Slashdot Mirror


Japan Seeking to Govern Top News Web Sites

RemyBR writes "A Japanese government panel is proposing to govern "influential, widely read news-related sites as newspapers and broadcasting are now regulated." The panel, set up by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, said Internet service providers (ISPs) should be answerable for breaches of vaguer "minimum regulations" to guard against "illegal and harmful content." The conservative government, led by the Liberal Democratic Party, or LDP, is seeking to have the new laws passed by Parliament in 2010."

146 comments

  1. Can't resist... by Romwell · · Score: 1

    Japanese media Unhappy today 1984

    1. Re:Can't resist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it truly censorship to insist that reporting hold to standards of verifiable accuracy? Is it censorship to insist that mere speculations and claims be reported/identified as speculations and claims? Such things are a different path from the standard thing about censorship, which involves preventing various things from being reported at all. I'm not so sure censorship of the repressive sort is what the Japanese are suggesting.

    2. Re:Can't resist... by m94mni · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are you kidding?

      So when a news agency reports about irregularities in the next election, and the government forces the story to be clearly marked as speculation and inaccurate, you see no problem with that?

      Censorship regimes take many forms. You still have things to learn.

    3. Re:Can't resist... by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      do you live in the U.S.A? could you imagine the Bush regime making the standards for "verifiable accuracy", look at their distortions to justify war and warmongering, cover-ups for environmental damage and interfering with scientific studies, etc.

    4. Re:Can't resist... by psychodelicacy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you read the article, you'll see that this problem apparently extends beyond simple fact-checking. For example, categories such as "religion" and "political party" are already being filtered by rules which are ostensibly meant to make mobile content safe for under-18s.

      I have no problem with holding the media to account, but the goverment should not be doing so when it has a vested interest in the output it would be monitoring. Further, the legislation wouldn't limit government control to matters of fact or accuracy (difficult categories to establish in the first place.)

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
    5. Re:Can't resist... by SL+Baur · · Score: 5, Informative

      The LDP are on their way out. They got their butts kicked in the last election and lost the upper house. They haven't been able to sustain a majority of their own in 10 years and have enlisted the help of the Soka Gakkai[1], pardon me I mean the New Komeito Party.

      The LDP have had a total monopoly on Japanese politics since WWII. It would be most amusing for this to pass, the to-be-regulated web sites "move" out of Japanese jurisdiction and life goes on as before. Japanese always ignore warning signs[2] when noone is looking, so I wouldn't expect this to amount to much no matter what.

      [1] Soka Gakkai and IKEDA Daisuke are to Japan what the Church of Scientology and L. Ron Hubbard are to the US. My source? I was unhappily married to one.

      [2] I have a really cool digital photo of the highway bus terminal in Tsukuba. There
      s a sea of bicycles completely burying a sign in back which reads "no bicycle parking here".

    6. Re:Can't resist... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Even if they moved outside of their control, they would need ways to gather information inside their control or face becoming irrelevant. It would be these reporters and local offices that they could control.

    7. Re:Can't resist... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      If the source of inaccuracies or irregularities are actually speculation and possible inaccurate, then no I don't see a problem with that. In America, it seems to be a rallying cry for any democrat that loses an election and we would be served better if the extent of accuracy was stated with the story.

    8. Re:Can't resist... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Well, the lack of standard clearly show how we have been hurt by not having them with your post. I guess if we continue to say something, sooner or later it becomes the truth.

    9. Re:Can't resist... by Goaway · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well don't leave us hanging here! Were you married to L. Ron Hubbard, or Ikeda Daisuke?

    10. Re:Can't resist... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      do you live in the U.S.A? could you imagine the Bush regime making the standards for "verifiable accuracy",

      Yes...because all the other administrations have been so much better. Please.
      I'll be glad when Bush is out of office. Because then you'll have to blame the lies, cover-ups, and simple fuckups of the government on someone else.

      Hell no, I wouldn't want the Bush admin having control over these 'standards'. I wouldn't want any other administration having that power either.

    11. Re:Can't resist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL you were married to soka gakkai? Wow.

    12. Re:Can't resist... by badasscat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Censorship regimes take many forms. You still have things to learn.

      Xenophobia takes many forms too. And you also have things to learn.

      Things in Japan work differently than they do here. In some ways, they have more freedoms than we do. In other ways, they may have fewer. On balance, their system works. It is different than ours, but it works. They have a low crime rate, one of the world's largest economies, very low poverty, and nobody who lives there ever complains about government oppression that I've ever seen. There is no "Patriot Act" in Japan, for example - nothing to the same extent, anyway.

      One of the reasons their government probably works as well as it does is that election campaigns only last a matter of weeks, by law, and there are restrictions on how the press reports on them. There is not this free-for-all, superficial shrill screaming back and forth for literally years on end where people are forced to choose up sides and fight rather than work together.

      I'm not arguing against freedoms of the press. What I'm saying is nothing is completely unregulated (the press here are not allowed to write libelous articles just because they don't like someone, for example), and it's wrong to assume that the restrictions Japan puts on its press or its citizens are somehow worse than the restrictions we put on our press or our citizens. We don't have some magic formula here that every other country has to copy. Other countries can do things their own way and still allow their citizens to live full and free lives.

    13. Re:Can't resist... by joggle · · Score: 4, Informative

      Citizens in Japan don't have nearly as much political power as they do in America. They can not vote for the prime minister but only lower-level members. They can not vote on whether large projects should occur like they can in America. I remember when a proposal to build a high-speed rail test track was on the ballot in Colorado my Japanese friends were astonished that we could vote on such a thing.

      People in Japan are very much self-censored through societal pressure. It's really a totally different working environment from what I've seen and rather freedom-reducing since people are strongly encouraged to not stand out but to fit in with the rest as best as you can. This is true at least in Tokyo, but from what a friend of mine who lived for two years in the countryside tells me it's the same there. Youths can stand out but once you reach adulthood it's a totally different story.

    14. Re:Can't resist... by I_Voter · · Score: 1
      badasscat wrote:

      Things in Japan work differently than they do here.
      ------

      Would you believe that I actually RTFA - and if it is accurate I certainly agree with you.

      "Soon after the war we followed the U.S. model with the government issuing licenses through the FCC," Hizumi said. "As one party, the LDP, came to dominate politics, it sought more control of the media so the FCC was abolished. There is no ombudsman here, so the government controls the media directly. With this new bill, the LDP will seek to do the same for the Internet."

      Certainly, such a construct has benefited the LDP, which has enjoyed nearly unbroken rule in Japan since 1955. Since then, government's cozy relationship with big media has become legendary, as has the media's self-censorship, which, Hizumi said, had repeatedly restricted the spectrum of voices heard - until the arrival of the Internet started to open the field up to dissent.

      Now as a democrat I will accept that; if the Japanese people have not thrown, and will not throw, that political party out of power - they still have the right to self determination. However: They may also have to censor the international net. I suspect that this is not going to be in the material interest of the Japanese people.

      Note: I am not claiming that article is accurate. I am not very familiar with Japan.

      I_Voter

    15. Re:Can't resist... by shoemilk · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Your first paragraph is basically "Dear God, they use a parliamentary system like England!"

      Your second paragraph is "Dear God, they have a different culture!"

      Youths can stand out but once you reach adulthood it's a totally different story. You may have lived in Japan, but I don't think you spoke to many Japanese people. When I first got here, I had the same impressions, but after spending most of my time with Japanese people and not with foreigners I came to realize that's totally not the case. People here are really no different than anywhere else in the world except they're nicer to each other (outside of driving, bastards). I'd say people in Japan stick out even MORE so than people in the west. Sure you had Goths in America, but how many 40 year old goths? I've seen 40yo+ lolitas and gyals. Get out of Tokyo and the Salaryman office environment and SEE Japan.
    16. Re:Can't resist... by khallow · · Score: 1

      In other words, every society has something wrong with it. And nobody listens to good advice, especially their own.

    17. Re:Can't resist... by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      No, my late ex-wife was a Soka Gakkai and she tried to teach me all kinds of stuff I didn't want to know. Made me read all their propaganda, etc. etc.

    18. Re:Can't resist... by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Japanese do not have more freedom than Americans, and their system works, but only barely. They have a low crime rate because fewer crimes are reported, not because they're not occurring (something that has been changing in recent years). There is no Patriot Act, but I'm now required to have my fingerprints and photo taken every time I come home to Japan, even though I've lived here for six years, work as a teacher, and have a Japanese wife, and despite the fact that the only terrorist acts ever committed in Japan were done by Japanese.

      Election campaigns only lasting a few weeks means that the people have less time to hear about what's going on, have less time to discuss, and are usually less informed when they finally vote on somebody. Also, candidates are legally limited by how much of the population they can attempt to reach at any one time outside of certain channels - hand-outs, for example, can only be distributed to 8% of the voting population.

      How are restrictions on how the press reports on a candidate beneficial? When they're discouraged from revealing things that might cast a candidate in a negative light, even though everybody might be a lot better off knowing? Also, while the Japanese press never writes negative articles about all things Japanese, they feel no such restriction when it comes to writing libelous articles about foreign governments, companies or individuals.

      Japan manages to function pretty much exactly the way it always has for the last couple of centuries despite the imposition of the American-written constitution because just like any country, their politicians know how to interpret the law in ways that benefit their own agendas. Those that are in power tend to stay in power; Diet seats still manage to be passed down through powerful families, regardless of the "democratic" process, and the government is currently trying to instill fear into their citizens to serve their own ends.

      I recently had my conversation class at the high school where I teach writing about critical issues, and some of the students chose "internet regulation" as a topic. I let them write about it, even though I wasn't sure just how it counted as a critical issue, but now I see by this article that they were responding to the tripe that the media has been feeding people as the government ramps up to passing these stricter regulations.

      Remember, in Japan, "the nail that sticks up gets hammered down." The Japanese don't appreciate dissent, and those that are above you are supposed to be all-knowing and infallible, come hell or high water.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    19. Re:Can't resist... by Z34107 · · Score: 1

      So... Japan has less crime and higher standards of living... And they don't let people participate as much as we do?

      They may be on to something here...

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    20. Re:Can't resist... by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Perhaps you just don't understand the parliamentary system. You vote for all minister and between themselves the nominate and vote for who will be the prime minister, normally of course along party lines. Whilst you actually do not vote for who will be the actual prime minister, the parties declare well before hand whom they will nominate to be prime minister, so there are no real surprises.

      The big advantage, is if a lying, deceitful, blatantly corrupt and falsely religious scum bag get's to be prime minister, you can pressure your local ministers to remove him, no impeachment, no great travail, he can be gone with in a day, one quick vote and it is all over, then once they elect a new prime minister, the old one who has now lost their administrative powers can be readily prosecuted, it puts a powerful restraint upon excessive behaviour by any prime minister, as they can readily be fired if their behaviour threatens the electability of the other ministers in their own party.

      So to express in a manner that reflects the American system, it would be as if the speaker of the house of congress governed the country and all of speakers decisions were subject to constant reveue by congress and the President would basically be a empty figure with no real power at all. So no autocratic 'Weasel in Chief', no out of control 'Decider', it really does put the brakes on what some out of control fool can or can't do, as there are always members within their own party looking to replace them if the get to far out of line. So if their public approval rating drops below 30% they are basically gone within that week, no one wants a loser leading them to the next election.

      So in fact it really empowers the populace, and continually puts the prime minister under pressure to maintain their approval rating and major projects are subject to a continual system of approval because if it generates to much negative feedback from the populace, it lowers the prime minister approval rating to the point where members in the party feel threatened and immediately seek to replace the prime minister with a more popular figure who will then kill any excessively controversial projects in order to boost popularity, and yes there is always some minister ready willing and able to back stab the prime minister to take the top job, it really keeps them on their toes.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    21. Re:Can't resist... by gullevek · · Score: 1

      fully 100% agree. Most foreigners know Japan from some movies and Anime. They should come to Japan, live here for some years and hang out with japanese people and not more foreigners who bitch about japan.

      I live here, for more than five years, and Japan is in basic like any other country. Yeah things work different, but thats like every country. In basic, one big difference is, that japanese are way more friendly and way more helpful.

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
    22. Re:Can't resist... by TrikerBob · · Score: 1

      It's a good thing bush can't read - he'd think this was good idea.

    23. Re:Can't resist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soka Gakkai and IKEDA Daisuke are to Japan what the Church of Scientology and L. Ron Hubbard are to the US
      What utter BS. I'm also married to an SGI member and through her know quite a bit about Soka Gakkai. It's nothing like Scientology's ludicrous beliefs, there's none of their expensive "training", no thetan meters or whatever they're called. Don't be ridiculous - it's a lay buddhist association with pretty conventional buddhist beliefs.

      I think the only way you could say SGI is any "worse" than any other buddhist group is that they're more assertive in their promotion of buddhist ideals, with a heavy focus on peace. They have a lot of power in Japan mainly because of residual guilt over their persecution in the pre-WWII military govt. I suppose you could compare their activism to any number of Christian churches who do the same thing, but personally I find a message of tolerance, self-actualisation and peace a lot more palatable than trying to block gay marriage and ban condoms in the third world.

      My wife's explained a few things to me, and I've been given some books by other members, but I never felt they were trying to convert me or anything - I was interested and they just tried to teach me about something they strongly believe is good. I've never been dragged to a meeting and never felt like I was being proselytised to. Forgive me for saying, but I think the problem was with your ex-wife, not SGI. Religion of any type is not for me, beyond a general interest from a sociology/anthropological standpoint. But I have had no problems with them - I can honestly say I have never even had the slightest argument or even felt uncomfortable. Compared to the regular screaming matches I have with my Catholic sister over her unforgivable (IMO) attitude to gay marriage, SGI is a walk in the park. All of the nice parts of Christianity with none of the disgusting Old Testament hate.

      Bad apples in every group. Sounds like your wife was one of them. Sorry about that, but don't hate all of SGI because of it - they seem pretty good from my perspective. Certainly NOTHING like the dangerous, profiteering cult of Scientology.
    24. Re:Can't resist... by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Uh, I'm not sure I WANT to see a 40year-old lolita or gal... More power to them all the same.

      This does remind me that I should go to Japan again sometime.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    25. Re:Can't resist... by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      You didn't know this before you married her? Or is that why she's a late ex-wife (not implying that the "late" part was your doing, of course)?

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    26. Re:Can't resist... by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      I *was* dragged to the chief temple in Shinanomachi. Where I *did* see expensive things a good SGI member purchased and the beehive like drone of the chanting scared the living daylights out of me. I was also dragged to other meetings.

      I did know before we were married, and I told her, "I accept your religion for you, but I will never accept it myself." (that was after I googled it and spent some hours reading).

      I'm not a Reiser. She committed suicide after divorcing me (my company sent me to Beijing on an emergency trip to get Turbolinux 6.5 ready and she was convinced that it was a standard salaryman sex tour of Taiwan) and I was told through a third party after the fact and I was never told where her grave was (her family hated me and all gaijin) so I could go there to cry and lay flowers on it.

      I'm glad you have had happier experiences. I have not and I will always *despise* them.

    27. Re:Can't resist... by Larryish · · Score: 1

      Scientology is on the way out as well.

      Please welcome MYCONOLOGY!

      http://www.churchofmyconology.com/

      "Keep 'em in the dark, and feed 'em shit!"

    28. Re:Can't resist... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      eh, the point was government should not have such powers, not the money and power grubbing scum Bush/Cheney nor any other scum.

    29. Re:Can't resist... by joggle · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say they have higher standards of living. People in America don't die from exhaustion at work like they do here (they actually have a word for it and keep statistics on it). Recently a 30-yr old guy died working at a Toyota manufacturing company from a heart attack with no family history of heart disease. He was a manager who worked about over 80-100 hours every week which isn't that unusual here. My friend worked with teachers who spent very little time at home; rather most went drinking or to play pachinko after leaving the school at 9 or 10 each night. They have (virtually?) no labor unions and pretty much subject to the whims of their employers.

      The people I work with usually stay after 1-2am each night for weeks on end. I know that is somewhat unusual even here, but not as unusual as it is in the US.

      They also have much less personal space both at work and at home. Even high-level managers often don't have their own office in Tokyo.

      Their food is really good though. I like to tell my friends in America that we're well-fed slaves here.

    30. Re:Can't resist... by joggle · · Score: 1
      I don't know where you were but from what I've seen adults do not try to stand out. Virtually every man I've seen going on his way to work wears a black suit and tie. And I have yet to see anyone out of the thousands I pass every morning wear a pair of sunglasses and there certainly have been some sunny mornings during the last week. And the reaction isn't "dear God..." but simply explaining why there isn't as much production around elections here because they don't count nearly as much as they do in the US. Rather than requiring the public to get behind whatever President/project major interests here only need to focus on parliament members which tends to be much more quiet.

      Get out of Tokyo and the Salaryman office environment and SEE Japan. Oh believe me, I want to. Can't on this trip though. My friend lived in Takahama by the way but I believe teachers have much the same experience everywhere since they rotate them between schools every couple of years (see me other recent post for more info on his experience with them).
    31. Re:Can't resist... by joggle · · Score: 1

      They're certainly friendly but they sure could use some powerful labor unions. Some professions are utterly ridiculous (like elementary school teachers) and need some help to reduce the number of hours they are required to work. And forcing them to move every couple of years seems unreasonable as well. Unions can only go so far though since this really a symptom of the culture where you want to show you're a good worker by staying late every day--as late as possible. They have a word for dieing from working to death (karaoshi) and report on it from time to time in the local newspapers. And then there's high unemployment for certain demographics, like young men in Tokyo (> 10%). And it's virtually unheard of to start your own business here (if you're Japanese) and is impossible if you're a foreigner.

      While there are many things I like about Japan, I sure wouldn't want to live here--at least not as a programmer.

    32. Re:Can't resist... by shoemilk · · Score: 1

      And it's virtually unheard of to start your own business here (if you're Japanese) and is impossible if you're a foreigner. I'm not in IT so I don't know that side of it, but that sentence would leave me to believe that there are 0 small businesses in Japan, which is ridiculous. I thought about opening a restaurant here and there are a plethora of books about starting your own business in the bookstores. I don't have a link and I'm too lazy to search for it, but there are even websites dedicated to helping Japanese speaking foreigners with the laws required to start your own business. Maybe loans would be a bit more difficult, but not impossible.

      Some professions are utterly ridiculous (like elementary school teachers) and need some help to reduce the number of hours they are required to work Personally, I thought that the junior high teachers that I taught with had it a bit more rough than the elementary school teachers. There are no club activities in elementary school. I've known JH teachers who spend the night in the teachers room because they live too far from school and didn't finish working until 3AM and decided it was easier to sleep there than drive home.

      And forcing them to move every couple of years seems unreasonable as well. That's not just teachers. I have a good friend who works for the Post Office, the only reason I know her is because she was transfered from her hometown to where I live, a short 2.5 hours by car (on top of that, she has to go to an office on an outer island). My wife ran into a friend's younger sister working at a grocery store and she said she was transfered from her home town to where we were. A grocery store clerk! Also, I suggest that you do like I'm doing and try to move in March. It's quite the experience. Lots of new places that are immediately booked because half of Japan is moving because they're being transfered.

      As John Denver once said, "Thank god I'm a country boy." I'm really glad I don't have to work with salarymen. Please, try to see some of Japan's beautiful countryside and go have a drink at a small izakaya and chat up a farmer or two. Talk about fun loving people...
    33. Re:Can't resist... by shoemilk · · Score: 1

      the sunglass thing is simple. Sunglasses are worn by Yakuza. Normal people don't want to be thought of as yakuza, so the don't wear sunglasses. Also, darker colored eyes tend to be less sensitive to light. Days where I've been blinded by the sun, my wife and her family thought nothing of it. Hit Osaka up and you'll see a lot of different styles, including the now trendy big-ass sunglasses. They aren't worn because they're needed, they're worn for style.

      I'm sorry I was over-dramatic with the whole "dear God" thing. However, since the Japanese government is on a parliamentary system, there aren't regular elections like in America, so the big to-dos aren't as predictable. But during election time, it's really annoying. You can't go anywhere without there being 15 different cars driving around yelling and screaming. On the plus side though, you don't see any political ads on TV. The systems are too different though. While a loser like Abe was gone quickly, we've had to deal with Bush for 8 years.

    34. Re:Can't resist... by gullevek · · Score: 1

      Well I am a foreign Programmer in Japan and I am doing very well. Yeah there are a lot of working hours, but thats so, and I don't complain.

      It's also wrong that foreigners can't start a business. Some do, some don't. It's probably not as easy as in America, but thats country laws and you can't expect the same everywhere ...

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
  2. might actually work... by edn4 · · Score: 1

    well, at least they aren't hoping to create a new internet... just severely limit the current one. The sad thing is, I could see this plan working with the pressure on ISPs.

    1. Re:might actually work... by rfc11fan · · Score: 1

      So maybe we'll have to return to the use of radio and fax to share the truth with Japan.

  3. Never fails by tkrotchko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Governments, no matter how benign, really hate unfettered access to information.

    The most discouraging part is a majority of people seem to agree ("...well, as long as it's to fight the terrorist...").

    The most predictable part is someone will say "...this isn't about free speech".

    A truism: "When somebody says 'this isn't about free speech', it almost certainly is".

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:Never fails by causality · · Score: 1

      A truism: "When somebody says 'this isn't about free speech', it almost certainly is".

      Yes, usually what they really mean is "don't let those pesky human rights concerns get in the way of what I want to accomplish." For some reason, we put up with people like that. It's rather pathetic really.
      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    2. Re:Never fails by JoshuaDFranklin · · Score: 1

      This is not a new thing related to terrorists. Japanese newspapers have been heavily regulated since after World War II, mostly to supress overly nationalistic editorials (or, during the Cold War, Communist).

    3. Re:Never fails by KPU · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because controlling the press is the best way to prevent an authoritarian government?

    4. Re:Never fails by BlackSabbath · · Score: 1

      "When somebody says 'this isn't about free speech', it almost certainly is".

      "Well, what sort of chance does that give me??? Alright then! It IS about free speech."

      "!!!SEE!!! It *IS* about free spech!!!"

      (with apologies to Monty Python)

    5. Re:Never fails by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Because controlling the press is the best way to prevent an authoritarian government?

      Damn that made me laugh, I wish I had mod points.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  4. Putin-like by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Soon after the war we followed the U.S. model with the government issuing licenses through the FCC," Hizumi said. "As one party, the LDP, came to dominate politics, it sought more control of the media so the FCC was abolished. There is no ombudsman here, so the government controls the media directly.

    It sounds like a Putin-style media. Free-press is getting harder to find in the world.

    1. Re:Putin-like by webmaster404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It sounds like a Putin-style media. Free-press is getting harder to find in the world.

      No its much easier. With the Internet its very very easy to find free press. /. is a good example, Wikileaks is another. CNN and Fox news aren't exactly much "free-press" and if this is "top news sites" that is probobly exactly what the Japanese government seeks to regulate the CNNs and Fox news of Japan not the /. and Wikileaks although they are probably next. So no, free press isn't hard to find, it is much easier then 50 years ago, you no longer need a printing press and paper just a 'net connection and a computer to report.
      --
      There is no "disagree" moderation, and troll, flamebait and overrated are not valid substitutes
  5. strange... by superflytnt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The conservative government, led by the Liberal Democratic Party"

    There's something a little odd about that name, don't you think?

    1. Re:strange... by causality · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "The conservative government, led by the Liberal Democratic Party"

      There's something a little odd about that name, don't you think?

      Sounds like the USA to me. "Liberal" and "Conservative", yet no matter which is elected the government expands in size and power. Clever, isn't it? That there might be no real difference between them is a fact about which we are more honest when it comes to other countries, apparently.
      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    2. Re:strange... by Futile+Rhetoric · · Score: 1

      Next you're going to tell us there's something wrong with Democratic People's Republic of Korea, too.

    3. Re:strange... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      Uhm, it is the Japanese, 'nuff said.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    4. Re:strange... by kiyoshilionz · · Score: 1

      "The conservative government, led by the Liberal Democratic Party"

      There's something a little odd about that name, don't you think? Not really.

      American conventions of liberal Democrats vs. conservative Republicans is simply an *American* labeling of political affiliations. And even then it's just a function of our current time period

      To give you a domestic example of this being switched, remember those crazy "Radical Republicans" of the late 1850's, early 1860's that has the "Radical" notion that blacks were human beings too?

      Or to show you how foreign countries don't use the same nomenclature, there's the National Democratic Party of Germany which is "viewed by its opponents and the mainstream media as a de facto neo-Nazi organization".

    5. Re:strange... by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, in Poland one of our major parties is "Law and Justice", a Christian-fundamentalist party that makes Dubya look like a good boy scout. One of main parts of their platform is "eradicating corruption", and I think you can guess how well they fare. The name obliges, after all.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    6. Re:strange... by Korveck · · Score: 1

      Literal meanings of party names in Asia quite often do not represent their true ideologies. Most of them just put democratic/liberal in their names just to sound good, or whatever.

    7. Re:strange... by Wowsers · · Score: 1

      Next you're going to tell us there's something wrong with Democratic People's Republic of Korea, too. Well for a start, their title is wrong :o
      --
      Take Nobody's Word For It.
    8. Re:strange... by STrinity · · Score: 5, Informative

      "The conservative government, led by the Liberal Democratic Party"

      There's something a little odd about that name, don't you think?


      Only if you assume that American political terminology is standard for the rest of the world.
       
      In most places "liberal" is equivalent to what Americans call "libertarian," and the parties Americans call "liberal' are known as "labor" or "left".
      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    9. Re:strange... by J0nne · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Liberal" means something completely different outside of the US.

    10. Re:strange... by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Funny

      "The conservative government, led by the Liberal Democratic Party"

      There's something a little odd about that name, don't you think?
      Sounds like the USA to me. "Liberal" and "Conservative", yet no matter which is elected the government expands in size and power. Clever, isn't it? That there might be no real difference between them is a fact about which we are more honest when it comes to other countries, apparently.

      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    11. Re:strange... by flyneye · · Score: 3, Informative

      Truthfully here Democrats and Republicans are cut from the same powerhungry, force-your-dictatorial-philosophy cloth in spite of the differences in the lies they extrude through your enemy and mine,the Press.
      Makes you wonder: A.if Japan has the equivalent of a Libertarian party.
                                                                    B. why we haven't had another revolution yet.
      Makes ya think,donut?

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    12. Re:strange... by soundhack · · Score: 1

      Not really, in that People's Republic of China and Democratic People's Republic of Korea are neither.

    13. Re:strange... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The conservative government, led by the Liberal Democratic Party. Liberal is a clearly defined word, and their party name is at odds with that definition. Of course, so are a whole bunch of other parties, so it's not something to get excited about.

    14. Re:strange... by Samgilljoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Only if you assume that American political terminology is standard for the rest of the world.

      In most places "liberal" is equivalent to what Americans call "libertarian," and the parties Americans call "liberal' are known as "labor" or "left".

      Just want to second that. Here in the U.S., conservatives have labored since the 60's at least to redefine the term "liberal" for their own benefit. They achieved success in late 70's/early 80's. At this point, few people know any meaning for the term other than what the political class uses. Still, everyone is pretty far away from Latin liberalis at this point. I wonder whether the concept behind that term will ever be strong enough again to merit a word that unambiguously denotes it.

      "Liberal" in U.S. political discourse is the result of an extremely successful and masterful propaganda/marketing campaign. I despise the result, but damn, you have to admire such conceptual and linguistic control of the masses.

    15. Re:strange... by vidarh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In Europe at least "liberal" parties are usually centrist or at least closer to the political centre than the conservative parties. It's pretty rare for a party with "liberal" in the name to be considered conservative here, though not that unusual for them to be considered right wing.

    16. Re:strange... by DrLang21 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't forget that Evangelical Christians labored since the 70s to redefine the term "conservative" for their own benefit. They achieved success rather quickly with Jerry Falwell uniting the evangelical christians to hi-jack the Republican party. Now the term "conservative" more closely defines a set of social control principles that force everyone to act like the Calvinists. It has little to nothing to do with conservation of traditional governmental practice.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    17. Re:strange... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Not really. Liberal and conservative is more of a local thing then an international one. Some people like to relate on an international level which places things like the liberal democrats on the conservative side. But inside the country, they are probably more liberal then some of the parties, more specifically the ones in power when they came about.

    18. Re:strange... by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Insightful
      In most places "liberal" is equivalent to what Americans call "libertarian," and the parties Americans call "liberal' are known as "labor" or "left".

      Actually, what Americans call 'liberal' we call 'moderate Conservative'. What we call left-wing, Americans call pinko Commie traitors.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    19. Re:strange... by Atlantis-Rising · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The definition of 'liberal' has changed drastically since its arguable inception in the early 17th century. The development is fascinating and also, to a great degree, logically sound, but that's another issue entirely.

      Suffice it to say that the word 'liberal' is not a clearly defined word. John Locke, for example, did not support democracy. Liberalism in its most original form was essentially a philosophy supporting freedom and equality for the people in all forms. Eventually this morphed into liberal socialism; which supported the state providing for individuals so that they had equality of opportunity as well as freedom of opportunity. Modern liberalism, as a rule, continues along this trend, integrating more elements of socialism into it.

      --
      "It is possible to commit no errors and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." -Peak Performance
    20. Re:strange... by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm so glad I'm not the only slashdotter who noticed that! However, it's probably no more odd than the name of the party that ruled Mexico for so many decades: the Party of Institutionalized Revolution. I always wondered how it could be both institutionalized and revolutionary, but AFAICT, nobody South of the Border found anything strange about it.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    21. Re:strange... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Indeed, here in Australia the conservative party is called the Liberal party and the 'liberal' party is called the Labor party.

      To make things worse the current Labor PM calls himself a fiscal conservative, the greens call themselves conservationists, and the conservatives claim to support liberal democracy.

      Reconciling this confusing terminology is simple. They ALL claim to support UHC, therefore they must ALL be commies. /sarcasm

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    22. Re:strange... by FromTheAir · · Score: 1

      Conservatism = Wisdom Libertarianism = Freedom They are not in conflict. What is in conflict is all the fiction surrounding them. Labels divide and are used to disempower and destroy unity.

      --
      "an infinite player that has lost his finite mind" ~Infinite Play the Movie (it blends with reality)
    23. Re:strange... by Derosian · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't blame me I'm voting for Ron Paul in the primaries!

    24. Re:strange... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the USA to me. "Liberal" and "Conservative", yet no matter which is elected the government expands in size and power.

      Generally, it most screwed up when both the Executive Branch (President), and the Legislative Branch (Congress) are controlled by the same party. If Bush had had a Democrat controlled Congress, things might not be so screwed up. Now that we have a Democratic controlled Congress...a Democrat president will screw things up just as bad, but maybe in a different direction.

      There is no real difference, though. They both just like to bitch about the other party.
      "If 'we' say it, it's great. If 'they' say the exact same thing, it is wrong and evil."

    25. Re:strange... by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      > Or to show you how foreign countries don't use the same nomenclature, there's the
      > National Democratic Party of Germany which is "viewed by its opponents and the
      > mainstream media as a de facto neo-Nazi organization".

          Then there was the National Socialist German Workers Party. No xenophobes, they even accepted a former Austrian corporal as their leader. And the rest was history.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    26. Re:strange... by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      Eventually this morphed into liberal socialism; which supported the state providing for individuals so that they had equality of opportunity as well as freedom of opportunity. Only in the US. In Europe (e.g. UK), liberal means more what libertarian does in the US: social and economic freedoms are both important. There is more discussion of this at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_Liberalism and on the accompanying discussion page.

      The Liberal Party of Australia is actually economically laissez-faire and socially conservative--the exact opposite of the US.

      Btw, I would argue that liberal socialism involves a trade off between equality of opportunity and freedom of opportunity. It limits the latter to increase the former.
    27. Re:strange... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most places "liberal" is equivalent to what Americans call "libertarian," and the parties Americans call "liberal' are known as "labor" or "left".

      That's not true either - it may be like that in mainland Europe, but "liberal" parties across the world can fall pretty much anywhere on the political spectrum. For example, the Liberal Democrats in the UK are the most left-wing of the major parties; and the Liberals in Australia and Japan are very close to what Americans would call "conservative", if you ignore the religious aspect. Something similar happens for "conservative"; in China if you describe someone as conservative it means they're an old-style communist.

    28. Re:strange... by EsonLinji · · Score: 1

      I've always thought it was a clever marketing ploy. When the right wing is called the Liberal Democratic Party, what can the left wing call itself? Anything with communist or socialist is pretty much doomed to failure, but anything less sounds like just more of the same. Indeed the main opposition is the Democratic Party. Imagine the confusion that would have caused in Florida.

      --
      Considering Phlebas, whoever the hell he is.
    29. Re:strange... by Steneub · · Score: 1

      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos! Quiet, you!
    30. Re:strange... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just want to second that. Here in the U.S., conservatives have labored since the 60's at least to redefine the term "liberal" for their own benefit. They achieved success in late 70's/early 80's. At this point, few people know any meaning for the term other than what the political class uses. Still, everyone is pretty far away from Latin liberalis at this point. Sorry, but it was FDR that did the redefining with his Four Freedoms. The concepts of "Freedom from Want" and "Freedom from Fear" are not classical forms of freedom, but clever political justifications for increasing the government apparatus.
  6. In Minitrue we trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  7. now let's see if there's a backlash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder whether there will be anyone in Japan campaigning against this, or will they just sit there and accept that restricting media is "normal"? I really hope to see some reaction against this... Does anyone know the exact motivation? Is it to limit free speech, has there been a specific event or events that triggered this?

  8. What this means by dattaway · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We are allowed to make fun of other people, but not companies or government officials.

  9. And in other news... by DamienRBlack · · Score: 0

    Japan is the best country in the world. Really. Trust us.

    1. Re:And in other news... by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 0

      Looks like the Wapanese have modded you down. :D

  10. Japanese are right! by Mr.Ballmer · · Score: 0

    Any negative comments about Microsoft or it's products should also be added to the "filters" guys! http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com/

  11. it will only force the free press underground by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    and with Japan as technologically savvy as it is there would be small underground pulp newspapers, pirate radio off shore on fishing boats & etc...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  12. Cultural schizophrenia by Gothmolly · · Score: 0, Troll

    Japan's twisted culture is epitomized in the phrase: "The conservative government, led by the Liberal Democratic Party, or LDP..."

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Cultural schizophrenia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't the "conservative" "democrat" thing that people find odd. It's the "conservative government" of the "liberal..." party that they find odd.

      You can call your democrats conservative, I don't care. But you can't freaking call your conservatives liberal!

    2. Re:Cultural schizophrenia by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      Nice to see somebody actually read my post.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  13. I know they want to be like us... by DanWS6 · · Score: 1

    but this is just silly...

  14. Precedent already set: Japan powerless to rule web by etymxris · · Score: 5, Informative
    See 2ch.net:

    There are numerous civil actions against Hiroyuki by individuals and corporations for slander and defamation. Hiroyuki so far ignored every court order and has never shown up for any trial and he has lost every civil case brought against him by default. Hiroyuki does not hold any sizable asset in Japan and any financial gain by Hiroyuki (bar what the court rule as necessary living expense) is subject to foreclosure. 2channel's assets are all held overseas; the servers are located in California and the domains are owned by a United States registrar. Moreover, technically, Hiroyuki does not own 2channel. None of the winners of civil action collected any money from Hiroyuki.

    In January 2007, a small court in Japan, making a judgement on yet another slander case, announced that 2channel's holding company was bankrupt and it would be repossessed. This claim was openly mocked by Hiroyuki on 2channel's splash page, and nothing of the sort happened, although 2channel's Japanese ISP ended its operations.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2ch#Free_speech Basically, any website that doesn't want government regulation will just relocate its servers to the U.S. Due to the differing laws, they will not be able to subpoena IP logs or have any way of getting at the people that post to the site. The owner of the site may have some trouble if he continues living in Japan, but there will probably be ex patriots in the U.S. willing to "own" the site to avoid such trouble.
  15. Holding to account by Wowsers · · Score: 1

    A government not liking their people talking about and attempting to hold crooked politicians to account (whatever country). What a surprise, not!

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
  16. There are better ways to stop libel. by gnutoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    See US Liable Laws for a good, civil way to take care of malicious harm. Barriers are high to prevent abuse, it's done after the fact and has nothing to do with the government except for the government providing a neutral judge and documentation of the case. Free speech is so important that prior restraint is reserved only for extreme danger like nuclear weapon design and even then it's debatable. Other restraints like the DMCA are laughable and will be struck down sooner than later.

    Setting up a powerful board with a vague mandate is a very different kettle of fish. Analogies to broadcast don't hold internet water. The public interest in pull media demands freedom and neutrality where the public interest in once scarce spectrum demanded accountability. We have all seen how abused that power over broadcast was ... because we now have free internet news for fact checking. That free media has proved more consistent, informative and reliable than broadcast ever was. "Regulation" of the internet will make it look more like broadcast than reliable or truthful. Without care, it will be pure censorship and can also be used to smear and cause harm without redress.

    It is hard to believe that this basic issue has escaped the attention of those planning "accountability".

  17. Re:Precedent already set: Japan powerless to rule by dattaway · · Score: 4, Funny

    just relocate its servers to the U.S. Due to the differing laws, they will not be able to subpoena IP logs or have any way of getting at the people that post to the site.

    Sure, just post it to wikileaks.

  18. Yes, we need to maintain the fictions and story by FromTheAir · · Score: 1
    Yes, we need to maintain the fictions and popular story that a few benefit from to the detriment of the many. It is vital that the general population does not become to aware because this would disrupt all systems founded and based on popular ignorance.

    The last thing we need is a open source subscriber based intelligence service where importance is determined collectively, and the discourse and content results from collaboration of minds not behold to any special interests but in the interests of our collective benefit. The idea of freeing science and innovation from political constraints must be worrisome for some.

    "The future of the Media is a subscriber based infrastructure which is superior in design to potentially biased, advertising supported, centrally controlled information reporting. Or an organization that has parents with special interests to protect or favors to impart. Conventional advertising is flawed and costs the consumer billions in out of pocket expense. Let us elaborate." ~ http://newswire.pro/

    We are already seeing the effects of collective power and it is good.

    --
    "an infinite player that has lost his finite mind" ~Infinite Play the Movie (it blends with reality)
    1. Re:Yes, we need to maintain the fictions and story by zoltankemeny · · Score: 1

      Actually the power you're referring to is not collective at all. It is individual at its source because singular people are making the choice to determine what media is superior. Collective power is what you see when individual power is denied, like the government restriction and conventional advertising you refer to.

    2. Re:Yes, we need to maintain the fictions and story by causality · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed. I wish people would figure out that what's good for the individual is good for the collective. If not, the collective is fatally flawed and needs to be disregarded or disposed of.

      Having said that, I don't really believe in a "collective" in the political sense (although I am without doubt that there is such a thing in the natural and spiritual sense). You can speak of it as though it were a real thing, but it's not. It's more of a construct, an illusion; it's something that politicians find very convenient. I almost never hear the terms "collective" or "greater good" or "for the benefit of the nation" etc used for any purpose other than justifying the subservience of the individual to the state.

      Corporations don't have intelligence, or emotions, or souls, or any sort of life. Nor do governments. Such hierarchies are just inanimate objects, tools utilized by people to achieve their goals. The idea that a sentient, sapient human being should submit to an inanimate object to preserve someone's political power is a direct insult against what it means to be human. You wonder why the world is in such turmoil right now? I say it's because a way of life built on such a fatally flawed idea is destined to crumble, sooner or later.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    3. Re:Yes, we need to maintain the fictions and story by zoltankemeny · · Score: 1

      I don't really believe in a "collective" in the political sense Then what is good for the individual is good for the individual, not good for the "collective." I agree with you that it's a construct, but you used the term first and I felt obligated to stay within that term instead of causing unwanted confusion. I really liked the last paragraph, though. Very Discordian.

    4. Re:Yes, we need to maintain the fictions and story by causality · · Score: 1

      I don't really believe in a "collective" in the political sense Then what is good for the individual is good for the individual, not good for the "collective." I agree with you that it's a construct, but you used the term first and I felt obligated to stay within that term instead of causing unwanted confusion. I really liked the last paragraph, though. Very Discordian.

      What I was saying is that a group (be it a nation, etc) of free, empowered individuals who are subjects of no one, with the right to do anything they please so long as they don't harm another person or interfere with another person's freedoms in any way, is the best sort of "collective" I could imagine. This of course would bear little or no resemblence to the "all march to the beat of one drummer" that constitutes what is usually thought of as a "collective." FYI, I did not use the term first; see the post to which I was replying.
      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    5. Re:Yes, we need to maintain the fictions and story by FromTheAir · · Score: 1
      Yes the collective depends on the free radical, the eccentric, the rule breaker, the outcast for it's survival, discovery, invention and evolution.

      This is why individual freedom of expression is never suppressed it would be detrimental to the collective.

      A good example is China it has created an environment that blocks innovation conditioning everyone to be the same and forcing types of behavior. It has failed to fully implement collectivism by giving every individual a vote.

      As such it needs to copy the innovation of other countries.

      --
      "an infinite player that has lost his finite mind" ~Infinite Play the Movie (it blends with reality)
    6. Re:Yes, we need to maintain the fictions and story by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      You wonder why the world is in such turmoil right now?
      Anyone who wonders this is ignorant of history; the world has been in such "turmoil" since the beginning of recorded history. There have been small pockets of relative peace and prosperity in one place or another over time, but the general history of the world is one of war, oppression, and chaos.

      That's not to say we couldn't construct a society that is generally peaceful -- the fact that there hasn't been military action in as populated an area as the continental U.S. in the last 140 years, for example, is quite remarkable in a historical sense -- but let's not delude ourselves and think that things are actually worse now overall than they've been in the past.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    7. Re:Yes, we need to maintain the fictions and story by causality · · Score: 1

      You wonder why the world is in such turmoil right now?

      Anyone who wonders this is ignorant of history; the world has been in such "turmoil" since the beginning of recorded history. There have been small pockets of relative peace and prosperity in one place or another over time, but the general history of the world is one of war, oppression, and chaos.

      This is where a single word becomes a stumbling block and you get caught up on that one word and so miss the entire meaning of what I was saying. Just because I say the world is in turmoil right now is not the same as saying that it has never been in such a state or never will be. In fact since devaluing and dehumanizing the individual (treating him/her as just a cog in the machine of society) is not at all new, you would expect to have seen these problems throughout history and this is exactly the case.

      In the past we've built our society on the same idea. If it wasn't the elected government, it was the king, or the warlord, etc. Thus we've continued to have the same problems because we've continued to use the same idea. You know, the Slashdot crowd seriously needs an exercise in basic logic and critical thought. Perhaps then, they would not highlight the obvious or attack claims I was not making (in this case, I was not making the claim that this was something new, only that we are experiencing an iteration of it right now). I can't anticipate and preempt every silly way that someone might misinterpret what I have plainly said, or assume I intended what I did not say. You want another good example of this? Read this thread and see the AC who responds to what I was very explicitly not saying, then see a logged-in user who failed to read my response to that and then he does the exact same thing. Don't be another of these, please, for they are a dime a dozen.

      My point (of the post to which you were responding) was that the conventional approach of explaining the current problems in terms of $political_issue_of_the_day is superficial at best. The particular issues change; so do the particular problems associated with them. The common threads are much more useful, and what I pointed out has consistently been one of them. That was all I was claiming, nothing more.
      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    8. Re:Yes, we need to maintain the fictions and story by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      *sigh* What you said (among other things) was:

      You wonder why the world is in such turmoil right now?
      ...implying that the world is in more turmoil now than in the past. Which is not true, which is what I pointed out. I was saying nothing about the rest of your post. It looks like you fell over the same "stumbling block" you seem to enjoy ranting about everyone else making. As if you're the only person here who has the ability to think critically? Do you really think ad hominem attacks make you more right?

      Nothing I said implies that the rest of your post is invalid; I was just addressing that particular "things are worse now" meme that you (probably unconsciously) repeated.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  19. I concur by OrangeTide · · Score: 0

    I approve of this message.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  20. Knee-jerk didn't read article, dismiss Japan by joneshenry · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, the most predictable thing on Slashdot is posters who don't read the articles and who parrot the most popular opinion.

    The article doesn't mention anything resembling terrorism as the reason. What the article discusses in some detail is that the Japanese ruling political party, the LDP, has ruled the country virtually unchallenged for decades. The slightest bit of thought shows that the LDP has achieved almost every single goal of what the most progressive Democrats are advocating in the United States: universal health care, effective mass transit, a constitutional ban against the use of the military except to defend the nation, unparalleled Internet connectivity and infrastructure, all within the framework of a liberal democracy. (And for many environmentalists, Japan has achieved the ideal of negative population growth.) As part of the system that rules Japan, college entrance exams are used as a filter to establish that those who ascend to rule Japan are part of a meritocracy. This and not terrorism is the context of Japanese concerns to save the children. As has been discussed by the Christian Science Monitor, the Japanese are probably far more willing to accept Internet filtering to protect the children out of fear of web sites that discuss topics such as group suicides.

    And given that the Japanese system works better than almost any other in the world (only a few Western European nations even have an argument), a response of apathetic indifference by the majority ruled by that system is indeed perfectly rational and defensible. The bloggers who fear being censored represent the malcontents, the rejects, the people who were not quite good enough, the people who have not demonstrated their ability to responsibly maintain what the Japanese system has built to the envy of the rest of the world.

    1. Re:Knee-jerk didn't read article, dismiss Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Just...wow. Do you actually believe that the Japanese system is perfect and that anyone who dissents is a malconent? Stalin would be proud of you, comrade.

    2. Re:Knee-jerk didn't read article, dismiss Japan by Atlantis-Rising · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's what he's saying at all. He's saying that the people who will complain are not the people who are particularly 'oppressed' by the system, but the small (but extremely vocal) minority that has not succeeded in the system, and hence dislike it.

      It's somewhat of a truism that most people who succeed in a system wish to maintain it; what the grandparent seems to be suggesting is that the majority of Japanese 'succeed' in the system and therefore would not object, or in fact, would support, this move.

      He's also saying that he thinks the Japanese have succeeded in creating a successful liberal-democratic society along the lines of the Scandinavians, and that by 'successful' it has [mostly] achieved the goals of liberal democracy (if that term even has meaning anymore these days).

      --
      "It is possible to commit no errors and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." -Peak Performance
    3. Re:Knee-jerk didn't read article, dismiss Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by 'successful' you mean a floundering economy, rising taxes, overcrowding, censorship, and onerous legal burdens placed upon the poplulace than yes, you are right. They are very successful when viewed in that light.

    4. Re:Knee-jerk didn't read article, dismiss Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that overcrowding is a function of their small physical area, their economy is the second largest in the world, and you have not proved any of the other accusations (or why they're bad, even) as well, allow me to take your comments with a very large grain of salt.

    5. Re:Knee-jerk didn't read article, dismiss Japan by Carbon016 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That constitutional ban (actually, the entire constitution) was not achieved by the LDP. In fact, the LDP did not even exist at the time the constitution was written. It was achieved by General MacArthur as SCAP during the occupation. The Diet simply copied his suggestion with some very basic changes and voters approved it.

      The LDP has ended up creating a "capitalist development state" that thrives on neo-fascistic cooperation between government and corporate entities, dominate the government largely through being the most general party of any country ever, choose successors (which will by default become president) by the old cliche of smoke-filled back rooms, and historically have promoted both stupid banks and pork projects to prop up uncompetitive businesses with loans that will never be paid off and spending that dramatically overvalued those projects. This both led to and resulted from a massive economic crisis in the 1990s which still has effects. How did they attempt to fix it? They elected a crazy populist Koizumi ten years later who managed to clean most of the economic messes up. It's still a nightmare if you look at it from a Western perspective: corruption and scandal is essentially everywhere. It works, but we shouldn't be too quick to hold the LDP up as a bastion of reform and liberalism because it's basically a party that stands for nothing.

  21. great here come the nipzis! by DragonTHC · · Score: 1, Troll

    I guess we know what japan's priorities are.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
    1. Re:great here come the nipzis! by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I guess we know what japan's priorities are. Uhh... you didn't know what they were before?
      Japanese culture has always been wildly different from that of 'the west'.

      It's just odd that you'd call them nazis for censoring, but not for fining & caning citizens and foreigners alike into compliance with some very strict laws.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  22. Re:Precedent already set: Japan powerless to rule by Stiletto · · Score: 1, Troll


    If I were worried about my site being shut down due to offending people with money/power, I sure wouldn't host it in the U.S. Find a country without DMCA takedowns, secret courts, and "terror" lawsuits that come with automatic gag orders, in other words, some place with more freedom than the U.S.

  23. How ironic by soundhack · · Score: 1

    This is true globalization, if japanese news gets hosted in countries such as the US to avoid government oversight while American music/movies/porn gets hosted in countries like Japan to avoid the RIAA/MPAA/etc.

  24. agreed by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I concur with this post too.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  25. No, the US is not avoiding censorship. by gnutoo · · Score: 1, Informative

    The US has a legal and philosophical framework that expressly forbids censorship but has ignored it in crucial ways. Broadcast monopolies have been a universal dissaster for free press and democracy but were technically required until about twenty years ago. The unanimous clamoring for "traffic shaping" by ISPs and telcos, if granted will propagate broadcast monopolies onto the internet. It's hard to tell if that or a government panel would be worse but both are unacceptable. Our high minded constitution also forbids phone taps, email reading and web snooping without a warrent. It's debasement is a travesty.

  26. "Censorship" again by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Consider this. Mass media IS regulated. You cannot print WHATEVER you want in Washington Post or NYT. You cannot say WHATEVER you want on radio. You cannot show WHATEVER you want on television. There is FCC. There are rules that papers, tv and radio stations must go by.

    Now, if some website is circulating news with similar audience, would not it be fair to traditional media to apply the same rules to non-traditional competitors of the traditional media? Internet has matured, dudes and dudettes, and became a mainstream media.

    Learn to live with that and play by the same rules traditional media is playing.

    The only problem I see hear is the implementation of those rules. I do not know how they are going to do that.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:"Censorship" again by John_Sauter · · Score: 1

      Consider this. Mass media IS regulated. You cannot print WHATEVER you want in Washington Post or NYT. You cannot say WHATEVER you want on radio. You cannot show WHATEVER you want on television. There is FCC. There are rules that papers, tv and radio stations must go by.

      Now, if some website is circulating news with similar audience, would not it be fair to traditional media to apply the same rules to non-traditional competitors of the traditional media? Internet has matured, dudes and dudettes, and became a mainstream media.

      Learn to live with that and play by the same rules traditional media is playing.

      The only problem I see hear is the implementation of those rules. I do not know how they are going to do that.

      I think a better solution to the "fairness" problem would be to unregulate mass media. Why shouldn't the Washington Post, the New York Times, TV stations and radio stations say whatever they want?

    2. Re:"Censorship" again by Murrquan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is an argument that broadcast media must be regulated, seeing as how it takes place over public airwaves. I don't see how that applies to printed media or the Internet, though.

    3. Re:"Censorship" again by John_Sauter · · Score: 1

      There is an argument that broadcast media must be regulated, seeing as how it takes place over public airwaves. I don't see how that applies to printed media or the Internet, though.

      I've never bought the argument that broadcast media must be regulated because it uses public airwaves. If I take a soapbox to the local public park, stand on it, and talk in a loud voice about how I don't like the mayor's policies, and think the city council should do a better job of overseeing the city's Public Works department, that speech is not regulated, by long-standing custom.

      I can even say negative things about the Mayor, so long as they are true, or just expressions of my opinion. I can hand leaflets to anyone who will take one. I can name the members of the city council, tell my audience where they live, and urge them to speak directly to the counselor from their district. All this is protected by US law.

      I can speak about how I would like certain laws changed. I can complain about how the anti-prostitution laws reduce employment of young girls, hurt the tourist trade, and deprive young men of a non-violent outlet for their passions, thus increasing street violence. In my speech on this subject I can go into detail about the beauty and skills of the local girls, and some bluenoses may be offended by my frank language, but my speech is protected by US law.

      I can complain about how the anti-drug laws encourage disrespect for the law, enable violent law-breakers to make large profits, and increase the cost of medically-necessary drugs. I can go into detail about the violence of the drug wars, and the suffering of those dying because they cannot afford drugs that would ease their pain, and my speech is protected by US law.

      Our traditions allow me to use the “public airwaves” (soundwaves in the air of the public park) to speak. Why must we regulate radio and television stations? They have louder voices than mine, but they do not drown out all dissenting voices.

    4. Re:"Censorship" again by Murrquan · · Score: 1

      What regulations already apply to speech in public places? You can condemn the mayor if you like, but if you're crusing the block thumpin' your subwoofer at 120 decibels you're liable to be fined. There are laws against public indecency in most parts of these United States, as well.

      I am against laws that limit political expression -- like the ones the original article was talking about, and the ones you are talking about. But certain kinds of expression are truly offensive, and not just because of the opinions contained therein. Laws against that, whether in the park or on the airwaves, are no different from laws against dumping your sewage in public waterways.

      I guess if Japan's government has already decided they can restrict political speech in certain forums, however, it's not so great a leap of logic for them to do what the article's talking about.

  27. Salt and pepper by RudeIota · · Score: 1

    The difference between 'liberal' and 'conservative' is much like salt and pepper. The flavor is tremendously different and use to flavor different things... But they are still seasonings and still used on a lot of the same food because they do the same thing - add flavor. Democrats and Republicans are very similar in that they ARE the government. There is an extreme conflict of interest between the government itself and the people's interests. Both want to expand government, but for different reasons.

    --
    Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
  28. No kidding by FromTheAir · · Score: 1

    The sum of individual choice is the collective choice.

    --
    "an infinite player that has lost his finite mind" ~Infinite Play the Movie (it blends with reality)
  29. Oh Liberal Democratic Party... by Kuukai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They scream bloody murder about how implementing a human rights treaty they signed over a decade ago will stiffle free speech, but it's fine if they do it. Bigotry is okay, but we can't have any "illegal and harmful content."

    --
    Sendou Wave Kick!!
    1. Re:Oh Liberal Democratic Party... by Kuukai · · Score: 1

      One article you link to is by Debito, the other being a 404 link to Debito's website. Just so you know, Debito is a bit of an extremist, so you might want to take some salt with what he says. Also, usually there's heavy filtering done by the author for subjects the author is not very familiar with. A 403 isn't a 404. The picture was still in my cache so I didn't realize direct linking was blocked. Simply refresh and you'll be okay. It doesn't matter which way Debito leans, I was presenting both links to provide references for what I was saying. () The first was an accurate translation of a right-wing book against the Human Rights Protection Bill, citing that the current Prime Minister (a member of the LDP) is against it too, since it would "suppress freedom of expression." The second was the first article I caught on Google that mentions the applicable treaty. The idea that this is hypocrisy was my own.

      Quote: "from the hey-slashdot-jp-what-does-this-mean dept." So, does Slashdot have a Slashdot.jp story on this? And if so, can I have a link? I don't think they have yet, but I wouldn't be surprised if they did.
      --
      Sendou Wave Kick!!
  30. Hey Japan: by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1

    Facism much? :-/

  31. What I'd wonder is ... by jc42 · · Score: 1

    What is the definition of a "news site"?

    For example, if I have a personal site on my home machine, and I put up pictures and a few stories from our recent vacation, does that make my site a news site?

    Will I be regulated as a news organization if I let the world know what members of my family (including the cockatiels and the conure) have been doing recently?

    There are good historic reasons to worry about such things ...

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  32. expatriate != ex patriot by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 1

    a common mistake, but something you should know.

  33. electronic voting on its way in ... by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 1

    so maybe the LDP isn't going to be on its way out for very long.

    I see no news in Japan of the mess electronic voting has made in the USA, just vague references to the foolish Americans not being able to get it right, and the Japanese vendors of course aren't making the same mistakes as Diebold.

    (Oh? Where was the paper trail, even?)

  34. Hiroyuki is still living in Japan by pario · · Score: 1

    Just for your information, Hiroyuki still lives in Japan without problems. There have been numerous civil lawsuits brought against him since 1999 and he lost almost all of them. However, since he basically has no assets in Japan, nobody was able to claim a monetary compensation from him. In one of the cases, it was disclosed that Hiroyuki had a bank account in Japan with a balance little over $1000. Hiroyuki must have earned hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions, through online advertisements on 2ch, but he just doesn't keep money in Japan.

    Personally I am all in support for Hiroyuki. Here in Japan, we cannot have open discussions on many topics due not to government regulations but to social/cultural pressures, so anonymous discussion forums like 2ch.net definitely have a place in Japanese society.

  35. I wonder what they'll make of this website then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh, perhaps this is in response to websites like this:

    The Institute of Delicious Whale Research "This site has nothing to do with the Japanese Institute of Cetacean Research, except for very scientific research purposes only. It would be too complex to explain our research, so you'll just have to trust us there. That we share a similar interest in these graceful, intelligent, fascinating and yet scrumptious mammals is purely a coincidence."

    In other news ...

    ... "The warning comes after Greenpeace tried unsuccessfully to interfere with the refueling of the factory ship Fishin Sashimi. "Despite warnings from the crew of the Fishin Sashimi to 'go away quickly', despicable international terrorists, Greenpeace, placed one of their inflatable boats between the Fishin Sashimi and the refueling vessel and in the process entangled themselves with international news reporting. This was a very dangerous stunt that put lies at risk and did nothing for our cause" Mr. Minoru said. "Refueling operations are ongoing following which our extremely scientific foodological research will continue" he added."

    The "Amateur Whale Reseach Kit" is also available ...

    I guess you need to be following the whaling debate the appreciate this one.

  36. Sorry to interrupt your Japan-bashing but... by coresnake · · Score: 2, Informative

    The only difference between this and what's going on in America is that Japan are doing it in the open . You think the main news corps in America aren't censored? You've got to be kidding me. I'd bet you'd all be spitting and writhing if Japan announced any law even a tenth of how ridiculous the Patriot Act is, you bunch of hypocrites.

    1. Re:Sorry to interrupt your Japan-bashing but... by rhdaly · · Score: 1

      We ARE spitting and writhing over laws like the Patriot Act. We ARE upset over the state of American Corporate news. This isn't Japan Bashing, you oversensitive clod. If you don't want to keep the Internet free - for everyone - that's your business, but don't disguise your apathy as Japanese nationalism.

      --
      0 bottles of beer on the wall, 0 bottles of beer, take 1 down, pass it around, 4294967295 bottles of beer on the wall.
  37. SGI == Church of Scientology by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

    I guess I better add that I've been to the Church Of Scientology chief temple too - on a job interview back in the 1980s. The job interview didn't go anywhere, they really weren't interested in a non-Scino for the job, but the emotions I felt there were similar to those I felt in Shinanomachi and the way they worship Ikeda (like the altar to L. Ron Hubbard in LA) is something I do not care for.

    I have been to the headquarters of both of those organizations and I say they are basically the same.

    1. Re:SGI == Church of Scientology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Woah. Some heavy shit there. Sorry, by the way, for the tone of my first reply - I didn't mean to come across that hostile.

      I *was* dragged to the chief temple in Shinanomachi. Where I *did* see expensive things a good SGI member purchased and the beehive like drone of the chanting scared the living daylights out of me. I was also dragged to other meetings.

      That is strange as hell. Well, I can understand why you didn't like the chanting - that freaks me out as well but it's hardly just Soka Gakkai, they all do that, and Christians freak me out too. But *dragged*? Dude, no-one drags an adult male anywhere. Maybe you were bullied to go, nagged to go, whatever, but you sure weren't "dragged". I have never even been asked to come along. Now I know my single experience doesn't mean it never happens, but it sure combats your single experience and subsequent generalisations!

      I should add one qualifier, though - I (mostly) live in Australia and so most of my experience is with the AU branch of the SGI. It's probably much more laid back than the JP branch. My wife, and pretty much every non-crazy japanese I've ever met moved/will be moving to AU, so it's possible my experience has been skewed from the beginning towards non-crazy laid back japs who can't stand living in japan : )

      I did know before we were married, and I told her, "I accept your religion for you, but I will never accept it myself." (that was after I googled it and spent some hours reading).

      Me too - I knew all about it. I wasn't worried then and I'm not now, it's buddhism like any other. Some people might take it too far. Some people take *everything* too far. Actually, maybe that's one reason i'm not so keen on living in Japan .. hehe

      I'm not a Reiser. She committed suicide after divorcing me (my company sent me to Beijing on an emergency trip to get Turbolinux 6.5 ready and she was convinced that it was a standard salaryman sex tour of Taiwan) and I was told through a third party after the fact and I was never told where her grave was (her family hated me and all gaijin) so I could go there to cry and lay flowers on it.

      Jesus H Fucking Christ. It pisses me off that such people still exist, but yeah, there's a few. Bad luck for getting involved. Was this a long time ago, btw? I only know one person who hates gaijin (except whites, haha, accept your conquerors fools!) and she's 94 this year. Were you out in some fucked up country town? I'm not saying I've always been welcomed with open arms in JP, I felt quite a few times that the niceness wasn't quite genuine, but I've never seen anything like that. And I can't say that all Australians love japanese, either.

      I'm glad you have had happier experiences. I have not and I will always *despise* them.

      Nice attitude. I bet your ex-wife's parents had a bad experience with a gaijin once, and will always despise them! Great attitude huh. Really improves things.

      I guess I better add that I've been to the Church Of Scientology chief temple too - on a job interview back in the 1980s. The job interview didn't go anywhere, they really weren't interested in a non-Scino for the job, but the emotions I felt there were similar to those I felt in Shinanomachi and the way they worship Ikeda (like the altar to L. Ron Hubbard in LA) is something I do not care for.

      Now this is where it starts getting weird for me. Why the fucking hell did you show up for a job interview with the fucking Scientologists. Are you a sucker for punishment? Are you that type of person who just can't seem to avoid trouble? Because seriously .. that's what it sounds like. And what the hell is this about Ikeda? There is no shrine to him at the SGI here. Actually, I've got a cousin staying with me right now and so there's TWO SGI members in this house - no shrine to Ikeda in sight! I have never even heard him mentioned, ever. Sure, he's got

    2. Re:SGI == Church of Scientology by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      That is strange as hell. Well, I can understand why you didn't like the chanting - that freaks me out as well but it's hardly just Soka Gakkai, they all do that, and Christians freak me out too. But *dragged*? That's a figure of speech. The marriage went downhill very fast the Saturday morning she expected me to go to Shinanomachi and I was hung over from a sanjikai with my company the evening before (and she punched me).

      Never mind Christians. That is not part of the discussion. I tolerate all religions, I do not tolerate in the *slightest* proselytism. Period. Maybe you can grok from that where I stand on Christianity.

      Was this a long time ago, btw? Around 2000. Her family was from Ishioka, Ibaraki-ken and I visited there once (after we were married) and she wore a big hat and hood and generally tried very hard not to recognizable when she was with me. When it came time to visit her family, she had me wait around town and the looks I got from some of the people while I was alone still make me shudder. I like Japan a lot and I've had pleasant experiences there, but *not* in Ishioka. This is a separate issue, her family was not Soka Gakkai.

      I bet your ex-wife's parents had a bad experience with a gaijin once, and will always despise them! Well, um, yes and because of her. Her previous "boyfriend", a married(!) Iranian, was one of the most horrible people I've ever had to clean up after, he left her with a huge debt that I paid off. Sigh.

      Now this is where it starts getting weird for me. Why the fucking hell did you show up for a job interview with the fucking Scientologists. This was something like 1987, before they started getting really evil on Usenet.

      And what the hell is this about Ikeda? And I can see that you've never been subscribed to the daily SGI newspaper like I was, nor have you talked to SGI people in Japan.

      The top of the headline page, just about every day is a story on Ikeda.

      What kind of ordinary person considers it significant to announce renouncing nuclear weapons when he is a citizen of a country that does not possess them?

      Hubbard and Ikeda are nutcases.

      I don't mean to sound like an asshole here but your tarring a whole race with the brush of a single experience is pretty bad. Nope. I have nothing against Japanese in general. Under certain circumstances, I'd even consider going back to work and live there. I have *everything* against SGI and I despise them. They are nutcases and they abandoned my ex-wife when she needed them the most.

      Everyone I know who's involved with Japan has a love/hate relationship with the place. Hell, I have that towards most countries including America - which also takes my fingerprints btw. Yours is tending unhealthily towards hate and I suggest trying to get over that or just get out of there, it'll eat you up. It's not. Other things being equal, I'd love to go back and work in Central Tokyo and have season tickets to see my beloved Yakult Swallows and go to the Ryugokukokugikan every few months to see live Sumo. I certainly enjoyed being there a lot more than where I am now. California has been taken over by Nazis and it is far from the place I grew up in.

      I watched Sumo on TV as recently as a couple months ago and that's about as recent as it gets, until the Haru Basho in Nagoya starts.