Slashdot Mirror


NPD Group Says "Wait! HD-DVD Isn't Dead Yet"

The NPD group, owners of the not-quite-as-popular-as-they-had-hoped HD-DVD format, attempted to battle back against the tide of "naysayers" who claim that the format war is over and have declared Blu-Ray Disc the winner. "While select articles have implied that HD-DVD as a format is doomed and the sky is falling for the format's supporters, the NPD Group this afternoon reinforced that sales results from a single week do not necessarily indicate a trend, and that the week in question had several intriguing variables that have gone unreported."

44 of 279 comments (clear)

  1. A Modest Proposal by divide+overflow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the NPD Group really wants to shake things up they ought to offer free HD-DVD licenses.

    1. Re:A Modest Proposal by BosstonesOwn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They need to get burners to market in mass quantity as well as offer those licenses for free or very very small royalties.

      Like pennies per unit. Plus they need to get the consumer on their side. The more hd-dvd players out there the more the industry has to listen. Unfortunately with the economy tanking this is hard. Right now I personally would put money making on the back burner and just look to break even. Make hd-dvd discs cheaper to buy then a normal dvd and make the players cheaper. At that point this whole thing can turn around , with consumer demand the studios have to listen. If smaller studios stick to the format then there really can be a price market , smaller studios usually make lower cost films and don't need to recoup so much back.

      The reason I say they need burners in high volume asap, is that whether they like it or not piracy is often times a real boost to sales. It's been proven that it helps.( http://www.stargeek.com/item/41324.html ) ( http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-0.html?forumID=102&threadID=243454 )

      The american and canadian dbs providers , even cable can thank piracy for large subscriber growth. They really should get those burners out in high volumes fast.

      --
      This package Does Not Contain a Winner
    2. Re:A Modest Proposal by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm trying to work out why the submitter thinks the NPD group has anything to do with HD DVD at all, let alone that they're the supporters. You appear to think the same thing. NPD is a market research firm. They, amongst other things, collect tallies of sales figures and pass this on to analysts and industry. They're complaining that various outlets misinterpreted their latest figures showing an immediate drop in HD DVD player sales just after the Warner announcement. One of those outlets was Slashdot, yesterday. They're not "supporters" of HD DVD, any more than they're "supporters" of Blu-ray.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:A Modest Proposal by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Interesting
      It isn't just piracy. As a pc tech I would LOVE a cheap HD-DVD burner to use to back up mine and my customers data files. Plus it would be great for discs full of drivers, older software, etc. Even if it was only the 25Gb discs that were cheap, I think a lot of folks would buy them for backups. I really think they could turn this around ( and have said so in previous posts on the subject) if they can get cheap burners and media into the hands of the public.


      Blu-Ray at this point is simply too expensive to be any good for backups,at least for me. And I care more about burning my own media than I do about formats, which is why I and a LOT of people I know are sticking with DVD.And let us not forget that the cheapness of digicams and other forms of user content creation. And people are a lot more used to being able to burn a disc and share it with friends than passing around hard drives. I just hope they are forward thinking enough to see this instead of helping Blu-Ray kill the competition by keeping licenses high.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re:A Modest Proposal by ZorinLynx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >Blu-Ray at this point is simply too expensive to be any good for backups

      Just wait a little longer. If history teaches us anything, it's that tech never stays expensive for long.

      And consider hard drives for backups. Less expensive per gig, faster, and more versatile.

    5. Re:A Modest Proposal by RetardsForRonPaul · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Have you seen the Transformers HD DVD? The extra features are amazing. And the tech they used to do it all has been in the spec from day one. It's one of the few HD DVDs I actually own.

