Slashdot Mirror


Introducing Magnet-Responsive Memory Foam

Roland Piquepaille writes "The U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) has recently reported that two research teams have developed a new porous foam of an alloy that changes shape when exposed to a magnetic field. The NSF states that this new material is able to remember its original shape after it's been deformed by a physical or magnetic force. This polycrystalline nickel-manganese-gallium alloy is potentially cheaper and lighter than other materials currently used in devices ranging from sonar to precision valves. It also could be used to design biomedical pumps without moving parts and even for space applications and automobiles."

69 comments

  1. Pumps with no moving parts? by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From the summary: "It also could be used to design biomedical pumps without moving parts"

    Well, such pumps do exist - you can pump liquid metals by passing a current through them, and applying a magnetic field at 90 degrees to the current as per high school physics - but I doubt they'll be pumping molten sodium through people any time soon. You could build a diaphragm pump with this approach, presumably using a two-phase magnetic circuit to very the length of the magnetic actuator, and this would probably be a lot better than passing airlines into people to operate conventional diaphragm pumps, as is done at present. But the pump has at least two moving parts, i.e. the actuator and the diaphragm.

    I suspect the author meant "no rotating parts".

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Pumps with no moving parts? by BigHungryJoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      applying a magnetic field at 90 degrees to the current as per high school physics

      you went to a much better high school than I did

    2. Re:Pumps with no moving parts? by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
      You never got to build a basic electric motor or put a bent wire carrying a current in a magnetic field?

      Sheesh, if that's the case it's not surprising there's a Republican presidential candidate who doesn't accept the idea of Evolution.

      --
      From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    3. Re:Pumps with no moving parts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many schools are a joke. I took a chemistry class without ever touching a beaker or burner, though the teacher used his own money to demonstrate some experiments in front of the class. In my introductory physical science we only did a few labs around density, displacement and basic measurements which all involved lead weights, flasks of water, balance beam scales and rulers. This was because my school, drowning in its own money and lacking common sense, threw out all its "antiquated" lab equipment to replace it with fancy scientific computer labs (never mind that the school already had two computer labs.) So my high school science education consisted of reading dry texts and filling in bubbles. I can say in all seriousness I was exposed to more scientific experimentation in elementary school than I was in high school. I never got to see the new setup, as I graduated before they finished it - I just pray that some kind of science is finally going on in those classrooms.

    4. Re:Pumps with no moving parts? by odourpreventer · · Score: 1

      Whether there are moving or rotating parts is not as interesting as whether there is wear, tear or fatigue. Pumps exist where the rotating parts are magnetically suspended and thus they can theoretically work forever. TFA doesn't mention any real life test, so in essence it's vapourware.

    5. Re:Pumps with no moving parts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I can think of a lot of better things to pass through people instead of airlines.

      Honestly, I can't imaging anything about an airline that would be good to put through a person. Not the planes themselves, the baggage handlers, the cleaning crews, pilots, "
      snacks and refreshments" or whatever passes for a "meal" on most flights, and not even the pilots. And forget the awful airline debt load.

      Flight attendants, maybe. Some of them are ok.

      Other than than, nope. I don't want an airline passing through me.

    6. Re:Pumps with no moving parts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the highlight of my high school physics class was watching ice cubes melt in a styrofoam cup. Seriously.

    7. Re:Pumps with no moving parts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "passing airlines into people"? Sounds painful, even if it were a small airline.

    8. Re:Pumps with no moving parts? by beckerist · · Score: 1

      Aw that sucks. I had an amazing physics class. I took it my junior year (everyone else was a senior) and as a result I actually went to college for physics. I had the type of teacher that would take the Van der Graaf generator and hook it to the doorknob. He'd turn it on when class started so that the jocks that always showed up late would get shocked trying the door. They always knocked after that!

      Oh, and one time a couple buddies of mine and I stole this machine out of his supply closet that could pump out thousands of dime-sized bubbles in minutes. The bubbles were perfectly buoyant in air (didn't rise or sink, just sat where you put them. Technically they rose very slowly but the air currents in the room generally moved them more.) We filled the room the night before our teachers birthday. Somehow, weeks later, he caught wind that it was us. He got a janitor to break into our lockers and completely filled them with confetti-style shredded paper (a PAIN to remove, there were still little static-clinging pieces floating around my locker through the end of the year.)

