Slashdot Mirror


Buckyballs Can Store Concentrated Hydrogen

Pickens brings news that researchers from Rice University have discovered that it's possible to store hydrogen inside buckyballs. Hydrogen can be an excellent power source, but it is notoriously difficult to store. The buckyballs can contain up to 8% of their weight in hydrogen, and they are strong enough to hold it at a density that rivals the center of Jupiter. "Using a computer model, Yakobson's research team has tracked the strength of each atomic bond in a buckyball and simulated what happened to the bonds as more hydrogen atoms were packed inside. Yakobson said the model promises to be particularly useful because it is scalable, that is it can calculate exactly how much hydrogen a buckyball of any given size can hold, and it can also tell scientists how overstuffed buckyballs burst open and release their cargo."

38 of 193 comments (clear)

  1. A point worth making- by Naughty+Bob · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and they are strong enough to hold it at a density that rivals the center of Jupiter.
    Something the summary doesn't make clear is that Buckyballs are much more convenient in portability terms, as compared with Jupiter.
    --
    "Be light, stinging, insolent and melancholy"
    1. Re:A point worth making- by JoeInnes · · Score: 2, Funny

      Summary doesn't make it clear, because it's not true. If you have enough buckyballs to hold as much hydrogen as the centre Jupiter, they'll be just as inconvenient to pop in your briefcase.

      However, it is probably easier to stuff buckyballs with hydrogen than trying to cut off pieces of Jupiter.

    2. Re:A point worth making- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also for those of you more familiar with the US measurement system (rather than the SI units): The pressures we're talking about here is almost 200 million library of congresses per VW Beetle.

    3. Re:A point worth making- by oni · · Score: 2, Informative

      as much hydrogen as the centre Jupiter,

      So what you're saying is that you don't understand the difference between density and volume.

  2. Hmmm. by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it can also tell scientists how overstuffed buckyballs burst open and release their cargo."
    Well, if these are being burst open, then it means that these have to be built AND loaded each time, and then disposed. So now, we are going to either break apart water (cool, but inefficient), or strip H from fossil fuel (efficient, but bad news for the CO2). Then we are going to build bucky balls, store the hydrogen in it (at 8% volume), sell you the buck ball, your car will magically break the balls (most likely pressure or heat), this will power either an ICE (very low efficiency) or a fuel cell/electric motor (high efficiency, but high cost due to fuel cell).

    Of course, we could just take the electricity and charge a battery and then run an electic motor, all at more than double (or even triple) the efficiency and probably half to one third the costs.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Hmmm. by mudetroit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am in know way saying that this is a perfect solution, but a carrying method for using hydrogen as a fuel is a better long term alternative for us then batteries storing electrial energy.

      The fundamental problem with batteries is that sooner or later the chemical process that you are taking advantage of breaks down and you are left with a battery that no longer functions. As most batteries, actually all the ones I am aware of, are made with particularly noxious chemical compounds now you have the problem of what to do with the no longer functional battery. Let's review the common options:
      1.) Burn it - Not so great for the air.
      2.) Toss it in a landfill - Sooner or later even the best toxic landfills develop leaks. Not so great for the land or water.
      3.) Recycle it - Typically involves large amounts of energy with some nasty chemical by products. Again not so great for land, water, or air depending non where the byproducts go.

      Hydrogen, unless someone can present evidence to the contrary, almost has to be our portable energy source of the future. And if you consider fusion reactors as our best fixed source of energy then it is really the energy source in that case as well.

    2. Re:Hmmm. by Bloodoflethe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Point of contention. I believe you meant to say that the difference in weight is a factor of 12.

      Either way you slice it, the weight of a container is always much greater than the weight of the compressed gas within it. In fact the best weight I've seen for a compressed hydrogen container is 6% of the container's (including the hydrogen) overall weight. This buckeyball is about 7.5% (8/108). That's a fairly significant increase in storage capacity.

      --
      "Little is much when little you need."
  3. That's nice and all... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 4, Insightful


    ...but each burst buckyball is 60 carbon atoms floating around in your fuel. Aren't you right back to "hydrocarbons" if you burn this fuel, and won't the carbon poison fuel cell membranes? It's a cool trick _iff_ you can strip the carbon out efficiently before the hydrogen is used.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    1. Re:That's nice and all... by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 3, Informative

      No prob. The issue here is finding an (energy-)efficient / easy way to make the buckyballs store and release hydrogen. But once the hydrogen is released, I can't imagine it would be hard to separate 2-atom hydrogen molecules from 60-atom buckyball molecules. Or find a way to do so.

