Slashdot Mirror


Full Lunar Eclipse for the Americas on Wednesday

KingArthur10 writes "It will be the last lunar eclipse until December 2010, and it should be spectacular. Shades of turquoise and red will pour over the moon's surface as it moves into the Earth's shadow around 8:43pm EST. As NASA reports: 'Transiting the shadow's core takes about an hour. The first hints of red appear around 10 pm EST (7 pm PST), heralding a profusion of coppery hues that roll across the Moon's surface enveloping every crater, mountain and moon rock, only to fade away again after 11 pm EST (8 pm PST). No special filter or telescope is required to see this spectacular event. It is a bright and leisurely display visible from cities and countryside alike. While you're watching, be alert for another color: turquoise. Observers of several recent lunar eclipses have reported a flash of turquoise bracketing the red of totality ... The source of the turquoise is ozone.' So, all of you amateur astronomers need to get out there and take pictures. It might be worthwhile sharing them on sites like SpaceWeather or Flickr so that our Asian, European, African, and Australian brethren can witness the sight as well."

87 comments

  1. Turquoise? by Trogre · · Score: 1

    I witnessed a total eclipse in 2007, but noticed no turquoise. I'm pretty sure I know why though, living as I do in New Zealand...

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:Turquoise? by Daimanta · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, they are talking about Imperial turquoise. We, on the other hand, use metric turqoise.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    2. Re:Turquoise? by neonmonk · · Score: 0

      For some reason whenever I read this kind of thing I have a massive urge to check Snopes. Even if the source is NASA for example...

      Damn those pranksters at NASA!

    3. Re:Turquoise? by HartDev · · Score: 1

      Haha the point is that all different kinds of colors....or bluish colors.....

      --
      To see a few of my Android apps goto: www.hartwired.com
    4. Re:Turquoise? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Funny, it's never looked Bluish to me!

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    5. Re:Turquoise? by n6kuy · · Score: 1

      Next time, take a Viagra first.

      --
      If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
    6. Re:Turquoise? by TheMidnight · · Score: 1

      Oh great. A bluish princess.

    7. Re:Turquoise? by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 1

      Smurfette? I thought Smurfs were Communist.

      --
      Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
  2. Netcraft confirms it... by Daimanta · · Score: 4, Funny

    The moon is dying!

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    1. Re:Netcraft confirms it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you miss it?

  3. Better get ready... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yikes, that snuck up on me. I'd better start collecting them now if I want to have 100 virgins ready for the sacrifice.

    1. Re:Better get ready... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      well, you've certainly come to the right place to get them.

    2. Re:Better get ready... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hi there. I don't usually post but, as a Dark Malevolent Entity myself, I thought I'd clear a little something up.

      See, we Shapeless Horrors really, how do I put this delicately, well, we don't want your kind. You know, the whole living in mom's basement, pale and pimply, obese, comic book type virgin. Your souls really simply don't do it for us.

      I mean, sure, you meet the technical qualification of virginity, but there's just not the same flair in you guys as in, say, a young and beautiful maiden type virgin. That's what we Unspeakable Things from the World Beyond Sanity are looking for.

      If some schmuck sacrifices a hundred Slashdotters, do you think I'll actually appear before him, much less do him any favors? No. At best, I fart in his general direction, at worst, I dismember him out of spite. Believe me, low grade sacrifices are more common than you'd think.

      At first, it was fun to experiment with you geek types, but the heartburn afterwards just isn't worth it. Ever get indigestion from souls that haven't seen the sun in months? Not fun.

      Please, just keep this in mind this eclipse: If you plan on summoning me or any other Terrors from Outside the Realm of Human Comprehension, do us a favor and use only the highest grade virgin Anyway, I look forward to meeting and eating some of you.

      Warmest wishes,
      D. Cheney

    3. Re:Better get ready... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Its ok. You probably own my soul anyway. I really needed that new video card.

