Slashdot Mirror


Leaked Government Doc Reveals UK ID "Coercion" Plans

BoingBoing is relating a hair-raising tale from the UK anti-ID-register group 'NO2ID' that claims to have a leaked government document [PDF] detailing how the UK government plans to "coerce" citizens into a national ID register. "UK campaigners NO2ID this morning enlisted the help of bloggers across the world to spread a leaked government document describing how the British government intends to go about "coercing" its citizens onto a National Identity Register. The 'ID card' is revealed as little more than a cover to create a official dossier and trackable ID for every UK resident - creating what NO2ID calls 'the database state'."

37 of 187 comments (clear)

  1. 24 years behind schedule... by contraba55 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Big Brother was British, wasn't he?

    1. Re:24 years behind schedule... by cybereal · · Score: 5, Informative

      Winston, the main character, lived within view of the headquarters of The Party of Oceania which would presumably house Big Brother if he actually existed. The location was called Airstrip One, which according to Winston, used to be known as London.

      Big Brother was British.

      --
      I read the script, and I think it would help my character's motivation if he was on fire. -Bender
    2. Re:24 years behind schedule... by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Winston lived within sight of the Ministry of Truth, where he worked, not the Party headquarters. In fact it wasn't clear whether there even was a headquarters, but most of the Inner Party members lived in West London and the headquarters could easily have been in America for that matter. Airstrip One used to be known as Great Britain (i.e., the whole island), not London. London was still called London in Winston's time, and he speculated that it had probably been called that for a long time.

      The novel features a nursery rhyme called Oranges and Lemons that I believe ends like this:

      Here comes a National ID to light you to bed ... And here comes a chopper to chop off your head.

    3. Re:24 years behind schedule... by fishbowl · · Score: 3, Informative


      >Big Brother was British.

      As was Orwell, who was satirizing his contemporary view of British society and government by framing it into a dystopian futuristic novel. But the situation that provoked him to write 1984 was his Labour party job that required him to participate in blacklisting people suspected of being communists. It turns out the real "Big Brother" actually *was* watching his every move and keeping detailed records, and that he really did have to write blatant fabrications on behalf of the government.

      Keep in mind while reading 1984.... Orwell (Blair) was an informant for the government, exposing dangerous communists like Charlie Chaplin and John Steinbeck.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  2. Ironically.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In shades of 1984 , the report came from a new UK government agency called the Ministry of Privacy.

    1. Re:Ironically.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Informative
      "The 'ID card' is revealed as little more than a cover to create a official dossier and trackable ID for every UK resident - creating what NO2ID calls 'the database state'."

      Hmm...sounds quite reminiscent of the US's upcoming version...the RealID act. In our case, they're just calling them drivers licenses....but, if you don't drive, you still need an ID that fits in with the RealID act. So, it really is a national ID, hooked to a national, govt. database.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  3. Might be advantageous... by KublaiKhan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perfect opportunity to set up a few convenient aliases--with all the work that they'll be getting, the folks registering will likely not pay quite as much attention as they ought to new registrants. Voila, government-approved IDs, guaranteed to pass any test for fakes.

    Of course, getting past the initial screening may not be trivial--but investigation into that avenue may be worthwhile.

    --
    In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
    A stately pleasure dome decree
  4. Broken link by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Informative

    Boingboing appears to be down; I get "connection reset." Here's the NO2ID group's homepage. Relevant searches on Google/Google News will probably turn up more information of interest than Boing Boing's shoot-from-the-hip sensationalism, anyway.

  5. Do it the easy way. by khasim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since these ID's will be "official" for just about anything ...

    Find someone involved in issuing them who has a gambling / drug / sex / whatever problem who can be bought / blackmailed.

    The whole system breaks down when it depends upon the honesty of people.

    1. Re:Do it the easy way. by Yaa+101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This system shows that the ruling class is paranoid to the bone, I think it stems from the amount of poor people they see as potential threat to their pitiful life.

      They outright want to go back to the middle age serfdoms where people are owned, they see the 20th century as a nasty period when almost all would have went wrong for them.

      Being bribe able is a work prescription you need to have to be able to do certain jobs like being a politician, no honest person is able to do that job, being non bribe able makes you too expensive for the system that rely on low payments and big dossiers of all mishaps of politicians.