      Particularly high quality with great DRM. The HD-DVD's failure in DRM is a big reason why they lost. If you are so opposed to DRM, then you need to give up on optical movies. Perhaps that's a shame, I don't know, but it's the truth. Fine, but keep in mind why that DRM is there. It's not to prevent piracy. Its so you can't format shift it to your iPod and they can charge you a buck for the pleasure. Its so you cant make a backup for when your kids scratch the disc. It's so you can't find a better price from an overseas retailer. It's so you can't do any with the disc you just purchased unless the studio wants to (and gets to milk you for more money). And I dont know what you mean by HD-DVDs failure in DRM. AACS has been cracked on both platforms. Yes, Blu-Ray has that abomination called BD+, but that will be cracked. The only failure is that HD-DVD actually had the consumer's interest in mind, too, which makes studio execs cry.
    6. Re:A Modest Proposal by morari · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I can assure you that without a solid method of piracy I won't be switching over from DVD films any time soon. NetFlix, a spindle of blank discs, and a few mouse clicks per film has increased my collection exponentially. :P

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    7. Re:A Modest Proposal by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Blu-Ray at this point is simply too expensive to be any good for backups,at least for me. And I care more about burning my own media than I do about formats, which is why I and a LOT of people I know are sticking with DVD.And let us not forget that the cheapness of digicams and other forms of user content creation.

      I'm genuinely curious - why are you (and just about every other geek who just doesn't want to back up his porn collection) so interested in an untested format for archival purposes? DVDs and CDs really aren't all that robust if you really want that data stored. Is there any info on the (presumed) shelf life of user-burned HD / Bluray disks? Inquiring minds want to know.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:A Modest Proposal by Cyphertube · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I personally hate Blu-Ray about as much as I hate DVD. I can't stand the region encoding, primarily because I have travelled a lot and I'm a linguist. I like to be able to buy foreign films, or foreign releases of films so that I can have subtitles in languages I want or be able to see the films I want. I don't know many places that will release Finnish films in a US region format.

      That's one of the beauties about HD television, in that we use the same standards. So I love HD-DVD. If I buy an HD-DVD in the UK, Finland, China, or Australia, I can watch it in the US. Yeah, that sucks for the studios who want control, but the reality of the DVD region-coding was that it increased piracy. Every cent they try to recoup from creating the encryption raises the price and the market will not tolerate it. It's just like with music, where the market thinks $10 is a good price for a CD and Wal-Mart sells out of CDs priced like that for their release, but too many companies try to get $15-$20 for CDs with maybe two good songs. Well, the market reacts, and piracy abounds.

      Most of my region 1 DVDs I reward the idiot consortium by buying them at Blockbuster for $5, instead of buying them brand new. If I have no region-locking, I will pay more, as when I get tired of a movie, or think it's not so great, I can trade it with a friend for another film. I will pay for good product, but not for product that fails me when I move again.

      --
      Linux - because it doesn't leave that Steve Ballmer aftertaste.
    9. Re:A Modest Proposal by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Actually I have had pretty good luck with the really cheap media,as well. I know I am dating myself(but hell I'm too dang old to care) but I was one of those idiots that bought a $200 4X DVD burner when they first came out,so I have some discs going back 5-6 years. And I have bought mostly whatever was on sale at the time,and so far no problems. I have found if you keep them out of direct light and are VERY careful in how you handle them(I found this out from my nephews who spin the discs on the spindle when looking for discs,ouch) they work great with no read errors.


      Plus I think that a lot of folks out there have stuff they want to back up that is really pointless for anything other than discs. I have about a spindle full of drivers for most of the major pc manufacturers from my days at the repair shop. It would be crazy to waste the money on a HDD for stuff I only need once in a blue moon,whereas it is only 25c to back it up on DVD. And at that price I can afford to make more than one copy of things I really want to keep.


      And for those of you who have a disc that has trouble reading, I have had very good luck with this. I know most of the recovery tools are bunk, but I've recovered discs with this that literally looked like someone had played hockey with them. Great tool to have in your toolkit.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    10. Re:A Modest Proposal by Wdomburg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a finalized spec, but it's silly to say that Blu-ray also doesn't have a finalized spec. For watching movies, it's finalized enough. They are adding newer stupid features. Totally ok.

