Slashdot Mirror


Wave Powered Boat to Sail From Hawaii to Japan

CaroKann writes "In the middle of May 2008, Kenichi Horie, an adventurer known for such feats as paddling a pedal powered boat 4,660 miles from Hawaii to Okinawa in 1993, will be sailing a wave powered boat from Honolulu's Hawaii Yacht Club to the Kii Channel in Japan. The boat, a 3-ton catamaran named the Suntory Mermaid II, works by virtue of the fins located at the front of the boat. These fins "generate thrust force by moving up and down like the tails of dolphins and whales and absorbing the energy of the waves." The system can propel the boat no matter which direction the waves come from. Because the wave propulsion system absorbs the energy from the waves, a passenger on the boat will experience a smooth ride. With a top speed of about 5 knots, the journey is expected to take about 2 to 3 months."

152 comments

  1. Wave powered boat by Feef+Lovecraft · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If the top speed is 5 knots, a sail would be faster at some points, I must just be missing something...

    1. Re:Wave powered boat by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You're missing
      • Sails aren't that good if the wind is against you, you have to tack whereas wave power works in all directions
      • This is a prototype, sails have had millennia to develop. Presumably efficency will increase
      • Whilst 'flat calm' does exist, waves are more prevalent than wind, less idle time
      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    2. Re:Wave powered boat by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Well, the summary does he is going to "sail" the wave-powered boat, though I don't know of a better word for driving a boat. It also says it's a catamaran which, according to wikipedia, can be sail or engine powered. What happens though when he's in completely still water? This is the 'Pacific' Ocean after all.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    3. Re:Wave powered boat by Calinous · · Score: 1

      There is a big mast that could be very well be used for sails - yet, the idea is to only use wave power.
            I wonder how this wave power will scale up...

    4. Re:Wave powered boat by MMC+Monster · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Don't forget:
      • Hybrid wave/wind powered options are possible.
      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    5. Re:Wave powered boat by raving+griff · · Score: 1

      The doldrums (near the Equator) are the only areas of the sea which are prevalently calm and flat. So long as he does not approach the Equator, he won't have much problem with flat seas.

    6. Re:Wave powered boat by Otto95 · · Score: 1

      If wave power is so great. Why does this boat have a mast on it?

    7. Re:Wave powered boat by EasyTarget · · Score: 1

      One word: redundancy.

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    8. Re:Wave powered boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Looking at a map, most of the trip would be kinda downhill if he went from Japan to Hawaii, so he should be able to coast if he went in that direction.

    9. Re:Wave powered boat by sckeener · · Score: 1

      This is a prototype, sails have had millennia to develop. Presumably efficency will increase

      that and this tech is less manpower intensive than sails.

      I could see robots doing this in the future. If the ship has trouble (or is attacked), it could take pictures/video powered by solar panels and beam them via satellite for rescue or Interpol.

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    10. Re:Wave powered boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pack plenty of Don Jose's discount microwave burritos as your rations and you can point the wind in whatever direction you want...

    11. Re:Wave powered boat by Feef+Lovecraft · · Score: 0, Redundant

      So how about a Kite instead? 3 ton isn't that heavy, a nice big power kite could supplement the craft speed really well. Then you just stick a dynamo onto the wave powered bit, a battery and an outboard electrical motor. Sorted.

    12. Re:Wave powered boat by necro81 · · Score: 2, Informative
      From the project's website:

      Under normal use the sole power source is wave energy, but the boat can also use sails or an outboard motor when entering or leaving harbor, or in case of emergencies. While cruising, the outboard motor and sails will not be used.

    13. Re:Wave powered boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you wear a belt AND suspenders.

    14. Re:Wave powered boat by somersault · · Score: 0

      Interpol HQ:

      Sir! It's those robotic holidaymakers again! They're being held by those darned robotic pirate-terrorists! They're asking for 10000 lithium polymer batteries and 30 copies of that issue of Roboman weekly featuring Natalie Portscan!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    15. Re:Wave powered boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nah. I have hands. In fact, I have two hands. There's redundancy for you.

    16. Re:Wave powered boat by srussia · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's not sailing; it's just drifting with style!

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    17. Re:Wave powered boat by Gerzel · · Score: 1

      Same reason the first steamships had masts.

    18. Re:Wave powered boat by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      You are wrong.

    19. Re:Wave powered boat by Loke+the+Dog · · Score: 1

      Sails could also be controlled by robots and computers if there was a demand for economical sailing. The problem with sails is that they're not dependable enough, if there's no wind, you're not moving. This is also true for this wave riding boat. It could be a good way to reduce fuel consumption, but it can never out right compete with screws on frieght ships.

    20. Re:Wave powered boat by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Sails aren't that good if the wind is against you, you have to tack whereas wave power works in all directions And kites are even worse.
    21. Re:Wave powered boat by Deadstick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed. Even ancient Greek and Roman triremes had hybrid propulsion: they actually covered more mileage under sail than rowing, but the oars were there when needed.

      rj

    22. Re:Wave powered boat by JCSoRocks · · Score: 2, Funny

      Natalie Portscan!? Is that the one with the sweet interface and the nice rack?

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    23. Re:Wave powered boat by davesays · · Score: 0

      It's almost a circular argument. Wind and waves are related, the second comes mostly form the first. The dead calm areas at the equator have very little wave action because of a lack of wind action (mostly, not entirely). And as far as sails being less useful into the wind because of tacking, somewhat true. But on a modern sail boat, better than trying to navigate a 5 knot boat against a current. Even if you don't put up a sail wind will still have a large effect on your net progress.

    24. Re:Wave powered boat by timeOday · · Score: 1

      What sounds interesting to me is wave (or wind) plus solar. I would imagine when the sea is at dead calm, it is usually sunny. And when the sun isn't out, it's normally windy and wavy.

    25. Re:Wave powered boat by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      Wave fin designs have been around for several years. There have even been tiny craft like canoes that get around lakes where the shifting weight of the occupant causes a swim fin like object to propel the boat.
                      But these critters have serious limits. For example the Gulf Stream has a faster current than such a system can confront. At 5mph you would effectively be stalled or being pushed backwards unless you chose to go in the same direction as the stream.
                      It goes without saying that electricity can be generated by similar designs.

    26. Re:Wave powered boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because coal is expensive, and the engine has lousy range?

    27. Re:Wave powered boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your link agrees with everything he said.

      YOU are wrong, and a cunt.

    28. Re:Wave powered boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if we only knew what he was wrong about.

    29. Re:Wave powered boat by ArAgost · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid to tell you that not all nights are dark and stormy. (Well, most are quite dark)

    30. Re:Wave powered boat by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting that there are a lot of storms out on the open ocean, and during a storm, this baby does 30-40 knots. ;-)

      In all seriousness, it would be interesting to see if this system could increase the speed of a ship running under some other form of power, all while increasing the smoothness of the ride. It would also be interesting to see if the power it generates can scale up with the weight of the ship.

    31. Re:Wave powered boat by quincunx55555 · · Score: 1

      I've seen some comments about combining this tech with other current methods, like sail. However, I'm thinking the synchronization of the two could create difficulties. If you're sailing, would the energy created by the "wave fins" overcome the drag produced by them? Would any propulsion from the "wave fins" give you intermittent spurts forward, making the sailing less efficient?

      My first thought would be that any movement forward would render the "wave fins" as useless, but as long as there is up-and-down motion going on, it appears that it will still add forward movement.

    32. Re:Wave powered boat by IhuntCIA · · Score: 1

      Have no idea, but, I would fill and empty mast to adjust rocking frequency of the boat to achieve better conversion of wave energy ( rocking ) to forward motion. I guess that is why mast is so thick yet it has no sails on it.

    33. Re:Wave powered boat by JonathanR · · Score: 1

      Well, the Japanese are renown for their skills at drifting with style.

    34. Re:Wave powered boat by Hucko · · Score: 1

      Or you could .. you know ... pull the 'wave fins' up just like you do when you pull the sail down when you don't want to move.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    35. Re:Wave powered boat by name*censored* · · Score: 1

      Ok, so there's going to be some deadtime. But think of all the extra options a second power source is going to give you - you could go at twice the speed in good conditions, OR you could utilise one propulsion source and store the other for deadtime.

      What I would be REALLY interested in is selling a "spiderarm" upgrade for regular boats. The tip of the arm could be completely bouyant, the shaft of the arm inflexible, and the head of the arm could be attached to the ship via a hinge, with the reciprocating "piston" action generating energy for the motor (either by converting to electricity and then back to kinetic, or a mechanical apparatus). With 2 arms in a "V" configuration (the boat itself is the third point of reference), no regular wave could raise all three points at once (thus not harvesting the wave's energy). The only problem I can see is that each arm might not produce much power; but since the "spider-arm" itself would be cheap enough to produce (all you need is a long stiff pole, a large, empty plastic container, a hinge and duct tape), you could easily overcome this by having dozens of arms. Super-tanker ships could really clean up on this technology, thanks to their massive surface area.

      --
      Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
    36. Re:Wave powered boat by quincunx55555 · · Score: 1

      If it negatively effects the sail performance, sure. I was just wondering if it would. Instead of interference, the two may work together well since the boat would pitch and roll less. Maybe the boat would pitch and roll less, but jerk back and forth more. It would be interesting playing with the different ratios to find out what works best.

    37. Re:Wave powered boat by somersault · · Score: 1

      I've heard she loves to be cable tied in place, and prefers any peripherals to be plugged in from behind. You need to be earthed if you're going to work on her internals though.

      --
      which is totally what she said
  2. Future journey times. by owlnation · · Score: 5, Funny

    the journey is expected to take about 2 to 3 months
    Probably still faster than getting through airport check-in and security.
    1. Re:Future journey times. by louks · · Score: 1

      The boat, a 3-ton catamaran named the Suntory Mermaid II


      Sure that's a long time, but at least it's Suntory Time.
    2. Re:Future journey times. by neuromancer23 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Also, regaining your land legs is easier from sea legs than it is from cavity search legs.

  3. Gold Medal by oodaloop · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Woohoo!! First Post! I actually tried to RTFA, but the link doesn't seem to want to load at work. If the max speed is only 5 knots, I'm skeptical there'll be much of a market for it. Can it be incorporated into power boats as a means to conserve energy and stabilize the ride?

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:Gold Medal by piemcfly · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Market possibilities? This is the same guy that sailed across the pacific ocean on a boat made from recycled beer kegs.
      Isn't it an enormous feat already that somebody comes up with this idea and makes it work?
      It might be marketeable in the future... just like almost every innovative technology. Right now it's a feat to marvel at though.

    2. Re:Gold Medal by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Isn't it an enormous feat already that somebody comes up with this idea and makes it work? Absolutely. I think this initiative is amazing, as well as the tech behind the propulsion of this catamaran.
      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    3. Re:Gold Medal by MemoryAid · · Score: 1

      Market possibilities? This is the same guy that sailed across the pacific ocean on a boat made from recycled beer kegs.

