Slashdot Mirror


Blue Lights To Reset Internal Clocks

holy_calamity writes "Researchers at RPI are testing the effects of putting blue LEDs inside cars to keep drivers alert. People driving through the night are much more likely to cause accidents because our circadian rhythms just want to sleep — blue light at around 450nm wavelength can fool them into thinking it's morning and keep them awake."

42 of 332 comments (clear)

  1. Does this mean that ... by Mirzabah · · Score: 5, Funny

    .. there really is justification for people pimpin' their rides????

    1. Re:Does this mean that ... by electrictroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I feel awake because I get 9 hours sleep every night.

      That's the real problem in today's modern world --- people are staying up too late & not getting enough hours sack time. Then the lack of sleep catches up, and they nod off in the office (or worse, their car).

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    2. Re:Does this mean that ... by plague3106 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. We're not birds, you don't throw a towel over a person's head and they instantly doze off. People fall asleep behind the wheel because it's time for them to sleep.

    3. Re:Does this mean that ... by Pope · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Try doing that same schedule when you're 35.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  2. For morning people, maybe.. by threephaseboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    "blue light at around 450nm wavelength can fool them into thinking its morning and keep us awake."

    I'm rarely awake before 2pm, you insensitive clod!
    --
    .
  3. Is this really the answer? by TibbonZero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, I know there are times that we've all had to drive with less sleep than we should have... but is this a good answer?
    To me it would seem to inspire false confidence on the part of the driver, where they might think that they could stay up and not have to worry about falling asleep driving since they had their blue lights blinking or whatever.

    I'm thinking that the real solution is making people in the public more aware of the dangers of driving with too little sleep. Everyone knows they shouldn't drink and drive (yet many still do) but not enough people realize how dangerous driving when tired is.

    Most of all, i hope they don't put these in 18-wheelers are another way to squeeze yet more driving time out of the guys.

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Is this really the answer? by anagama · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So? Some activities make driving safer, some make it more dangerous. Nobody is disputing that driving is dangerous. Driving while intoxicated is more dangerous than driving while sober. Driving while talking on a cell is more dangerous than driving while paying attention. Driving while tired is more dangerous than driving while alert. Everyone understands the danger vs. utility aspect of driving. But there is no reason to exacerbate the danger.

      As for blue lights in the car, I think it's potentially a bad idea. Blue light makes it hard to see in the dark. Red light doesn't affect night vision so much. Besides, I F*#$ing sick of all the blue lights gratuitously stuck all over the place -- like in the front of an otherwise nice quality DVD player. I'm sick of having to tape over blue lights or prop up DVD covers to right this idiocy about bright blue light.

      And as for drivers with those ultra-blue blinding lights, I want to build an auto-tracking fully automatic BB gun (everyone knows driving is dangerous -- anyone remember Deathtrack from the bad old DOS days? loved that game).

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    2. Re:Is this really the answer? by Vskye · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most of all, i hope they don't put these in 18-wheelers are another way to squeeze yet more driving time out of the guys.
      First off, your comment deems that you have never driven a 18-wheeler, Most company's back in the day taught you how to cheat on your log books so you can drive more than 500 miles a day. The first day I was hired, they taught me all of this. They push your ass to drive, and if you don't produce they fire your ass. Some good companies are not this way, granted... but to generalize this isn't a good thing. Ever drive 10 hours, then have to unload a 48' trailer by hand and then pick up a load and get sleep? It's a PITA, and that's why I don't do it anymore. And no, I've never crashed my truck.
      --
      Life was hell, then I discovered Linux...
    3. Re:Is this really the answer? by fractoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Besides, I F*#$ing sick of all the blue lights gratuitously stuck all over the place -- like in the front of an otherwise nice quality DVD player. I'm sick of having to tape over blue lights or prop up DVD covers to right this idiocy about bright blue light. I think a lot of the problem here is that most blue LEDs used are ultrabright models that can comfortably if dimly illuminate a whole mid-sized room, and are far overkill for simply indicating power or status. Designers just whack 'em in because they're the first ones they come across in the catalogue.

      Reminds me of that story a while back where they found out that keyboard indicators for caps/num/scroll lock were bright enough to semaphore a message out of a server room and down the hall.
      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    4. Re:Is this really the answer? by EvanED · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most traffic accidents are caused by sober drivers.

      Most drivers are sober. You should look at the rate of accidents of drunk and sober drivers; I have a suspicion of what you would find.

