Slashdot Mirror


Nuclear Scanning Catches a Radioactive Cat On I-5

Jeff recommends Seattle Times columnist Danny Westneat's story from a community meeting with Northwest border control agents. Seems their monitoring for dirty bombs from the median of Interstate 5 caught a car transporting a radioactive cat. "It turns out the feds have been monitoring Interstate 5 for nuclear 'dirty bombs.' They do it with radiation detectors so sensitive it led to the following incident. 'Vehicle goes by at 70 miles per hour... Agent is in the median, a good 80 feet away from the traffic. Signal went off and identified an isotope [in the passing car]. The agent raced after the car, pulling it over not far from the monitoring spot.' Did he find a nuke? 'Turned out to be a cat with cancer that had undergone a radiological treatment three days earlier.'"

33 of 594 comments (clear)

  1. I know the name of its owner.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Schrodinger

    1. Re:I know the name of its owner.... by LaskoVortex · · Score: 5, Funny

      What was the cat's state?

      Washington--which is a quantum superposition between Oregon and Canada.

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
    2. Re:I know the name of its owner.... by piemcfly · · Score: 5, Funny

      wait, that was supposed to say

      'catatomic'

      ... and he ruins his own joke as usual.

    3. Re:I know the name of its owner.... by scubamage · · Score: 5, Funny

      Its state doesn't matter, because it changed when it was observed. My guess is either alive or dead.

  2. Lolcat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Schrödinger cat is not amused

    1. Re:Lolcat by tubapro12 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Schrödinger's cat is not amused—maybe.
      There, I fixed that for you.
    2. Re:Lolcat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      How about this?

  3. Ha, ha by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now, how do you explain that you've just had radiation treatment to the mindless TSA buffoon who's found you're radioactive?

    --
    Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    1. Re:Ha, ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why should I explain the details of my cancer treatment to some TSA agent? My medical history is private and should be protected by law from unnecessary disclosure.

    2. Re:Ha, ha by budgenator · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When I had a cardiac stress stress test there was a sign that informed patients that cross the boarder would trigger radiation detectors for at least three days. I work in a dental office and we are the only office that accepts the DHS's dental plan so we have many patients that are Customs Agents, he told me it took the Canadians 3 days to get their trash cleaned up enough to get it across the boarder without triggering the detectors.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    3. Re:Ha, ha by GooberToo · · Score: 5, Informative

      if you have to travel home to be in hospice near your family.

      I'm just throwing this out there. I know this is somewhat off topic. Just don't forget organizations like Angel Flight (West, South Central, East, and North East) exist to assist ambulatory patients that can't otherwise afford air transportation for specialized, non-local, medial treatment. Of course, they help with other emergencies too, such as after Katrina.

      If you have a medical and financial need, Angel Flight may be able to help you side step financial and time problems created by road travel and the TSA during public air travel.

    4. Re:Ha, ha by Muad'Dave · · Score: 5, Informative

      For those that are curious, Y-90 has a half life of 64 hours and decays into (stable) Zr-90 via the emission of a 2.28 MeV beta- particle. It has a fairly high specific activity of 2.5x10^5 Ci/g (naturally, given its short half life). It is mainly produced from Sr-90, which is fairly dangerous if ingested because the body treats it like calcium - it ends up locked in your bones where it irradiates surround tissue - like bone marrow that produces blood cells. Here is a datasheet from a supplier - you can get it in activities of 1 Curie! That's 37 GBq.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  4. asking for a tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please, please, please, somebody tag this catscan.

  5. Poor thing... by Katatsumuri · · Score: 5, Funny

    I heard it hated to be observed.

  6. So let's say... by ForestGrump · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1. I'm remodeling my house. I go down to Home Despot/Slowes and buy a dozen smoke detectors. Would I get pulled over for being a suspected terrorist?

    2. I'm a cancer patient undergoing radiation therapy. What can be done to prevent the horror of being pulled over by the KGB? Would it be reasonable to issue "radiology patient" tags, like they issue handicapped tags for the handicapped?