      Despite all the fun, we really did learn too!

    9. Re:Pumps with no moving parts? by Hucko · · Score: 1

      Now one can't do this kind of teaching in our schools. The curricula seems to be more like an English lesson than a science lesson let alone being something that inspires wonderment or encourage curiosity.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  2. this substance has been around since 1991 by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:this substance has been around since 1991 by owlstead · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't think the T-1000 was made of foam. It's been a while since I last saw the movie, but I cannot remember anything about a killer robot cuddling people to death.

  3. They forgot by Smordnys+s'regrepsA · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To mention that production of any theorized applications will take 5-10 years. Yeesh, the editors usually remember to add that bit of useless info when they add the useless list of possible uses!

    --
    Just -1, Troll talking to another.
  4. Fender Benders? by frinkacheese · · Score: 3, Funny

    This would be cool for bumpers (I think some of the colonies call them fenders). You could park your car, shunt the other card out of the way and then apply your magnetic field and say "Nar it wasn't me, mate. Look, my car is OK. Must have been some other bloke".

    1. Re:Fender Benders? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think some colonies would have said "man" instead of "mate", and "dude" instead of "bloke".

    2. Re:Fender Benders? by rrp · · Score: 1

      Fenders are the pieces that go around the wheels, while bumpers are what go in front and behind the car... even in the other "colonies"

    3. Re:Fender Benders? by User+956 · · Score: 1

      I think some colonies would have said "man" instead of "mate", and "dude" instead of "bloke".

      How many Boffins died to bring you that information?

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  5. Updated Memory Foam Mattress by orionop · · Score: 1

    I can see the commercials now...
    Introducing the Magnetic Memory Foam Mattress, molds to your body with adjustable magnetic fields.

    1. Re:Updated Memory Foam Mattress by Tim_sama · · Score: 0

      My upstairs neighbor had one of those beds, so I put a strong electromagnet on my ceiling rigged up to a pressure sensor under his bed, and use it to transform his mag-foam bed into a giant slingshot, which would fling him out of his bed every 30 seconds after he laid down. True story. *sip*

  6. Space Time Continium by Smordnys+s'regrepsA · · Score: 2, Insightful
    *ahem*

    a seemingly unstoppable cyborg assassin who has been sent back from the year 2029
    Just on track, I believe.
    --
    Just -1, Troll talking to another.
  7. Moving parts by michaelmalak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    biomedical pumps without moving partsThat should read "without rubbing parts". And even with that increased language precision, we still don't know the answer to the important question, which is whether this willow allow pumps "without fatiguing parts". (I suspect this will not be possible without biological-like microscopic self-healing.)

    1. Re:Moving parts by compumike · · Score: 4, Informative

      Correct. The big design concerns (and eventual failure points) in pumps, and even fans, are bearings and rotating seals. But there are already implantable heart pumps which rely on the principles of active magnetic levitation to remove the need for contact bearings. See this article for an example.

      --
      Coder? Want to learn electronics? Microcontroller kits.

  8. Obligatory Metal Gear Solid Remark... by FF8Jake · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Computer : PAL code number two confirmed. Awaiting PAL code number three.

    Snake : Okay, there goes PAL code number two. Next comes PAL number three... warm the key.

    (Snake Inputs the third PAL code.)

    Computer : PAL code number three confirmed. PAL code entry complete. Detonation code activated.

    Snake : No! Why!

    Computer : Ready for launch...

  9. prior art by User+956 · · Score: 1

    two research teams have developed a new porous foam of an alloy that changes shape when exposed to a magnetic field.

    That's nothing. I have stacks and stacks of disks with INFORMATION that changes shape when exposed to a magnetic field.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  10. Re:Wow. by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    Self wringing scrubbing sponges here we come!

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  11. Holy specious conclusions, Batman by heinousjay · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, heaven knows the US would be a better place if we all knew how to build motors. Then the Democrats would rule forever!

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    1. Re:Holy specious conclusions, Batman by rbanffy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The world would be a better place if people were given proper scientific education.

      You know... That where you observe facts, formulate hypotheses and try to invalidate them through experiments.

