Slashdot Mirror


Amazon's Kindle Sells Out In 5.5 Hours

necro81 writes "As reported on Engadget, Amazon's Kindle e-book reader has sold out. Charlie Rose's interview with Jeff Bezos reveals that the Kindle sold out within just 5-1/2 hours of going on sale. Amazon hasn't revealed how many it had in stock at launch, so it may just be that they didn't anticipate early demand. A check of the Kindle's product page shows that more will be rolling out starting December 3rd." Wired also has a brief head-to-head of the more prominent ebook readers and PCWorld has a review of the new gadget from Amazon.

19 of 417 comments (clear)

  1. Low production run? by Jackdaw+Rookery · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder how many units were made available.

    I somehow doubt it is a case of 'we made lots, but demand outstripped supply'. More likely this was a limited production run to test the waters.

    1. Re:Low production run? by dbolger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Call me a cynic, but I'd say its more likely a case of a limited production run so they can get sites like Slashdot to report how they sold out in just 5.5 hours.

    2. Re:Low production run? by catwh0re · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I suspect you are correct. I don't mean to throw water over this alluring tech toy. However possessing an 800x600 resolution screen on a device who's primary purpose is for reading is an obvious oversight. When screen resolutions are dense enough to render serif typefaces without hinting; only then will we have a device that can be often read without eye strain.

      Also while there are many people who don't read books regularly, the people that do usually appreciate owning a bookshelf of their favourite novels. I feel it'll make a great reference device for things like dictionaries, encyclopedias and newspapers.

      My last point is that when reading a novel, the reader is usually put into a deeper level of thinking which is annoying to be pulled out from. I'm curious if the device has a trivial way to flip pages that doesn't require the user to mentally escape the novel everytime they want to turn the page. (Or other annoyances like being told they have new email mid-reading.)

    3. Re:Low production run? by yakumo.unr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd reserve judgement till you'd personally experienced an 800x600 eInk display really (such as the one Kimble uses), it's considerably different to any LCD/CRT with regards to eyestrain, how your eyes will perceive the resolution.

  2. Weird behavior between pages by Besna · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Sony reader had a long latency to flip a page, as well as some stuff going on with the ink rearranging itself. If one could just flip fast without any image artifacts, it would be great. Most people will want color, but I think this is more important.

  3. That's OK by jc42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let the Early Adopters try it out and send in the bug reports. In a year or so, there'll be a version 1.1 that doesn't have as many annoying misfeatures as 1.0.

    There's an old rule in the computer biz: Don't ever buy anything whose version number ends with an even digit.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  4. Two Things by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. There are always a number of people with "state-of-the-art-addiction" who must have the hot new gadget.

    2. There are always people looking to profit from the above people, who jump on these product launches to then turn around and sell the product on Ebay.

    Beyond that I wouldn't read too much into this just yet. The Kindle may be a success, or a flop. All we know is that it a newly hyped gadget that sold out at launch, like most new hot gadgets.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  5. Front Page of Amazon by phantomcircuit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well yeah it was the front page of amazon, yeah the entire front page.

    Basically the best advertising that any device could have.

  6. Re:DRM Suckage by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No. E-Books has been buried for long enough. It is time to accept this technology into our lives.

    Crack it.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  7. Looks good, but.... by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Looks good, but it's way overpriced.

    Either have cheap books or a cheap gadget, not both.

    --
    No sig today...
  8. Re:Reading an LCD by Stochastism · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The e-ink is the only thing going for this critter of a device. The old saying "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" comes to mind. Books are:
    • Proven: they have a 600 year history of mass production.
    • Robust: at worst, they fall apart after 20 years or two toddlers.
    • Reliable: the words don't dissapear if it gets too hot/cold/wet/dry or an EMP event occurs.
    • Archival attributes: we will still be able to read in 100 years, but we might not be able to open DRM protected files.
    • Portable: they are more pocket sized than Kindle.
    • Batteries not included: because you don't need any.
    • Transferable: they have resale value including content... legally.
    • High contrast: higher even than e-ink.
    • Flammability: despite the name, Kindle's probably don't burn well. A definite negative for the Puritan at heart.
    • Light weight: unless you get the hard-back edition.
    • Accessible: they don't require a network-connection, so they work all over the world.
  9. Re:Reading an LCD by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So... you're saying that a book has all the advantages of an abacus?

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  10. At first I was ready to buy... by SageMusings · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At first I was ready to buy the thing. It seemed wonderful with a long battery life, the ability to purchase books right from the device, and Wikipedia all the time. Then I noticed the price...what a shock.

    I think I would have paid up to $125, as I still need to actually buy books to read on it. But $400? Either the device is expensive to make or the market researchers grossly over estimated the publics need for such a device. $400 buys some really nice toys, much nicer than a e-book reader. I think I'm going to spend my money elsewhere this holiday season.

