Slashdot Mirror


Deal Reportedly Reached In Writers' Strike

BlueshiftVFX writes to let us know that the writers' strike may be over. CNBC and other media are quoting former Disney CEO Michael Eisner: "It's over. They made the deal, they shook hands on the deal. It's going on Saturday to the writers in general... A deal has been made, and they'll be back to work very soon."

69 of 333 comments (clear)

  1. I guess... by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess this means the Colbert/Stewart/O'Brien fued has been resolved, too...

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:I guess... by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I guess now the shows can go back to the same tired old bits they were rehashing before the strike forced them to get creative for the first time in years. -sigh-

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:I guess... by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, some of them. The good news is that they can take some of the programs that were suspended due to the Writer's Strike, like Bionic Woman and Journeyman, and go ahead and cancel them.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:I guess... by zenkonami · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, I think this past decade has been one of the most creative decades for Television since the medium began. Anywhere from BSG, The Sopranos and 30 Rock to Lost, The Office and Heroes. And let's not forget Firefly.

      Now are the geeks happy?

      --

      Do You Experiment?
    4. Re:I guess... by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe I should apply for a writing job at the Daily Show.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:I guess... by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've actually been rather impressed with some of the new TV programming over the past few years. Also remember that 99% of anything is crap (and that includes reality shows)

      Lost is far from formulaic and repetitive, although the writers have been taking it a bit too far, and need to start winding down the series (ideally in one or two seasons, rather than the proposed three). I lost track halfway through the second season, so I can't comment on how it's been recently.

      Heroes is one of the most popular shows today, and has terrific nerd-appeal. The current season has been somewhat subpar, but the original series was engaging and enjoyable.

      Battlestar Galactica is easily the best-written and produced Sci-Fi series to air in years. It's also quite a bit more palatable for normal audiences.

      24 is the best 80s action movie ever made. Although I don't particularly agree with its politics, it's quite an engaging storyline.

      House is quite good. Perhaps becoming a bit repetitive, but definitely the best of the "medical" shows.

      Mythbusters? How can you read slashdot and not love mythbusters, even in spite of their disregard for the scientific method?

      The Daily Show and Colbert Report singlehandedly got an apathetic generation interested in politics. That's no small feat.

      Over in the UK, they've got Top Gear, The Mighty Boosh, the current incarnation of Dr Who, along with a fantastic array of other programming that doesn't make it to the US -- Thanks to advances in filmmaking technology, their documentaries and nature series are also absolutely captivating to watch.

      (After writing this post, I feel the need to assert that I'm not a couch potato! The magic of TiVo lets me save the good stuff for saturday nights.)

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    6. Re:I guess... by glwtta · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bionic Woman could not have possibly been affected by the strike - there is no way that someone was getting paid for writing that.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    7. Re:I guess... by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Funny
      I like all those shows, but, I gotta admit, I miss seeing Jennifer Aniston weekly, bra-less in tight shirts/sweaters.....

      We need more shows like that on the air again.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:I guess... by rkanodia · · Score: 3, Funny

      Every time 24 goes over the top, you find out that it was just a local maximum.

  2. Terms? by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With no linked article and no information in the summary, I'm curious if the writers got their Internet distribution royalties after all?

  3. Re:This is news for nerds... by rainmayun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... because many nerds watch tv.

  4. Seems like noone won by TheBiGW · · Score: 2, Insightful

    'As a result of studio cutbacks, however, many of the writers who went on strike are unlikely to return to the same big-money contracts they'd had as individuals with the studios.' It seems like no-one won from these strikes. TV companies take write downs, writers are not paid as well as they were, everyone looses.

    --
    Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for an hour. Set him on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Seems like noone won by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      'As a result of studio cutbacks, however, many of the writers who went on strike are unlikely to return to the same big-money contracts they'd had as individuals with the studios.'

      That sounds a lot to me like "We fired these guys for supporting the union, but we can't say that because that would get us in trouble with the NLRB."

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:Seems like noone won by Sancho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The studios weren't making as much money due to the strike. It's pretty reasonable for them to cut back on the budget. Now that the writers are willing to write again, they get to deal with the budget.

      I was pulling for the writers from the beginning, but we can't pretend that money just grows on trees like the government likes to think.

