Slashdot Mirror


Sneak Peek at Microsoft's WorldWide Telescope

Ted.com has a great sneak peek at Microsoft's new WorldWide Telescope project. In this video, presented by Roy Gould and Curtis Wong, you are able to see a combined view of satellites and telescopes from all over the planet and nearby space. The compiled image is rendered using Microsoft's new high-performance "Visual Experience Engine" that allows users to pan and zoom across the night sky seamlessly.

120 comments

  1. who's watching who? by tolworthy · · Score: 2, Funny

    why don't they just combine it with DRM and get the full packages - watching us, watching them, watching us...

    1. Re:who's watching who? by kestasjk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Translation: I wish this had DRM so I could karma whore some anti-MS points.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    2. Re:who's watching who? by rozz · · Score: 0

      Translation: I wish this had DRM so I could karma whore some anti-MS points. Well, since the GP only got karma-neutral Funny points and you got Insightful ones, I think a further translation is needed:
      "I wish more ppl would try to unjustifiably slap MS so I can piggyback on their karma-whoring."

      P.S.
      if I get any karma-points, an even further translation will be needed ... stay tuned.
      --
      "There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
  2. Question: by Smenj · · Score: 0

    How is this different from Google Sky?

    1. Re:Question: by rindeee · · Score: 3, Informative

      From Wikipedia's entry on Google Sky (which sites two articles on the matter): Google Sky is believed to be less expansive than its competitor WorldWide Telescope from Microsoft, which is regarded as significantly better.

    2. Re:Question: by MickDownUnder · · Score: 5, Informative

      I believe it's using the Photosynth engine. I think the beauty of photosynth is that it is a self organising system for seamlessly navigating between photographs that gives you the illusion of animation. Microsoft's system can crawl web pages for material to add to the collage. So it does seem to be better" than google sky as this system will be allowed continue to collect images published in astronomical papers and add these pages to the world wide telescope system.

      Make no mistake about it Photosynth is a world changing technology.

    3. Re:Question: by Beale · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or, you know, you could use Celestia.

    4. Re:Question: by nguy · · Score: 1

      Why, isn't it obvious? It's Windows-only. As far as Microsoft is concerned, that's a big advantage. For everybody else...

    5. Re:Question: by nguy · · Score: 1

      Make no mistake about it Photosynth is a world changing technology.

      Yes, it is, but it isn't new. It's nice that Microsoft has a cleaner and better implementation of it now and that better hardware makes it look smooth, but it's been around for nearly as long as images and networks.

    6. Re:Question: by fmobus · · Score: 1

      Taken from the web, eh? I hope they consider copyright issues then...

    7. Re:Question: by owlnation · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      How is this different from Google Sky?
      Google's doesn't suck.
    8. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Could you give an example?

      I've been working with images and networks for a long time, and I've never seen anything that could even claim to do what Photosynth does automatically and seamlessly.

      Saying that computers *could* do something for a long time is nothing like having a product that actually does those things through a seamless user experience.

    9. Re:Question: by nguy · · Score: 1

      I've been working with images and networks for a long time, and I've never seen anything that could even claim to do what Photosynth does automatically and seamlessly.

      These patents will likely be challenged if Microsoft tries to enforce them; I'm sorry, but you'll have to do your own prior art searches.

      Saying that computers *could* do something for a long time is nothing like having a product that actually does those things through a seamless user experience.

      That's quite right. And their implementation is quite nice. But good engineering and coding doesn't warrant a dozen patents.

    10. Re:Question: by multi+io · · Score: 1
      How is this different from Google Sky?

      Well, maybe the database is bigger. Or not. Oh, and you can switch the view to infrared and radar.

    11. Re:Question: by ScreamingCactus · · Score: 1

      From what I saw in the video, it looks no different the Google Sky, yet the guy sounds like he thinks it will bring a revolution. It's just another Microsoft copy of someone else's idea.

