Slashdot Mirror


World's Fastest Net Link 'Used To Dry Laundry'

praps writes "Last summer a 75-year-old woman from central Sweden became the envy of the IT world with her scorching 40Gbps internet connection. 1,500 simultaneous HDTV channels or a whole high definition DVD downloaded in two seconds were hers for the taking. Now Sigbritt Löthberg could soon be treated to an incredible 100 Gbps link — but it may not be put to great use. According to the head of the ultra-fast fiber connection project, Sigbritt mostly used the gear 'to dry her laundry.'"

135 comments

  1. First Post ? by daveime · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Am I the only one for whom this page's style sheet has comitted suicide ?

    1. Re:First Post ? by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are all like that on idle for some reason -- at least for me in FF

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:First Post ? by NinjaPablo · · Score: 1

      No, it looks weird for me too. Earlier the front page wasn't loading any CSS at all.

      --
      SmashTech - No smashing of tech involved
    3. Re:First Post ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Same here in IE6 (shut up, I'm at work.)

    4. Re:First Post ? by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

      I kinda like it. Other than it makes the comment box tiny

      seriously.
      This tiny sentence fills it.

    5. Re:First Post ? by Wavebreak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's the idle layout. And yes, it's horrible.

      --
      Nobody expects the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal.
    6. Re:First Post ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like the fire-hose stories do, and the subdomain (idle) is the same as fire-hose stories, so I assume that CmdrTaco accidentally posted the fire-hose story to the front page instead of reposting it like normal.

      The other stories on the front page of the site look like normal.

    7. Re:First Post ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4pr11 Ph001z

    8. Re:First Post ? by kc2keo · · Score: 1

      Ugh, I hate the idle layout too. I'm viewing it at 1280x1024 in FF.

    9. Re:First Post ? by daveime · · Score: 1

      There's still something severely broken with this topic ...

      I have my settings on -1 (I like seeing the Slashdot moderation system in action) ... and apparently there's 42 comments.

      Why can I only see 8 of them ?

      Is there a "-2 broken" setting ? Why wasn't I told ???

    10. Re:First Post ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sucks ass in Safari (5525.13) as well.

    11. Re:First Post ? by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

      Checked in Konqueror; you are indeed correct, dear sir. I'm not sure whether I'd start to hate this style, I do find it somewhat interesting for the moment, but the squished comment box has to be dealt with.

      --
      I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
    12. Re:First Post ? by fosterNutrition · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think you meant to say "the whole idle section is horrible." Seriously, I try to avoid this corner of the site as much as possible, but I mistakenly thought that since this article concerned genuine technology advances it might be real news. Please, for the love of God, get rid of idle. If I want juvenile bullshit, I'll go read Fark or just look at lolcats or something. I hate it I hate it I hate it.

    13. Re:First Post ? by eht · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      In addition, Idle still has not shown up in the configuration options for me to minimize.

    14. Re:First Post ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they're taking a digg at some over site.

    15. Re:First Post ? by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      No. It's fucking awful. On a 1024 high screen in FF, you can't even see the first comment. That's just insane. I daren't even try on my eee or 770 with their 480 pixel high screens (which usually manage an ad-free Slashdot just fine).

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    16. Re:First Post ? by harry666t · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's worse than failure. It's ugly. It's BAD. It's shitty. I hope it burns in the eleventh circle of hell (the one for bad webpage designs) very soon. I hope that "soon" will be in next ten seconds. DAMMIT.

    17. Re:First Post ? by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can think of at least 4 stories that made the front page in the last week or so that should have been set here instead of the category they where in.

      I really didn't even know this part of the site existed, or at least I didn't know it existed in this state. It is horrible.

      Who is the retarded monkey responsible for this crap? Surely this has to be a mistake. It looks like the bastard child of the anything that wants to die and anyone stupid enough to join it. It this concept of "no news" being news and page layout that can't even render the same in different browsers (FF, IE6, and old mozilla)continues, I think a lot of people will simply not come around. I would probably be one of them but I suspect that doesn't matter much.

