Slashdot Mirror


Big Delays, Small Laptops: OLPC XO Recipients Mad

PCWMike writes to tell us about the growing concern over the failure of OLPC to deliver laptops to some of its customers. PC World editor-in-chief Harry McCracken notes that record-keeping was poor for some of the people who paid via PayPal. A report on LinuxJournal also suggests that customer information was lost due to errors in the database software used by OLPC. Quoting PC World: "OLPC spokesperson Jackie Lustig acknowledges problems with the ordering and the fulfillment process, but says the biggest challenges are a short supply of XO laptops and the organization's ability to meet consumer demand for the XO laptop. Some also wonder whether chronic delivery problems for Give One, Get One donors may bode poorly for the 15 countries slated to receive nearly 500,000 XO notebooks. Lustig says delivering in bulk to just over a dozen countries is infinitely simpler than processing and delivering 80,000 individual laptops."

165 comments

  1. Money transferred but no accountability? by Malevolent+Tester · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're really getting the hang of foreign aid. I applaud OLPC for their quick adaption.

    --
    If you haven't made a developer cry, you've wasted a day.
    1. Re:Money transferred but no accountability? by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also, they've unashamedly fucking over their early adopters and strongest advocates. Have they been acquired by Apple?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:Money transferred but no accountability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I ordered a "give one, get one" on the first day and got it just a few weeks later.

    3. Re:Money transferred but no accountability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm just surprised the /. editors didn't get the name wrong:

      PC World editor-in-chief Phil McCracken notes that record-keeping was poor for some of the people who paid via PayPal.
    4. Re:Money transferred but no accountability? by Idefix97 · · Score: 1

      It was clearly stated that OLPC couldn't guarantee when the laptops would be shipped. They only promised to get the very first ones (like myself) shipped in time for xmas. I have to admit that even I had a problem with their address - they had dropped my actual unit number, so it took a few xtra days to get it (it arrived on Dec 21st).

    5. Re:Money transferred but no accountability? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      You make a good point. OLPC are far, far worse than Apple, because they excuse their fiduciary incompetence by babbling about the greater good.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  2. Why am I not surprised? by mi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Starry-eyed desire to save the world is a good drive, but fulfilling the orders and delivering on the promises requires a lot of mundane work. One needs to get "all corporationy" to provide consistently good service...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Why am I not surprised? by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Actually not true, in fact getting 'all corporationy' really means how far can you minimise service, support and the cost savings achieved do not exceed the number of customers lost, including the customary PR=B$ snow jobs, which attempt to convince the customer they are the only one with a problem and it was their fault anyhow and even so the corporation still cares about their problem and it will be completely resolved in two weeks, two more weeks, yet two more weeks, just two more weeks, honest just two more weeks, 'er', two weeks after a likely to be successful class action law suit is initiated.

      All OLPC needs to do is ensure they are able to focus upon delivery or subcontract those services out to a logistics company that can achieve those goals at a reasonable price. The logistics route is often simpler as those companies can readily handle break down packaging from bulk to individual orders as well as final delivery to the recipient and if required keep the recipient advised if there are any delivery delays.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Why am I not surprised? by mi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually not true, in fact getting 'all corporationy' really means how far can you minimise ...

      And the answer is not far at all... Just wait for these orders to finally arrive and people try to get support for them... Dell got a lot of flaming over outsourcing support to India — OLPC outsourced it to the even worse-trained rural teachers, etc. There'll be more horror-stories — watch this place.

      All OLPC needs to do is ... subcontract those services out to a logistics company

      Yes, I agree, that's one way to get "corporationy" — unless you can name a logistics co-op/commune, that is...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    3. Re:Why am I not surprised? by wall0159 · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      "Starry-eyed desire to save the world is a good drive, but fulfilling the orders and delivering on the promises requires a lot of mundane work."

      Post-modern cynicism sounds really sophisticated and cool, but actually saying something meaningful requires some knowledge of the specifics and not merely sweeping generalisations.

      And as another poster has noted, since when do corporations "provide consistently good service"??

    4. Re:Why am I not surprised? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that Mr. Negroponte is going to stop letting me wear my "Legalize it!" t-shirt to meetings? Oh, man...he used to be SO cool too.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:Why am I not surprised? by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, when is the last time you had a major reputable corporation just completely lose you order after you paid them? Not lose your shipment, not screw your order up, but COMPLETELY LOSE IT. This suggests a pretty basic level of incompetence.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:Why am I not surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newark electronics did it to be twice last year (On the same order no less).

    7. Re:Why am I not surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All OLPC needs to do is ensure they are able to focus upon delivery or subcontract those services out to a logistics company that can achieve those goals at a reasonable price.
      Part of the problem may have been the OLPC's desire to accomplish these goals at an unreasonable price: free. Rather than charging more for shipping, OLPC constrained themselves to use only logistics companies willing to work pro bono, arguing that they are passing the savings on to the children. I don't know the numbers involved, so I can't say if the cost savings was worth it. But with reported call wait times regularly in excess of 45 minutes, I get the impression that the logistics companies are using the work's pro bono nature as an excuse to provide substandard service. While I had no problems receiving my order, I feel bad for the people stuck in this customer relations nightmare -- both the customers and OLPC.

      But other than this delivery problem and the sticky key problem, OLPC is doing amazingly well. I don't think there's ever been a non-profit hardware manufacturer before, and in just a few short years these guys have delivered a product vastly superior to the market leaders' offerings.
    8. Re:Why am I not surprised? by wall0159 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, I haven't had a major coporation lose an order of mine. However, I'm a small sample set.

      I've just moved to the UK, and the incompetence of various companies has absolutely astounded me. I've just set up
      Banking
      Phone
      Internet
      Mobile Phones
      Insurance

      Not once - NOT A SINGLE TIME - has the company not cocked up something that has required me to phone them back (and queue on the phone) at least once. Several cases have require multiple such calls (the worst required me to ditch them and go with someone else). Seriously, corporations suck - in my experience they're much more hopeless than government organisations. I reckon that whoever says the opposite has an agenda.

    9. Re:Why am I not surprised? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Seriously, corporations suck - in my experience they're much more hopeless than government organisations. I reckon that whoever says the opposite has an agenda.
      If you don't like a company's service, you can always choose another. Can you have for yourself a government different from the one that the majority picked?
    10. Re:Why am I not surprised? by mi · · Score: 3, Informative

      Seriously, corporations suck - in my experience they're much more hopeless than government organisations.

      Where I'm from the government was providing all of the services, and some of the services you are listing — Internet, Mobile Phones — simply did not exist. To get a regular phone line, one had to wait in queue for years.

      I reckon that whoever says the opposite has an agenda.

      Yes, and whoever disagrees with me is a moron.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    11. Re:Why am I not surprised? by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      "Yes, and whoever disagrees with me is a moron."

      Point taken - I should not have made an ad hominem comment - I expressed myself poorly.

      What I was trying to say is that there are a lot of people trumpeting the virtues of the invisible hand of the market as solving all problems, and that government is inherently useless. I think some of those people have an agenda.

    12. Re:Why am I not surprised? by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      "If you don't like a company's service, you can always choose another."

      That's a good point, and it's true that one can't pick and choose governments, except by moving country.

      Having said that, it seems to me that many (medium to large) companies are in such a position of power that they show almost complete disregard for their customers (and that this is quite consistent across companies). Does this really provide choice either?

      In my mind, capitalism is just like democracy, except the strength of your vote is dictated by the depth of your pocket.

    13. Re:Why am I not surprised? by slack_prad · · Score: 1

      OLPC doesn't provide warranty or tech support for the machines. The agreement suggests that you look for free support on public forums.

      --
      Sent from my desktop computer
    14. Re:Why am I not surprised? by AlexBirch · · Score: 1

      And the answer is not far at all... Just wait for these orders to finally arrive and people try to get support for them... Dell got a lot of flaming over outsourcing support to India -- OLPC outsourced it to the even worse-trained rural teachers, etc. There'll be more horror-stories -- watch this place.
      Who's the target audience for Dell?
      People who are not computer savvy in general!
      Who's the target audience for the Buy One, Get One?
      Your average slashdotter!!!

      Okay, perhaps they may need better support than Dell.

    15. Re:Why am I not surprised? by gr8scot · · Score: 1

      That could never happen! Except this once, in the same e-mail that told be about this!

      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/25/1535226

      Don't you wish the Internet had Edit > Undo ?

      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
    16. Re:Why am I not surprised? by gr8scot · · Score: 1
      Hmm, judging by your surprise at "incompetence," and being a United States citizen m'self, I'm eager to know where you moved from, so I can move there!~

      I've just moved to the UK, and the incompetence of various companies has absolutely astounded me. I've just set up
      Banking
      Phone
      Internet
      Mobile Phones
      Insurance

      Not once - NOT A SINGLE TIME - has the company not cocked up something that has required me to phone them back (and queue on the phone) at least once. Several cases have require multiple such calls (the worst required me to ditch them and go with someone else). It "has absolutely astounded" you? That all looks pretty typical, to me, based on experience moving among a few of the western states. Maybe you'd better tell us about the worst, before we all conclude you're just trolling.

      (the worst required me to ditch them and go with someone else)...

      Seriously, corporations suck - in my experience they're much more hopeless than government organisations. I agree in general that corporations suck, and I'll expound at length on the inherent evil of collective ownership and the resulting collective [non-]accountability, but it's important to remember that the corporations that have Senators & Congresscritters in their pockets -- the largest, generally -- are the ones that get away with the worst, so it isn't a "free market" that's to blame, but the commoditization of anti-free market regulations. As to "much more hopeless," dollar for dollar, I think the difference is more that when government wastes our money, our option is to write our reps in DC, and most of us don't. That only means we've gotten used to it, and that the minute amount government does for us is easier to ignore when they foul up and it's not delivered.