      --
      The path to enlightenment is truly through homemade drugs!
    12. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These patents will likely be challenged if Microsoft tries to enforce them; I'm sorry, but you'll have to do your own prior art searches. You're the one making the claim that this has been done before. Either prove it, mention a company/product, link to something or simply don't say anything.
    13. Re:Question: by nysus · · Score: 1

      Microsoft will give this technology away, which requires their software which you have to purchase additional Windows server software for. Google will give their technology away and as a way to build their brand and reputation and your trust in them so they can more effectively deliver ads to your eyeballs.

      --

      ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

    14. Re:Question: by multi+io · · Score: 1
      So it does seem to be better" than google sky as this system will be allowed continue to collect images published in astronomical papers and add these pages to the world wide telescope system.

      Well, Google Sky loads stuff off various servers all the time as you pan and zoom into the map, just like Google Earth and, probably, MS Virtual Earth or Nasa WorldWind do. So, with the buzzwords stripped, I can't find anything substantial in your post about what's so different, let alone "world changing", in WWT. But maybe that's just me.

    15. Re:Question: by nguy · · Score: 1

      You're the one making the claim that this has been done before. Either prove it, mention a company/product, link to something or simply don't say anything.

      Why? Is this a court of law? A peer reviewed journal?

      I don't give prior art for patent claims in public; it just makes life of the patent trolls easier, Mr. Anonymous.

    16. Re:Question: by Lotunggim+Ginsawat · · Score: 1

      Ok, I am not anonymous (though not the one above). Can you give me a link to a competing product that already does what Worldwide Telescope is doing? Or else you are just trolling?

    17. Re:Question: by nguy · · Score: 1

      That's the wrong question to ask, since the patents aren't just on the "world wide telescope", they are on much more basic technologies. Why don't you actually read them?

      Google Earth does what the world wide telescope is doing. It also does on-demand multi-resolution downloads of image data (as did Google Maps even), which is what some of the patents are actually claiming.

      Oh, and of course, you're also anonymous. But based on your posting history, it seems likely that you work for Microsoft.

    18. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      photosynth is quite cool - like panorama software (for stitching images) on steroids,

      or sort of in-between 2D and 3D... (2.5D ?) with a bit of animation and morphing going on.

    19. Re:Question: by Lotunggim+Ginsawat · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, accusing me of working at Microsoft while I do not even live in America. But anyway Google Earth and Worldwide Telescope did not work the same way. Terraserver, created by Jim Gray (that missing sailor who works with Microsoft) was created even before Google exists. Can you show me where Google is in 1997? Did not exist yet IIRC. Good luck finding prior arts in this one buddy.

  3. black hole by Harlem_Jackson · · Score: 0

    where?

  4. This is an invention? by Gregg+M · · Score: 0, Troll

    So it's kind of like Google Earth, but not as useful. Seems these days, Microsoft is trying real hard to be altruistic.

    Thanks Microsoft for *inventing* this!

    --
    Linux is only free if your time has no value. Windows is only free if you threaten to use Linux.
    1. Re:This is an invention? by jamesh · · Score: 1

      So it's kind of like Google Earth, but not as useful. Seems these days, Microsoft is trying real hard to be altruistic.

      I think maybe it's more like Google Sky.
    2. Re:This is an invention? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Most likely M$ is just trying to get more people to install 'Silverfish', you can pretty well bet that it will be locked to it.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:This is an invention? by MickDownUnder · · Score: 1

      Actually I don't believe it's using silverlight, which is a pity for linux dudes out there because whilst there is Linux support for Silverlight, I don't think there's linux support for Photosynth. Guess, you'll just have to be content with Google Sky ;)

    4. Re:This is an invention? by MickDownUnder · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Microsoft didn't invent it. They bought it.

      I think the thing that really ticks off the tech community about Microsoft, is that they don't really invent anything, they're just extrordinarily good and spotting excellent software early on, acquiring it and then marketing it better than any other company out there.

    5. Re:This is an invention? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Apple had done it you'd probably be singing their praises.

