Slashdot Mirror


Diebold Leaks 2008 Election Results

samzenpus writes "With all the scrutiny that Diebold has received in past few years you'd think that they would be more careful but apparently due to a malfunction in some machines, they have leaked the results to the 2008 presidential race early. Hopefully this will be the nail in Diebold's coffin. Surely we have another company in this country that can run a sham election better."

47 of 196 comments (clear)

  1. end of the internet by Fusen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, embedding a flash movie directly on slashdot. Considering 90% don't RTFA this is going to be the worst /.ing that's ever happened!

    1. Re:end of the internet by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Or, not. Cause, you know, it's not an ad. And it doesn't auto-play, so it's not hurting anyone.

      I swear, some people miss no opportunity to smugly mention their ad-blocker.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    2. Re:end of the internet by orclevegam · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I swear, some people miss no opportunity to smugly mention their ad-blocker. I don't use an ad-blocker, I use a flash-blocker. The fact that it sometimes catches ads is just a bonus.
      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    3. Re:end of the internet by DirtyHerring · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They don't allow Flash here at work. It is a bummer....keeps us out of other sites too.

      Where do you work? Smart decision makers there.

    4. Re:end of the internet by v1k · · Score: 5, Funny

      Adobe.

    5. Re:end of the internet by kalirion · · Score: 4, Funny

      No-Script works well enough for me.

    6. Re:end of the internet by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 3, Funny

      I had hopped that we were still a fairly literate group of people
      Yeah, I had hopped over that hurdle two.

      OK, sorry guys, that was just lame...
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    7. Re:end of the internet by Vicarius · · Score: 2, Funny

      More to the point, why does Slashdot seem to be joining the whole "audio and video" trend? I had hopped that we were still a fairly literate group of people... if I want video and pics, I'll go to digg. I come here to read. I would prefer a transcript of a video, than watching a silent show. Yes, I'm like most of you wasting my time at work and don't want to be caught by enabling audio on my workstation.
    8. Re:end of the internet by mhall119 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs? Prefetch?
      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    9. Re:end of the internet by mhall119 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I swear, some people miss no opportunity to smugly mention their ad-blocker. What smug comment? Oh, that's right, I don't see them because I use the Smug-Block extension.
      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    10. Re:end of the internet by veganboyjosh · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't own a single television.

      I own three.

    11. Re:end of the internet by tweek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not but from a pure time wasting and proactive security standpoint, it makes perfect sense. I can't think of one site that uses flash for something that is actually productive or necessary to most core business functions. Sounds like an easy way to block the myriad video sites that pop up left and right.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    12. Re:end of the internet by KillerBob · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not but from a pure time wasting and proactive security standpoint, it makes perfect sense. I can't think of one site that uses flash for something that is actually productive or necessary to most core business functions. Sounds like an easy way to block the myriad video sites that pop up left and right.


      Been to http://www.dell.com/ lately? Or any other vendor, for that matter? Sure, the site can be done without flash... but in a business where people make buying decisions based on how something is presented, with bonus points for being "sexy", having something like well-designed and well-implemented Flash applet on the website can make a *huge* difference to your bottom line.

      You're making the mistake of thinking like an engineer, not a consumer.
      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    13. Re:end of the internet by Imsdal · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm not so sure that's the case when Diebold is invlved.

    14. Re:end of the internet by unitron · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, I had hopped over that hurdle two.

      How'd you do with hurdles one and three?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    15. Re:end of the internet by wvmarle · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't own a single television. Same for me. Mine is married.

      Wouter.
    16. Re:end of the internet by SeaFox · · Score: 5, Funny

      I just use my landlord's.

      You know she prefers you call her mom like you did when you were little.
  2. And this isn't in idle...why? by Volante3192 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Funny, probably, but does it really belong in what's supposed to be a serious section?

    1. Re:And this isn't in idle...why? by pembo13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think we would first have to argue if Politics (at least this specific form of politics) can really be considered serious in the first place.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  3. Since when was this Digg? by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I didn't realise /. had started posting links to things the submitter happened to find amusing today.