      The whole system breaks down due to dishonesty within their treacherous class where everybody is paranoid and nobody trust each other.

    2. Re:Do it the easy way. by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sure I agree that the ruling class is entirely at fault here. I'd lay the blame squarely on the large middle class who are often all too willing to trade away their freedom for additional security. It seems to be a tendency of human nature to value something less when no effort was expended in obtaining it. Many of us are fortunate enough to live in a time and place where our freedom has been paid for by the blood of others, but the unfortunate result of this may be that we can never truly understand the value of freedom until it's taken away again.

      Make no mistake - politicians can only get away with this because not enough average citizens care (although the fact that a stink is being made over this is encouraging). They simply promise more handouts to various constituencies, and all it costs is more and more of your money and your freedom.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    3. Re:Do it the easy way. by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny you wrote that. I actually added 'perceived' after I had written the line, but then deleted it again. Here's why: I actually believe that removing freedoms can, in fact, actually increase security in some situations. The old Soviet Russia (sorry, cue the jokes...), from what I've heard, was a pretty secure place in many ways. Not so much freedom, though. The old American wild west was a dangerous place, but a libertarian paradise.

      I'll grant you that many policies don't do a damned thing while chewing up personal freedom, though, so your point is certainly valid.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  6. boycotting people with ID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the problems when we have ID cards is that some people are going to break solidarity with the rest of us by getting one and it will be arranged that they get benefits from it. I wonder if we could have a campaign where we ask people for ID and refuse to serve or help them if they show national ID cards. It would have to start with a gentle campaign where they are just given some information and told not to show their ID card again, but after that it could be quite effective. Can this be done without alienating people? It would definitely be worth it. Something to change the equation so that the kind of people who refuse to think beyond their next fish supper can see a benefit from refusing ID.

  7. NO worries by techpawn · · Score: 4, Funny

    The database will be written in MSAccess and kept on someones hard drive until it crashes.

    --
    Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
    1. Re:NO worries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, no. It will be in an Excel file pasted into a PowerPoint presentation left on some nobs thumb drive which gets lost in the snow. Some homeless vet will find it and think it's a whistle and keep it in the crotch of his underwear. If that's not security through obscurity, I don't know what is.

    2. Re:NO worries by ah.clem · · Score: 2, Informative

      Clatto Verata N... Necktie... Nickel... It's an "N" word, it's definitely an "N" word!

      OK, I'm not always the sharpest pencil in the packet protector, but were you meaning "klaatu barada nikto"? If so, I get the joke, but the spelling is not quite right...

      ah.clem

      --
      "Life is not magic." Dr. Ron Weiss - "If we don't play God, who will?" Dr. James Watson
  8. Coercion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is "coercion" in quotes? Coercion is the business of government. Government is, after all, the organization holding a monopoly on the special right to employ coercion as a business model. Coercion is what defines government.

    Put it this way: If the people actually volunteered to hand over their money and follow the aribtrary rules set forth by a central committee, then government would be entirely redundant. The reason why government exists is precisely because the people would not voluntarily hand over their money and follow that arbitrary set of rules.

    Again, coercion is the fundamental tool which all governments MUST hold -- otherwise it ain't government.

    1. Re:Coercion by exploder · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why is "coercion" in quotes? I'm gonna go out on a limb here... ...because it's a quote?

      --
      Yo dawg, I heard you like the Ackermann function, so OH GOD OH GOD OH GOD
    2. Re:Coercion by HalAtWork · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or... government officials could be paid the minimum wage that they themselves dictate, be excluded of all gifts and other monies, and constantly audited watched and surveyed by the public (with those little traffic cameras set up in every room, hey they're good enough for us), guaranteeing those who get the job really want it and does a really good job.

    3. Re:Coercion by n6kuy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nothing fluffy is scary!

      But I would be wary of "fluffy" puppies.

      --
      If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
    4. Re:Coercion by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      for example, by making you produce your ID card when you get a job, so everyone is forced to either "volunteer" for a card, or else be unemployed.

      Will you be allowed to sign on if you are unable to get a job because you don't have an ID card?

  9. Re:The gestapo are quick these days by Zarquon42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, I am sure that the "gestapo" took the site down because they don't want anybody to see it...it couldn't possibly be that the pdf that was linked to was several MB, and there are a lot of people trying to get to it.

