Slashdot Mirror


Toshiba Making Funeral Plans for HD DVD

Blue Light Special writes "With HD DVD on life support, Toshiba is reportedly preparing to bow to the inevitable and allow HD DVD to expire quietly. 'While denying that a decision on the fate of HD DVD has been made, a Toshiba marketing exec left the door wide open. "Given the market developments in the past month, Toshiba will continue to study the market impact and the value proposition for consumers, particularly in light of our recent price reductions on all HD DVD players," Jodi Sally, VP of marketing for Toshiba America Consumer Products, said.'" A few folks have also noted that Wal-mart is joining the Blu-ray train, further lowering the stock of HD DVD.

24 of 452 comments (clear)

  1. That's a Shame by thesaint05 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    HD-DVD was cheaper for both players and movies, but I'm glad the format war is officially over. Especially with wal-mart throwing their (considerable) weight behind BD. I just can't stand the fact that Sony won. Oh well. I'm still not buying a BD player until they get sub-$200.

    1. Re:That's a Shame by RetardsForRonPaul · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Unfortunately the lower cost never really materialized. All of the "combo discs" were more expensive than their Blu Ray counterparts. I never understood the point of those discs anyways. And Blu Ray was on "sale" for a long time. I have to wonder if Sony lost a bunch of money subsidizing costs just to get a foothold. That said, Sony and the rest of the BD consortium can go die in a fire. I'm not buying their crippled, DRM laden discs. I'm sick of being treated like a theif, when all I want is reasonably priced HD content. The music industry is slowly coming around, yet the movie industry is steadfast. If they want to treat me like a theif (no managed copy, region encoding, BD+, etc.) then I'll just steal their movies. The interactivity in HD-DVD always rocked. Transformers is an amazing disc. One of the few I own. BD is still catching up in that regard. It kills me, though, since I'm about over the 360, and really want a PS3 as a gaming platform.

    2. Re:That's a Shame by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's the "nice" thing about the different BD profiles--the manufacturers get to keep "updating" their player lines while keeping the price the same. This year at CES, they updated the players to profile 1.1, but kept the list prices the same. Next year, they'll update the players to profile 2.0, and the prices will stay the same (they might come down 50 bucks or so). I'm waiting for a sub-$200 profile 2.0 BD player, too, but I'm not holding my breath.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:That's a Shame by mcsqueak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This year at CES, they updated the players to profile 1.1, but kept the list prices the same.

      Ah yes, I had forgotten about that bit. I'm sure they'll lower the price on the "older" versions... then the suckers who buy those won't be able to see the special features or whatever in the discs released after that point. Nice way to treat your customers I say.

    4. Re:That's a Shame by barzok · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Apparently you didn't buy DVD when it was new. I paid over $500 for my first DVD player, and I didn't even get a 1st gen player (more like 1.5 gen). And that was in 1997 dollars. ... DVD really didn't take off until 3-4 years after it came out, when the players got really cheap.
      1997 + 3-4 years = 2000. PS2 came out in October 2000, mass availability in early 2001.

      Quick show of hands...how many bought a PS2 not because it was a game console, but because it let them get a console and DVD player in one, for not a lot more than a high-quality DVD player?

      PS3/Blu-Ray is going to follow a very similar track, I think.
    5. Re:That's a Shame by zmollusc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it weren't for the evils of DRM, you could do your image-processing on commodity hardware for bugger all cost over however long it took to process the honking great output file.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    6. Re:That's a Shame by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      DVD really didn't take off until 3-4 years after it came out, when the players got really cheap. Which was my exact point! Even though the Blu-Ray/HD-DVD battle that everyone was excited about is supposedly all but over, the less interesting, but ultimately much bigger war- to get people to buy hi-def players at all- isn't. As I said, the quickest way to overcome that *is* to reduce the price.

      Although I don't think it'll happen here, it'd be quite possible to end up with one side technically winning, but still doing badly. Who won out of DVD-A and SACD? Who cares, because neither grabbed a notable share of the market, and hi-def audio as a whole flopped commercially.

      Personally, I don't think interest in HD as a whole will flop the way that hi-def audio flopped. That doesn't mean Blu Ray should rest on its laurels, however. The most obvious problem with keeping the price high would be that it slowed adoption (as you imply).

      Even if the Blu Ray camp could live with that (it'd probably make them more profit in the short term), it'd be a bad idea, simply because of the other understated factor- downloadable HD content. The market is moving that way anyway, and at this stage I reckon it's ultimately a much bigger- but less tangible- threat to Blu-Ray than the moribund HD-DVD.

      In short, the battle's not over. Blu Ray faces threats from current-generation DVD and apathy on one side and the should-have-seen-it-coming threat of downloadable content bypassing their petty squabbles on the other.

