everything he has done. Roseanne, Buffy, and Firefly are each very different shows.

    I was always fairly indifferent to Roseanne, it was funny sometimes, and annoying sometimes, but for the most part didn't do much for me. But what people did like about it was that it was very down to earth and completely non-PC. Then you have Buffy, which was practically the opposite. The dialog, while often irreverent, was delivered in a very liberal-arts pseudo-intellectual manner, which I absolutely hated. And then he turns around and makes Firefly. I absolutely loved that show - the premise, the characters, the mix of comedy and emotion, everything.

    But most importantly, none of those shows were the standard run-of-the-mill sitcom - they all did something different, some of which I liked, some of which I didn't. My impression of Joss is that he is a good writer that takes risks, unlike most of the formulaic crap on TV. His type of writing will never appeal to everyone all the time, but the people who do like it *love* it. I'd much rather have more of that on television, and so I'm curious to see what he does with this new show.
  21. This sounds like All My Sins Remembered by Elfich47 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The series sounds like All My sins remembered by Joe Haldeman. An average citizen is conditioned through hypnotherapy to assume given roles for a time period until the mission is over. After that he returns to base, debriefs and is assigned another mission. Eventually the brain cannot take the strain of repeated wipes and reprogramming and by the end when he is not on mission he is a schizophrenic stew of previous programmed personalities (thus - All my sins remembered).

    --
    Architectural plans are like computer source code with a couple of differences: You only compile once.
  22. No extrapolation needed by fm6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You're making a joke (and not a bad one), but you pretty much describe what happened to Firefly. The decision to buy the show came from a top, but there was a huge faction at Fox that hated the idea of putting on an "anti-Star Trek" and did everything they could to sabotage it. These are your standard network suits who hate Science Fiction (especially "space opera") because it costs a lot to produce and only targets a narrow audience. They much prefer reality shows and sitcoms, which are cheap and popular.

    They did a lot of stuff that at the time I attributed to simple corporate ineptitude, like promoting the show with really badly designed web site, and putting out this really horrible souvenir poster (featuring a common housefly with a lightbulb up its ass!). Then they forced Whedon to water down the scripts, showed them out of order, and finally scheduled the premier on a night where it was sure to be delayed in many markets by late-running baseball games. I usually hate conspiracy theories (speaking as a former "conspirator") but here it's hard to avoid having one.

    On top of all that, Joss Whedon is notoriously bad at corporate politics. So yeah, it's quite possible that his new show has already been cancelled.

    1. Re:No extrapolation needed by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In my opinion, it is a problem of the target audience. Shows that appeal broadly to the lower half of the Gaussian (reality TV, Flava uv Luv, Faux News, etc.) aren't going to hook the upper half. Likewise, the cheap gimmicks used in easy advertising aren't going to motivate the upper half to buy much of anything - most of us just snicker at the commercials, if we watch them at all.

      This leads to a problem where the advertising can pay for the shows if the shows bring in people who can be suckered by the ads; and that in turn earns us garbage television and causes the occasional great show that pokes its head up above the water to have corporate reach over and push it right back under. They knew that show was popular with a significantly upscale audience, but they also knew that those people weren't supporting their advertisers.

      The only shows that make it that will have any appeal at all to the upper half will also have significant elements of dumbshittery to them so as to drag Joe Sixpack off the tailgate of his pickup long enough to watch. Hence the mixed bag that the Treks represent, the awesome badness of Dr Who and the Torchwood spinoff mixed with just-happen-to-be interesting ideas, and the dreary soap-opera fuckarosis of the current edition of Battlestar.

      Firefly, which I would rank as the best television series ever made by a huge margin, even went out of its way to include low-end social elements such as the cowboy ethos, highly imperfect and easily understandable characters (Jane, for instance) and a down-to-the-metal bucket of bolts kind of flying jalopy your average hick could understand and maintain (Kylie.) The beauty of those inclusions was that they actually fit in the universe painted for us; the tragedy was that the show just wasn't dumb enough. In fact, it wasn't dumb at all. And that, my slashy friends, means cancellation.

      So. What's Britney up to today? More collagen for her lips? Still being held at arm's length from her kids? Any more video of her trying to dance without any practice or coaching? Fascinating stuff. Just... fascinating. Cough. I think I'll fool with Guitar Hero III instead of watching the tube tonight. Again.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    2. Re:No extrapolation needed by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 3, Interesting


      Then they forced Whedon to water down the scripts, showed them out of order, and finally scheduled the premier on a night where it was sure to be delayed in many markets by late-running baseball games.



      I watched the series in the as-aired order (the fact that I never saw them when they were on the air is a different but very important point). I liked the "out of sequence" ordering. I had no problem jumping in to the action. Watching the fur fly... noticing that there were personal interactions between these characters... and wondering what the story was. By the time the two-part "original first episode" shows up in this sequence, I found it all a treat to finally get to see who and what these people were. I'm not so sure I would have been as interested if it started with character introductions first.

      Clearly there are a number of people who disagree - episode order always gets mentioned when bemoaning the failure of Firefly. Maybe its a matter of sensibilities and preference. I'm not so sure it was sabotage. At least on this point.
  23. Re:Let's hope it's cancelled after 15 eps by anagama · · Score: 2, Informative

    First of all, he had nothing to do with the original Buffy movie

    Writer.

    Don't get me wrong, I have the Buffy, Angel, and Firefly boxed sets and enjoy them all, but it is not accurate to say that Joss wasn't involved in the Buffy movie.
    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  24. Re:Not a troll by crabpeople · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes a teenage vampire, why wouldnt everyone like that?

    Serenity was good because it was libertarians in space. Buffy sucked balls because it wasnt true to the movie. I watched the first buffy episode but kristy swanson wasnt in it so who the hell cares. I mean they didnt even use donald sutherland! it was a big let down and I vowed never to watch it again.

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  25. Re:Joss Whedon and Fox by Scudsucker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wish Firefly hadn't been canceled too, but c'mon, it cost a million bucks an episode to make and it was unpopular

    Mmmm bullshit. You take a show that has to be watched in order, show it out of order, and constantly mess with the time slot, and it fails to pick up viewers? Who knew? The part that I don't understand is why greenlight the show and spend a bunch of money on it, only to deliberately run it into the ground so it gets canceled. Especially when they canceled Dark Angel because they wanted to use the money to make Firefly.

  26. Re:Let's hope it's cancelled after 15 eps by Nasarius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The last *two* seasons of Angel? Seriously? Season 4 turned Angel into The Connor Show, with that fucking annoying little brat ruining nearly every episode. Even the actor who played Connor was apparently sick of him, saying each episode was pretty much whine, beat up on Angel, whine some more, no character development. And then there was the annoying/fake Cordy, with the ickiness of Cordy/Connor.

    Season 5, though...wow. Spike, plus Amy Acker as Illyria, plus great plots. And probably one of the best season/series finales ever made.

    --
    LOAD "SIG",8,1
  27. Re:Bets on how long it lasts? by tm2b · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Nope.

    What Minear actually said was:

    If I end up being some little Americanized BBC, churning out limited series for DVD, and the people who employ me want to keep handing over 20 or 30 million dollars for me to do that, then I'll be perfectly content.
    Gotta respect a man who makes the best out his reality.
    --
    "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
  28. Re:Let me guess by Toonol · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's funny that he's being accused of blatantly copying the show's premise, yet nobody seems to agree who he's ripping off:

    Gunslinger Girls
    Dark City
    All My Sins Remembered
    Joe 90
    AphroditeX
    Neuromancer

    Did all of those shows rip off each other?

  29. Hopefully... by Cervantes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hopefully, this is part of some backroom deal so Joss can secure the rights to Firefly (which expire at the end of this year).

    Because, otherwise... Joss, buddy, what the hell? You're like a hooker who keeps going back to her abusive pimp for another shot. What's next, you'll add a secondary character for Nathan Fillion, just to ensure that Fox will cancel it?

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  30. Re:Let's hope it's cancelled after 15 eps by RedWizzard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://imdb.com/name/nm0923736/otherworks
    Though that says he wrote an unused draft, many of his lines appeared in the film, e.g. "Do you know what happens to a toad when it gets struck by lightning?" Whedon claims only two lines were used from his script and the "lightning" line was not intended to have the style of delivery that it ended up with.
  31. It's time to play the music... by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Informative

    Angel was just as painful, but tried to take itself way too seriously. Too seriously? Smile time!
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  32. SPOILER for Serenity now by roystgnr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is just speaking for myself, but that ending was one of the very few times I've truly felt fear and suspense in an action movie. The standard trope goes something like: "Every one of Our Heroes is in mortal peril, and maybe the show plays it up by killing a Red Shirt, but you know that nobody you care about is going to bite it because they've got to be here for the next episode." Serenity was: "One fantastic character was actually killed, now another one's killed... dear God, this 'everybody might die' scene might actually end with everybody dying!"

    If there had been a serious chance at bringing Firefly back to TV then I wouldn't think losing Book and Wash was worth the loss of Book and Wash, but for the movie's sake it was the right artistic choice to make.

  33. fuck Nielsen by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just what I was thinking. I like most of Whedon's projects, but the guy sure knows how to whine. I mean, I wish Firefly hadn't been canceled too, but c'mon, it cost a million bucks an episode to make and it was unpopular It wasn't unpopular, it wasn't aired when it was supposed to.
    "Firefly, fridays at 8", nope, it's baseball. Worse, it's baseball with an ad at 8:15 for firefly at 8. I kept fox on mute all night while I surfed the web... you know when firefly came on? Me neither, but it was after midnight, because I checked at midnight, and at around 12:10 I realized it was on.
    The next week, it wasn't on yet at 12:10, but it came on later (mute, web).
    They claim they canceled it because it got bad ratings, but they killed it. On purpose (showed the episodes out of order, including "to be continued" episodes, aired the first episode last, skipped weeks, changed the airtime without any notice, etc.).
    So fuck you and your willingness to accept the official story, hook, line and sinker.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  34. Why he may have gone back by cybergremlin · · Score: 2, Informative

    If I remember correctly (say a 50/50 chance at best) Joss had signed a development deal with Fox and owed them 2 more series after Firefly. If so then if he wanted to do TV he might have to go back to FOX (right of first refusal perhaps).

    Yes he does have good reson to be wary. They put his baby in the Fri-8pm time slot of death, showed it out of order, pre empted or moved it so often you never know when it was on, then canned it.

    Fox has earned a reputation for quickly canceling genre shows. A lot of this seems to stem from a tendancy to greenlight plenty of unusual fare and then cancel it if it does not expode quikly, both the good (Firefly, Brimstone) and the "what were they thinking?" (Drive, lots of things no one remembers). Throw everything at the wall and see what sticks.

    Of course with the writers stike everything is on hold, and after the colapse of "Heros" clones it may never see daylight at all.

  35. Re:Not a troll by Belacgod · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bah, the movie was grade-b classic camp. The show was a completely different genre. If the show had a different name nobody would even connect the two at all.

  36. Re:Let me guess by lennier1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dont forget "Universal Soldier".