      Really? It's silly to say there isn't a finalized spec? Care to explain why there isn't a signle 2.0 player on the market yet, then?

      As for whether it's "finalized enough" is a matter of opinion. If I'm going to pay a premium price for discs I want to be able to access all the features, period. Maybe you don't personally see value in downloadable content or in-movie experience features (video commentary, live storyboards, pre-effects footage, etc) but I do.

      Cheaper for sure, but so what? Eventually blu-ray will be MUCH cheaper (I'm willing to bet money on it).

      Sure, any volume electronics get cheaper over time. I prefer sooner rather than later. And this isn't just about players - mastering, design and production costs are also significantly lower, thereby allowing cheaper software as well.

      And the audio codec are mandatory because HD-DVD is inferior. Period. They cannot fit uncompressed audio and must use compression, so of course there's a mandatory codec. You say space is wasted on uncompressed as though it's impossible to hear the difference. It's not, studies have proven it, I can tell, and why not have absolutely perfect audio? Audio is blu-ray's best feature.

      You're a moron. Lossless codecs like TrueHD and DTS Master Audio produce an identical bitstream. Uncompressed audio buys you nothing but wasted space and bandwidth.

      Not sure what your point for combo discs means. I don't need combo discs for blu-ray devices because obviously blu-ray will be in every $50 drive in five years. You can't get a combo disc for most movies, since most studios aren't on HD-DVD. Just a lame point.

      That's fabulous in five years. Right now I enjoy being able to play my disks in my HD DVD player, my three DVD players, my three DVD drives, my portable DVD player and the car DVD player I'm picking up for the kids. Even if I spent the thousands it would cost to replace everything now, there are no portable Blu-ray drives (and little value to having one ... 7" and 9" screens aren't going to be HD resolution any time soon).

      I can see sticking with DVD. It's certainly good enough for enjoying films. you can't beat the slection. But you insist you're sticking with HD-DVD, and I don't really know how that's possible. Anyone with two brain cells to rub together knows that Toshiba is liquidating, the studios are leaving, and there's not going to be a bundh of players or movies to stick to. It's like my asserting I will stick to Betamax until VHS is far more compelling. WTF deos that even mean? That I won't be watching any movies? Stick away, pal.

      It means just what I said, I'll stick with HD DVD combo discs and DVD for the foreseeable future. They play in all my current devices, they'll play in all my future devices as well (even BD, since they play DVD5 and DVD9 just fine).

      As for whether Toshiba is liquidating, I don't buy it. I think they're making a legitimate effort to continue establishing the format. You obviously disagree. I don't care.

      The market is choosing blu-ray 9:1 over hd-dvd without even counting PS3s, so I think you're going to change your mind.

      The fact that you quote figures from a single week of sales after the research firm that provided them publicly stated not to take them serious illustrates nicely why I don't put much stock in your judgement.

      The HD-DVD's failure in DRM is a big reason why they lost. If you are so opposed to DRM, then you need to give up on optical movies. Perhaps that's a shame, I don't know, but it's the truth.

      I would say it's more Sony literallly owning several movie studios and spending billions subsidizing the Playstation 3 to submarine the format into as many households as possible. The lack of extensible DRM was a secondary i

    11. Re:A Modest Proposal by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You'll be happy to know that after the BD camp claimed themselves the "winner", that the next generation of BD 2.0 players will actually increase in price to $600 or more. A monopoly is a beautiful thing.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    12. Re:A Modest Proposal by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean like how the DVD monopoly has resulted in $600+ players?

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
  2. Why the hate? by Berkyjay · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So does everyone here hate HD DVD because of some orrational hatred of Microsoft? I personally like HD DVD for it's cheaper price and the lack of heavy handed tactics used to try and force us all to convert. One of us. One of us. One of us.

  3. This calls for ... by laejoh · · Score: 2, Funny

    A customer enters a multimedia shop.

    Customer: 'Ello, I wish to register a complaint.

    (The owner does not respond.)

    C: 'Ello, Miss?

