Slashdot Mirror


Hand-Made Vacuum Tubes

djmoore writes "Over at Make Magazine, watch this video of a French amateur radio operator making and testing his own vacuum tubes. It looks like he built much of his own equipment as well. The Make poster notes: 'I love the ease with which he performs these rather high-end skills (like glass forming), the gestural flourishes (like it's hand magic), and the Zelig-esque soundtrack.'"

227 comments

  1. reason by User+956 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Over at Make Magazine, watch this video of a French amateur radio operator making and testing his own vacuum tubes.

    This was covered in Make Magazine, primarily because Nature abhors a vacuum.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:reason by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      I stopped getting Make when they had the piece about the PID controller for your espresso machine, the author basically wrote "I don't know how it works, but it works, so lets just use it." Make degenerated into Popular Science magazine.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    2. Re:reason by ptorrone · · Score: 4, Informative

      the article is over 5+ pages with a lot of details on making something (http://www.make-digital.com/make/vol04/?pg=124&pm=2&u1=friend) - while the author didn't post the data sheets he used an analogy and explained it to do the project, that's what most folks want, at least for this type of article - for more details we usually the companion pages on MAKE, the forums and additional articles we refer to. part of a project like this is a little reverse engineering from an amateur who is ok with exploring things too - regardless, sorry we didn't live up to your expectations.

    3. Re:reason by eclectro · · Score: 2, Funny

      Quite honestly, this guy has nothing on me. I'm building a space shuttle out of disposable razors!

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    4. Re:reason by Sanat · · Score: 4, Funny

      I do hope that your trip is not dicey.

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
    5. Re:reason by chaney · · Score: 0

      I hate to be "that guy", but I watched this video on hackaday.com when it was posted... yesterday. Thanks for not citing your sources /. =]

    6. Re:reason by iocat · · Score: 1
      The current issue is Ok, but MAKE really almost lost me with the Bike issue... oh look, a bunch of hippies made less functional, but larger, bicycles. How arty. How... boring. I'm sure there's some better magazine to feature burning man people in (although, maybe not).

      I guess I'm less interested in the art elements, and more interested in the nerd elements. The maker section up front is now basically all artist and really dull and stupid.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    7. Re:reason by jeffshoaf · · Score: 0

      Quite honestly, this guy has nothing on me. I'm building a space shuttle out of disposable razors! I'll bet it's cutting-edge...
      --
      Putting the "anal" back into "analyst"...
    8. Re:reason by eclectro · · Score: 1

      Yeah, when I launch it there won't be a dull moment...

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  2. are you saying by Bananatree3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Make Magazine sucks? How dare you!

    1. Re:are you saying by EveLibertine · · Score: 1

      Wow, modded as flamebait. That joke flew right over someone's head.

    2. Re:are you saying by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      I guess all the suction must have generated enough lift on the joke to get it right over the mods' heads.

  3. Yeah, well by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Funny
    Make will rectify that!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Yeah, well by pilsner.urquell · · Score: 1

      Do you think Make has the control?

    2. Re:Yeah, well by somersault · · Score: 1

      At first it may seem like that, but ultimately the makefile is master here.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:Yeah, well by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      Please - enough of this rancor! I'm positive that we can run all these negative comments to ground!

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
  4. The art of electronics by Bananatree3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This guy isn't just a tinkerer, but an artist as well. This kind of thing is an art as much as it is a science.

    1. Re:The art of electronics by User+956 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, like Pierre Scerri, who spent 15 years making a scale model of a Ferrari 312. Not only did he make the body, he learned to make glass in order to create the headlights, and learned to make rubber to make his own tires. It's almost unbelievable.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    2. Re:The art of electronics by callmetheraven · · Score: 1

      The man is an artiste, a craftsman, of great skill. I am most impressed by "les fingernails francaises."

      --
      You can have my SIG when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
    3. Re:The art of electronics by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can respect having an obsessive hobby. Especially when it produces such spectacular results.

      However, if you're going to spend that much time, why not build a full size vehicle so you can actually drive it?

    4. Re:The art of electronics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As are all the poor schlubs who still turn out gazillions of vacuum tubes in China and Russia.

    5. Re:The art of electronics by RDW · · Score: 4, Interesting

      'I can respect having an obsessive hobby. Especially when it produces such spectacular results.'

      Though with some people, this sort of thing can get just a bit _too_ obsessive:

      http://www.sandia.gov/LabNews/LN02-13-98/cherry_story.html

      'The switch mechanisms Kaczynski used were hand-made switches that he would spend weeks building...He machined his own screws.'

    6. Re:The art of electronics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can respect having an obsessive hobby.

      Apparently, you've never had tendinitis of the wrist.

    7. Re:The art of electronics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He machined his own screws.

      Machining screws isn't so bad, but if the some guy starts hand filing and grinding his own screws to a perfect mirror polish, watch out...

    8. Re:The art of electronics by Juliemac · · Score: 1

      As a teenager I learned basic electronics from my 8x yo neighbour. It was fascinating watching him build the grids, add the getter, then seal the tube. Soon it would be glowing in the reciever pulling in the LF signals. Truely a lost art, I wish I could have learned more from him.

    9. Re:The art of electronics by Frogbert · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's all well and good but after 15 years and your done wouldn't you think to yourself... Damn I should have made a full scale replica.

    10. Re:The art of electronics by plover · · Score: 4, Funny

      He machined his own screws.
      Machining screws isn't so bad, but if the some guy starts hand filing and grinding his own screws to a perfect mirror polish, watch out...

      Many moons ago I was the "gofer" for our school's one act play. The lead character was going to use a prop broom as a crutch, so the teacher in charge told me to shorten the wooden screw-in handle of the broom. I cut the stick down, and spent the afternoon hand-carving a new screw thread into the bare wood that fit perfectly in the broom head. I was really proud of that carving. But the handle was still a few inches too tall, so the teacher told me to cut it shorter. And this time, he told me to just cut off the plain end. D'oh!

      --
      John
    11. Re:The art of electronics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't Ted "Unabomber" Kaczynski do something like that?

      What one REALLY need to fear is someone who can hand grind beryllium, tungsten, and Oralloy shells with the finish of polished lenses.

    12. Re:The art of electronics by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      As a teenager I learned basic electronics from my 8x yo neighbour. It was fascinating watching him build the grids, add the getter, then seal the tube. Soon it would be glowing in the receiver pulling in the LF signals.

      Truly a lost art, I wish I could have learned more from him. If I'd learned that kind of thing as a kid I think there's a chance ham radio could have kept my attention. But just buying a rig and talking to people... boooring..
      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    13. Re:The art of electronics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, if you're going to spend that much time, why not build a full size vehicle so you can actually drive it? Because that is copyright infringement.
    14. Re:The art of electronics by Juliemac · · Score: 1

      I went from Radio to the "new" microprocessor called the 8008. I have been hooked on micros and controllers since. Hams have done most of the development in radio, not big corps. They have the passion and love for reaching farther then "stock"

    15. Re:The art of electronics by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      I went from Radio to the "new" microprocessor called the 8008. I have been hooked on micros and controllers since.
      Hams have done most of the development in radio, not big corps. They have the passion and love for reaching farther then "stock" That may be - but unfortunately it's not a side of the hobby I was ever introduced to...
      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  5. We need this type of thing done in the classrooms by Jailbrekr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While vacumn tubes are strictly in the realm of hobbyists and zealous audiophiles, nevertheless it is important for teens and young adults to understand where the electronics industry started from. They're already made to study what can argueably be considered useless information, so why not study something that is cool and informative as well? Think of it as shop class for nerds.

    --
    Feed the need: Digitaladdiction.net
  6. what type? by Weh · · Score: 0

    Wonder what type (or equivalent) they are. In any case, wondering if he does "guitar amp tubes" like 12ax7, el34/84 and 6L6.

    1. Re:what type? by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Those are all pentodes which are more complicated internally.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  7. The next logical step... by bubbl07 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps we can use these hand-made tubes to make a new hand-made internets! Think of the possibilities!

    1. Re:The next logical step... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Actually, an all-mechanical Internet would be more interesting.

      Kind of like the old Telegraph system, but with newer gear.

      There have in the past been many installations, probably even a significant number of Arpanet 'sites' that consisted of an electromechanical Teletype machine.

    2. Re:The next logical step... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      hand made punch cards?

      He demonstrated a Morse code station.

    3. Re:The next logical step... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      It would take forever to make them. You'd need like a dump truck full of tubes, which goes against the point.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  8. Re:"French amateur radio operator" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Neither Make nor Slashdot have the basic decency to name the man: Claude Paillard.

    What is it with acting like foreign nationals are some sort of trained monkey? C'mon folks.

    Anyway, here's a direct link to his site so you can skip the non-article at Make. Site includes much information (use the fish as needed), the streaming dailymotion vid, and a download link for those who can't see streams. Enjoy.
    http://paillard.claude.free.fr/

    Thanks Claude! That rocks.