      The GGP was so wrong- Blu Ray players need to come down in price as much as ever.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    7. Re:That's a Shame by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't want to go too far into the details, but the processing I had in mind would be a combination of several ideas I'd been mulling over, many of which would require tracking a given object over several frames to average out noise, artifacting errors, and so on. And also to use simultaneous-equation-style processing on the multiple frames of the same object to increase the static resolution (or maybe this could be done more simply by aligning, overlaying and resharpening the multiple copies). Also ideas like more intelligently spotting the difference between genuine detail and pseudo-detail which comes from encoding/compression artifacts, and removing or repairing the latter. (Repair- or guessing what the most likely hi-res detail was that caused or was damaged by the artifact- might be one of those "easier said than done" computationally intensive tasks). Again, easier if you are looking at multiple frames.

      I'm not an expert in this area, but I suspect those that are have probably come up with similar ideas. Whether they're doable in reasonable time, and in hardware is more open to question.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    8. Re:That's a Shame by Dogtanian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Slight tangent, but apparently the "H" in HQV stands for Hollywood. I always thought that Hollywood came across as a kitsch, tacky and sleazy place, but even if you disagree with that, the problem is that most things *named after* Hollywood are cheesy, low-rent type things trying to grab a piece of its alleged glamour... like crap nail bars and hairdressing salons. You don't see Prada (for example) naming their stuff "Hollywood" in an attempt to impress people.

      It makes the HQV product come across as cheap, and the fact that it reminds me of that stupid place is a strike against it. Adding the crap misspelling "optix" just makes it sound worse. Ugh.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    9. Re:That's a Shame by Daetrin · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Or just buy a PS3 and don't worry about it.

      I have a 60GB PS3 and there's not a BD or a special feature out there that it won't play. Nor will there ever be.

      Um, how do you figure that? It's not like the early versions of the PS2 didn't have tons of problems with a fairly wide selection of DVDs. Sure you can argue that since Sony is in charge of both the Blu-Ray format and the PS3 that such problems will be less likely, but they wouldn't be coming out with the 2.0 version if there weren't either problems that needed to be fixed or new functionality they want to add that the old players won't be able to handle, and there's no way they can magically make old PS3s handle the changes. They might be fixable with a driver upgrade... or they might not. (I was told that it wasn't possible to upgrade my 1.xx PS2 to 2.xx, i actually had to trade it in on a new PS2, which my local EB Games kindly did free of charge.)

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    10. Re:That's a Shame by angus_rg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Early adopter phase? It's getting more and more difficult to buy a NON HD TV nowadays! When you can get decent sized HD TVs for sub-$400 it's hard to argue against it. Tubes are practically obsolete, flat panels are all the rage, and there aren't many flat panels out there that aren't HD capable. The numbers say it. We aren't even at 50% of the house holds owning them. Heck, more people have wireless access points, and that is finally starting to become mainstream(do some war driving and count the houses w/ vs w/o). Just because it is getting more difficult/impossible to buy a SD TV doesn't mean people are lining up to buy them. Yes, take a way choice, it will help adoption, but people don't look through the best buy ad they get with their paper(yes, people still get papers) and think, "Wow, I oughta get a new TV since they no longer offer old ones." The average TV should get you at least 7 years use. Lack of choice will simply slowly phase things out. It does not force adoption.

      Insignia 32" LCD HDTV currently on sale for $499CDN. I could buy that with the leavings from my next paycheque. If you'd prefer something smaller you can get a 26" for $399. If you'd rather a name brand you can get a Toshiba 26" for $499. A few years ago I paid $899 for a 32" Sony Vega CRT that's not HD and now I can buy a slim form factor television for half that that's both widescreen and HD capable. Samsung Blu-ray Player (BD-P1400) on sale for $399. So I can meander into Future Shop and pick up a full HD TV visual experience for $901.74 including all of our Ontario and Canadian sales taxes. HD capable also proves my point. HD Capable, 1080i, etc. does not mean you are getting 1920x1080 pixes. When you consider they are fixed pixel devices that down scale a picture to 720p, you aren't getting the full detal that a 1080p tv offers. Considering 720p is a little over double the detail of 480p, and 1080p is over 5 times the detail of 480p, no one is getting excited over it, and for goood reason. I have a CRT TV that can render 1920x1080, even if only 1080i, as well as a Marquee CRT projector which makes the best Best Buy projector look like crap. On both, I see the significant difference and find it is worth it. Most I have talked to say that there isn't enough improvement for them to buy in.

      The cheap TVs are few and far between, most of which lack HD tuners which every sales rep will bash in hopes of the larger sale. You're $399 for a for a player proves my point. Most of the mindless sheep think a $70 upscaler is as good as a BR player. Which do you think the average clueless user is going to buy. AV consumers include a lot of people who aren't technophile. The average user is clueless, and intimidated by the selection.
  2. At least it's over... by framauro13 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Had I not received a PS3 as a gift, I probably would have went HD DVD. But given the circumstances, I'm glad (and suprised) that the choice will eventually only be one single format.

