Slashdot Mirror


Startup Offers Peltier-On-Chip

LowSNR writes "The South Carolina based startup Nextreme, Inc. is developing technology to put Peltier Coolers in chip packages, according to an Ars Technica report. The tiny coolers could be situated on top of local hotspots on the die and pump heat away through a package pin to the motherboard. Also, the Seebeck Effect allows the waste heat to be used to be harvested to generate/reclaim power."

70 comments

  1. Perpetum Mobile ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I use the excess heat from my P4 to produce the energy for my p4?

    1. Re:Perpetum Mobile ? by ultranova · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Can I use the excess heat from my P4 to produce the energy for my p4?

      In theory, yes; the chip is hotter than its environment, so you can put a heat engine between them and generate energy. The maximum theoretical efficiency of this process is given by Carnot cycle and depends on the heat difference between the processor and the environment and the temperature of the environment. With current processors you can't really exceed 60 degree Celsius, or 333 Kelvin, and the environment is typically at 20 degree Celsius, or 293 Kelvin, so the maximum theoretical efficiency is around 12%.

      Of course, if you could find more durable materials, you could just insulate the processor, let it heat up to a thousand degree Celsius or so, and get nearly 77 percent efficiency. The hotter you run the processor, the more efficient the system becomes; a hypothetical plasma-state processor at 10,000K would give a theoretical efficiency of 97%.

      It would also give a whole new meaning to "flamebait" ;).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    2. Re:Perpetum Mobile ? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      http://media.arstechnica.com/news.media/thermalflow.png
      The picture shows they're dumping the heat into the PCB
      What I'm not really clear about is how that helps the cooling situation.
      Sure, you're moving heat from the CPU/GPU die, but not to a heatsink...
      So what's the point?

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Perpetum Mobile ? by m85476585 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The PCB is often used as a heatsink for SMD chips. It wouldn't work too well for a CPU, unless we adopt a new form factor with a surface area of 5,490 cm^2, or roughly a 2.5' square (and it would need a lot of heatpipes to make up for the extra distance between the CPU and the edges of the heatsink).

    4. Re:Perpetum Mobile ? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "In theory, no;"

      fixed it for you.
      I don't care how hot you get the chip, you can not get to 100%.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Perpetum Mobile ? by misleb · · Score: 1

      In theory, yes; the chip is hotter than its environment, so you can put a heat engine between them and generate energy. The maximum theoretical efficiency of this process is given by Carnot cycle [wikipedia.org] and depends on the heat difference between the processor and the environment and the temperature of the environment. With current processors you can't really exceed 60 degree Celsius, or 333 Kelvin,


      That is for the circuitry itself. But you can maintain a much hotter zone away from the sensitive parts. In fact, isn't that exactly what a peltier cooler does?
      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    6. Re:Perpetum Mobile ? by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Hmm, generating electricity from temperature differences between the hot end of the heat pump and the environment will make the hot end hotter than it would be with the system designed to simply dissipate heat as quickly as possible. This will make the heat pump consume more energy in the first place. Given that the actual efficiency of recapturing the energy is likely to be far less than the carnot cycle maximum, I wonder if this will ever be worth the trouble.

    7. Re:Perpetum Mobile ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of making the chip hotter and hotter to the point of failure, why not just lower the temperature of the environment to get more efficiency?

      Put your PC in a weather proof box just outside your window during the winter and the environment can be cold enough to freeze water.

    8. Re:Perpetum Mobile ? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I was talking about a chip made from some hypothetical material which can withstand high temperatures and thus wouldn't need to be cooled. You would let it heat up as high as it goes and then let the heat run an electric generator to feed energy back into the batteries, thus reducing total drain. In fact, if the material can withstand high temperatures, it would make sense to put thermal insulation around it to get it as hot as possible, because this would increase the efficiency of the electricity generation.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  2. Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's cool.

    Har har.

  3. Recycling heat is interesting, but heat itself by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think the heat recycling aspect itself shows some promise, and the design being built into the chip, but we have to consider that the same kind of designers that use these are just as likely to push the chip beyond the capabilities in terms of the total heat reduction for the system.

    People who tend to overclock or use overclocked chips, will frequently push the envelope even further if they think they can get away with it.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Recycling heat is interesting, but heat itself by Naughty+Bob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Both the heat recycling and heat reduction aspects of this start-up's tech work fine and would be extremely useful and practical, were it not for one small problem: The technology requires the entire CPU/GPU's circuit layout to be designed with this technology in mind. I'm betting that more pressing issues will influence the direction of chip development.