  9. thank you by Bananatree3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    for pointing out the man's website and giving him direct credit. Its sad to see something placed without naming the inventor.

    1. Re:thank you by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Its sad to see something placed without naming the inventor.

      Actually, the guy didn't invent them, you know, as long as we're nitpicking :)

      Still, i'm floored. Great video.

  10. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of us use tube-based lab gear. And I believe the LCD you're using uses tubes for backlighting, unless you're on a CR tube?

  11. First Thought... MEVs by davidsyes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not Million Electron Volts, but

    "Male Enhancer Volume System Product"

    How much juice/oomph can YOUR tubes deliver?

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    1. Re:First Thought... MEVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a spam filter d00d. And go read a physics book!

    2. Re:First Thought... MEVs by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      I will read a physiques ... umm physics book while testing out my vacuum and vacuum-filling tubes...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  12. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by kidsizedcoffin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For better or not, you don't need to be a zealous audiophile to appreciate the sound of a tube guitar amp.

  13. Re:"French amateur radio operator" by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Oh, I think the answer is quite clear what happened here.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  14. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by crosson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do you have to see everything through the category useful/useless? Is it so hard for you to imagine that one day, let's say in the next 1000's of years, we will need a guy who can make vacuum tubes? It's never good for any technologies to be lost, even if they seem too old to be useful now.

  15. Re:"French amateur radio operator" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    What is it with acting like foreign nationals are some sort of trained monkey? C'mon folks.

    Wow, like I didn't realize people in other countries had personal names :o

  16. 14.524MHz? by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    did i see him transmitting CW on 14.524? in the USA i know the top limit on the 20 meter band is 14.350, not sure about France, someone with that much talent and skills can do whatver the they want (Kudos!) that is some remarkable craftsmanship...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:14.524MHz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you assume that he was transmitting? The chances are that he was just receiving..

    2. Re:14.524MHz? by jiriw · · Score: 1

      As far as I know 14,524 MHz indeed is not a legal frequency. But it might be he's transmitting on 2 Meter and there is a 10* switch somewhere or the last digit simply isn't shown on the frequency generator (if it's indeed that)? 145,240 MHz is smack in the middle of the 2 meter amateur band.

      However ... *gasp* that IS some skill!

    3. Re:14.524MHz? by FudRucker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ah ha! you are so right!, i have my nose in the HF too much, i mostly ignore VHF/UHF except when programming a police scanner...

      i have a nice R.L. Drake shortwave receiver and love to listen to HF a lot, so when ham radio is the topic the HF bands are what i automatically think of...

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  17. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 0, Troll

    yes, tubes might make a slight improvement to the sound comming out of your guitar amp, but if you want your equiptment to really sing, you absolutly must go with a $500 wooden volume knob.

    --
    -I only code in BASIC.-
  18. Upping the coolness factor by autophile · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The only thing that would make this cooler is if he made his own Nixie tubes!

    I thought there were issues not addressed clearly in the video. First, I thought I learned in college chemistry (now rummaging in decades-old longterm storage media) that one of the big problems was getting a good seal of glass around metal, which wasn't solved until they put together the right glass with the right metal.

    Also, aren't the electrodes in a vacuum tube coated with something to prevent early breakdown? And isn't there some chemical you have to put inside the tube to absorb the gas given off when electrons smash into the electrodes? So while this is incredibly neat-looking, I don't think the tubes would last very long...

    --Rob

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
    1. Re:Upping the coolness factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Also, aren't the electrodes in a vacuum tube coated with something to prevent early breakdown? And isn't there some chemical you have to put inside the tube to absorb the gas given off when electrons smash into the electrodes? So while this is incredibly neat-looking, I don't think the tubes would last very long...

      Did you even watch the hole video?! Or did you just assume because he was French that he was incompetent?!

    2. Re:Upping the coolness factor by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      he does seem to dip the electrode assembly in several pots after manufacture. I can't read what it says on the pots though as it's in french.

      As for right metal/right glass I presume that is just a matter of buying the right materials.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re:Upping the coolness factor by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      So while this is incredibly neat-looking, I don't think the tubes would last very long... What makes you think that those issues haven't been dealt with? Just because you couldn't tell how they were dealt with from the video?
    4. Re:Upping the coolness factor by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      I haven't done much reading, writing, or speaking in French for about 13 years, but I can pick out a couple. To the far left in front is apparently acetone. The last one on the right in front is either "acide chloridrique" or "acide chlorhydrique", which would be either chloric acid or hydrochloric acid.

      The one labeled "eau ..." is water of some sort ("eau" being "water"), but I'm having trouble picking out just what sort. The label wraps around and looks like the adjective starts with "denin", but maybe it's "demin". I can't think of anything nor find anything that starts with "denin". Perhaps it actually starts "demin" and is "eau déminéralisée", or demineralized water. That makes sense.

      Other types of water, for the curious... Permuted water is "eau permutée". Distilled waster is "eau distilleée". The first instinct as an English-speaking American with limited French would be to say "eau dénaturée" for denatured water, and Babelfish thinks that's right, too. Deionized water would be "eau désionisée". So I'm pretty much out of ideas for types of water to translate. :-)

      BTW, the section title "C'est l'heure de bain" means "It's time for a bath" or "It's bath time". (More directly, "It's the hour of the bath", but that of course sounds really awkward.)

    5. Re:Upping the coolness factor by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Someone on the Neonixie-L mailing list has done just that.

  19. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by hedley · · Score: 1

    No end of projects if you want to go old school. If you get your glass blowing down, you can make a mercury arc rectifier! Its all good right up until the part about the 2kg of mercury needed to "make it happen". Also, the voltages and currents tend to be a bit high. Great to look at! Just don't breath the vapour that leeches out.

  20. Rectifyer Vacuum Tubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The person who modded you offtopic doesn't know that Vacuum Tubes are used as RECTIFIERS.

  21. In Soviet Russia by infonography · · Score: 1

    Well just to start it as a joke, but it was for a while post-Soviet Union was the only place to get new made Vacuum tubes. Thats for the Tube Stereo buffs out there.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  22. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

    While vacumn tubes are strictly in the realm of hobbyists and zealous audiophiles, nevertheless it is important for teens and young adults to understand where the electronics industry started from.

    I'm all in favor of broad knowledge, but really, what *possible* lesson does someone learn from knowing about vacuum tubes? Talk about an esoteric subject!

    There really are a limited number of hours in the classroom, and too many subjects are given short shrift as it is. My pet peeve is that schools don't teach true drawing and art skills (ANYONE can learn to draw realistically). It makes me crazy that what they call "art" in class these days is kids slapping paint on a canvas in imitation of some masterwork. It's like having the kids copy down mathematical symbols with no understanding and making it "look like" they're doing math.

    But I digress. Anyone that is interested in the history of electronics will naturally seek it out. Studying the historical influence of radios is important. Studying the history of what exactly made the radio work is not.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  23. ah yes! by rucs_hack · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Bae.... No! Please! not the spikes!!!

  24. He not only made the tube, by Toinou · · Score: 5, Informative

    he also made all the necessary equipment, like vacuum pump. If you are interested in tubes, he says the "musée des arts et métiers" is a reference. This is an engeneering museum in Paris, which has an incredible collection. When I go there, I stay for hours. Do not mistake it with the science, the nature science, or the technology museum (which are also quite interesting).

    1. Re:He not only made the tube, by dido · · Score: 1

      Is that the museum where we see Casaubon hiding at the beginning of Umberto Eco's Foucault's Pendulum? Where the TRES have their rite?

      --
      Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    2. Re:He not only made the tube, by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      I believe it is, but it's been a long time since I last visited or read that book.

    3. Re:He not only made the tube, by fsmunoz · · Score: 1

      Is that the museum where we see Casaubon hiding at the beginning of Umberto Eco's Foucault's Pendulum? Where the TRES have their rite? It is; it's were in the beginning the young couple is discussing the Pendulum experiment in rather cold terms, and where TRES makes the final rite with Belbo... I have found this link amongst others, wich both mentiones the pendulum an a "Découvre le béton" workshop... something aking to the "Amazing History of Metals". Coincidence? Ha!

      Great catch by the way.
    4. Re:He not only made the tube, by Toinou · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can see a pendulum in the church of the museum, with demonstration of it. The site of the museum is great, sadly it is only in french.

    5. Re:He not only made the tube, by ei4anb · · Score: 1

      "When I go there, I stay for hours."
      Did you hide in the periscope? It's gone now.

    6. Re:He not only made the tube, by fmobus · · Score: 1

      Or, you could just go to the the Panthéon and see the real thing =P (sort-of: the original iron ball was moved elsewhere in 1995)

  25. Only the EL34 and EL84 are pentodes... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    , and only in their original European forms. Their US equivalents, 6CA7 and 6BQ5, are constructed as beam power tetrodes.

    The 6L6 is also not a pentode, but the very first beam power tetrode.