    18. Re:First Post ? by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Februrary has 29 days in 2008.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    19. Re:First Post ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez Taco, you cocksucker!! For a change I didn't even have to start this fucking rant. See?? I'M NOT THE ONLY ONE WHO CAN'T STAND THIS NEW FORMAT!! Stop playing Hide the Salami with your boyfriend and get on the ball.

    20. Re:First Post ? by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      It must be an april fools joke.... Another one... I appreciate the effort but I don't like this kind of humor.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    21. Re:First Post ? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      This is actually worse than failure. Anyway, this is my first time posting a comment on idle. If you think the comments page is messed up, you should check out the page for posting comments.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    22. Re:First Post ? by MyOtherUIDis3digits · · Score: 1

      Do they also block http://www.mozilla.com/ ?

      --
      Ignore anything I said above, I actually agree with everything you believe - mod accordingly.
    23. Re:First Post ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or www.portableapps.com?

    24. Re:First Post ? by 45mm · · Score: 1

      Not going to comment on the quality ... but it is "working" for me in FF 2.0.0.12

    25. Re:First Post ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and yet...you are here. Really living up to your nickname, eh?

    26. Re:First Post ? by Warg!+The+Orcs!! · · Score: 1

      There's a circle for Bad Web Design?

      **gets worried**

      --
      Travelling forward in time at a rate of 1 second per second.
    27. Re:First Post ? by Nullav · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately not. It was like this when I first saw it a few months ago. Also, this comment box is absolutely horrible. :(

      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
    28. Re:First Post ? by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      They probably don't, but corporate IT might block your continued employment if you install unapproved software.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    29. Re:First Post ? by harry666t · · Score: 1

      Yeah. As of 1997 Microsoft had bought almost 90% of the Hell, and released a new circle with each major Windows upgrade or service pack. Hopefully some hackers are fighting to restore Hell's proper function, although they might have screwed with which circle was there for what. Eleventh circle is already almost ours, thanks to Firefox team (didn't you know where the "fire" from "firefox" came from?).

    30. Re:First Post ? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I really didn't even know this part of the site existed, or at least I didn't know it existed in this state. It is horrible.

      Well, you were warned. At the top where it says "you have 42 unread messages and 0 read messages" and "Did you know that subscribers can see into the future?" and "Have you metamoderated lately?" it often says "idle.slashdot.org is a total waste of your time. Never go there."

      Me? I'd never g... oh wait

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    31. Re:First Post ? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      You know what, Not that you mention it, I remember that. I just figured it was a joke I didn't get about people spending too much time on ./ while at work or something. I guess I should have known.

  2. Euphemism by Enderandrew · · Score: 5, Funny

    If "drying her laundry" is a euphemism for the mass quantities of porn she is downloading, then I'd be doing the same thing.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Euphemism by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Porn? Pfft! I'd be downloading massive amounts of ware^WLinux ISOs with that connection. As an aside, how the hell do you get 40Gbps to your workstation? Isn't 39 of that kinda overkill? ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Euphemism by afxgrin · · Score: 1

      If anyone read the article, her son was responsible for the project that put that fiber through her property. It's just a cheesy way of getting your attention to advertise the world's fastest net link in a news article.

    3. Re:Euphemism by Van+Cutter+Romney · · Score: 1

      No, that would be drying her "dirty" laundry.

      --
      Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again.
    4. Re:Euphemism by compro01 · · Score: 2

      well, you can get one of these, but that'll still put 30 of those to waste unless they're got something else cobbled together, as 40GBe and 100GBe are still WIP.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  3. bandwidth by 68030 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is this really that big of a surprise? I seem to recall from the original story that prior to this she had never even owned a computer.

    I've never owned a space station, but I imagine if I suddenly came into control of one, I wouldn't get it put to as much use as someone with a clue.

  4. Mmm Dry Laundry by dmacleod808 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Id like to come over and dry my laundry at her house!

    --
    There Can Be Only One...
    1. Re:Mmm Dry Laundry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this news to slashdot commenters? People have been airing their dirty laundry on this site for years!