    Owner: What do you mean "miss"?

    C: I'm sorry, I have a cold. I wish to make a complaint!

    O: We're closin' for lunch.

    C: Never mind that, my lad. I wish to complain about this hd-dvd what I purchased not half an hour ago from this very boutique.

    O: Oh yes, the, uh, the format...What's,uh...What's wrong with it?

    C: I'll tell you what's wrong with it, my lad. 'E's dead, that's what's wrong with it!

    O: No, no, 'e's uh,...he's resting.

    C: Look, matey, I know a dead hd-dvd when I see one, and I'm looking at one right now.

    O: No no he's not dead, he's, he's restin'! Remarkable format, the hd-dvd, idn'it, ay? Beautiful plumage!

    C: The plumage don't enter into it. It's stone dead.

    O: Nononono, no, no! 'E's resting!

    C: All right then, if he's restin', I'll wake him up!

    (shouting at the hardware)

    'Ello, HD-DVD! I've got a lovely fresh cuttle movie for you if you show...(owner hits the hardware)

    O: There, he moved!

    C: No, he didn't, that was you hitting the hardware!

    O: I never!!

    C: Yes, you did!

    O: I never, never did anything...

    C: (yelling and hitting the hardware repeatedly) 'ELLO HD!!!!!

    Testing! Testing! Testing! Testing! This is your nine o'clock alarm call!

    (Takes hd-dvd out of the hardware and thumps its head on the counter. Throws it up in the air and watches it plummet to the floor.)

    C: Now that's what I call a dead hd-dvd.

    O: No, no.....No, 'e's stunned!

    C: STUNNED?!?

    O: Yeah! You stunned him, just as he was wakin' up! Formats stun easily, major.

    C: Um...now look...now look, mate, I've definitely 'ad enough of this. That hd-dvd is definitely deceased, and when I purchased it not 'alf an hour ago, you assured me that its total lack of movement was due to it bein' tired and shagged out following a prolonged squawk.

    O: Well, he's...he's, ah...probably pining for the fjords.

    C: PININ' for the FJORDS?!?!?!? What kind of talk is that?, look, why did he fall flat on his back the moment I got 'im home?

    O: The hd-dvd format prefers kippin' on it's back! Remarkable format, id'nit, squire? Lovely plumage!

    C: Look, I took the liberty of examining that hd-dvd when I got it home, and I discovered the only reason that it had been sitting in its hardware in the first place was that it had been NAILED there.

    (pause)

    O: Well, o'course it was nailed there! If I hadn't nailed that bird down, it would have nuzzled up to those bars, bent 'em apart with its beak, and VOOM! Feeweeweewee!

    C: "VOOM"?!? Mate, this hd-dvd wouldn't "voom" if you put four million volts through it! 'E's bleedin' demised!

    O: No no! 'E's pining!

    C: 'E's not pinin'! 'E's passed on! This hd-dvd is no more! He has ceased to be! 'E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker!

    'E's a stiff! Bereft of life, 'e rests in peace! If you hadn't nailed 'im to the perch 'e'd be pushing up the daisies!
    'Is metabolic processes are now 'istory! 'E's off the twig!
    'E's kicked the bucket, 'e's shuffled off 'is mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin' choir invisibile!!

    THIS IS AN HD-DVD!!

    1. Re:This calls for ... by stormguard2099 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the correct answer is a shorter quote...

      --
      http://greenobyl.com/ please.... think of the children!!
  4. Bad Summary, NPD Doesn't Own HD-DVD by rsmith-mac · · Score: 4, Informative

    The summary is partially incorrect. The NPD Group is a research firm, they do not own the HD-DVD format or anything close to it. The closest thing to HD-DVD's owners would be the DVD Forum, which is a consortium of companies.

    The reason NPD is involved in this is because they are one of the big research firms for tracking sales data. NPD is the firm that released the earlier reporting talking about HD-DVD hardware sales slowing and this is a clarification of that. They are pointing out that one week's results can not be extrapolated to argue that HD-DVD is dying/dead like many people did, it's too short of a time period in a week with several unusual variables.