      --
      "Be light, stinging, insolent and melancholy"
    2. Re:Recycling heat is interesting, but heat itself by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um, this isn't anything special. All a peltier is is a bloody heat pump. In this case they figured out how to selectively locate where the TEC is applied. Back in the day (mid to late 90's) they used to attach a refrigerator to the chip. I thought it was a rather novel idea until I discovered that people playing with medical equipment and/or lasers were using TECs to pump off excessive heat from their devices. I tipped off the folks over at Tom's Hardware and a few months later people playing with these things on their PCs. It was kind of neat how people were able to drop their CPU cores below 0 deg and overclock to mass effect. The problem was and still is that these buggers are lousy when it comes to efficiency. For only a 20deg C differential they nabbed as much power as the bloody CPU they're attached to. So for your 60 watt CPU you end up having to stuff a heatsink (or equivalent) on it sized for 120 watts. While these guys appear to have figured out how to shrink the discrete unit size their documentation suggest they're just as power hungry. The energy recovery when in passive mode doesn't even come close to compensating for their power consumption when actively cooling let alone reclaiming enough waste heat to compensate for the energy consumed by the processor (or whatever they're attached to) itself.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    3. Re:Recycling heat is interesting, but heat itself by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      I agree that it's just a heat pump.

      But it's integrated into the actual chip design, which does improve its basic operational efficiency.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  4. Well.. by elsJake · · Score: 1

    I imagine this would only solve the problem for the first millimeters , you'd still need a pretty big heat sink somewhere. Would this open up the door for really high frequencies or would it just optimize things a little ?

    1. Re:Well.. by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1

      That'd be a big heatsink indeed if you need to open the door to get to it...is it just in the next room, or are you keeping it outside the building altogether?

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    2. Re:Well.. by elsJake · · Score: 1

      So you've never heard of: heatpipes , water cooling , or punctuation ? Must be tough...

  5. Yawn by skintigh2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Call me when they put a miniature Sterling engine on a chip and use it to recharge the battery.

    1. Re:Yawn by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      This 90's video gallery website show you various MEMS device, including a steam engine (2nd video) http://www.memx.com/movie_gallery.htm

      They use electrical power to vaporize water and generate mechanical momentum for MEMS device. I am not sure if the water circuit is opened or closed. If closed, this would qualify as a Stirling engine.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  6. Re:P4 - p4 != IPv4 - IPv6 by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can I use the excess heat from my P4 to produce the energy for my p4?

    Only if you use IPv6 on the motherboard and IPv4 on the daughterboard.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  7. Do you have Peltier on a chip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    1. Re:Do you have Peltier on a chip? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> Peltier on a chip

      I was thinking that was one of them there fancy French hors d'orves.

    2. Re:Do you have Peltier on a chip? by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Also see here.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  8. old idea by scottrocket · · Score: 1

    Gee I had this idea about 20 years ago, & I suspect many readers here also had a similar sense of deja vu when they read this! Oh well, more power to them...

    1. Re:old idea by Freeside1 · · Score: 1

      "more power to them..." Hah!

    2. Re:old idea by geekoid · · Score: 1

      did you do it? did you figure out how to get it onto the chip?
      Having an idea doesn't count for squat.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:old idea by Namlak · · Score: 1

      Gee I had this idea about 20 years ago, & I suspect many readers here also had a similar sense of deja vu when they read this! Oh well, more power to them... Building an anti-gravity hovercraft is a good idea!

      OK, here's your chance again - GO!
    4. Re:old idea by scottrocket · · Score: 1
      Building an anti-gravity hovercraft is a good idea!

      Look out your window.

    5. Re:old idea by scottrocket · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Having an idea doesn't count for squat.

      No, having an idea is where it all begins. Not doing anything with that idea is what's worth squat. Guilty!

    6. Re:old idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I attended a conference in November of '06 (IMECE in Chicago) and sat in on a presentation by two Motorola researchers who seemed to have already developed something similar. Anyhow, the major problem with these materials is that they aren't very efficient because of the simple fact that electrons carry heat. These devices just aren't practical with current materials.

    7. Re:old idea by Nullav · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It counts for a lot, provided you have enough to file a patent.

