Slashdot Mirror


Wonder Woman Gets a Woman's Point-of-View

theodp writes "Traditionally, comics have been by, for and about men. But more and more women are breaking into the traditional boys' club. Beginning with Wonder Woman #14, the superhero's tale is being told by Gail Simone. It's a break from nearly 66 years of being written for the most part by men. '[Her work as a blogger] led to a writing job for the all-female comic 'Birds of Prey' for DC--which became a short-lived, live-action TV series--and in turn won her the "Wonder Woman" job. Simone says she sees a change since she wrote her refrigerator rant 10 years ago. 'At that time, the trend was towards grim stories where female characters were killed,' she says. 'We only had a handful of female characters to look up to. Today we're not seeing those stories so much.'"

30 of 210 comments (clear)

  1. What about the woman last year? by JustJon · · Score: 5, Informative

    Is this really such a big break when novelist Jodi Picoult wrote Wonder Woman last year, and is a woman herself?

  2. What about Marsden's Bondage Themes? by Bonker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    William Marsden created Wonder Woman as a role model of what he considered feminine strengths. These are very much the traditional 'yin' feminine values and focused less on female empowerment and much more on beauty, demure behavior, and obedience. Women can be strong, Marsden reasoned, by focusing on their womanhood and need not waste time trying to fit into male roles.

    Marsden was also a bit of a pervert. His wife and their live-in slave... er... maid, lived in more-or-less open polygamy. They were his bondage slaves, and were apparently quite happy to be so. This theme, of feminine happiness through obedience and subservience, is repeated frequently through Wonder Woman. Not only did Wonder Woman frequently get tied up with her own magic lasso, but pretty much all the Amazon girls loved being bound, spanked, or otherwise disciplined by their superiors.

    While you may disagree with Marsden's symbolism, any retelling of Wonder Woman that leaves out the bondage isn't really doing the subject very much justice. Wonderwoman need not end up stuffed in a refrigerator, but she does need to be frequently paddled to keep the story moving.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:What about Marsden's Bondage Themes? by Shipwack · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You have it backwards... Marston believed in female -superiority-, not submission. If anyone was the slave in their poly household it was him. A quote from him form the Wikipedia article:

      "Give them an alluring woman stronger than themselves to submit to, and they'll be proud to become her willing slaves!"
      From Nick Gillepsie's article about him in Reason magazinehttp://www.reason.com/news/show/28014.html/:

      For Marston, the most "constructive" comics were those that laid the groundwork for what he insisted was the coming age of "American matriarchy" in which "women would take over the rule of the country, politically and economically."
      I doubt very much the two woman he lived with were his "bondage slaves".
  3. Work as a blogger? by Telvin_3d · · Score: 5, Informative

    Her work as a blogger? Simone has been working in the comics industry for almost a decade now and got the job of writing Wonder Woman due to a solid history of writing well crafted, memorable, stories. She has worked for both the major comic companies and a few of the minor ones writing everything from established superhero books to quirky creator-owned stuff. To suggest that she got a high profile job because of her BLOG is kind of insulting to the hard work she has put in over the years.

    1. Re:Work as a blogger? by \\ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Her blog got her noticed at CBR, which got her noticed by Bongo, which eventually got her noticed by Marvel & DC, which eventually got her a Wonder Woman job. It took close to ten years, but that was the progression. Yes, she's talented, and her humble beginnings in the comic book industry begain with a blog.

      Gail Simone didn't "get" anything because of her blog, she earned her way as a good writer that got noticed and continues to do so. The path she took just happened to start with a blog. What are you so defensive about?

  4. Excuse me? by Frisbee_Chick · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Um...yeah...but no

    Read the rant. Completely disagree. FYI I don't have hairy pits or legs.

    Doesn't every character/hero of consequence go through some life-defining moment. She writes as is every female goes off to a grimson end or a tragic moment but uh hello...there's life....there's character building...there's a good friggin story.

    Look at the list and it blatantly leaves out key figures in the comic universes. Examples:

    Superman died

    Batman was paralyzed only to come back and take out the sorry sack of shit who replaced him

    Robin died

    Spawn was a crusader who was reborn in hell...how more tragic is fighting for what you believe to be a noble cause and hello you go straight to hell

    Wolverine was used, abused, lost his memory and then ended up working for the X-men

    Sorry...but a personal pet peeve is a feminist fight without a true argument. Sorry to say but women were allowed the same fates as men. I personally love when the woman is a villain. At least we're acknowledged as a threat. A good story always involves a sad or grimsom moment for the lead character. Thankfully women have been subjected to same fates of men in the comic world.