    6. Re:This is an invention? by Metasquares · · Score: 4, Informative

      Google also acquired many of their recent products, including Google Earth. If these big companies want to buy all of this stuff and release it to the public for free, however, I'm not going to complain :)

    7. Re:This is an invention? by mrterrysilver · · Score: 1

      this has been in design at microsoft since 2002. read the paper yourself anti-microsoft-boy: http://research.microsoft.com/scripts/pubs/view.asp?TR_ID=MSR-TR-2002-75

      --
      -mr silver
    8. Re:This is an invention? by naoursla · · Score: 1

      Technically, no company invents anything. It is always people that invent things. Often those people are paid by companies to invent things. Does it really make a difference if they pay the person before the thing was invented or afterwards?

    9. Re:This is an invention? by TheSeer2 · · Score: 1

      Acquisition is a legitimate tool to expand your business, this will sound like I'm avoiding naming names but there are some organisations that really help the open source movement that include several acquired companies... err I think Sun was one.

  5. C'mon..... by Stanislav_J · · Score: 1

    This article has got to be a hose. I mean, Microsoft doing something both useful and cool?

    Well, as they say: even a blind squirrel finds an acorn now and then...

    --
    "Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket." -- Eric Hoffer
  6. Re:oK... by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 4, Funny

    D00d, I luv the way you say "Linuzz" instead on "Linux", and "Abble" instead of "Apple" (even if I don't really get "Abble") but you missed the obvious and oh-so-original "Open Sores" line that cracks me up everytime.

    Back on topic, Google have already done this, Celestia have already done this (and Celestia is free software - sorry, "open sores"), so what's *not* to bash about Microsoft (damn, that should be M$) arriving late to the party? What does Microsoft bring to the party that we don't already have - in spades - already? Fanbois?

    I know, I shouldn't feed the troll, but it was so cute, sitting there under the bridge...

    --
    This is where the serious fun begins.
  7. Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    How is this different from Google Sky?

    Google sky is from Google and the worldwide telescope is from Microsoft.

    hth

  8. Rich-media-immersive-experience! by comm2k · · Score: 3, Funny

    Q. What is WorldWide Telescope?
    A. The WorldWide Telescope (WWT) is a rich visualization environment that functions as a virtual telescope, bringing together imagery from the best ground- and space telescopes to enable seamless, guided explorations of the universe. WorldWide Telescope, created with Microsoft®'s high-performance Visual Experience Engine(TM), enables seamless panning and zooming across the night sky blending terabytes of images, data, and stories from multiple sources over the Internet into a media-rich, immersive experience. Couldn't find the same about Google Earth (Sky):

    Explore the sky with Google Earth

    Whether you're an astronomer or stargazer, Sky in Google Earth brings millions of stars and galaxies to your fingertips.
  9. The Video by aembleton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Curtis Wong explains what you can do, 5.15 into the video. Before that it is a load of boring talk about how it will allow us all to explore the universe and increase our understanding, etc but with some cool pictures of what you can expect to see from the world wide telescope. It will be a free download this spring from http://worldwidetelescope.org/

    I for one, am looking forward to this. I'm sure someone will ask if it can run on Linux. I've no idea, but I can't see it being that hard for Wine to get it working.

    1. Re:The Video by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I especially like the part where it says its the biggest thing to happen to astronomy since Gallileo. I didn't think TED was about cheerleading for corporate Johnny-Come-Latelies.

    2. Re:The Video by typicallyterrific · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know, I'd be surprised if it runs on XP, let alone Linux.

      I'm the "Microsoft Visual Experience Engine" has some core dependency like DirectX 10, or whatever, that is a big pain in the ass to port. (Not to mention, corporate strategies behind Vista and all that).

  10. Looking up now copyright infringement by syousef · · Score: 2, Funny

    In related news Microsoft has issued a press release indicating that users looking up are taking revenue from Microsoft, who now owns the copyright to 100% of the sky. "As we all know DRM is a critical issue today. If people could just look up any time they pleased there would be no need for our new software. Innovation would be stiffled and we have scientists who say the sky might fall." said Microsoft product manager I M ATwat. "For many years we at Microsoft have endured casual astronomers looking up at the sky, and focused our efforts at prosecuting only professionals. However, today we will be launching an education campaign aimed at educating the public about the legal dangers of looking up. We are launching a new tool SGA - 'Sky Genuine Advantage' which will inform the user that piracy is illegal and won't be tolerated. Delivery will be via Microsoft Blimp. We at Microsoft look forward to providing our users with legal computerized views of the sky for a very reasonable price."

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Looking up now copyright infringement by mdenham · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can't copyright the sky; it's public domain to begin with. Can't patent it, as there are numerous examples of prior art. Unless MS is planning on getting into the aerospace industry (always a possibility; watch for falling flaming debris) why would they actually do this? So their programmers can actually see what it looks like outside?

      Also, I want to report a bug with the sky software. Sometimes this giant ball of fire becomes visible, and looking at it hurts my eyes.

    2. Re:Looking up now copyright infringement by fastest+fascist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe they've got sanity projects for their programmers: let them do cool stuff, too, every once in a while. Maybe they just figure it's worth making investments on neat tech without quite knowing for sure what it will end up being used for. If anyone's got enough resources to do that, it's MS.

    3. Re:Looking up now copyright infringement by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      Can't copyright the sky; it's public domain to begin with.

      Take my love. Take my land.
      Take me where I cannot stand.
      I don't care, I'm still free.
      You can't take the sky from me.

      Take me out to the black.
      Tell 'em I ain't comin' back.
      Burn the land And boil the sea.
      You can't take the sky from me.

      Have no place I can be since I found Serenity.
      But you can't take the sky from me.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    4. Re:Looking up now copyright infringement by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      MS has been doing this kind of high concept demo's for years to provide real life examples of tech they hope to apply elsewhere - many people forget the first big mapping/aerial/satellite photography database on the web wasn't Google Maps, or Yahoo Maps, or any of the other big names today... It was Microsoft's Terraserver. (Which is still quite useful because one of it's layers is topo maps.)

  11. Looks bit like Celestia (also free, Win/App/Lin) by Muphry · · Score: 1, Informative
  12. Microsoft strategy inspired by Douglas Adams by LecheryJesus · · Score: 0, Funny

    Firstly they act like a Vogon Constructor Fleet http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vogon_Constructor_Fleet and destroy all competition to their plans...

    Second they try to take over the internet like Infinidim Enterprises http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mostly_Harmless#Infinidim_Enterprises took over the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

    Worse, Steve Ballmer starts performinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vogon_poetry as can be seen here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMU0tzLwhbE

    Now they come up with this... Their very own version of the Total Perspective Vortex http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_Perspective_Vortex

    Rumour has it that after the Vista debacle, MS is going to rename itself to MyCrowSoft and their next OS will be far more powerful than any other ever released. Fully optimised for mobile applications, it will ship in an innovative new format with a shock proof coating of black feathers...

    Apologies for the urls, formatting etc. but I'm not used to this yet.

    --
    Jesus was an invention of the Romans - watch "The Pharmacractic Inquisition" for something more credible...
  13. Searching by Wowsers · · Score: 1

    Microsoft searching for heavenly inspiration on what to do with Vista?

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
  14. The battle against Google goes on by r3f4rd30n · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well, it seems they can't beat Google on Earth, so they gotta think big...

    1. Re:The battle against Google goes on by schpet · · Score: 1

      This looks awfully familiar... http://earth.google.com/sky/skyedu.html/

  15. For 16 years we have provided spin... by mattpalmer1086 · · Score: 1, Interesting
    The technology looks very cool, but Microsoft just can't resist spinning even where there doesn't seem to be any need at all. Check out the FAQ at worldwidetelescope: http://worldwidetelescope.org/buzz/FAQ.aspx

    Q. When did Microsoft first starting looking at the sky?
    A. For 16 years, Microsoft has invested, and will continue to invest, in long-term, broad-based research through Microsoft Research. WorldWide Telescope is built on work that started with Jim Gray's SkyServer and his contributions to Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Sky Server (a portal to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey) was first released in 2001. Aside from the poor grammar in the question, reading that answer just made my skin crawl...
  16. A little about the WWT by gsn · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been very lucky to see this project from alpha to present because one of friends interned with the group and introduced me to them - its gone through some amazing development - I remember seeing this I think early 2007 - it looked more like Stellarium than anything else but just plane black with solid circles for stars and galaxies. It took forever to load images when you zoomed in. Must have crashed about 30 times in a five minute demo.

    Jonathan Fay (of MaximDL fame) showed it off at Table Mountain Star Party last year and they'd moved from that sky to a synthetic pre-rendered sky that would transition to real images from Hubble or other sources as you zoomed in.

    Saw it again at the American Astronomical Society Meeting this January in Austin and really got to play with it since they were right alongside the Harvard IIC booth. It was the first time they were using real imagery for the entire sky and it looked amazing and Jonathan was touting the tour facility.

    Its biggest trick in my mind though you didn't see in the video - one little slider that takes you from the Optical to the Infrared and Microwave and X-Ray sky. Simply blew me away.

    It already supports VOTable and FITS images and dozens of other formats that astronomers use and are becoming standards for enthusiastic hobbyists. You can take your own images and put them up on the same sky as data from Chandra or Swift or the best ground based data from MMT or Magellan or Keck. Now it starts to get really useful. The CfA at Harvard has been digitizing its old plates of sky images, Pan-STARRS will start operating sooner rather than later, SDSS has a ton of data already and LSST will be up in a few years imaging the entire sky every few nights. This is a monstrous amount of data and the system really gives you a way to search through it all very intuitively. I'd love the ability to click on a star in the sky and have all known spectra of it pop up along with references. Not quite there yet but it will be.

    This also makes it the best educational tool. There are projects like Las Cumbres and several schools and colleges have access to telescopes so this gives you a great tool with which to look at data and take your own data and do it in a way that doesn't require you learning how to use NED and SIMBAD and looking for papers on ADS. But I think the biggest thing it does is just blow you away with a sense of how large everything is, or perhaps how small you are in relation and I think that is a very powerful idea. I remember the first time I saw the Eames Power of Ten video - this takes that to a different level and is genuinely thought provoking.

    Quite simply the best thing I've ever seen out of Microsoft.

    --
    Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
    1. Re:A little about the WWT by mbone · · Score: 1

      Its biggest trick in my mind though you didn't see in the video - one little slider that takes you from the Optical to the Infrared and Microwave and X-Ray sky. Simply blew me away.

      What about time ? Is there a means of moving forward and backwards in time ? (A lot of the interest in the Harvard Sky Patrol plate, for example, is that they sample the sky in the past.)

    2. Re:A little about the WWT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. 100 percent BULLSHIT. You have no "friends" at MS, you did like everyone esle, made up a bunch of shit from bits and pieces, and than in a lame attempt to validate your life and draw Karma to your fiction, added "I knew someone...". The only way you "knew" someone was when they super-sized their order at your drive-through window. You're just sad.

    3. Re:A little about the WWT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now all the Linux nut huggers will come out and say they could make a better alternative than this closed proprietary telescope.

      Where are you all....

  17. Not true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...kindly RTFA: it consists of actual imagery, not a model of the imagery like Celestia... (karma whoring: off)

    1. Re:Not true... by TransEurope · · Score: 1

      The guy in the video behaves like he, i'm sorry, Microsoft Microsoft Microsoft, invented the Philosopher's Stone. The only difference between them and a free project like Celestia is, the "scientists" from MS have the money to buy the newest space images. But "new" is something else.

    2. Re:Not true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use Kstars then.
      You can right click on any object in the sky and it will grab from the internet the 1st or 2nd generation DSS images .
      This is more useful in a way, as the ones on the world wide telescope have been stretched/alpha blended/false coloured etc to look pretty and are not so useful for real astronomy.

    3. Re:Not true... by cmacb · · Score: 1

      ..kindly RTFA: it consists of actual imagery, not a model of the imagery like Celestia... (karma whoring: off)


      Yes, but why is this being presented as as advantage over 3D modeling?

      To answer my own question: A program like Celestia allows you to see hundreds of thousands of stars (or however many are in the database you are using). It allows you to "fly" to those stars, turn around and look back at our star from them, or see star configurations that are familiar to us on earth from other perspectives. What a program like Celestia doesn't do is allow you to see other galaxies, or at least it doesn't allow you to interact with them in the same way you would a star in our galaxy. (I haven't used Celestia for a while and I can't remember if they present galaxies as distant points that you can never quite get to.)

