Slashdot Mirror


Child's Play Breaks a Million Bucks

Utoxin noted that Child's Play has raised the bar for their annual games for hospitals charity. They say "Not only did we break the million dollar mark, but we decimated it with our new total of $1,135,000! This significant achievement made this holiday season a happier, brighter one in our fifty partner hospitals. To everyone who has contributed to this amazing milestone, thank you! The hospital wish lists are still online, and some have seen new items added. While we try to get lots of new games and more to the children in time for the holidays, the hospitals have a need for equipment year-round. Likewise, we will continue to accept donations through Amazon, PayPal and the mail until next year's fundraiser kicks off."

57 of 81 comments (clear)

  1. What Are They Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It did better than that! It grossed $44 million world wide!

  2. decimated? by Swampash · · Score: 1

    It's like... donations made a quantum leap! What a sea change!

    1. Re:decimated? by kalidasa · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Decimated" means "killed every tenth," in other words, "lined everyone up and killed every tenth person in line." I suppose you could argue that $1M equals 90% of the actual total received, but I wouldn't use that particular metaphor myself.

    2. Re:decimated? by VirusEqualsVeryYes · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Decimated" means "killed every tenth," in other words, "lined everyone up and killed every tenth person in line."
      That's the ancient, root definition, referring to the killing of every one man in ten of a mutinous Roman legion. The current English definition has been generalized to the destruction of some percentage of something.

      But it's still inappropriately used in the summary. Commence the "!decimated" tagging...
    3. Re:decimated? by ubrgeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're absolutely correct. And now that you've also managed to raise $1,135,000 for charity, we're more than willing to use your definition of the word ...Oh, wait ...

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    4. Re:decimated? by petes_PoV · · Score: 1
      The current English definition has been generalized to the destruction of some percentage of something.

      Where that percentage is definitely not generalised, but is specifically 10 percent - i.e. decimate = reduce by one-tenth.

      You're right though, it is an inappropriate use of the word

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    5. Re:decimated? by mecenday · · Score: 1

      Since when does a word only take a single definition?

      I'd say it's similar to how "virus" is generalized to include "trojans" and "worms"... or how "hacker" is used for "cracker" in main-stream speech. I don't think it's really misuse to use them more generally, and I don't think people who distinguish the terms are just being pedantic jerks.

      When you use the more specific version, you are now into jargon territory. It helps you be more precise, but you have to realize that you've stepped outside general speech patterns.

      Don't write off context. It's almost always clear from context which sense is being used in a comment or discussion. As someone who knows the difference, it should be really easy for you. You don't have to point out the other usage every single time it's used in another way.

      --
      Tautologies, they are what they are.
    6. Re:decimated? by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      You don't have to point out the other usage every single time it's used in another way.

      But then how will the grammar nazis compensate for never touching a woman?

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    7. Re:decimated? by veganboyjosh · · Score: 2, Funny

      But then how will the grammar nazis compensate for never touching a woman?

      "But then how will the grammar nazis compensate for never having touched a woman?"

      Fixed that for ya...oh wait...

    8. Re:decimated? by Ninjaesque+One · · Score: 1

      Common use is the only way in which words are formed. Even a coinage depends on its common usage in order to flourish. Therefore, what you are suggesting to do(to reject common usage) is to stagnate our language, make it a breeding ground for foul things. Better to stir it a little, and at least enjoy it for the little while it lasts. The dictionary-makers define misused, as of a word, as a word said to be misused. If there is no intent to create a word or new meaning(since the old meaning is ancient, the new meaning middle-aged). The usage panel(66%) accepts the usage for people(Here), but not things. Yet in the thesaurus of that very same dictionary I linked to, the synonyms-- annihilate, etc-- are perfectly suitable for things. Why should not decimate expand its usage to things, then? The English language is plenty big enough, the countries with it plenty wide enough, to accommodate such a meaning. Do we use the word "myriad" to mean "10,000"? Does "inculcate" still mean "trample"? Words change.

