Slashdot Mirror


Leaked RIAA Training Video

An anonymous reader writes "Gizmodo has a clip of that RIAA training video produced with the NDAA for US prosecutors that was leaked to torrent sites a few days ago. It argues they should pursue piracy cases because it leads to bigger and badder wares, like handguns, drugs, terrorist orgs, and hardcore repeat offender criminals. It's kind of sad how far they're stretching to bring law enforcement into the matter."

28 of 335 comments (clear)

  1. gateway crime misinformation by Will+the+Chill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is just the same old "gateway crime" argument, which, if history is any example, will inevitably be scientifically proven false by statistical studies showing (perhaps a correlation, but) no causation.

    All agressive prosecutors (persecutors?) will fall back on this precept when it starts to become clear the "crime" they're fighting against is victimless and thus shouldn't be considered a crime at all.

    I find this is mostly caused by greed and ignorance on the part of the persecuting party and any agencies they employ in their unethical battle.

    -WtC

    *error 404: sig not found*

    --
    Creator of RPerl, Scouter, Juggler, Mormon, Perl Monger, Serial Entrepreneur, Aspiring Astrophysicist, Community Organiz
    1. Re:gateway crime misinformation by Samgilljoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is just the same old "gateway crime" argument, which, if history is any example, will inevitably be scientifically proven false by statistical studies showing (perhaps a correlation, but) no causation.

      And the old gateway crime argument is just a form of the ancient post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy.

      People fill in the gaps in their information with ideology. Unfortunately, a great deal of law enforcement training perpetuates these ideas. Time and again, they'll tell you that people convicted of felony X first committed misdemeanor Y, but they fail to notice that they have no idea how many people actually commit misdemeanor Y without ever coming under the radar. Counterarguments which are under the radar, like the hordes of people who smoke pot but don't do crack, are filed away as potential crack smokers rather than demonstrations that smoking pot does not necessarily lead to smoking crack. They also ignore extensions of their own arguments, and not just the ad nauseam examples. For instance, one could just as easily say that drinking beer leads to smoking crack even in adults, but they won't. Why causal linkages between beer and pot and crack are so strong in kids, while the link between beer and anything "druggy" magically disappears during adulthood is beyond me, but then, I only had 9 years of full-time University education and 3 years of doctoral research, so I guess I ain't clever enough to suss out thar thinkun'

    2. Re:gateway crime misinformation by tubapro12 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Interesting idea, but the way I see it, if they're going to argue that piracy is a gateway crime, how can they not argue that music makes people violent? I have to offset this with the fact that they are the RIAA, nevertheless, combining these two opinions seems roughly logically consistent to me.

    3. Re:gateway crime misinformation by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fact is, "pirating" is doing the same job today as radio did 10-20 years ago, promotes the artist.
      Radio stations (and the artists they play) are supported financially, usually advertising. The mere impression of an ad is worth a certain amount of money, and a portion of that money goes towards the artist (if they so desire it). Plus, unlike pirated media, radio can't easily form a library the same way CDs or downloads can, so the radio would encourage to a much greater degree the purchasing of media that could form a library. With radio, you're distributing an advertisement for the music. With piracy, you're distributing the product itself for free.

      I'd also like to say that's it's the RIAA's own damn business how they distribute their music. You can make all the recommendations you wish to them about what will help them get more money, but it's ultimately up to them as to what rights outside of fair use they wish to allow. If you don't like it, don't buy it, and don't pirate it. If it's commercially feasible, the free market should spit out a music label that allows more flexible licensing, one that recognises the potential of sharing, but until then, quit giving the government yet another reason to cave to the RIAA's demands.
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    4. Re:gateway crime misinformation by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem with that is this---THEY paid off OUR congress critters to change OUR laws!!! I should be able to download Elvis and Jimi and Janis now,they SHOULD be public domain.But thanks to the "bono rots in hell act" or whatever they called it copyright is what,a century and a half or something? The whole point of copyright was a fair trade,you get to make money for awhile,and then WE the public gets a greater public domain to choose from.THEY declared war by raping our public domain and until the law is changed it is an unjust law,and therefore it should be fought at every opportunity.I will not buy their *.AA garbage and if someone wants to steal their crap I say have at it.THEY started it,not us!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  2. No no no. Stop. Right now. Fucking Stop. by LordKaT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    NO. Fucking stop it.