    2. Re:Holy specious conclusions, Batman by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I'd rather observer people, formulate a hypotheses to control them the try to force that belief onto everyone. Perhaps some all seeing father figure that judges you and threatens some kind of reward/punishment system that doesn't happen until after one dies. That way no one can prove otherwise.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  12. Polycrysta... by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

    ... liquid medal.

    1. Re:Polycrysta... by chuckymonkey · · Score: 1, Funny

      I applaud your mettle for using the word medal when you should have used metal. I love words, they're so much fun to play with...maybe I should get a pet.

      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
    2. Re:Polycrysta... by martin-boundary · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Never meddle with words, you'll just mottle the meanings, and model a schizophrenia attack.

  13. How about transport security implications... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if clothing can be "magneto-morphed" into medieval weaponry? For example, a pair of trousers and some dental floss could be transformed into a longbow (firing socks as arrows).

    1. Re:How about transport security implications... by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      For example, a pair of trousers and some dental floss could be transformed into a longbow (firing socks as arrows).
      You also need a Swiss Army knife and some duct tape...
      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:How about transport security implications... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Dental floss as the bow string? Puhleeze, if you got your arrow to fly a foot you'd be lucky. You really work too hard. How about magneto-morphing jacket-->katana/shurikens?* Bows (and other big, slow-to-reload projectile weapons) are pretty useless in crowded spaces anyways.

      *if you make an anime of that I'll claim intellectual property rights :P

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:How about transport security implications... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Just carry a gun, already. The odds that the bad guys are going to continue to lock you in the "assorted dangerous chemicals and useful tools room" without searching your pockets are pretty low. I recommend a P90, the clear plastic magazine looks really neat.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  14. Thanks for expanding my point by Kupfernigk · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It wasn't a jibe at Republicans. It was a jibe at a world in which the most advanced technological power can produce people who don't seem to have the least idea of the basis on which that power rests, and don't seem to care. It may be that if GWB had had a proper scientific education he might have tended to, say, believe the weapons inspectors and his own military rather than the spin merchants, though we can't be sure. It might be that he would, say, read Scientific American or National Geographic, and this would inspire him to leave a legacy of a serious attempt to solve world problems through the encouragement of science and technology

    I'd be almost equally happy if future politicians got a really good grounding in history, instead of being told that it is irrelevant.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Thanks for expanding my point by skoaldipper · · Score: 0

      a world in which the most advanced technological power can produce people who don't seem to have the least idea of the basis on which that power rests[...]It may be that if GWB had had a proper scientific education[...]I'd be almost equally happy if future politicians got a really good grounding in history
      Kupfernigk, you sure do speak in a lot in generalisms and random biased assumptions about other people. Is this the profound "scientific education" of which you speak?
      --
      I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
    2. Re:Thanks for expanding my point by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, if that's the case it's not surprising there's a Republican presidential candidate who doesn't accept the idea of Evolution. It wasn't a jibe at Republicans. Uh, yeah it was. Otherwise, you wouldn't have said, Republicans. Let's see what Bush has to say about whether evolution should be taught in schools:

      "Both sides ought to be properly taught . . . so people can understand what the debate is about," he said, according to an official transcript of the session. Bush added: "Part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought. . . . You're asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas, and the answer is yes." I guess if people want to see a view other than your own, then they must be wrong.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    3. Re:Thanks for expanding my point by Torvaun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have no issue with both sides being taught in schools, as long as we make sure that only the one that conforms to the scientific method gets called science. Intelligent design can go in a religion or philosophy class.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    4. Re:Thanks for expanding my point by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with religions being taught in schools, but only as far as they are no treated as science and only as long the curriculum provides an unbiased view of as many as possible different religions and compares their differences, similarities and explains why humans seem to feel the urge to try to understand the universe around them by resorting to supersti^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hreligious explanations.

    5. Re:Thanks for expanding my point by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      I was about to complain about a public school sponsoring a class on religion, but yours sounds sufficiently subversive that i think it would be beneficial. Good luck finding good teachers for it however.

    6. Re:Thanks for expanding my point by ArcherB · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have no issue with both sides being taught in schools, as long as we make sure that only the one that conforms to the scientific method gets called science. Intelligent design can go in a religion or philosophy class.