      Some hints: at room temperature, buckyball molecules may behave as solid or liquid-like material, or be dissolved in other liquids, while hydrogen is a thin gas. And buckyball molecules come in different sizes (number of C-atoms).

      Summarized: the carbon here should be regarded as a carrier, not part of the fuel.

    2. Re:That's nice and all... by Farmer+Crack-Ass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The biggest expense of nuclear power is not the fuel, but the extreme initial capital cost for building the plant. Fuel is actually a pretty small fraction of the cost for nuclear power - the price of fuel could double and the KWh cost would rise very little.

  4. So All We Really Need... by camperdave · · Score: 5, Funny

    So all we really need is a really big buckyball, and we've solved the hydrogen storage problem.

    Of course, we still need to figure out how to get the soft gooey hydrogen inside the chocolatey pocket of the buckyball, especially at "center of jupiter" pressures. Maybe the folks at Cadbury might reveal their secret. We'll also need to figure out how to get the hydrogen out once we're ready to use it.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  5. Clearly I'm missing something by hanshotfirst · · Score: 4, Insightful

    An alternative to carbon-fuel which requires storing that alternative in carbon?

    Once you crack those buckeyballs open to get the H out, the C has to go somewhere, right?

    What am I missing, here?

    --
    Why, oh why, didn't I take the Blue Pill?
    1. Re:Clearly I'm missing something by oxidiser · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're comparing apples and oranges here. The buckyballs DO contain carbon, but that fact alone does not make them dangerous to the environment. Carbon as fuel is bad because it gives off CO2 as a byproduct of burning. In this case the carbon is just the container, the hydrogen is the fuel. Unless of course I'm missing something, which is entirely possible.

  6. 8%? Why, that's more than half as good as octane! by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Otherwise known as gasoline.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  7. Read the Warning... by ayjay29 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pregnant women, the elderly and children under 10 should avoid prolonged exposure to Hydrogen Filled Buckyball.

    Caution: Hydrogen Filled Buckyball may suddenly accelerate to dangerous speeds.

    Hydrogen Filled Buckyball contains a liquid core, which, if exposed due to rupture, should not be touched, inhaled, or looked at.

    Do not use Hydrogen Filled Buckyball on concrete.

    Discontinue use of Hydrogen Filled Buckyball if any of the following occurs: Itching, Vertigo, Dizziness, Tingling in extremities, Loss of balance or coordination, Slurred speech, Temporary Blindness, Profuse sweating, Heart Palpitations.

    If Hydrogen Filled Buckyball begins to smoke, get away immediately. Seek shelter and cover head.

    Hydrogen Filled Buckyball may stick to certain types of skin.

    When not in use, Hydrogen Filled Buckyball should be returned to its special container and kept under refrigeration... Failure to do so relieves the makers of Hydrogen Filled Buckyball, Wacky Products Incorporated, and its parent company Global Chemical Unlimited, of any and all liability.

    If Hydrogen Filled Buckyball should become soiled, wipe gently with a soft cloth moistened with sulfuric acid.

    Ingredients of Hydrogen Filled Buckyball include an unknown glowing substance which fell to Earth, presumably from outer space.

    Hydrogen Filled Buckyball has been shipped to our troops in Saudi Arabia and is also being dropped by our warplanes on Iraq.

    Do not taunt Hydrogen Filled Buckyball.

    Hydrogen Filled Buckyball comes with a lifetime guarantee.
    Hydrogen Filled Buckyball. ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  8. Exotic pressures by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the nuclear fuels field, we deal with really exotic temperatures and pressures in materials whose bulk properties might be only two or less orders of magnitude from standard temperature and pressure. Did you know that there are people sitting around, calculating the pressure of an individual helium atom in a crystal lattice? The pressures that arise put planetary cores to shame.

  9. That's Nice by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Could densely packed hydrogen be encouraged to fuse somehow? Perhaps with some sort of "laser"?

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  10. The rest of the press release by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Professor, that's amazing! The buckyballs will bind the hydrogen so well that it won't leak out of the container?"

    "That's correct. We're very pleased with these results."

    "And to release the hydrogen to be able to use it, you just crack open the buckyballs, right?"

    "I beg your pardon? No, no, it's bound extremely tightly to the carbon matrix. That's what we've developed, a way to bind hydrogen."

    "But to actually use the hydrogen, professor, you have to get it back out. How do you get it out of the buckyballs?"

    "Ah, well, that's something that we'll address in year 4 of the grant."

    "Which is...?"

    "2011."