      I reckon that whoever says the opposite has an agenda. I certainly have.
      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
    17. Re:Why am I not surprised? by microwiz · · Score: 1

      All OLPC needs to do is ... subcontract those services out to a logistics company

      Yes, I agree, that's one way to get "corporationy" — unless you can name a logistics co-op/commune, that is...

      I think OLPC *did* think that it subcontracted out for those services - Patriot for data and address handling, and Brightstar for packing and shipping logistics. (Given that both are on the board at OLPC, I suppose their participation was a foregone conclusion.) Unfortunately, it is starting to appear that it didn't choose well, especially on the part of Patriot and the kind of communications it set up between the two (almost none at all, it seems). and didn't supervise well once it had made its choices. OLPC seems unwilling to admit to this or even address it publicly.
    18. Re:Why am I not surprised? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      So basically they are saying if we ship you a non working machine, fuck you? It is not our problem. Take it to then newsgroups. Doesn't give you much help if you are some barely literate slob with a fried CPU.

      Sorry, that don't fly in most civilized countries. A product has to be fit for us and perform its function as advertised. There are also laws for timely deliveries. I thin 6 to 8 weeks is the standard.

      Time to call the credit card companies and have the charges reversed. You did use a credit card right?

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    19. Re:Why am I not surprised? by moonshinerat · · Score: 1

      I've just moved to the UK, and the incompetence of various companies has absolutely astounded me. I've just set up
      Banking
      Phone
      Internet
      Mobile Phones
      Insurance
      As a UK national and resident for thirty years I can confirm that this is not just a problem at setting up time. Given another twelve months and the list will be three times longer. At least OLPC will probably not have any direct debit problems (you've got all the fun to come;-) Welcome to the UK, keep everything with a direct debit guarantee on it.
    20. Re:Why am I not surprised? by slack_prad · · Score: 1

      It's not like a commercial computer that you buy at dell.com. They don't advertise to fit certain needs of the normal populace .. it's something you get in return for your display of goodwill. They do offer a 30 day refund though. I did know well before hand that the computer won't do me any good.

      --
      Sent from my desktop computer
    21. Re:Why am I not surprised? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      It is a product that you bought in good faith that it would be of usable condition. It is also expected to be delivered in a acceptable time frame.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    22. Re:Why am I not surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does anti-business whining by feckless little pricks who've never done a day's work in their lives always get modded up?

  3. It *is* simpler by BlackHawk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He is absolutely correct; a half-million units shipped to just 12 to 15 destinations *IS* simple by comparison. Just look at the complexities of UPS' operations in moving 80000 packages within the boundaries of the US, and that becomes apparent.

    --

    Believe nothing, not even if I say it, if it violates your sense of reason -- Buddha

    1. Re:It *is* simpler by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      He is absolutely correct; a half-million units shipped to just 12 to 15 destinations *IS* simple by comparison. Just look at the complexities of UPS' operations in moving 80000 packages within the boundaries of the US, and that becomes apparent. Yep. This is why any company that does significant amounts of shipping has an entire department and sometimes more than one department devoted to it. Some companies even have entire shipping divisions. Moving a large number of packages quickly is a significant undertaking and that's why there's an entire industry called the logistics industry devoted to it. A friend of mine works in the logistics industry and her job is to coordinate the shipping of packages and crates to various places around the world. It's a big job.
    2. Re:It *is* simpler by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He is absolutely correct; a half-million units shipped to just 12 to 15 destinations *IS* simple by comparison. Just look at the complexities of UPS' operations in moving 80000 packages within the boundaries of the US, and that becomes apparent.

      Sure, but they're not hand delivering the things themselves. All they needed was some decent software to keep track of orders, print labels, slap the labels on boxes, and ship the boxes via UPS. This, it seems, is what they FUBAR'ed.

    3. Re:It *is* simpler by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Shipping one unit to one location is simple.

      Shipping 100 units to 100 locations is simple.

      Shipping 80,000 units to 80,000 locations is also simple, though the volume is orders of magnitude higher.

      The problem is that they did not appropriately plan and acquire/devote resources to distribution. Maybe they didn't think about the extra cost associated with tracking and distributing those orders.

      There is no reason why distribution of pre-orders should present any kind of challenge to a company. This is not on-demand shipping, or just-in-time delivery. This is simply basic distribution scaled up.

      Maybe I'm a bit harsh, but there is simply no excuse for someone to promise deliverables without a plan to deliver them. Did they not expect so many orders?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:It *is* simpler by CastrTroy · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, go with UPS. The $100 laptop which now costs $200, is actually going to cost $300 once you account for shipping costs.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:It *is* simpler by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Yeah but all that kind of stuff is booooooring.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:It *is* simpler by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      Yeah, go with UPS. The $100 laptop which now costs $200, is actually going to cost $300 once you account for shipping costs.

      Cheaper than FedEx. OK, so ship it priority mail. The actual carrier doesn't matter, the point is they are using one, and they're not hand-delivering the things with their own trucks.

    7. Re:It *is* simpler by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Shipping out five or ten is simple. 80,000 is hard.
      You have to hire and train the people to do it. They have to get paid, taxes collected, schelde, deliveries must be timed shipping bills must be paid, boxes bought. Then you must make sure that the people do the work correctly and that they don't steal the notebooks.
      It really isn't as simple as you think it is. Let's face it these people are note stupid but they are having problems with this. It only seems simple from the view point of arrogance and ignorance. Just shipping out 10,000 CDs for a software update is a big job.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:It *is* simpler by SkyDude · · Score: 2, Informative

      He is absolutely correct; a half-million units shipped to just 12 to 15 destinations *IS* simple by comparison. Just look at the complexities of UPS' operations in moving 80000 packages within the boundaries of the US, and that becomes apparent.

      Tue, but UPS manages to do it effectively. So does Fedex.

      By the way, UPS moves approximately 10,000,000 parcels per day, not 80,000. Fedex does around 7,000,000 per day. What's needed is professional logistics management, and that may end up costing more than this product will support.

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    9. Re:It *is* simpler by maxume · · Score: 1

      Say as a shipper you make mistakes about 1% of the time. Shipping 1 package, you will probably get it right. Shipping 100 packages, you will make 1 or 2 mistakes. Ship 80,000 packages and you are going to make 800 or 1000 mistakes. If you have to deal with mistakes on an individual basis and can't deal with a bunch of them the same way you scaled up your distribution, you end up with quite a problem...

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    10. Re:It *is* simpler by Lugae · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You, sir, are correct. Consumer fulfillment can be done very effectively, but it takes a lot of setup time to fool-proof things. Since they're only doing one run of this consumer fulfillment business, they probably didn't do all of the setup necessary. I would think that their ability to deliver these to their target audience abroad will be much simpler by comparison, which is where the production issue comes up.

    11. Re:It *is* simpler by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      He is absolutely correct; a half-million units shipped to just 12 to 15 destinations *IS* simple by comparison. Just look at the complexities of UPS' operations in moving 80000 packages within the boundaries of the US, and that becomes apparent.

      Tue, but UPS manages to do it effectively. So does Fedex.

      But shipping things to people is what these guys do.
      Getting me a laptop is not what OLPC does, this is just a one-off stunt, and the demand has overwhelmed them.

      I'm not bothered by this much. So I have to wait a few weeks for my toy... so long as they keep doing what they do (large-scale high-tech charity), and doing it well, I will not fault them for sucking at what they don't normally do.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    12. Re:It *is* simpler by SkyDude · · Score: 1

      But shipping things to people is what these guys do.

      In fact, they are just carriers. Their customers are shippers. There is a difference and that's where OLPC has hit a speed bump.

      Getting me a laptop is not what OLPC does, this is just a one-off stunt, and the demand has overwhelmed them.

      Certainly seems so. In my former life, I was a logistics manager (then we called it warehouse manager) and this is a familiar scenario to me. Marketing people come up with a hot idea and, for some reason, assume things just magically arrive at the customer's doorstep. Leaving the operations and logistics people out of the loop was SOP for many businesses large and small. But, with internet ordering, some have changed their ways.

      I'm not bothered by this much. So I have to wait a few weeks for my toy... so long as they keep doing what they do (large-scale high-tech charity), and doing it well, I will not fault them for sucking at what they don't normally do.

      Well sir, you are the exception. In my experience, products that didn't ship in a timely fashion usually resulted in hundreds of angry phone calls, and later, truckloads of angry e-mails. All of which could have been avoided if there had just been more detailed logistics planning.

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    13. Re:It *is* simpler by gr8scot · · Score: 1

      Marketing people come up with a hot idea and, for some reason, assume things just magically arrive at the customer's doorstep. It was your job to justify that assumption +/-72 hours. Were you up to it? ;-)

      I'm not bothered by this much. So I have to wait a few weeks for my toy... so long as they keep doing what they do (large-scale high-tech charity), and doing it well, I will not fault them for sucking at what they don't normally do. Well sir, you are the exception. I disagree with you, and agree with the GP. The recipients of the "buy one" computers intended to be charitable and waiting a few days, or weeks, or months is a social problem, maybe, but certainly not a logistical one. Logistically, they merely tell the caterer to re-schedule.