    The 12AX7 is a dual triode.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  26. Interesting idea. by jd · · Score: 1

    Nature's techno-science hacks are all Bohr-ing. However, shouldn't naked vaccuum tubes be in Pentode Magazine?

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  27. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    there are places where vacuum tubes are still used, some radio stations use them in their transmitters, i was once inside the local AM radio station in my home town and the vacuum tube was as big in circumference as a dinner plate and about 18 inches tall, so there still is some commercial/professional demand for them...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  28. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by KC1P · · Score: 1

    No kidding, it's like assembly language for hardware! Even if people were making transistors at home (are they? hmmmmm), there wouldn't be much to see, so tubes are cool because the magical theoretical guts that you read about in books are right there for you to see inside a glass bubble.

    Well, except for the parts that are silvered over (in commercial tubes) that is -- huh, I wonder if that means the home-made tubes are leaking radiation all over the place. Still worth it though (but to be on the safe side we'd better not make M. Paillard angry). The plate (the little cylinder he made first) presumably catches almost everything, so just stay away from the top and bottom.

    Anyway I'm totally blown away, this is SO cool! All those jigs and fixtures, it must have taken a huge amount of work to develop his method. I like how casting the plastic base was almost an afterthought. It would probably take me a year just to figure that part out. What a great guy!

  29. I'll Out-Retro You by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh yeah? Well, I built a wheel out of popcicle sticks!

  30. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some of us old-timers actually did this as part of an EE course in the early 1960's - we had to put together a simple triade, getter it and then measure its characteristis

  31. old radios by phrostie · · Score: 1

    very cool

    i have two old shortwaves that i'd love to get working again.

  32. flash sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it would be nice if some kind soul would post a non-flash version of the video

    1. Re:flash sucks by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Flash doesn't such but stupid mobile devices that don't support it DO suck. No matter what video will always require a plug-in. Flash works well for video so people will continue to use it. Get used to it and push for flash support on your devices.

    2. Re:flash sucks by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How about instead we push for the Flash source code to be opened up?

      If it's gonna 'take over' the Internet, it should be an open standard. I should be able to build the Flash Player the same way I build Seamonkey.

    3. Re:flash sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Or... use GNASH. Plays that video fine (n.b. you might have to use the latest version, not version in Debian/stable).

    4. Re:flash sucks by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      Flash doesn't such but stupid mobile devices that don't support it DO suck. No matter what video will always require a plug-in. Flash works well for video so people will continue to use it. Get used to it and push for flash support on your devices. 1) Flash sucks because half the web ads out there (especially ones that have stupid special effects that take over the entire page when you mouse over them. I'm looking at you slashdot) are Flash files. No Flash means fewer ads. And no wiz bang in your face ads either.
      2) Flash video on the mac sucks ass. Sure we technically have Flash, but you need some high end hardware to get good Flash video frame rates, making it next to useless on lower end hardware. Quicktime, DiVX, and even WMV files play just fine on my lowly iBook, but I get like 4 fps out of flash X_X.
      3) Have you seen the iPhone version of youtube? It's not flash, but h.264. Apple is pushing for open standards (something echoed in another comment) on the internet. Flash isn't open, h.264 is. Regardless, some of the videos on youtube look better anyway.
      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    5. Re:flash sucks by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      You can actually get hold of the Flash player Source Code. However, before doing so, you have to attend the kind of interview that makes the interview for a bank loan look like a pleasant afternoon chit-chat, and then sign -- in blood -- a document offering your soul to Adobe, including promising never to breathe a word of it to another living soul and never to program anything again.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    6. Re:flash sucks by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      If you can get hold of the underlying .flv file, then you should be able to view this using ffplay (which is part of the ffmpeg package). With a bit of luck, this will be visible in the source code view. In the worst case, you may need a Linux box you don't mind temporarily polluting with Caged software, just to run the Flash player and tcpflow together so you can see where the .flv file is being picked up from.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    7. Re:flash sucks by sremick · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume the person you're replying to has a mobile device which is the source of his/her problem?

      While you are correct that many mobile devices don't support Flash, that's not the main reason that Flash sucks. Flash sucks because it's a proprietary data type which puts content at the mercy of whatever OSes and devices that Adobe feels bothered to bless with a Flash player. Perhaps the user was on a non-mobile OS that doesn't have a Flash player (FreeBSD?). Maybe s/he just hates Flash for many other perfectly-valid reasons. The Wii, for example, is stuck with an old version of Flash. You think Adobe cares? You can "push" Adobe all you like but the fact remains that unless you're running a Windows or Mac desktop/laptop, you're not important to them.

      Adobe shouldn't have a stranglehold on internet content with Flash for the same reason Microsoft shouldn't with proprietary HTML in IE.

      And no, video does NOT require a plug-in to play. Video can play just fine with a standalone video player. Or were you not aware that these existed and assumed a web browser was the only way to play videos, MP3s, and use email?

    8. Re:flash sucks by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      I meant embedded video but whatever. The point is some kind of add on program be it a plug-in or a standalone player is required to play all video.

    9. Re:flash sucks by sremick · · Score: 1

      Well no kidding. Some sort of "add-on program" is necessary to view a JPEG too. The person you responded to was specifically requesting a stand-alone standard video file format, versus an embedded Flash video. Since, as has been stated by many people, Flash sucks.

    10. Re:flash sucks by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Jpeg support has shipped with browsers since I was a freshman in high school (circa 1995) or maybe earlier. What are you talking about?

    11. Re:flash sucks by Crizp · · Score: 1

      1) People would just go back to animated GIFs taking more space and time to download.
      2) OK I agree that flash video sucks and is slow in general, not just on the Mac.
      3) Flash supports h.264, it's not just for the Mac.

    12. Re:flash sucks by sremick · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're totally missing my point.

      You said:

      "The point is some kind of add on program be it a plug-in or a standalone player is required to play all video."

      Not sure why you're wasting your time getting confused.... that's a given for any video/picture/music/etc filetype. Like JPEG. They don't open themselves. They need a program to open them. No shit that browsers can open JPEG files. So can a stand-alone image viewer. That's my point.

      The user doesn't like Flash, for legitimate reasons. It's not a standard way to play video. Standard video file formats (DivX, MPEG, etc) can be played with standard players. Web browsers aren't inherently video-file playing applications... hence they need special plug-ins. Using a web browser plus a plug-in to play a simple video is like using a can-opener attachment for your Kitchen-Aid mixer just to open cans, when it'd be far-simpler and more-practical to just use a stand-alone can opener.

      Flash sucks, and videos are better if made available for download. Flash is not standard and not anywhere near as widely-available as DivX/MPEG/etc video players.

    13. Re:flash sucks by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Flash might suck for some reasons, but for Video.. Well, I didn't love the idea of using Flash for video, but there's a reason it got so popular.

      Internet streaming video any other way was a DISASTER, and still is. Half the sites that use Windows Media fail because they don't work through proxy servers, or there's some firewall issue, or whatever. Other sites use Real, and hardly anyone had RealPlayer - and some didn't want that Ad-ware crap. Yet more still used Quicktime, with the same problem as Real with installed base, and unreliability (not in the software itself, but the ability to successfully video an internet video.)

      Flash virtually solved all those issues in one fell swoop. If you have a recent version of Flash (almost all systems do) and you can get to the web server, you can watch the video. No magic media protocols or difficult streaming server requirements.

      PS. I never had a problem with Flash on my Hackintosh Tiger box. It's just an Opteron 165 (2.2Ghz) nothing fancy.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    14. Re:flash sucks by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the iPhone version of youtube? It's not flash, but h.264.

      .flv is just MPEG-4 video (or maybe H.264 now) and VBR MP3 audio muxed into yet another container format. If you can get an HTTP URL for the video you want (KeepVid works well with YouTube), you can download the video with Firefox or wget, play it with mplayer, transcode to a more sensible format with mencoder, etc. All that the iPhone's YouTube app is doing is automating some of these steps.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    15. Re:flash sucks by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      acording to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLV (yes i know, it's wikipedia, take a pound of salt if you must) only recent beta versions of flash support h.264. YouTube uses h.263 for it's web/flash front end. When YouTube rolled out on the AppleTV last year, it was announced that there was an agreement between Apple and YouTube that said that YouTube was transcoding a select few archives (and all new uploads) in h.264 for the AppleTV. iPhone just happens to use the same AppleTV friendly h.264 subset of YouTube. If you try to watch a YouTube movie on the iPhone that is not avalible in h.264, it doesn't transcode on the fly as you imply, but it gives an error about the movie not being avalible.

      Thats right. The high quality YouTube on the iPhone is only a subset of the entire YouTube video library.

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
  33. It does not even need to be this complex by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Informative
    Even teaching basic semiconductor stuff is simple.

