Slashdot Mirror


Houston Police Test Unmanned Surveillance Aircraft

54mc writes "The Houston Police Department was filmed testing an unmanned aircraft in a secretive gathering on Wednesday. The media were not allowed into the event; however they were told that the aircraft would be used for 'mobility' and 'tactical' issues, and possibly even for writing traffic tickets. The aircraft has a wingspan of 10 feet and is said to cost from $30K to $1M. Pictures and video are available at the link." The article mentions that the craft was being operated by staff from a private firm called Insitu, Inc.. The device in the video looks like the firm's ScanEagle.

6 of 236 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I know the perfect defence by BlueMerle · · Score: 3, Informative

    Speeding is not the only traffic offence, and it is also one of the least likely to be dangerous.

    Disclaimer: I am a speeder. A safe speeder, though, who respects the weather, the vehicle's and road's capabilities, and other drivers.

    Emphasis Mine!

    You sir, are a fool and will kill someone some day! You're only fooling yourself!

  2. The price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Several posters have commented that the price spread is between 30k and 1 M. A quick visit to the company's web site makes it fairly clear that these drones come with a wide range of electronics. The more electronics you stuff into them, the more they cost.

    They've been making and selling these for years and know darn well what they cost.

    The company's capabilities are impressive. One of their first products flew across the Atlantic, in 27 hours using 1.5 gallons of gas. Any model plane builder I know would have real trouble doing the same. ;-)

    Several other posters have complained about the cost. A typical remark concerns how many traffic tickets it takes to pay for the drone. At 30k, the drone costs less than a fully equipped patrol car.

  3. Re:I know the perfect defence by Earered · · Score: 4, Informative

    Except that there is more accident on the autobahn without speed limits than on those with speed limits.
    There is roughly half of the autobahn with speed limits, and two third of the accident occurs in section with speed limits.[1]
    This has to be considered with knowing that the speed limits in place for the autobahn are in places supposed to be more dangerous.

    Also, variable speed limits are to be seriously considered with traffic (if you're alone, go ahead break the speed, when there is someone else, though it's a different matter).[2]

    What might spread the legend, is that highway in Europe (except maybe UK, and I do not know how it is for the rest of the world) are safer, in every possible ways (per road trip, per kilometer), than other roads (especially city roads).

    So an highway without speed limits, the autobahn, is safer than pretty much every other roads, except highway with speed limits.

    Though, be aware that even in Europe, the autobahn is often used as a point without mentioning its accident rate compared to other european highway with speed limits, but instead compared to the national rates.

    [1]http://www.guardian.co.uk/germany/article/0,,2201624,00.html
    [2]http://www.benefitcost.its.dot.gov/its/benecost.nsf/Print/5F01DD9F62A2282C8525733A006D4BEA

  4. Re:I know the perfect defence by Just+Another+Perl+Ha · · Score: 2, Informative

    Another thing is, if everyone is going 15 mph above the limit and there's one guy who insists on going exactly the limit, that person is creating a safety hazard as everyone tries to pass him. Which is ever so common if you've ever driven on a Houston freeway (just to bring things closer to being back on topic).
  5. Re:Tomorrow's tools of repression... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0721-10.htm

    Story from July 2005.

    Riot Control Ray Gun Causes Worry

    WASHINGTON -- Scientists are questioning the safety of a Star Wars-style riot control ray gun due to be deployed in Iraq next year.

    The Active Denial System weapon, classified as "less lethal" by the Pentagon, fires a 95-gigahertz microwave beam at rioters to cause heating and intolerable pain in less than five seconds.

    The idea is people caught in the beam will rapidly try to move out of it and therefore break up the crowd.

    But New Scientist magazine reported today that during tests carried out at Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico, participants playing the part of rioters were told to remove glasses and contact lenses to protect their eyes.

    In another test they were also told to remove metal objects like coins from their clothing to avoid local hot spots developing on their skin.

    "What happens if someone in a crowd is unable for whatever reason to move away from the beam," asked Neil Davison, coordinator of the non-lethal weapons research project at Britain's Bradford University.

    "How do you ensure that the dose doesn't cross the threshold for permanent damage? Does the weapon cut out to prevent overexposure?," he said.

    The magazine said a vehicle-mounted version of the weapon named Sheriff was scheduled for service in Iraq in 2006 and that US Marines and police were both working on portable versions.

    Talked about in 2005.
    Used in Iraq in 2006.
    In major news outlets in 2007. ..
    In U.S streets in 2008?

    Watch this space.

  6. Re:Nothing to read here ... by EricTheMad · · Score: 3, Informative

    If they're remote controlled, there's always the possibility that someone will usurp control and you might end up with this? The largest of the planes used in the September 11th attacks was a 767-223ER. It has a maximum takeoff weight of 395,000lb, cruises at 568mph, and can carry up to 24,000 gallons of fuel.

    The ScanEagle UAV has a maximum takeoff weight of 37.9lb, cruises at 56mph, and can carry up to 2 gallons of fuel. I think our buildings are safe.
    --
    -- Remember, we're not happy until you're not happy. -- Local FAA Inspector --