    4. Re:Better get ready... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn! You got a video card? I settled for extra free cheese on my pizza.

    5. Re:Better get ready... by n6kuy · · Score: 1

      The gods are gonna be pissed when they find out they're Slashdot virgins, and not female ones...

      --
      If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
    6. Re:Better get ready... by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      What is this "sun" that you speak of?

    7. Re:Better get ready... by flyingsquid · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Warmest wishes, D. Cheney

      So you're comparing the Vice President of the United States, Dick Cheney, to the infernal demons from the lowest, blackest depths of the abyss of Hell? Man, that's pretty harsh. I think you owe those demons an apology.

    8. Re:Better get ready... by stormguard2099 · · Score: 1

      Considering most /.ers don't even know 100 women much less 100 young and beautiful maiden types that's going to be a pretty hard quota to fill. well, just do your best and pad out the rest of the numbers with civil liberties. That's seems to have appeased him in the past.

      --
      http://greenobyl.com/ please.... think of the children!!
    9. Re:Better get ready... by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Informative
      What is this "sun" that you speak of?

      The sun is a mass of incandescent gas, it's a gigantic nuclear furnace where hydrogen is built into helium at a temperature of millions of degrees.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    10. Re:Better get ready... by Meski · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. Would you be wanting the wise or the foolish virgins, sirrah?

    11. Re:Better get ready... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that was Rosie O'Donnell.

    12. Re:Better get ready... by tgrigsby · · Score: 1


      Warmest wishes,
      D. Cheney


      Funniest part of the whole message. +5.

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
  4. Translation by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 3, Funny

    for those of us in the Northeast it will be raining

    1. Re:Translation by tloh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Alas, the forecast thus far for the San Francisco Bay Area is currently "mostly cloudy" for Wednesday as well. However, should we get a lucky break with any moments of clear sky, the Astronomy department at City College of San Francisco will host anyone who care to venture to the roof of the Science Building for a view of the event. We'll have telescopes set up for folks who'd want a closer look at the craters and maria.

      The Science Building is at the main campus at 50 Phelan Avenue. It is the only one on the hill with a dome on the roof - you can't miss it. Don't be to startled at all the construction and landscaping work going on. It wouldn't affect your enjoyment of the moon.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    2. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Forecast says that there will be clear open skies down here in South Florida. But, regarding the virgins, I don't think I will be able to find any. I live in Miami for god's sake! I never seen a virgin in my whole life! Even geeks here got some crazed mami willing to do us. And the kind of virgins Dick Cheney asked for, they haven't ever existed in Miami...

    3. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think YOU got it bad?

      I haven't seen the SUN, let alone stars or moon, since last summer!

      Try living in the pacific northwest if you want REAL clouds.

    4. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Cleveland, we're pretty much right behind you folks in Seattle, Portland, etc. Sure enough, forecast for Wednesday night here: Mostly cloudy, with a low of 8 deg F.

    5. Re:Translation by anothy · · Score: 1

      Alas, the forecast thus far for the San Francisco Bay Area is currently "mostly cloudy"...
      i could've told you that without the date.
      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
  5. The "IT" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... as the it moves into the Earth's shadow...
     
    Oh no! The IT has returned! It shall be moving into earth's shadow and then consume us all!!! First to go will be /. editor's who don't bother proofreading.

    1. Re:The "IT" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And IT will say, 'I am the Destroyer of Worlds and the Eater of n00bs!'

    2. Re:The "IT" by boourns · · Score: 1

      Oh, so that's where it.slashdot.org got ITs name.

    3. Re:The "IT" by achurch · · Score: 3, Funny

      First to go will be /. editor's who don't bother proofreading.

      Followed in short order by anonymous cowards who don't bother proofreading.