    My kids and I built a crystal set and made a cats whisker diode for it using some brass sheet, wire and a lump of galena (from the mineral & crystal shop). Also made a diode with a rusty razor blade and another with a lump of silicon. These didn't work as well as shop germanium diodes, but they still worked. Made our own variable capacitors using paper and tin foil too.

    You can even build simple amplifiers etc using tunnel diodes: http://home.earthlink.net/~lenyr/ntype-nr.htm

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:It does not even need to be this complex by flajann · · Score: 1

      Ah, tunnel diodes! I loved playing with them when I was a kid! Brings back some fond memories...

  34. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It will also serve to bring us back after the collapse of society and technology.

    Id like to see you make semiconductor based transistors in your basement.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  35. American musician by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be Gershwin buddy. An American composer. "The Man I love", people just don't know the classics anymore do they. I mention Gershwin and people look at me blankly. I'm a young guy to. So sad.

    http://www.gershwin.com/

  36. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    yeah because solid state components that can handle the power and frequency involved in a big radio transmitter are even more expensive than vacuum tubes that can.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  37. Glass/Metal seals... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you look closely at the wires he is sealing into the glass "press", you will see a short reddish-brown section. This is most likely "dumet", or copper coated nickel/iron. This material is specially designed to have the same coefficient of thermal expansion as glass, and was used as the sealing material in most receiving tubes. The copper coating forms an oxide layer that dissolves into the glass, creating a vacuum-tight seal.

    Before the development of dumet, kovar, and other specialized alloys, the seals in very early tubes were made using platinum wire. Cost considerations brought this to a quick end, as soon as cheaper suitable materials were developed.

    The electrodes in later tubes were often coated with various materials to aid heat dissipation or reduce secondary electron emission. Early tubes that were similar in construction to what is being made here generally used plain metal grids and plates.

    Most tubes contained a "getter" made of barium or other reactive metal, to adsorb any gas molecules which survived initial pumpdown, or which were liberated from the internal elements during operation.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    1. Re:Glass/Metal seals... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Platinum wire is used with Standard Cells. But Standard Cells themselves have become rather obscure items.

  38. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The silvering has nothing to do with radiation. It is a thin coating of reactive metal to take up any oxygen left in the tube after it has been sealed. If you ever find an old tube where the silver patch has gone white, it is gassy and will not work properly. (It may work to some degree but is also likely to have a strange glow from ionising the gas. Depends how much gas has leaked in.)

    You do get X-rays from tubes working at high voltages, but they are of pretty low energy in typical applications and probably don't make it out through the glass. TV tubes use leaded glass to reduce the X-radiation.

  39. Not just them. by jd · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Thermionic valves have vastly superior tolerance to electromagnetic radiation, acceleration, shocks, and other hostile conditions. The power they can push through is astonishing. On the flip-side, their mean time between failures isn't always so great, they're bulkier, they use more power, and it can be very hard to find some of the older lines.

    If you wanted to build some part of an embedded device that absolutely had to take some really ugly conditions, you could do a whole lot worse than to build that specific module using valves. Let's say you wanted to build a new module for the IIS, for example. The internal circuits can largely be protected, so conventional radiation-proof chips would be fine. However, if you wanted reliable computing elements that could be strapped to the outside of the pod, you've harsh conditions indeed. Lead-smothered rad-hardened silicon chips that can handle space tolerances and have their own heating elements would probably work. Lots of things that can go wrong, though. Complexity-wise and weight-wise you're probably not significantly better off than using thermionic valves with none of the extras.

    Where else could valves be used? Easy. If the cathode and anode are deliberately mis-aligned, then one or more grids must be set to a value such that the directed power completes the circuit. If something goes wrong (too much power, something fails, whatever), then the beam is either not pushed at all or pushed far too far. In either case, you've an all-electronic circuit-breaker - ideal if you want to get rid of fuseboxes and mechanical trip-switches.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Not just them. by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      The reliability problem of valves was solved may years ago. It was down to the silicon that was added to the tungsten to make it easier to work with. If you go with pure tungsten and absorb the high manufacturing costs. Basically if you use high purity components, you can get operating life's of hundreds of thousands of hours from a vacuum tube.

  40. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by DeathElk · · Score: 5, Informative

    The purpose of using vacuum tubes in a guitar amp is for the overdrive characteristics. When overdriven, solid state amplification circuitry clips the waveform to the voltage rails, resulting in a harsh sounding distortion due to the dissonant overtones.

    A tube amp driven to distortion compresses the waveform rather than hard clipping. This results in a waveform rich in harmonic overtones - the classic distorted guitar sound.

    Any person who is not tone deaf can tell the difference between solid state distortion and tube distortion. Please don't compare the basic principles of rock guitar with overpriced audiophile folly.

  41. State of the Art by localroger · · Score: 4, Informative
    Limping through the writeup with what's left of my high school French I get the idea that he's not just making homemade tubes, he's duplicating a particular class of historic tubes which were common around WWI. He's using authentic techniques. These tubes were handmade at great expense because they were used for maritime communication where price was no object, and modern standards of longetivity didn't apply; if such a tube lasted 500 hours it was doing great. Also, some of those tubes had soft vacuum so an imperfect seal wasn't such a big deal.

    I do have to say this is one of the most impressive projects of its type I've ever seen; it's clearly a labor of both love and skill.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
  42. Semiconductors never could have been made without by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 4, Informative

    vacuum tubes.

    Once you get beyond the crude PN junction diode (like a galena crystal), making transistors and such requires ridiculously pure germanium and/or silicon. These materials are purified by a process called "zone refining" which uses induction heating to melt the semiconductor materials at incredibly high temperatures. Induction heating in turn requires many kilowatts of radio frequency power, which is exactly the type of application where vacuum tubes are still widely used even today.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  43. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Scaba · · Score: 2, Informative

    A tube amp driven to distortion compresses the waveform rather than hard clipping. This results in a waveform rich in harmonic overtones - the classic distorted guitar sound.

    Especially when it's one of these played through one of these.

  44. Next project ... by PPH · · Score: 0

    ... a homemade triggered spark gap.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  45. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Linker3000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The 'silvering' in most tubes isn't a screen but is caused by a process called 'gettering' where a small amount of a magnesium or calcium-based compound is burnt off (evaporated) by an external induction coil as part of the final manufacturing process. As the valve is 'gettered', the magnesium/calcium 'cleans out' any small traces of gas left in the envelope.

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  46. Re:"French amateur radio operator" by The_Rook · · Score: 4, Funny

    take that homebrew computer club! i'll bet none of those guys ever made their own transistors!

    --
    when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
  47. yay! by Elsapotk421 · · Score: 2, Funny

    maybe now I can make my own interwebs!

    --
    We came,we saw, we kicked it's ass!
  48. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can learn a hell of a lot from vacuum tubes! They are far easier to understand than transistors.

    There's a reason why they're called "valves" in the UK. It's like a valve controlling a powerful stream of water; a small change on the valve leads to a very large change of current. That change in current can, in turn, control a much bigger valve that controls an even larger current.

    In this case, the "valve" is a control grid (that spiral thing) surrounding the cathode (the thin hot wire in the middle). The big cylinder is the "plate". The cathode itself has a cloud of electrons around it (because it's hot), and a small signal on the grid controls how much of that can scoot across to the plate (which is positively charged due to a power supply putting a strong positive voltage on it). So a weak sine wave signal on the plate will lead to a big sine wave current from the plate.

    There, now you know the basics of amplification (although I skipped some details). I couldn't have done it by describing a BJT (transistor), because they're far weirder.

  49. WWII - hand assembled tubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My grandmother in Massachusetts tells stories about working in a vacuum tube factory during World War II (Raytheon maybe?). At the time, vacuum tubes did require some manual assembly. The process was not fully automated.

  50. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "While vacumn tubes are strictly in the realm of hobbyists and zealous audiophiles"...

    Right...like all professional musicians who use an electric guitar are "zealous audiophiles".

    remember, vacuum tubes are used in modern appliances, like your microwave ( yes, your magnetron is technically a vacuum tube ), CRT anything ( TV, monitor etc ), high power radio transmitters, guitar amps ( the good ones ).....Claude makes much more than just triodes, see the end section of his video.

  51. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I'm by all accounts a nerd and I loved shop class. I took shop because it was one of the few classes in school where I actually learned something. I took shop every single year starting in elementary school on till I graduated.

    I now have a computer science degree (didn't learn anything new in college either and no shop classes went towards my degree, pffft) and I own two software companies today.

  52. No doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No doubt, that should the world ever go through a post-apocalyptic phase, the French will emerge as the new superpower thanks to their ability to recreate lost technology and their military prowess. Oh, wait..

  53. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure it was a joke. That's the obsessive hobby of many a slashdotter.

  54. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Sanat · · Score: 1

    Please mod up comment by the parent. It is right on.

    As an addition...
    When vacuum tubes were used in computers the defective tubes would often have a blue glow indicating a gassy condition and those were changed out first.

