Slashdot Mirror


The Arthur C. Clarke Gamma Ray Burst

Larry Sessions, a columnist for Earth & Sky, has suggested in his blog that the gamma-ray event whose radiation reached us a few hours before Arthur C. Clarke died, and which occurred 7.5 billion years ago, be named the Clarke Event. The outburst, which produced enough visible light to render it a naked-eye object across half the universe, is officially designated GRB 080319B. What more fitting tribute to Clarke than to associate his name with the greatest bang since the big one? Sessions suggests writing to any astronomers, heads of physics departments, or planetarium operators you know and talking up the proposal.

40 of 120 comments (clear)

  1. No Europa Landings! by explosivejared · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just don't name any missions to Europa after him! That would probably upset him.

    --
    I got a catholic block.
    1. Re:No Europa Landings! by volcanopele · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, I think he would enjoy the irony if the landing site of the first Europa lander is named the "Arthur C. Clarke Station".

      --
      The Gish Bar Times - Blog covering Jupiter's moon Io
  2. If they find a new cluster of stars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they find a large cluster of stars in the near future, I'll recommend "The Dick Cheney Clusterfuck."

  3. Re:no, don't care for it by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How does that follow? Astronomical bodies get named after famous people or scientists frequently. No one is saying Clarke caused it (after all, it did happen over seven billion years ago), but it's a way of recognizing one of the most influential science/sci-fi writers who has ever lived.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  4. Minor correction... by diesel66 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What more fitting tribute to Clarke than to associate his name with the greatest bang since the big one? With all respect due Mr. Clarke and his burst, I would like to point out that Eccentrica Gallumbits is already well know as "the best bang since the big one".

    So long, Mr. Clarke, and thanks for all the fiction...
    --



    eleven plus two / twelve plus one
    1. Re:Minor correction... by Dik+Zak · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, no, no, no, no! Eccentrica Gallumbits described Zaphod Beeblebrox as "the best bang since the big one." It says so right in your link.

    2. Re:Minor correction... by jmagar.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only a comment as well crafted as that one could draw a lurker like me. Well done!

  5. Re:no, don't care for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Clarke Event makes it sound like he was involved in it some way. Show that his death triggered the burst and I will be most impressed.

    "Look," whispered a Slashdotter, and Jollyreaper lifted his eyes to heaven. (There is always a last time for everything.)

    Overhead, in glorious blazes of gamma radiation, the stars were going out.

  6. Re:In numbers I can understand, please by Zymergy · · Score: 2, Funny

    What about Light-Ballmerchairs?

  7. Best bang since the big one by geekgirlandrea · · Score: 3, Funny

    What more fitting tribute to Clarke than to associate his name with the greatest bang since the big one?

    But Zaphod Beeblebrox already has a name. :)

  8. Re:In numbers I can understand, please by andy314159pi · · Score: 2, Funny

    What about Light-Ballmerchairs?
    First you'd have to find some experimentalists that were courageous enough to want to measure the the speed of a Ballmer thrown chair.
  9. Re:no, don't care for it by hansamurai · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ever since I was a kid I wondered who this Haley was that first threw a comet out of our atmosphere.

  10. Re:it won't take much convincing by Gat0r30y · · Score: 2, Funny

    the eliot spitzer event That one's already taken, don't worry though, she got a towel to clean that mess out of her hair.

    On a serious note, I do hope we can name it after Clarke, he has inspired many (including myself). And this seems as fitting a tribute as any.
    --
    Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
  11. Re:Major correction... by diesel66 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh no! I'm stupid!

    It was Ms. Gallumbits describing Zaphod Beeblebrox

    How embarrassing!

    --



    eleven plus two / twelve plus one
  12. Re:In numbers I can understand, please by snl2587 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's simple! Get a hand-held radar gun, find Steve Ballmer in a public place and ensure there's an easily-throwable chair nearby. Then point to someone and tell Steve that the guy said the iPod was inferior to the Zune. Viola! All that suffers is your conscience.

  13. Old news... by Chapter80 · · Score: 3, Funny

    We're just seeing this news on Slashdot now? This hit digg 7.49 Billion years ago.

  14. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Repeating the libelous (and since retracted) fiction of British tabloids to insult a dead man is pretty low.

    Do you also believe in Bat Boy?

  15. Overdoing it by isomeme · · Score: 4, Informative

    What, having the single most valuable orbit type named after him isn't enough? The orbit has the further advantage of actually being his idea.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    1. Re:Overdoing it by Jonathunder · · Score: 5, Informative

      It wasn't his idea, though he did popularize it in a 1945 story. Herman Potocnik published a paper on geosynchronous satellites for communication in 1928.

    2. Re:Overdoing it by isomeme · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It wasn't a story; it was a technical article, I believe for the magazine Wireless World.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    3. Re:Overdoing it by setagllib · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's Prof. Geostationary to you, you insensitive clod.

      --
      Sam ty sig.
  16. The Objective is to Remember by moore.dustin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With all due respect, should we not remember him by naming something after him that itself will be remembered? I mean really, this Gamma Ray Burst is not going to be a topic for many people in even a couple weeks, let alone several years from now. We remember Kennedy via the Kennedy Space Center, Hawking gets Hawking Radiation, Einstein/Galileo has some satellites and the examples are really endless here. Why not name something after him which will carry his namesake more actively throughout the future. Of course this is not the only thing that will bear his name, but out of all the possibilities people want to spend their effort on this one? I'd like to see that enthusiasm directed towards something better than getting a GRB event named after him. Cool? Maybe. Lasting? No.