      I don't know if I would even go that far. All most Christians want is that the theory of evolution be taught as a theory. As a Christian student, evolution fascinated me. I always felt that a slow evolution of species was much more a miracle than God simply saying "let there be X... and there was". I always wanted to know what happened when (and before... God is timeless after all) God said what he said, and evolution provided that to me. But too many science teachers wannabe scientists (like here on /.) use evolutional theory as proof that God doesn't exist. I see it as proof that God DOES exist as the odds of each evolutionary step happening as it does are so slim to be qualified as a miracle, IMHO.

      So I have nothing against the theory of evolution being taught as long as it's taught as a theory. My reasoning for that is nothing religious, but because sometimes, science is wrong. Even Einstein rejected the idea of the "Big Bang" as he rejected the idea of an expanding universe. He told Georges Lemaître (a Catholic Priest, btw) "Your calculations are correct, but your grasp of physics is abominable.". Einstein, of course, had to revise his theories once Hubble proved that the Universe was expanding.

      My point is that science evolves just like anything else. What is "fact" today is backward-thinking-junk-science tomorrow. Science and religion are not mutually exclusive. Evolution has about as much to do with disproving religion as the Big Bang, and I don't want it being taught as such. Teaching Darwin is fine. Teaching Darwin as a counter to religion is just wrong.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    7. Re:Thanks for expanding my point by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I thoroughly enjoy being called subversive. :-)

    8. Re:Thanks for expanding my point by jsoderba · · Score: 1

      Have you actually seen this "Teaching Darwin as a counter to religion" happen? Because I don't think religion should be brought up at all in science class. Religion exists outside the context of empirical science.

      The reality is that high-school science teaching must happen within very tight time and money constraints. We can't present every crackpot notion because there is barely time to present the basics of the scientific consensus. As everything creationists say has been shown to be false time and time again, it would clearly be a waste of time to bring it up in class.

    9. Re:Thanks for expanding my point by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      I see it as proof that God DOES exist as the odds of each evolutionary step happening as it does are so slim to be qualified as a miracle, IMHO.

      This is a common misunderstanding. Looked at the same way, the various events you experienced since waking up this morning were all extremely unlikely, when you look at the details and not just the broad patterns. What are the odds, for example, that you would wake up the precise nanosecond that you did? However, none of the alternatives were significantly more likely, so the event was clearly not miraculous.

      Evolution is the same way. Looking back, the combination of events leading from non-living non-self-replicating molecules to humans seems extraordinarily unlikely, and yet at each step along the way what actually happened was not much less likely than any of the other things that might have happened. Even an event with only a one-in-a-million chance of occurring at any given time has about a 74% chance of happening given a million opportunities; given enough time, just about anything is likely to happen at least once. That this process eventually led to us rather than some other kind of organism is a matter of merest chance -- but why shouldn't it lead to us? We were no less likely a result than most other possible organisms, and rather more likely than some.

      Teaching Darwin is fine. Teaching Darwin as a counter to religion is just wrong.

      Evolution is not contrary to religion in general -- although it's definitely contrary to the Christian creation myths. Rather, it's simply one more area in which a religious explanation has been rendered unnecessary. However, as ways of seeking out truth, the scientific method -- the search for objective models of the observable universe which asymptotically approach the truth -- and adherence to non-verifiable, and thus subjective, religious ideology are necessarily in conflict with each other.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    10. Re:Thanks for expanding my point by sincewhen · · Score: 1
      Look, I don't normally reply to God-botherers, but I'm so sick of hearing such people saying "Well, science is allowed to be wrong and make mistakes, so I'm allowed to believe whatever I want without any proof." Which would be fine if they kept their stupidity to themselves, but then they have to start posting on the internets with "They should also teach God in science school because God invented science."

      I can't believe that people are that stupid.
      I just can't.

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
  15. Re:Offtopic: Roland by dbIII · · Score: 2, Informative
    He is in the habit of making grand world changing announcements that unfortuately are not true because either he completely misunderstood the subject matter or if he did get it right the world changed forty years ago. None of his mistakes have needed more than two fifteen year old first year University textbook to point out - one in introductory materials science and one in introductory thermodynamics. There was a linking issue and advertisements at the end of the link some time ago that annoyed people but he doesn't do it anymore.