  5. Misleading summary by brianmotzen · · Score: 2, Informative

    NPD group is not an owner of the HD-DVD format. They are just a bunch of market analysts who provide information to retailers. See their website : http://www.npd.com/corpServlet?nextpage=profile_s.html

    --
    There are two kind of people, those who win and those who whine
  6. Might as well ask the same in reverse by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So do you hate BluRay because of some irrational hatred of Sony? I personally like BluRay because it comes free with a PS3 and the lack of have handed tactics by MS (such as buying support) used to try and force us all to convert. One of us. One of us. One of us.

    Frankly if you want to look at the sides involved you could at most choose the lesser of two evils, lets see who is the convicted monopolist again? Who is the rootkit company again? Who insist on ignoring standards and enforcing their own inferior solutions on the public?

    Sorry, this format war was about the difference between Jack Johnson and John Jackson. If the parties involved had been smart they would simply have merged their products and saved everyone a lot of trouble.

    Oh and I don't hate MS, I just don't trust them, they got a very long history of lying to serve their own goals. Sony does the same, but I have never ever been forced to use a Sony product that was riddled with bugs. Can you say the same for MS?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Might as well ask the same in reverse by Moonpie+Madness · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, at least you're honest.

      You do realize that HD-DVD players are also Japanese, right? No? You mean bigoted morons are ignorant? Shock. Frankly, Sony competes side by side against South Korean and American electronics. It just does its best, and has no monopolies. Microsoft does not compete fairly and has serious monopolies that it exploits. We're a global economy, and Sony is a lot better for us than MS is. You are free, moron, to buy stock in Sony.

      And how are you beinf forced to buy a new blu-ray player? All blu-ray players play all blu-ray movies. Sure, you can't surf the internet or save clips on old ones. So what? This is a typical dishonest attack.

      HD-DVD is definitely the lesser of two evil. Less fun, less successful, less content, less future, less value, less alive. It's over.

    2. Re:Might as well ask the same in reverse by doctor_no · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You gotta be kidding. Sony is certainly more American then Toshiba, Sony's biggest share-holder is American (Dodge & Cox), not to mention its run by an Welsh-American CEO. By comparison, Toshiba has to be the most un-American company in existence. During the Cold War, Toshiba was found guilty of illegally selling the Soviet Union and helping build propellers for Russian nuclear submarines that could sneak past NATO's defenses, which is against the COCOM agreement that the US and Japan are both part of. Congress almost past a bill that would ban all Toshiba products being sold in the US.

      http://www.foreignaffairs.org/19871201faessay7874/george-r-packard/the-coming-u-s-japan-crisis.html

    3. Re:Might as well ask the same in reverse by terjeber · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't like being forced into buying a new player every time they want to update their specs.

      Sigh. Why is it that all these HD DVD fans are always spouting this ignorance? Before you open your bigoted mouth, why don't you try to figure out the facts of the matter? Here is some advice for you: Better to keep your mouth shut and have people think you are an idiot than to open it and remove all doubt.

      No, you don't have to get a new player to watch Blu-Ray movies in the future when the spec is updated. Your old player will work fine. It may not be able to surf the net, but you did buy the player to watch movies, right?

    4. Re:Might as well ask the same in reverse by king-manic · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh, no. HD-DVD mandates Managed Copy, completely cutting your argument to shreds.

      HD-DVD was a format that mediated between the needs of consumers and media companies. Blu-ray is designed entirely and only for media companies (what do you know - Sony also has a significant media arm...can't see any problem with that?) My original assertion still stands. He has never ripped a copy of HD DVD. Your article was from 2005, stating they wanted to support managed copy. As of yet nothing exists to do this.