      The guy's a genius; beer kegs have already saturated the market for bulk beer sales. All he has to do is make a boat out of it and it sells!

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    4. Re:Gold Medal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, next they need a wave motion gun

  4. Says it'll also have solar power by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

    "A set of eight solar panels produces 560 watts to run the navigation lights, ham radio, satellite phone and PC."

    If he's going to have a PC on board I wonder if he'll have Internet hookup via the Satellite phone. And if so if he'll be posting a blog to detail his journey. That would be pretty sweet.

    Does anyone know if he has a personal web site regarding his voyage ? TFA doesn't mention one.

    1. Re:Says it'll also have solar power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also has engine power

      From TFA "Outboard Motor Reserved for extreme emergencies." As in arriving at the target point before the sharks eat the "3 millimeter aluminum alloy that is the outer hull" (from the TFA).

    2. Re:Says it'll also have solar power by The_Wilschon · · Score: 5, Funny
      A blog of the voayge! That does sound really exciting! I can almost see it now...

      Captain's log, seadate 52145.7: There are lots of waves out here. There is also lots of water. The boat keeps going forward.

      Captain's log, seadate 52271.2: More waves. Also more water. Still on the boat.

      Captain's log, seadate 52361.9: Saw a fish this morning. Most exciting thing all week. It had fins. Also a tail.
      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    3. Re:Says it'll also have solar power by GigG · · Score: 1

      Day 5.... 120 miles further out in the middle of no where.
      Day 6.... 120 miles further out in the middle of no where.
      ...

      --
      Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
    4. Re:Says it'll also have solar power by mitchplanck · · Score: 1

      The only reason he would need Internet on this long voyage is for porn. Gotta have something to do.

    5. Re:Says it'll also have solar power by quincunx55555 · · Score: 1
  5. Interesting way of transportation by Daimanta · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am intrigued by transport using the power of nature. I myself am working on moving a ship by "catching" the wind with a large upright "surface" altough I don't exactly know how I am going to contruct this "surface". I was personally thinking about using a soft fabric and bind it to a pole. I am also testing if multiple surfaces work better than one.

    I'll keep you informed if I continue to the next fases of my daring contruction plan.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    1. Re:Interesting way of transportation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a great idea, I suggest you call it "sail" or something like that.

    2. Re:Interesting way of transportation by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about somehow exploiting the explosive chemical energy in our gasoline reserves, but I'm totally stumped on how to convert an explosive expansion of gas into torque..

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    3. Re:Interesting way of transportation by Daimanta · · Score: 1

      This sounds very interesting. I highly suggest putting fixed cannons on the back of your transportation vehicle and firing them in a steady interval. Any other way way would be pure insanity!

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    4. Re:Interesting way of transportation by bartappleous · · Score: 3, Funny

      Insanity... I'm thinking dolphin tow rope, and fish launchers. You see you launch the fish out ahead of the dolphins and that's how you steer the boat. Oh and it can easily scale up too! Think Blue Whale tow and krill launcher. I'm not twelve. Really. I think it would be fun, but PETA would be all over me on that one. But the Blue Whale Loves pulling the boat.

    5. Re:Interesting way of transportation by bartappleous · · Score: 1

      Sperm whale and Squid launcher.

    6. Re:Interesting way of transportation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late... I've just patented it.

    7. Re:Interesting way of transportation by bartappleous · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great white and or Orca tow plus sea lion pup launcher. Now I am done for.

    8. Re:Interesting way of transportation by bartappleous · · Score: 2, Funny

      Olympic swimmer tow and gold medal launcher. You can even use steroids to improve performance.

    9. Re:Interesting way of transportation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cuban refuge tow, but it only works if you are going to Miami.

    10. Re:Interesting way of transportation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This might seem a little pedantic, but a sail does not 'catch' the wind any more than an aircrafts wing does. Not even spinnakers. They are all aerofoils used to generate lift which drives a boat forward via the mast.

    11. Re:Interesting way of transportation by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Aye, but you shall need many a good man to tend to such a ship, good sir. We shall need a method of obtaining such men in an unscrupulous manner. Perhaps, with the aid of a local grog establishment we can deceive these men into drinking themselves into a stupor, then kidnapping them into the service. But we shall need a city to function of as our base of operations. Perhaps somewhere in the Orient.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    12. Re:Interesting way of transportation by fuzznutz · · Score: 2, Funny

      This sounds very interesting. I highly suggest putting fixed cannons on the back of your transportation vehicle and firing them in a steady interval. Any other way way would be pure insanity!

      My God, Mr. Scott. You've invented impulse engines. Now get started on that warp drive.
    13. Re:Interesting way of transportation by OglinTatas · · Score: 1

      I'll keep you informed if I continue to the next fases of my daring contruction plan.

      You misspelled faeces. Funny, I do all my best thinking on the crapper too.
    14. Re:Interesting way of transportation by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      Google the Orion project; immense thrust from nuclear bombs. Using existing technology we could get up to 0.3c, and get millions of tonnes of payload up into space (something that is simply impossible with conventional rockets).

      The problem is nuclear fallout of course, estimates are that ~10 more people would die from cancer per launch, but if cleaner nukes could be devised it would blow all other methods of space travel out of the water.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    15. Re:Interesting way of transportation by ShatteredArm · · Score: 1

      estimates are that ~10 more people would die from cancer per launch
      But we could get up to 0.3c. Clearly, the benefits outweigh the costs.
    16. Re:Interesting way of transportation by icebrain · · Score: 1

      I don't think you'll ever see an Orion operating from surface launch, but it is very viable as a deep-space propulsion system. You could also launch tritium pellets, ignite them with lasers, and travel that way (saves the problem of using up all our uranium...)