    5. Re:Is this really the answer? by yurivr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree. But what about emergency situations or military applications? Seems like you could build these right into a HUD in situations where you need to be extra toasty. Day to day, if this takes off it will cause at least as many accidents as it resolves. Your bioclock exists for a reason. I visited St. Petersburg a few years back and experienced 3 weeks of "white nights." I got headaches, nausea and dizzyness after a few days. By the time I got used to it there was night again. It's never about the idea, but the implementation.

    6. Re:Is this really the answer? by epine · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We accept the dangerous because the convenience is worth it.

      I remember back when I played Quake II a lot, I would see a lot of things on the road that would cause a neural reflect to tap the "7" key IIRC which selected the rocket launcher. We "accept" the dangers created by the stupidity of those around us because government heavily repress our primal responses. Man, if I ever became the overlord at the DMV, things would be different.

      That includes those people who think that driving at 50kph over the speed limit entitles them to private use of the inside lane. Look at me, I'm doing 160 in a 110 zone, everybody F'ing pull into the right lane like this is my private German autobahn or I'm going to hang inches behind your bumper pulsing my halogen highbeams like a prolapsed hemorrhoid. I don't feel myself radiating "acceptance", toward your average MF POS.

      If you are decoding my driving behaviour as "acceptance" your powers of perception are extremely dim. The things some people do on the highway done in a wolf pack would see your liver served up as communal pate. Now and then a few aggressive bumper humpers hung from the signage scaffolds would soon set things right. To properly designate the offense, the bumper humpers could be hung with their pants around their ankles. Is Spitzer's wife known to be in the vicinity? No? That must have been another bumper humper. I'm digging, digging, digging and not finding this "acceptance" whereof you speak within myself.

      Back to the subject at hand, I actually *have* non-24 hour sleep-wake disorder, and I can tell you that blue light does not function as described in any research I've seen.

      Both melatonin and blue light have phase response curves with a fixed phase relationship to your daily body temp. min., that varies somewhat from one person to the next. For most people daily min. occurs somewhere around 05:00. A sleep study which captures this marker involves finding subjects willing (and able) to sleep wired up with rectal thermometers. For improved subject comfort, most sleep studies use DLMO (dim light melatonin offset) as a proxy marker instead. This occurs in the mid evening, and is marked by the first detectable increase of melatonin concentration in saliva (which doesn't occur if the eyes are exposed to bright light).

      Blue light exposure in the early morning in the hour *before* your natural rising time will advance your cycle (earlier rising time). Blue light in the evening will delay your cycle (later rising time). To maintain a 24-hour sleep cycle, I require melatonin in the late afternoon and blue light on waking.

      As a side note, the neurons in the retina that detect this blue light and signal phase change to the SCN are independent of the optical neurons. Some blind people retain this sensitivity, some don't (e.g. complete retinal loss). The blind people without this retinal sensitivity often suffer from non-24-hour sleep-wake disorder.

      Both the existence of this retinal cell population and the phase response curves are fairly recent discoveries. I've only been able to successfully treat my condition for a year now (no help from my doctors, I ended up finding the research myself). Prior to that, was two decades where my body clock delayed an average of 1h15 per day. Internally, I was living on Mars time.

      Subjectively, trying to live in day mode while my body wasn't was *exactly* the same as discovering each day that you are now experiencing an extra hour of jet lag as compared to the day before.

      Imagine the suckiest jet lag you've ever experienced knowing the next day it will only get one hour worse, and this will continue for weeks. I would eventually reach the point of total circadian insanity, have a waking period 26 to 28 hours long, sleep for 12 to 16 hours, and wake up feeling great again. The funny thing about those long waking periods: I could code 26 hours straight and not suffer any diminishment in my vigilance contrary to most research (I have

    7. Re:Is this really the answer? by matria · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please let me know when you get behind the wheel so I can make sure to get off the road. The fool who assures himself that he drives just as well when he's been drinking is the most dangerous fool on the road.

    8. Re:Is this really the answer? by CdBee · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "When driving after 18 hours awake you have the concentration of someone who's hovering around the UK drink-drive limit. If you drive after you've been awake for 24 hours, you have the same concentration level as someone who's downed half a bottle of Scotch" - Jeremy Clarkson

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    9. Re:Is this really the answer? by bint · · Score: 5, Informative

      More careful drivers won't drive at all when drunk. Just *my* own experience. As for statistics:

      "For all Americans between 5 and 35 years of age, motor vehicle accidents are the number one cause of death. Over 50% of these accidents are caused by alcohol impaired drivers."

      from http://www.duipictures.com/statisti.htm with the note "From statistics complied by the U. S. Dept. of Transportation and the N. H. Department of Safety." Perhaps there is more to read there.