    1. Re:Excuse me? by Kierthos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Okay, how about Kyle Rayner's (the Green Lantern replacement after Hal Jordan was possessed by the Parallax entity) girlfriend, killed by Major Force and stuffed in a fridge? Or Kyle's mom, killed by one of the Sinestro Corps?

      How about the incidents which started the Identity Crisis in DC? Those would be the (revealed as a past event) rape of the Elongated Man's wife, Sue Dibny, and then later her murder? Oh, and the ultimate culprit of it was Jean Loring, the ex-wife of the Atom.

      Superman dies during the attack by Doomsday, but he ends up coming back. Hippolyta (Wonder Woman's mother) dies during the fight with Imperiex and stays dead. Batman gets his back broken by Bane in the Knightfall arc but ends up getting better. Barbara Gordon is partially paralyzed by the Joker in Batman: The Killing Joke and never regains the use of her legs (well, okay, for like two issues in Birds of Prey she does).

      Do you need more examples?

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    2. Re:Excuse me? by Greg_D · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Two words for you: Jason Todd.

      You can say whatever you want about the TINY, TINY percentage of females in comics who have died over the years, but Jason Todd was VOTED TO DIE BY THE FANS, and nobody gave it a thought, because men are supposed to die.

      The percentage of men in comics who are killed, maimed, depowered, and disfigured DWARFS the female characters both in percentage and number.

      Hell, the ORIGINAL Superman was beaten to death. His wife just passed away naturally. Chalk up old Lois to the list, I guess. And it isn't important the way that Kara Zor-El died, only that she did. Who gives a shit about heroism when you can have kvetching instead?

      Batman and Superman couldn't BE Batman and Superman without being alive or being able to walk. It's kind of a prerequesite to the job, and they obviously aren't going to have anything major happen to them since they support so many books. Hyppolyta didn't stay dead. And Barbara Gordon is a more important character now as Oracle than she ever was as Batgirl... and the reason she isn't walking right now is because she CHOSE not to, in a story that Gail wrote.

      The entire line of thinking is fucking stupid. Most of the main characters in comics are men, because men are the people who buy the majority of comics. If you want to build up conflict, you can do it a number of ways, but when you want to build up a tragedy for a character, it's going to come in the form of hurt to someone that character cares about, and MOST of them are heterosexual men, therefore most of their love interests are going to be women.

      Did it have to be Sue Dibny in Identity Crisis? Yeah, it pretty much did. Sue and Ralph have been around in comics for years, but aren't really important characters. Sue in particular had a reputation for being sweet and fun, so it made sense for her to be the target if you're going to have to kill off a non-hero character important enough to the other characters for them to all panic without directly impacting any of the other books. Likewise, Jean Loring wasn't an important character, UNTIL she killed Sue. Now, she's one of the most important characters in the DC comics universe.

      But you know what? If it had been a guy killing another guy the exact same way, you wouldn't have given it a second thought. Because men are supposed to be violent and kill other men, but women are supposed to be precious. What utter bullshit.

    3. Re:Excuse me? by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Plus, the point trying to be made here is that there is a lot of history towards "unpopular male character retires or dies only to return for a later comic as needed" as well as "unpopular female character dies or get crippled or tortured only to never return".

      1. She didn't make that point. All she gave was a list of female characters to whom bad things happen--we have no idea of their relative popularity, nor whether or not they were ever conveniently temporarily revived. We don't even have a similar list of dead and mangled male characters to compare it to. Considering how large the comics industry is, and for how many decades it's been popular, I don't think her list is a very big at all.

      2. I didn't even realize it at first, but a lot of them apparently aren't even superheroes. OF COURSE bad shit happens to the superhero's (or supervillian's) girlfriend--bad things happening to innocent bystanders is a primary motivation for good *and* bad guys everywhere. That most superheroes (and supervillians) are male is a given--therefore, it shouldn't be surprising if most innocent-bystanders-just-waiting-to-be-killed-or-maimed-for-plot-advancement are female.

      3. A lot of the non-fatal stuff she mentions (and less than half of the characters mentioned actually die) appears to be completely temporary in nature, like person X losing her powers (when I know for a fact that they regain them later on.) This is... simply absurd. I'm only a VERY casual comic fan, but I've read entire-series summaries and they typically go like this: Superman fights XYZ, loses his powers, gains powers again, gets turned into a weird green blob, gets turns back again, gets his ass kicked, makes a comeback and kicks his own ass, etc.

      In short, temporary negative shit happens to every single superhero ever conceived... period. If Batman wasn't humiliated and brutalized from time to time, he wouldn't be Batman. If Superman didn't lose his powers occasionally, he'd grow tiresome (weeeeeell, he's tiresome anyway, but that's beside the point.) Shit happens, superheroes deal with it, THAT'S THE FUCKING POINT. I mean look at this crap:

      * Scarlet Witch (children 'die'/vanish/are lost because they are figments of her imagination)

      I know very very very little about the Scarlet Witch. As I recall, she's from the X-Men universe and she has the power to alter reality at will. I don't even know if she's a good guy or bad guy or switch hitter, but anyway--what's described there sounds like a very powerful bit of character development. Villian or hero, that sounds interesting... but according to the writer, it's just another way to degrade women. She even put "figments of her imagination" in italics, for emphasis, as if it was almost too horrible to be believed.

      * Wolfsbane (locked in werewolf form for awhile, needs major therapy)

      I know nothing of the character. Sounds like it's the typical "couldn't control own powers" plot line that pretty much every single goddamned superhero has had to deal with.

      * Diamond Lil (kidnapped, experimented on by own government, developed benign breast tumor)

      ...a benign tumor. BENIGN. OMG, and Superman had a hangnail in #9375. Re: government experimentation, this is an EXTREMELY common theme with any hero who possesses superpowers (Wolverine leaps to mind.)

      In short, this looks like a very lame, cherry-picked list without any male list to compare it to.

      OMG, Bruce Wayne had to watch his parents die WHEN HE WAS A KID! And he acted kinda crazy and macho in the Dark Knight Returns! And Superman has turned evil and lost his powers and died and god knows what else. And all kinds of bad crap happens to Spiderman! Right there, those are the top 3 superheroes in the world... so that's proof that the comics industry HATES men!!!!

      Idiot.

    4. Re:Excuse me? by dirk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the main point isn't that something bad happened to these character (whether permanent or temporary) but why it happened. These things happened generally to further define/motivate a male character. The majority of time, these women were used as designated victim to motivate a male character. The things that happened didn't help define these women as characters, they helped to show why the man was upset and wanting revenge.

      When Batman's back was broken, it lead to him coming back stronger and help define his character more. When Black Canary was beaten to a pulp in the Longbow Hunters, it lead not to her coming back even stronger and helping to further define her character, but to Green Arrow coming in and killing the perpetrators, thus showing more about his character. If Black Canary had come back from the beating like Batman did, we wouldn't be talking about it. But instead of using it to further her character, it happened to further the male character.

      When writers never (or extremely rarely) take a male friend and kill them to anger the male character. They always use a female as the designated victim. The injury to the women are used not to push forward their own story, they are used solely to enhance the males in the story and give them a reason to do something.

      --

      "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
    5. Re:Excuse me? by hkmarks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's right. Someone called that "dead men defrosting" (as opposed to "women in refrigerators").

      Men get to go back to their former status quo after getting screwed. Women generally don't. WiR specifically refers to women getting screwed over or killed to advance NOT their own development, but instead the development of a male character to whom they are attached. If a male character (such as Wolverine) gets screwed, it's usually to advance his own character, not someone else's.

      It's not a hard and fast rule, of course, but a general observation. There are plenty of counterpoints -- it's not like the boys don't get killed. The key thing is that it's hard for women to enjoy comics when the female characters are getting raped and murdered. It's just not fun to read about.

      http://www.unheardtaunts.com/wir/

  5. Re:uh oh by rednip · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you'd turn away from your thrice daily dose of 'liberal outrage', and crawl out of your parent's basement, you'd realize that the 'Nazi Socialist PC ball buster' only really exists in the minds of men who are insecure about their own masculinity. Others who continue propagate such trash, do so as they believe that some reward could be gained (ratings, votes, book sales, and other forms of income in particular).

    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
  6. Re:What about MARSTON's Bondage Themes? by Bonker · · Score: 2, Informative
    Hmmph. I spelled his name wrong. It's Marston and not Marsden. I should be bound and flogged by nubile Amazon warrior maidens.