  5. Too late? by n0dna · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've nearly forgotten which couple of shows even held my attention.

  6. Original story link by TheBiGW · · Score: 5, Informative

    This seems to be missing so here it is: http://www.cnbc.com/id/23057002/

    --
    Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for an hour. Set him on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  7. Sooooo.... by nickj6282 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We're just not going to get an article with this one? Are we supposed to take Kdawson's word for it? Way to go!

  8. Darn by hansamurai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Part of me was hoping this would never be resolved and that this would eventually cause a media revolution. Whether it was the rise of local access channels or simultaneous live airing and official torrent release, I thought there was a small chance it might have really changed things from top to bottom.

    Ah well, at least The Office will be back.

  9. Re:Is it? by NekSnappa · · Score: 5, Informative
    Well according to the Writers Guild website

    The Latest Word

    (2/4/08)

    Dear Fellow Members,

    I would like to update you on where we stand with bargaining with the AMPTP. While we have made important progress since the companies re-engaged us in serious talks, negotiations continue. Regardless of what you hear or read, there are many significant points that have yet to be worked out.

    In order to keep members abreast of the latest developments, informational meetings are being planned by both Guilds for this weekend - details to be announced. Neither the Negotiating Committee, nor the West Board or the East Council, will take action on the contract until after the membership meetings.

    As the talks proceed, never forget that during this period it is critical for us to remain on the picket lines united and strong. We are all in this together.

    In Solidarity,

    John F. Bowman

    Chair, WGA Negotiating Committee

    --
    I want to shoot the messenger!
  10. Oh No!!! What About The Great New Reaility Shows! by webword · · Score: 3, Funny

    Man, if the strike is over too soon then the new reality shows will get killed.

    I mean, aren't you dying to see My Dad Is Better Than Your Dad?

    It debuts on February 18th! Don't miss it, kids!

  11. Re:Was that still going on? by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Personally, I thought Conan, Colbert and Stewart were a lot funnier WITHOUT the writers. It forced them to get creative for the first time in years. Now that the writers are coming back, looks like it's back to the 10-millionth reiteration of "Masturbating Bear" and other tired old skits.

    Could they have just STAYED on strike?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  12. Not dead yet by xsarpedonx · · Score: 2, Informative

    Although it would appear that the strike is likely on it's way to being over, it's not quite over yet.

    Here's the WGA's timetable for the next few days which may result in the actual end of the strike.

  13. I need only three words to explain this by YA_Python_dev · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Joss Whedon, Dollhouse.

    --
    There's a hidden treasure in Python 3.x: __prepare__()
    1. Re:I need only three words to explain this by howdoesth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Joss Whedon, Dollhouse. I was really expecting Dollhouse to get killed during the strike before it ever even had a chance to get off the ground, but it looks like Fox is fully committed to letting me see it, fall in love, and then break my heart after 14 episodes. Thanks, guys.
  14. Re:Was that still going on? by AmaDaden · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They were damn good, but for how long? I don't think they would be able to keep coming up with original material for much longer. They would burn out eventually. If you noticed while their skits were good they needed to be dragged out. More interviews and more 'lets look at this'. They were able to make skits just not nearly as many.

  15. Re:We know who did it by pandrijeczko · · Score: 2, Funny

    I say put Jack Bauer in "Lost" - it would only take HIM 24 hours to get off the island...

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  16. Re:Was that still going on? by Otter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Same here. If a network used the money to pay the Giants and Patriots to play a tiebreaker, it would be more likely to get my attention than new episodes of Law & Order competing with the three Law & Order reruns and eleven CSI reruns on at the same time.

  17. Re:Lets hope... by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    As a Hollywood writer, I am intrigued by this concept of "originality" that you speak of. But I can't quite wrap my head around it. Can you explain it in terms of other things that I'm already comfortable and familiar with?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  18. Oh boy! I can't wait... by jbarr · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...for all of that quality programming to return!

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  19. Re:Was that still going on? by gnick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Conan, Colbert and Stewart were a lot funnier WITHOUT the writers They were hilarious, but uneven. A lot of what they did was novel and fun. But, a lot was pretty weak. As fun as the "feud" was at times, other times it was obviously a lot more drawn out than it needed to be (Captain Obvious, I know...)