    --
    And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
  55. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Ptraci · · Score: 1

    The company I work for makes an RF power delivery system that uses them, and they are still used in broadcast amplifiers. There's still a need to teach about vacuum tube circuits for other than hobbyist applications.

  56. Quick technical question... by Zapotek · · Score: 1

    ...about the vacuum part.
    There's got to a gas of some kind in there right?
    I mean there's got to be some pressure in the tubes otherwise they'd snap due to atmospheric pressure.
    So my question is this, what's in them?

    1. Re:Quick technical question... by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      A quick answer while we wait for someone who knows more: Nope, they're pretty-much empty, as far as I know; the glass is strong enough.

    2. Re:Quick technical question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think they'd snap? What gives the idea that you know something that a century of vacuum tubes shows you otherwise? Of course there's a total vacuum in there! Of course they don't "snap", why should they? Did your TV? Or your monitor?
      I have 50 year old tubes in my lab gear and the vacuum is still as good as the day they were made. Why would you think otherwise?
      It's baffling.

    3. Re:Quick technical question... by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      Parent seems to think 1 atm is a very large pressure to deal with. That's incorrect, but I can't blame him, as there are plenty of high-school science demos that suggest otherwise (Example).

    4. Re:Quick technical question... by agingell · · Score: 3, Informative

      The pressure is not really that great 1Atm is about 14 pounds per square inch, with a cylinder and hemispherical shape you can withstand incredible pressures, you just cannot have any weak spots.
      Bicycle tyres are inflated to up to 80 pounds per square inch.

      A submarine has to undergo far greater pressures, even though the air is kept at say 1 Atm internally the pressure underwater goes up by 1Atm per 10m depth so the pressure at say 915m depth would be 1316 pounds per square inch! (record manned sub with full crew 1968)

    5. Re:Quick technical question... by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Oh noes! 26 337 827 tons per square mile! We're doomed!

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    6. Re:Quick technical question... by mwilliamson · · Score: 1

      We live at 14 psi.

  57. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The last time (about 10 years ago) I had to take a big radio frequency amplifier apart (1 kW continuous wave, 2 kW in pulsed mode, so not really hobbyist stuff but in a physics lab, too expensive for all but the very wealthy hobbyists) it had lots of vaccum tubes inside and I don't think that has changed too much since then, the next one we bought (for higher RF powers) also had tubes... Admittedly, it weren't those nice looking (low power) ones with glass covers but in ceramic casings (but then the voltages required also were a bit higher, some kV were needed - and, yes, I accidentally touched something in there with a screw driver - it flew somehwere in the lab and we never found it;-).

  58. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

    I'd disagree. See the computer science article below! Schools have fallen into the rut of teaching technology by rote.. and not by experience. Heck if CS students brushed up on their binary, they could MAKE a computer from what he's doing!!! True, it's not useful by itself by today's standard, but the Experience of doing it all from scratch would be fantastic!!!

  59. Re:"French amateur radio operator" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What is it with acting like foreign nationals are some sort of trained monkey?

    French amateur radio operator

    Freedom amateur radio operator...
    There, fixed it for you.
  60. oblig cartoon reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    trained cheese eating surrender monkeys

  61. So thats how the internet works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its just a series of these "tube" things... Makes a lot more sense now.

  62. "Sometimes you need to reinvent the wheel... by ciaohound · · Score: 3, Insightful

    not because you need wheels, but because you need inventors." Not sure who first said that.

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
  63. Your word-a-day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is it with acting like foreign nationals are some sort of trained monkey? C'mon folks. M. Paillard would be a "foreign national" if he were a Frenchman who is temporarily living or working in the U.S.

    But since he is a Frenchman in France, he is just a regular old foreigner. Or, as one might say in my local dialect, a 'furriner'.
  64. The ironic part by Ironchew · · Score: 0

    All the HDTV people on Slashdot keep on telling me the days of analog broadcast are over. I mean, what could possibly be the advantage of analog? User-serviceable? Psh. We should consume and throw away!

  65. Instruments of Amplification by Sen.NullProcPntr · · Score: 1

    take that homebrew computer club! i'll bet none of those guys ever made their own transistors! Making integrated circuits (ICs) might be a better analogy.

    Haven't read it but this book claims to show you how to make your own vacuum tubes AND transistors!
  66. Re:"French amateur radio operator" by oddaddresstrap · · Score: 1

    "What is it with acting like foreign nationals are some sort of trained monkey?"
    It comes from not wanting to admit that in comparison to Monsieur Paillard, we are the monkeys. And untrained to boot.

  67. Getter by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

    Most tubes contained a "getter" made of barium or other reactive metal, to adsorb any gas molecules which survived initial pumpdown, or which were liberated from the internal elements during operation.

    I wondered why he seemed to power up the filament until it glowed white hot like an incendescent lamp, while pumping the air out. I guess he must have been trying to sacrifice a little of the filament's metal to help burn off the last remaining oxygen that the pumpdown can't get out.

    1. Re:Getter by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He was superheating the entire structure to drive out occluded gases from the metal components. During this operation, the entire tube was surrounded by a coil driven by an induction heater, which was heating the plate and grid red hot, as well. All this takes place while the tube is attached to the vacuum pump, prior to sealoff.

      I am not sure what material he was using for his filament wire, but if it was thoriated tungsten, then the "hot shot" cycle also serves to build up a surface layer of thorium oxide on the filament, and reduce it to metallic thorium. Thorium has a much lower work function than pure tungsten, and will emit electrons efficiently at a much lower operating temperature.

      Yes, I am a tube geek...:) Years ago, I made a much cruder triode in a peanut butter jar as a HS physics project.

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  68. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can learn a hell of a lot from vacuum tubes! They are far easier to understand than transistors.

    For someone studying electronics, I agree. But as a general subject? Why not teach the theory on how they used to slop pigs 100 years ago? Or the techniques for cutting hair? Or pick your esoteric piece of knowledge that is utterly useless to 99% of students.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  69. Big valves are still used today by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Large medium wave radio transmitters still use thermionic valves in their output stages. Solid state electronics have trouble handling megawatt power levels.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Big valves are still used today by eclectro · · Score: 1

      Their days are increasingly numbered. It seems there is a solid state equivalent for everything these days, including high power medium wave RF transmitters. Probably the next to last vestige of the tube, after CFLs. But even those might go with the way LEDs are improving. No tube is safe. It's hard to believe but true.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:Big valves are still used today by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Well, they don't - electric railway locomotives have had solid state controls for some time (and a 6000 hp loco is around 4.5 megawatts at full chat). I suspect semiconductors just haven't (yet) been built to run that sort of power at radio frequency... but they are on their way.

    3. Re:Big valves are still used today by Desert+Tripper · · Score: 1

      Don't forget High-Voltage DC (HVDC) power transmission. The technology was invented using giant mercury-arc valves (a history lesson in themselves) and is now carried out in most places using strings of thyristors in series. There's an 800-mile link in the West from Bonneville Dam, WA to Sylmar, CA that has a capacity of 3000 megawatts at a million volts DC (plus and minus 500kV.) The website of ABB http://www.abb.com/ (one of the pioneers in this technology) has lots of interesting info. It is amazing what they were able to do with those mercury arc tubes. I talked to a guy who used to maintain stuff at the Sylmar station and he said there was a guy who would disassemble the tubes and repair the grids and anodes. (The cathode was the pool of Hg.) He was said to be able to weld a beer can! I bet he would make good friends with the French guy... Sadly, the demise of the mercury tubes was simply that due to the age of the system, parts were less and less available (not to mention the ever-growing hysteria about the presence of Hg.) How I would have loved to see that system in operation! Thyristors are cool to look at, but like most solid state stuff, it just sits there and looks the same whether it is running or not.

  70. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

    check out some of the lathe-enthusiast videos on youtube, ie.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qt5tthfk59U

    this fella has a bunch of interesting stuff, check out his other videos as well

    http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=gmark1953&p=r

  71. Get ready to partay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note that this is the centennial year of the invention of the humble triode. Actually, next month if this article's mention of US Patent 879,532 is correct.

    1. Re:Get ready to partay by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Neat. Let's have a Triode party. How do you celebrate world Triode Day? (and what day is Triode Day?)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  72. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by leenks · · Score: 1

    In the UK this is due to league tables. Why teach kids how to do something for the rest of their lives if they might end up messing up in a known-format test? Bad results in that test result in the school being shunned by parents, even as far as moving their kids to other schools, sending the schools into "special measures" and ultimately affecting salaries and teacher motivation.

    No, it's much better to teach the kids how to pass the tests and only the tests. That way the parents are happy because little Johnny got 98% in his tests! As parents don't need to invest time with their kids - that's what schools, nanny's and the xbox360 are for as everyone seems to know these days - they'll never find out how little their children know until too late.

  73. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    > For someone studying electronics, I agree. But as a general subject? Why not teach the theory on how they used to slop pigs 100 years ago? Or the techniques for cutting hair? Or pick your esoteric piece of knowledge that is utterly useless to 99% of students.

