Slashdot Mirror


Do Any Companies Power Down at Night?

An anonymous reader writes "My Health Sciences Campus has about 8,000 desktop computers, and on any given night about half of them are left on. I know this because I track all the MAC addresses in case there is a virus outbreak. Aside from the current fad of 'being green', has anyone had any success in encouraging users to power-down at night? You could potentially eliminate running bots, protect yourself from the next virus outbreak, keep your data safe, etc. Do security concerns and power consumption issues matter enough to do this?"

15 of 646 comments (clear)

  1. Good idea! by cromar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would go with a reward plan. You could do something like give the top three most energy efficient people a gift certificate to the campus eatery (or whatever really). Calculate how much money is saved (out of everyone participating) and use part of that money to create a pool for the prizes. (It seems like for a large enough group of people, the energy and maintenance costs would reduce considerably, but I wouldn't really know ;) I know I would definitely turn off my work PC every night if I got a free lunch!

  2. Do you support wake-on-lan? by rmcd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm at a university and many of my colleagues leave their machines on overnight because they sometimes need access to their machine, either to retrieve a file or to run a program. If the IT folks provided everyone with a wake-on-lan script then everyone could turn off their machine. For years this has seemed to me like a no-brainer.

    Is there some security or other downside I'm not aware of? Is WOL not reliable?

    1. Re:Do you support wake-on-lan? by arth1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      WOL takes longer than the timeout period for many services (including, but not limited to WINS, and some windows networking components will take up to three quarters of an hour to recover if a service is initially reported as unavailable while the machine appears to be up).

      Another concern is whether your servers are up to handling all the PCs coming on at once in the morning. People leaving Outlook running at all times is actually a Good Thing for IT, cause the alternative of thousands of people hitting the Exchange servers at the same minute would kneel even the biggest distributed servers. Then there's similar concerns for the domain controllers, DHCP servers, proxy servers, or you have it. Leaving a substantial part of the machine park already logged in can save a lot of hardware and configuring.
      If shutting everything down, at least a staggered start-up could be prudent.

  3. Re:Hibernate by superflit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I did a project in My Campus with more than 8000 desktop computers.
    It saved something like 33% power consumption (measured, before and after).
    after midnight all desktops that are not in the excluded list hibernate automatically.
    I used python + MFC . Was very easy and simple.
    It is time for the Sysadmins start to program and make better use from the technology (not just, next-next-finish)..

    And I didn't receive any raise besides saving a lot of money to University.
    Shameless promotion: Looking for a new job in developed country.

  4. I have been told they turn off overnight in Japan by hax4bux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Among other projects, I worked on the power supply controls for the Cray Super Dragon. No, you probably never heard of it, but it became the Sun ES-10K.

    This box had variable voltage power supples which required me to adjust them from cold start. I had to calibrate A/D, take samples, tweak, etc all through JTAG and cumulatively it was quite slow. Like over an hour.

    My manager was not impressed, I shrugged and said "who turns these off?" - and the marketing droid/product manager said "they do in Japan". Fine. The hardware people were nice enough to give me multiple JTAG lines and power up time shrank to acceptable limits.

    I have never been certain if this was a "Spinal Tap" riff or it was really true.

  5. Re:Easy fix by UncleTogie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You have to weigh that against lost productivity from employees needing to remote into their workstation at night and print that document to submit for tomorrow's 8:00am deadline. They'll now be able to blame IT, when the boneheaded logon-hours policy makes them fail.

    You might be able to set up an "exception" ticket with the IT department, or set up a Magic Packet arrangement tied to their machine.

    --
    Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  6. Re:Common wisdom by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most failures of any electrical or electronic system occur during startup. That's when subsystems haven't fully stabilized and experience high inrush currents, with concomitant spike heating and other stresses. It's the same reason incandescent lights usually pop when switched on, but rarely fail when left lit.

    I never switch any of my systems off, and failures are extremely rare. I have all monitors and flat panels automatically power down, but I leave hard drives running continuously. About the only time I have to replace something is when I upgrade every few years. Yes, it adds a few dollars to my electric bill, but I save in other areas there, and it is worth the peace of mind.

    Even fans (which are the weak link in most PCs) can run for ages if you spend the money to buy quality parts. It helps to have a good HEPA filter in your computer room, and keep the machines off the floor. Fans last a long time without dust in the bearings, and a dust-free computer runs cooler as well.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  7. Waste not, want not.. by Ancil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I worked for a very large (top-3) pharmaceutical for years. They always asked employees to shut off their computers at night when they went home.

    Then one day, they sent out a campus-wide email telling people to leave their computers on all night and over the weekend. They used the CPU cycles to run high-performance scientific computing jobs, saving the cost of buying a supercomputer.

    Of course, not every company has a need for spare CPU cycles. This place did a lot of protein-shape searches etc..

  8. workstations by day, cluster by night by nategoose · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The CS department at the college I went to used to turn off all the PCs at night but now has them set up to start doing scientific calculations during the times when the labs are closed. They use power during this time, but it's not wasted.

  9. Re:We power down at weekends by Eivind · · Score: 4, Interesting

    14 hours a day times 52 times 5 times average power-consumption for an idling desktop times 10K employees works out to:

    14*52*5*0.15*10000 = 5.460.000 Kwh of electric power, WORSE in the time when you use AC, because you'll need additional AC to get rid of that extra heat.

    With average power-prices of 10 cent, you'll spend more than half a million dollar just paying for the electricity, in practice with AC and all you'll probably pay a million.

    So, you saved $80K and wasted a million. Way to go !

  10. Re:Easy fix by smoker2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You could also use that magic packet, to signal the computer to wake when the user swipes their access card first thing in the morning. By the time they reach their desk, their pc would be up and running. Ok, you have to link the access systems to a control server, but it wouldn't take too much hacking. They probably log accesses on a server anyway, so use that one.

  11. Re:Hibernate by superflit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Paid 50% in taxes, escaped from robbers.
    Twice threaten by fire guns.
    Being honest when everyone is "taking a good time"..
    Voted, volunteer work..Teaching..

    We can change places..

    I dream when I may take a dinner and walk some quarters by night without fear..

  12. Re:Increased probability of HDD failure by toddestan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Harddrives are mechanical devices, and are wearing out anytime they are powered up and running. While I'm sure that a drive does get stressed a bit more when it is turned on, I can guarantee you that a drive that runs for 40-50 hours a week is going to last longer than a drive that runs 168 hours a week.

    There are also other benefits. A harddrive that has motors or bearings that are starting to fail can be caught when they have trouble spinning up and be replaced before they totally fail, preventing data loss. Furthermore, if a head crash occurs when no one is around (during the night or the weekend), having the the heads banging and grinding against the platters for hours or days is really going to hamper any recovery efforts.

  13. Re:Uh, Sleep Mode - shutdown? by nicolastheadept · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is what happens at my College. After a certain time a box pops up saying it will shut down in five minutes unless you tell it no.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  14. Personal experience with 3300 PCs by thalassinos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work for a medium size European bank. Total workstations aprx. 22000 in 13 different countries.

    We used to leave all our PCs on all the time in order to run updates, patches etc.

    In my area of operations there are only about 3300 PCs. Nine months ago we implemented a policy where all users were required to turn off their PCs (not servers) at the end of day. Wake-on-LAN was used to turn the PCs on during the night for updates and 15 minutes before the start of the workday.

    Very conservatively, we estimate that we will save about EUR153000 (USD225000) every year (I live in a country with very high electricity rates).

    So, it is definitely worth it financially, our users were not adversely affected at all and it helped morale by making the workplace a greener place.