      As long as the "get one free" recipients get their thousands of computers in a shipping container on time, the individual shipments to First World addresses are not going to be a big problem.
      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
    14. Re:It *is* simpler by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      That's why most sane manufacturers don't do direct retail unless they want to make it a core competency.

      Most major manufacturers just ship a million units to a distributor, who adds a markup and then handles the mess of putting items in stores/homes/etc.

      I'm not quite sure why the OLPC initiative doesn't just retail its laptops via a distributor. It would be less fuss for them, and more revenue which means lower laptop prices which means more laptops in the hands of kids. All they need to do is sell 10k laptops to a distributor (for a little more than what they sell to 3rd world nations) and then focus on giving laptops to kids. Then when the distributor runs out they can place another order. Basically they just treat the distributor as "just another country" to give laptops to, except they can charge a higher price if they feel the moral obligation to do so. They'll sell more laptops this way, with less distraction, and more money going to their core mission...

    15. Re:It *is* simpler by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I'm not bothered by this much. So I have to wait a few weeks for my toy... so long as they keep doing what they do (large-scale high-tech charity), and doing it well, I will not fault them for sucking at what they don't normally do.

      Well sir, you are the exception. In my experience, products that didn't ship in a timely fashion usually resulted in hundreds of angry phone calls, and later, truckloads of angry e-mails. All of which could have been avoided if there had just been more detailed logistics planning.

      Well, it's a charity, and I waited 'till the last minute to finally give in, so I'm not reacting like I would if I was dealing with a business.
      Aside from that, well, thank you, I am exceptional! :-)
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  4. Please reconcile by mccalli · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the summary:

    "OLPC spokesperson Jackie Lustig acknowledges problems with the ordering and the fulfillment process, but says the biggest challenges are a short supply of XO laptops and the organization's ability to meet consumer demand for the XO laptop....Lustig says delivering in bulk to just over a dozen countries is infinitely simpler than processing and delivering 80,000 individual laptops."

    But how can that be, if the problem is short supply of the laptop?

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. Re:Please reconcile by Captain+Chaos · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The large shipments to developing nations take priority over G1G1 donor shipments. This was made clear while the program was running, but it appears some people must not have paid attention to that. I donated and I am still waiting on mine, but I'm not hopping mad like some people seem to be. I knew getting me my laptop wasn't the top priority, as was made clear on the site. I am anxious to get my hands on one, but I just got an update Wednesday, so it may not be too much longer since I am in the shipping queue for the next shipment.

    2. Re:Please reconcile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever considered that there might be more than one problem at the same time? This is not an MMORPG where you get quest after quest, you know.

    3. Re:Please reconcile by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      I, too, am waiting for mine. I am almost at the point where I am going to dispute the charge and report the organization as a scam.

      "Delivered by the holidays". Nope. "Delivered by Jan 15." Nope. Went to the website. "You can track your order...". Nope. All I get for a "tracking" result is a statement that almost all of the US units have been shipped, and that I can track my order at ... an invalid link.

      I called them on the 18th. "Your address is invalid". Well, that address is valid enough that I get my credit card statements there, and paypal validated it to make the charge. It's an address at one of the two largest employers in the city, large enough we have our own zipcode. The post office certainly knows where we are. "That address is invalid" after I correct the fact that they simply dropped the street address part of the address when they entered the order. "That address is invalid", even after I read them verbatim the address off the last credit card statement. The "support" person finally "set a flag" to ship to that address, even though he knew it was invalid. Right. He knows my address better than I do.

      So, I asked, when were you intending on letting me know my address was invalid? "You are on the list of people we are going to call" he said. Since they don't have my phone number, I'm not sure how they thought they'd call me.

      Several days later, I get an email notice: "your address is invalid". I call again. This time they don't even pretend that they can tell what is valid or not, they just write down the address and say "7 to ten business days". It was 7 to ten days a week ago, now it's seven to ten days again.

      That email also says I can cancel my gift and get "$199 plus shipping" back. Companies that charge me before they ship and then cannot fulfill the order within the legal timeframe don't get to keep half my money, sorry.

      Had they told me "we're low on supply", that would be a different story. That's not what they say. Feb. 7 is ten business days. Let's see what they say on the 8th when it hasn't arrived yet.

  5. Patience and Hope by jbrohan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This OLPC is going to change the world. I've got mine now and it is wonderful exactly what is needed IMHO. They are trying to do something that is very very hard and they need all the encouragement and kind words that are to be found. I hope they solve their delivery problems smoothly soon. No lack of talent in this group of people.

    1. Re:Patience and Hope by legoman666 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Change the world? Hardly. It's just a laptop; it doesn't cure cancer, it doesn't feed hungry mouths, it doesn't provide shelter, it doesn't provide electricity, it doesn't cure AIDS, and it doesn't solve a whole other myriad of problems. It is a laptop. One would think that people in thrid world countries recieveing the OLPC would have more pressing matters than giving everyone a laptop, but I guess not. There are a million better things to spend money on.

    2. Re:Patience and Hope by Twisted+Willie · · Score: 1

      The OLPC can (will?) vastly improve the eduction of third world children. It's better to teach a man how to fish than to just give him a fish. The OLPC is just taking this to a new level.

    3. Re:Patience and Hope by legoman666 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      great, so they'll be hungry, sick, and cold. But god dammit, at least they'll be educated. Simply handing them 100,000 laptops is not education. There is more to it than that.

    4. Re:Patience and Hope by poetmatt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bringing a drastic improvement in education to poor countries in a very economical fashion is indeed a world changing thing. Doing it without locking someone into a corporation's interest just makes it that much more important to the rest of us who hate Microsoft/IBM.
      There are better things to spend on, but long-term improving education is one of the best things to spend on for any nation including our own.

    5. Re:Patience and Hope by nuzak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > It's better to teach a man how to fish than to just give him a fish.

      And better yet to let a man fish. Or a woman, as the case may be (kind of insane to not allow the majority of your farm workforce to own property).

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    6. Re:Patience and Hope by stormguard2099 · · Score: 1

      Change the world? Hardly. It's just a laptop; it doesn't cure cancer, it doesn't feed hungry mouths, it doesn't provide shelter, it doesn't provide electricity, it doesn't cure AIDS, and it doesn't solve a whole other myriad of problems. It is a laptop. Change the world? quite possibly. It's just an education. It can help cure cancer, it can help feed hungry mouths, it can help provide shelter, it can help provide electricity, it can help cure AIDS, and it can help solve a whole other myriad of problems. It is an education.
      "This is not a laptop project; it's an education project," - Negroponte
      --
      http://greenobyl.com/ please.... think of the children!!
    7. Re:Patience and Hope by kryliss · · Score: 1

      It's a start. Apparently with all the agencies just giving food, clothing, medicine etc, that isn't enough. I think it's a pretty good idea. A computer itself isn't going to do it but educate them on how to use it and somehow getting them access to the internet so they can find information will be the start. Of course many of these computers may end up being traded/stolen etc, there will be some good out of this. They will have access to information that they would not normally have. Who knows.....

      --
      --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
    8. Re:Patience and Hope by legoman666 · · Score: 1, Funny
      So if I hand random hungry person #341652 an OLPC, he will suddenly have his hunger satisfied?

      Of course, silly me, he looked up fishing on wikipedia!

    9. Re:Patience and Hope by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Say what? Let me look at what that's saying: there's sufficient food around, but people can't get it. If that were the case, then increasing crop yields via genetic manipulation is a solution to the wrong problem. In turn, that would mean that Monsanto et al are a bunch of money grubbing bastards.

      I must be a luddite or a communist.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:Patience and Hope by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Not every third-world child is starving and sick. My wife grew up in the Caribbean, and while the school was open air and high-tech was chalk and a 20-year-old textbook, she received a very decent education. An OLPC, while not exactly the most pressing need, would have certainly given them exposure to computers that they do not get, even now (we visited recently - still no computers, but they at least removed the patch of bamboo that they formerly lashed the kids with).

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    11. Re:Patience and Hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is starting to get annoying. They're not selling them to countries that are having trouble feeding people; they're selling them to countries that are at the point where the next step is education.

      It's insulting to imply that just because they weren't lucky enough to grow up in the first world that they don't deserve knowledge and the opportunity to learn, and should instead be relegated to some second class world citizenry that can never go beyond worrying about the basics of life. The countries that are ordering from OLPC have the basics down, they're ready for the next step.

      Far too many first world people are so focused on trying to be "helpful" with concerns like yours, when all they're really doing is making things worse. In effect, you're reserving the best things in life for yourselves and your first world companions -- God forbid those in poorer conditions than you ever get the luxuries you spend your entire life in. Be careful -- the same paternalistic justifications you use to claim they're not ready for laptops were the same that were used to justify slavery and communism: that some classes of people just aren't "ready" or "able" to handle things beyond basic needs. That's disgusting and it's disturbing on so many levels that people in the first world, who are supposed to be so educated and smart, can think like this.

    12. Re:Patience and Hope by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      So if I hand random hungry person #341652 an OLPC, he will suddenly have his hunger satisfied? No, he won't. But in 20 years, his children will be have the kind of education that will allow them to either produce enough of their own food or otherwise contribute to the economy in exchange for food. I know it's rare these days, but some people are still looking farther ahead than tomorrow.
    13. Re:Patience and Hope by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Not at first. But ultimately, his new laptop will open him up to the wonderful new world of online scamming.

      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day. Teach him a good grift, and he'll eat for weeks on his mark's dime.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    14. Re:Patience and Hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It is written:

      Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.

      Give a man a computer and he will post silly fish analogies on Slashdot.
    15. Re:Patience and Hope by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I like "Give a man a Twinkie and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to steal Twinkies and he'll eat for life."

      It's sort of appropriate too since they are shipping them to Nigeria, the place that invented 419 scam.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    16. Re:Patience and Hope by jank1887 · · Score: 1

      or, if the equivalent amount of money went into real infrastructure investment, he'd be eating now, and maybe generating increased income at the same time. Then, in 20 years, his children might already have an actual education...

    17. Re:Patience and Hope by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      I do believe that the OLPC and the Internet is a step towards that. Figure that article alone would have to have an impact on these people, right?

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    18. Re:Patience and Hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. We got our two G1G1 (Give one, get one) laptops a week or so ago, and I think they're fantastic. The GUI is puzzling for the likes of me, but kids get it straight away, and when I switch my IT brain off and play like a kid, I get it too. The XO laptop is not like anything else I've ever seen, and in the hands of millions of kids across the world, I think it really could change the face of education in the developing world.

    19. Re:Patience and Hope by Mariner28 · · Score: 1
      I think Terry Pratchett once said:

      "Give a man a match and he'll be warm for a minute. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm the rest of his life."

      --
      "A little misunderstanding? Galileo and the Pope had a little misunderstanding."
    20. Re:Patience and Hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lack of talent? Perhaps

      Lack of business sense? Definitely - look at how complex their ordering process is.

      If you're really trying to build a process in 2 weeks, as some at OLPC have said,
      use ONE logistics partner, not TWO. Amazon, for example, has a website that accepts
      payments, runs warehouses, and ships things effectively, in a traceable way. And you
      don't have to worry about handoffs between paypal->OLPC->Patriot->brightstar->fedex.
      The guy a patriot is complaining he's having to take too many calls, when amazon
      rarely takes calls because their web site is so good.

      They've known individual shipments would be a problem for over a year, but apparently
      decided to do this at the last minute. Guys, if you do that, set up a test order for
      1,000 units - then your 10% error rate will be obvious!

    21. Re:Patience and Hope by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      A lack of education may explain an individual's poor performance in a society, but I think you may find that it doesn't explain a society's systemic failures very well. And it can be counter-productive. Our value system often tells us that education is the measure of all value and the basis of all success, but it isn't really true.

      Peru's Sendero Luminoso, a guerrilla movement which triggered a protracted and bloody civil war, was the product of an educational project. During the 50's and into the 70's, it was believed that education was the key to moving Peru to development. A lot of universities were created, and a lot of people who couldn't afford them were given the opportunity to go. However, when they graduated, they found themselves without opportunities: they were in the same society and economy as before.

      Infrastructure, capital, and institutions are what enable people to "fish." If you "teach a man to fish" but he has no way of getting a fishing rod, the local streams and ponds are polluted, the fish are almost all dead, and its hundreds of miles away from the local fisheries, what you've done is wasted his time. Education needs to be structured to enable the individual to take a role in society that is at least feasible for that person to achieve, a role that is supported by local institutions.

  6. They said it themself by emj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They don't want to do distribution, shipping tens of thousands of things all around a continent isn't that easy.. Just getting payments information from paypal can be a hard thing to do.

    Saying this will happen to governments orders as well is very strange, and uncalled for.

    1. Re:They said it themself by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      They don't want to do distribution, shipping tens of thousands of things all around a continent isn't that easy.. Just getting payments information from paypal can be a hard thing to do.

      Horseshit. If you've put the systems in place and have an infrastructure even half thought out - it's pretty simple.
       
       

      Saying this will happen to governments orders as well is very strange, and uncalled for.

      Why? The existing evidence implies that they haven't put much thought into their logistics pipeline.
  7. I hate being so untrusting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but PC World, questioning OLPC's ability to deliver? And goodness me, look here: Intel and Microsoft with their alternative. No doubt Classmate sales-pitches will involve a lot of paraphrasing from articles of this type.

    It seems that a lot of recent OLPC stories are being drummed up to try and discredit them, and it is a bit sickening.

    1. Re:I hate being so untrusting... by microwiz · · Score: 1

      It seems that a lot of recent OLPC stories are being drummed up to try and discredit them, and it is a bit sickening.
      Sadly, OLPC's "drummed up" the base of these stories all on its own. Other companies may try to apply spin to them, but in the end, OLPC itself is the source of the issues. Why in the world did they choose to annoy and frustrate the very people who believed in them enough to donate $400? It's a real mystery.
  8. That's a real name? by EB+FE · · Score: 2

    McCrackin!? Hahaha... OK, so I'm immature.

    --
    Vital papers will demonstrate their vitality by moving to where you can't find them.
  9. Database Software Problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    But but but....The database sotfware is open source...It couldn't have screwed up since there are so many eyeballs looking at the code.

    1. Re:Database Software Problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but it's not. I cant find their specific DB software for download. Please point me to the link.

      and if you think the DB server is the software, you must be a high level Microsoft Programmer.

    2. Re:Database Software Problem? by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

      I know you're just being snarky, but really, the database itself is probably not the problem. Apart from the fact that they can't seem to decide if it's an order management screw-up or short supply (or both), any "database" error was more likely in the application used to track the orders. Even if that's an OSS application, the number of eyeballs will probably be much lower than your average OSS database.

  10. No, I still don't have my XO... by gorim · · Score: 3, Informative

    And I can't even track my order in their online tracking database. First email went unanswered and second one got a response, but was missing any indication of when they would ship, just that they were overwhelmed with the response.

    1. Re:No, I still don't have my XO... by pscottdv · · Score: 1

      I ordered five of them and have been putting off calling about not getting them because I understand that they are not a business.

      At least when I track my order at www.laptopgiving.org I have moved up from the "invalid reference number" to a message that tells me that I can track my order at www.laptopgiving.org!

      --

      this signature has been removed due to a DMCA takedown notice

    2. Re:No, I still don't have my XO... by aviators99 · · Score: 1

      It's worse for me. I ordered mine on day 1, got a letter promising it to me by December 24. On December 21, I received an apology letter explaining that they were overwhelmed and I would not get mine by 24th after all--but I would receive it by January 15. It has still not shipped. 3 days ago, on January 22, I received another e-mail saying I would receive it *by January 15*! I don't expect to ever see it, and I'm perplexed on how much I should actually write off on my tax return ($200 or $400???). They also informed me that if I want a refund, I can only get $200 of the $400 back.

      Look, I don't have a problem with fulfillment issues, and I want to support the cause, but the lack of tracking, communication, ridiculous e-mail, etc. is unacceptable. I've also paid a total of $30 in T-Mobile HotSpot day passes when I was supposed to have gotten a year for free as part of the package.

  11. Focus on what they do best? by mspohr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It looks like this eager and well intentioned group of people is trying to do it all but perhaps is best at developing the software and hardware. Perhaps they should focus on that and leave sales and distribution to people who are experts with these much different skills.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    1. Re:Focus on what they do best? by adriccom · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oddly, that is who OLPC partnered with to do G1G1, and who share the blame for the screwups.

      Please see the draft flowchart, if you like:
      http://wiki.laptop.org/go/How_laptop_delivery_works

      --
      <script>alert("I never liked JavaScript, really; it just seemed a bad idea.");</script>
  12. ...And I ordered on last day...and was charged by gorim · · Score: 1

    I ordered on the last day and paypal definitely took my money and gave it to OLPC. Those folx are doing something good but they are definitely disorganized.

  13. Seems a bit mean-spirited... by Obstin8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This article, and others like it that I've read, seem a little bit mean-spirited. OLPC is, after all, a charity organization - a noble one at that -, and not some high-volume order fulfillment logistics operation. All these articles suggest a crass, inflated-expectation, instant-gratification, "I WANT IT NOW!", type of consumerism to me.

    I'm in Canada, and waited 7 weeks for my XO to arrive. No biggie. I've waited almost as long for Dell to ship correctly configured servers on occasion. Those were biggies. Were my expectations appropriate for each company? I think so.

    I'm sure that OLPC will honor all their commitments and get these orders out as soon as they can. Sometime s**t happens, and things falls through the cracks. People should just take a deep breath, and ask themselves if they'd rather have their XO right now, or have the one they donated delivered first.

    G1G1 doesn't stand for "Get one, give one".

    1. Re:Seems a bit mean-spirited... by apathy+maybe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. OLPC project is not a fucking business.

      Their core job is not to make and sell laptops to individuals. What would be great here (and if the free market really actually worked...), would be for a dedicated company to step in and sell the things directly to people in over-developed countries. That way the project can get on with developing and distributing to governments, and someone else can distribute to individuals.

      Of course, they might cost slightly more because of the profit motive, but heck, most of them are seemingly being bought by geeks who already have 3 computers and can afford an extra $50 or so.

      --
      I wank in the shower.
    2. Re:Seems a bit mean-spirited... by DMoylan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but why even use a company when there are organisations like the red cross who are global could handle the shipping to major cities for collection and make a nice profit from the sale of each unit. just a random thought.

      on a personal note, living in ireland meant that i couldn't order one of these unforunately. so i went for an asus eee. the demand for those this side of the pond was incredible. ordered december 4 arrived jan 22. i had to get mine from the uk as our company hardware supplier gave up after ordering 200 and only receiving 16. demand for cheap micro portables was insane.

    3. Re:Seems a bit mean-spirited... by funkify · · Score: 1
      Sometime s**t happens

      This is Slashdot. It's OK, you can say "shit" here. It's really OK, I promise.