    What a shame, too. I would really like to own one when they become reasonably priced.

    --
    -- Posted from my parent's basement
  11. Re:I was interested until by megaditto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can even have Amazon convert them to its special format for free, email the doc back to you... Like it's so damn hard for them to release a generic txt or pdf reader, right?

    What's with these companies and "special" lockins? Why do they crave control over items they sell so much?
    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  12. Re:DRM Suckage by jmorris42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > Crack it.

    Why? It is a joke. The BOM on the thing would run you less than $200 quantity one and I seriously doubt Amazon paid $100. Most of the sticker price is an all up front subscription to their cellular based wireless network that probably isn't even available out here in flyover country where I live. So if yuu don't value the handcuffs to the Amazon Store that why would you bother buying one just to hack it?

    No, we need to design our own. There ain't squat in one hardware wise. No wireless (eats battery like crazy) and two SD slots (for easy copy action!) along with the ability to read PDF files. But first e-paper tech needs to finish developing. Current incarnations lack the resolution of a cheap laser printer, to say nothing of commercial printing and the screen refresh speeds blow goats. And color would really be helpful along with a touchscreen UI.

    But like all things tech these issues will be solved after enough early adopters with big wallets and small brains spend insane amounts of cash on not ready for prime time hardware that won't even be compatible with whatever ends up becoming the standard. Then I'll buy one. :)

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  13. Amazon's market: Segway-riding idiots by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Too rich for their own good, money to burn, since to own this device, you would already have a laptop, an ipod, a cell phone, digital camera, etc. etc. If you have the money to fork over $400 for a device less useful than just about everything else on the market, you probably own a Segway.

    Not to say that its not nice being rich, but you're also an idiot since this overpriced, semi-useful device is full of DRM and all your books will likely be gone as soon as amazon decides to discontinue it or not to support the old form of DRM with their new model.

    But hey, if you're both rich and dumb, its perfect for you. Maybe someone will invent a clip to attach it to your Segway so you can read while you ride.

    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

  14. Bogus Cynic by fm6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Call me a cynic,
    You're a cynic. No, wait, you're not. You're just stuck in the usual conspiracy mindset, combined with the also-usual ignorance of economics.

    When you manufacture a mass market item, you're not in a position to say, "Let's just make 100 of them for our first manufacturing run, so we can boast that it sold out in a few hours." There's a fixed cost to starting up and shutting down a manufacturing line, and that means there's a minimum number of items you have to make if you want to make them at a reasonable cost. If you shut down the run before you reach that point, you end up saving little or no money.

    So what you do is make some kind of estimate as to how many you're likely to sell during an initial period. (Obviously, if that estimate is lower than the manufacturing minimum, you've got another Foleo on your hands.) That estimate has to be be pretty low for a new e-book reader, a product with a really dismal track record. It's probably not much more than the minimum manufacturing run.

    This device has some features that may or may not cause it to break away from the pack. The big one is that you don't need any kind of network access to download content; it has a built-in EVDO device that you can use without a monthly fee — network charges are included in the cost of the stuff you buy. (That's the main reason I considered buying one.) On the negative side, the thing's pretty expensive (the main reason I'm didn't) and a little bulky. In that kind of situation, the smart thing to do is do a short initial manufacturing run and see if the product develops a following. And in this case it has. Standard business practice, no Machiavellian scheming required.

    I have to say it again: we're all hi-tech geeks here, and hi-tech doesn't work without economies of scale. Yet nobody on Slashdot seems to grasp the concept. Pretty sad.
  15. I still say OLPC's XO laptop is better :) by timothy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More versatile, has a camera, reads a wider variety of formats. It's a (funny little, purpose-built, not-your-ordinary) *laptop*, but it has a book-reading mode and a 200dpi screen (in monochrome mode).

    A bit bigger than the Kindle, sure, but sure seems like the one I'd rather have in my backpack / fallout shelter / carry-on bag. After all, does the Kindle have a game pad? :)

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  16. Re:DRM Suckage by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Every email to the device costs $0.10; it's not free. (You can transfer documents for free to it via USB, I think, but this is a whole lot less convenient.)

    Also, keep in mind that when they say "lifetime free access to Wikipedia," they don't really mean your lifetime, or even their lifetime, but merely the lifetime of their business model. If at some point down the road these things stop making money for them, that cell connection is going to stop working, too. (And given the short lifespans of cell technologies, I wouldn't expect this thing to work with the cell network for more than a few years, a decade at most, before Sprint forces an upgrade to some new system. I have piles of old handsets sitting around my house as a testament to these forced upgrades that they push through every so often.)

    I think this thing is interesting, and it's the best effort at e-books so far, but it's still really, really bleeding edge. Personally I just can't justify shelling out four bills to be what seems suspiciously like a public beta.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."