      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
  9. Useful, but not new by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Informative

    Peltier devices on-chip have been used for a while, whenever temperature variations are intolerable. Some examples: Analog Devices AD595 thermocouple amp, which uses in-chip thermal calibration to ensure a cold junction of known temperature, and many voltage regulators and switching supply controllers that use temperature-controlled bandgaps as their voltage reference.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    1. Re:Useful, but not new by evanbd · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've only glanced at the data sheet, but unless I'm severely mistaken, that chip *compensates* for temperature rather than controlling it. Every other thermocouple CJC chip I've seen does the same basic thing. Temperature compensated voltage references follow the same basic patter of balancing a bandgap or zener with a Vbe drop and possibly some second order effects. The very best such chips (eg the Linear Technology LTZ1000; I'm sure there are other similar ones) use a heater. Temperature-controlled crystal oscillators also use a heater. This method ensures constant temperature, but it's far cheaper, simpler, and more effective to maintain the temperature *higher* than ambient.

      I've seen discussions of using on-chip peltiers for heat management before, but I don't think I've actually seen it done.

    2. Re:Useful, but not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the AD chip really use the Peltier effect? Ice point compensation can simply mean that a negative tempco device is used to take into account the ambient temperature and adjust the amplifier output (that is why the thermocouple type is important). Bandgap references use the same trick: the BE junction has a positive tempco so the collector output of a second transistor is used to compensate. Could you tell us where you saw a reference on the use of Peltier in that chip. I could not find any.

    3. Re:Useful, but not new by raidfibre · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cold-point compensation does not mean it actively heats or cools anything on the chip.
      Check the data sheet.
      http://www.analog.com/UploadedFiles/Data_Sheets/AD594_595.pdf

    4. Re:Useful, but not new by SalieriW · · Score: 1

      Anyone know what happened here? It was a pretty big announcement at the time but then *poof*, and nothing seems to have public come of it. http://www.google.com/patents?vid=USPAT6800933

    5. Re:Useful, but not new by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      It's possible I'm wrong, but that's what I've been told by coworkers who design bandgap references. I don't do chip design or know that much about it: I know they're heated, but coworkers indicated they were actively cooled as well, if necessary.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    6. Re:Useful, but not new by evanbd · · Score: 1

      I certainly wouldn't say it's not done... but I've never seen an example of it. For inexpensive devices, the temperature isn't controlled, but the coefficient is balanced against something with the opposite coefficient. For more expensive devices, the temperature is controlled and kept above ambient because that's easier and cheaper. I can't imagine any case where that wouldn't work, unless perhaps you needed to run in a very hot environment -- but then I would think you'd want to cool the entire enclosure, and then heat the part if needed for precision.

      It's a very interesting idea, and I'd love to see examples (and especially read why that route was chosen).

      It's also worth noting that I think this article is mostly talking about heat management, not temperature control -- trying to cool the parts of the chip that generate too much heat actively rather than by conduction. A very different, but equally interesting problem.

  10. Re:Well.. This, hot on the heels of ... by davidsyes · · Score: 1, Funny

    SuperSoaker.... Make a nukulerized mini-soaker/quantum heat sink and call it a physical feat. Snatch defeat from the jaws of victory... shunt the heat to another dimension...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  11. RTFA by Nicholas+Bishop · · Score: 1

    The article says it's in North Carolina, not SC. Much as I wish it were here...

  12. hmm. by apodyopsis · · Score: 1

    I confess this is not my area of expertise so I have my alabaster underpants in readiness for a good flaming.

    But does this mean they can cool the chip without the heat sink/fan combo, or will they still need some method a pumping the heat around the chip to the areas that can process it. I mean comparatively the chip is quite big and we are only looking at one top layer of it surely?

    I can hear my computer whirring as I type, anything that offers hope to get rid of that noisy thing gets my vote.

    1. Re:hmm. by BlackSabbath · · Score: 1

      > alabaster underpants

      I think you mean asbestos - possibly less conductive of heat and more conducive of comfort (relatively speaking).

    2. Re:hmm. by rcw-work · · Score: 1

      But does this mean they can cool the chip without the heat sink/fan combo

      Heat engines, thermocouples, etc. don't harness "hot". They harness the flow of heat. If you do not provide any place for that heat to move to, they can't do anything.