      --
      Ninjas and pirates. How piquant.
    9. Re:decimated? by Wavicle · · Score: 1

      It is a foolish generalization, and decent-educated people ought to reject it.

      Yes, quite right.

      Now, why don't you take all this energy you have and go around shouting about how the word "gay" is misused to mean "homosexual."

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    10. Re:decimated? by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      It is a foolish generalization, and decent-educated people ought to reject it. It is "generalized" by ignorant people (like the guy in the article), who don't even realize, that the dec-prefix in this word is the same as in, for example, decade. And the same prefix as DECent, DECadent, DECaffeinated (ooops, the prefix is actualy de-), DECant, DECal, right? Er... except none of those use the dec- prefix, most (but not all) having de- prefix for negation -- which is actually not that far-fetched a misinterpretation of the etymology of 'decimate'. So get off your high horse.
  3. Wonderful by pedantic+bore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bravo! This kind of grass-roots charity warms my heart.

    If this sort of thing sounds good to you, check out Rotary International because they do this sort of thing, on a global basis, year round. There are plenty of other similar organizations; shop around to find one that works for you.

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
  4. Never makes mainstream news though.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ..because games are "murder simulators".

    I wished this kind of stuff made the news instead of the numerous violent video gamer portraits that are painted by TV and Paper news.

    1. Re:Never makes mainstream news though.. by LordHuggington · · Score: 1

      Color me the eternal optimist, but I would hope charities like this would at least help to reduce the witch hunt mentality a tiny bit from the mainstream media. The extreme anti-game types are pretty much set in their ways, but I think there are a lot of others who can be swayed not to write videogames off as big, bad killing simulators. The mainstream coverage of the Wii alone in 2007 put gaming in a more positive light this past year. As for Child's Play, I do believe they got a little bit of national attention when they started it up for this year's drive, so the media is at least showing a little bit of positive coverage in the industry.

    2. Re:Never makes mainstream news though.. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Presidential candidate Duncan Hunter has raised a million bucks too, and you've probably never heard of him from the mainstream news...

  5. Good Use of Power by RobBebop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I saw this on Penny Arcade the other day, and it is good to see that Tycho and Gabe have used the power of running a top ranked webpage for a greater social benefit.

    Kudos the them, and to everybody who enjoys successful and a love for charity.

    --
    Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    1. Re:Good Use of Power by vodevil · · Score: 1

      This is one of the few charities that I believe in supporting. This year, instead of giving gifts to my brothers and sisters, I made a donation to Child's Play. Next year, I think they can do even better.

  6. Re:Gabe by ceejayoz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I doubt that Child's Play is anything to Gabe but a chance for shameless self-promotion. Who gives a shit? Sick kids around the world got a million dollars worth of toys out of it.
  7. Re:Um. by GR|MLOCK · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You may want to look up the meaning of the word 'decimate' and consider how surpassing your goal by 10% is actually pretty close to the spirit of the word.

  8. Re:Gabe by revlayle · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hello??? HARLAN ELLISON! He totally owns everyone in the raging-prick-ego-maniac dept; Gabe had a small victory... but Harlan is still the world's biggest dick.

  9. Contributors by techpawn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does this count the donation that they made in Jack Thomson's name when he welshed on donating a large sum for making a violent video game to his specifications... Or was that last year?

    --
    Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
    1. Re:Contributors by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that was last year... and if I remember correctly, the donation was made to the ESA, so it won't count :)

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    2. Re:Contributors by nlitement · · Score: 1

      You should check this out.

  10. Re:Um. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    if 100,000$ isnt that much to you, id be happy to take it off your hands

  11. Re:Um. by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1, Funny

    Didn't the dollar drop by more than 10% in value in the last year?

    --
    I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
  12. I hope they can fix them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    A million dollars is going to take a lot of money to replace. Hopefully they'll be more careful next year.

  13. Re:Gabe by rhennigan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah this is exactly the type of thing pricks like Gabe do; help raise over a million dollars for sick children. What a prick...

  14. You people are sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Congratulations on putting murder simulators into the hands of our kids. I vow to put a stop to this! I won't rest until the people responsible are made to pay for their crimes.