    Hopefully I'll soon be able to get all of my favorite movies in high definition, not just the particular ones owned by production companies who signed specific format deals.

    A lot of people won't be happy about it, but I've gotta admit I'm impressed with how Sony marketing pulled this off. I definitely didn't see it ending this way.

    --
    In an effort to conform with internet communication standards, please note that the above comment is 100% biased opinion
  3. PS3 now viewed as "more attractive"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So, since the format war is over, does this mean the PS3, with a bundled Blu-Ray drive, has more to recommend it in the market place?

    Especially since the "fear and doubt" of buying an obsolete format, are no longer hanging over it?

  4. I'm glad blu ray has won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm glad blu ray has won.

    My point of view: I don't watch movies. I don't even own a television. What format is better for movies and TV doesn't matter to me.

    What does matter for me, however, is being able to use a re-writable form of the media for making backups. HD-DVD only offered 15 gigabytes of storage; Blu-Ray offers 25 gigabytes of storage.

    Now that a format is decided on, economies of scale can kick in and, in a few years, blu-ray blank media will be as cheap as DVD media is right now (I just bought 100 DVD blanks for under $23 at a two-for-one loss leader sale at CostCo; I remember, five years ago, when DVD blanks were $3 or more per disk at the same time CDR blanks were 30 cents a disk).

  5. Hatred of companies by jsheedy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I really find it hard to understand why everyone hates Sony. Yes they did have the rootkit scandal that was not right at all. Though, how many times in your own company have you not agreed with how it handles things. I am in a software company, and they try things that are questionable at times. Really, different sides of the company, may not even know what the other sides are doing (that is wrong too, but when you are a peon, you are just glad to be working). I am not at all saying this is right, but it happens. Companies make mistakes, they learn from them (sometimes not good enough). I just find it hard to hate a company unless what they do is morally objectionable. I guess some could argue that what Sony did was, but I am more on the side of human pain and suffering, like sweat shops or things of that manner. Let us not forget that Toshiba has had scandals arise in the past, I seem to recall something back in th e70s related to selling technology to the USSR...

    There must be a time limit, ok it has been 30 years, I no longer have to hate them. :)

    Just my thoughts, I am sure there will be many that will disagree.

    --
    Quid Pro Quo, nothing more, nothing less.
  6. Poor execution by TheAxeMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They should have pushed the combo discs harder via advertising. I think people would have taken to the idea that they could buy a combo disc (for the same price as a standard HD DVD, eat a little profit there guys) and use it in their DVD player right now and in their HD DVD player when they were cheap enough (like now). But few people knew about them or what they were and they were rarely on the shelves. They made several marketing errors with the format (no v2 xbox360 with HD DVD built in being another) and chose to try to sell it on the definition alone, which wasn't a strength over the BD setup. No region encoding? Awesome.
     
    I really only want documentaries in HD (planet earth) so I don't much care about HD yet and I'm saddened that I'll have to buy some crippled format if I ever want the content. But for me, Blu Ray = Vista, I'll skip it if I can.

  7. Re:Once again, the inferior product by Buran · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because people who just want to watch hi-def movies (and I can definitely tell the difference on my TV between upscaled SD and true HD) don't care which is "better". I sure didn't. If HD-DVD had won I would have bought an HD-DVD player. But once it became apparent that Blu-Ray had won, I went out and bought a Blu-Ray player and I have Blu-Ray movies on their way from amazon right now.

    Why is Blu-Ray inferior? If "inferior" means "where all the movies are going", then I guess inferior it'll have to be. But the people who just want to use hi-def disks for storage are a minority. A vocal one, apparently, but a minority.

    The best medium in the world that has nothing that most people want to use it for is of little use, after all.

    And I don't see why one or the other is inferior or superior over the other, either. This is not a request to inundate me with tech specs or whining about how your pet format won or lost, though, like every other blog post on the net seems to be.

    Blu-Ray won. People, just deal with it. Did people whine this much when VHS won out, too?

  8. Re:HD DVD joins Betamax in tech hell! by cyber-dragon.net · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This war was not about consumers, it had nothing to do with people in any way. It was about licensing fees. MS wanted to secure it's hold on MPAA DRM contracts (see Netflix explanation on why they can't offer Linux or Mac streaming yet to understand this) and Sony wanted to increase PS3 sales and ensure their home theatre setups did not get encroached on by Toshiba.

    On top of that the per disk money Sony and/or Microsoft gets for the "interactive" portions.

    This was a war about money and control, the consumer had nothing to do with it except as an afterthought in trying to figure out how to market one particular version of DRMd crap over another.