      Managed Copy?
      No Managed copy now?
      Both may get Managed Copy?
      Still not here
      Managed copy? Not right now.

      basically it does not yet exist but both camps proclaim it will happen someday. I'm sure it will because the day hackers breech the protection schemes in a complete and easy to use way managed copy will be right there. Until theyn it'll be "out later this year", "soon", "out key feature we intent to implement".

      So basically you're just full of shit, but decided to add you "wisdom" regardless. Umm.. hmmm... I think someone needs to do some more research.
      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    5. Re:Might as well ask the same in reverse by terjeber · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since Microsoft is much less involved in HD-DVD than Sony is in Blu-Ray, it is not only irrationnal, but a bit uninformed, to use Microsoft practices are a main argument to judge the HD-DVD format.

      That's just funny. You are joking right? You can't be that uninformed. Microsoft is the sole reason that there is an HD DVD format. Toshiba wanted to drop this long ago but were persuaded by MS to keep it up.

      Personnally if I had to choose between both I'd choose HD-DVD for the lack of region coding and the fact they have less DRM.

      Personally I have chosen Blu-Ray to try to help end the war now. The reason is simple. MS is continuing to support this war because they want both formats to fail. If both formats fail then MS will be in a much stronger position to capture the download video on demand market with their VC-1 encoder and Media Center PCs. Do you really want Microsoft to own the entire distribution channel of your entertainment system?

      Oh, and don't tell me that MS is just as bad/good as Sony, Sony doesn't own Blu-Ray.

    6. Re:Might as well ask the same in reverse by melonman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Toshiba was found guilty of illegally selling the Soviet Union

      Wow, respect! How much did they get for it? With such incredible marketing skills, it seems all the stranger that they couldn't sell the HD-DVD format. I mean, that was legal...

      --
      Virtually serving coffee
  7. Not dead yet! by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 3, Funny

    It wants to go for a walk!

    1. Re:Not dead yet! by Mansing · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, it's...it's, ah...probably pining for the fjords.

  8. Not so fast... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As an insider I can attest to the fact that the online world has been nailed by one of the most successful viral marketing campaigns ever waged in a digital format war. An unnamed company (or three) got together before the recent announcement by Warner Bros in the weeks before CES to orchestrate this domino effect. The game plan was, in a nutshell, that Warner Bros would announce their support for Blu-Ray (even though they will continue to make HD-DVD for some time) and their subsidiaries would follow closely with announcements. Then it was revealed that Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment and Twentieth Century-Fox Home Entertainment would reaffirm their commitment to the format. This information was fed into the biggest gadget blogs with the underlying message that the war is over. This was parroted near verbatim by submissions to all of the major technology and social bookmarking sites. Major audio video forums had been primed with posters working for the viral marketing firms employed to pull this off. Overnight every major site on the internet along with mainstream media was singing the Blu-Ray song. To make sure the statistics following CES would confirm the "Blu-Ray has won" story manufacturers were heavily discounting Blu-Ray players. This week, much to no ones surprise, this came true.

    So why am I sharing this? I am firmly in the Blu-Ray camp but the techniques employed in this war have been rather unethical. Which blog or news agency will be the first to hunt down the facts in this story to confirm my story?

    Don't buy it? Then read this article on TechChrunch which describes the same techniques used to market viral videos.

    1. Re:Not so fast... by feepness · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As an insider I can attest to the fact that the online world has been nailed by one of the most successful viral marketing campaigns ever waged in a digital format war. An unnamed company (or three) got together before the recent announcement by Warner Bros in the weeks before CES to orchestrate this domino effect. I heard they also flew a missile into the Pentagon. Did you know that a real airliner couldn't have made that hole and that they stole all the tapes of the event?
    2. Re:Not so fast... by RedWizzard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whether all the press has been orchestrated or not is largely irrelevant. What is relevant is that Blu-ray has the majority of the studio support and has the higher market share. An undecided buyer would have to be pretty brave to bet on HD-DVD at this point.

    3. Re:Not so fast... by olman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except that by buying HD-DVD player you get cheap upscaling DVD player that can play HD discs as a bonus.