    I can't say that I really missed it while it was gone, but I do welcome back The Word.
    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  20. Re:Was that still going on? by danguyf · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, aren't you just Mr. Too Cool For School?

    I'm so glad to know that you didn't even deign to notice that a large portion of those who work hard to entertain you lost their jobs and houses in a fight over the future of online content rights.

  21. Outsourcing Scriptwriters by initialE · · Score: 4, Funny

    It was either that or outsource scripts to India. Imagine Bollywood style comedy on American TV...

    --
    Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  22. Slashdot Users, Yall Let Me Down! :-) by tjstork · · Score: 3, Funny

    40 comments about the writer strike ending and not a single one of you posted the obligatory:

    That's Great, When's Battlestar Galactica Going to Be On Finally?

    They just don't make geeks like they used to, I guess.

    --
    This is my sig.
  23. Re:This is news for nerds... by homey+of+my+owney · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Damn, in time for the Oscars... Why couldn't they hold out for another couple of weeks?

  24. Re:Is it? by longacre · · Score: 4, Informative

    That WGA post was made three days before Eisner's statement. Still, Eisner is the only one saying it's over. No one from WGA or any studios have said a word.

  25. Re:Was that still going on? by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thanks for letting us know.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  26. Re:Was that still going on? by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In all fairness, I'm not sure the "According to Jim" writers deserve your vigorous defense.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  27. Re:So... by OG · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's thinking a bit short term. If their terms are met like they were hoping, it means that they're not cut out of emerging media outlets. That's going to be an important point in the next couple of decades as people shift their content viewing to legitimate online venues and away from traditional television.

  28. Pity It's Over by Phoenix666 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I had a dark horse hope that perhaps the writers would learn to disintermediate the studios. The reason is a friend recently turned me on to BBC's "I.T. Crowd," which you can only watch in the States over the intertubes.

    There are no commercials in the webcast, of course, but the BBC shop sends me emails advertising box DVD sets of Doctor Who and the like; definitely a fave show and the sort of message I'm open to, as opposed to endless commercials on regular TV for cars and feminine hygiene products, which I'm not in the market for.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  29. Re:So what? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does anyone really even give a damn anymore?

    Uhh, yeah. I'd like my last season of BSG, thankyouverymuch.

    Plus a couple of other shows, but that one's top of the list.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  30. Re:So... by jacobw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So the writters get like a couple percent increase in their salaries while they lost about 1/3 of their anual income. These are writters not mathamatitions,


    And based on your comment, "mathamatitions" are not "writters," either.

    Actually, a lot of the people on the WGA negotiating committee are "show runners"--IE, writer/producers with a huge amount of responsibility. One of the negotiators, for example, is Carlton Cuse, one of the two guys who runs LOST; as you can imagine, you don't end up running a multi-million-dollar enterprise unless you have a lot of financial savvy.

    So why would a bunch of smart people recommend a strike under these circumstances? Two main reasons.

    First, writing careers can be very short-lived, and they are usually sporadic, with many periods of unemployment. (In fact, in any given year, nearly half of WGA members are unemployed.) The major issue in this strike was "residuals"--the royalties that writers get every time a TV show they wrote is broadcast, or a movie they wrote is sold. So, it's not entirely foolish to give up your 50% chance of employment this year to get a good deal on royalties that might be feeding your family for the next two decades.

    Second, believe it or not, this was not strictly a selfish action. WGA members are very conscious of the fact that a lot of the stuff that makes it possible for us to earn our livings was won by previous generations of writers. Obviously a desire to have a good living is the main incentive in any business negotiation, but in the back of all our minds, we don't want to be the generation that let the studios roll back several decades of labor gains.

    DISCLAIMER: I am an individual WGA member. These are just my opinions. I don't speak for the union.
  31. Re:Was that still going on? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2, Insightful
    a large portion of those who work hard to entertain you


    If someone doesn't watch tv, then how are/were they affected by this strike? They weren't. I do watch some tv but didn't really notice any change except for reruns of 'How I Met Your Mother' and 'The Big Bang Theory'. Other than that, no problems here either.