  5. Good move by niceone · · Score: 4, Funny

    It does work - I used to use my high-end HP workstation to dry my biking clothes when it rained. I did feel a bit sorry for the people in the neigbouring cubes though.

    1. Re:Good move by fuego451 · · Score: 1

      I used my Laserjet II to warm the house in Winter but I could never figure out how to attach a thermostat to the darn thing.

  6. I heard something... by SnoopJeDi · · Score: 1, Funny

    As if thousands of voices cried out in agony....and were suddenly silenced.

    1. Re:I heard something... by Sethus · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, mod parent funny. He's making a joke about how we're all crying in agony on that bandwith probably being wasted. And combining it with a Star Wars reference.

      --
      Posting with out proof reading since 2001.
  7. Hey! by Kranfer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey I wanna dry my laundry too you know. I'll test this stuff out... I'd love to be able to download a full HD DVD of Porn in 2 seconds. Dammit.

    --
    -- Josh
    "Whoopie! Man, that may have been a small one for Neil, but that's a long one for me!" - Pete Conrad
    1. Re:Hey! by kalirion · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Becomes kind of pointless when the internet speed is a few times faster than your hard drive can handle.

    2. Re:Hey! by Upphew · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Who cares about hard drives, when you can outsource them?

    3. Re:Hey! by Qzukk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Becomes kind of pointless when the internet speed is a few times faster than your hard drive can handle.

      Yeah, but with a connection like that, Comcast would only have to compress HD channels to half their normal quality in order to get them all to fit in the tube!

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    4. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll outsource my hard di*k if you know what I mean.

    5. Re:Hey! by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Raid, Flash raid, ramdrives... ISPS suck, don't try and pretend they aren't the bottleneck.

    6. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Becomes kind of pointless when the internet speed is a few times faster than your hard drive can handle.
      It's the speed my brain can cope with I'm worried about!
  8. In Sweeden ... by utnapistim · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... only old people have 40Gbps internet connection.

    --
    Tie two birds together: although they have four wings, they cannot fly. (The blind man)
  9. Brain the size of a planet... by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny

    Brain the size of a planet, access to 1,500 high definition HDTV channels simultaneously, and she wants me to dry her laundry!

    .... depressing

    1. Re:Brain the size of a planet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, how many Library of Congress is that?

    2. Re:Brain the size of a planet... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well that's life.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  10. Damn...All I need now... by geekmux · · Score: 2, Funny

    ....is my Blue Gene L washing machine and I'll be ready set the record for the largest waste of computing resources in history.

  11. In my early programming days by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    I had to walk/bus into work. I wore some old trainers then changed when I arrived.

    I had an "official warning" for drying out damp trainers on the server!

  12. Oh Noes Broadband by ChadAmberg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every time I hear everyone whining about "broadband adoption rates" I just think that they don't get it.
    Lots of people don't want broadband.
    Lots of people don't even care about Internet access.
    Sure it would be nice to have availability everywhere, but when the measurement is of how many people use broadband, that doesn't say much of anything.

    1. Re:Oh Noes Broadband by zappepcs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, the LOTS of people that you are talking about had ancestors that didn't care about cars, or even want cars. Times change. 40GB/s is a good rate for downloading while watching HDTV etc.Some people never saw the usefulness of a computer in the home either.. they too were wrong.

  13. asdf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and this is why we can't have nice things.....

  14. I had a great idea for exercise equipment by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I once had the great idea to sell home exercise equipment that was very difficult to use as exercise equipment but had several long poles jutting out of it each long enough to hold a bath towel. I figured that since all my other home exercise equipment ended up being laundry racks anyway, that it would make sense to design some just for that purpose.

    Never really got off the ground with it, though.

    1. Re:I had a great idea for exercise equipment by Kyont · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slightly off-topic, but this would mesh really well with the idea I had - to sell home exercise equipment with the odometer pre-set to thousands of miles (or reps) and prominently displayed. That way, when people come over and see your stationary bike hung with towels, you can point to the odometer as proof that you've circled the earth several times on it already and the towels are clearly just temporary.

      The side effect of this product, though, would be "odometer inflation" in which our competitors would sell equipment showing an ever-higher odometer reading.