      Not much bravery required. It's not like the player stops working if some studio stops supporting it.

  9. Re:too bad, so sad by fastest+fascist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Next to go: Blu-Ray. Who's still going to be buying plastic discs in 5-10 years time, when a significant amount of people actually have the hardware necessary for viewing HD content?

  10. Re:netham sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Excellent! We attack at dawn!

  11. Re:too bad, so sad by BosstonesOwn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree , I would like to see content distributed on read only memory cards. I seen 32 gig cards were do out soon. Why can't we see a new format using these instead of optical discs ? Supposedly they are cheap to produce and the newer flash memories can provide enough read speed to watch movies off them. Why not a little more investment in it to make it even faster then optical discs, and completely be done with optical discs.

    But that would fail because they probably couldn't pack as much DRM on them to protect the "content".

    --
    This package Does Not Contain a Winner
  12. Re:There is another thing to consider. by mporcheron · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the UK, I recall seeing this on the Beeb (six o'clock news) and I'm pretty sure Sky news. Mainstream media may be slow but something like this is quite major.

  13. Just dreaming of Norway by Cannelloni · · Score: 3, Funny

    It not dead yet, just resting and dreaming of Norway.

    --
    Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
  14. Re:Karma-whoring suggestion by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You laugh, but HD DVD is at least a DRM optional format like DVD. Blu-ray mandates AACS - you can't press a Blu-ray disc without AACS for some reason.

    Not that any studios are putting out AACS free HD DVD discs, but the possibility is there for any company that wants to act ethically - or that just doesn't see the onerous licensing requirements as worth the money supposedly saved by using DRM.

    And yeah, I like the fact HD DVD is region free too.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  15. Re:Essentially by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Informative

    I agree both formats are probably dead, but not for the reasons you state:

    1. Pricing isn't much higher for the media, only the Blu-ray players. HD DVD players right now are the same price as "ordinary" up-converting DVD players, so there's absolutely no reason to buy the latter in place of the former, even if you think HD DVD will fail. As for media: typically HD discs (I'm using that term throughout this for both HD DVDs and Blu-ray Discs) retail for about 50% more than the equivalent DVD, despite often having better additional content and higher quality sound and video. (Note I put sound first, video in so many cases isn't noticeably higher, with some prominent exceptions.
    2. Blu-ray and HD DVD players can play DVDs, so the bottom line is that you can buy either player and buy HD discs when they're worth buying and DVDs when they're not
    3. Competition from the 'net is a factor, but right now only Apple has a device that "just works" and it's still at the teething stage. It's also rental only. Some of us like to buy discs
    4. Your last point is just untrue. An 8Gb SD card costs a minimum of $50 at the moment, compared to a dual layer DVD-R which is generally much lower than a dollar. It's going to take a decade before we see 50Gb solid state drives for the lower than a dollar price (or 500Gb drives for less than $10, if you'd prefer), whereas three layer HD DVD-Rs and two layer BD-Rs will probably come in at that price within two or three years of the recorders becoming widely available. Hey, Toshiba, if you're still serious about HD DVD, start getting those recorders out.

    Here's the more probable reason why both formats will likely fail:

    The studios are largely backing Blu-ray. That means HD DVD will likely fail unless Toshiba can get a hell of a lot of players out in the next six months.

    Blu-ray cannot succeed either. The players are expensive and unlikely to come down in price. Most of the players on shelves right now are obsolete. The only player worth getting is the PS3. The PS3 is sufficiently powerful enough that the upcoming changes to the Blu-ray spec are just a matter of updating the firmware. Many standalone Blu-ray players have no internet connectivity (required for recent Blu-ray spec changes), and nothing like enough storage capacity.

    HD DVD, interestingly, doesn't have this issue. Much of the recent revisions to Blu-ray have to do with bringing it up to spec in capabilities to HD DVD. But the studios seem to be going Blu-ray. So it doesn't matter.