    4. Re:Seems a bit mean-spirited... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Noble intentions do not excuse incompetence. Poor kids would be better served by someone with not-so-noble intentions that could actually deliver. An incompetent paladin is not the best man to have in your party, no matter how good his farts smell.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:Seems a bit mean-spirited... by jnowlan · · Score: 1
      Agreed.

      Our family got ours here in Canada last week. Still trying to find time to explore it, but as has been noted elsewhere it was our little daughter who figured out how to open it!

    6. Re:Seems a bit mean-spirited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been laughing at this "charity organization" from its beginning, and this is yet more reason to laugh. How is laughing mean-spirited?

    7. Re:Seems a bit mean-spirited... by westlake · · Score: 1
      This article, and others like it that I've read, seem a little bit mean-spirited. OLPC is, after all, a charity organization.

      We provide sheltered work programs and services for the disabled.

      But we are in the business of bulk mailing, corporate promotions, fulfillment - and that is how we are judged by our customers. That is how we survive.

    8. Re:Seems a bit mean-spirited... by wrecked · · Score: 1

      As a fellow Canuck XO-donor, thank you for your breath of fresh air. We received our XO for our kid, last week as well. She, a grade-schooler, did not expect the XO until Feb/Mar (the original Canadian shipping estimate), and has shown more patience than all of the complainers on the forums. You're absolutely right; the complainers seem to share a loathsome consumerist mindset and seem to have forgotten caveat emptor.

      OLPC initially insisted that they did not want to go into retail ("we're an education project, not a laptop company"), precisely because of these logistical challenges, until they caved into the demand of us geeks; then they warned us that it may take months for the orders to be fulfilled. And, oh yeah, the XO runs Linux, not Windows. It's amazing that some people just do not seem to pay attention.

    9. Re:Seems a bit mean-spirited... by ywl · · Score: 1


      You are lucky.

      I'm a first day donor in the US and I still haven't got anything, other an email that complained about my mailing address. I'm giving a lot of slack to the OLPC but it's not really a very nice way to treat your biggest supporters.

    10. Re:Seems a bit mean-spirited... by Medievalist · · Score: 1
      elrous0 wrote:

      Noble intentions do not excuse incompetence. Poor kids would be better served by someone with not-so-noble intentions that could actually deliver. An incompetent paladin is not the best man to have in your party, no matter how good his farts smell. Thanks for providing a good example of the "mean spiritedness" that the previous poster referred to.

      I (and all but one of my friends) got our OLPC laptops before Xmas without any delay or problems. My children (8 & 11) have been hacking at them ever since Xmas morning. My sample indicates that the OLPC project does a decent job of delivery - certainly better than most first-time-events in the field of international aid. Why are you criticizing, did somebody deliver your OLPC XO to an underserved child living in a ger in Mongolia instead of to your 1st world luxury condo?* You do realize the target children come first, right? What's your beef - and if you haven't got one, why do you feel the need to characterize OLPC as "incompetent"?

      * I thought about saying "your parents' basement" but that would have been, well, mean-spirited. ;)
    11. Re:Seems a bit mean-spirited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm also in Canada, and waited 7 weeks for delivery. I don't remember OLPC promising any target delivery date, and I didn't expect one. I have 2 XO's on my desk now, and am really impressed with them. I am testing them before we deliver a set to schools in Guatemala, and they seem excellent for that purpose. Seems to me that this story is based on minimal facts, and more on feeding "XO dissatisfaction". David Pogue's commentary in the NY Times points out that this laptop (and its delivery) is not meant for snarky bloggers. Cut them some slack as they try to change the future of computing - and if you're not trying to help a schoolkid in a third-world country, quit griping about how fast your cutting-edge $200 laptop gets delivered. Doesn't seem to me like most of the commenters on this have an XO on order, but are just interested in criticizing the visionaries.

  14. No, most people would be patient... by gorim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the online tracking database worked. As of now you type in your email address or order number and it can't find you. This leads one to believe that the order was lost even though payment was already extracted. At least with your Dell shipment, Dell could tell you the order was in the system and will ship in X time.

  15. it wouldnt have anything to do with by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It wouldn't have anything to do with the fact that India seems to be the ones handling the support, and that they are the worst for such things, oops we lost your information...but don't worry it's ok. Just means you will have to wait extra long while we laugh at how stupid some big corporations are by outsourcing their work over seas seeing as their quality control is different then ours

    I know someone in the textiles industry and you would not believe the stuff they pull, shipments of 10,000 units with one pant leg 5 inches shorter then the other, then they say something like, we can give you a small rebate or try to fix it after the fact, which means you miss your deadline, which means penalty, which means revenue loss.

    And try to make them pay for it, your shipment will get stuck at the border on purpose, and stay there indefinitely. India is a piss poor country, you think they care if your shipment makwes it on time, when they have to worry about being able to get food to their homes, and find a way to
    pay the rent as the 1$ an hour job doesn't cut it...India sucks

  16. Guys, guys, OLPC are a charity! by Rogerborg · · Score: 1, Troll

    They don't have the funds to act like a real serious company. That would take millions of dollars of investment.

    Oh, wait a second...

    80,000 G1G1, at $400 per unit = $32,000,000. Since the "Give One" money really just goes into their general coffers, that's $16 million clear profit up front. A real startup would sacrifice its directors' children to be turn $16 million clear profit in 6 weeks.

    [Some OLPC hippy] says that the OLPC made a decision that getting laptops to developing nations was more important that[sic] delivering them to consumers.

    You Goddamn hippy retards. You. Do. Not. Fuck over your strongest advocates. Do these people actually want OLPC to fail? Because they seem to be doing their damndest to make that happen.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Guys, guys, OLPC are a charity! by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      "You. Do. Not. Fuck over your strongest advocates."

      Err.. surely their "strongest advocates" would be keen to get the laptops to the children, which (after all) is the whole friggin point of the exercise!

      For some reason, the term "fair weather friends" is coming into my mind...

    2. Re:Guys, guys, OLPC are a charity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err.. surely their "strongest advocates" would be keen to get the laptops to the children, which (after all) is the whole friggin point of the exercise!
      Knackers to that. Who pays the piper calls the tune, and those who are getting a freebie can just fucking well wait their turn. Ungrateful wog bastards.
    3. Re:Guys, guys, OLPC are a charity! by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      So... did those advocates just give OLPC $400?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:Guys, guys, OLPC are a charity! by foxharp · · Score: 1

      remember, these advocates are also people that gave good money to the cause -- $212, to be exact. so yes, in fact, they are strong advocates. there's nothing wrong with demanding some accountability from a charitable organization.

    5. Re:Guys, guys, OLPC are a charity! by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree. I'm not really defending OLPC, cause I don't know the ins and outs.

      However, I thought the GGP was rather harsh in the comment. It seems to me that people are whinging not about the charitable org not doing what they promised with the $$ (ie. delivering XOs to kiddies), but rather that they don't have their shiny new toy...

    6. Re:Guys, guys, OLPC are a charity! by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's exactly what they're "whinging" about. Since they're $400 out of pocket and it's apparently their responsibility to fix it, I wouldn't categorise it as "whinging" though. The deal was Give One Get One, not Donate $400 Get None.

      My primary "whinge" is that I want OLPC to succeed, and it really seems like they're doing everything possible to torpedo themselves. I think they need to let some grown ups run it for a while.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    7. Re:Guys, guys, OLPC are a charity! by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Yes. Is the concept of charity completely alien to you or something?

  17. Headline clarity issues by Robwiz · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Doesn't "Big Delays, Small Laptops: OLPC XO Recipients Mad" imply that some XO Recipients are mad because the laptop is small?

    The actual article is "Big Delays for Small Laptops", it's some of the people who haven't received them yet who are upset.
    I was expecting mine (in Canada) some time in February based on the initial delays in shipping to Canada. So I was quite pleased when it showed up last week.

    I guess that make me somewhat ineligible to advocate patience if you're still waiting for yours, but I can say that I wasn't disappointed in mine once it arrived.

  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  19. Fish bowl by WindBourne · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    there are probably less hassles with this group than is seen in a normal business, but since they are being attacked by MS and Intel, they are in a small fish bowl. I wonder if and how many of the orders were purposely done incorrect to make sure that there were issues? It is the perfect form of an attack and certainly within the scope of how either company operates.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  20. First Day Donors Got Theirs by argmanah · · Score: 2

    I donated the very first day they opened up the Give One Get One program and got my XO Laptop the Friday before Christmas (they sent an e-mail November 28th saying they were prioritizing first day donors and was trying to make delivery by Christmas).

    The machine itself is really neat. The battery life and outdoors readability is much better than my personal laptop and it covers 90% of what I use my laptop for when I'm on the go anyways (Web browsing and using ssh to connect to boxes at work/home). If it weren't for the fact that the keyboard is too small for an adult for long periods of use, I might have replaced my laptop with an OLPC one.

    --
    Overrated Moderation: This posts sucks... because.
    1. Re:First Day Donors Got Theirs by Captain+Chaos · · Score: 1

      Not all first day donors have received theirs yet according to postings at the forums on olpcnews.com. Many of them are probably among the 5,000 orders that had problems. I'm still waiting for mine, but I held off ordering until 12/30 due to overspending on Christmas.

      I'm really looking forward to the battery life and the outdoor readability myself. I've got a MacBook Pro right now and both of those are rather lacking. The outdoor readability is more due to my selection of the matte screen since I found the color more accurate and hated the reflections on the glossy screen when I compared them side by side. I'm also anxious to try the XO's ebook mode. I prefer my books printed on paper, but I've heard good things about that mode and may not mind reading some books that way.

