Slashdot Mirror
RIAA Denies Hypocrisy in Royalties Dustup
Hairless ape writes "The RIAA is reacting to a story pointing out the group's hypocrisy in its attempts to have songwriter royalties lowered. The issue stems from attempts to get webcasters to pay fixed royalty rates. 'In short, the contention was that the RIAA wanted to pay a percentage of its revenue to songwriters as its profits have fallen, but pushed for a fixed per-stream when it came to earning money from webcasters.' The RIAA says that's not so, and that SoundExchange offered a similar model to webcasters. Either way, the rates sought by the two groups would have bankrupted many webcasters. 'Now you know; it wasn't about hypocrisy, but one of the seven deadly sins may still have been involved.'"
Since when was hypocrisy one of the seven deadly sins?
Actually at least six of these new seven deadly sins apply to the RIAA, starting with "polluting the environment".
Reduce, reuse, cycle
This might be offtopic, but I'm willing to risk it. There are now fourteen deadly sins.
Article here.
Mgr Girotti named the new mortal sins to be (1)genetic modification; (2) human experimentations, (3) polluting the environment; (4) social injustice; (5) causing poverty; (6) financial gluttony; and (7) taking drugs.So, let's see. The RIAA is certainly guilty of the new 4, 5, and 6. They're also guilty of 3 if you count noise pollution from crappy manufactured pop bands. And probably 7, I think that's pretty much a given too if you read any of their justifications on their behavior.
So, all they have to do is clone Lance Bass and they'll have a hat trick on the new list.
Weaselmancer
rediculous.
Sounds like Payola all over. Maybe we'll get Eliot Spitzer to prosecute RIAA again ... Oh, wait!
Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again.
Perhaps the new deadly sin of "excessive wealth" would cover this as well.
Unscrupulous organization denies blatant hypocrisy. Details at 11.
Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
Even if it isn't fair - at least it is legal. The RIAA sometimes has problems with that, too.
you could/should at least give attribution.
That old joke comes via Mel Brooks in "The History Of The World: Part I"
Practice what you preach...
MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
"Put your message in a modem, and throw it into the cyber-sea." - Rush
...that everyone knows what we already know, people like my mother who think most artists make millions from CD sales will get the picture: the RIAA doesn't care about artists' profit- just its own.
I came into this thread with 10 shiny new mod points hoping to find someone insightful, but found not a single comment in the entire thread worth promotion. What's happened to slashdot? A story on a hot subject, and I see nothing but off-topic trolls and insipid banter about deadly sins taken out of context from the description at the top of the page. Not a single comment on the actual article.
Anyway, the RIAA's attempt to dodge the charge of hypocrisy is equally lame. First the new deal gives ridiculous profit to SoundExchange (30% of gross). And even though they do have a 'plan' to share with artists (an inequitable one, albeit), the lack of expediency is directly adding to the profit of the RIAA through this process. The artists are clearly an afterthought. The RIAA can't come close to hiding their real motivation: profit for its members at all costs, regardless of artists rights/needs.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
I have an idea. Artist royalties should be ZERO, the cost of each music recording should be $100 or higher, the penalty for downloading one MP3 should be the death penalty, and the RIAA should openly keep ALL of the money. That would be in the best interests of both the public and the artists.
According to everyone's friend, Wikipedia, a drug is defined as "any substance that alters normal bodily function".
Using that definition, alcohols would be considered a drug. Of course, food, water, air, and every other foreign object introduced into a body could be classified as a drug. Your normal body function is to die. Taking drugs like food and water alter that and keep you alive. Air has that nasty habit also. I say let's ban drugs and see how long the human race lasts!
Ninjas don't carry tic tacs
bullshit! Darn you to heck you RIAA fibbers!
If they really wanted to foster such a climate, they'd stop wasting their time on the petty pursuits that simply increase their lawyers' billable hours.
Reminds me of a certain "war"... in fact, several current "wars" (hint: they all start with "The War On").
"Press to test."
(click)
"Release to detonate."