    STOP RIGHT THERE GOVERNMENT.

    I am not going to let you use my tax money to start a "War on Piracy" - just like your dumbass "War on Drugs"

    STOP. BAD DOG! NO BISCUIT FOR YOU!

    Seriously, the only way you can teach these fucking politicians is by hitting them in the nose.

    1. Re:No no no. Stop. Right now. Fucking Stop. by Brieeyebarr · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maybe this will cause even more people to see how flawed the logic that proponents of the "war on drugs" use.

      It is the same basic idea, just even less true.

    2. Re:No no no. Stop. Right now. Fucking Stop. by QCompson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously, the only way you can teach these fucking politicians is by hitting them in the nose. So, to follow the war on drugs analogy, we should... keep voting for them?
  3. Humorous by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is the one with Tom Cruise, right?

    I have not seen the video but I find it quite humorous when some organization's materials for training/brainwashing are leaked and it makes headlines. I.E. Scientology, RIAA, etc. What would even be funnier if the RIAA took the same position the Church of Scientology did and tried to repress this video.

    Repression of information is the first sign of a flawed ideology. As we've seen in many court cases in which they've shut down systems, the RIAA is against any kind of information sharing via P2P software and therefore has a flawed ideology.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  4. The Irony Is... by fsckr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That many of the 'artists' that the RIAA protects are hardcore repeat offender criminals that are pimping the handguns, drugs etc etc

    --
    fsckr.com - go fusk yourself!
  5. Public education campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While it is good to have employees believe in the company I do not think that is what this video is about. They want high profile crime with media coverage to be associated with piracy. This will cement the "evil" in the publics view of piracy. Even if it is incidental, having that association there will eventually cement the opinion.

    Its not saying where you find piracy there will be terrorism. They are saying to law enforcement to use piracy as an excuse to bust otherwise known criminals. This will lead to the association of piracy with hardened criminal activity. Mentioned frequently enough in the news it becomes a very powerful public education tool.

    --
    Anonymous

    1. Re:Public education campaign by Chrondeath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do people associate tax evasion with mobsters because of Al Capone?

  6. Save the Next Britney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Someone should make a video showing how money has ruined Britney Spear's life. If everyone had pirated her music and not gone to her concerts, she wouldn't have the problems she has today.

    Do a public service, pirate music save the next Britney.

  7. Re:You know what? by evanbd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People on the internet are diverse. Those of us who complain about the RIAA and modern pop music aren't necessarily the same ones downloading their wares. It's no more reasonable to lump all internet users together than it is to lump all musicians or RIAA employees -- less so, in fact, seeing as it's a larger and more diverse group.

    Oh, and I have bought CDs I torrented. In fact, I've got a couple sitting in an online shopping cart waiting for another addition or two. You may find it odd, but exposure to music results in purchases.

  8. Here We Go Again by hyades1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Reefer Madness" for a new generation.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  9. Re:You know what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You are correct. People have a choice to consume the media that you produce. People using your media have the right to be paid for what it takes to produce it & to profit from it. For those who complain - the alternative is to create and share your own culture (YouTube, Jamendo etc) and make the broadcast media model irrelevant. This is far better than watching pirated Rambo XIX.

    The RIAA behavior is a separate issue. The RIAA and the various DMCA clones should not be breaching personal privacy using dubious legal arguments. This vexatious litigant and should not be using processes and economic power to intimidate ordinary people - the impact on the individual is far greater on the individual than on the RIAA and it's backers.

    The penalty for getting caught running a red light is tiny in comparison than the cost of a single copyright breach. The values that allow this is warped and way out of proportion.

  10. Re:You know what? by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think you and the brown guy are confused about how people get paid. Most people in the "entertainment industry" get a salary or hourly wage for doing their job, just like your average IT worker gets paid a certain amount for performing their job function. The amount of sales of the product in a given month has no direct impact on their paycheck, and they aren't paid a proportion of sales.

    However, if not enough people buy the product, the business starts laying off salaried staff to try to reduce their operating costs; or potentially shuts down altogether.

    So these "2c are all you'll get" comments aren't clever or insightful or even funny, they just show your ignorance.

    Whether or not we should care is another matter, of course.