    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
  11. Don't you mean "could" store hydrogen? by Fysiks+Wurks · · Score: 5, Informative

    Let's RTFA a bit: "'Based on our calculations, it appears that some buckyballs are capable of holding volumes of hydrogen so dense as to be almost metallic,' said lead researcher Boris Yakobson"..." If a feasible way to produce hydrogen-filled buckyballs is developed, Yakobson said, it might be possible to store them as a powder."

    What a difference one word can make in a summary. News flash, "Miss Universe can have sex with Slashdot users! According to simulations conducted with fold-out pictures in Randy's basement..um...research center"

    The simulation work is pretty cool, the headline and summary can and does mislead the reader.

    --
    P226
  12. Not true! They will be VERY convenient for a bit. by clonan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I haven't run the math, I think if you compress the hydrogen in Jupiter's core down to briefcase size you will find that it will keep going and form a nice little singularity....very easy to fit in a briefcase....shortly before it EATS the briefcase and then you...

    Back of envelope math:

    One earth mass will form a singularity at around 10 CC (or so I've heard)

    Jupiter's core is about 10 earth masses (or so I've heard)

    Ergo one Jupiter core will form a singularity at about 100 CC.

    A small briefcase will hold 100 CC plus a little extra.

    Only one questions remains...how will we get the core of Jupiter to LOOK like the report I was supposed to read last night?

  13. Pumping Gas by infonography · · Score: 2, Funny

    My question is how to you stick the nozzle in from the gas pump. And when will it work in my Hummer? Will they start installing Electron Microscopes at Chevron?

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  14. Re:8% weight is a bad way to put it by gm0e · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Like it or not, percent weight is the common metric to compare hydrogen storage methods. Around 6% by weight, the energy/mass ratio of molecular hydrogen is in the ballpark of gasoline, so 6% is the target you hear all the hydrogen storage scientists talking about. Of course what weight percent sweeps under the carpet are the important issues like stability after many charge/discharges, energy required per cycle, and the operating temperature range. Anybody claiming near or over 6% is cutting major corners on one of those areas. In this case, the buckyball bursting open to release H2 is not an easily reversible step so it will have a lifetime of exactly one discharge before the leftover carbon has to be reclaimed and re-packed with H2.

    As someone who does model calculations involving buckyballs myself, this is a very intriguing calculation. But if I showed this to my buddies down the hall who do fullerene chemistry, they would have a few questions about how they are supposed to pack that much H2 in a fullerene and then scale the process industrially.

  15. How about fusion instead of fuel cells... by clonan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Everyone assumes that these will be used for fuel cells, but why not use them for fusion?

    I know one technique has been laser fusion. Target several lasers at one point and they reinforce each other. Then drop in a tiny sphere of fusion fuel surrounded by glass of plastic and the lasers cause the sphere to exploded both outward and in which increases the pressure enough to cause fusion.

    This concept has to be more efficient with a VERY high pressure fuel. So we give our packed buckyballs a charge and electromagnetically shoot them into the center of the lasers and POOF you have fusion..

    Just a thought, any comments?

  16. Re:Not true! They will be VERY convenient for a bi by TheHawke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One thing is that theoretics will blow singularities out the window. One theory holds that Jupiter's core is a solid mass of crystallized carbon. Yep, you can guess what that is, Diamond. Another theory, with a more stable foundation, is that hydrogen at that pressure and temperature, becomes metallic. Essentially within your little buckyball, you would have a sphere of hydrogen metal. If your buckyball can handle > 100GPa,(over one million atmospheres) then the hydrogen atoms will undergo a phase change and become metallic.

    If this is practical and it's energy potential can be tapped, we'll have at our fingertips, an unlimited power source that won't kill you with radiation.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  17. Re:Not true! They will be VERY convenient for a bi by ArcherB · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...If your buckyball can handle > 100GPa,(over one million atmospheres)... If your buckyball can handle > 100GPa,(over one million atmospheres), then you should just be able to inject a few under a piston, release the pressure and use the released pressure to drive your engine.

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  18. H, a power source by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Hydrogen can be an excellent power source

    Hydrogen is more of a battery than a fuel and it is ALWAYS by DEFINITION going to have negative ER/EI. Why? Because the energy required to pull hydrogen out of water or methane or petroleum is going to be greater than the energy you get from burning the hydrogen. What the "hydrogen economy" seeks to do is to protect the sunken cost of the suburbs, and the sunken costs of the automotive infrastructure, both of which are joined at the hip and are completely unsustainable. It's a fools errand and will fail. There is also the not inconsiderable energy that goes into making the bucky balls, etc.

