Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Look at Martian Salt for Ancient Life

eldavojohn writes "Is there life on Mars? Maybe not, but a better question might be whether or not it has ever existed on Mars? Scientists are claiming that the best indication for this will be in newly found evaporated salt deposits on Mars which they can use to check for cellulose. Here on earth, tiny fuzzy fibers have been found in salt dating back almost 250 million years making it the oldest known evidence of life on earth. Jack Griffith, a microbiologist from UNC, is quoted as saying, 'Cellulose was one of the earliest polymers organisms made during their evolution, so it pops out as the most likely thing you'd find on Mars, if you found anything at all. Looking for it in salt deposits is probably a very good way to go.'"

7 of 116 comments (clear)

  1. Salt and astrobiology by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 4, Informative

    Salt on Mars has been a topic of interest for a while-- I wrote about the implications of Martian salt for Astrobiology a couple of years back, in an article in Astrobiology

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  2. slightly inaccurate summary by cowscows · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The article summary says that the cellulose found in 250 million year old salt is the oldest known evidence for life on Earth. That's not true, there's ample of evidence of life for billions of years before that. The article states that the 250 million year old salt is the oldest biological substance known, which is pretty cool, but there are plenty of other types of evidence for life besides just finding dead tissue.

    --

    One time I threw a brick at a duck.

  3. Return Sample? by Gat0r30y · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wouldn't this require a sample coming back here? It looks like they needed a Scanning Electron Microscope to see the cellulose fibers. It seems to me they would have to return a sample of the salts in order to see anything. Are there any plans for a sample return mission to mars anytime soon?

    --
    Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    1. Re:Return Sample? by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You've been watching too much sci-fi...It's unlikely that something from such a wildly different evolutionary line would even be infectious to us.

      1. We don't know that with any certainty. It may end up being a "contest" to see which side can evolve an advantage over the other first before immunities are built up by both sides.

      2. Mars life may be related. Studies suggest asteroids can blast spores betweens planets.

      It's still pretty rare that diseases jump species here

      But species jumpers also tend to be some of the deadliest. Livestock are notorious for producing whoppers.

  4. No, not oldest evidence of life by mck9 · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, these aren't the oldest known signs of life on earth. There are fossils way older than 250 million years. According to the article, this fuzz is the oldest known **biological material** on earth. Not the same thing.

  5. Bad Summary by algae · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here on earth, tiny fuzzy fibers have been found in salt dating back almost 250 million years making it the oldest known evidence of life on earth.

    What the article actually *says*, is that the fibers themselves are 250 million years old, making them the oldest known biologically-produced material. There's obviously older evidence of life to be found on Earth.

    While I'm nitpicking, "Earth" is capitalized, as it is a proper name.

    --
    Causation can cause correlation
  6. Re:that's not the reason... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To talk about space exploration and ignore real problems is to talk like a thief and a fool. Both of which we have too many of already. Grow up already and enter the real world.

    Well, it's a damned good thing the Queen of Spain didn't think like you.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.