  11. Re:I say this with the utmost respect by MadnessASAP · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was pretty much with you right up until the end. Being a sound technician is a real art that requires alot of dedication and practice, I gurantee you that you will not be even close the their abilities regardless of whose using what equipment in a week or even 5 years. Not to mention that alot of artists and sound technicians aren't payed what they're worth but at least the independent artists are starting to gain alot more traction and it's now starting to be feasible to be your own label.

    --
    I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
  12. Re:That solves everything! by cgenman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's true, isn't it? Your average terrorist is probably out there pirating software, cheating on their spouses, and experimenting with illegal narcotics.

    Of course, terrorists also eat, go to the bathroom, and occasionally bathe too. That's because it's what people do. Correlation does not equal causality, unless you're very well paid to believe so.

  13. It actually does solve a lot... by Serengeti · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hate to ruin the fun here... seriously I love all of you... but no where in the video were they suggesting that piracy and terrorism, murder or drugs are related.

    All that was suggested was that if officers wanted into a suspects home, but did not have enough evidence to issue a warrant on the suspected charges alone, they could use piracy as a means to get that warrant. The intent, which should be obvious by now, is to get into the house so that evidence of terrorism, drug trafficking or violent intent involving firearms might then be 'coincidentally' discovered.

    And hey... sounds like it's a great strategy. How many people do you know that haven't pirated anything at all? The police just found themselves a skeleton key.

    1. Re:It actually does solve a lot... by imemyself · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Interesting, and IANAL, but it seems like that wouldn't necessarily work real well. If mean, if you get a warrant for someone "pirating" music, the only things that they can really look at/take would be the computers, maybe some CD's, etc, right? I was under the impression, that (as some example I read put it), the police could not get a warrant to search a home for a stolen piano, and then arrest the owner because they found drugs in a cabinet, because they could not have reasonably expected to find the piano in the cabinet. Does anyone know more about this sort of thing?

      --
      Every time you post an article on Slashdot, I kill a server. Think of the servers!
    2. Re:It actually does solve a lot... by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In theory they can't, but in practice they could easily come up with an excuse, and after they found something its too late.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    3. Re:It actually does solve a lot... by ultranova · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - Adolf Hitler.

      And I'm pretty sure most other succesful dictators have had similar notions. Don't attribute to Rand what she clearly didn't invent; whether this should be considered to be to her credit or discredit is another matter.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  14. Sweden's neutral! by volpe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can see Bush figuring that attacking Sweden would be a piece of cake, seeing as how they're a neutral country with no army.

    1. Re:Sweden's neutral! by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While that might be true, it takes a while to build up an army, with a professional and experienced core to serve as the officers. You can expand an army to be 10 times the size fairly quickly but you need some core to start from and that can take up a generation to succeed. You need to train the pilots, design and acquire hardware all of which takes time in modern warfare.

      As an aside, Sweden stayed out of the first and second war by NOT being important either strategically or resource-wise, rather than some kind of political strategy (they pissed off Hitler plenty but there was really no need to do anything about it). Belgium (in both world wars) and Netherlands + Denmark + Luxembourg + Norway (in second world war) were officially neutral yet got wiped because of strategic and resource reasons.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
  15. Re:That solves everything! by Fred_A · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I thought when you said actual piracy you meant boarding freighters, killing the crew and taking their valuables. I can see how that might lead to more violent crimes. I can't.

    But then I can't really find a "more violent crime", especially since I know a number of people who have been captains or senior officers on large long haul freighters that have seen piracy up close. Even cruise ships and private small crafts such as sailboats aren't immune either in some areas.

    Piracy can get very very nasty despite the romantic image it currently carries.
    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  16. Re:That solves everything! by EzInKy · · Score: 3, Insightful


    as a content creator, maybe you can explain to me why if a potential customer gets my software and pays someone else for a pirate copy, that's bad, and if they just pirate it without paying thats ok?


    Because in the first case someone is making money off of you while in the second the second they are simply sharing information.


    This idea that non commercial theft is ok is just a pathetic justification people use for their own greed.


    Sharing information is not greed, it's quite the opposite as a matter of fact. It is a natural human trait that enables people to pass knowledge and culture from one generation to the next.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  17. Oh man you Americans... by slashdotinmyface · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Haha you Americans are so fucked (up) :-D