      --
      You shall see a cow on the roof of a cotton house.
  15. theonion.com predicting the future again... by rekoil · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bantu Tribesman Uses IBM Modem To Crush Nut
    (linked to alternate site 'cuz I can't find it on theonion.com...)

    1. Re:theonion.com predicting the future again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone had shown him how to unpack the modem properly it would have never happened. At least he already had kids.

  16. Shame about the pathetic harddrive speeds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on driver makers, get with the program(me). Let's get some serious speed improvements, eh?

  17. Drying clothes with porn! by AioKits · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you're drying your undies and such, do you need to download porn to make them dry quicker? If so, this would be the first time I've heard of porn making clothes dry...

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    1. Re:Drying clothes with porn! by nacturation · · Score: 1

      ... this would be the first time I've heard of porn making clothes dry... This is typically the lead-in required for someone to claim: "I take it you haven't met my ex!"
      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  18. The terminal is probably good as a dryer too by Zarhan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was introduced to the guy whose mother this lady is at IETF in Chicago. Working for a networking hardware vendor kinda gives perks.

    Anyway, even if the bandwidth is free I wouldn't call it cheap - the CPE device takes (I think) 3kW of power. So yeah, you can dry clothes on it quite easily..

    1. Re:The terminal is probably good as a dryer too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was introduced to the guy whose mother this lady is at IETF in Chicago.

      OK, Yoda.

    2. Re:The terminal is probably good as a dryer too by patchvonbraun · · Score: 1

      Peter Lothberg has always had whatever counted as "scorching" bandwidth for a very long time.

      He's really good at working "deals" to keep up with current trends in network firehoses...

    3. Re:The terminal is probably good as a dryer too by sshore · · Score: 1

      3kW? Like, two hair dryer's worth?

      That's hot.

    4. Re:The terminal is probably good as a dryer too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zarhan actually had another one, called "I was there":

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=488070&cid=22754030

      At least it was (Score:5, Informative) ;)

      Go Zarhan, go!

  19. Drying Clothes by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    On a few occasions, I have used a server cabinet with about 8 machines in it to dry my trousers (which got wet on the way in to work). Hey, you might as well do something useful with all that hot air!

    In a previous job, we used to have to test gas boilers by plumbing the boiler to a test rig with an expansion vessel and a plate-to-plate heat exchanger -- the secondary side of which was fed from the water main via a flow rate meter (I still remember the formula: 1 degree temp rise * 1 lpm flow rate = 70 watts) and dumped down a grid. Which is very wasteful, but the trouble with hot water is it doesn't stay hot for long. Don't know if anyone has found a good use for it since then, or if anyone even remembers how to use that test rig.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    1. Re:Drying Clothes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone walked in and saw the server administrator trouserless, they must think "He must be a Slashdot regular!"

  20. got warm... by sdumi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "It was a big bit of gear and it got pretty warm."

    doing what... nothing?

    1. Re:got warm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always wondered...
      say i have a 2KW fan heater, and a server drawing 2KW of power. Do they produce identical amounts of heat in a room?

    2. Re:got warm... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Yes, although it helps to have a bigger fan by the server to spread the heat around.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:got warm... by neumayr · · Score: 1

      I don't think so.
      The fan heater's sole purpose is heating, so it will try to convert as much electrical energy into concentrated heat as possible.
      In the case of the server, that energy is needed to drive electrons through circuits and stuff, which do get hot, but as they're scattered over a lot of space that heat isn't as concentrated as in the heater. By the time the hot air reaches the fan, it will already have cooled down a little.
      Also, I'm pretty sure some of that electrical energy is converted to something else than heat.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
  21. Not the first time. by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 2, Funny

    A friend of mine discovered that the washing line in the garden of his rented house was actually a very long Cat-5E cable. Sadly, he didn't find this out till it snapped, which was particularly annoying for him as he had just spend £30 on a massive bit of cable to reach all the way to his computer in the attic room of the house.

  22. when can the rest have this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about fibre to the home for the rest of us?

    10 years, 20 years?