    You forget the driving factor... companies do not care about the consumer any more, the fact they need consumers is unfortunate in their eyes. Large corporations have not cared about the individual consumer over the all mighty dollar for decades. They care about the consumer and their employees only enough to be efficient on the bottom line. Bad PR means less revenue. There are entire JOBS where people are payed to research this balance of "how badly can we screw people and still have them buy our stuff"

    All the people who shop at Circuit City, Best Buy etc instead of mom and pop shops caused this. All you have to do is get into those stores, and only megacorps can, and you are golden. Consumers have never learned to control the corps, which despite what they may think IS possible. See above paragraph on people who are payed to deal with balancing PR. It is YOUR responsibility to force companies to do what you want by voting with your money. If your beliefs aren't worth not owning a copy of some DVD well they weren't very strongly held.

  9. Silver lining by The-Bus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I supported the HD DVD format while it was viable (until WB pulled out). The silver lining is that the competition between the formats made hardware very, very cheap. Less than 18 months into the launch of both formats, we had HD DVD players go for ridiculously low sums. Blu-Ray backers didn't counter with matching prices, but they did drop the prices of their players (to sub-$500 levels). Software, too, became a bit cheaper. In-store, non-web pricing of high-def media was usually $29-$39, a good two- or three-fold increase over the regular DVD price. In 2007, especially in the summer and fall, there were numerous great deals on Blu-Ray discs. For every sale on HD DVD media, there were 4 or 5 on Blu-Ray: buy one, get one frees, etc. This was a smart move, as it lowered the cost of entry for people who had PS3s and honestly weren't too excited about the new formats. Now instead of paying $10 or $15 more at the store, the price difference would be $5 or less.

    Of course, the counter-part to this was the whole confusion between the rival formats and a lot of people who cashed into a new format weeks before its demise. But, even if HD DVD is dead, the discs and players still work.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  10. Name Wins Afterall by rjcarr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I remember reading on the various tech sites that blu-ray was bound for no other reason than the name. People know what HD and DVD is, but WTF is a blu-ray? This seemed to be the unanimous opinion of techies, myself (somewhat) included.

    It turns out that every non-techie I would talk to would ask about blu-ray but I never heard anything about hd-dvd. It turns out the techies were wrong, people bought onto blu-ray since it was something they hadn't heard and immediately understood it was a new format.

    HD-DVD, on the other hand, didn't come across as a new format, but simply watching DVDs on your (new) HD television. I've had so many non-techies tell me how they are excited to get some HD-DVDs to watch on their new HDTV, not having a clue it was a different format requiring a different player.

    Anyone want to apologize for getting it totally wrong? Maybe not "ipod ... lame" wrong, but still pretty wrong.

  11. We have good stuff now though by TheAxeMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My $350 HTPC can upscale a DVD marvelously at 720p (my TV resolution) and I can't imagine the need for BD to get approximately the same picture (due to downscaling). At 1080p it might make a difference since software would be scaling to ~5x the resolution so your dynamic image processing might take over there. But you're still limited by the display. Besides, you only notice the picture sucks if you set less than ~5ft away ;)

  12. Re:Ew... by samkass · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can't see them satisfied with the market share of 20% in next-gen consoles

    The Wii is doing great, but the PS3 has been picking up quite a bit of steam. The XBox360 is also doing great in the US, but not so much elsewhere. Sony got broadsided early on, but has been surprisingly competitive as of late.

    I think the interesting thing is that the Wii is selling to a lot of people who would probably never, no matter how Sony would have priced, packaged or marketed it, bought a PS3. Thus, the Wii is increasing the size of the total market, which isn't all bad for Sony. Also, the Wii is cheap enough that for those would WOULD buy one of the other consoles, it's not necessarily an either/or decision-- many can buy a Wii AND a PS3.

    --
    E pluribus unum
  13. Re-brand to "High Density"...? by keith_nt4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't suppose I'm the first one to think of this (or maybe I am) but it seems like they could re-brand HD-DVD from "High Definition" to "High Density" and sell the discs as blank storage media for PCs and other devices. It'd be perfect. Am I really the only one who has thought of this?

    --
    "UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity." -Dennis Ritchie
  14. You do not need Profile 1.x by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you just want to watch movie (most people do) any Blu-Ray player will do (yes, Samsung fixed the problem that lawsuit as around where a few discs would not play).

    If you want to be able to shop FROM YOUR disc a specialized web store based on the movie you just watched - well then, may God have mercy on your soul.

    HD-DVD had all kinds of cool internet features - that hardly anyone used more than to show it could be done.

    Oh yeah, I forgot the other hot thing you can do with internet access from your movie player - watch up to date trailers, just like you can on your PC. Wohoo!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley