Slashdot Mirror


Do Not Call Registry Set to Become Permanent

coondoggie passed us a NetworkWorld article about an initiative by the Senate to transform the Do Not Call list into a permanent institution. Originally individuals on the list were to have their place on the list revoked; up to a third of the people who signed up might have fallen off the list by the Autumn without renewing legislation. A move by the Senate this past Wednesday will permanently prevent salesmen from calling those who have registered for the list. "Aside from what telemarketing junk the bill does prevent, experts note what may also be a big deal is a provision that is NOT in this bill and that is protection for those other annoying time wasters: political robo calls."

33 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. Finally.... by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My congresscritters are finally doing something I approve of!

    1. Re:Finally.... by gnick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes - But good luck persuading your "congresscritters" to add "political robo calls" to the list.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    2. Re:Finally.... by mrxak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I assume other non-profit organizations will also be let through too.

    3. Re:Finally.... by internetcommie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      After I put my number on the do-not-call list, I actually got more calls. Some of the callers even go out of their way to tell me that since they are politicians, charitable organizations or what have you, they are exempt. Some even before I say I don't want to be called. I'm guessing this means they are using the list as a calling list, assuming us who aren't wasting our money on telemarketing scams must have some left over for their good cause. I hang up just the same.

    4. Re:Finally.... by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes - But good luck persuading your "congresscritters" to add "political robo calls" to the list.

      You misread the summary. The previous version of the legislation authorizing the DNC registry provided an exemption for non-profits, political calls, and surveys. The new one does not, so in effect, by not providing that exemption in this version, they did add those calls to the list of banned solicitation.

      My feet are suddenly very cold. I think hell just became endothermic and is well on its way to a state transition.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    5. Re:Finally.... by reddburn · · Score: 5, Informative

      I worked at one of these places for a week (I had to leave before I killed myself), and actually, they get your name from public records and donor lists. If you've donated to a political campaign online, signed a petition, joined an e-mail list, even visited a political website with the right cookies (the first sophisticated tracking cookies were - according to R.N. Howard in New Media Campaigns - used by the RNC website in the 90s) in the past 9 years, your contact info is automatically added to that party's, candidate's, organization's (the RCCC, DCCC, moveon.org) list of people to harass on the phone.

      If you tell them no, if you tell them anything *other* than to specifically "Remove me from your list," ("don't call again" doesn't work) they can legally call back in 90 days (6 mos. if you donate, and then they ask for 2x what you gave before as the start). Worse: you have to be the individual they're calling. If it's a spouse, the autodialer will call back the next day. The organization you donate to is paying these companies by the call, and the company also gets a percentage (right off the top) of your donation. Someone donates $50, the organization ends up with about $35 after all is said and done.

      --
      "Those who believe in telekinetics, raise my hand" - Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
    6. Re:Finally.... by psychicsword · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am going to guess that someone got a hold of every senator and congressman's phone number and created a survey to call them during dinner and to simply ask "Do calls during dinner annoy you?"...

      Family Feud host:"and the survey says [ding ding ding] 100% said yes!"

    7. Re:Finally.... by tm2b · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't hold your breath. The First Amendment issues are much stickier around non-commercial speech, especially political speech.

      No, I don't happen to believe that they apply to people using my own equipment and my own paid service to harass me either, but those arguments can and will be made.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
  2. How about a do not mail list? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can just hang up on a phone call. I find junk mail to be far more annoying & damaging to the environment.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:How about a do not mail list? by milsoRgen · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can just hang up on a phone call.
      Or not answer it all... I realized long ago just because some contraption starts making noise, nothing is forcing me to address it. Same with the front door and annoying friends, just because they can make some noise by hitting their meat clubs against some wood, doesn't mean I'm forced to get out of my E-Z chair...
      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    2. Re:How about a do not mail list? by Bryansix · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree. You have to actually pay to get off of some mailing lists now. The law should allow a single repository where you can request to not get any junk mail except from companies you already are doing business with and even then only when you opt-in. And no, affiliates of businesses you do business with DON'T count.

    3. Re:How about a do not mail list? by BigJClark · · Score: 2, Interesting


      I went one further.

      I received a call from a politician running for mayor or some jazz, an automated type. I patiently listened to this spiel, did a google lookup for his business number, called him and left HIM a message stating:

      "Dear Sir, I have called to inform you that I am not voting for you, not because of your stand on certain positions, but because you have resorted to an automatic phone dialer. I will also recommend my friends, acquaintances, and co-workers do the same. Good day."

      Special note: I would not do it for any other sales pitch, as then they would know "I was there".

      --

      Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
    4. Re:How about a do not mail list? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or not answer it all...

      Exactly. We have trained all of our family, friends, etc., to start talking when the answering machine engages.

      We do not answer the phone at all before this unless we're expecting a call at a specific time. We may pick up the phone if we want to talk at that time; otherwise we'll call 'em back.

      When we lived in a newly-built house, we were always getting the little entrepreneurs (selling gas logs, house numbers painted on the curb, front yard gas lamps, etc.) banging on the door or ringing the doorbell in the middle of the day. Those would go unanswered, too.

