Slashdot Mirror


Large Sheets of Carbon Nanotubes Produced

StCredZero brings news that scientists have developed sheets of nanotubes that measure up to three feet by six feet, and they promise "slabs 100 square feet in area as soon as this summer." The developers see uses for the sheets in electromagnetic shields and airplane construction, and according to the Next Big Future blog, the sheets could also impact the development of solar sails. "The sheets, which the company can produce on its single machine at a rate of one per day, are composed of a series of nanotubes each about a millimeter long, overlapping each other randomly to form a thin mat. The tensile strength of the mat ranges from 200 to 500 megapascals--a measure of how tough it is to break. A sheet of aluminum of equivalent thickness, for comparison, has a strength of 500 megapascals. If Nanocomp takes further steps to align the nanotubes, the strength jumps to 1,200 megapascals."

36 of 155 comments (clear)

  1. Ballistic carbon computing by Prysorra · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Rudimentary quantum computing can be done with the ballistic nature of how electrons flow through a sheet of graphene, or in this case, a carbon nanotube. Expect to see computing related articles.

    If you don't understand what it mean to say that electrons move in a "ballistic" manner through these nanotubes, imagine that cool trick your math teach showed you in high school with marbles and pegs making a bell curve. Now imagine being able to change the outcome by removing a lot of peg, and then making your computer understand the results.

    1. Re:Ballistic carbon computing by hughperkins · · Score: 3, Informative
  2. Re:Awesome... by MiniMike · · Score: 2, Informative

    Probably much lighter than aluminum, for the same strength.

    The question I have is, how strong could it be for the same weight? Off to rtfa...

  3. Forget electromagnetic shielding by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If this stuff is as strong as aluminum, why aren't we using it to actually build things like cars and buildings?

    Has anyone leaked the details of how their process works beyond the little 'teaser' in the article? Could it be scaled down to personal size? Im thinking it would be great to add their process to a home 3D printer.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Forget electromagnetic shielding by dreamchaser · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If this stuff is as strong as aluminum, why aren't we using it to actually build things like cars and buildings?

      Because they are just learning how to create and manipulate such materials? Your question is like a bronze age smith who knows that small bits of iron can be found and worked saying "How come we haven't replaced bronze with this stuff yet?" It's an engineering challenge is all. As production techniques improve it will be easier and cheaper to make.

      Also, note that it's just the tensile strength that is comparable to aluminum. They said nothing about it's shear strength or rigidity.

    2. Re:Forget electromagnetic shielding by Azarael · · Score: 2, Informative

      The property mentioned in the article is only covers one property of the material. Different types of Carbon Fiber are already being used for sports car bodies, bicycles and countless other things. In the case of bicycles, yes carbon fiber allows you to create a light frame, but from what I understand, aluminum frames are still stiffer, more shock absorbent, more durable and most importantly, more cost effective. Until carbon materials can match aluminum in these properties, and in cost effectiveness, aluminum isn't going anywhere.

    3. Re:Forget electromagnetic shielding by kuhneng · · Score: 4, Informative

      For bikes, aluminum frames are certainly stiffer, but they're substantially less shock absorbing.

      One of the reasons carbon fiber is used is the ability to choose different properties on different axes. Many cyclists want a frame that absorbs road vibration (longitudinally flexible) while being as stiff as possible laterally to transmit pedaling force efficiently and maneuver aggressively.

  4. Does Ted Stevens know about this? by longacre · · Score: 3, Funny

    Conceivably now a big truck AND the Internet could be fabricated out of a series of tubes!

  5. Re:Awesome... by Toe,+The · · Score: 2, Informative

    Besides having very different properties from aluminum, and besides the last sentence stating that they can be upped to 1,200 megapascals; this could be considered a proof of concept. Excuse the tautology, but: as technologies develop, they improve.

  6. Availibility by UDGags · · Score: 5, Interesting

    (First off I work in this area) I know one we have tried purchasing these sheets in the past a couple time and have not been able to. They might be able to make them but the availability is still very low for any research or products.

  7. i want one by FudRucker · · Score: 5, Funny

    to replace my tinfoil hat...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  8. Re:Awesome... by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Informative

    One good reason is that aluminum is a limited resource. Although there's lots of it around, current estimates show that it will only last for about 200 more years ( source). That may seem like quite a long time, but it probably wouldn't hurt to start investigating alternatives before we run out.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  9. Re:Awesome... by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe the carbon nanotube sheets are made out of, oh, I don't know, carbon? Seems to me there's no shortage of that stuff..

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  10. MacBook by ack_call · · Score: 3, Funny

    I want my next MacBook to be made out of this stuff.

  11. Re:Awesome... by chill · · Score: 5, Informative

    One good reason is that aluminum is a limited resource. Although there's lots of it around, current estimates show that it will only last for about 200 more years ( source).

    I don't have a copy of that book, so can't read it in context, but I still have to call bullshit on this.

    Aluminum (Aluminium for you Brits) is the most abundant metal in the Earth's crust. While smelting it is energy intensive, recycling it is significantly less so. There is so much that has already been used, and available for recycling, I can't see us running out in the next couple of centuries, if ever.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  12. Re:Awesome... by iluvcapra · · Score: 5, Funny

    People. Carbon nanotubes are made out of people.

    !

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  13. Re:Awesome... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/tables/elabund.html

    Aluminum makes up 8% of the Earth's crust. The earth's composition of carbon appears to be much lower, the same page shows it's 0.03% of the earth's total weight. That doesn't say much of how easy it is to collect either resource, but abundance doesn't seem to be the answer. I think it's the strength-to-weight ratio that makes carbon nanotube materials interesting, but it's still pretty expensive to make.

  14. Re:Awesome... by AvitarX · · Score: 2, Funny

    If we feed them, then there will be even more demand for amluminum. That sounds like a bad idea.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  15. Re:Mistake in Article? by Naughty+Bob · · Score: 2, Informative

    Pure aluminum is soft, aircraft grade aluminum (and virtually all aluminum used in the real world) is alloyed with other elements, greatly increasing its strength.

    Here's a breakdown of the composition of Aluminum Alloy 6061 to give you an idea...

    --
    "Be light, stinging, insolent and melancholy"
  16. Re:Didn't nanotubes explode with flash photography by Loconut1389 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems you're correct correct- do you suppose they've gotten around this?

  17. mass by overcaffein8d · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A sheet of aluminum of equivalent thickness, for comparison, has a strength of 500 megapascals. Thickness, yes, but what about mass?
    --
    Those of us who think they know everything annoy those of us who do.
    1. Re:mass by wizardforce · · Score: 2, Interesting

      density of carbon nanotubes: 2.6 grams/cm^3 density of aluminum: ~2.7 grams/cm^3 mass=density*volume and assuming the shapes are the same and thickness is the same, so is the volume and in this case nanotubes are slightly less dense than aluminum therfore less mass, and therefore lighter.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  18. Aluminum is plentiful, you're thinking bauxite. by ahfoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bauxite isn't even a mineral. It's just a common industrial name for a kind of rock that includes a variety of minerals and is the most efficient way to produce aluminum using existing technologies. Any clay soil contains large quantities of aluminum. When the great clay shortage hits, I'm sure we'll have plenty of advance notice.

  19. Re:Didn't nanotubes explode with flash photography by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 2, Informative

    First off, they don't explode all at once, they explode tube by tube and the explosions are very small. It takes a fairly powerful direct laser strike to cause this to happen. I.E. a hand-held laser pointed at a plane will be about as useful as shooting a BB gun at it.

    Second... I guess you've never heard of... paint.

    And finally... not all carbon nanotubes are created equally.

    FUD.

    --
    I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
  20. Re:Awesome... by kylegordon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Aluminium for you Brits

    Yes, sadly we weren't subjected to the spelling errors of a certain Mr Hall...

  21. Re:Mistake in Article? by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Informative

    tensile strength != toughness. And, unfortunately, aluminum is not particularly ductile. At least, not when compared to, say, steel.

    But aluminum does have a very good strength to weight ratio. Also, it doesn't rust. Instead it forms an oxide layer which prevents further oxidation.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  22. Re:Awesome... by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not sure who Mr. Hall is, or what he has to do with naming conventions and misspellings, but the original name for Aluminum was "Alumium", which got changed to "Aluminum", before going through a final contortion to become "Aluminium". All three versions were created by Sir Humphry Davy, a British chemist, and the process took roughly 5 years so some confusion over the "proper" spelling is understandable. The usage of Aluminum over Aluminium in the US seems largely due to the fact that Websters Dictionary stuck with his second version of the word.

  23. Will it blend? by imbaczek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Determining the toxicity of carbon nanotubes has been one of the most pressing questions in Nanotechnology. Results from various scientific tests on cells have so far proven confusing, with some results indicating it to be highly toxic and others showing no signs of toxicity. This is primarily because of difficulties arising in spotting the nanotubes entering the cells from other carbon-based cell structures such as membranes. A recent research led by Alexandra Porter from the University of Cambridge shows once they are inside the cell, they accumulate in the cytoplasm and cause cell death.
    Carbon nanosmoke. Don't breathe this!

    (source: wikipedia.)
  24. Re:Awesome... by jcaldwel · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm not sure who Mr. Hall is, or what he has to do with naming conventions and misspellings
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Martin_Hall
  25. Not necessarily relevant by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It depends a lot on the properties of the material. For example, while aluminum sheets are made of microscopic crystals, there is little danger of breathing significant amounts of aluminum unless you spend a lot of work processing it into a fine powder first. These sheets may be the same way. Who knows? We don't.

  26. As with so many things... by absurdist · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...you Brits invented the language.

    We Americans perfected it.

    *ducks*

  27. insufficient for space elevator by nguy · · Score: 3, Informative

    So this is 1-2GPa tensile strength. We need about 60-100GPa tensile strength for a space elevator.

  28. Tensile strength likely to be wrong by PeterPiper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I strongly suspect that the tensile strength quoted is actually a typo by the reporter. Either that or he got his facts seriously wrong. It is unfathomable to me how a sheet of carbon nanotubes would be LESS strong than an equivalent sheet of aluminum. And any company that created such a wimpy sheet of nanotubes sure wouldn't be boasting about it.

    --
    Peter
    1. Re:Tensile strength likely to be wrong by aug24 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am not a Material Scientist (but IAAPhysicist so here's my guess).

      The nanotubes are short and straight. Tensile failures will be 'between nanotubes' not 'of nanotubes'.

      As the tubes get longer and better aligned, you'll be absolutely right. (You may be absolutely right already of course...)

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  29. Re:Awesome... by brusk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, AND they'll want to use aluminum foil to cover the leftovers.

    --
    .sig withheld by request
  30. it's a start by spineboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    and it's within 2 orders of magnitude to get there. Not too bad. Shouldn't be too hard to engineer, or tweak it to get there.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.