    Aside from that, this is probably one of the few times I will agree with a union demand. In this case, yes, the writers should get compensated for their work when that work is sent online, on DVD or elsewhere. The medium doesn't matter. The fact of the matter is, they worked to produced the product, they should get compensated.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  32. Re:This is news for nerds... by bkr1_2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because they want something to come back to when they reach a deal. If they held out past the oscars many "analysts" of the industry speculated they wouldn't be able to recover their viewers. As it is I suspect most of the decent new shows are going to be dead anyway.

    --
    "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
  33. Does that Mean Fred Thompson Will Comeback? by CR0WTR0B0T · · Score: 2, Funny

    I heard he dropped out because without writers he had nothing to say. :) Think he will make a comeback?

    --
    "Nothing to see here. Move along."
  34. Wow by mpapet · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You and the moderators have no clue. Here's a couple of Fun Hollywood Facts.

    1. There is so much money flowing through the distribution cartel, that unions are the only way to wrestle it out of the Producers/Studios. I'm old enough to remember a blockbuster low-budget movie called "My big fat greek wedding" has, to date, not turned a profit. Now, I could see a bad movie not turning a profit, but that movie was and still is INSANELY popular. Hell, my wife still gets residuals from a commercial that appeared in a big-budget movie made 20 years ago. That's how shady Hollywood accounting is.

    2. Writers are about the least respected guild in Hollywood. Seriously, food craft gets more respect. (probably because they aren't a union)

    5. Producers routinely turn great stories/scripts into trash. Once they own the rights to the script, let the destruction begin!!! This is why good books rarely make good movies. Once the writer gives up control it's all downhill. Notable exceptions usually have the writer having final say on the script.

    You, and the idiots who modded you up have no clue.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  35. Whew... by CannedTurkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    I had begun to worry that my supply of fresh books might dry up any day now.

    --
    Ingredients: Turkey, Mechanically Separated Turkey, Water, Salt, Flavour.
  36. Go Battlestar! by BlueshiftVFX · · Score: 2, Informative

    actually I Included that when I submitted the article! since BSG is in it's final season it currently got cut short to 16 eps. now hopefully it can go out with the full 20-22 eps. and finish as intended.

    (I used to work on the show)

  37. the relevant quote from Michael Caine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    in 'Deathtrap': "I'll tell you how good [the script] is. Even a gifted director couldn't hurt it."

  38. Writers' incomes by jacobw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah. As it is, those folks only make $75000 to $100000 a year. That's not much to live on.
    Actually, writers' incomes are all over the place. According to the WGA's annual report, 45% of its members had no income at all in 2006. (Or, at least, no writing-related income; they may have been waiting on tables or doing something else to pay the bills.) Of those who DID work, 25% earned less than $38,740, while 5% earned more than $685,000! With such a wide disparity, you can juggle the statistics to suggest pretty much anything you want. The studios said something like "Working writers earn an average of $200,000 a year" while some writers said things like "the median income of a writer is below $5,000." I suspect both those statistics are, technically, true--notice that one is about an average while the other is about a median.

    Personally, I think the most useful way of looking at a writer's salary is this: 55% of WGA members are employed in a given year, and among those who are employed in a year, the median income is about $107,000. So, with a 55% chance of earning $107,000, your expected annual income is $58,850. This is an excellent income if you are young and single. If you have kids and a mortgage, and you live in LA or NYC (two of the most expensive cities in America), then it's still a good wage, but it's not mansion-and-a-yacht level. This confirms my own experience--the WGA is basically a middle-class union, negotiating with multibillion dollar global companies.

    (I know--I'm making a number of assumptions in my analysis, but I'm not a statistician and I have to simplify things a little. I'd welcome corrections from any of the numerous Slashdot readers who must be better at statistics than I am!)
    1. Re:Writers' incomes by KKlaus · · Score: 2, Informative

      A median is an average. The studios were probably doing a mean (which is what most people think of when they think of an average). And to be honest, there's probably even more distortion than you think. I'm sure the WGA is including a whole pile of unpaid interns on the bottom, and the studios aren't counting those. A lot of ugly distortion all around.

      --
      Relax I just want some peanuts.
    2. Re:Writers' incomes by crashfrog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, with a 55% chance of earning $107,000, your expected annual income is $58,850. This is an excellent income if you are young and single.