    4. Re:The "IT" by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      And then it will be revealed that IT is just a two-wheeled standing scooter.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  6. NASA's instuctions for lunar eclipse noobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    From TFA:

    The Sun goes down. The Moon comes up. You go out and look at the sky. Observing the eclipse is that easy. Maximum eclipse, and maximum beauty, occurs at 10:26 pm EST (7:26 pm PST).

    Try not to fsck it up, noob! Okay?
    1. Re:NASA's instuctions for lunar eclipse noobs by Cheetahfeathers · · Score: 1

      But the eclipse is where the moon is in shadow and can't be seen! How am I supposed to watch the moon if it's in eclipse?! n00b fail.

  7. Times are off by Hikahi · · Score: 1

    It says the eclipse starts at 8:43 Est, lasts an hour, but the first hints of red don't appear till 10 Est? Something screwy there.

    --
    Nessun maggior dolore, Che ricordarsi del tempo felice Nella miseria. -Dante
    1. Re:Times are off by nightwraith22 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The eclipse lasts over 3 hours (8:43pm to 12:09am). It's totality, when the moon passes through the umbra (i.e. the core of the shadow as the summary quotes), that lasts for an hour lasts from 10pm to 11pm. More info on lunar eclipses at http://www.mreclipse.com/Special/LEprimer.html

  8. can anyone give a real schedule? by rgrbrny · · Score: 1
    OK, I know I'm expecting too much, but:

    Shades of turquoise and red will pour over the moon's surface as the it moves into the Earth's shadow around 8:43pm EST. As NASA reports: 'Transiting the shadow's core takes about an hour. The first hints of red appear around 10 pm EST (7 pm PST), heralding a profusion of coppery hues that roll across the Moon's surface enveloping every crater, mountain and moon rock, only to fade away again after 11 pm EST (8 pm PST). What starts before 9, lasts about an hour, and ends after 11?

    -r

    "News flash! The world's population is getting dumber! Details when the big hand is on the 12..."

    1. Re:can anyone give a real schedule? by Sparr0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Reading comprehension FTW! It takes about 3 hours for the entire eclipse to pass, and the middle hour is the period of total eclipse, referred to in TFA as "Transiting the shadow's core".

    2. Re:can anyone give a real schedule? by Walpurgiss · · Score: 1

      I believe it means that the eclipse in total lasts from before 9 to after 11, but the moon is only completely obscured for about an hour.
      Dunno. Makes more sense to me that way.

    3. Re:can anyone give a real schedule? by v1 · · Score: 1

      I wish there were some coverage of this by my local weather channels, there's no mention of an eclipse and usually they feature these when they're coming up. The weather report is partly cloudy, maybe they're waiting for their crystal ball to clear up a bit before saying whether or not we're going to miss it here in Iowa.

      (I know, meteorologists don't study meteors)

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    4. Re:can anyone give a real schedule? by value_added · · Score: 5, Informative
      (I know, meteorologists don't study meteors)

      Ah, but didja know why?

      http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/meteor

      The streaks of light we sometimes see in the night sky and call meteors were not identified as interplanetary rocks until the 19th century. Before then, the streaks of light were considered only one of a variety of atmospheric phenomena, all of which bore the name meteor. Rain was an aqueous meteor, winds and storms were airy meteors, and streaks of light in the sky were fiery meteors. This general use of meteor survives in our word meteorology, the study of the weather and atmospheric phenomena. Nowadays, astronomers use any of three words for rocks from interplanetary space, depending on their stage of descent to the Earth ...

      meteor
      1471, "any atmospheric phenomenon," from M.Fr. meteore (13c.), from M.L. meteorum (nom. meteora), from Gk. ta meteora "the celestial phenomena," pl. of meteoron, lit. "thing high up," neut. of meteoros (adj.) "high up," from meta- "over, beyond" (see meta-) + -aoros "lifted, hovering in air," related to aeirein "to raise" (see aorta). Specific sense of "fireball, shooting star" is attested from 1593. Atmospheric phenomena were formerly classified as aerial meteors (wind), aqueous meteors (rain, snow, hail), luminous meteors (aurora, rainbows), and igneous meteors (lightning, shooting stars). Meteoric in the figurative sense of "transiently brilliant" is from 1836.
    5. Re:can anyone give a real schedule? by n6kuy · · Score: 1

      > What starts before 9, lasts about an hour, and ends after 11?