    1. Re:when can the rest have this? by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      That's nothing compared to the 75 she had to wait for hers!

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  23. Slasperv by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its strange that the link for what looks to be a highly informative photo documentary exploring the life and characters of Swedish nightclubs seems to be broken.

    I wouldn't have thought Swedish nightclubs held all that many attractions for basement dwelling ./ folk, especially since not many actually live in Sweden.

  24. Today's Kilgorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    On the internet,
    no one can hear you cream.

    PatRIOTically,
    K. Trout

  25. Classic! by Morosoph · · Score: 1

    "We're considering giving her a 100 gigabits per second connection in the summer," said Hafsteinn Jonsson.

    "Then she'll be able to dry all her neighbours' laundry too."

  26. Plot for Simpson's ep? by El_Smack · · Score: 1

    Frink gets called in to help fix the internet connection of a Swedish girls dorm.
    Frink: Well here 's your trouble, you've got panties and bras all over your Web-o-Max 40Gb/s equipment, glaavin"

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
  27. of course shes not using it by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    can you imagine what would happen to the overall internet speed if any of us had a 40gb connection? talk about slashdot effect...

    --
    stuff |
  28. Also by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    It has a couple other problems:

    1) Can she even get that kind of speed? I mean yes, she's got a big ass link. Ok, that's great. Does her ISP have the necessary upstream to support that? It is much easier to have a single connection running at a given speed than it is to have connections at that speed supported by the necessary upstream to the Internet to make them useful.

    2) Even if she does, that is way past the point of it mattering. There just isn't enough things out there that need that kind of bandwidth. You discover that at this point, even 10mbit is really damn fast for normal usage like web surfing (including video) e-mail and so on. It is only if you download large things that it becomes much of an issue. 100mbit is really fast for anything. At work I've downloaded a Linux DVD in like 7 minutes. Really, that is to the point where extra speed wouldn't make a ton of difference. In this case, we are talking speed in excess of what a harddrive can handle.

    3) There just isn't much, if anything, on the net that is going to have the kind of upstream to make any real use of that. Even if you are doing a ton of things at one, you'll be hard pressed to find enough fat pipes to start to fill up a link that large. There are backbones that aren't that fast.

    This whole thing was nothing but a publicity stunt, and this just proves it. Despite his claim that this showed how fast connections can be put in the home for cheap, it does nothing of the sort. It shows how it really isn't that useful at this point, and how the gear is so high end it produces enough heat to use as a dryer.

    As Slashdot is fond of saying: Nothing to see here, move along.

    1. Re:Also by davidkv · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This isn't to prove how fast connections can be put in the home cheaply. It's to prove how you can build really fast connections (think backbones and such) way cheaper than before.
      That makes it really useful, actually.

    2. Re:Also by Captain+Spam · · Score: 4, Interesting

      At work I've downloaded a Linux DVD in like 7 minutes. Really, that is to the point where extra speed wouldn't make a ton of difference.


      Obligatory Homer Simpson quote (modified): "7 minutes? But I want it now!"

      Though out of all seriousness, I think there'd be a Field of Dreams situation if everyone had a pipe like that. If we all had that speed, someone would make content to fill it. Might not just be an internet data line. Might be digital TV data, phone data, etc, etc. In fact, that's what the summary states, she has the capability for (not necessarily the need for nor is actually using) tons of HD channels with a line that fast.

      You can do more with a connection like that than just internet stuff, is what I'm saying.
      --
      Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
    3. Re:Also by gooman · · Score: 4, Funny

      If we all had that speed, someone would make content to fill it.

      Microsoft. The next version of Windows will be measured in TB.

      --
      "Kittens give Morbo gas!"
    4. Re:Also by Megane · · Score: 1

      4) Is her computer even capable of producing/using a sustained 40Gbits of data? Plain old 66MHz/32-bit PCI can handle a couple of gigabits, but not 40. And even if her computer could handle it, the computer on the other end would have to be able to give that much speed as well. Once you get past a gigabit or so, the actual performance isn't likely to increase for a single computer on the end of the link. These kinds of speeds are (currently) only good for connecting networks, not computers.