    1. Re:The Objective is to Remember by reverseengineer · · Score: 3, Informative

      In terms of more lasting recognition for Arthur C. Clarke, he already has asteroid 4923 Clarke, a dinosaur, Serendipaceratops arthurcclarkei, Clarke orbits (an IAU recognized term for geostationary orbit), , a bunch of space stuff has already been named for his Odyssey works, and if we ever build a space elevator, it's likely his name will be connected in some way with that. The man has already been much honored, and deservedly so.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    2. Re:The Objective is to Remember by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If this GRB is as rare as it appears to be, it will likely serve as a reference magnitude for other GRBs observed in the future (i.e., today's burst was the largest ever - 1.3x the magnitude of the Clarke Event observed in 2008, etc.)

      As an aside, I'm surprised no comments (that I've read) follow this line of logic:

      Of course Clarke's death didn't cause the burst, but wouldn't it be remarkable if somehow, even if by seeming coincidence, the burst caused his death?

    3. Re:The Objective is to Remember by doubletruncation · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree that it's not clear that this GRB will be that significant of an outlier after a decade or so of observations. Three of the four intrinsically brightest events ever observed occurred in the last 3 years and were discovered by Swift (050904, 061007 and 080319B which is this one). This one is also not an order of magnitude brighter (intrinsically) than any other GRB - more like a factor of 2 (the next brightest was 050904 which in turn was a factor of ~2 brighter than the third most luminous GRB, see figure 4 in http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.3215 ). Certainly it's a really cool event, neat to think that you could have seen something 7 billion light years away with the naked eye, but I'd be surprised if we don't see even more luminous ones in the next few decades.

  17. Re:Not only that... by Somegeek · · Score: 3, Informative

    Can you back up the pedophile claim? Thought not. As far as I can tell not one shred of evidence for the claim has ever been found. He was still knighted, after a two year delay caused by these claims. That shows pretty clearly that the claims were investigated and found to be false.

    --
    And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
  18. No need to mod anything in this thread up. by Somegeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    The facts have come out. Years ago. He never did anything. No one ever came forward. No evidence was ever found. This is old news.

    --
    And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    1. Re:No need to mod anything in this thread up. by xtracto · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, for all the people that still think it might be true, the fact is that all the Sir Arthur C. Clarke paeophilia issue was brought forward by no less than The Sunday Mirror (or dailiy mirror) which is just a tabloid "news" paper in the UK. They even printed an apology and retraction.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  19. The Star by Guy+Harris · · Score: 3, Funny

    An explosive event in space named after Clarke? Oh, great....

  20. Re:no, don't care for it by q-the-impaler · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...the gamma-ray event whose radiation reached us a few hours before Arthur C. Clarke died... I suspect it was Carl Sagan who fired that gamma-ray, knowing all to well Mr. Clarke was not wearing his tinfoil hat.
    --
    Sierra Tango Foxtrot Uniform
  21. An alternative proposal by hcdejong · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How about making sure Clarke Orbit becomes the common name for the geostationary orbit?

  22. Re:GRB naming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gamma-ray bursts are given catalogue names based on the date they were discovered. There is no mechanism for naming bursts beyond that. Occasionally a burst is given an informal name. For example, one burst is sometimes called the Superbowl burst because it went off during the Superbowl (which is the name of an annual championship US football game). However, there is nothing official about these names, and the IAU does not recognize them. I like the idea of informally naming GRB 080319B after Sir Arthur C. Clarke. In fact, it is already being referred to that way by some people in the gamma-ray burst community. We will see if it catches on.

  23. Re:Major correction... by db32 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please proceed to the counter to have your geek card revoked for the combined failure in incorrectly citing a classic AND incorrectly using a hyperlink and inadvertently pointing out your own first failure.

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  24. Why God? by STrinity · · Score: 3, Funny

    There were so many stars you could have used. What was the need to give those people to the fire, so the symbol of their passing might shine above Sri Lanka?

    --
    Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    1. Re:Why God? by STrinity · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whoever modded me a troll should immediately lose all geek cred. My post was word-for-word from a Clarke story, except I changed Bethleham to Sri Lanka.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
  25. So, what do you have against stars? by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seriously, what if there's a inhabited planet around one of those stars and they find out what we think of them some day? We might be the ones who end up getting the shock-and-awe treatment, with a Mother Of All Nova Bombs.

    The only collection of objects that might deserve the name Cheney might be a scattering of parasite-ridden coyote droppings. Although given that scavenger dung may have better poll ratings . . .

  26. Re:no, don't care for it by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Look," whispered a Slashdotter, and Jollyreaper lifted his eyes to heaven. (There is always a last time for everything.)

    Overhead, in glorious blazes of gamma radiation, the stars were going out. "No, you dolt," said Jollyreaper. "It is a passing cloud." (The simplest explanation is usually the best.)

    "Ah, so it is," replied the Anonymous Coward, and crawled back into his cave.
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  27. Re:It's an alien conspiracy by SleptThroughClass · · Score: 2, Funny

    You killed Arthur! You bastards!

  28. Eccentrica Gallumbits by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...was the biggest bang since the big one so this burst should be named after her.

    OTH if a seven billion year old gamma ray burst could be used to debunk Christian mythology I think then maybe there is a case for naming it after Clarke.

  29. It already exists, and visible with the naked eye. by Dopamine,+Redacted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Make sure you use a telescope with a clock drive and a filter. Declination: Undisclosed Right Ascension: Undisclosed