      Prime Time Television?
      Lasts about an hour, if you subtract all the commercials...

      --
      If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
    6. Re:can anyone give a real schedule? by fuego451 · · Score: 1

      Damn! We've got thunderstorms scheduled for Wednesday night here in northeastern Oklahoma. Oh well, maybe I'll get to see a tornado; from a distance of course. Yeah, I know it will be dark then but have you ever seen almost constant lightning at night?

    7. Re:can anyone give a real schedule? by Gunther+Maplethorpe · · Score: 3, Funny

      You guys schedule your storms? We Coloradoans need to get with the times; we still just wait for ours to happen sporadically.

    8. Re:can anyone give a real schedule? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure sounds better than hockey, where the game starts before 6pm, lasts about an hour, and finishes well after midnight.

    9. Re:can anyone give a real schedule? by thatnerdguy · · Score: 1

      Well they get so many, have to make they have time to fit them all in.


      As for here in Montreal, the forecast says cloudy periods, so here's hoping that I'll be able to check it out...If I haven't flown to to escape our record-breaking winter.

      --
      I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes
    10. Re:can anyone give a real schedule? by fuego451 · · Score: 1

      "we still just wait for ours to happen sporadically."

      Oh, kind of like winning football games, huh? ;) Yes, CU managed to beat the Sooners last season as well.

    11. Re:can anyone give a real schedule? by cthulu_mt · · Score: 1
      In the vein of weather related humor (or humour)...

      As for here in Montreal, the forecast says cloudy periods You have cloudy periods? You may want to see a doctor about that. Here in the US they are usually red.

      Thank you; I'll be here all week. Be sure to tip your waitress.
      --
      Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
    12. Re:can anyone give a real schedule? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      You guys schedule your storms? Oh, yes. Too bad the post office isn't as efficient as the weather service.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  9. Visible in Europe, Africa too by ebcdic · · Score: 4, Informative

    It'll just a bit later in the night here.

    1. Re:Visible in Europe, Africa too by Smauler · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thanks for that - I'd just assumed it'd be in the Americas from what I read until your comment. If I'm really determined, I might go straight to bed when I get home on Tuesday, and try to wake up for 3am or so (I get up at 6 for work anyway), but I doubt that will happen. If anyone else in the UK (and most of western Europe) is interested, here's what I found out about times from Alpha Galileo :

      It begins at 0035 GMT when the Moon enters the lightest part of the Earth's shadow, the penumbra. Soon after the Moon will have a slight yellowish hue. At 0142 GMT the Moon starts to enter the dark core of the Earth's shadow, the umbra. At 0301 GMT the Moon will be completely within the umbra - the 'total' part of the eclipse has begun. This is the time when it should have an obvious red colour. Mid-eclipse is at 0326 GMT and the total phase ends at 0352 GMT. At 0509 GMT the Moon leaves the umbra and the eclipse ends when the Moon leaves the penumbra at 0617 GMT.
    2. Re:Visible in Europe, Africa too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd have to be really determined to go to bed straight after work on Tuesday - the eclipse is early on Thursday morning.

    3. Re:Visible in Europe, Africa too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can Europeans see OUR eclipse?!!! We own everything in space and science!!

      We should bomb them right back to the stone age!!

    4. Re:Visible in Europe, Africa too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like my part of the US, your forecast for Wednesday is cloudy. I hope it's wrong.

    5. Re:Visible in Europe, Africa too by pha95mlb · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly, the headline doesn't make that very clear does it? Basically it's visible anywhere where it's dark between 0300-0400 GMT.

  10. Obligatory Wikipedia Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For us nerds who aren't well versed in astronomic happenings, the Wikipedia article is a good read.

    I was confused about why a full lunar eclipse would turn the moon red and not darken it out completely. Also some neat stuff on diffraction and the umbra shadows.

  11. From TFA: by breem42 · · Score: 3, Informative

    > Editor's note: This story is written for an American audience, but not only
    > Americans can see the eclipse. People in Europe and western Africa are also
    > favored. International maps and timetables may be found here.

    --
    If the answer is war, you are asking the wrong question
  12. Clarification and Full Details by Genocaust · · Score: 5, Informative

    NASA has the scoop on everything, including pretty pictures and charts of when you can see what based on timezone :)

    --
    It could be that the only purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others.
  13. Correction by FeebleOldMan · · Score: 3, Informative

    It will be the last TOTAL lunar eclipse until December 2010

    Plenty of eclipses before 2010, just not total ones.
    1. Re:Correction by luna69 · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I was going to say that but checked to see if anyone else did. Glad someone beat me to it.

      --
      No gods, no demons, and no masters. Secular Humanism!
    2. Re:Correction by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Interesting too that it's said like December 2010 is like a decade in the future rather than under three years. Like it's a no-interest period for a car loan.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  14. Anyone know a "Lack of rain" dance? by yeremein · · Score: 1

    The weather forecast doesn't look good where I am... or anywhere within hundreds of miles... sigh...

    1. Re:Anyone know a "Lack of rain" dance? by More_Cowbell · · Score: 1

      What country are you in? There are dozens, but the steps vary by region...

      --
      Experience teaches only the teachable. -AH
  15. Do not stare directly at the eclipse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Each year many people go blind while masterbating to lunar eclipses.

  16. "editors", not "editor's" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subject says it all.

  17. Yes, but... by niteice · · Score: 1

    Will we see the dark side of the moon?

    --
    ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
    1. Re:Yes, but... by luna69 · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      --
      No gods, no demons, and no masters. Secular Humanism!
  18. Photography suggestions by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 4, Informative

    Use a long lens. A telescope is handy; 300mm will be about right to shoot the Moon rising through the trees or other scenery, as it will be doing here during the eclipse. Real closeups will need 1000 to 2000mm focal length.

    Bracket heavily. During the last good eclipse I shot from 1/2 to 10 seconds during totality at f/8.

    Enjoy. The weather forecast here (Vancouver) is not favourable. The eclipse last August was almost completely clouded out too. Sigh.

    ...laura

    1. Re:Photography suggestions by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      I took these pictures of last year's March 3rd lunar eclipse in the UK with a Canon EOS 350D and the 70-300mm IS lens. Exposure? Initially, 1/320s, f8, ISO 200 - and eclipsed, around 1/30s, f5.6, ISO 1600.

      (Something about telling myself OH YOU SILLY TWIT REMEMBER TO TAKE YOUR TRIPOD WITH YOU NEXT TIME - the shots were all hand-held! It's pretty straightforward to get some half-decent pictures, and with a bit of work some excellent pictures are there for the taking. Hope the weather's good - it was utterly fantastic for the eclipse I saw...)

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    2. Re:Photography suggestions by jbrower · · Score: 1

      Wow. It's supposed to be cloudy in Vancouver? Who woulda thought?

    3. Re:Photography suggestions by BubbaJonBoy · · Score: 1

      That shutter speed seems far too long a at the indicated aperture even if the film/ISO speed were down to 64. A well known guide is the "Sunny 16 rule" whereby on a sunny day the proper exposure is had by taking the inverse of your ISO as the shutter speed and aperture at f16. So if you're shooting at ISO 400 the proper exposure for a sunny day would be that available shutter speed closest to 1/400such as a standard shutter speed of 1/500. A lesser known rule is that there is an equivalent for the *full* moon using f11.
      Also - the transit speed of the moon would make any shot at 10 seconds absolutely useless as it would move a substantial distance during exposure. Unless you're using a clocked drive (like you would find on a good telescope).
      That being said this is an eclipse with attendant reduction in illumination. Typically this would be about 3 fstops. So with an ISO of 400 you should be fine using 1/400 @ f4 or if using a 'scope with an aperture of - say f11 - it would be fine using a shutter speed of 1/60 or so.
      regards,
      Jon