    Regards,
    Jack Thompson

    P.S. Gabe and Tycho just threatened me.

    1. Re:You people are sick by Zibblsnrt · · Score: 1

      I know the AC here was posting in jest, but stuff like this has to annoy the hell out of the "gamers are bad!" crowd. Nothing like taking someone's neat little worldview and, to use an inappropriate metaphor given the subject, shooting it in both kneecaps; I can hear the cries of "this doesn't count!" from here. I kind of wonder if the low coverage this sort of thing gets is because people simply don't know about it, or because it would add uncomfortable nuance to the coverage of the whole video game issue.

      That probably goes double for Gabe and Tycho. Didn't they butt heads with Thompson sometime in the last year already? I seem to recall them donating $10,000 to some charity in his name because he refused to...

      --
      "All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
    2. Re:You people are sick by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that people like Thompson who are blindly opposed to videogames would go straight for Hitler and say something like, "Hitler made the trains run on time but that doesn't make his regime a good thing."

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
  15. Doctor Who got it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What's amusing is that when The Master orders the population be decimated, he then further explains that he wants one tenth of the population killed.

    1. Re:Doctor Who got it right by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      By the end of the universe, "decimate" has drifted in meaning to "cut into ten pieces".

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  16. Re:Um. by theantipop · · Score: 1

    Maybe, but it will buy just as many Nintendo DS games as last year.

  17. Re:Gabe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most charity is fundamentally egotistical in nature. In fact, most everything we do is egotistical, even stuff we think of as altruistic. We've just been taught that ego is shameful, and so we dress our actions up in language which hides the self-gratification.

    So, frankly, wanking Gabe's ego in exchange for coordinating the flow of $1m of toys and games to kids coping with chemo is a fair trade to me. Does mean I have to like the guy, or hang out with him on Friday night.

  18. Re:Gabe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Too bad Gabe is such a prick. ... I doubt that Child's Play is anything to Gabe but a chance for shameless self-promotion. If only the world was filled with such pricks.
  19. Re:Gabe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hehehe.

    From one of Isaac Asimov's books of humorous anecdotes.

    A long time ago at a science-fiction writer's convention a few authors were standing around talking when another author walked by. One author explained to the group, "That's the next Harlan Ellison." Whereupon another author said, "Should we kill him now?"

  20. Re:Um. by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Informative
    I wouldn't call 100,000 or so past their goal "decimating" anything

    To decimate is to reduce by one tenth. It was a punishment for mutinous units in the Roman army, where all the men would be lined up and every tenth man executed.

    Since their goal was 1,000,000, and they exceeded this by one tenth, their usage of the word 'decimated' is actually not too bad. All too often people use 'decimated' to mean 'completely destroyed', but at least here there's a factor of 0.1 involved.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  21. Re:Movies aren't what they used to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This from the person who used the name Peter Cooper.

  22. Child's Play: by TofuMatt · · Score: 1

    Proving, every year, that people who play GTA do more than just kill real people.

    --
    -Matthew Riley "TofuMatt" MacPherson
    I have a website
  23. Re:Um. by phoebusQ · · Score: 1

    Ego-stroking? You've got to be kidding me. It's more like feeling great about helping others. Did you donate?

  24. Re:Gabe by acvh · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Too bad Gabe is such a prick. Seriously, not since Theo DeRaadt has the world seen such a total asshole."

    Tycho, is that you? Harlan? DivX?

    so Gabe kicked your ass at Halo 3. get over it.

  25. Re:Gabe by pembo13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I do not have any idea the issue at hand here, I'm not a big fan of the ends justify the means.... children getting X amount of toys doesn't just make something okay.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  26. Re:Gabe by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

    I'm interested in knowing what possible damage the alleged shameless self-promotion has done to anyone that offsets the benefits Child's Play has brought.

    If Gabe were using it to get good PR after beating his wife to death or something, you might have had a point.