    I don't think consumers are going to go for either. For Blu-ray to take off, it needs cheap players - sub-$200 before there's any chance of mass market starting to take off, with sub-$100 players to truly achieve DVD-like penetration. it certainly isn't going to work with $300-500 players that you already know you'll need to replace within the year. That'll piss people off, especially when they start playing DVDs and HD discs back to back and notice that the visual quality they paid $300 for isn't that dramatic after all. Oh, sure, 2001 and Blade Runner look awesome. But anything action based isn't, and who cares if a romantic comedy is high definition?

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  16. Black Knight by zepo1a · · Score: 4, Funny

    Blu-Ray: You fight with the strength of many men, HD-DVD. [Slashes HD-DVD's arm off]
    HD-DVD: 'Tis but a scratch.
    Blu-Ray: A scratch? Your arm's off!
    HD-DVD: No, it isn't.
    BLU-RAY: Victory is mine! We thank Thee Lord, that in Thy mer--
    HD-DVD: Hah! [kick] Come on, then. Have at you!

    1. Re:Black Knight by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Funny

      And I, on the other hand, invoke Godwin.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  17. The war is over. by foxtrot · · Score: 3, Funny

    You can talk about sales rates or attach rates or how much shelf space is dedicated to blue boxes as opposed to red boxes, you can talk about technical merit or political merit, you can talk about studios committing to or being bought out by one side or another. You can talk about all number of things, but I know the war is over.

    Blu-ray wins. I know this to be true.

    I know this because sitting on the shelf underneath my teevee is a Toshiba HD-A3.

  18. Re:This is getting absurd by king-manic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People like to complain that Warner stabbed HDDVD folks in the back, but this is a true stab in the back.

    These guys know it's over and are trying to squeeze the last few bucks out of this things before it's all over, so they put out crap like this to get a few suckers.

    It's bad for the industry, for their partners (except Microsoft), for the consumer, to let this format war last any longer, and it's over, so let's move on.

    These folks are starting to embarrass themselves. I agree that HD DVD is dead. However NPD is just a market research firm. They just want to clarify that 1 week of data is nto enought o draw conclusions from. Which is a fair comment.
    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  19. Futureproof the discs by Xian97 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    HD DVD has the ability to press a DVD and HD DVD on a disc. I would start including the HD DVD version on every standard DVD. Anyone that doesn't have an HDTV but is planning on getting one sometime in the future can still continue to build their DVD collection, and then enjoy them in HD when they upgrade. That will also provide an incentive to upgrade.

    There are still a lot of people out there that do not have the equipment to play either Blu-Ray or HD DVD. Since I work in the tech field, most of my coworkers do, but there are only two of us in my neighborhood that have HDTV. I am the only one in my immediate family that has HDTV as well. Not having to worry about your DVD collection being obsolete by having the HD DVD version as well would be a good selling point.

  20. Brave? No. Intrigued by high def? Yes. by Xest · · Score: 2, Informative

    "An undecided buyer would have to be pretty brave to bet on HD-DVD at this point."

    Why is that? You can get an HD-DVD player now with 7 films for the same price as 7 bluray films without a player here in the UK. The Bluray player costs an extra £250 on top so that's a pretty big difference for now. Even if HD-DVDs stop being produced you've still got 7 high def films and a nice upscaling DVD player.

    Even if HD-DVD is dead, the current deal on Toshiba's low end player is hard to argue against because you don't actually lose anything by going for the offer, but you gain arguably the cheapest entry option into true HD content.

    It's one of those things you can buy if you're interested in high def and win or lose, it doesn't really matter. Even when the system eventually dies if HD-DVD is gone then you'll have still got a nice life out of it and the free DVDs will be cheap enough to re-buy in another format for a couple of £ or so if you liked them enough. It'll probably also be enough to keep you going until Bluray drives become more reasonably priced even if you rent movies.

    Essentially the current cost of Toshiba's HD-DVD drive and the free HD-DVDs can act as a no-risk bridge for those wanting high-def content but not being willing to buy a Bluray drive right now.