    Face it: gigs up. Game over. Prepare to slowly powerdown.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  19. Here's How They Work (Informative!) by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Okay, no one in a modded-up post on this story understands the concept. Buckyballs look like soot. You have a tank filled with this soot in your car. Then you flow very high pressure hydrogen gas over them for awhile (this has been done for years with carbon nanotubes, which offer more storage but because they only confine in 2 dimensions, unlike the balls, they don't provide the capillary forces necessary to make this easy). Hydrogen then adsorbs (notice ADsorbs, not ABsorbs) onto the inner surfaces of the Buckyballs. Capillary forces, like those that cause liquid to be drawn into a straw, allow the hydrogens to live essentially as liquids inside the balls, meaning that when you remove the high pressure hydrogen flow, the hydrogren in the buckyballs doesn't all immediately fly out. Hydrogen leaks out of the balls slowly, becoming a gas and maintaining a roughly constant pressure in the tank, and you then siphon off the hydrogen that you want to power your car. You can control the leakage rate by changing the temperature.

    You then reuse the Buckyballs by flowing hydrogen gas over them when they're empty. They're 100% reusable storage, not tiny gas tanks. Someone mod this up so that the dozens of "oh nos, Buckyballs hurt teh environments" posts go away.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    1. Re:Here's How They Work (Informative!) by mapsjanhere · · Score: 4, Informative

      You will reach an equilibrium pressure in your tank at which adsorption and desorption occur at the same speed. The big question here is kinetics anyway. How fast does the hydrogen adsorb, and how fast can it be released? The whole idea only becomes practical if you can "fill your tank" in a reasonable time and with decent equipment requirements, lets say 5 min at 2000 psi. And the release has to be fast enough to allow an engine to generate 100 kW or so without depleting the hydrogen flow (or needing a m^3 of tank).

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    2. Re:Here's How They Work (Informative!) by Gryphia · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oops. Wasn't logged in. So no one will see the previous comment, I'm sure. Wrong. What you are describing is how you load hydrogen into the pores between buckyballs in a C60 crystal. What this article describes is theory based on hydrogen loaded inside a single buckyball cage. Due to the pore size (basically it's a C6/C5 ring, depending on where you are on the buckyball), you can't load hydrogen into the cage of a buckyball. To get hydrogen inside a buckyball, you actually have to synthesize the buckyball with hydrogen in there (at least, at this point. No one has a better way to do it). This has been done for a single hydrogen molecule. Being able to do it for the pressures they are talking about . . . is nowhere on the horizon. The gas adsorption method that you describe is typical, but it's not what we're talking about in the case. It was shown a while back (FitzGerald et al, Phys. Rev. B, 65, 2002) that the kinetics of the situation are just absurd. It takes hours to reach an equilibrium loading situation at room temperature, and even that is only about 1 H2 per C60 (I'll let you do the math, but 1 C is ~ 6 times as massive as an H2, so the loading by volume . . . is very low). C60 through traditional gas adsorption has no potential to store hydrogen for commercial purposes. These days, much attention is being focused on metal organic frameworks (MOFs), which operate by similar methods, but hold much more C60 by weight (~10% for the best) . . . the problem is the binding energies are still so low that they don't hold hydrogen at room temperature very well at all.

    3. Re:Here's How They Work (Informative!) by cupofjoe · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd like to second Colonel Korn on this one (I've certainly never written THAT before); the concept of reusable hydrogen storage materials is not a new one. It's devilishly difficult, of course, but not new. Check out http://hydrogen.energy.gov/ to see what's been done so far.

      Buckyballs, like carbon nanotubes (CNTs) before them, store hydrogen by physisorption, whereby hydrogen molecules (not atoms, usually) "stick" to the near-surface via van der Waals forces (or equivalent). The issue with CNTs, of course, is that they really didn't do it as well as folks had hoped (or originally thought; there was some controversy over this). Overall, physisorption systems (the AD- vs. AB-sorption that the parent was referring to) don't do as well as chemisorption systems like metallic hydrides, though. The peak capacities are something like 3-6% vs. 12-15%, respectively.

      But let's not mince words here; the real key issue in this case is that the nice folks at Rice have RUN A MODEL. They haven't done any empirical work to determine whether this actually works. If you've been keeping score here, that's where the rubber meets the road. Personally, I'm not holding my breath on the claimed 8% number.

      After working in this field for a while, I've noticed that these kinds of claims appear at regular intervals (usually from universities with good media departments) regarding "miracle materials" that store tons of hydrogen. Don't get me wrong; any active thinking is progress - but let's be productively skeptical, eh?

      To Rice's PR department: good show, but I don't buy it. Sorry for the cynicism.

      Cheers,
      --joe.

  20. Re:Not true! They will be VERY convenient for a bi by ukemike · · Score: 4, Informative

    If this is practical and it's energy potential can be tapped, we'll have at our fingertips, an unlimited power source that won't kill you with radiation. It astonishes me how often /.ers forget the first and second law of thermodynamics. You'll only have the unlimited source of energy after you expended the same amount of energy (and more) generating and compressing the hydrogen to get it into the buckyballs in the first place.

    Wake up world. Hydrogen isn't a source of energy any more than capacitors are. It's a way to store energy.
    --
    -- QED
  21. Leaks by YetAnotherBob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, you have a system that can store hydrogen in carbon balls at high pressures. (the cold fusion folks manage to get 6000 pascals or so inside a metal lattice chemically.) What I want to know is how long can you store it. Hydrogen leaks through anything. the atoms fit BETWEEN the molecular bonds in most metals, plastics, even wax. That's the reason that space rockets are refueled constantly. (boil off of something that boils at 4 Kelvin is really something too!) The tanks leak!

    What is the half life of the hydrogen storage in this system?

    So, if the buckyball left the factory last month, how much H2 content will it still have? Once it decays down to atmospheric temperature, it does me no practical good.

    --
    Everybody knows 3 people with my name.
  22. Re:Not true! They will be VERY convenient for a bi by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, this seems to be purely theoretical work about whether buckyballs *could* contain dense hydrogen, not how to achieve it. However, I can think of two very interesting possibilities, energy-wise, if it could be achieved.

    1) Superconductivity: Metallic hydrogen is a superconductor. Not sure how that would work conducting current through the shells, though. While just being a superconductor doesn't give you energy, it makes it easier to transmit energy.

    2) Fusion is all about the combination of the density of your targets and energy of your collisions. This is some impressive hydrogen density being discussed.

    --
    That was either the start of something bad or the end of something stupid.
  23. Re:8% weight is a bad way to put it by drooling-dog · · Score: 3, Funny

    How about this, then:

    Store the hydrogen at atmospheric pressure in a large, oblong balloon-like vessel, and strap your vehicle underneath it. You not only have a fuel source, but you have buoyancy as well and can soar above the traffic. We'd finally have those flying cars they've been promising us.

    Oh, the humanity!

  24. Comparing to pyrene by vuo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Pyrene is a hydrogen transfer catalyst that can contain 0.99% hydrogen if hydrogenated to 4,5-dihydropyrene. I did the same H2 content calculation for C60 and found that the current state of the art, one H2 in one fullerene or C60@H2, is 0.28% hydrogen. To be better than pyrene, you need to put in eight hydrogen atoms as four H2 molecules, or C60@4H2. To give that 8% storage capacity you need not less than 62 hydrogens, or C60@31H2. That's slightly more than one hydrogen per one carbon, which is a lot. (Gasoline is 16% hydrogen, btw.)

    The major problem with this "discovery" (it's just a calculation, I'd say) is that you'll need to design a chemical synthesis that forces metallic hydrogen into a buckyball, without inducing hydrogenolysis (spontaneous production of hydrocarbons from hydrogen and carbon). Then you should be able to design molecular "hatch" that you can open and close while being under this enormous hydrogen pressure. A small obstacle to this being that I suspect nearly any heteroatom you'd need for the hatch would be immediately torn off by hydrogenolysis. My guesstimate would in fact be that the fullerenes themselves would be hydrogenolyzed on contact with metallic hydrogen. As you can see, it's the physicists and their phyucher flying cars again. It's interesting but no real problem has been solved.

    And also, the problem of producing the hydrogen is still unsolved, no matter the hype. The problem that we want a reducing agent (H2), which unavoidably requires energy to produce. The major options are fossil and nuclear; the world runs out of arable land area if we try to produce it by agriculture. Actually the situation can be summarized like this:

    1. Invent technologies to transport or spend existing hydrogen (fuel cells, hydrogen storage, etc.)
    2. ???
    3. Hydrogen economy!

  25. Re:Not true! They will be VERY convenient for a bi by amRadioHed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Pedantically speaking oil isn't an energy source either, it's just a storage medium for solar energy.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  26. Re:Not true! They will be VERY convenient for a bi by xtal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We have, already, an unlimited source of energy in the Sun. The real problem is how to transport and condense that energy into useful-to-us forms..

    --
    ..don't panic
  27. Re:Not true! They will be VERY convenient for a bi by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...an unlimited source of energy in the Sun. I understand why you would say this, but you think too small for my tastes. The Sun doesn't contain enough energy in total for some of my more grandiose schemes.
    --
    a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)