Slashdot Mirror


NASA Wants Fast Moonbuggies and Solid Lunar Lander

coondoggie writes "NASA may have its eyes on the Sun and Mercury this week but it is clearly focusing on the moon for the future. NASA is soliciting proposals from the scientific and aerospace communities for design ideas for its next lunar lander. NASA officials said the Altair spacecraft will deliver four astronauts to the lunar surface late during the next decade. According to NASA Altair will be capable of landing four astronauts on the moon, providing life support and a base for weeklong initial surface exploration missions, and returning the crew to the Orion spacecraft that will bring them home to Earth. And while they won't be flying to the moon but rather flying around the U.S. Space & Rocket Center in Huntsville, Ala., the space agency has set April 4-5 as the dates for 'The 15th Annual Great Moonbuggy Race'. The race is for high school and college teams where they build and race their lightweight, two-person lunar vehicles. More than 40 student teams from 18 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Canada and India have already registered." My proposal just features a domo-kun mouth and giant pink ears attached to an El Camino. Money please!

9 of 117 comments (clear)

  1. Re:NASA Wants Fast Moonbuggies by C0rinthian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only if it's called The Crushinator.

  2. Sun, Mercury, Moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    NASA has eyes on Sun and Mercury? Why does NASA care about the MySQL purchase? I can see the interest in mercury though - breaking open a thermometer and trying to catch the mercury is fun. As for the moon... I take it this time there's going to be a mini series filmed on some secret Hollywood set. Don't forget to position the prop rocks properly this time -- remember, showing the prop number makes the conspiracy theorists theorize conspiracies. ;)

  3. Rims & Ground FX by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Funny

    Also a really good sound system for blasting the theme to "2001" at all hours of the night.

  4. No room for Bender, huh? by Big_Monkey_Bird · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fine then. I'm going build my own lunar lander. With blackjack, and hookers. In fact, forget the lunar lander and the blackjack. Ah, screw the whole thing.

  5. Apologies to the Simpsons. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can you name the Moonbuggie with four wheel drive,
    Smells like a steak, and seats thirty five?
    Lunorero! Lunorero!
    Well, it goes real slow with the hammer down
    It's the country-fried Moonbuggie endorsed by a clown
    Lunorero! Lunorero!
    Hey, hey!
    Twelve yards long, two lanes wide,
    Sixty five tons of American pride!
    Lunorero! Lunorero!
    Top of the line in Lunar works,
    Unexplained fires are for the managers of the dorks!
    Lunorero! Lunorero!
    She blinds everybody with her super high beams
    She's a rock-crusin', sand-spuin' drivin' machine
    Lunorero! Lunorero! Lunorero!
    Whoa, Lunorero! Whoa!

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  6. It's about time by Cathoderoytube · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally, it looks like NASA is investing serious resources into researching sweet jumps in low gravity.

    --
    I have nothing compelling to say
  7. Domo-kun mouth and giant pink ears by lbmouse · · Score: 2, Funny
  8. Fast buggies and low gravity by IBBoard · · Score: 2, Funny

    So NASA want fast buggies? On the moon? Where the gravity is low? And no-one pointed out the potential problem of astronauts flooring it, leaping over a big ridge and crashing it worse than the Mars lander?

    Oh well, at least the UK gets to share its space funding with the rest of Europe, so we don't spend only our money hot-rodding cars for low gravity :)

  9. Solid Lunar Lander by jmichaelg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gosh! I'm glad they finally got that spec'ed right. The fluid landers were just piss down the drain.