      Now, if you just want to get rid of that noisy fan, get a heat pipe and have it move the heat from your CPU to your chassis (if suitable) or to a radiator cooled by a much larger, slower, quieter fan.

    3. Re:hmm. by Ignis+Flatus · · Score: 1

      i think the problem is that most people seem to be focused on this as applied to CPUs and the cooling of CPUs. it simply doesn't seem practical for that because the heat generated by CPUs is generally very high. seems to me that the best applications would be small chips that serve other functions. say you've got a chip that gets just a little too hot for its environment, dump some heat out into the printed circuit board. it could save manufacturing costs versus gluing a small heat sink to the chip.

      but in a CPU that already requires external cooling, you might still have some circuitry on the chip that produces hot spots. or produces hot spots intermittently, generating heat cycling and mechanical stress in the chip. these peltier devices could alleviate that problem, improving reliability or performance. but for larger cooling problems or reclaiming waste heat, they just don't sound practical to me. efficiencies aren't that good.

  13. Someone tag this "perpetualmotion" by blueZ3 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    As cool as it is to use the peltier effect to cool chips, in no way is the "reclaimed heat" going to be enough to generate any significant amount of power.

    I don't mind companies spouting marketing drivel, because that's what companies with marketing departments do. But this whole "fake green" thing that's going on recently has got to stop.

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    1. Re:Someone tag this "perpetualmotion" by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Never heard of a Sterling Engine before, have you?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:Someone tag this "perpetualmotion" by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      Sorry, as long as the "Environmentally friendly" movement is underway, we'll need to endure the "fake green" thing. We can't have our cake and eat it too, apparently.

      It's actually an outgrowth of the "me too" syndrome. As long as being environmentally friendly is cool, pretending to be environmentally friendly will be cool too.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    3. Re:Someone tag this "perpetualmotion" by Arimus · · Score: 1

      If you don't have your cake before you eat it doesn't that mean you're guilty of eating someone else's cake?

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
    4. Re:Someone tag this "perpetualmotion" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought all they were trying to do was add an extra 10 minutes of battery time to my laptop. Which is all I really need as every time it start telling me that it's about out of power I think "I just need 10 more minutes..."

    5. Re:Someone tag this "perpetualmotion" by Pyrrus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Never heard of carnot efficiency before, have you?

      Any energy recovered from this small temperature differential would be miniscule compared to the initial cost of putting a stirling engine in a computer. It costs energy to run the peltier plate as a heat pump, if you want low power it'd be less difficult and cheaper to just build a bigger heat sink.

    6. Re:Someone tag this "perpetualmotion" by Khyber · · Score: 1

      The thermal difference is enough to power the LEDs on a PC tower with a sterling engine.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    7. Re:Someone tag this "perpetualmotion" by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      If you don't have your cake before you eat it doesn't that mean you're guilty of eating someone else's cake?
      ?????

      I can see that you're trying to be funny, but I can't tell if you're making a joke on topic or not.
      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    8. Re:Someone tag this "perpetualmotion" by Arimus · · Score: 1

      It was a comment on the comment about having your cake and eating it...

      It was also posted prior to the regulation morning cup of coffee.

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
  14. Not really by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Well, not really. Even an ideal heat pump could only push the energy from here to there. More realistic ones however produce some heat of their own.

    That's right. Your fridge doesn't just move energy from inside to the radiator outside, it actually dissipate a little extra heat of its own. If you left the fridge door open, it would actually heat the kitchen a little. An air conditioner, ditto, that electricity it uses has to go somewhere, which means heating the outside air. It's no different for a Peltier. They actually produce quite a bit of heat in the process.

    The only value of a heat pump is that it can pump it against the natural flow. It can move some heat from a cooler place (e.g., the inside of the fridge) to a warmer place (e.g., a warm kitchen while you're cooking.)

    The Peltiers used for overclocking are, basically, used as a fridge. They can get the chip cooler than the heatsink (which actually becomes hotter as a result), and, with a powerful enough one, even below ambient temperature. Which is good for overclocking. Downside, if you get below the ambient air temperature, you get condensation, and electronics tend to not like that much.

    Here they seem to want to use it just to move the heat somewhere else.

    E.g., you have a really high-clocked piece of circuitry generating a lot of heat (e.g. the ALU), next to a piece of circuitry which doesn't switch as often (e.g., the cache), you can help more heat flow from the former to the latter. Downside, the chip as a whole _will_ become hotter.