    Not even girls want to be girls so long as our feminine archetype lacks force, strength, and power. Not wanting to be girls, they don't want to be tender, submissive, peace-loving as good women are. Women's strong qualities have become despised because of their weakness. The obvious remedy is to create a feminine character with all the strength of Superman plus all the allure of a good and beautiful woman.


    Interestingly, Marston is also frequently credited as the inventor of the Polygraph. He discouraged its use as a law enforcement device.
    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  7. Re:uh oh by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh, I guarantee that women like that exist. There is simply too much diversity in the world for them not to. It's the principle of "If you can think of something, it already exists on the Internet, and there's probably already fetish porn about it."

    But while I wouldn't call you a "Nazi Socialist PC ball buster", look what you did here: "men who are insecure about their own masculinity."

    I don't disagree that it's possible to be feminist without being a feminazi, and you may even be right that the feminazi is a myth. But I've seen women propagate and participate in that myth.

    When attacking others for their intolerance or prejudice, it helps to not be showing your own prejudice in the same breath. (Not even going to start with the "crawl out of your parent's basement" comment.)

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  8. No, they do exist. by rjh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In 1993 I was a freshman at a large university. I saw a fellow student staggering under a double armload of textbooks, and I did precisely what I would do for any student in a fellow situation: I opened the door. The fact this student was female had no bearing on my decision. In return for this, I got a glare and then a shouted "You know, it's because of domineering, overbearing males like you that one in four college women is raped!" Then she stormed off and found another entrance to the building, just so she could avoid the door I opened for her.

    But wait, she's not the caricature the far-right draws of the militant feminist. She was just a jerk. Women can be jerks as easily as men.

    A few years ago I was talking to a Women's Studies professor at Florida State and I related this story. I also mentioned how angry I had been at the time, still was, to be lumped in with rapists just because I opened a door for someone who had a double armload of books. This professor listened, considered her words very carefully, and then said clearly I needed to take her introductory Women's Studies course so that I could understand the jerk's "context". I said I didn't really care about her context, it was a stupid comparison to make, and the hate directed at me was entirely undeserved and uncivilized. "Yes, but that's the point, you see," she explained to me patiently. "You've never opened your eyes and thought about what sort of life experiences could make her react in such a way, or the actions you did which provoked this response. You only care about your own male-oriented view and undercutting the validity of her life experience." (I am not quoting her exactly, but I am quoting her pretty darn close. It's been a few years, but the outrageousness of the dialog has made it stick in my memory very clearly.)

    She went on for about another ten minutes before I had enough and stormed away.

    The woman in 1993 was just a jerk. The Florida State Women's Studies prof who defended her and not once expressed a sentiment of "yes, she was a jerk"? She was the right-wing caricature of a feminazi.

    Fortunately, people like her seem to be rare. At least, I've never found one outside of a Women's Studies department. (And I've met one Women's Studies prof since then who characterized the Florida State prof as "what a bitch!", which did my heart no end of good.)

    1. Re:No, they do exist. by bombshelter13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point is that if the girl carrying the books would have reacted any differently to a female who'd attempted to help her with the door*, then her reaction was inappropriate. Regardless of any life experiences she may have had, her reaction was sexist and uncalled for. No possible (or impossible but theoretically describable) life experience could make this action non-sexist. This is not to say that her life experiences do not have value, it is to say that the value of her life experience (whatever that may be) and the appropriateness (is that a word) of her choice of reaction are in no way connected. * Before anyone jumps on my saying 'how do you know she wouldn't have said the same thing to a female who'd helped her, well, the rather gender specific nature of the words in her reaction leaves me to believe she would have taken a third option. If you honestly, seriously, believe she would have reacted identically, keeping in mind that reacting identically requires her refer to the female assisting her as an 'overbearing man', then I cannot argue with you.

    2. Re:No, they do exist. by toiletsalmon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "So a 5 second reaction from a girl who might have emotional problems proves that these women exist. Well, ok then."

      Yes, I believe it does prove that she was a "Feminist Ball Buster". She was hostile and showed aggression towards a man for no real reason so to speak, and then insulted him BECAUSE he was a man. That seems rather feminist to me, and I think it was pretty obvious that she was, indeed "busting his balls". I'm glad we agree on that :)

      "Furthermore, a conversation where you presented yourself as a victim, didn't go over so well:"

      Same thing here. She was taking a "feminist" position here. Maybe she wasn't "busting his balls" per se, but that was feminist jibba-jabba if I've ever heard it.