  21. A lot of FUD here by Sir_Kurt · · Score: 1

    I ordered two of the laptops the morning of the first day by paypal, which charged my credit card. I received the laptops right on schedule. It is true that some folks did not, and some of them are screaming bloody blue murder. But it is also true that many of the bloggers who are making noise, are putting forth a very inaccurate story of what is going on. There is a concerted effort to smear the OLPC organization over this when the faults in the ordering process are clearly with third party companies. The OLPC organization is small, does not have a proffessionl department to manage spin, and is certainly being taken advantage of by people trying to take cheap shots to increase their hit rate.

    The other side of the coin is the concerted effort by Intel and Microsoft to smash the OLPC and the XO laptop, because the thing is great. Really great. Very low power, Very high functionality. Great screen. Great open source software. Extremly sturdy. Excellent wireless abilities. And designed for children. Really not much to complain about when you get down to it.

    Kurt

    1. Re:A lot of FUD here by driftwolf · · Score: 1

      I ordered mine late. OLPC has been really good about keeping me informed. Frankly, I bought it for two reasons. Yes, I want to have a closeup look at the design. But I also wanted to donate. If they put a priority on getting laptops to those who actually need them, I'm cool with that. I'll get mine eventually, that's all I need to know. I just hope that they don't get all corporate on us and start finding excuses. The best bet is to just tell the truth and go from there. As for those who are jumping all over their arse because it's "LATE", I don't recall seeing any promised delivery dates when I bought mine. So perhaps those folks should just chill out. It's a charity we're dealing with here, not Amazon or Tigerdirect. I'd rather they put their energy into delivering things to where they are needed (rather than just wanted) instead of diverting efforts and funds to becoming a retailer.

      --
      -- Motto: If it doesn't make sense, always follow the money.
  22. The should have just ... by Skapare · · Score: 1

    ... sold them through 3 or 4 hand picked online retailers, such as Amazon and Newegg and others. That way they could have bulk shipped them to those retailers and let the retailers handle the details like they are well experienced in doing.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  23. They maybe shouldn't have listened by pembo13 · · Score: 1

    They listened to all the market begging to release it to individuals. They do, and now it sucks. They should have maybe just kept to plan.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  24. Does anybody know... by WegianWarrior · · Score: 1

    A bit off topic, I know, but I'm sure I'm not the only one interested in knowing:

    Does anybody know if there is a chance for the G1G1 thing to happen in Europe too?

    I could have gotten one of my inlaws in the US (yes, my wife is from the USofA) to get one for me, but then the issue had been getting it over here... Norwegian Customs would likely have slapped a big fat import tax on it :(

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    1. Re:Does anybody know... by adriccom · · Score: 1

      It's being looked into. There were some extra regulatory hurdles for EU.

      No such thing has been announced, mind you.

      --
      <script>alert("I never liked JavaScript, really; it just seemed a bad idea.");</script>
  25. go to the source by KatTran · · Score: 2, Informative

    The actually source of all these stories might be interesting to people, instead of articles about the source. Since when did people stop being able to read primary sources and start being able to only read "news" articles.

    http://wiki.laptop.org/go/How_laptop_delivery_breaks

  26. but blaming Microsoft is better? by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    Get real dude.

    Sorry but the majority of the OLPC bad press is because THEY DESERVE IT.

    Did you ever think that some of their foolery needs an evil Microsoft just to dodge the issue? In other words - imply something that is not true but sounds good?

    IOW - Political speech 101.

    Talk about FUD.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  27. G2G0D1 donor, still waiting, but not mad. by Hobart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've shelled out $423.95 x 2 and am still waiting. And it's a shame that it's taking so long. But I'm happier that working-class kids in Mongolia (no, not "starving to death" people) have laptops, and I can wait. (I'm posting about it on THE INTERNET so clearly I'm not exactly struggling for 'net access.)

    They had pro-bono donation of services from three (or more) different companies to handle ordering and distribution. Not having a logistics manager or dealing with the process openly *is* a shame. Lots of individuals unaffiliated have been volunteering their time, trying to help, but have been powerless to actually *do* anything, since the volunteers don't have access to all of the data sets.

    Hopefully the next time they offer G1G1 they'll manage the order/delivery status themselves, they *should* be able to track each laptop from Quanta, to the shipping carrier, to the port, to FedEx.

    --
    o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
  28. You can't get replacement parts either by spike2131 · · Score: 1

    My XO developed a crack on the LCD after less than a day of normal use. I've been trying to get it replaced under warranty, but have yet to actually talk to a human. At this point, I would be happy to just go and buy the replacement LCD and put it in myself, but I've searched extensively and you just can't get spare parts for this thing....

    --
    SpyDock: Scientific Python in a Docker container
  29. Don't worry there will be plenty on eBay soon by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    delivering in bulk to just over a dozen countries is infinitely simpler than processing and delivering 80,000 individual laptops

    That's because individuals want what they paid for.

    When a few pallet loads go missing, containing units that don't belong to any specific person, that's just another bureaucratic "meh"?

    I suspect you will see plenty available on eBay once the bulk shipments get going in earnest.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  30. Maybe the problem is the non-profit part by amerinese · · Score: 1

    So maybe the whole problem is that it's not for profit. Maybe non-profit is the way to go when you are coming up with a vision and getting donors.

    But maybe you should ask PC manufacturers like Asus (manufacturer of the OLPC), people that, oh, I dunno, know a little something about logistics, cost management, customer service to put up bids when you actually want to get it done instead of running everything yourself.

    Like what is the problem here. It seems that they had no idea or experience in doing logistics, order fulfillment, customer service. They can't pay professionals to do this? They are funded. They have to pay people to do this anyway. It's like the "not invented here" problem for the non-profit "industry".

  31. It happened to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have three children, but I started with one laptop order because I'm not particularly wealthy and my youngest might be too young to benefit from the little lean green machine.

    Anyhow, I'm one of the unfortunates that entered a P.O. Box in the delivery address on the paypal page on November 12th. Luckily, I did pay with American Express though. More on that later.

    On 12/2, I called the OLPC folks to find out if I would be getting a confirmation number for the order, as the only response I'd received so far was an e-mail from paypal. At that time, a customer service rep was sharp enough to notice the P.O. Box and 'fix' the issue.

    Then I called back on the 20th because I hadn't seen hide nor hair of that little green temptress, and they had to 'fix' the P.O. Box issue again. At that time, I was told a supervisor would call me back. I wasn't particularly happy that I would be missing out on the laptop for Christmas, but I did feel like customer service was doing what they could. Until the supervisor never called. And I started reading blogs from other folks mentioning the 'supervisor will call you back' line and the failure to actually get callbacks.

    Finally, I tried to call both the G1G1 ordering line and the support line on the 8th and 9th of January but the line was continuously busy. On the G1G1 line, I got the message "All customer service reps are assisting other customers, please hang up and try again later". On the support line, I got "All circuits are busy". Great.

    So on the 9th I sent an e-mail to the support line saying I'd give them until Friday to initiate a cancellation of my order, or I'd start a charge back process through my American Express. Man oh man am I glad I used a credit card. I feel sorry for all those chaps that paid using their paypal or checking accounts. So I did start the charge back on 1/11. And I'm glad I did, because American Express has a 60 day policy for initiating charge backs, so I barely came in under the wire!

    To this date, I haven't received a reply to the cancellation request e-mail.

    The kicker is I did get through to G1G1 on 1/18. I wanted to let them know the charge back process was ongoing and give them the option of canceling. The best part is the customer service person told me 'No supervisor is available, but I can have them call you back' when she misunderstood that I was 'going' to do a charge back. Once I explained that I had already initiated the process, and that I was calling to be polite because I thought it would be easier for them to refund the money than have to deal with amex, she put me through to a supervisor immediately. The same supervisor that wasn't available 1 minute previously :)

    And of course, the supervisor promised to contact me Monday morning to let me know she'd started the refund process. And of course, she never did. It's like the cherry on the top that makes the dessert complete :)

    The grand finale is that the refund came through yesterday! Yeah baby!

    And now I'm shopping for XO competitors with that cold hard cash. And I think I'll keep my donations to local charities instead of pie in the sky groups for the immediate future.

    p.s. - Before I forget, I did get the following on 1/18, the same day I spoke with the supervisor to cancel. So now I'm worried it'll show up on my doorstep and I'll have to keep working with OLPC to figure out the mess...

    from OLPC Customer Care
    to +laptop@gmail.com,
    date Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 11:26 PM
    subject Your XO Laptop Is On Its Way
    mailed-by bounce.resultsmail.com

    Dear Donor,

    We are contacting you to provide an update on your Give One Get One donation and the shipment of your laptop.

    We are very sorry for the delay in the processing of your donation. This email confirms that your donation now has been successfully processed and has been sent to our warehouse for shipment.

    Your XO laptop will ship next week and we will send

  32. Not mad at all by Gruuk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm a December 14th donor; while I'm a little disappointed that it hasn't reached me yet, I've no problem cutting OLPC quite a bit of slack, as what matters most is the "GIVE 1" part of the G1G1 program. There are plenty of articles showing that kids in less fortunate areas have started using them and they are a hit. Because OLPC is fulfilling that part of the promise, I will be patient and forgive them those delays, although I am somewhat less forgiving of the subcontractors (but not terribly so).

