Slashdot Mirror


EU Approves Google-DoubleClick Merger

A number of readers sent word that EU regulators have cleared the Google-DoubleClick deal. "The commission said Google and DoubleClick 'were not exerting major competitive constraints on each other's activities and could, therefore, not be considered as competitors,' and even if DoubleClick could become an effective competitor in online intermediation services, 'it is likely that other competitors would continue to exert sufficient competitive pressure after the merger.'"

4 of 78 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Globalization by geminidomino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Considering that Google is based in the USA, is there any reason why they would even need the EU's approval for something like this? Point about the article being nonexistent notwithstanding, the answer is that they don't technically *need* the EU's approval, except that they would probably like to actually do business IN the EU
  2. Re:Did I miss something? by scubamage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nothing. Google's primary business is still being a search engine. Doubleclick is an advertising framework and analytics (hence google wanting to acquire it). Search engine != advertising framework. Therefore they don't compete. Funny how things work just like they're supposed to sometimes.

  3. Nice link by _xeno_ · · Score: 4, Informative

    So the article is at ... uh, nowhere. The source reveals the link to be: <a>

    Great.

    Thankfully we have the Firehose submission, which contains the actual link.

    So I guess the theory behind subscriptions is that subscribers are paying to catch mistakes like that? :P

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  4. AdSense Terms now requires privacy policy by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I publish AdSense on one of my websites. One of the things I've always valuable about it over competing ad programs is that it doesn't cookie my visitors for tracking purposes.

    But the new Terms and Conditions, to which all publishers must agree to remain in the program, now requires:

    You must have and abide by an appropriate privacy policy that clearly discloses that third parties may be placing and reading cookies on your users' browser, or using web beacons to collect information, in the course of ads being served on your website. Your privacy policy should also include information about user options for cookie management.

    That just plain sucks.

    (A web beacon is also known as a web page; it's a small, invisible graphic placed in the page for tracking purposes.)

    However, I'm hoping that a silver lining might be that, if advertising is made more effective by tracking, us publishers might get paid more. But I'm not counting on it.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.