    --
    It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    1. Re:Since when was this Digg? by LarsWestergren · · Score: 4, Informative

      I didn't realise /. had started posting links to things the submitter happened to find amusing today.

      Then you honestly can't have been here very long. The foot icon appears at least a couple of times a week on the frontpage and indicates a "funny" story submission. If it displeases you, you can filter away these stories in your preferences.

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    2. Re:Since when was this Digg? by crossmr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ron paul 2008!!! digg me down haters!!!

    3. Re:Since when was this Digg? by ultranova · · Score: 4, Insightful

      every other post calling America a fascist police state.

      Yeah, it annoys me too. America is not a fascist police state; America is a plutocratic police state. The difference is that under fascism, economy booms, while under plutocracy, economy goes kaboom.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  4. It's not who votes that count by caluml · · Score: 5, Funny

    http://satirica.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/stalin_voting.jpg
    It's not who votes that count - it's who counts the votes. - Josef Stalin

    With apologies to the poor soul whose server I've linked to. :)

  5. Samzenpus is an idiot for posting this. !news by mw13068 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is not news, it doesn't matter, it's not /.

    Start spamming /. with this stupid shit at your own risk.

  6. LOL... So with 9 months to go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The dems are already preparing an excuse just in case the improbable happens and they actually manage to lose this presidential election. The sad part is that a lot of people will believe in it.

  7. Re:It's asinine to post Onion satire as news here by justkeeper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're on slashdot so your time can be wasted.

  8. wrong but that does not matter by dario_moreno · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This time the media (not Diebold) are going to have an apparently nice democrat elected, since Bush went a little too far but it should be obvious that once again it won't make any notable difference. Kucinich, Paul or Nader would have, but this would be against so many interests....

    --
    Google passes Turing test : see my journal
    1. Re:wrong but that does not matter by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do you really think those guys would have made a difference?

      Really, there not king, they need other people to agree on things,. have two parties not liking you gets exactly nothing done. Granted, getting nothing done would have made the last 7 year much better.

      Of course the media screwed Edwards. I didn't want him to win, but the media just ignored him and tried to makes it a Race/Woman thing. frankly I applaud both candidates for not rising to that bait.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:wrong but that does not matter by 0p7imu5_P2im3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't give up your vote just because the Republicrats limit you to two bad candidates. Men fought and died to get you that vote. Leaving a ballot blank is the modern day equivalent of burning the US flag.

      If you really want to show them who's boss, and prove that they cannot limit your vote, vote for a third party that offers a candidate that is closer to your values than the Republicrats. I'm not a Libertarian shill, but the Libertarians are a freedom-based compromise between the Republicrats. Personally, I was really hoping Ron Paul would run third party or independent, but that football team mentality of "my party first, the country second" runs deep. And there's also Nader, but don't vote for him unless he has enough states such that he could possibly win (same goes for the Libertarians, but they usually get enough states).

      --
      Resistance is futile. Your technological distinctiveness will be added to our own. You will become one with the morgue
    3. Re:wrong but that does not matter by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you really think those guys would have made a difference?

      In eight years, one man in that office took us from having a strong economy and reasonably decent foreign relations, to the pariah of the world with an economy so weak even the CANADIAN dollar beats our own.

      So yeah, the right person in that office could certainly go a long way toward improving things. Not to say I consider any of the named people that impressive (I liked RP, but don't know that he would have had the cooperation to even start to undo Bush's damage), but as proof of concept, you have to concede the point.

  9. Mod points with nowhere to go by kenj0418 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have mod points today -- but unfortunately theres no way to mod-down a submitter.

  10. Well, now that The Onion is being cited... by rickb928 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    /. is pretty flushed down the toilet.

    Secretly, I'm proud of the Onion gang. They succeed at being seen as legit, relevant, newsworthy, true (!), and just plain really neato. The best TV news is still the Jon Stewart stuff. Life goes on.

    Glad also to see someone else gets duped. I haven't been taken by The Onion ever, but the Washington Post has caught me a few times...

    And since when has it been a wast of OUR time to revel in the delightful agony of a fellow /.'r getting completely fooled, or fooling us in the bargain?

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  11. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  12. Before I saw the 'Onion' tags... by martinQblank · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...I had a brief moment where I seriously considered that it could, in fact, be true. Hmmm.

  13. Re:It's asinine to post Onion satire as news here by geminidomino · · Score: 5, Funny

    Guess we know who woke-and-boke this morning. In the future, hit the bong after you've posted to /. for the day. Says the guy who actually just used the 'word' "boke"
  14. Fark by _14k4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When did this site become fark? This was on _that_ page yesterday, and to top it off, did not involve an embedded flash movie.

    That's two posts in one day that have those flash movies in them. One of the reasons I read /. is because there is little network traffic during the visit. I suppose that's not very true anymore, unless I go to the text only theme.

  15. Funny excerpt by guruevi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "This country is based on the fantasy that the government is the voice of the people"

    Best quote, ever, and true as well.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  16. THIS JUST IN by Gay+for+Linux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    BREAKING NEWS STORY: Comments posted on a slashdot thread earlier today indicate its readers are a bunch of humorless, whiny fags.

    1. Re:THIS JUST IN by Toonol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. I'm a bit disappointed in my fellow Slashdot participants today. This is an obvious joke; Slashdot is not CNN, they can post jokes occasionally. That's a good thing. The flash video doesn't load and play automatically, so it's not a significant waste of bandwidth. If you are insulted at the mere suggestion of flash... well, you get insulted too easily.

  17. voting tech IS tech by jahknow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To the "why is this here on /." replies, I humbly submit the following: Please note that this IS a geek/tech-related post. Note the explicit warning of humor, as exhibited by the big monty python foot icon. If anyone takes offence (sp) at this being yet another US-centric post, well, I'll give you that, but just remember that US political and technological affairs do affect everyone -- just ask an Iraqi... or an Afghani, or an Iranian, or a Cuban, or a Vietnamese... I'm too lazy to link to the 12,000 non-humorous /. posts on the sad state of e-voting in the states, but I'm sure you've already ignored those posts once. That said, the video itself was stale, predictable Onion humor -- you really needn't read past the headline, as there's not much more too it.

    --
    ^^
  18. Re:not news to YOU maybe by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If Samzenpus viewed that, an actually thought it was a real news item then they should be immediatly banned from the internet..hell, anything with a computer.

    It does belong on /., but under humor because it was pretty damn funny.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  19. Re:The Onion on /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Take a look at the "topic" icon - that foot thingy? If you hold the mouse over it for a second or two, it'll give you a secret message about the reason the article was posted.

  20. Obama's support base goes asymtotic by caywen · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have finally devised the complex equation of Obama's increasing support, and I found that though his support is skyrocketing in Texas, it becomes asymtotic at around March 4. On that day around 2:42pm, his support goes to infinity and will form a black hole that will kill us all. Support Hillary before it's too late.

  21. Re:Samzenpus is an idiot for posting this. !news by Taevin · · Score: 5, Informative
    Instructions for those who have a anti-humour cattle prod stuck up their ass:
    1. Click the Help & Preferences link at the top of the page.
    2. Click on the Sections link under the Index subsection of the Your Preferences section.
    3. Select the Never radio button for the Entertainment category.
    4. Click the Save button.
    Congratulations, you have successfully filtered humour from your life. No longer will your boring life be terrorized by "this stupid shit."
  22. Onion Get It Right by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, the sad thing is that the Onion tends to predict things more accurately than the pundits. I mean, they even predicted how the Bush presidency would go back when it began. For instance, this article from January 17, 2001. Perhaps William Kristolnacht should write for the Onion and let some of the Onion people write serious news.

  23. Re:Samzenpus is an idiot for posting this. !news by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do you have instructions for removing the cattle prod? Because I laugh a lot, and those shocks fucking hurt!

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are