    I can wait a couple more weeks; the only thing that bugs me is that I can't play with it right now, as I've seen and handled an XO and it is so neat :)

    --
    De gustibus et coloribus non est disputandum
  33. First Day Donors Got Theirs, NOT! by SpaceGhost · · Score: 1

    I purchased mine by noon on the first day. Paypal charged my amex the same day. Still no laptop. I emailed 2 weeks ago, got a bounce that said they'd get back to me in 3-5 days, and nothing else. I called yesterday, and they said my paypal address was wrong, which they corrected online, and said I'd get an email with tracking info once thay have it.
    It sounds like a programming error is messing up some addresses (I've bought at least 5 packages on ebay with the same paypal shipping address since November.) But the donation went through immediately.
    I'm not mad, I expect to really enjoy the device, and am glad that some kid got one too. But is it that hard to dump out a list of names and make some "we know it's not there yet" emails? I'm not that surprised by the delay, but am by the failure to address this proactively, and hope that these are only growing pains.

  34. the silence is the problem by xeno · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I ordered two -- in the first hour of the first day of the promotion -- to be shipped to my house in the US. As of today, I have nothing. No laptops, no email, no nuthin.' I phoned and confirmed that my order number does exist and indeed I have been charged for both the laptops (in November) and $50 for shipping (the day after Christmas).

    But it's not the lack of laptops that's turning me from an interested and cheerful donor, to mild annoyance when it didn't show up before Christmas, to contemplating reversing the charges. It's the lack of information. Sure, there are delays. Sure, there are priorities for getting big shipments out to major educational recipients. But I gave these folks $850, and I don't even get the courtesy of a *status* message?

    According to the schedule, mine should have showed up a month ago -- at the absolute latest. Before Christmas. I made the mistake of telling my kids about it, thinking I would teach them something about partnerships and donations, etc etc, and that's my own fault. But *still* even after phone calls and tracing and corrections... when I check the laptopgiving.org page, it tells me the order number is invalid, and that my email address is not found.

    The kicker is that I work for a UN agency that manages large refugee aid programs, and I had to borrow an OLPC from a friend to show it to the Education & IT department directors. They're very interested in the OLPC, as it fits some of the educational needs pretty nicely. What am I going to tell these guys when they ask whether the project is well-run, has decent governance, and can deliver?

    Sheesh.

    -Jon

    --
    I think not...(*poof*)
    1. Re:the silence is the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least some one is in a worse position than I am. I am in exactly the same situation as you, except that I thankfully ordered just one laptop (er, I ordered two but am getting one). This after I get up at 5 am to order on the first day. sigh.

    2. Re:the silence is the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never knew that philanthropy carried with it such an enormous feeling of entitlement.

    3. Re:the silence is the problem by Axello · · Score: 1

      I ordered 'first-day' and received my OLPC laptop before christmas. I also received various 'welcome' and 'your xo laptop just shipped' messages. Maybe I was just lucky? Surely you have the confirmation or CC/PayPal e-mail to convince them you paid?

  35. Normal to receive only a PayPal confirmation? by Richard+Mills · · Score: 1

    I placed a G1G1 order near the end of 2007, and the only confirmation I ever received was a PayPal payment confirmation. Can anyone tell me if I should have received some sort of confirmation email from the OLPC Foundation itself?

    I consider my G1G1 order to mostly be a charitable contribution, so I'm fine if it takes them quite a while to ship my laptop. But I'd like to have some sort of confirmation from OLPC to let me know that they even realize I placed one. Did other folks receiving any other sort of confirmation before being told that their laptop was supposed to ship at X date? I've tried contacting the OLPC folks, but I have never been able to reach anyone.

    1. Re:Normal to receive only a PayPal confirmation? by foxharp · · Score: 1

      yes, you should have gotten something from OLPC. call 800-379-7017 or 800-201-7144 to get a "real" confirmation number from OLPC, and to verify your address is correct, and deliverable.

    2. Re:Normal to receive only a PayPal confirmation? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I placed a G1G1 order near the end of 2007, and the only confirmation I ever received was a PayPal payment confirmation. Can anyone tell me if I should have received some sort of confirmation email from the OLPC Foundation itself?

      I consider my G1G1 order to mostly be a charitable contribution, so I'm fine if it takes them quite a while to ship my laptop. But I'd like to have some sort of confirmation from OLPC to let me know that they even realize I placed one. Did other folks receiving any other sort of confirmation before being told that their laptop was supposed to ship at X date? I've tried contacting the OLPC folks, but I have never been able to reach anyone. I had the same problem, turns out my confirmation email was in my gmail spam folder, I just found it there.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  36. Well trust *me* then... by Gordo_1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All I want is for OLPC to survive and make a positive impact worldwide -- and that's why I participated in G1G1. But let me tell you, it's amateur hour as far as logistics go. They naively thought that because the laptop hardware was ready, everything else would magically fall into place, so they rushed all starry-eyed into shipping laptops before Christmas. As it turns out, their completely untested shipping and support infrastructure was inadequate given the load.

    I've received a total of 3 different tracking numbers for my single laptop over the past 2 months. All 3 are invalid according to Fedex. I've called, verified that they have my correct address and been told my laptop was in the queue to ship a month ago. I was subsequently promised a delivery by the end of the year, then by January 15th, both of which have come and gone. Then they promised to reveal the shipping date by this Wednesday in an email sent on Monday. On Thursday they backed off of that claim, and said that hardware supply issues were at fault and assured me that I would receive another email at some point in the future with a shipping date. And so the saga continues...

    Look, I'm cutting them a lot of slack because they're a non-profit trying to get off the ground and the primary goal here is to get laptops into the hands of needy children... but the problem is that they've been a model of evasive, unhelpful and secretive with regard to logistics problems from the start. If they had said, "hey we'll do our best to get you a laptop by March 2008" from the beginning, I think we all would have gone on with our lives, but for a not insignificant number of us, it's been one story after another -- all of which leads some of us to wonder whether the organization is hiding something with regard to our charitable donations.

    Anyway, I fully comprehend that G1G1 logistics issues do not imply that they'll have problems fulfilling orders overseas. And in fact, the G1G1 program was for the most part an afterthought with regard to OLPC's primary mission. However, I think they've hurt themselves a great deal by not getting their act together with G1G1. Third-world purchase estimates have been cut by orders of magnitude since the heady days when Dr. Negroponte went around boasting that they wouldn't even talk to countries who weren't willing to buy a million laptops. The G1G1 program has become an instrumental tool in seeding laptop programs in places where reluctant national governments have backed off of early purchase promises. By pissing off G1G1 donors, they've essentially bit the hand that feeds them, and this will make it that much more difficult to realize Dr. Negroponte's original vision of one laptop per child.

    1. Re:Well trust *me* then... by schwaang · · Score: 1

      It's too bad they didn't partner with an operation like Dell or Amazon, at least for orders in north america, which is probably the bulk. They would have had to convince some company to do it out of good will, (perhaps as a tax-deductible donation of service with PR bragging rights).

      But as you and others have pointed out, OLPC isn't in the retail business, so I don't take their troubles with G1G1 fulfillment too seriously.

  37. spammers die bloody by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    I'm a December 14th donor; while I'm a little disappointed that it hasn't reached me yet, I've no problem cutting OLPC quite a bit of slack, as what matters most is the "GIVE 1" part of the G1G1 program. There are plenty of articles showing that kids in less fortunate areas have started using them and they are a hit. Because OLPC is fulfilling that part of the promise, I will be patient and forgive them those delays, although I am somewhat less forgiving of the subcontractors (but not terribly so).

    I can wait a couple more weeks; the only thing that bugs me is that I can't play with it right now, as I've seen and handled an XO and it is so neat :) Amen, brother. But this article got me following links, one of them gave a very basic hint I should have thought about before: Check your spam bin.
    Turns out OLPC had been sending me status updates about the delays and whatnot, I was just not seeing them.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:spammers die bloody by Gruuk · · Score: 1

      Cool nickname, I used to read Scrameustache comics as a kid.

      Yeah, I received a few of them in my spam folder; I adjusted the settings and new OLPC emails now show up in my inbox. Thank you Yahoo mail for protecting me so well ;)

      --
      De gustibus et coloribus non est disputandum
  38. lets play monopoly! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Seriously, corporations suck - in my experience they're much more hopeless than government organisations. I reckon that whoever says the opposite has an agenda.
    If you don't like a company's service, you can always choose another. Nope.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  39. They lost a bunch of orders... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is that they lost a bunch of orders, especially first-day ones, I guess.
    No doubt it had something to do with the amount of traffic they got.

    They couldn't really send you a message if your order was lost. Hopefully, they'll recover it soon.

  40. Re:First Day Donors "Got Theirs" by backbyter · · Score: 1

    11/12/07 Ordered XO through the G1G1 program, paid via CC/Paypal.

    11/14/07 Received two emails, one thanking me for my support, the second informing me that OLPC would attempt to deliver prior to the holidays.

    01/04/08 Received email stating that my order has shipped and how to track the order. Followed links from laptopgiving to FedEx. Tracking information showed that my order was already "out for delivery". Wow! I thought, I'll have it in time for the G'kids visit. Then I noticed that the package was being delivered to Washougal, Washington and not Abingdon, Virginia where I live. I sent a note off to OLPC's support informing them that delivery was off by some 2,600 miles.

    01/15/08 Received response to my support query:

    Dear Donor,

    I was able to track your order and I do show your package was delivered
    bellow is the tracking information from FedEx:

    Insert cut and paste from FedEx showing the package delivered.

    01/16/08 Responded to OLPC's email of the 15th with comments that they had missed the point of the email. West Coast/East Coast -- not the same thing.