      (And crap, the comment box for idle.slashdot.org IS small... but at least it doesn't redirect you back when you change to slashdot.org in the address bar, and you can get the regular comment box.)

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    5. Re:Also by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      More like TB p/s

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    6. Re:Also by kesuki · · Score: 1

      I'm not 100% sure but since her son set it up, they could well be saturating the network with filler packets, generated by one of the computers at either end of the 1,242.75 mile link. she has the hardware needed to satisfy a 40 gigabit link, and it's working without repeaters. but the thing is, this 'feat' is no better than OC-768 lines, which also can run 2000 KM between repeaters. the next theing he's going to do is give her a 100 gigabit/sec link Which is a big deal, it's better than the suggested(non existent today) Oc-1536 by 20 gigabits
      in other words she'll have an OC-1920 line
      now That kind of technology will be great, I honestly think that he should have proven that you could get 2000 KM for a much much slower optical link, using cheap (not telco grade) equipment...

    7. Re:Also by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2, Interesting

      . At work I've downloaded a Linux DVD in like 7 minutes. Really, that is to the point where extra speed wouldn't make a ton of difference. In this case, we are talking speed in excess of what a harddrive can handle.

      But when you can download the whole distro in seven seconds, then you can start seeing a return to dumb terminals in public places, as everyone can boot off their own hard drive over the internet.

      This preview window is horribly laid out, and I cannot continue my point.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    8. Re:Also by element-o.p. · · Score: 2, Informative

      You probably can't d/l from a single source at 40G/s, but you could pull pieces from multiple sources at a combined total of 40G/s (isn't that essentially what torrent does?) or you can d/l multiple items from multiple sources so that, while you aren't getting any one download any faster, you could get a days' worth of downloads in the time it usually takes to download one file.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    9. Re:Also by MyOtherUIDis3digits · · Score: 1

      More like TB p/s

      ...of incoming exploits.

      --
      Ignore anything I said above, I actually agree with everything you believe - mod accordingly.
    10. Re:Also by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      You would need four 10Gbps ethernet cards, which is going to set you back about 6000USD, then a suitable switch, probably double that.

    11. Re:Also by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      There just isn't enough things out there that need that kind of bandwidth. You discover that at this point, even 10mbit is really damn fast for normal usage like web surfing (including video) e-mail and so on. It is only if you download large things that it becomes much of an issue.


      Sure 10 Mb is damn fast for normal usage, but what if you have more than one machine, add another computer, a net enabled video game machine, portable devices. It adds up, especially if your upload is slower than your download.
    12. Re:Also by Silver+Gryphon · · Score: 1

      Tuberculosis?

    13. Re:Also by brenda5 · · Score: 1

      >Even if she does, that is way past the point of it mattering. There just isn't enough things out there that need that kind of bandwidth.


      We only need 640K of memory on a PC, more than that is just a waste!

  29. April Fool? by djsmeg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Isn't this story a day early for April Fool's Day?

  30. Remove the 'idle' by Eevee · · Score: 2, Informative

    Using plain old //slashdot.org/ for the article got rid of the problem for me.

  31. Shhhh! by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    She thinks I love her for her good looks.

  32. That's nothin' by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

    I had a Netgear wireless router I used to cook eggs on

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  33. That's kind of the point though by gelfling · · Score: 1

    What good is internet technology unless it's fundamentally pointless overkill? We just call this the OCDPOM program (one clothes dryer old woman)

  34. April Fool's Day came in March this year by 14erCleaner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think this story arrived a day early.

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
    1. Re:April Fool's Day came in March this year by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Posted by CmdrTaco on 01:40 AM -- Tuesday April 01 2008

      Not for me.

    2. Re:April Fool's Day came in March this year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you knew Sigbritt's son Peter, you would realize that this is absolutely true. Peter had Cisco's prototype Packet Over Sonet cards back in the day with a trans-atlantic link between a Sprint POP in New Jersey and his bathroom in Sweden. True story.

    3. Re:April Fool's Day came in March this year by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      Posted by CmdrTaco on 01:40 AM -- Tuesday April 01 2008

      Not for me.