      The problem with many (not all, many) feminists is that they really don't give a damn about empowering women (which I'm all for BTW). They've got their own agenda that has to do with taking power away from the "rich white man" and then using it to "get even" with him for all the bad things that he's done. On the one hand, that might not be such a bad idea, but on the other hand swapping one abusive "master" for an abusive "mastress" isn't really what I'd call progress, and it certainly isn't in the spirit of equality. At least what I would call equality.

      Granted, the aforementioned professor wasn't THAT extreme in her beliefs, but she was on the other side of the same page because what she was basically saying is that the "book girl" deserved some special type of consideration because her genitals are on the inside. Special treatment and equality are usually mutually exclusive.

      If any man said that men should bet treated differently just because his genitals are on the outside of his body, most people would say that he was a chauvinistic jerk. Why should it be any different for women?

    3. Re:No, they do exist. by rpillala · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think context is the perfect explanation for both of these people. Women do live in a different larger context than men, and aren't as free to have the context redefined from moment to moment. I guess that's the line of thinking anyway. Your friend from 1993 should have reacted to the context of "it would have been difficult to get through this door with a double armload of books," but instead reacted to "men treat women like they're helpless." Domineering though? I'm gonna go with no. Like with most jerk behavior, it comes from insecurity. The women's studies professor has spent too much time in her head meditating on this to realize that it's not a valid way to assign blame. You personally aren't responsible for any of the way 1993 was treated in her past. She had no call to treat you that way, but women in the abstract do have some claims against men in the abstract. The freedom from a larger context in which people make assumptions about you is surely a characteristic of a (social) majority. I can relate to this because may parents are from India and I'm nonwhite. It used to be that in every group of people I was the standin for all Indians. Meaning when I met someone new they asked me if I knew their doctor or if I worshipped a cow. They weren't talking to me, they were talking to the generic case of "Indian person." Being forced to always be the ambassador from India and explain Hinduism and caste gets old very fast. It still happens now, and with people I've known for years. They see me and immediately start talking about their new Indian neighbor or colleague or brother-in-law. Or they hear that I'm vegetarian and start talking at length about their favorite meat foods from India. Whoops I'm venting sorry. I don't go off on these people but I sure feel like it sometimes, as you can see. Does that make me a jerk? I don't know.

      Once when I was in high school I was working at a mall store and someone came in and angrily demanded to know whether I spoke English. I had read about discrimination before but never had it applied directly to my face. Until then I had never thought about it happening to me. Since then it's been very hard for me not to consider whether I'm being treated differently because of race. For white people I'm sure this almost never enters their thinking because by and large there are no assumptions about behaviors and competencies (and deficiencies more to the point) based on whiteness. I couldn't say for sure since I've never been white. For white people I think it most often comes from having an ethnic name, but really I don't know.

      So I think that's what women's studies professor 1 meant by context, but she should have known that you can't dismiss people's experiences when trying to make them see other people's experiences. College professors aren't always teachers inside.

      Maybe next time check and see what the books are first :)

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
    4. Re:No, they do exist. by rjh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would suggest reading Christina Hoff Summers' Who Stole Feminism? sometime. It's a well-written book authored by a women's studies professor who takes to task some of the extreme elements of the field. If you can find it, it's plenty worth reading, and might bring you some more hope.

      I will sit down and listen to an old-school equity feminist like Summers any time. I have no patience for the new school of gender feminism.

  9. Re:Fine by me... by ILuvRamen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    funny you should mention this. I saw something on the history channel about Wonder Woman and way back in the day when it first came out, even the author admits it was practically kinky porn with clothes on. It was like some pervy bondage comic. They showed shots of some pages and I was like WHOA seriously wtf.

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  10. Re:There's a reason for it. by uxbn_kuribo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Soap Opera stories + violence = comic books. And pro wrestling.

    --
    No portion of this post may be rebroadcast without the express, written consent of Major League Baseball.
  11. Simone on Wonder Woman? News from April, 2007. by JoshDM · · Score: 2, Informative

    Slow News Day at Slashdot if you're covering something that was announced almost a year ago.

  12. where's the tenderness? by rednip · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Still, no compassion for this girl you scared, and it's fairly clear that you scared her. Yes, it's likely she might have acted different if some girl ran up. However, just imagine a shy girl, first semester (maybe) in a large University , away from home, maybe just out of the 'date rape discussion' they force on every freshmen, walking back to her dorm, minding her own business. Random guy comes up and without any introduction get into her personal space. Then she gives a quick not even half though explanation, about why she got jumpy, but that proves she is a militant feminist.