    He's puts in a lot more effort than Dvorak but it's still annoying when a tech journalist gets things wildly wrong.

  16. Just what I always wanted by MindPrison · · Score: 1

    ...A giant fluffy USB-memory Pillow that can store my dreams!

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:Just what I always wanted by jmickle · · Score: 1

      hmmmmmmmmm agreed. anyone see the book 1984 by George Orwell coming to reality?

    2. Re:Just what I always wanted by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      I think perhaps you meant Brave New World...

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  17. Yeah boys we finally cracked iit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    We had some of this stuff at Roswell and it took us forever to find out how to make it ourselves. Those crafty alien bastards.


    MIB

  18. Hmmmm... by tgd · · Score: 3, Funny

    *notices banner ad for fleshlight*

    I may just have an idea here...

  19. Best tag: by Foolicious · · Score: 0

    "rolandagain"

    --
    Please don't use "umm" or "err" or "erm".
  20. Re:Wow. Roland Piquepaille submitted ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His firehose submission did link to his blog. That must have been "lost" at some stage...

  21. Nitpick: by Penguinisto · · Score: 1
    It's not merely "biomedical". The proper term to describe such pumps is Peristaltic. It has its uses in a wide variety of industrial applications as well.

    /P

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  22. Re:Wow. Roland Piquepaille submitted ... by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    maybe it's hi new year resolution not be be an annoying bellend.

  23. It could ... by MarkoNo5 · · Score: 1

    Sure. And we could use it in nuclear fusion reactors, flying cars, and holographic memory, and possibly even in Duke Nukem Forever ...

  24. car improvements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First cars get seatbelts to make wrecks safer,
    then airbags to make getting in a wreck fun,
    now cars get memory foam so you wreck, you didnt total your car, you just ahve to press the reset button, watch the car restruct itself from the ashes. we call this model Phoenix. this reconstuctive property became necessary upon giving it flying capabilities. we had to remove the flux capacitor to fit it all in though.

  25. Gentlemen...Behold! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The everlasting love doll!

  26. Believing spin merchants? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    No you have this the wrong way round. GWB already knew the outcome he wanted and the spin merchants were needed to create the supporting evidence.

    Unfortunately even National Geographic is far from being impartial and is heavily skewed in favor of pandering to patriotic or other themes. This is nothing new either: they were doing this during WW2 too.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  27. Transparent Version? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see some version of these electromagnetic "shape memory" materials in a cheap transparent form that can coat touchscreens. If they could be switched from smooth to a raised bump quickly, with very little power, and at high rez (about the size of a display pixel), they'd make for great feedback devices for "GUIs". Raised edges of GUI widgets, even vibrating areas indicating active buttons and their state. That would compensate quite a lot for how our fingers obscure the GUIs while we're operating them. And maybe even eliminate most of the need to actually even look at the GUI for most familiar interfaces.

    If this MRMF stuff can work in a thin enough coating, maybe it could be transparent. Or just some other transparent stuff that isn't as fancy, but just jumps on command without blocking the light.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Transparent Version? by socz · · Score: 0

      hmm now you got me thinking with your post. if it could be made transparent, it would really have many many useful applications. I agree that making a feedback-touchscreen would be great, but even for blind people this would be bad ass!

      I wonder what the limits of this are? Could it produce a 3-d imagine if it were on a monitor? that'd be bad ass too!

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
  28. Writing as someone who once did theology by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    Intelligent design does not belong in either a religion or a philosophy class. It's been exploded over and over again for hundreds of years because it creates an infinite regress (i.e. if a God designed the Universe, what designed the God? Clearly a bigger and better God who had to be able to design a God that could design the Universe. And what designed that God...as Hawking puts it, it's turtles all the way down). Theologians classify the "argument from design" as just one of about 7 flawed arguments for the existence of God.

    Quite irrelevantly and incidentally, this is my beef with current theoretical physics. It's substituting a defective theological argument (an infinite regress of universe constructors) with an argument that goes against Ockham's Razor (an infinity of parallel universes.) In a recent popular article on the subject I saw a suggestion that we can't see the additional dimensions because we are made of particles that are bound to only 4 of them. I am not a physicist, obviously, just a would be theologian who retrained as an engineer, but I'm beginning to suspect that String Theory is a religion, and should not be taught as science in schools.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."