  27. Re:Gabe by pembo13 · · Score: 1

    Was speaking in general, know nothing about the alleged issue in this case.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  28. Re:Gabe by ashridah · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, I'm pretty sure Child's play was started after Jack Thompson started his raving about how games only create deviants, and the Penny-arcade people wanted to show him up in a way that was more constructive than responding directly to his infantile arguments.

    So far, Child's play has raised a huge amount of money, and helped make being hospitalized less sucky for lots of children, and given Gabe/Tycho a way to thumb their nose at Jack, which I'm all for. Not that it'll matter to Jack, mind you, since he's a raving lunatic, and incapable of dealing with rational arguments anyway.

    ash

  29. Re:I did my part by somedumbusername · · Score: 1

    Do let everyone know about it won't you?

  30. Re:Gabe by xant · · Score: 1

    Nah, it's actually Gabe himself, posting as Misfit.

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
  31. Re:Gabe by immcintosh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I do not have any idea the issue at hand here...
    Just stop right there. There is no "ends justify the means" here. This is a charity event. There is no evil ulterior motive that could make a difference. The ends and the means are the same--people are donating toys to sick children. They're not being robbed blind, this is a willing donation. While it's true that the success has been going to their heads a bit, it's not exactly surprising considering they just raised over a million dollars of charity with their pet project. I think any of us might be a bit arrogant about that fact too.

    As for the OP in this little thread... accusing somebody of being a raging egomaniac in comparison to Harlan Ellison is almost mind bogglingly ironic. If it's true this must have been a real case of unstoppable force meeting immovable object.
  32. Looks Right To Me by severoon · · Score: 1

    Well, if you consider the goal at $1M, they accomplished that goal and added $1 extra for every $10 of the goal. That's kinda like killing every tenth dollar in line. I admit, it's a stretch, but seems like an somewhat appropriate (though unintentional) usage to me. :-)

    --
    but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
  33. How about "obliterated"? by sosiosh · · Score: 1

    The reason "decimated" is the wrong word in this article is because there is a perfectly good, perfectly correct word to use. This word is "obliterated," and it means completely destroyed.

    1. Re:How about "obliterated"? by mecenday · · Score: 1

      ... and when people use "hacker" in the popular sense, there is a perfectly good, perfectly correct alternative in "cracker."

      I believe you missed my point.

      --
      Tautologies, they are what they are.
  34. Re:Um. by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    Seriously? Come on.

    The one day I don't have mod points. >100000K to be exact which meant > 10%.
    That's decimating a goal when it comes to raising money, and more so when your "reaching" for your goal.

    This isn't an investment, this is a charity any money raised is a good thing, and they deserve a little stroking.

    I say you lend em a hand...

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  35. Re:Gabe by ctd600ftlb · · Score: 1

    I believe Child's Play was created in response to this article - http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20031118/LIVING/311180742 At the bottom of the about page on Child's Play's site, the original PA news post, as well as the author's response is posted. The link to the original column doesn't work anymore, but I'm pretty sure that's the one. Apologies if this was posted elsewhere, I looked but didn't see it. And I'm on board with the opinion of if Gabe is aiming for some shameless self-promotion, that's perfectly fine with me. They've raised three million, maybe three and a half by now, for kids in children's hospitals in just five years, I think? Yeah, shameless self-promotion is alright with me.

  36. Re:Gabe by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

    That's just your sucky glass-half-empty attitude that tells you that.

    Egotistical people are gratified by helping themselves, non-egotistical people are gratified by helping others.

    People choose what they are gratified by--that's what makes them either selfish or selfless, not the fact that they end up gratified.


    I don't think this is actually an argument with what he's claiming. I think you're just agreeing with him from a different angle.
    --
    Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
  37. Oh... Child's Play by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 1

    And for a second I thought Chucky was back.

    --
    Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
  38. More games (not just gaming sites) should do this by bryanbrunton · · Score: 1

    I have a game that donates to charity, more precisely to Heifer International (www.heifer.org). In fact, as I have tired of programming the thing, the donation aspect is one of the main motivators for actually working on it.

    It is a clone of risk called Grand Strategy (www.denizengames.com).

    Our motto is: Good can come from global domination.