      I see advantages to both, but in comparing the oh-wow aspects of the two I think Celestia is a far greater accomplishment, especially considering it has been around for what 7 years or more, and runs on Windows, Linux OS X and without special software.

      This "new" thing from Microsoft on the other hand looks like one more (and I suspect there will be many to follow) inducement for people to adopt Silverlight. Anyone who can't see that needs more than a computerized telescope to help them with their vision.
  18. Mod parent up by The+Iso · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is funny, not a troll.

    --
    "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows." - Bob Dylan
  19. http://www.stellarium.org/ by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    RTFS

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  20. Eh... by pinguwin · · Score: 0

    They lost me reeeeaaaaalllllllll quick on the video. When he said that this project will as profound an impact as did Galileo's telescopes, that's when he lost me. No, I didn't watch the video and this isn't an anti-microsoft rant. I'm interested when it comes out but I don't have time to watch videos that make claims like that. Galileo's invention was universe-shattering and people 400 years later know who he was and talk about him. Do you really believe that in 2408 people will be discussing the WWT? Me thinks not.

    1. Re:Eh... by rampant+poodle · · Score: 3, Funny

      As soon as I heard him say "holistic" I hit the back button. Learned a long time ago the term holistic us usually a codeword for inane bullshit.

    2. Re:Eh... by owlnation · · Score: 1

      Learned a long time ago the term holistic us usually a codeword for inane bullshit.
      Yes. And double the price. Don't forget double the price. That adjective always means more cost.
    3. Re:Eh... by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      >>Galileo's invention was universe-shattering

      Not exactly his invention, suggest you do a little history review. Refining it and how it was used and the observatons discovered by his 'telescopes' are what is important.

      Galileo was brilliant, scary brilliant, but even he 'embraced' and 'extended' technology. I suppose this now makes him a fraud and evil in your eyes?

      PS I don't dispute Galileo's contributions; however, I would make a really good side bet that MORE people in the world know 'Microsoft' than know 'Galileo' - Even though this would be very sad, even though it is probably true.

    4. Re:Eh... by pinguwin · · Score: 0

      I'm aware of history. I also aware that you shouldn't suppose what others think so much as ask them what they think. But enough of that. I wouldn't take that particular bet. But again I ask, in 2408 will people discuss the WWT? If you were to ask someone in that year, 'Who is Galileo?' and 'Who is Bill Gates?' I suspect more would know the former than the latter. Go back and look at the 'top' companies of 1908 and there are relatively few that would be recognized today. I suspect that in 400 years if you were to say to people, "Microsoft", the most common response would be "What's a microsoft?" I just don't believe that the WWT will change our world.

  21. Lame demo or not a big deal by daemonsito · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm not sure if that was just a lame demo, but that "telescope" is really not a big deal.

    It's basically one of the application I already had installed in my Linux box for years, but only with a bigger database. That can surely not be accounted as an invention, and certainly not as big an invention as the telescope 400 years ago.

    1. Re:Lame demo or not a big deal by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You have had an application on your linux box that has access to very up-to-date images of the sky? That allows you to move around seamlessly from one celestial body to the next, shifting the spectrum of the images to view planets/stars as you go? To save a tour and publish it for others to see? Don't get me wrong, there are some decent astronomy packages on Linux, but this is something new entirely.

  22. How is different from Google Sky? by mario_grgic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Google Earth has had something like this for a long time now. Is this any better or is it just an expression of Microsoft's fear of Google and need to "me too" everything Google does?

    --
    As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
    1. Re:How is different from Google Sky? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Google Earth has had something like this for a long time now.

      Not really - because Google Sky is a fixed map.
       
       

      Is this any better or is it just an expression of Microsoft's fear of Google and need to "me too" everything Google does?