    01/24/08 Received the following:
    We are in receipt of your inquiry and will respond to you as soon as
    possible. Please note due to overwhelming response, we may not be able to
    immediately respond to your inquiry, however, you will be contacted. The
    first mailing phase is scheduled to ship out just before the holidays, and I
    assure you that this will be rectified before your laptop is shipped out.

    I am now really interested in what the next email will bring. Maybe I'll be in line for version 2 or 3 of the XO.

  41. Yes, there's a chance... by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Informative

    Does anybody know if there is a chance for the G1G1 thing to happen in Europe too? Europeans interested in the One Laptop Per Child Project's XO laptop may soon have the chance through a "give one, get one" offer similar to that offered in North America last year.
    "At some point we might do it in Europe," said Walter Bender, OLPC's president,
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  42. In The Same Boat... by AndrewJ-NYC · · Score: 1

    I was a Day One donor, and I haven't received my laptop yet, though I *have* received two emails telling me that their delivery software is telling them they can't ship to my address. I used my work address, which is a confirmed PayPal address to which I've had literally dozens of online purchases shipped over the last three and a half years, so that makes no sense. If they say they had problems with PayPal data, I guess that sort of explains it. I wrote them after the first "we can't deliver it" email, authorizing them to send it to my home address, and never received a reply. Thet opened a 24/7 customer service phone number on Jan 22, and when I called them on the 23rd they promised me I can expect to receive my XO laptop at the work address within the next 10 days. My fingers are crossed...

  43. Oh yes, the corps. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Vista delayed by MS for years.

    Nintendo running out of Wii stock.

    Waiting list for Asuss EEE PC? At least one month.

    Those corps, so organized and ready to make business.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Oh yes, the corps. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Waiting list for Asuss EEE PC? At least one month.

      I bought mine a couple of days ago from a discount electronics place. There was a bit of a rush before christmas but that happens with a lot of new products.

  44. Agreed. Haven't got mine yet, but no worries... by Omega · · Score: 1

    I didn't contribute to G1G1 to buy a laptop. Getting an XO was the bonus. The reason I contributed was because it's a charity, it was x-mas and I was feeling charitable.

    If the story was that OLPC lost all of their money backing a player in Texas Hold 'Em, I'd be pissed off. Instead, they're focusing on delivering laptops to the third-world and giving the gift laptop to the first world ran into some troubles.

    Yep, I got several e-mails. First a few in December telling me I wouldn't get my laptop by x-mas. Then early in January saying it was coming Jan 15th. Then later saying it wasn't coming yet. No biggie. When I get it, it'll be a fun toy. But it gets here when it gets here.

    In the mean time, OLPC should focus on the mission of getting computers to 3rd world kids -- that's what's important.

  45. What about the "give many" option? by andres32a · · Score: 1

    I just contacted OLPC for the "give many" option, since i'm looking for 120 laptops for the school that i run located in Latin America. I got a response from someone from brightstarcorp.com the same day indicating the price and asking for a shiping address so he could send me the official quote. So once i get the quote our school will be wiring 36'000 usd plus shipping... should i be worried?

    1. Re:What about the "give many" option? by Gordo_1 · · Score: 1

      I don't think you're going to lose your money or anything, but I don't have great confidence that they can deliver those computers in the near-term (next 4-6 weeks) based on what I've seen so far. Ask them to clearly define a delivery window for your laptops and ask whether the ongoing G1G1 inventory backlog will have any effect on your laptops. Who knows, your donation may get the proper attention it deserves since it's for a large number.

  46. FUD - Slashdot suckered in. by susie457 · · Score: 1

    OLPC is one of the greatest threats Microsoft and Intel have faced. They are doing all they can to spread FUD including setting up dummy accounts in forums and elsewhere to discredit OLPC. Sadly, they are now using Slashdot itself to eliminate OLPC.

  47. Re: Working class? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

    I don't see what I would call "working class" kids in any of those photos that you claim shows them. What I see and is demonstrated by the photographs is the children of nomadic farmers attending school in uniforms. I don't know how you could even infer that they are "working class". Given the GDP of Mongolia and the per capita income along with the nomadic lifestyle I fail to see how you could even apply that term to any students from the nation in question even when applying racism and infering that because you see well cared for children that are clean with clean uniforms somehow implies they are "working class" (the meaning of the word implying they aren't poor).

  48. Where are you from? by mstahl · · Score: 1

    Soviet Russia?

  49. I wanted one. by reiisi · · Score: 1

    Still do.

    Had I had the money to order, though, I would have done so in the recognition this was going to happen, and not caring.

    I guess I was hoping most of the others who were ordering understood, from what we knew about costs and from the price, that there was a certain risk and were ordering in the same frame of mind that I would have been. That was perhaps naive on my part.

    If I had the money, I'd donate enough money to cover hiring a logistics company to pull things out. (If I had that kind of money, I'd already be a backer, and I'd have arranged the logistics as soon as I heard they were considering the G1G1 program. But, having said that, I'm wondering if that kind of funding up front would not have potentially been picked at by iNTEL and Micro$oft as tantamount to dumping.)

    But I'll say this, too. If I had the money, I'd be fishing: "Not willing to wait it out? Sell me your order." I'd refrain from the temptation to not offer full price, too. Not because I think I could resell them high, but because I want to leave naysayers as little room to say stupid things as possible.

    Anyway, my advice to all who were able to get orders in, wait. Time waiting is a good way to support the project, too.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  50. not to be picky, but by reiisi · · Score: 1

    Red Cross should not be brought into this. They have enough overhead problems already.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  51. When in doubt, assume the malign. by reiisi · · Score: 1

    You claim that's clear profit, but they have made the obligation to deliver those XOs.

    So, no, it is most definitely _not_ clear profit. Neither clear nor profit.

    If you don't understand that, you also don't understand that, when you get your paycheck, the money out of it that you owe your landlord for the month you've been living in your apartment since you paid rent last is not really yours. You control it until you pay your rent, but it is by no means clear.

    As for whether this constitutes backstabbing your strongest advocates, others have already dealt with it.

    If you ordered (one+)one, you're a twice a fool if you don't just wait it out. If you didn't order one, you shouldn't be crudding up 'net with your instant accusations against people who are trying to do a lot of good but got bit by the scale of what they are doing. If everyone waited for absolute assurance nothing would go wrong before doing anything good, the only things that would get done would not be good.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
    1. Re:When in doubt, assume the malign. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, nick flies 300+ days/year.

      Who do you think buys those plane tickets?

  52. Re: Working class? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. What a racist.

  53. Get it, gawk it, give it away by lanner · · Score: 1

    I did get my OLPC XO. I bought it the first day the you can order via the buy-one-get-one program. I received it some time back in late December. I showed it around the office, to some friends, and gave it a good shake down test. It was impressive and I thought was fairly well designed.

    Then, I gave it away;

    http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-January/009361.html

    I would encourage others who have received XOs and don't know what to do with them to do similar. Find a developer or someone who can really use it, and then give it away. Otherwise, contribute to the cause by helping with educational programs, improving the code, or writing documentation. Porting Doom, writing a new MP3 player, or bitching about performance is not helping.

    It is not a general-use laptop. It's an educational tool. I don't think most Slashdot readers understand that.

  54. I haven't received mine, yet. by HouseOfMisterE · · Score: 1

    I placed an order for for an XO through the "Give One, Get One" program on December 31 and haven't received mine, yet. I have received a couple of status update emails, though, so I'm not that concerned. Hopefully I'll receive it soon. In the meantime, I've loaded up the newest XO OS image file in QEMU to try things out. Kinda interesting, but I'll probably try and load an alternate OS on the XO hardware.

  55. Since you've got yours, you wouldn't know.... by pem · · Score: 1

    that you can wait on hold for 3 hours and still not talk to anybody.

    How do you convince somebody of something if you can't communicate with them???????

  56. There already are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  57. This is bullshit by pem · · Score: 1

    This has nothing to do with Microsoft OR Intel. At home, I have used Linux since 99, and I haven't owned an Intel processor since the 386. Currently, I run Ubuntu on AMD boxes.

    I ordered a laptop in December.

    My credit card was billed December 17th.

    I finally got curious, tried to track it. Get this message from the website: "We are working hard to ship all XO Laptops. If you are unable to track your laptop or have not received it, please contact OLPC Donor Services by calling 1-800-201-7144 for assistance"

    I tried to call up. I was on hold for two hours, then had to leave.

    I sent an email, explaining that I couldn't track it online or reach a human, and was curious when I could expect the laptop.

    Received the following response:

    Hello *******- Thank You for participating in our Give One Get One program.
    I'm sorry that we did not keep our word and get the laptop to you by
    January15th. We are working really hard to get that laptop out to you ASAP-
    we're shipping laptops daily. Remember -you can track your order by going
    to www.laptopgiving.org and clicking track your order- you then provide your
    e-mail address as well as your reference number- you will then be provided
    with a tracking number or a message. If you have any questions/concerns
    call and speak to a representative 1(800) 201-7144. Thank You for your
    patience.
    OLPC
    Donor Services

    Now you can call this FUD all you want, but this a FACTUAL DESCRIPTION of MY interaction with the OLPC project. You only have so long to dispute a VISA transaction, so I want to make sure they have a record of my transaction on their end. I'm not getting that warm fuzzy, so after a couple of weeks, I will probably have to explain to my VISA card issuer to cancel the transaction due to non-delivery.

    I could write off the whole thing as a donation, but that wasn't the deal, and nothing pisses me off more than someone unilaterally altering the deal, and I don't care whether the alteration is due to malice or incompetence. I donate a lot to charity. I will give someone the shirt off my back if they ask nicely, but if they try to take it away from me, I will probably kill them.