iPhone--3G (duh). Hardware GPS. Flat headphone jack. Only ONE camera, facing front. Video conferencing, video recording. (More of a wish--actually, the same camera but w/ video recording and no conferencing). 16G, 32G--$399/$499, $100 rebate on both with activation. Battery life same, 10% weight reduction with some size reduction.
Religious rapture people are confused about what an atom is (water into wine?). Scientific rapture people are steeped in science. The religious people might as well be monkeys flinging poo--can we just ignore the flying poo?
Digital is not the end-all solution. Notice how your digital broadcasts take longer to change channels--deltas must be accumulated in the compressed stream. Notice how long your cellphone takes to connect. I like binary as much as the next geek, but I think the elegance of the bit can be slightly overrated.
Concealing the ideas does not make them less interesting or true. It does just the opposite--perhaps makes them seem more suspect. A sort of 'truth through obscurity' is no way to promote what you think is a reasonable worldview. Still, whatever is in those talks in dark rooms may be reasonable.
Psychiatry only deals with what is normal. Most religious people would be described of as normal according to DSM. This is despite believing in obviously inconsistent events. One who is schizophrenic does have real issues in occupation or social functioning (as the DSM specifies). A schizophrenic may still have a more accurate view of the world.
I've tried to take an objective look at Scientology. I am not a theist (atheist), but do think reincarnation is plausible. Something must be retained from death to birth, so that might as well be called a thetan. Much of the rest of Scientology seems like reasonable psychology as well--dualist, but without the supernatural. Certainly no obvious fairy tales, like Christian, Jewish, or Islamic miracles. I think the antagonism to psychiatry is the result of wanting to know what we don't yet--this aspect leads to unfortunate incidents such as this. If you strip away the secrecy and celebrity, there are some interesting ideas there.
As much as we all love Google, I think there needs to be a variety of search engines. Microsoft-Yahoo might have been a bigger player, but we'd lose the variety. Ask.com almost doesn't count.
The economic cycle of boom and bust is based on traditional theories of static job types. It does not take into account productivity. These auctions came out of thin air due to technology--the ability to squeeze far more into digital streams. Likewise, technology will raise the living standard of all. House crisis? Not when you have robotic builders.
As we keep hearing in other circles, "change" is in. As a software engineer who doesn't want to slow down for IT support, I have to do my own wrestling with the network. The more I can focus on the real job, the more productive I'll be.
Slashdot Mirror
iPhone--3G (duh). Hardware GPS. Flat headphone jack. Only ONE camera, facing front. Video conferencing, video recording. (More of a wish--actually, the same camera but w/ video recording and no conferencing). 16G, 32G--$399/$499, $100 rebate on both with activation. Battery life same, 10% weight reduction with some size reduction.
No other hardware.
SDK (duh). 3-5 game announcements.
Just don't use it. Barking may be useful for dogs, but we don't bark either.
Antimatter relates to electric charge. What you may be thinking is negative mass--which models predict to not exist.
Sort of like a perfect playoff run in the NBA. You can be for or against it--it will happen either way.
Religious rapture people are confused about what an atom is (water into wine?). Scientific rapture people are steeped in science. The religious people might as well be monkeys flinging poo--can we just ignore the flying poo?
It's as simple as that.
Even better than open office.
There is the NX bit, but you'd have to know about how far the buffer can overrun.
You wouldn't find this by static analysis. The constant in the key comparison is presumably fixed, but the variable "len" is not.
Facetious. To. The. Core.
Speaking of bots--this has to be one. The facetious bot?
3.5 mil democrats, 49.1% Obama, 48.2% Clinton. 2.2 mil Republicans, 70% McCain, 20% Huckster.
Please remember this.
Digital is not the end-all solution. Notice how your digital broadcasts take longer to change channels--deltas must be accumulated in the compressed stream. Notice how long your cellphone takes to connect. I like binary as much as the next geek, but I think the elegance of the bit can be slightly overrated.
Where does beer fit in here?
In jail you have health care, for example.
Epcot has some really cool stuff that would go great with this. "Spaceship Earth" and all that.
Concealing the ideas does not make them less interesting or true. It does just the opposite--perhaps makes them seem more suspect. A sort of 'truth through obscurity' is no way to promote what you think is a reasonable worldview. Still, whatever is in those talks in dark rooms may be reasonable.
Psychiatry only deals with what is normal. Most religious people would be described of as normal according to DSM. This is despite believing in obviously inconsistent events. One who is schizophrenic does have real issues in occupation or social functioning (as the DSM specifies). A schizophrenic may still have a more accurate view of the world.
I meant that it would follow from the plausible reasoning of reincarnation. Taken out of context, it seems like I'm asserting something that I am not.
I've tried to take an objective look at Scientology. I am not a theist (atheist), but do think reincarnation is plausible. Something must be retained from death to birth, so that might as well be called a thetan. Much of the rest of Scientology seems like reasonable psychology as well--dualist, but without the supernatural. Certainly no obvious fairy tales, like Christian, Jewish, or Islamic miracles. I think the antagonism to psychiatry is the result of wanting to know what we don't yet--this aspect leads to unfortunate incidents such as this. If you strip away the secrecy and celebrity, there are some interesting ideas there.
It's such bad fiction that it'll go away anyway.
As much as we all love Google, I think there needs to be a variety of search engines. Microsoft-Yahoo might have been a bigger player, but we'd lose the variety. Ask.com almost doesn't count.
The economic cycle of boom and bust is based on traditional theories of static job types. It does not take into account productivity. These auctions came out of thin air due to technology--the ability to squeeze far more into digital streams. Likewise, technology will raise the living standard of all. House crisis? Not when you have robotic builders.
As we keep hearing in other circles, "change" is in. As a software engineer who doesn't want to slow down for IT support, I have to do my own wrestling with the network. The more I can focus on the real job, the more productive I'll be.