    E.g., at least according to the summary, they want to pump the heat to a pin to the motherboard, although, to be honest, I'm not sure exactly how much heat will a pin dissipate. If that was that great a way to get a lot of heat off the chip (remember, it must also remove the Peltier's own heat), we'd be doing that already instead of using big heatsinks. The pins aren't even going into the die anyway, but are wired to it via some more modest traces.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  15. Would those be... by AVIDJockey · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... Cool Ranch chips?

    1. Re:Would those be... by AVIDJockey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow... I just needed to reply to myself to say that I'm truly ashamed to have written that.

  16. "Peltier coolers in chip packages"? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Let's see, "cooler" is slang for prison, Leonard Peltier is being held at Leavenworth, so this company is offering little Leavenworth models in potato chip packages? Excellent.

    1. Re:"Peltier coolers in chip packages"? by andruk · · Score: 0

      From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Peltier: "Peltier is currently incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania."

      Good try though.

    2. Re:"Peltier coolers in chip packages"? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Gee, you think an encyclopedia anonymously edited by anyone who feels like it might get something wrong once in a while? It's possible that he was moved since 2005, but Leavenworth was where he was held then, according to the research I was able to do in the two minutes between deciding to make that silly joke and stupidly hitting "submit." It really wasn't that funny to begin with, but thanks for trying to ruin it anyway, Captain Bringdown ;)

  17. seebeck effect isn't very efficient by Myrcutio · · Score: 2, Informative

    I once thought of tossing one of these thermoelectric (TEC) coolers in my system to try and help with waste heat, but the trouble with the seebeck effect is that it reaches a cutoff point fairly quickly. You see, the "cool" side of the tec doesn't remain cool, it heats up as well meaning that the temperature difference grows gradually smaller and smaller, which in turn reduces output of voltage and becomes a vicious cycle, building up more and more heat on the hot side.

    TEC's are great when using the peltier effect since the electric side can be managed easily, so long as there is a way to pump away the waste heat. But the seebeck effect is not a solution to waste heat, not unless there is a breakthrough in efficiency i'm not aware of.

    1. Re:seebeck effect isn't very efficient by Falstius · · Score: 1

      The efficiency of the Seebeck effect is limited by the thermal isolation of the heat source and heat sink. In a macroscale system, this generally isn't very good. In a microsystem it can be extremely good. Vacuum packaging would help even more, but that is probably overkill here.

  18. Reversal? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

    Do peltiers still suffer from occasional reversals where the sides flip cooling/heating?

    1. Re:Reversal? by Radon360 · · Score: 1

      TMK, only if you reverse the electrical polarity to the junction. If you over drive the junction, you'll lose the effect and both sides will heat up.

  19. Peltier reliability by kylehase · · Score: 1

    I read somewhere many years ago that the problem with peltier coolers is that they are active devices and as such are susceptible to failure. When they do they basically become an insulator rather than a conductor of heat and you could fry your hardware. At least with heatsink + fans if the fan fails the heatsink will still perform some passive cooling and the chip will heat up gradually and your temp sensors would have a bit more time to react. In fact your fan monitors would sense the fan failure even before that.

    --
    You want fun, go home and buy a monkey!
    1. Re:Peltier reliability by Molochi · · Score: 1

      Actually It's worse than that. The net heat output of a peltier cooled chip is higher. So you need even more of whatever cooling you were going to use to begin with. So the fan can still fail as well.

      The popularized advantage of peltier cooled cpus was that, with very efficient cooling (say, water cooling and a well ventilated computer room), you could get the cpu below ambient temperature, sometimes below freezing temp. It was an "easy" way to get a "stable" 1GHz out of an old Slot A Athlon

      The concern about peltier failure prompted some people with too much time on their hands (like me) to mount a 120w pelt on top of the 65w cpu's waterblock (to cool the copper waterblock which would cool the cpu) and then mount a second waterblock just for the hot side of the peltier. the idea being, temperature monitoring would have the time needed to shut the system down if the peltier failed while the waterblock would act as the heatplate for the cpu (you need one anyways). The limitation of this araingement was room temperature (at best) water flowing between the peltier and the cpu.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  20. Re:Recycling heat? by Wowsers · · Score: 1

    Isn't recycling heat called "thermal runaway" and the last thing you want in a processor :-) ?

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.