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    17. Re:Interesting way of transportation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a bartappleous tow and a mod point launcher? It's really pretty simple - you throw a couple of mod points out there and bartappleous keeps chasing after them no matter what.

      Now, if only I could figure out a way to mount that to a boat . . .

    18. Re:Interesting way of transportation by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      Honestly I don't know if you're being sarcastic.. This could allow humanity to realistically colonize other planets.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    19. Re:Interesting way of transportation by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Your idea has really impressed the whole gang here, and we would be interested in subscribing to your newsletter.

    20. Re:Interesting way of transportation by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Think Blue Whale tow and krill launcher. Will the payload be contained in some sort of object? Might we be talking about a kinetic krill vehicle?
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    21. Re:Interesting way of transportation by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      I for one volunteer you and your family to be amongst those people who croak painfully and horribly after a protracted radiation-induced illness. But I offer 0.001c extra in exchange. So its a done deal, right?

    22. Re:Interesting way of transportation by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      If you're offering me a 10/6,000,000,000 chance of me and my family being amongst the people who croak painfully and horribly after a protracted radiation-induced illness, then you bet it's a done deal. (But the difference is 0.03c, and about 8 million tons of payload that could save humanity.)

      Some people have sacrificed their lives for the space program directly, would I sacrifice my life 10/6,000,000,000% of the time? If 10/6,000,000,000 sounds unreasonable to you then you need to learn the odds that you'll get run over by a drunk driver, or the odds of getting cancer from smoking. If you're a smoker then your second hand smoke is statically far more dangerous, and your second hand smoke doesn't have any chance of potentially saving humanity.

      These black and white "if something will die then we cannot do it" is the reason millions of lives aren't saved through things like stem cell research or animal testing. Black and white ethics like those presented in your post are the cause of a lot of evil.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    23. Re:Interesting way of transportation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A vessel running before the wind is essentially catching the breeze in its sail and being dragged along by it.

  6. Let's do the math by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 2, Interesting
    let's try to calculate how man horsepower you can get from this scheme.
    • Let's assume they have a 550 pound float at the end of a xx-foot beam.
    • And assume there's a three-foot wave going by every five seconds.
    • You probably don't wnt to be out in a 3-ton catamaran in much bigger waves that that.
    • And assume you have some differential flotation going on so there's three feet of motion between the float and the boat.
    • So you have 550 pounds moving 3/5 of a foot per second.
    • That's a not very whopping 0.6 horsepower.
    • Just about enough to move the float at a knot or two through the water.
    • Of course it would be easier to just cut loose the float.
    1. Re:Let's do the math by doooooosh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, for one, the according to this, the average wave height between Hawaii and Japan is closer to 10 feet, with a period of ~7.5 seconds. I doubt there's 10 feet of motion available in the fin of the boat, but it starts to account for the larger amount of energy available, and the higher speeds claimed. I'm far from a an expert in anything, really, so I'll leave it to someone else to make a better guess at the math.

    2. Re:Let's do the math by Deadstick · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's some confusion here about how the system works...it's not floats and beams.

      The effect that makes it possible is that the vertical motion of water under waves progressively decreases with increasing depth. The vanes are supported by two streamlined struts that stick down several feet below the boat. As the boat rises on the front side of a wave, the bottom of the strut assembly moves up at the same rate as the boat, but the water at that depth is not rising as fast. Therefore, the vanes attached to the struts are being dragged upward relative to the water around them.

      The vanes are hinged forward of center, so as they're dragged up they rotate to an upward slant until they hit a stop; then they act as a kind of propeller blade, generating a net forward force. As the boat goes down the backside of the wave, they rotate to a downward slant and again you get a forward force.

      I built a model of one of these as a kid...worked remarkably well.

      rj

    3. Re:Let's do the math by Locklin · · Score: 1

      I wonder how well this scales. If the boat is required to "bob" with the waves, I doubt it would be a very usefull mechanism for larger craft.

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
    4. Re:Let's do the math by odie_q · · Score: 1

      Surely, the craft itself doesn't need to bob? A large ship sitting more or less motionless on the water could have floats on beams sliding up and down along the sides of the hull. The fins would be attached to these beams.

      Perhaps a more complex power transmission would be useful on that scale, generating electricity.

      --
      ...ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    5. Re:Let's do the math by MITguy21 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On a really small scale you can "make your own waves" -- see the Pogo Foil. I rode it once, lots of fun. http://www.ocean.washington.edu/people/faculty/parker/pogo_foil.htm

    6. Re:Let's do the math by lgbarker · · Score: 1

      Interesting calculations but your assumptions weren't made for the Pacific. I suspect that you'd see 8-12' swells out there not counting the wind waves. Also, catamarans are much lighter than you think. Based on Wharram designs, a 31' weighs 3k lbs without cargo and a 38' weights 6600. Either could cross the ocean, especially if this guy is into adventure.

  7. Smuggler's dream by gregor-e · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can see modified craft like this becoming automated, slow mules for smugglers. Since there is no need for a sail, they can ride low, leaving almost no visible, radar or sonar signature. Just put a generator and some electronics for navigation, and you've got a virtually undetectable smuggle-bot.

    1. Re:Smuggler's dream by spectrokid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and when the Godfather asks when his next shipment of snow is due, you answer: "somewhere between 2 and 3 months from now, just keep on checking that beach, man!".