  10. Re:Missing authorship information by Bogtha · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's a noticeable lack of authorship details.

    I take it back, the IPS are responsible for this, I just didn't spot it because it was written in the third-person.

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  11. Who cares? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the British Government we're talking about. They have shown themselves, time and time again, to be completely incapable of completing any IT project. Every time they try, they award the contract to EDS, it goes horrendously over-budget and ends up being cancelled. Expect the big brother database to go online some time around 2050, only be able to store first names, and crash losing all data the first time someone tries to run a query.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:Who cares? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I suspect that you're right, but that doesn't mean that we're out of the woods on this one yet. Firstly, and most simply, is the fact that I can think of far better ways of spending billions of pounds than this. Secondly is that (as we have seen with no-fly lists) just because a database is inaccurate, it doesn't mean it'll be enough to put those in charge off using it for important and even life-changing work. Thirdly, as we have so recently seen, government agencies seem largely incapable of securing the data the they do hold.

      I don't see the ID card project being the pervasive tool that the government seem to be hoping for, but I'm sure it's going to cause a lot of problems along the way.

  12. Re:Might be adventageous by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2, Funny
    I'd LOVE to have a 'database society' ...

    Be careful what you ask for; the Government will probably choose MS SQL Server... DOH! :-)

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  13. You will get fooled again. by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You think a revolution is going to help? Replacing one government with another is only a temporary reprieve. Once the generation that dragged the last batch of tyrants to the guillotine dies off, people will forget what happened and grow complacent. They'll go back to saying "there ought to be a law" every time something doesn't go the way they think it should, and a new bunch of tyrants will corrupt the new government. Every revolution, even the American revolution of 1776, is a case of "Meet the New Boss, same as the Old Boss".

    Go ahead and have your revolution. Found a new government on the ashes of the old. Swear in a new parliament while the heads of the old rot on pikes. It won't help you for long. You will get fooled again.

  14. Re:Hmm by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Informative
    "Well I'm already trackable as an individual through my social security number. How is this any worse than that?"

    Well, at this point, you don't have to give out your SS number, or have it scanned for travelling by airplane. Or soon...to be scanned when buying booze, or entering a bar...or maybe after that, for any CC transaction to validate identity.

    You aren't forced to carry it with you at all times, and have that number associated with many actions you take today in every day life. It can't really be used to trace you to a very fine grained detail....yet.

    It doesn't have an RFID chip in it (like our passports have now) that might could be used to track your physical movements during the day by scanners set up who knows where...

    Unless you are careless and give it to anyone party not concerned with SS taxable income...you can't really be tracked that badly as of now with just an SS. Now...if you give it out willy-nilly to anyone asking for it for their database (instead of refusing to give it out)...well, you might be tracked better than I currently am by it.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  15. This is why we NEED the ID program by vancondo · · Score: 4, Funny

    You See! This is exactly why we need a comprehensive government ID system. Then we'd KNOW who wrote that report. I can't wait until we can all just sit around tracking each other, then we'll finally all be happy and safe!

    http://vancouvercondo.info

    --
    -
  16. Awesome by hermit_tries_virtual · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After reading the PDF (I know it is against /. rules...) I have two questions:

    1. Where can I sign up for the US version

    2. Can the US integrate out system into theirs??? That would only help to protect us all!!!

    I mean, after all, I am looking for all of the following:

    1. I want to know that I have the right to be here

    2. I want to know who you "really" are

    3. I want to join a service that meet my needs

    4. I want to be able to prove who I am

    P.S. I want to point out my sarcasm, as my last few posts like this labeled me as a troll. Also, it is pointless to resist. Most everyone I know is willing to voluntarily sign up for department and grocery store "point cards" to save ~%5.....

    Heck, after 9/11, most people I knew said they were willing to give up thier civil rights in order to protect us from the terrorists... even if they did not know what those rights were...

  17. Holding the government at gunpoint. by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I agree with you concerning the Framers' reasons for including the Second Amendment. However, I have to ask you why you think that simply overthrowing an oppressive government and replacing it will do any long-term good? Do you think that leading Congress to the guillotine will work in a country where most people, thanks to public education, think that consistent respect for individual rights means leaving poor people to starve to death in the streets?

    The American revolution was as successful as it was because of the people behind it, and I'm not just talking about the heroes you read about in school. Just about everybody in the colonies had at least a nodding acquaintance with the ideas of thinkers like John Locke and Thomas Paine.

    An armed rebellion today would fail miserably, because most of the people are beholden to the government. They either get money directly from the government, or they work in industries that receive government subsidies. Do you think, for example, that public school teachers will do anything but teach the children in their ever-so-tender care that the rebels are anything but villains?

    Before you can have a revolution, you need a people on fire with the lust for liberty. We don't have that, for the most part. Most people, if you were to tell them that it was possible to have a government that did not rob Peter in order to provide Paul with a welfare check, would laugh at you. Suggest repealing the income tax, and the first thing you'll hear is "how will the government replace those 'lost revenues', as if the government was ever morally entitled to that money in the first place.

    A revolution won't work right now. The people are not ready; they do not burn with a passionate need for freedom.

  18. Re:Might be adventageous by element-o.p. · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that the problem both in UK and in US is that people don't truest their government. I don't know if this is because of history of wrong doing in part of the government, or because of television and movies...

    Unfortunately, I think that in the U.S. at least, most people *do* trust the government. I don't, and a lot of people here on /. don't, but I think that is more because history has shown again and again that governments that are not kept in check by their constituents tend to become abusive. In fact, the relative freedom that western societies have enjoyed for the last several generations are an historical aberration; one that I *don't* want to see corrected.
    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  19. Re:Missing authorship information by Daimanta · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is Slashdot, you can't take your opinion back! You flame your way out of trouble!

    Asshole!

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
  20. Was the pithy commentary really necessary? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Honestly, I think we all have the necessary reading comprehension to see what the document is driving at. I don't need some ridiculous side commentary, which is wholly devoid of any useful insight, to help me understand the content of the document.

    Frankly, the commentary sounds like the rantings of some extremist, conspiracy-theorist wanker, and does nothing but muddy the issues, not to mention make reading the document more difficult, as I have to wade through their irritating scribblings.

  21. Re:Hmm by thsths · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > Well, at this point, you don't have to give out your SS number, or have it scanned for travelling by airplane. Or soon...to be scanned when buying booze, or entering a bar...or maybe after that, for any CC transaction to validate identity.

    Since you say social security number, I assume that you are an American citizen. You do know what the USA do with every foreigner entering the country, I assume? Taking 10 (!) fingerprints! Plus a scan of your passport, storing your credit card number, plus any other information in a related computer system. This gives the "land of freedom" quite a new interpretation.

  22. Re:Might be adventageous by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think that the problem both in UK and in US is that people don't truest their government. I don't know if this is because of history of wrong doing in part of the government, or because of television and movies people automatically assume that anything new or something that makes governing efficient is an grand scale conspiracy to enslave the nation. My personal feeling is that democracy scales poorly, or at least not very smoothly, particularly in diverse populations. Democracy is predicated on the idea of compromise; of people finding a solution that works for everyone involved. If you have too many groups with radically different ideas of how the government should be run, to the point where a compromise between them can't be found, you start to get disenfranchisement and mistrust when "your" people aren't in power. The U.S. has throughout most of its history stretched the idea of democracy and compromise a long way; in some cases beyond the point where violence has been required to keep it together. Even today, there are not-insignificant voting blocs in the U.S. whose idea of optimal government would look like Iran with crucifixes (and who themselves have their own bugaboos -- "communists," "socialists," "abortionists," &c.); the trust you place in government today could be empowering your oppressors tomorrow.

    There isn't enough common ground in the U.S. for everyone, or perhaps even a majority, to trust their government in the way that (based on your comment) people in Finland do. Putting that much trust in a democratic government requires that you put lots of trust into your fellow voters and in the people who run for office, and American voters, by and large, are too distrustful and too cynical to do that.

    And on the whole, I think that's a good thing.
    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  23. Big Brother's biggest backer by byrdfl3w · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I guess it's going to be slightly more difficult to sneakily download MP3's once your details, signature, thumb print and threat assessment are linked to your ISP/IP address, then sold to the RIAA and the BPI...