    10. Re:Is this really the answer? by electrictroy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Riiiight. And now here are the POSITIVE aspects of car ownership:

      - I don't have to live within walking distance of my job (inside Baltimore City) with 1000 people all trying to squeeze into the same building (due to lack of living space/overpopulation).

      - Instead we can spread out to the countryside and find plenty of room to breathe & live like human beings instead of ants (crawling on top of one another).

      - Instead of having to walk to the local market every day, I can buy a whole month's worth of food in a single trip, thanks to my car. That saves time and lets me pursue other hobbies.

      - On weekends I can go visit my parents or friends... something which would be impossible w/o a car. (There's train service, but it takes half a day to travel just 60 miles. The train is inconvenient.)

      I would not want to give up my car
      (a 70mpg Honda Insight by the way).

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    11. Re:Is this really the answer? by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Everyone understands the danger vs. utility aspect of driving.

      you are giving the general populace WAYYYY too much credit. Back when I was a Emergency responder the #1 cause in a crash was people not paying attention. Many times was some moron trying to grab a CD case or other item from the passenger side floor while driving. Others were women putting on makeup, men shaving, etc... From my experience in college with dealing with crashes first hand, Most people do not know that when they take their attention from the road it's dangerous as hell. One did not think turning the wheel, if she was not looking out the window, would turn the car!

      The number of incredibly stupid people out there is increasing at an alarming rate. This past winter I watched a guy lose it on the highway 1/2 a mile up. the snow plume from him hitting the bridge embankment was huge. so I got over and started to slow down. the guy next to me who was looking out the same clear highway and who saw the same thing did not slow down like I did. He ended up as a secondary collision. When I asked him, "Didnt you see it happen?" he said yes, but was in a hurry and though he could make it around him.

      That's plain old, full on stupid right there.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:Is this really the answer? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's a standard drunk driving test that I've seen done many times. I believe even Mythbusters did it once. First, you drive through an obstacle course of cones sober. Then you have a few beers (or some other alcoholic beverage) and drive through the same course. Invariably, you knock over more cones when drunk than when sober. Being intoxicated can wreck havoc with your sense of timing and space, which isn't a good thing when maneuvering a two ton pile of steel at 30mph or more past other two ton piles of steel. On the obstacle course it is just a matter of some flattened cones. On the road, it's a life ended. Is it possible to be drunk and still drive without incident? Sure. However, I still wouldn't say that a drunk driver could ever be considered a safe driver.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    13. Re:Is this really the answer? by salec · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As for blue lights in the car, I think it's potentially a bad idea. Blue light makes it hard to see in the dark.
      I have noticed that most people, myself included, cannot focus their vision on "deep blue" (sapphire blue) glowing signs at night, those remain "fuzzy" no matter how hard you concentrate. Making any displays but the simplest indicator lamps with blue LEDs is ridiculous. However, as long as you give up trying to read them and ignore them, they don't affect seeing other object in your visual field. "Nixie tube blue" (light blue, aquamarine blue) is definitely easier on eyes... and it is also more similar to "morning sky blue", but I am yet to see such LEDs.
    14. Re:Is this really the answer? by westlake · · Score: 4, Insightful
      someone who tends to drive safely when sober is likely to do so when he's drunk as well and excercise even greater care exactly because he's drunk;

      This is loopy notion even for Slashdot.

      The drunk is not in control of anything.

      His response time is lousy and his judgment is worse. It is quite impossible for him to "exercise greater care."

    15. Re:Is this really the answer? by Kozz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Where I'm at in the upper midwest, the phrase "passing lane" isn't quite as common as you suggest. Frequently people just do whatever the hell they want, regardless of lane or their relative speed. I can't say I've ever heard (personally) of anyone being either warned or ticketed for traveling in the left-most ("passing") lane for an extended period. The closest we get to enforcement of this principle is the occasional sign which reads "Slower Traffic Keep Right".

      I once spoke to a moron who said, "I drive at exactly the speed limit, so I am the faster traffic. Those people piling up behind me in the left lane should just suck it up." Speaking to a few friends who are in law enforcement, they said while he may not be directly breaking any traffic laws, they would probably cite him for disrupting traffic flow (or something along those lines).

      There's no monopoly on stupid, that's for sure.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  4. Volkswagen gauges are this exact color by Buran · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Interesting. VW uses this wavelength for its gauge lighting in most of its cars. I always thought it was for looks (as the red/blue combo does look pretty good). Perhaps the blue was chosen to help enhance nighttime alertness as well.

    1. Re:Volkswagen gauges are this exact color by Trogre · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Possibly, though I would still think it a poor choice for lighting instruments. Blue does not focus on the retina very well (requiring more time with eyes off the road to read), and IIRC stimulates rod cells in the eye, reducing night vision.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    2. Re:Volkswagen gauges are this exact color by zazzel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't know if VW used the fact for their marketing elsewhere, but I remember hearing exactly this reason from their German marketing dept. when the blue light was first introduced somewhere in 1997.

  5. Jokes?? by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Q: How many New Yorkers does it take to screw in a "blue" light bulb?

    A: None 'o yo' fuckin' business!

    Q: How many software people does it take to screw in a "blue" light bulb?

    A: None. That's a hardware problem.

    Q: How many televangelists does it take to screw in a "blue" light bulb?

    A: None. Televangelists screw in motels.

    Q: How many straight San Franciscans does it take to screw in a "blue" light bulb?

    A: Both of them.

  6. Re:A third of accidents by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Considering that vastly less people are on the road at night, it's disproportionate.

  7. Another idea: by ChePibe · · Score: 3, Funny

    How soon until they can put this in textbooks? Now that would be handy...

  8. Red+Blue by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 5, Funny

    I find a flashing blue light in the rear view mirror certainly wakes me up.

    Seriously though, it would be better to just not drive when tired. Also wouldn't screwing around with your internal body clock mess you up more?

  9. Great, but what about chips in the windscreen by zakezuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not going to discount the possible correlation between certain wavelengths and sensing it's daylight. But it sounds problematic to me. One blue LED has amazing illumination power, so not only will it likely affect your night vision but it will illuminate all the flaws in your windscreen, as well as enhance the reflection of your self.

    Those of us unfortunate enough to buy hardware with blue leds on it can share this fact, it's damned annoying.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:Great, but what about chips in the windscreen by jrumney · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Those of us unfortunate enough to buy hardware with blue leds on it can share this fact, it's damned annoying.

      Visitors often ask me why my near new A/V equipment is in much worse condition than the older stuff. They think the black insulation tape I've got plastered all over the front is holding it together. It's really just there to block the annoying blue lights from burning holes in my retina while I'm trying to watch TV.

  10. Re:Please place all * light jokes in this thread. by Nymz · · Score: 4, Funny
  11. Re:Please place all * light jokes in this thread. by nebaz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Blue lights are more likely to wake you up not because you think it's morning, but because you think the police are chasing you. One time I was driving, and for some reason was paranoid that there was a cop around the corner and I came across a house covered with blue Christmas lights. That woke me up.

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
  12. Re:Soft red... by Gromius · · Score: 5, Funny

    Same here, red lights dont keep me awake, neither do blue lights on their own. However I've always found that turning on a flashing red and blue light behind me will instantly make me awake and fully alert,no matter what. The effect is amazing :)

  13. The only problem... by Zadaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only problem is that blue light ruins your night vision, which would conceivably cause more accidents.

  14. Re:Please place all * light jokes in this thread. by nebaz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Speaking of sleeping and car jokes, this old chestnut comes to mind.

    When I die, I want to go peacefully, in my sleep, like my grandfather.

    Not screaming in terror like his passengers.

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
  15. Blue wavelengths = No night vision as well by spazmonkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    Blue wavelengths also have the nasty side effect of destroying night vision almost instantly, fooling the pupils to contract - likely for the very same reason it fools the rest of the body into thinking its daylight too.

    Not a desirable or safe side effect when making something specifically intended to be used for driving in the dark. It's why the military uses red lights in their vehicle cabins and cockpits.

    1. Re:Blue wavelengths = No night vision as well by bhtooefr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, there are HID bulbs, which, if they're OEM, should be more white than blue, and should be properly aimed.

      Then there's the aftermarket HID kits, which are often blue. And, there's the blue-coated bulbs, to make people think you've got HIDs when you don't.

  16. Re:optional only please by LaskoVortex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some of us are natural night people.

    Yes we are. Some of us don't think clearly until after the sun has been down a few hours. Some of us have been that way since we were six despite the fact that we were raised by dads who kept us on a military time clock--and it didn't make one damn bit of difference, because we could invert the clock in one day by staying up until morning.

    I have a theory: morning people have a 22 hour internal clock. I have a 28 hour internal clock. When I was a kid, I used to think it was "insomnia", but its not, because insomnia means that you can't sleep. I can sleep just dandy--about 20 hours after I get up. If I get six full hours, I'm wired like a jack russell terrier for a long long time. So I have to live about 6 days out of the week dead tired (4-5 hours of sleep) so that I have any hope of getting those 4 or 5 hours. One day of 6-7 and I need to be up 20 hours to compensate. My clock gets advanced two or three hours sleeping (god forbid) 8, and I spend the week working it back. Friends, this is not fun. Its also not choice, because if I could trade my 28 hour clock for a 22 hour clock (like my wife has) I would in a heartbeat. I'd use those other 2 hours for sleep. 10 hours of sleep per day--that would rule.

    If you study sleep--dig yourself into that theory above. You have some big papers coming your way, I guarantee you.

    Only when I got to be an adult did I realize that morning people aren't "faking it". Get this: they are really rather happy its morning! All that "good morning" stuff--its sincere to them. And you have to lie and say "good morning" right back to them or they won't understand you.

    Also, when I used to drive 17 hours straight (which I've done more than a few times) I couldn't wait for it to turn night so it wouldn't be so hard to stay up. Dylight is hell when a true night person wants to stay awake. If a blue light simulates that and intrudes on my precious darkness, I don't want any part of it.

    --
    Just callin' it like I see it.
  17. Re:Please place all * light jokes in this thread. by glavenoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Brilliant! Quite an illuminating journal entry you have there. Thanks for shedding some light on it!

    --
    I, for one, am looking forward to the inevitable /. beta rollout fallout.
  18. Re:Please place all * light jokes in this thread. by SkyDude · · Score: 4, Funny
    I think this is a bad idea. I mean, when I travel, I sometimes go by bus. Never get any sleep on a bus.

    When I travel by plane, I never get any sleep. Kids yelling, flight attendants interrupting me.

    But, when I'm driving myself, I can fall asleep no problem. Get some of my best shuteye when I'm behind the wheel.......

    --
    == First cross river, then insult alligator.
  19. Re:Please place all * light jokes in this thread. by OutSourcingIsTreason · · Score: 5, Funny

    To me blue lights say, "Attention K-mart shoppers!"

    --
    "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Mussolini
  20. Maybe it's about temperament or self-discipline by SuurMyy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have a theory: morning people have a 22 hour internal clock. I have a 28 hour internal clock.

    This changes w/age. People in their fifties have usually an internal clock of some 24 hrs. Some can have even 30 hours or more at their twenties. Old people can have internal clocks of 19-20 hrs, which is why they tend to get tired early in the evening and then start waking up in the very early morning hours.

    Some of us don't think clearly until after the sun has been down a few hours. Some of us have been that way since we were six despite the fact that we were raised by dads who kept us on a military time clock--and it didn't make one damn bit of difference, because we could invert the clock in one day by staying up until morning.

    In my case I don't think it's really about my internal clock, as you could really time your clock by me when I was a baby, regarding both sleeping and eating. My folks made me get up at 07:00 every morning in the week for the 17 years I lived w/them. Now I'm soon 34, and I have a day off from work, and I woke up at 13:48. Any why ?

    Because it was supposedly so important to watch a few more videos from Beyond Belief 2.0. I went to bed at 05:30 (am), just because I was so darn stubborn to keep on watching the videos about a subject that I found highly interesting. I actually played solitaire for the last few hours just to keep myself active so that I don't get too sleepy.

    My theory is that at least some of the so-called night people are just like me: They're too intensive, too driven and too interested in things to let go of the day - it's like every day you go to bed it's a little death. And don't get me wrong, it's wonderful to get there when you're really tired, but the thing is that I still don't want to go to bed at night. I can say that to me going to bed feels like a punishment every and each day, and I drag it off for as long as I just can. If I didn't do this, I'd probably be more effective many days, because I would've slept as much as I really needed, had I gone to bed in good time.

    I have a friend who has an intensively driven personality just like me, and he tends to do just the same things - stay awake just for the sake of it, like I guess we did when we were children. It was just so much fun to be able to stay up after your bedtime. Maybe this is in part is an effect of how we're brought up. Some Freudian would surely conclude that I want to stay up every night just to defy my parents who always put me to bed when I was a child.

    Only when I got to be an adult did I realize that morning people aren't "faking it". Get this: they are really rather happy its morning! All that "good morning" stuff--its sincere to them. And you have to lie and say "good morning" right back to them or they won't understand you. Well, if I wasn't always tired in the morning w/having to get to work, maybe I'd feel better about mornings, too. As it is, I pay the price for not going to bed in time especially in the mornings.
    --
    The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne