The Reality Distortion Field Is Real
TimeZone writes "Apparently, even subliminal exposure to the Apple logo can make you 'think different.' Researchers at Duke University subjected participants to subliminal images of the iconic Apple and IBM logos (during what subjects thought was a visual acuity test), and those who were shown the Apple logo generated more creative ideas after the test than did those who were shown the IBM logo. In a second test, subjects exposed to the Disney logo acted more honestly than those who saw an E! Channel logo." Here's a preprint of the paper (PDF) due for publication in the Journal of Consumer Research.
More apple wankery.
If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
Indeed. This is not a scientific study, it's a bunch of marketers trying to "prove" that what they do matters. Journal of Consumer Research? Surely no conflict of interest there. In other news, a study backed by McDonald's proves that their food is actually good for you! Film at 11.
why? forty-two.
Apple is the new Microsoft, Microsoft is the new IBM.
Horns are really just a broken halo.
Say WHAT ?
This is humour - lay off the "insightful" mods, will you please ? It's starting to erode my confidence in my fellow man...
Simon
Physicists get Hadrons!
My rule of thumb is, unless the details of the methodology used are available and convincing, study means lie.
This program was made possible by a grant from the Ultra-Humanite, and viewers like you.
Seriously, it's in the April issue.
http://www.dieblinkenlights.com
Seeing as how it's all laid out in the preprint linked to in the summary.
Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
Which isn't to say we can measure it with 100% accuracy or that there's no debate still about what it is, what should be included, etc etc. But it's so nice of you to completely dismiss out of hand the very idea of measuring it in any way.
Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
What ? You think peer-reviewed journals are immune to bias ? By their very nature they are biased, because you have a group of like-minded individuals reviewing each other's work. If they weren't like-minded, they wouldn't be collaborating on the project in the first place.
It's quite possible that the test itself was slanted in favor of the desired outcome, if that's the general sentiment within the group. Nothing in this world is purely objective, nothing but math!
-Billco, Fnarg.com
From what I recall subliminal messaging was dismissed as bunk a decade ago or earlier.
Also...Disney...
honest?...come on....
Happiness does not come from having much, but from being attached to little.
When I stare at an Amiga logo, I cry.
(so much wasted potential for such an awesome machine)
The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.