  19. For a lucky few of us..... by budword · · Score: 1

    For a lucky few of us, it won't matter if it's cloudy then or not. I'll be flying between ALT and CHI then. :)

    1. Re:For a lucky few of us..... by stormguard2099 · · Score: 1

      you just make sure to tell your pilot to keep his eyes on his job and promise to describe it to him once yall have safely landed in CHI

      --
      http://greenobyl.com/ please.... think of the children!!
    2. Re:For a lucky few of us..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I have an older brother who is a commercial pilot. Years ago flying commuters around the northeast he had a chance to see the Northern Lights on a very clear night. It was late flight and the cabin of the 1900 was half full. My brother put a request to the controller if he could do big S turns for a few minutes. With clearance accepted he then informed the passengers about the light display and that he was going to make slow turns for a few minutes so folks on both sides could get a good view.

      Every one of the passengers debarking thanked him for providing an opportunity to see this amazing light show. If I was flying around the country Weds night I would hope my pilot would allow his or her passengers the chance to see this rare event.

  20. Re:English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    84.9 million disagree.

  21. my experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    i too shot the last eclipse, and just wanted to add my thoughts (this was my first time shooting an eclipse). I shot ASA100, F4 (wide open on my longest lens, around 350mm). During the beginning of the eclipse (the first faint sliver of black appearing) I was shooting 1/320th. During the "red" period (where the moon was totally eclipsed) I was shooting as long as 8 second exposures. I was less than pleased with the resulting sharpness. My offhand guess is that anything over 1-2seconds is too long to get a sharp image, given the rotation of the earth, etc. This would be exacerbated by even longer focal lengths. In retrospect, I wish I'd shot ASA400 or 800 to ensure I could expose for 1 second or less. Ideally i'd like to expose for no more than 1/30th.. but that is.. idealistic. Also, keep in mind the earth is rotating, and if you're using a standard tripod (and not special rotatonal compensating astology type of tripod), you'll need to reframe several times, unless you frame the scene VERY wide. Also, I was shooting in suburban Los Angeles.. which was clear sky, but of course the worst possible Bortle rating for sky brightness. I am tempted to try and shoot this one with a longer lens (800mm) at ASA400 from the desert in Heseperia or somewhere similarly brighter. But.. with traffic being what it is in LA, I don't think this is worth a 3-4hr (each way!) drive, nor the hour (or more) hike into the desert.

  22. That's an easy one by Daimanta · · Score: 1

    It's a time machine!

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
  23. Snickers bar. by furbearntrout · · Score: 1

    My brother got a snickers bar in Basic.
    Says it's the best thing he's ever eaten.

    --
    Crap. What did the new CSS do with the "Post anonymously" option??
  24. you think so? by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Flying into Chicago O'Hare (ORD) huh? That's what they all say. I've got news for you - a plane's never landed at that airport - it's too crowded.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  25. Australian brethren by Rizzer · · Score: 1

    ...ah, we had our own lunar eclipse last year thanks. America is only just catching up ;)

  26. Gotta be a Scriptural precedent - here it is by marquis111 · · Score: 1

    I've seen this before!
    Malachi 1:8
    And if ye offer the blind [wearing glassses] for sacrifice, is it not evil? and if ye offer the lame and sick [3P's - pasty, pimply, pudgy], is it not evil? offer it now unto thy governor [or elected official of one's choice]; will he be pleased with thee, or accept thy person? saith the LORD of hosts.

    Gotta be a fulfilled prophecy if I've ever seen one.