EU Approves Google-DoubleClick Merger
A number of readers sent word that EU regulators have cleared the Google-DoubleClick deal. "The commission said Google and DoubleClick 'were not exerting major competitive constraints on each other's activities and could, therefore, not be considered as competitors,' and even if DoubleClick could become an effective competitor in online intermediation services, 'it is likely that other competitors would continue to exert sufficient competitive pressure after the merger.'"
Nothing. Google's primary business is still being a search engine. Doubleclick is an advertising framework and analytics (hence google wanting to acquire it). Search engine != advertising framework. Therefore they don't compete. Funny how things work just like they're supposed to sometimes.
So the article is at ... uh, nowhere. The source reveals the link to be: <a>
Great.
Thankfully we have the Firehose submission, which contains the actual link.
So I guess the theory behind subscriptions is that subscribers are paying to catch mistakes like that? :P
You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
But the new Terms and Conditions, to which all publishers must agree to remain in the program, now requires:
That just plain sucks.(A web beacon is also known as a web page; it's a small, invisible graphic placed in the page for tracking purposes.)
However, I'm hoping that a silver lining might be that, if advertising is made more effective by tracking, us publishers might get paid more. But I'm not counting on it.
Request your free CD of my piano music.