    And what, pray tell, would be "useful" to 99% of students? I'm trying to think of something that you'd consider useful, and I'm failing.

    In electronics, how transistors work is pretty fundamental. In agriculture, understanding the differences in how pigs (well, cows) were fed 100 years ago versus today is pretty fundamental to understanding prion diseases, as is the "useless, esoteric" story about the disease of "kuru" among the cannibals of New Zealand. Teach geology without the "trivia" that earthquakes and plate tectonics are inextricably linked to the shape of the continents on either side of the Atlantic ocean, and that the guy who came up with the idea was laughed at until they found the ridge in the middle of the Atlantic ocean? Teach hairdressing without talking about the greasers of the 50s, the afros of the 60s, the perms of the 70s, and the mohawks of the 80s?

    Useless is in the mind of the beholden.

  74. if you ever had a cathode-ray tube implode on you. by swschrad · · Score: 2, Informative

    you wouldn't have asked. that glow is vacuum. good old vacuum.

    gas-filled tubes typically flash over as the gas starts conducting, typically violet for argon, bright yellow for hydrogen. because of the flashover point at some voltage, gas tubes are generally trigger tubes or voltage regulators.

    glass in CRTs typically is thick enough to withstand tons and tons of atmospheric pressure. sometimes, they don't. that is rather spectacular, unless you are touching the glass, in which case is is amputational.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  75. you might have noticed the plate red hot in a coil by swschrad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "refining" a tube typically meant heating it up in an inductive system to burn out impurities and gas in the tube elements, and filaments may or may not also be heated up at that time. typically were. getters are often "flashed" with a high voltage impressed on them during this period to be sure the impurities are fully absorbed and can't get back into the tube metals and glass spacers.

    many getters at the period in which that tube type he's duplicating used phosphorus. not as efficient as aluminum and barium, but easier to flash over. WWI, remember, you couldn't pull much vacuum. the getter had to do the job. so old tubes had funny colors inside from the getter flashover.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  76. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

    In agriculture, understanding the differences in how pigs (well, cows) were fed 100 years ago versus today is pretty fundamental to understanding prion diseases, as is the "useless, esoteric" story about the disease of "kuru" among the cannibals of New Zealand. That story about kuru and the cannibals of New Zealand certainly is useless and esoteric as it was the cannibals of Papua New Guinea that had kuru.
  77. thanks by meeya · · Score: 1

    thanks kdawson . this is more a tutorial. this guy is amazing. i learned a lot.

  78. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    If someone told me that it would take around 300 million tubes to make an Intel Core2Duo CPU, I would appreciate the vast complexity that goes into making microchips.

    No, I'll never make scoff at vacuum tube technology. After all, you must realize you have to get from "there" before you can get to "here".

    BTW, the cheapest Core2Duo lists for $124.99 new. How many tubes will that buy me?

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  79. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah because solid state components that can handle the power and frequency involved in a big radio transmitter are even more expensive than vacuum tubes that can.

    There's also high-power applications with short-duty cycles. These use tubes because tubes must be rated for the average power, while solid-state components must be rated for the peak power. In some applications the ratio of the two can exceed 10,000 to 1.

  80. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by ynososiduts · · Score: 1

    Some of us audiophiles are a bit more sensible than that. I appreciate a good pair of headphones, and vaccum tubes in the signal chain add a certain distortion that just can't be reproduced using solid state stuff.

    --
    622677120
  81. Mod Parent Up by plasticsquirrel · · Score: 1

    Just about every serious guitarist still uses tube amps. They're not esoteric or ancient at all for this purpose, because they're the best tool for the job. Although digital models of tube amps have improved, nothing sounds quite like the real thing.

    --
    Systemd: the PulseAudio of init systems
  82. Homemade FETs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Scientific American Amateur Scientist column
      Transistors. how to make thin film,
            1970 Jun, pg 141

  83. Here you go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  84. Vacuum tubes were pretty much ALL hand-made.... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    , as sophisticated robotics didn't yet exist. The most sophisticated part of tube making, the assembly of the internal components or "mount" was done largely by hand, usually by rows and rows of women (smaller fingers) hunched over microscopes in dust-free rooms.

    Once the mounts were assembled and welded onto the stems, the sealing into bulb and pumping down was somewhat automated. Done on a machine called a "sealex", the mounts would be inserted into bulbs, sealed in place, evacuated, heated to activate the cathodes, sealed off, and getters flashed, with each operation taking place at a different "station" on the sealex.

    An interesting photo essay on the construction of the famous 300B audio triode is available here:

    http://www.westernelectric.com/history/tour01.html

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  85. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Swampash · · Score: 1

    While vacumn tubes are strictly in the realm of hobbyists and zealous audiophiles...

    Almost all modern guitar amplifiers are valve-powered.

  86. I'm impressed by s_p_oneil · · Score: 4, Funny

    He actually found a use for those tiny scissors that come with a Swiss Army Knife.

  87. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Cadallin · · Score: 0
    Piss off Wanker. You're an ignorant Jackass.

    As DeathElk notes, there are well characterized reasons well founded in Electrical Engineering for why tube amplifiers sound better overdriven. The reason is that while transistors and ICs go non-linear in their amplification very suddenly, tubes go non-linear gradually over a range. Thus instead of the harsh clipping behavior solid state equipment exhibit, tubes produce distortion that is often considered very musical.

    Note that while there do exist amplifiers that use DSP simulations to attempt to provide the same effect without tubes, these simulations are widely considered very poor, or at best inadequate.

  88. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i was kidding. and i forgot to type 'hand-made $500 volume knob"

    i should have clicked preview :(

    I know that tubes give a different sound. I used to work in a small recording studio, (well, specializing in making demo tapes, rather than professional recordings) One of the bass amps (can't remember brand/model, sorry) had a switch for either solid state or vacuum tube distortion (and it's no simulation or filter, there are real vacuum tubes in there)

      A lot of analogue gear gives much better distortion than any new solid state stuff. a lot of old people find that digital clipping sounds terrible. (while I like it)
    When i'm recording drums, I often put the mics just a little too close, record things just a little too hot, and record to tape. I move the analogue recording to my hard drive later. It makes them sound so much bigger/fuller.
    With guitar, i find i could get away with recording clean electric guitar, then throw on some VST filters later to make it sound just like an effects pedal, but if they wanted that warm tube sound, no filter came close enough, I had to actually use real, physical gear.

    vintage vacuum tubes are so hard to fund when they burn out, who would have though a DIY approach would be a viable option. cool!

    --
    -I only code in BASIC.-
  89. Guitar amp tubes... by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

    Well, that and they "go to 11".

  90. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    It will also serve to bring us back after the collapse of society and technology. Id like to see you make semiconductor based transistors in your basement.

    You aren't going to make [useful] vacuum tubes in your basement without considerable technological support either.
  91. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Technician · · Score: 2, Informative

    Any person who is not tone deaf can tell the difference between solid state distortion and tube distortion. Please don't compare the basic principles of rock guitar with overpriced audiophile folly.

    Much of the overpriced is going away along with tube microphonics, gassy tubes, high voltage resistors, capacitors and high power consumption. With Digital Signal Processing DSP is rapidly providing 24 bit 40KHZ or higher modeling of the classic sounds without the problems and high cost. The overdrive curve of tubes can easly be modeled in a DSP.

    http://emusician.com/dsp/studio_devil_virtual_guitar_amp/
    http://www.analog.com/processors/tigersharc/overview/customerstories/fractalAudio/fractalAudioIndex.html
    http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/FM15DSP/

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  92. Done! by Hartree · · Score: 1

    We did it in 1993 in a junior level physics lab class at the University of New Mexico.

    John Panitz was the prof teaching it, and I was his TA for the class. We took them through basic metal forming, vacuum technology, glass blowing, molding a plastic, etc.

    The tubes were a bit different, as the students modified them during the semester and they needed to be opened repeatedly. We used Torr Seal to mold a base for them and used an o-ring seal between it and the glass envelope (we kept them attached to a running rough pump to keep them evacuated out enough to work). They started out as diodes, they added a grid to make them triodes. We had them do I-V curves on them and then they built amplifiers with them. They weren't nearly as elegant as the ones shown in the video, but they worked. The forming techniques we used were pretty similar, though we didn't use all the custom jigs.

    Finally, they each deposited a phosphor screen on a metal disk that they had machined. They gutted the triodes and put the disk into the envelope along with some of the remaining electrodes to act as emission points. They then put a high voltage between the phosphor disk and the electrodes and demonstrated field emission.

    I still think it was one of the best undergrad physics lab courses I've ever seen. The students had enough skills to be immediately useful in real lab work after it was done.

  93. Nah. by Animats · · Score: 1

    No, tube manufacture was mechanized by the 1950s. You're looking at an outfit that makes tubes that sell for $600 each, for sale to audio nuts. Here's a 1952 article on a CRT assembly line. Vacuum tubes were made on machinery similar to that used to make light bulbs.

  94. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Technician · · Score: 1

    I couldn't have done it by describing a BJT (transistor), because they're far weirder.


    To make bipolar simpler, they are simply a current amplifier, not a voltage amplifier. Think power steering. You push some, the force is boosted in proportion to the push you provide. The low voltage current needed to drive them instead of a high impedance voltage is why much bi-polar stuff is low impedance.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  95. Re:"French amateur radio operator" by ari_j · · Score: 1

    This guy is one (admittedly massive) schematic diagram and a little bit of chemical electrical cell technology short of saving the world, iff certain apocalyptic events occur within his lifetime and he survives without any brain damage. He's one up on me.

  96. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by sxpert · · Score: 1

    it may be so at this particular point. however, vacuum tubes are, contrarily to transistors, impervious to the effects of EMP generated by an atomic weapon.

    if some dumbass ever decides to fsck the world up, you can say goodbye to that core 2 duo...

    the vacuum tube radio set will continue to chug along fine however

  97. also... H. P. Friedrich's "Voice of the Crystal" by Fmuctohekerr · · Score: 1
    I'm reading this guy's books right now... he's pretty cool too.

    http://www.hpfriedrichs.com/bks-votc.htm

    Also check "Instruments of Amplication"

    http://www.hpfriedrichs.com/bks-ioa.htm

    He builds tubes out of stuff you would find in a garbage can. Cool beans.

  98. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

    As an electrical engineer - hell yes, they should be taught. Probably not in-depth like transistors, but as a technology, the basics should at least be covered. I also happen to be somewhat of an amateur historian of electrical power systems, and there's a lot many of my fellow EE students could have learned from some amazingly old stuff. Simple and elegant are two concepts often lost on them, but not on the clever EEs of the late 1800s / early 1900s. I'm not saying that we should go back to using rotary converters and all manner of other cantankerous electromechanical contraptions, but there's a way of thinking to be learned from them.

  99. Intelligent Distortion (ID) by LandruBek · · Score: 3, Funny

    basic principles of rock guitar

    Well that's only your theory. I however believe in "intelligent distortion" (ID) and that's what I teach my kids thank you very much.
    --
    $META_SIG_JOKE
  100. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by curty · · Score: 1

    There's a reason why they're called "valves" in the UK. Before there were valves, there were relays. (For those who don't know, a relay is a device where a small current is used to activate an electromagnet and close a mechanical switch to pass a larger current)

    I recently visited the telegraphy museum at Porthcurno, in Cornwall, UK, where some of the earliest transatlantic cables came ashore. These would be thousands of miles long, driven by kilovolts at one end, but with only millivolts appearing at the other.

    Relays were used literally to relay signals between two stretches of cable. The small voltage available at the end of one cable was used to switch a much bigger voltage at the start of the next stretch. (An amplifier for binary signals, if you will.) Hence the name relay.

  101. Re:Thorium-??? by Slugster · · Score: 1

    The thorium was what I was wondering about too....

    When I took an interest in tube audio some years back, I asked why people didn't make their own tubes, and the problem of obtaining {or of home-manufacturing} thoriated tungsten filaments was the reason given. Without Thorium, the filaments don't last very long at typical power levels--and Thorium (at least, of the type needed) was pretty toxic, and quite radioactive besides.

    Lots of people (online) had built their own transformers--but I didn't hear from any who had really attempted to make a tube, that they were willing to actually wire into a project and expect to work very long.
    ~

  102. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by vilms · · Score: 0

    Thanks for this, AC.

    [You find the most useful information in some of the strangest, most unexpected Slashdot threads...]

  103. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    Gah! I invented solid-state tube emulation so long ago, if I'd thought to get a patent, it would have run out by today! Lowpass filter, A-to-D converter, data latch, bank of EPROMs, D-to-A converter. A-D provides low-order address bits for memory (which contains digitised transfer functions), data lines drive D-to-A converter. High-order address bits come from manually-operated switches allowing selection of different transfer characteristics.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  104. Kids today... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    This is nice to watch and all, but how exactly do people think vacuum tubes were made back in medieval times?

    A: Just like this...with people sat at machines.

    Most other manufactured goods were made the same way. The glass in old windows isn't distorted at the bottom because it flowed, it's distorted because it was made by somebody blowing down a metal pipe and swinging it around.

    Go back earlier and you'll find that glassblowing was an essential skill for all chemists and early electronics engineers had to make their own wire.

    Ten out of ten for style but he's not performing some miracle, he's just using the original methods.

    --
    No sig today...
  105. So how were the electron guns made? by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 2, Informative

    The article talks at great length about the manufacture of the CRT bulbs, and the exhaust process, both of which were easily automated, even back then. I talked about the automated "sealex" machines in my last post.

    But the heart of the CRT, the electron gun, with it's tiny metal components, was still hand assembled, by operators using microscopes and tiny resistance spot welders. Just the same as standard receiving tubes. The final assembly and evacuation lent itself to automation, but the intricate assembly of the "guts" did not.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  106. Re:Thorium-??? by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    Thoriated filaments were generally only used in early receiving tubes, and high-power transmitting tubes. They would probably be the easiest way to manufacture a usable tube in your basement, but they weren't general industry practice for audio tubes.

    Most audio/receiving types used either an oxide coated filament, or a separate, indirectly heated cathode. The filament/cathode was coated with a mixture of barium/strontium/calcium carbonates, which converted to the corresponding oxides during the heating and pumpdown process. The oxide layer emitted electrons at an even lower temperature than thoriated tungsten.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  107. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by dintech · · Score: 1

    Excatly, even if it's just from an academic perspective. For example, a lot of people are interested how they built such big pyramids. I imagine in the future there might be some interest in exactly how electronics worked without transistors. It's already interesting now.

  108. Re:"French amateur radio operator" by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

    What is it with acting like foreign nationals are some sort of trained monkey? C'mon folks.

    C'mon? He's French! Fill in the rest of this phrase: Cheese-eating surrender _________ .

    To be fair, the French are fantastic at sinking Greenpeace boats- can't really fault them for that.

    (No, I'm not serious, and no, I didn't RTFA)

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
  109. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    Don't forget that it's got even worse with the privatisation of the matriculation boards. Examinations are now set by competing private companies, who earn money depending on how many pupils are entered for examinations. Schools choose a matriculation board based on pass rates, so boards set examinations that are easy to pass.

    In the "bad" old days, you sent your kids to the school you were told to send them to (so you couldn't get social climbers skewing the statistics for the worse by withdrawing their little darlings from schools perceived as "bad"), and the matriculation boards were answerable to the universities (so passing grades really did mean you were able to go to uni). The abolition of the eleven-plus could never possibly have led to the stated aim of grammar school education for all. Instead, it has led to secondary-modern education for all. The chronic underinvestment {which was the real reason for the problems with the tripartite system: not enough money was spent on technical and sec.mod. schools} has not gone away. And it's even worse today with school buildings nearing the ends of their designed lifetimes and nobody wanting to become a teacher for fear of being branded a paedophile.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  110. too complicated by nguy · · Score: 1

    He is basically just doing what professional vacuum tube makers were doing, with lots of equipment and skill. It's nice to keep that craft alive, but it's not particularly amazing to me that with lots of skill and lots of equipment, you can make a vacuum tube. I'd find it impressive if someone came up with a way of making a vacuum tube with hardly any equipment or skill, some combination of glass, wire, and glue that doesn't require glass blowing or shaping.

    1. Re:too complicated by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      "I'd find it impressive if someone came up with a way of making a vacuum tube with hardly any equipment or skill, some combination of glass, wire, and glue that doesn't require glass blowing or shaping."

      Don't you remember that episode of McGyver, where he builds a vacuum tube cellphone jammer out of an old oatmeal carton, a match, and some barbed wire, and disables the remote controlled bomb 2 seconds before it was supposed to detonate?

      Me either, but damn, that would have been a good show.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    2. Re:too complicated by nguy · · Score: 1

      Well, you can make a diode or transistor out of pyrite. You may be able to build a cold cathode tube with just a bunch of wires and metal (no vacuum even). There's cheap high temperature glues that might be used to build and seal a vacuum tube without any glass blowing. I think there are lots of ways in which one can build traditional vacuum tubes cheaper, and lots of interesting new designs for tubes and solid state devices one might come up with.

  111. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by KudyardRipling · · Score: 1

    I am old enough to remember when television sets were all tube, even the high voltage rectifier was a tube. I DO remember seeing HVR (and some horizontal output) tubes enclosed in heavy sheet-metal boxes with either hinged or removable lids so as to shield down the resulting X-rays.

    --
    Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
  112. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Alioth · · Score: 1

    They do, they are called history lessons. We had to do the Industrial Revolution at school (history was a compulsory subject until we were around 14, IIRC). This isn't really any different from learning about the Industrial Revolution. I'm sure some schools taught agricultural history.

  113. topper by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

    that's nothing, I do semiconductor transistors at 45nm for fun during lunchbreak

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
  114. Astonishing! by iBod · · Score: 1

    The guy is a genius and nut-case!

    That little movie is really one of the best things I've ever seen on the net.

    The dedication, the craft. The art of it all.

    I'd hate to think how much one of these would cost. Probably their not for sale anyway, which is cool. They look fairly low-power devices so unsuitable for audio power amps where valves (tubes) are king. The application shown is as a detector/demodulator in a very retro TRF radio (I think) radio. Brilliant!

    These valves/tubes stand alone as sublime little works of art.

    I think that every teenage case-modder who thinks they are "leet" should watch this and cry into their Cheetos.

  115. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by polaris20 · · Score: 1

    Strictly the realm of hobbyists and zealous audiophiles? Do you listen to blues, jazz, rock, metal, pop, or alternative music? Then you're listening to the work of tubes. Serious guitarists, pro and amateur alike only use tube amps to get the best possible sound. The day that tubes cease to exist will be a sad day, because no combination of zeros and ones or some crappy solid state circuit can reproduce the sound of a good tube amp.

  116. Re:"French amateur radio operator" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    French amateur radio operator

    Freedom amateur radio operator...
    There, fixed it for you.


    France, freedom, whatever, same words anyway

  117. Re:also... H. P. Friedrich's "Voice of the Crystal by torqer · · Score: 1

    Anyone who fires glass with a torch and operates heavy machinery while wearing a sports jacket is cool in my books as well. Gotta love the French.

    Awesome video. It certainly didn't seem like it was 17 minutes long.

  118. DHS would be on him like... by e-scetic · · Score: 1

    I guess I'm so cynical now that my first thought as I watched the vid was this kind of gear would get him arrested in America. The bomb squad would be called in, they'd break stuff, they'd confiscate stuff, eventually they'd release him and return his equipment - but not before they'd charged him with a few frivolous things. Lord help him if he were living in Boston...

    But anyway, DOUBLE DAYUM AND A PUDDLE OF DROOL!

  119. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by iBod · · Score: 1

    God what a fucking stupid comment.

    Ok, I know this is Slashdot and stupid comments abound, but there's a limit, really!

    Vacuum tubes are a perfect illustration of electronic amplification. Far simpler to grasp and observe in action than semiconductor devices. They have unique and subtle characteristics which can't be replicated by transistors.

    This is equivalent to slopping out pigs a hundred years ago and useless to "99% of students" ?

  120. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

    This isn't really any different from learning about the Industrial Revolution.

    Studying the industrial revolution is about studying the *effects* on society from it. They don't waste time teaching exactly what the first steam engine looked like, and then looking how it changed and was improved over time.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  121. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

    God what a fucking stupid comment. [...] Ok, I know this is Slashdot and stupid comments abound, but there's a limit, really!

    Those who live in glass houses...

    Vacuum tubes are a perfect illustration of electronic amplification. Far simpler to grasp and observe in action than semiconductor devices. They have unique and subtle characteristics which can't be replicated by transistors. This is equivalent to slopping out pigs a hundred years ago and useless to "99% of students" ?

    Apparently you missed the part where the original poster wanted this taught to every teenager as core curriculum, alongside Abe Lincoln. It's interesting to someone interested in the subject, but utterly useless mind-filler to anyone else.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  122. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EXAMPLE: FIRE

  123. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

    And what, pray tell, would be "useful" to 99% of students? I'm trying to think of something that you'd consider useful, and I'm failing.

    Sheesh, I gave you one example: Art skills. But how about reading, writing, math, history, science (principles! F=MA, not things like this), geography, music, philosophy, literature, grammar... Hell, I'm not a fan of teaching computer skills, but that's more useful than teaching the workings of vacuum tubes.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  124. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Crizp · · Score: 1

    Boris fan much? :)

  125. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by iBod · · Score: 1

    errm, sorry - was that a rebuff of some kind?

    Completely went over my head if it was?

    I wasn't commenting on what the OP said, but what you said.

  126. Re:"French amateur radio operator" by generic · · Score: 1

    I can't see him being an amateur. That was amazing.

    --
    Microsoft aggravates my tourettes syndrome.
  127. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

    errm, sorry - was that a rebuff of some kind? Completely went over my head if it was?

    I did my best -- sorry, bro. Keep workin' on it.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  128. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by blincoln · · Score: 1

    It is also useful for understanding more about what is going on physically with electronic devices (since tubes work differently than transistors), and where the terms for modern (or at least more modern) electronics come from. E.g "thyristor" comes from "thryatron" + "transistor". Understanding how we got to where we are today is always a good thing, and so is understanding what's going on at a low level in the systems one builds.

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  129. Re:"French amateur radio operator" by steeleye_brad · · Score: 1

    At least the article didn't link to a blog which linked to a news aggregator that linked to another blog that linked to youtube. This trend of just reposting crap without ANYTHING going back to the source if fucking terrible. But hey, I guess bullshit like this is what's keeping all these web two point oh sites afloat.

    Video was absolutely amazing...I'm not sure if "amateur" is the right word for this guy! Thanks for posting the source!

  130. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Crizp · · Score: 1

    Inadequate they may be, but the emulation of relatively recent DSP amps isn't all that poor. I'm amazed by the modelling in the Roland MicroCube. I use it with a '64 SG Jr. and the emulated overdrive and the overtones produced sound bright, organic and when set at a high volume, really FAT and oomphy. It can almost keep up with a full Tama Rockstar kit volume-wise, if the drummer's not playing too hard. Excellent little backstage / practice / studio amp.

    Not that good of a reverb on it though. But that's why one has the Holy Grail :)

    But I don't know. I haven't used it with that many guitars, it might be the good ol' P-90 that works most of the magic. I do feel that a real TSL-60 with a 4x12 cab sounds better.

  131. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by nuttycom · · Score: 1

    Studying the industrial revolution is about studying the *effects* on society from it. They don't waste time teaching exactly what the first steam engine looked like, and then looking how it changed and was improved over time.

    Dang, though, wouldn't history class be a hell of a lot more interesting if they did? Why should social changes be the only things covered in history classes?

  132. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by socz · · Score: 0

    I agree. I asked a friend about manipulating magnetic fields for an idea i have. He directed me to a page that talks about securing terminals and their monitors/hardware from espionage. I was like WTF does that have to do with what i want.

    Well, i learned from that that you can steal a monitors output and slap it right on your own monitor using the radiation it puts out! That is also where i learned that OLD TV sets at home had lead in their glass to protect viewers from the constant radiation. Although it's debatable, the idea is that as long as you are in front of the tv, you'll be ok. But if you're working next to it, not so much!

    As a guitarist i also find value in knowing about tubes and their differences against solid state. I also agree that it's important to understand how we got to where we are at. Imagine in 500 years the music they consider pop is nothing like we have today. And when they want to play some "classical" music, they'll need to have the instruments and equipment necessary. If we just move on with the new and discard/forget the old that won't be possible! boo

    --
    My abilities are only limited by my imagination
  133. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

    I dunno, I didn't think that transistors were very hard to understand. I have some background in chemistry, which helped, but the valve analogy works fine for lay people. I could probably explain the actual working concepts to most of my friends, but I want to keep them.

    -b

    --
    No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  134. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Tell that to the people a generation ago that was doing it without any modern technology as it WAS modern tech at the time. They got by just fine.

    Things like this would be the stepping stones to get back on track because of their lack of reliance on todays 21st century tech.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  135. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    Tell that to the people a generation ago that was doing it without any modern technology as it WAS modern tech at the time. They got by just fine.

    Just it because it isn't modern high tech doesn't mean it doesn't have a significant technological infrastructure in it's own right behind it.
     
     

    Things like this would be the stepping stones to get back on track because of their lack of reliance on todays 21st century tech.

    In really bad science fiction novels, sure. In reality it takes a lot of effort to support even 18th century technology.
  136. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Scaba · · Score: 1

    Did you mean Angus? He usually plays an SG through a Marshall.

  137. In 19th Century Soviet Science lab- by aqk · · Score: 1

    Wait for it....


    ...


    Hee hee... it's gonna be good...!


    umm... uhh..


    In Soviet Science lab,

    Glass vacuum tubes blow YOU!

  138. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Crizp · · Score: 1

    Wata... in Boris... LP with Orange amps, at least at Roskilde'07

  139. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Scaba · · Score: 1

    Ah, no, don't know him, but he sounds like a sensible dude if he uses that set up.

  140. Re:"French amateur radio operator" by mwilliamson · · Score: 1

    He called "CQ DE" in the video, but seemingly intentionally left off his callsign in the video. Maybe he wants his privacy. In any event, I'd love to contact him and actually hear his QRP radio with the homemade tubes on the air.

  141. Re:We need this type of thing done in the classroo by Crizp · · Score: 1

    Her :)