      --
      Yeah, right.
    5. Re:How about a do not mail list? by Sabz5150 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I realized long ago just because some contraption starts making noise, nothing is forcing me to address it. Get married. Watch that change.
      --
      "Who modded this informative? Whoever it is must've been smokin' some of that martian pot!"
    6. Re:How about a do not mail list? by vux984 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It forces me to take action- to look, or to shut the phone up from reminding me of a missed call or junk voicemail.

      No. That's your crappy ass phone.

      It *should* feature call management features to allow you to do stuff like:

      I only want the missed call notifier to beep if:
        a) its my wife or immediate family
        b) the emergency number from the alarm company
        c) its someone in my address book between 9 and 5
        d) unless its -that guy- in which case don't ever beep. Hell don't even ring.
      otherwise, if I miss the call, don't beep, ill see the notification when i check the phone.

      Me, I want the missed call beeps during the day. But after 5pm, no. After midnight... HELL NO.

      Similiarly I should be able to set ring rules in the same way.

      Why don't we have features like this? I can say that my Primus VOIP service actually does... but why not my cellphone? My only theory is that the network desperately wants me to use my phone... although since I have unlimited incoming calls on my package, really, better screening would save them money. Not me.

      Instead what do we get? The ability to assign different ring tones (purchased at $3+/each) to different contacts. Hurrah. Just another indicator of how fucked up it is to have the device provided by the network.

      Its always: "What can the phone do to make you consume more services?" Instead of "What does the consumer actually want?"

    7. Re:How about a do not mail list? by rewinn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some have claimed that at least some robo calls are specifically designed to discourage you from voting, either by annoying you or by giving misleading conversation.

    8. Re:How about a do not mail list? by vtscott · · Score: 2, Informative
      The junkmail thing is definitely a pet peeve of mine, and it bothers me more than the telemarketing as well. At the last place I lived, we got junkmail from comcast about their internet service and comcast didn't even service our apartment complex. WTF? Where I live now I can't even remember the last day I went to the mailbox and there wasn't junk there. We recycle what we can, but I can't imagine how many trees die to bring us pizza coupons. And those trees would come in handy to offset the carbon emissions created when carting around that extra mail in the back of a mail truck... From wikipedia:

      * Each year, 100 million trees are used to produce junk mail. * 250,000 homes could be heated with one day's supply of junk mail. * Americans receive almost 4 million tons of junk mail every year. [3] * The yearly production and disposal of junk mail consumes more energy than 2.8 million cars.


      But it's big business for the postal service, which is why it stays. Again from wikipedia:

      In the United States, the United States Postal Service maintains that direct marketers pay the majority of the costs of mail. Bulk mail thereby subsidizes low cost stamps for letter, magazine, and book mailing.


      So the difference is that telemarketers aren't as lucrative for phone companies as spammers are for the postal service. Which is why it's much harder to stop the junkmail.

  3. Does it matter? by overshoot · · Score: 2, Informative
    The telemarketers have had the time now to engineer systems around the loopholes built into the law, so that we're pretty much back where we were before.

    Don't think so? How many prosecutions have there been under the law in the last year?

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  4. Ehh by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about no robo-calls PERIOD?

    Do you know they leave messags on your answering machine now?

    I was sitting here, minding my own business.. phone rings, 1-800 number..no way i'm picking that up.

    So my machine gets it, to my horrow i suddenly hear a text-book RADIO AD blaring through my answeing machine!

    HI THIS IS GOTTSCHALKS BLQAGH BLAH BLAH in my own #($&*%& house, an ad! NO TV, NO RADIO!

    I immediately threw my empty beer bottle at the blast machine, I'm getting answering service through the phone company now!

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
  5. Caller ID is your friend by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Caller ID along with an answering machine is a great combination. My home phone/answering machin also lets me set up custom ring tones for numbers in its address list. If a family member of friend calls I hear one type of ring so I always answer it. If the Caller ID says something like "blocked" or "unknown" or shows a phone number like 000-000-0000 then I just let my answering machine pick it up. It sure saves me a lot of hassle.

  6. A better solution... by mangu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or not answer it all...

    I answer the phone and tell them "yes, just hold on a second". Then I leave the phone on the table, wondering how long will it take them to hang up this time.
    1. Re:A better solution... by milsoRgen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thats a good idea, sometimes when I'm feeling froggy I'll answer 'em and say the most disturbing things that can come to mind... Some hang up, but every once in a while someone will just try and play it off and continue the discourse... F'ing hilarious.

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    2. Re:A better solution... by calebt3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or you could drag it out as long as possible... http://www.ahajokes.com/off06.html

  7. What happens when numbers are reassigned? by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What happens to the status of the number when someone discontinues usage of the telephone number, say by moving or canceling your service and moving to VoIP? IF the number is then at some point reassigned to another person, does that number remain on the Do-Not-Call list? If it does, is that legitimate, as an individual can only vouch for their own phone numbers, and not that of a third-party?