    What you should have done was announce yourself, saying perhaps 'let me get that for you'. I do it all the time, and a couple of times I've had them size me up for a second, in particular when I've blindsided them. I sincerely hope that someone doesn't judge you as harshly. Dude, you really need to take a fresh look at both of those conversations, I'll be that you see them differently, if you step back from yourself.

    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
  13. P.O.V. by themadplasterer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wonder Woman in a P.O.V.? That's hawt!

  14. this makes as much sense by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    as a romance novel written from the point of view of the ridiculously sensitive male leads in the story:

    "your tits are huge, let's shag"

    yeah, that's going to sell romance novels

    impossible proportioned female superheroes exist to satisfy the id of prepubescent boys. there is no female pov to these characters that has any meaning. they are stereotypical characters meant to satisfy male views about solving problems by fighting. women have their own fantasy fiction with impossible male characters meant to satisfy female views about the glory of courtship with a great guy

    why mess with these shallow fantasies? nothing is improved, the value of the characters are just negated for their intended audiences

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  15. Re:Astounding ! by It'sYerMam · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What if I told you that there is a 25% chance of getting pounded (unwilling) in the ass? I'll bet dollars to a dough nut that you'll think 'don't ass fuck me', and maybe even say it when presented unexpectedly with an event associated with it.

    If you associate opening a door with being raped then that's not the fault of the door-opener. The wallet example is a good one. If you pick up someone's wallet (or other important/valuable item) and hand it to them, you would surely be justifiably offended if they yelled 'Thief!' snatched it from your hands and ran away. You would be even more offended if they incorporated some prejudiced slur into their justification for calling you a thief - be it a reference to your gender, race or something else. Whatever experiences that person has had, they are still a jerk, or at least perhaps paranoid to the point of illness, if they associate a helpful action with malicious intent.

    --
    im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
  16. Re:There's a reason for it. by boyko.at.netqos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Comics are boys club because boys don't want to read soap opera emo trash."

    *cough* Sandman *cough*

    Right, but "boys" aren't reading the comics. When was the last time you saw a comics shop with kids in it outnumbering the adults?

    No, I think you're onto the right thing for the wrong reason. Comics lend themselves well to short, action stories and simple parables because of the nature of the medium. 22 short pages. Very little text. Lots of artwork. And a history of only being able to tell the most bland of stories due to the legacy of the Comics Code.

    I do, in fact, see women reading comics - but those comics are manga stories which are usually published in large compilations that can go on for thousands of pages. In the "manga style", you can tell a long story with subtlety, spend pages exploring a single emotion or moment. But guess what, guys read it too.

    There are traditional, non-manga comics which can look at these themes, and I'll pass up "Superman" every time to get to them. But those are rare and hard to pick out amongst the TONS of comic book titles.

    I mean, if I'm looking for a long, epic story exploring complex themes, I'll rent a 3 hour movie. Or get a TV series on DVD.

    --
    I used to work for NetQoS. I no longer do, but want to keep the excellent karma attached to this account.
  17. Re:typical by Headw1nd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What orginal poster/troll? You replied to a guy talking about Wonder Woman in a pantsuit with a rant about militant feminists. Did you mean to reply to some other post?

  18. Re:Fine by me... by hkmarks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Gail Simone is a fantastic writer and a personal hero of mine.

    I'm counting on two things in her Wonder Woman run... which actually started a couple of months ago, so this story is kind of late, but anyway...

    The same standard of quality storytelling and hilarity she's shown on her previous books, such as Birds of Prey (about ex-Batgirl Barbara Gordon, now super-hacker Oracle, and her various superheroine operatives). So far, we have evil Amazons and talking gorillas, so all is well.

    And, as in her previous books, plenty of equal opportunity nudity.

  19. Re:Fine by you... by FauxReal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The truth is, to an extent that's how some things tend to be in comics. An interesting article on the phenomena is discussed using the character Power Girl.

    http://daveslongbox.blogspot.com/2005/09/boob-war-climax-everybody-loves-power.html

    Ever notice how every strong female on Heroes is either killed off, raped or suffers an attempted sexual assault? Except the motor mimic girl, but the show went on hiatus mid beatdown.