      You insomniac Siberians must be having a good laugh about this one.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    4. Re:April Fool's Day came in March this year by evilviper · · Score: 1

      April Fool's Day came in March this year [...] I think this story arrived a day early.

      No, this is just typical idle...

      Slogan: "It's not a steaming pile of crap, it's idle.slashdot.org"!

      Now how the hell do I block these damn idle stories from appearing on the front page?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:April Fool's Day came in March this year by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Siberians?

      Sorry, try again :)

    6. Re:April Fool's Day came in March this year by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      Maybe a New Zealander who does phone support to the US?
      Anyway, it's April 1st over most of the world by now...

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    7. Re:April Fool's Day came in March this year by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Yes! Except for the phone support. I'm just a night person.

  35. Gross by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

    Dude, didn't you RTFS? She's 75!

    --
    I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    1. Re:Gross by unitron · · Score: 1

      The only measurement of hers in which he is interested is bandwidth.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  36. I Call BS by trongey · · Score: 1

    Sweden is the 8th richest country in the world. Why would anybody there be doing her own laundry

    --
    You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
  37. hah, that's nothing. by newr00tic · · Score: 1

    My internet connection, however, is used for ' watching paint dry.. '

    --
    A horse can't be sick, you know, even if he wants to.
  38. Yes but that's some laundry you know by thewils · · Score: 1

    If you read TFA you'll see what I mean from the photo on the right.

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  39. And she's surfing this on what exactly? by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Having a 40Gbps connection is just dandy, but here's a question that's going completely unanswered:

    She's surfing this on what kind of PC?

    Last time I checked, your typical PC doesn't come with a 40Gbps NIC in it. It's usually GigE, with 10/100 for the cheap ones. Nevermind that most folks can't afford GigE switches to plug into in the first place, which means most folks are using 10/100 anyway.

    40Gbps NIC's can't exactly be cheap since they're only found in the high-end server space. In fact, I couldn't find pricing on a separate 40Gbps NIC in a quick and casual Google search. The only 40Gbps stuff I've run into is either on the switch itself or came with the server. I have a funny feeling that, if you can actually buy one of these things separately, it would cost several times more than any PC this lady is likely to own.

    Next, even if you get one of these NIC's, what exactly are you going to plug it into? The craziest PCI-X slot available (2.0, 533MHz) tops out at 4.3GByte/sec, which is 34.4Gbit/sec -- too slow! PCI-E 2.0 32x (not that you'll find this kind of connector on anything common, if you can find it at all) maxes out at 16GByte/sec, which is 128Gbit/sec -- fast enough, but again I don't think anyone makes anything with this kind of a connector yet. Your more-common PCI-E 1.1e 16x connector tops out at 4GByte/sec, or 32GBit/sec -- too slow for 40Gbps feeds.

    And then there's the issue of actually saving this wonderful content she's so busily downloading. Saving a full-length DVD-9 (9GB) in two seconds would require a bandwidth of 4.5GByte/sec. Most hard drives today have a max sustained write speed of 20-30MByte/sec. Some SAN's have a hard time with the bandwidth being tossed around here. Does grandma have an EMC array in the basement next to this magical fiber link?

    Lastly, exactly who is grandma doing to download stuff from that can actually provide her 40Gbps of bandwidth? Most small companies have DS-1's. Medium-sized folks have multiple DS-1's, fractional DS-3's, or full DS-3's. Your larger organizations have OC-3's and OC-12's, but it starts to get really, really rarefied if you go up above that. Suffice to say, unless grandma is getting stuff from the likes of Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft, or Akamai, she's not going to be able to actually keep that 40Gbps pipe busy.

    Now, a good bit of the above takes a sarcastic tone, but there's a lesson in it: you're only as fast as the slowest part of the chain. There's a helluva lot of work that needs to be done on the entire information interchange infrastructure -- from the server to the PC and everything in between -- before stuff like this even begins to make sense for the average Joe. Data centers? Sure. Home 40Gbps? Not so useful.

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    1. Re:And she's surfing this on what exactly? by Artuir · · Score: 1

      You have to start somewhere, right?

    2. Re:And she's surfing this on what exactly? by cjdkoh · · Score: 1

      combine that with the fact (read: high probability) that she doesn't even have a PC...

    3. Re:And she's surfing this on what exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1Gb/s Ethernet cards are quite cheap nowadays, and are found in pairs on mainboards from US$50 and up I'd guess. Switches with 5-8 ports are available from US$30 or so. 10Gb/s ethernet is apparently still quite exotic and hard to find. I have no Idea what kind of hardware would be available with bandwidth significantly above 10Gb/s, but it should be possible to bond 4 10Gb ethernet cards.

    4. Re:And she's surfing this on what exactly? by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1

      GigE switches are no more expensive here than a 100MB switch. (Consumer equipment wise),obviously if you go for Cisco or whatever that's mega bucks, but for a regualt home user you can get GigE (1000MB) switches for like 20 GBP or something silly.

    5. Re:And she's surfing this on what exactly? by Teron · · Score: 1

      Last I heard she had some sort of Cisco router worth roughly a million USD in her garage to support the connection. The actual point was to demonstrate a way to transfer data at 40 Gbps over a fibre originally intended for 10 Gbps.

    6. Re:And she's surfing this on what exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you ever save something on your hard drive when it's available through a multi-Gbps tube? Are you one of those people who "right-click and save as" things? That's so 90's...

  40. Offtopic by bcmm · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the Fortunes file. Dunno why Neuromancer fortunes aren't packaged on Gentoo; they're clearly more important the Zippy or Dune.

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  41. Binary math and disk speeds: by Ridirich · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just so we're clear... This is a Gb connection. Gb is is short for Gigabit, emphasis on the bit. Software and hardware are measured in bytes. There are 8 bits in a byte and honestly I think ISPs put the bit rates in instead of the byte rates to confuse the average customer. Currently we have 4 types of drives: IDE/ATA, SATA, SCSI and Solid State. Their standard transfer rates are as follows: IDE/ATA: 133 MBps SATA: 300 MBps SCSI: 320 MBps SSD: 12.5 MBps Now, this connection was 40 Gbps. The actual speed is 5GBps. With those numbers you can see the transfer speeds are too slow for the hard drives to keep up with the faster internet connection. Max speed (given that a person has a SCSI raid) is 320 MBps or 2.5 Gbps, OC-48 is about as close as it gets.

    1. Re:Binary math and disk speeds: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Memory is that fast though.

    2. Re:Binary math and disk speeds: by datazone · · Score: 1

      you are making the assumption that someone only has a single computer connected to this link.

      The averge geek home has between 1 to 3 computers devices, add in the support for ondemand TV over that internet link, and well, you can start to eat up a good amount of bandwidth.

      Now imagine someone with a big or extended family.

      I am not saying that any family would be able to saturate a 40Gbps link, but this link would probably not be the norm for any family for a while.

      --
      Its spelt "L-I-N-U-X", but pronunced as "Free Beer"
    3. Re:Binary math and disk speeds: by Ridirich · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was. Was my statement incorrect? No. However, you would still need 16 computers in that network with the setup I described just to be able to max out the bandwidth. I don't know of anyone who has an extended family who are ALL on 16 computers at the same time and ALL needing to max the bandwidth, let alone 16 computers with a SCSI array that an entire family is constantly using. It's way overkill, and now they're going to 100 Gb? That's 40 computers maxed out with the setup I described. Insane. Some colleges don't have that many computers in their labs. This is supposedly for a home user? Let hardware technology catch up first. Quite frankly, I am with many of the other posters in saying this is a publicity stunt. It would impress me more if ISPs would start registering their speeds in bytes instead of bits and stop conning the American people.

  42. Too bad... by billybob_jcv · · Score: 1

    ...she has Comcast, which limited her upload speed to 28.8K...

  43. Simpler Solution: by MR.Mic · · Score: 0

    Bike in the nude

  44. I like it by specific_pacific · · Score: 1

    I. do.

  45. Botnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope to god she looks after her PC. Imagine having THAT on your botnet.