    3. What is the false positive rate of such monitoring? Here, we have a cute example of a sick cat setting off a false positive. What about other incidents like this that fail to get into the newspaper?

    Grump

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    1. Re:So let's say... by David+Jao · · Score: 5, Insightful

      3. What is the false positive rate of such monitoring? Here, we have a cute example of a sick cat setting off a false positive. What about other incidents like this that fail to get into the newspaper? I'm not sure this matters. Are people's rights being trampled as a result of this monitoring? I'd feel more strongly about this story if there was mention of someone getting arrested, hassled, held, etc. On the other hand, if they detect cancer patients, they must pull people over pretty frequently, and the program may never catch a terrorist... well, good thing I'm not in politics.

      The false positive rate does matter, regardless of whether or not rights are being trampled. When you conduct any sort of large scale surveillance activity, the base rate fallacy implies that most of the triggering events will be false positives. With too many false positives, your surveillance program is worse than useless -- it wastes money that could otherwise be better used on other security initiatives.

      I know there is some emotional appeal in arguing that "if it saves even one life, etc. etc. then it's worth any amount of money" but in the real world that's just not true. In the real world, spending one billion dollars to save a life might be a bad idea if spending that same money on some other program would save two lives. In comparing the relative merits of two or more different security proposals, the false positive rate is one important factor to consider, because it affects the cost/benefit analysis.

      Of course, people's rights matter as well, because that also affects the cost/benefit analysis. Unfortunately, the American public is seemingly too dumb to perform any sort of analysis involving more than one variable. Since the false positive rate involves math, it doesn't have any political appeal at all. Hence the Republicans fixate only on the terrorists, and the Democrats when not fixating on the terrorists focus only on civil liberties to the exclusion of all else.

  7. Re:doesn't add up by masonc · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually I believe there have been lots of similar events. A friend of mine is a member of some service organization and was on a club outing to nearby Canada by coach. On the border crossing back to America, they were stopped at the crossing when the border guards told the driver to shut the coach down and they boarded it. The club members were apprehensive as they had been replenishing the club alcohol stash and had a bit more than the legal duty free limits in the storage areas.
    The guards finally identified one older gentleman and questioned him, only to find out he had been a radiation trace injection four weeks previously. They were cleared and went on their way.
    If they have this equipment at all the major crossings and on the interstates, imagine the cost and the amount of money that has been spent on these type of projects.

    --
    CM www.cometenergysystems.com Blog: http://caribbeanrenewable.blogspot.com/
  8. Re:cool. by jx100 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its purr could attract law enforcement officials.

  9. Re:Proper investigation by clarkkent09 · · Score: 5, Funny

    You never know with those feline terrorists.

    Perhaps it was a persian cat? You can never be too careful with those Al-Qaeda supporters

    --
    Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
  10. Re:Proper investigation by asliarun · · Score: 5, Funny

    I assume they promptly cut the cat open ...and it would have been quite safe as well. After all, the cat had 18 half-lives.
  11. Re:LOL @ Privacy Tag by clarkkent09 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    True, but since there are legitimate reasons for emitting radiation they should take that into account. The last thing people (or cats) undergoing radiation therapy for cancer need is to be stopped and searched on every corner

    --
    Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
  12. Re:It's all fun and games... by dlanod · · Score: 5, Funny
    I can see the interrogation now...


    FBI goon: "What's the matter??? CAT GOT YOUR TONGUE?"

  13. Let's say, then: by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1) Depends on the design of the detector. There's no chance the alpha particles from the Am-241 will be detected, as the cardboard box the smoke alarms are in will stop those, but the photons might be. The cat's scan residue (rimshot, please, along with everyone else in this discussion--but I would guess it's Tc-99 residue from a Tc-99m scan) was picked up by this detector system, so assumedly the Am-241 gammas might as well. That said, I don't know what activity is usually used smoke detectors (and I'm too lazy to look it up), or what activity is usually administered to cats during vet. nuclear med. procedures; questions like these are ones of quantity. You might well be stopped. From their perspective, you might well be buying twelve Am-241 sources to line the casing of a bomb.