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
    1. Re:What happens when numbers are reassigned? by WK2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When the number is de-activated or moved by the phone company, your name and number and come off the list. I guess the phone company notifies the FTC, or something like that.

      See http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/alerts/alt107.shtm for more info. Note that the fucktards at the FTC refer to people as "consumers," despite the fact that a person is probably registering on the Do Not Call list because they aren't consumers.

      --
      Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
  8. Telemarketers for Non-Profits by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now we need to do something about the telemarketing firms calling "on behalf" of non-profit organizations. This is still legal under the law (it seemed like a good idea: who doesn't love non-profits?), but it's being abused. The telemarketing companies keep an extraordinary fraction of the donations (over 50%, from what a local newspaper investigation found) so little of your money goes to the organization you're trying to help.

    One obvious solution is to only allow the non-profit exemption if more than, say, 90% of the donation goes right to the actual non-profit. That'll probably shut up the telemarketers because profit would no longer cover costs.

  9. Political Calls are No Big Deal, Junk Mail Worse by Maltheus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The occasional person polling me for my opinions doesn't bother me at all. It's simple enough to hang up if I don't want to bother. But in the days before the Do Not Call List, I'd hardly ever bothered answering my phone if it got bad.

    Junk mail is far worse, IMO. You still have to sort through it to make sure you're not throwing anything important out. It usually just ends up turning my house into a mess because I don't have the time to deal with it all. At the very least, they could put those newspaper adverts in a bag or something. It's too easy to get that crap mixed in with real mail. I don't want anything that doesn't have my name on it (resident mailings), nor do I want credit card offers that can fuck me up if I don't dispose of them properly. I wish I could direct a private company to deliver my mail that won't having a problem stripping this stuff out for me.

  10. mail pref. service didn't help me by mbius · · Score: 3, Funny

    They've had my dollar a few years now, and my mailbox hasn't seen any difference.

    Just this morning I was pondering an amazing coupon for two $0.79 Taco Bell tacos for only $1.59. Or ten for $7.99!

    --
    you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
    Prime UID Club
  11. Re:Isn't stopping all calls by DanQuixote · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Here is an effective (though laborious) way to deal with that.

    1. Register on National Do-Not-Call list.
    2. Wait 3 month beginning period.
    3. Get caller ID.
    4. Wait for another call.
    5. Be pleasant to the person, if you can order something cheap, say $10, do it.
    6. Get their address and phone number as you place the order.
    7. Photograph the Caller ID display as evidence.
    8. Take good notes including date, time, person talked to, company name, as more evidence.
    9. Copy the bill you receive for $10 as conclusive evidence of marketing intent.
    10. Go to your county courthouse, lodge a small claim for $500 for a telemarketing violation.
    11. Send them proper notice they are being sued.
    12. Since they are often out of state, they won't show and you get default judgment.
    13. If they do show, you have proof of listing, notice, call, and call purpose.
    14. For bonus dollars, ($500 per item) look into whether they have, train to, practice and publish upon demand the required company calling policies.
    15. Profit!!!

    I've tried it, it works.

    --
    "We think people rightly feel that once they buy something, it stays bought," --Suw Charman, Open Rights Grp
  12. The new telemarketers by Ender77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The new telemarketers get around the do not call list by claiming they are taking surveys for products. I have been getting more and more calls for surveys lately for this or that product. I ask to be taken off the call list but they just say they are not telemarketers and ignore the request.

  13. Re:I just wish... by Hatta · · Score: 2, Funny

    My wife doesn't like... saying no,

    Tell me something I don't know.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  14. Re:Finally.... but not enough by TakeyMcTaker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I still wont be happy until Opt-Out becomes the default, just like it should be with any other form of SPAM. Communications like this should all be Opt-In only, and only then if specifically subscribed per list type. All these contracts that say "we do business with you now, so our subsidiaries and 'partners' all get to SPAM you now, unless you go over there and print this form and sign and snail-mail it" are the default now, and they all stink.

  15. Re:Might not be constitutional by TakeyMcTaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The concept that corporations have ANY "rights", including free speech, is completely ludicrous. Corporations don't really die (even when they go out of business, their brand sometimes gets picked up, like Atari), and they have no sense of consequence unless regulations force them to. The activist Conservative judges gave corporations some of the same "rights" as people, through a grave misunderstanding of the term "people" in the Constitution, because apparently Conservatives think corporations are more important than actual living, breathing PEOPLE. You know, the new type of hairless talking monkeys. That kind of people!

    Apart from that, "freedom of speech" has nothing to do with your ability to call my phone, send mail to my mail box, or e-mail me. Those communication methods all terminate on MY PROPERTY, and my property rights trump your "speech" rights any day. You can stand and yell at me all you want, but if you do it on my lawn, I can call the cops and have them drag you away, and no activist Conservative judges can change that. If they do, I'll just use my "right to bear arms" and shoot you. ;) I may even try that with the corporations SPAMMING me too, but they are so much bigger of a target, the ammo may be cost prohibitive.