      This a) much better and b) you really need to pay attention to who is "me too"ing. (Google Maps, for example, was a "me too" from Microsoft Terraserver.)
    2. Re:How is different from Google Sky? by adpowers · · Score: 1

      If Google Maps was a "me too" project, then it was for MapQuest or Yahoo Maps. I was a big user of Terraserver back in the day, but Google Maps initially launched with just street maps, it didn't have any satellite views. Also, Google was the first to put a really useable interface on internet street maps.

  23. even worse by nguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The guy who founded the company has been filing a dozen patents on obvious ways of doing image zooming and multiple level of detail rendering. Buying the company, Microsoft got the software, the patents, and they also established that the patents are valuable.

    These people are real sleazeballs.

    http://www.google.com/patents?q=Blaise+Aguera+y+Arcas&btnG=Search+Patents

  24. The real question here is by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 1

    exactly how will this help me find and/or download porn? Wake me up when Microsoft buys the guys who invented the worldwide porn telescope, then I'll be impressed.

    1. Re:The real question here is by owlnation · · Score: 1

      Wake me up when Microsoft buys the guys who invented the worldwide porn telescope, then I'll be impressed.
      And perhaps that should never be given smelloscope functionality...? Or perhaps that's exactly what it should have...?
  25. Google Sky vs Microsoft vs Open Source by boot_img · · Score: 1

    This MS product does indeed sound very similar to Google Sky.

    I think the difference between both of these and e.g. Stellarium/Celestia is the database that sits behind them. Usually "planetarium" software consists of a bunch of points for stars, with perhaps a few objects represented by pixels. You can upload images but you have to do it yourself.

    In contrast, Google Sky (and presumably the MS telescope) show you pixels from large databases such as the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. The latter covers roughly 1/4 of the whole sky.

    Google is heavily involved with the LSST project.
    MS has been involved in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey for quite some time via the late Jim Gray.
    Its great for astronomy that both of these companies are competing in an area with little prospects for "monetization".

  26. Jim Gray gone missing by LS · · Score: 4, Informative

    On a related note, Jim Gray, the researcher behind the WorldWide Telescope, recently went missing on a sailing expedition. The search has already been suspended.

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    1. Re:Jim Gray gone missing by aembleton · · Score: 1

      Thanks for adding that. I didn't realise he had gone missing and hope he is found soon.

      A website has been set up as part of the search effort: http://www.helpfindjim.com/

    2. Re:Jim Gray gone missing by sponga · · Score: 1

      After those huge storms up north that sent that massive swell all down the coast of California; I find it unlikely he is alive.
      Still don't give up though and good luck as I have seen his sail boat docked in Catalina harbor before while cruising to shore.

      Sailing must be much more dangerous up north with all the massive ships and quick storms that kick up.

  27. Yeah but... by huckamania · · Score: 1

    I don't see MS using patents as a weapon, only for FUD and defense. I know that's kind of like saying the dragon only uses his teeth when close, but it's still true.

    Personally, I'm not that worried about patents. Being sued usually presupposes a certain level of affluence and comes with the territory. As a citizen of the USA, I'm am worried. The patent for 'Scanning a check and exchanging information about the scanned check' is going to cost everyone money and make a few people rich. It about makes me sick.

    1. Re:Yeah but... by nguy · · Score: 1

      I don't see MS using patents as a weapon, only for FUD and defense.

      Yeah, "defense" as in "if you don't do what we want, we'll sue so long and hard, your investors will run screaming and your startup will crumble". Here, "do" can be anything from "give us a cross-license agreement on your patents" to "sell your company to us".

      And because of cross-licensing agreements, Microsoft doesn't have to worry about any big competitor getting into a big fight with them.

      With competent lawyers and business people involved, very few patent infringement claims ever make it to court.

    2. Re:Yeah but... by EXMSFT · · Score: 1

      Can you find me one historical example of Microsoft doing exactly that? Microsoft has historically used their patent portfolio LITERALLY as a defensive mechanism. When aggressive patent filers/enforcers come out swinging, THEN Microsoft brings out the portfolio, in much more of a "do you really want to pick the fight you think you want to pick"? Microsoft has not employed SCO-like tactics that I can recall. Perhaps I don't remember specific incidents that you are thinking of.