      Except that it's also a 45% chance of having no income at all (at least not from writing), and that's not so great. It's pretty hard to pay the rent with a 55% chance of having money.

      --
      I never have frustrations, the reason is, to wit:
      If at first I don't succeed, I quit!
    3. Re:Writers' incomes by jacobw · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're right about the mean/median/average thing. Thanks for catching that.

      However, you're (most likely) wrong about the WGA including "unpaid interns" in its stats. The WGA statistics only cover WGA members; and before you can become a member, you have to have a certain amount of paid TV or film writing work.

      As a labor union, the WGA has to have independently-audited reports of the membership dues it receives and what it does with those dues; it then publicly releases the report as well as submitting it to the Department of Labor. If the WGA is including anybody other than WGA members in its statistics, it is violating federal labor law, and the independent auditors who certify it are colluding in fraud.

      Of course, fraud does happen, auditors do look the other way, and there have been corrupt labor unions in the past, but tbarring evidence to the contrary, I think it's safe to assume that the basic data in the WGA annual report is not fraudulent.

      (Of course, once the WGA releases the data, the numbers can get pulled out of context and subjected to all sorts of technically-true-but-misleading manipulation, which leads us back to where we started.)

  39. Re:Oh No!!! What About The Great New Reaility Show by 0x15e · · Score: 2

    I was really, really hoping you were joking about that. I almost hoped it was a rickroll or goatse or something. Anything would've been better than that.

  40. Re:Is it? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Some choice Eisner quotes:

    "Writers, Writers, Writers!"
    "I'm gonna fscking KILL the WGA!" *throws chair*
    "The Creative Commons licenses are a virus that's destroying the movie industry!"

    and, finally:

    "Linux violates 439 Disney patents!"

  41. Re:This is news for nerds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do they really need writers for "And the winner is..."?

  42. Great by slapout · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now we can get new episodes of our favorite reality shows. Oh wait...

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  43. Re:Oh No!!! What About The Great New Reaility Show by realthing02 · · Score: 2, Funny

    But seriously they aren't going to get rid of American Gladiators, are they?

  44. Re:Was that still going on? by Deagol · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You could ditch (broadcast) TV entirely. Rent movies and quality TV shows on DVD. It takes a few weeks/months to "decompress" from the frenetic need to have some sort of constant visual stimulus to occupy your spare time, but afterwards, you'll both be much better off. Read, play cards, listen to music, or, you know, *talk* with each other. :)

  45. Re:Too late by avronius · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did we finally find someone who choose the "Posthumously" option?

  46. Re:This is news for nerds... by Misch · · Score: 3, Informative

    I really don't know why the different shows didn't just hire scabs and keep going

    Because the actors are represented by the Screen Actors Guild, and the stagehands by the ISTEA. If the studios tried hiring scabs to replace the writers, the actors and stagehands would have walked out as well.

    --

    --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
  47. Disintermediating the Studios by jacobw · · Score: 2, Informative
    There has been some movement in that direction. For example, screenwriter John August recently decided to start shooting a "short-film-slash-web-pilot" on DV. Here's how he explained his decision to take production into his own hands:

    The message from writers to the studios had been, "Come back, baby. We can work this out." But after the second time negotiations fell apart, the message became, "Maybe we should see other people."

    I decided to start seeing other people.
    And then there's StrikeTV. As StrikeTV's MySpace puts it:

    It's an online "channel" featuring original video shows created by working professionals in the TV and Film Industry. These shows are self-funded and owned by their creators. Funds raised by ad revenue will go toward the Writers Guild Foundation Industry Support Fund, assisting non-WGA members, including IATSE and Teamsters affected by the strike. Strike TV videos will not be about the strike. This is a chance for writers to do what they do best - be original and tell stories.
    Of course, the fact that StrikeTV's web presence is a MySpace page demonstrates that technical expertise and writing ability don't always go hand in hand. I think there will always be room for middlemen with business and technical knowledge, but I don't think the studios will ever regain the stranglehold they had on the market a decade or two ago.
  48. Re:Was that still going on? by EVil+Lawyer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Who lost their houses? The vast majority of writers saved up 6 months' salary in anticipation of exactly this strike. Not to say it wasn't a financial hardship, but my friend who currently writes for Scrubs tells me that almost everyone was planning for this.