      --

      10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

    2. Re:Smuggler's dream by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Or worse, yet, it's a dream for outsourcers. Scaling this would allow to move natural resources around the planet at virtually no cost. So the dream of high-paying heavy industry jobs would be gone. Worse? Better? Depends on your politics, I guess. Neil Stephenson actually figured it would be the balloons that would do the trick. Maybe at some point they will.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    3. Re:Smuggler's dream by SirMeliot · · Score: 2, Informative

      This somewhat similar device should suit your coke smuggling requirements. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7234544.stm

    4. Re:Smuggler's dream by Calinous · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sonar signature? Check, as close to nothing as possible (you might still have transients if the moving equipment starts to squeak).
      Radar signature? If you make it entirely from plastics (or at least the hull), you could get that
      Heat signature? The surface of the boat will heat/cool faster than the surrounding water. But if you put a generator on it, there will probably be a heat signature.

    5. Re:Smuggler's dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't take much boat above the surface to get picked up on radar. And something this slow would be easy to intercept once you knew where it was. Having said that, I wonder if this could be the basis for a super-quiet propulsion system for submarines or other ships where speed could be sacrificed in exchange for silence.

    6. Re:Smuggler's dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Radar signature? If you make it entirely from plastics (or at least the hull), you could get that

      Sailboats are already so hard to detect on radar that it's a problem. Most sailboats have radar reflectors installed in order to be seen by bigger vessels. One would think that the aluminum mast would suffice but since it's round it doesn't. The reflectors are ridiculously small compared with the mast but they have numerous sharp edges, which make them visible (my boat is 22 ft with a 33 ft mast but the radar reflector is just 2 ft).

    7. Re:Smuggler's dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, but you can't make the Kessel Run in less than twelve parsecs with that.

    8. Re:Smuggler's dream by Calinous · · Score: 1

      The only chance for radar detection would come from an overhead radar - the visible horizon for something as low in the water (the area where it could be detected too) is no larger than a few miles.
            And surveillance, airborne radar probably are much better than the big ship mounted counterparts - yet, they might not suffice.

    9. Re:Smuggler's dream by Loke+the+Dog · · Score: 1

      No, it could not move resources at no cost. Time really is money in logistics.

      Having stuff sitting on the seas means you're not getting paid for stuff you've already produced. Constantly having 3 months of production at sea is much more expensive than paying for the fuel of a regular cargo ship. And this is not even taking into account all the products that would get spoiled or go out of fashion in 3 months.

    10. Re:Smuggler's dream by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Since there is no need for a sail, they can ride low, leaving almost no visible, radar or sonar signature

      Do any smugglers now use actual sails? Radar was designed to detect modern ships, not sailing ones.

    11. Re:Smuggler's dream by superwiz · · Score: 1

      First, I am talking about natural resources -- not end products. Few of the end products would ever need to come back because those who provide natural resources are generally poorer than those who manufacture. Second, you miscalcuated when you said that you would always have to wait for 3 months. If a steady stream of supply is established where this is done, then the 3 months delay would only occur once. And the cost of one 3 months delay spread over an ever-increasing period of savings goes to zero as time goes to infinity. Third, natural resources (oil, ores, wood) would not spoil over a period of 3 months. As a matter of fact, let's be honest the route to keep an eye on is not Hawaii to Japan. It is west coast to China. That's 6 months (assuming same levels of engine/generator efficiencies as in this model). Still, a 6 months one time delay is nothing.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    12. Re:Smuggler's dream by icebrain · · Score: 1

      But all the nice shiny metal bits (masts, stays, bolts, cleats, etc) reflect radar, so your sailboat is still visible.

      There's nothing intrinsic in radar that recognizes age; even old sailing ships would still be somewhat visible on radar. Stealth is as much dependent on shape as materials, and big things perpendicular to the radar (especially when made of metal) are about as unstealthy as you get.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    13. Re:Smuggler's dream by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      I have trouble with this concept as well. Unfortunately it is growing increasingly popular in the business world. The attitude is: I have $10m worth of whatever sitting unpaid for. Every day that whatever sits there, I could have made $10m * 15% / 365 = $4,110 (use whatever the actual cost of capitol for your business)

      I don't know how true this is, but it is a very strong force in the business world. I personally think there are other factors that weigh more, such as the cost of running out or being unable to fill unexpected large orders, or in this case having drastically lower delivery costs.

      Whatever the case, most businesses have been working like crazy to reduce inventory-days very close to zero. It's truly crazy with say carmakers, who have the door handles delivered seconds before they are installed. It seems idiotic to me to be that tight. If a truck tips over you have to stop the whole line. Oh well, at least they aren't paying to store door handles.

      Anyway, no big business would look on this setup fondly. They would choke on the fact you have these valuable commodities sitting unpaid for in all these boats all the time.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    14. Re:Smuggler's dream by Loke+the+Dog · · Score: 1

      The three months is not a problem because of the delay, its a problem because stocks are always expensive.

      Say you make iron ore. You produce the ore, put it on a ship and send it to the smelter. If it takes 3 months, that means you'll pay for the production in January but will not get paid for the ore until April. While at sea, the ore does nothing for you. It's like lending the value of the ore to someone and not getting interest. If the speed of delivery increases, the amount of ore that's just sitting around, doing nothing for your company is reduced, and that means more profit.

      This is why companies always strive to have as small stocks as possible. Its not because warehouses are expensive or anything like that, its because keeping stuff is in itself expensive, because it doesn't give any yield.

    15. Re:Smuggler's dream by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Presumably there is a balance though. Recently I saw an article (no link, it was a dead-tree paper) saying that for the first time a freight train had been run from China to Germany, which was much quicker than the sea-shipping time, but also more expensive. It was cheaper than flying though. If speed was so important this would have been done years ago. There's some stuff people fly, some stuff goes by train, and some stuff by sea -- presumably, there's some stuff that's fine going really slowly by sea too.

    16. Re:Smuggler's dream by sammyF70 · · Score: 1

      I think you're misjudging smuggler priorities. A few months ago a couple was arrested in the UK because they built boats for smugglers. They were using rigif-hulled inflatable boats equipped with eight time 250-horsepower outboarders .

      Sounds to me like the diametrical opposite to the wave powered craft's concept.

      --
      "DRM is like the Ford Pinto: it's a smooth ride, right up the point at which it explodes and ruins your day."-C.Doctorow
    17. Re:Smuggler's dream by superwiz · · Score: 1

      You are thinking too concretely about the present-day business model. Presumably, it exists because it is most economical under the current technological conditions. If technological conditions make a different model more economical, market players will emerge to take advantage of it and they will become more efficient the players who didn't take advantage of it. The players in this case would be the shipping companies and insurance companies. The ownership of the ore does not need to be retained by those who use it. As a matter of fact, the end-point manufacturers probably buy futures contracts on the ore that they plant to use 3 months from now anyway. This creates a profit opportunity for a shipper to take advantage of high fuel prices and to lease these new boats in the hopes that the long term flat delivery cost (leasing and operating no-fuel ships) will save more than the value of fuel spent during the same time by competing shippers. To be clear, 6 months is only 20% of 6 years (assuming the return trip also takes 6 months). So if the total value of owning 1 shipment of ore for 6 months does not exceed 20% of the savings on fuel of the 6 shipments that can be made in 6 years, then the enteprice at least breaks even. Any savings better than that make it profitable.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    18. Re:Smuggler's dream by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      What makes you think such a vessel wouldn't have a GPS and an uplink device to report it's location?

  8. Timing is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article is dated February and the article states he would be sailing this month. If he was sailing in May he would arrive in the middle of the typhoon season.

  9. versus fossil fuels by Kohath · · Score: 1

    the journey is expected to take about 2 to 3 months

    Wow, that's pretty good. How long does it take in a boat powered by fossil fuels?

    1. Re:versus fossil fuels by Don853 · · Score: 1

      Probably two to three times that fast for a typical cargo ship.

      The SS United States was the fastest, or one of the fastest, non-nuclear ships and could sustain 35 knots on fossil fuels but is currently gathering rust in South Philly.

    2. Re:versus fossil fuels by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      I read about this in Popular Science a month ago. I think it said it takes about a month.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    3. Re:versus fossil fuels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About a week.

      Takes two weeks for a ship to travel from China to Vancouver BC.

    4. Re:versus fossil fuels by quincunx55555 · · Score: 1

      This site, about his boat, says a typical petroleum fueled voyage would be one month.

    5. Re:versus fossil fuels by Matrix14 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, this is about as fast as you go sailing in a boat that size.

  10. Hey. That's a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice Boat.

    (Sorry. Obligatory.) Here's the link for newbies: http://www.jbox.com/PRODUCT/SHIRT-BOAT1

  11. Between Smart And Genius? Orders of Magnitude by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is just a brilliant idea! The boat is propelled no matter the direction of the waves, and the side effect being that the boat is mostly insulated from the wave motion? How f'n brillian is that! As I have always said, the "difference between Smart and Genius is not just a few iffy percentage points, it's orders of magnitude.

    1. Re:Between Smart And Genius? Orders of Magnitude by Deadstick · · Score: 1
      This is just a brilliant idea!

      Brilliant yes, new no...

      http://www.rexresearch.com/boats/1boat.htm#wave

      rj

    2. Re:Between Smart And Genius? Orders of Magnitude by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a shame that kind of thing has never been commercially exploited. At 70 miles per hour, you could get across the Atlantic in two days. Not fast enough for business travel, but I wouldn't mind a relaxing two day sea voyage as an alternative to 7 hours on a plane. Given some bandwidth and a reasonably comfortable cabin I could work en route.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  12. waving by bandersnatch · · Score: 2, Funny

    When he leaves, he always waves goodbye

    1. Re:waving by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 2, Funny

      When he leaves, he always waves goodbye Or does he wave "aloha"?

      That would double the meaning...but does it double the amount? Will he go 2 times faster? If he paints it red will it go 3 times faster?

      These are just the kinds of things real daredevils and, dare I say, geniuses (tm) of our day and age experiment with.

      That and lightening bolt stickers. Which frankly, I'm too afraid of experimenting with on my own vehicles, lest I break free from the earth's gravitational pull and hit the sun.

      Maybe if I go at night...
      --
      Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
  13. Also called... by Thanshin · · Score: 1

    Water powered boat? It's a surfboard!

    Ok, a multi-directional surfboard.

  14. Propulsion for artificial islands by Phoenix666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saw something on the Discovery Channel a long time ago where Ballard proposed artificial islands. Wave-propulsion would be an ideal way to move the beasts around.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  15. Taking it to dry land by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wake me up when they have an asphalt-powered car.

  16. So Japan has developed the Wave Motion Engine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Somehow, this doesn't come as a surprise.

  17. Long Journey Time by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 1

    With a top speed of about 5 knots, the journey is expected to take about 2 to 3 months. With a voyage that long, I hope he brings a lot of porn.
    1. Re:Long Journey Time by BigJClark · · Score: 1


      Ergo, the computer :)

      --

      Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
    2. Re:Long Journey Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Takes, not brings. It makes a difference.

      http://www.businesswritingtips.com/wbwt/tip152.htm

  18. WTF? by neuromancer23 · · Score: 1

    If it's wave powered, why is he sailing it?

  19. same problem as wind power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if the wind dies, chances are the water will be calm...either way the boat won't be moving! btw, 5mph isn't bad when compared to a sailboat which may need to tack to get to its destination...8 knots max hull speed of a sailboat is reduced when you have to constantly change course to get to your destination

  20. Re:watery Maxwells Daemon ? by Goaway · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I'm sure they never tested even once if the idea works before they set out.

    (PS: Waves aren't the same as ambient heat.)

  21. Capital cost of the ship? by 2901 · · Score: 1

    It has a fairly complex mechanism, so it will be expensive to build and maintain. Worse, it is slow. You get paid per delivery; slow means fewer deliveries between interest payments and repair bills.

    1. Re:Capital cost of the ship? by superwiz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Again, if a steady stream is established, it would be a one time delay. Just picture one ship taking off every week and one arriving every week. It would be an essentially self-propelled pipeline. Only the initial delivery would be 6 months from the initial arrival. Ie, this pipe would have high bandwidth but also a high latency. Spare the "tube" jokes, please (been done). As for reliability, if there is money to be made in making these things reliable, they will be made reliable. The only reason that cars are not made more reliable is that there is money in servicing them.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    2. Re:Capital cost of the ship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People don't buy and sell resources in a steady stream.

    3. Re:Capital cost of the ship? by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      I thought of a better way to explain this.

      Let's say that a big version of this boat costs $100m. You want to buy 24 of them to have a pipe. That's $2.4b, and you have to add in the value of the ore or whatever you are shipping. You only have to buy the ships once (ignoring depreciation) but you have to pay for them up front, and that is an eternal cost from the pov of the company. They could have built a mine which would be providing income for many years with that $2.4b55

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    4. Re:Capital cost of the ship? by superwiz · · Score: 1

      No? When was the last time you showed at McDonald's and were told that they were out of food? The market perfects the delivery system. Manufacturers plan how much resources they'll use based (among other things) on the value of futures contracts. So, yes, they do buy them in a steady stream. The extractors of resources extract them based on the futures prices as well. This will just create another efficiency-increasing player: the slow shipper. Futures market exists precisely to eliminate disrepencies in demand and supply.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    5. Re:Capital cost of the ship? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      , if a steady stream is established,

      So now you're talking about a steady stream? Putting another $10M of goods/resources out on one of these things each day? That sounds like it is getting to be a really HEAVY supply chain. You're 'floating $300M worth of stuff at any one time, if it's a 30 day trip.

    6. Re:Capital cost of the ship? by superwiz · · Score: 1

      So now you're talking about a steady stream? Putting another $10M of goods/resources out on one of these things each day? That sounds like it is getting to be a really HEAVY supply chain. You're 'floating $300M worth of stuff at any one time, if it's a 30 day trip. Alright, I'll agree to divide the skin of the bear which has yet to be caught (since the boat does not yet exist). The early stage chain could be a ship leaving once a week. Or even once a month. And then arriving (after 6 months) once a week (or once a month if that's the choice). The whole point of slow shipping scheme is to eliminate shipping cost by increasing upfront cost. Isn't that a familiar business model in natural resources exploration? Exploration and prospecting takes a long time, but it is tolerated because a steady stream of supply is assumed to be possible after the initial cost is paid. Going along with your assumption, $10 million a month (or even a week) is either $60 mil or $260 mil. But that's not the loss. It's just the amount tied up ONCE. More precisely, the average of that amount is tied up for 6 months. So it's either $30 million or $130 million. Again, only once -- not perpetually. This is hardly a significant amount for a country like China. Heck, it's probably not a significant amount for a country like Vietnam. But China is more likely to attempt the scheme since they are the most in need of resources and the least likely to become victims of piracy.
      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  22. Sorry, already done in the 1930's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read an article from a late 1920's or 1930's popular science that described the mechanism quite accurately. It even had a model you could build using parts from old (I mean pre-plastics old) ice trays (used to make ice cubes) that were common until the early 1980s. And the article talked about a pre WW1 vintage "ingenious mechanism" that worked like this.

  23. I still don't get how it works. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone with knowledge of hydrodynamics care to explain?

    So the waves move these fins up and down. Ignoring the fact that fins are under the surface and waves are, as far as I understand, a pretty much surface phenomenon - the question still remains. Where is the propulsion? This is no different than placing an object under water - even if it is being pushed up and down, it is also being pushed backwards by those same waves at their own speed. At the same time - I see no reason for the object to create any thrust of it's own. It just bobs there?

    I guess I must be missing something - but what?

  24. Interesting facts about boats and cruisers by mclearn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At 3 tons, this boat is very light. A 3 ton boat can be flipped very easily by a rough wave. Coupled with the fact that this is a catamaran, you have a boat that is equally as stable upside down as it is righted. Our boat is 12 tons without food and equipment (we have about 1.5 tons of spare parts and tools alone!) -- 8 tons of this is keel weight. It cannot flip over and stay upside down (unless the keel breaks off).

    As for the stmt that says it will absorb the energy of the wave making for a smooth ride: don't believe it. That's like saying your knees can absorb the energy of your uneven surface. If there is more energy than can be absorbed, you will experience a rough time standing up. Same thing applies here. Do you know how much energy is in a wave? Think about the Tsunami on Boxing Day 2005. Think about wave-absorbing power plants. The amplitude of the wave doesn't even matter: it's a combination of amp. and freq. I've been in waves that are 60 feet tall, but they're 500 feet apart. This makes for a smooth, duck-like, enjoyable, infinity view when you crest, and a rather enclosing feel when you trough. :-)

    Interesting facts: 5 knots is quite slow, but manageable. A knot is about 1.8 km/hour, so we're talking about 9 km/h which is actually slower than a human can run. Captain Cook sailed around the world at about 2.5 knots. He literally went around at walking speed.

    As an aside, you can always tell the difference between the cruiser boat and the bay-sailer simply by the sheer amount of shit attached to every surface. :-) Also, look at the size and number of anchors. If there are two or more anchors: cruiser. If the anchor looks like it should be grounding the USS Enterprise: cruiser.

  25. Semi-serious response by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    I am sorry to rain on your parade, but while your idea is very good for leisure transport it is not so good for trade. Unfortunately owing to the tendency of the wind to blow in more or less one direction in different latitudes at different times of year, you will have to do a bit more than that. You will need to work out a routing system for global transport that takes account of wind and tide, and still have to deal with the minor issue that you may find voyages are unduly delayed because the wind fails to blow at all for extended periods.

    Waves are more consistent, which is why this is ingenious. Unfortunately they can also come in pretty big sizes, which may cause trouble. This thing won't be visiting the Bay of Fundy, or for that matter the Mediterranean, any time soon.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  26. Rime of the Ancient Mariner Wisdom by louzer · · Score: 1

    Down dropped the breeze, the sails dropped down,
    'Twas sad as sad could be;
    And we did speak only to break
    The silence of the sea!

    All in a hot and copper sky,
    The bloody sun, at noon,
    Right up above the mast did stand,
    No bigger than the moon.

    Day after day, day after day,
    We stuck, nor breath nor motion;
    As idle as a painted ship
    Upon a painted ocean.

    Water, water, every where,
    And all the boards did shrink;
    Water, water, every where,
    Nor any drop to drink.

    I don't think the waves are strong enough at the equator.
    --
    Heroes die once, cowards live longer.
  27. Does anyone else remember Gausefin? by jamrock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember reading an article in Popular Mechanics or Popular Science back in the mid to late seventies about an experimental wave-powered boat named "Gausefin". What stuck with me all these years was how cool the craft looked. It was a sleek monohull with a low deckhouse, not a catamaran like Suntory Mermaid II. Imagine the dream-like shape of a sailing yacht, but without the masts or sails. The fins that drove the vessel were flexible, and were the only moving parts of the propulsion system; there were no hinges or springs.

    Does anyone else remember the Gausefin, or have any information about what happened to this craft? I haven't even been able to find it with Google, and I'm beginning to wonder if I imagined the whole thing.

    1. Re:Does anyone else remember Gausefin? by LordVorp · · Score: 1

      I remember a similar story on that PBS show with Alan Alda, around 1999 or so... and it was intriguing and I have tried to find out more since, with no luck... I couldn't even find it in the archives of the show.

      but FYI I did a Google search for 'gausfin' and got one hit, a pdf of an issue of "Human Power" from 1998. However, it only mentions it once: "Another way to pick up energy to rival what a pedaler provides is to exploit wave action. An experimental craft called the Gausfin achieved 4 to 5 knots in a moderate chop."

      ... Ah-HAH, a search for "17-v5n3-1986.pdf" finds another issue of the same magazine, that shows something that looks alot like what I remember from that show, but again no details.

      /me sighs

  28. Call Greenpeace by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great, but what happens when we use up all the waves?!? This is an environmental catastrophe waiting to happen.

  29. Re: undo moderation by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

    In this scenario the entire boat is the float.
    the boat was then acting against a fin under water, that fin is held down by all the weight of the water above it (or held up by the water below it)

    in the wave pushing up situation, the fin is angled so that it has a slope where a few inches of rise, over a few feet of run.
    So in order for the boat to move up a few inches, it must move forward a few feet at the same time. This fin then flips into the downward position once the pressure swaps directions so then for every few inches the boat moves back down the ship must still move forward a few more feet.

    since water is relatively incompressible. Still the fin has to be sized appropriately so water can't more easily circulate around it rather than over it.

    my mental math says thats where all the springs come into being, their would be too much energy present for the materials used, that it would immediately break the connections between boat and fin, without some relief.

    at a minimum you would have the equivalent power of the entire mass of water displaced by the entire boat through the wave, thats ignoring the likely equal power of surface tension that must be overcome to move in any direction, relative to the surf (you will have a suction effect between the boat and the water, in addition to the weight involved.)

  30. Confusion about the date by CaroKann · · Score: 1

    There is some conflicting information about the exact day the voyage will begin. Some sites state the middle of May and others state the middle of March. According to this article in The Japan Times, Kenichi Horie stated Wednesday that the voyage will begin on March 16. My apologies about the confusion.

    1. Re:Confusion about the date by tv_dinners · · Score: 1

      Well of course there is.

      March is when the wave powered board "leaves" for its voyage. May is when the cargo ship containing the wave powered boat leaves for the same destination.

  31. Re:Hahaha by shentino · · Score: 1

    I hear that from chinese folks.

    I hear "wakime honsaitemo makimukemotosande desdensai saiyan dbz pokemon kitsune warimesu" from japanese folks.