    3. Re:Yeah but... by LS · · Score: 1

      Funny that you mention SCO, as Microsoft was responsible for $50 million infusion to keep them alive. Choose your analogies carefully...

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    4. Re:Yeah but... by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has not employed SCO-like tactics

      Um, Microsoft employed SCO to employ SCO-like tactics, hello? Remember, several million dollars for "Unix licenses", several million dollars PIPE investments by way of Baystar and RBC, etc.

      Not to mention the "nice little operating system you have there, it'd be a shame if we had to enforce any of our 238 patents on it" tactics to spread FUD.

      --
      -- Alastair
  28. child says to parent, pointing at the screen by ionix5891 · · Score: 0

    "mummy, why is that galaxy shaped like a chair"?

  29. so much for: "But you can't take the sky from me" by Locutus · · Score: 0, Troll

    I can't wait til they start changing the constellations.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  30. Re:so much for: "But you can't take the sky from m by RobBebop · · Score: 1

    Are you suggesting burning the land and boiling the sea are also in MSFTs plans?

    --
    Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
  31. Re:so much for: "But you can't take the sky from m by Locutus · · Score: 1

    Are you suggesting burning the land and boiling the sea are also in MSFTs plans? more like already attempted and partially implemented by purchasing competitors only to terminate their product lines along with promoting patent FUD via SCO and then their own IP threats/FUD. So yes, they have been working on burning the land and boiling the seas for quite some time.

    LoB
    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  32. Earlier Autistic Story going around by 955301 · · Score: 1

    I hate to be so reactive to the things I have recently seen, but I wonder what would happen if you exposed this system to the autistic community? It seems like a lot of data that would do well to be digested by someone predisposed to taking it all in at once.

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  33. Finally! by remmelt · · Score: 1

    > Make no mistake about it Photosynth is a world changing technology.

    Finally! The cure for cancer? No? What, solves world hunger? Peace for mankind? Not even a better aspirin? What you say, a neat imaging trick? Your world must be very small.

  34. BSOD by Salsaman · · Score: 1

    I tried it, but all I could see was the Blue Sky of Death !

  35. Re:so much for: "But you can't take the sky from m by Your.Master · · Score: 1

    I've got to try that sometime.

    "Are you suggesting that [bad thing]"

    More like Microsoft DRM Information wants to be free FUD You cannot steal an idea, only infringe on it SCO Intellectual Property is evil P2P They stole Apple's idea and manipulated them into giving them copyrights OOXML Convicted Monopolist! So yes, [bad thing], for quite some time.

  36. Flash?! ....flush..... by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    Call me a luddite, but I really don't like flash.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  37. Statements that are always true by omarius · · Score: 1

    "We can see all the way out to the edge of the observable universe." ...is that so? Amazing.

    1. Re:Statements that are always true by murrdpirate · · Score: 1

      It wasn't true just a few decades ago.

    2. Re:Statements that are always true by omarius · · Score: 1

      Then wasn't the "observable universe" just smaller? Or does the term refer to light that could possibly reach us during the age of the universe?

    3. Re:Statements that are always true by murrdpirate · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's maximum distance we can see without light getting too caught up in the early, dense universe. I guess the observable universe would be slightly smaller back then also, but probably not noticeably. It's kinda strange because it's always been "observable" as in it is potentially feasible to see this light, but we weren't "able-to-observe" until more recently...or at least distinguish it.

  38. Home page by opec · · Score: 1

    Check out the home page of the WWTelescope.

    Is anyone else feeling absolutely creeped out by the "kids react to WWT" video?

  39. I did it for $90 by garglebutt · · Score: 1

    And in terms of user experience, this is different from any of the leading planetarium software in what way?

    --
    Do anything, anywhere, anytime.
  40. Do not want... by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

    Will it run on Linux? No?

    Ho Hum.

  41. Re:oK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sweet zombie Jesus, it's the Anti-Twitter!

  42. *ahem* by Pope · · Score: 1

    I do believe you meant "Sorcerer's Stone."

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  43. Re:Flash?! ....flush..... by Pope · · Score: 1

    Don't worry, it'll all be Silverlight soon enough!

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.