  49. The strike is NOT over. by VValdo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Guys... Eisner proclaiming the strike over is just part of a PR effort to attempt to pressure writers to vote for the strike proposals by creating the wide expectation that the strike is over, that it's a done deal. That way, if the writers turn the proposal down, people feel let down.

    The strike is NOT over.

    If you watch the video where Eisner insists the strike to be over, he says quietly at the end that he is really just passing on a rumor. He also points out that the writers have to vote on the offer. He says the writers would be "insane" not to take it, but he also previously had stated that the entire strike was "insanity" so he's not the most unbiased person on this.

    The strike is not over until the full WGA membership votes on the proposal. They may do so, but they may not. The terms of the contract proposal have not even been seen by the writers, so there's no way to know right now what's going to happen.

    If you don't believe me, may I recommend this post by Joss Wheden, or this one, or this one.

    W

    --
    -------------------
    This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  50. Re:This is news for nerds... by Original+Replica · · Score: 5, Informative

    Speaking as someone who is in the entertainment industry and has been on strike in the recent past I just want to say; Going on strike is not an easy decision. There is a great deal of consideration that goes into what the industry itself can bare. There is also a great deal of consideration about the long term effects of not going on strike would be. You say that there are have been people that would have been fine with the old contract. True. There are probably people who would be willing to do your job for much less money as well. But what would the long term effects be? In the case of the writers, it would be the end of writing as a viable career option. They were fighting to have the same royalties on internet distribution as they currently have on DVD distribution. Everyone knows that in ten years the vast majority of the distribution will be via the internet, so in essence they were fight to have royalties at all. Royalties are what allow for writing to be career. It was clear from the outset of this strike that the writers would have to do some short term damage to the industry as a whole, in order to preserve the long term existence of their jobs. The reason this was obvious was because the management on the other side of the bargaining table was putting forward a proposal that would have short term gains and long term damage. In the short term they would have profited 3% more on internet sales, but in the long term they would have destroyed the position of professional screen writer, leaving only those who would pursue writing as a hobby. Sure they could always get some starry eyed recently graduated newcomers to fill the job, but as those people tried to do things like buy a house or raise a family, they would be forced out the job by the financial realities of the "old contract". There would be no one around with 20 years of professional experience, there would be no one to really refine the craft, there would only be glorified interns. That isn't good for the industry.

    --
    We are all just people.
  51. Re:This is news for nerds... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, stagehands are represented by the IATSE - or the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employes.

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
  52. Re:Was that still going on? by jaymzter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Any word on a series finale for Scrubs?

    --
    If thou see a fair woman pay court to her, for thus thou wilt obtain love
  53. Curse you monkeys! by IgLou · · Score: 2, Informative

    You heard the man! Back to work and no one gets this banana until someone comes up with the next sitcom!

    --

    Oops, how did this get here?
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  54. It's not over yet.... by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 3, Informative

    WGAW is having a meeting Saturday night with its members to discuss the deal points proposed by the studios. I don't know if the studios have finished "inking" their proposal (i.e. I believe that there was a verbal "fuzzy" agreement but specific legal language is still being drafted).

    The deal will be presented to the membership on Saturday where I believe an informal vote will be taken. I believe that a full ratification vote is required by the constitution for the deal to be formally accepted but that the Board of Directors can lift the strike without before that happens.

    The terms for compensation for Internet re-usage in the DGA deal were not very appealing for Writers and Actors. I haven't seen what the deal terms are that have been proposed to the WGA, but if they didn't make good progress on this, the deal might be met with a mixed reception by members.

    That said, the Negotiating Committee and the Board of Directors have the pulse of the membership my guess is that the membership will go along with the recommendations of the Negotiating Committee and the Board of Directors. I don't know how unanimous the NC/BoD are with respect to the deal (i.e. whether there is agreement that the deal is fair enough or whether the strike should go on longer).

    --
    Evolution: love it or leave it
  55. Re:Was that still going on? by netsavior · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who lost their houses?
    the thousands and thousands of working class people who run lighting, sound, catering, construction, etc etc for these shows.

    The writers and the studios are probably among those LEAST effected by this strike.