    2) I was under the impression that oncologists were in the habit of doing just that--giving "doctor's notes" to patients with outpatient implanted brachytherapy seeds or devices. Being treated with a linear accelerator would not be likely to leave a perceptible amount of radiation in your body (photoneutrons from high energy linacs might cause some activation, but I don't think that it's generally a serious concern as far as setting off radiation alarms). Would it also bother you that you might well set off radiation alarms at nuclear power plants, if you happened to work at one, while being treated for your cancer?

    3) From a machine perspective, this was not a false positive. From a judicial/social standpoint, it was. I don't have much more to add beyond that.

  14. Re:cool. by RuBLed · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'M DA BOMB! LAWL!!

    KTHXBAI

  15. Re:It's all fun and games... by dbIII · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To make things worse a dirty bomb detector is a bit like having an Easter Bunny detector. It may create employment and the impression that something is being done to detect the kiddies but it's worth considering what phyicists think of the idea instead of various poorly educated coke-addled political advisors.

  16. Re:The thing that worries me is... by LaskoVortex · · Score: 5, Funny

    I do not want a hot cat sitting in my lap.

    Obviously a slashdotting geek to the very core. I'll take a hot pussy on my lap any day of the week.

    --
    Just callin' it like I see it.
  17. The man from the cat detector van. by Aussie · · Score: 5, Funny

    C: The man didn't have the right form.
    S: What man?
    C: The man from the cat detector van.
    S: The looney detector van, you mean.
    C: Look, it's people like you what cause unrest.
    S: What cat detector van?
    C: The cat detector van from the Ministry of Housinge.
    S: Housinge?
    C: It was spelt like that on the van (I'm very observant!). I never seen so
          many bleeding aerials. The man said that their equipment could pinpoint
          a purr at four hundred yards! And Eric, being such a happy cat, was a
          piece of cake.
    S: How much did you pay for this?
    C: Sixty quid, and eight for the fruit-bat.
    S: What fruit-bat?
    C: Eric the fruit-bat.
    S: Are all your pets called Eric?

  18. Re:cool. by Eponymous+Crowbar · · Score: 5, Funny

    We seem to be missing the real news here -- this has to be the first cat that can drive a car on the interstate, right?

  19. Excerpt from terrorist handbook by edwardpickman · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Feed cat Plutonium pellets with kibble. Wrap cat in detcord. Place timer on cat and set for five minutes. Release mouse on crowded street. Release cat after mouse. Run. Remember to face Mecca at 4:29 after you release cat." "Oh, don't forget to plug ears."

  20. Re:doesn't add up by tehdaemon · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is a story about Schrodinger's cat. This is exactly the kind of result you should expect.

    T

    --
    Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
  21. Insightful?? by adkeswani · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I check the comments expecting to see a series of Score:5 Funny.

    Instead, I find that most comments are Insightful and Informative.

    Come on people, a RADIOACTIVE CAT!

    Oh well, I guess this may be given an Insightful too...

  22. Re:Proper investigation by budgenator · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Vehicle goes by at 70 miles per hour," Giuliano told the crowd. "Agent is in the median, a good 80 feet away from the traffic. Signal went off and identified an isotope [in the passing car]."

    That is the impressive part, they didn't have to "cut" open the cat because they knew what they were looking for inside a car passing at 70MPH; all they needed to know is how much and in what form. A therapeutic amount in a cat is no problem isn't a problem, half a Kg for a car bomb is a problem. Another interesting point is while he didn't actually say it, it sounds like these things are quite portable and was contained in the vehicle.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  23. Re:In Soviet Russia... by yanyan · · Score: 5, Funny

    i can haz cat scan?