Slashdot Mirror


Major Breakthrough in Direct Neural Interface

jd writes "In a major breakthrough, neurologists are reporting that they can decypher neurological impulses into speech with an 80% accuracy. A paralyzed man who is incapable of speech has electrodes implanted in his brain which detect the electrical pulses in the brain relating to speech. These signals are then fed into computers which covert these pulses into signals suitable for speech synthesis. As a biotech marvel, this is astonishing. Depending on the rate of development it is possible to imagine Professor Hawking migrating to this, as it would be immune to any further loss of body movement and would vastly accelerate his ability to talk. On the flip-side, direct brain I/O is also a major step towards William Gibson's Neuromancer and other cyberpunk dark futures."

10 of 308 comments (clear)

  1. what if by rucs_hack · · Score: 5, Funny

    The subject turns out to have Tourettes syndrome?

    OI! [redacted] will you [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] make me a [redacted][redacted][redacted] cup of [redacted] coffee?

    Brain obscenity filters for teh wins....

  2. What drives modern science? by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 5, Funny

    What drives the advances of the last couple decades?

    Two desires:

    1. To restore Stephen Hawking's physical body to its former fully-functional form.

    2. To turn Stephen Hawking into a mobile, indestructible cyborg of incomprehensible power.

  3. Wait-- they haven't actually done this yet by raddan · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Read carefully

    Although the data is still being analysed, researchers at Boston University believe they can correctly identify the sound Mr Ramsay's brain is imagining some 80% of the time.

    In the next few weeks, a computer will start the task of translating his thoughts into sounds.

    "We hope it will be a breakthrough," says Joe Wright of Neural Signals, which has helped develop the technology. While this is indeed promising, and I hope that this 'unlocks' this poor fellow, this 'unlocking' has not happened yet. Hopefully, when they are able to decipher these signals, he's not saying, "Kill me" over and over again.
  4. Re:What? by klenwell · · Score: 5, Informative

    I believe Antonio Damasio addresses this question in one of his books. Apparently, a fortunate side-effect of this condition is it impairs the part of your brain that would normally find this horrific and intolerable and leaves you with a weird sense of acceptance and well-being (IIRC). Otherwise, I guess you just blink a lot and hope they keep the feeding tube hooked up.

    --
    Innovation makes enemies of all those who prospered under the old regime... -- Machiavelli
  5. Sadly more likely... by nick_davison · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My wife was in a massive car accident, a decade ago. She was in a coma for a month, suffered brain injuries, a collapsed lung, shattered arm, cracked eye socket, multiply broken jaw, etc. A national merit scholarship winner before the accident, her parents were told that, if she survived, she'd likely never walk much or be able to look after herself again.

    As it happened, she was sufficiently beaten up at the time that she had no concept of how bad her injuries were. She got out of the wheelchair simply because it frustrated her. She went back to working part time simply because she didn't realize she wasn't supposed to be able to. By the time she comprehended what had happened, she'd improved enough that setting impossible goals like "become a personal trainer" weren't quite so impossible. We taught her to read again (yes, even that got messed up) and even managed to get her back in to school - initially only able to pull a 2.0 average but improved each semester.

    In her case, she had an amazing recovery. Yet she, herself, says, "If I'm ever like that again, turn me off." She didn't realize how hurt she was and got lucky with recovering before she did. Understanding now, she has absolutely no desire to try that fight again. She'd rather just call it a day.

    So, sadly, there's a real likelihood that his first words, upon realizing he can finally communicate, after years of being unable to and stuck in a totally paralyzed body, will be, "Kill me." Probably not ideal to have the family in the room for.

    And yes, that entire story was just so I could "drop" that I have a wife in a slashdot post. Cunning, huh?

    1. Re:Sadly more likely... by tjstork · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And yes, that entire story was just so I could "drop" that I have a wife in a slashdot post. Cunning, huh?

      Your wife's recovery and you staying with her, through all of that, is the most poignant thing I have read on Slashdot, ever.

      A story like yours deserves to be told, and demands that we listen.

      May the winds always be at your back.

      --
      This is my sig.
  6. Re:Really accurate? by sorak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Many people who are unable to speak are able to communicate in some other way (usually, some form of gesture, whether sign language, nodding, blinking, whatever.) It doesn't take a much to be able to indicate "right" or "wrong".

    Remember, it's only 80% accurate. It may be more like "rigm!" or "prong!"

  7. Re:Slashdot. by Lord+Ender · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Judeo-Christian values were at the core
    If, by "Judeo-Christian," you mean "Western," then you are right.

    The majority of Western values do not trace their roots to any of the Middle Eastern religions. They come from other places, such as Greek philosophers.

    In fact, the philosophical foundations of the US are in many ways opposite to the so-called Christian values. Cruel and unusual punishment, for example, is condoned--actually commanded--by the Christian god. Slavery, and the belief that all men are NOT created equal, is a common theme in the Bible.

    The statesmen/philosophers who founded this country may have been Christian, but the documents they wrote to found this country were quite the opposite.
    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  8. Re:Really accurate? by skoaldipper · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have time to kill on lunch. Let's see...

    Right Wrong = 10 letters.

    P in Prong = 1
    M in rigm = 1 (+1 letter missing)
    1 missing = 1/2

    So, (10 - 2.5)/10 = 0.75 ~ 80%

    Your post above not only meets funny standards, but accolades for careful thought in using relevant and accurate choice of words. Well done, sir, well done!

    --
    I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
  9. Re:Really accurate? by fbjon · · Score: 5, Funny
    Reportedly, the first words spoken through this interface were:


    "Frist wrods!!"

    --
    True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.