Upgrade Trick Still Present In Vista SP1
Chris Blanc writes "The new Service Pack 1 version of Windows Vista allows end users to purchase the 'upgrade edition' and install it on any PC — with no need to purchase the more expensive 'full edition.' The same behavior was present when Vista was originally released, but the fact that the trick wasn't removed from SP1 suggests that Microsoft executives approved the back door as a way to make the price of Vista more appealing to sophisticated buyers."
I hear Ubuntu allows the full installation on any machine too...
Yeah, ok, I'll accept my -1, Troll.
Is crushing a suspect's child's testicles illegal?
John Yoo: "No, [if] the President thinks he needs to do that."
You're suggesting that sophisticated buyers are buying Vista.
http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
I have a full version of Windows 95 lying around, and it has saved me quite a penny over the years.
It's definitely a scam; there is no reason why the "upgrade" should cost less, since it is identical to the full version and you can "upgrade" using an original disk that wasn't used to install the OS that's currently on the machine.
ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
Would you prefer they repackage it for more, like the RIAA wants to do?
They could do what Symantec, McAfee, and a lot of other vendors do:
Antivirus: $50 - $30 rebate - $20 upgrade rebate
Only it would be
Vista Home Basic: $399 - $100 rebate - $100 upgrade rebate = your price $99
Dear Sucker, we mean Customer:
To get the upgrade rebate, fill in the form with the version and registration keys or "Registered to:" number for both the old and new copies of Windows. Limit one upgrade rebate per new copy. Limit one upgrade credit per old copy. Violators will be persecuted, we mean prosecuted, to the full extent of the law.
Sincerely,
Microsoft Customer Relations
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
sophisticated adj - aware of or able to interpret complex issues
But you've used it in a sentence where you meant "willing to commit fraud to steal a license, but not willing to outright steal the license in its entirety". We don't have an english word that completely covers that, but "criminal" would do. I'd rewrite the last line to end...
"the back door as a way to make Vista more appealing to criminals."
And I'm sure my neighbor leaves his front door unlocked because he wants me to come on in and make a sandwich.
That reminds me: You're outta mayo.
--Your Neighbor
Oooh, ooh, I know, mod parent up, +5 RIAA Tie-in
Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
If you can't manage to install Ubuntu, you deserve to run Windows. Seriously, it's so easy these days. Yeah, Those -1 trolls coming my way, I guess. But someone had to say it.
-- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
The default install of Ubunto 10.whatever-it-is fails on VMware Fusion because Fusion presents the virtual disk as scsi and the front-end to Grub in the installer doesn't get it.
He can capitalize letters and punctuate properly though so I'd cut him some slack.
Quite good, actually. Been slowly moving up in my company, living in a condo with my girlfriend (who last June graduated from Towson and this past October got a job as a 3rd grade special ed teacher.)
We just finished paying off her car, got the last book in the Akira Manga series, managed to obtain an unpunched and unplayed copy of the board game Hero Quest, and my 24th birthday is tomorrow.
All told, things have been great.
Thanks for asking:-)
Living With a Nerd
Don't let that stop you. Many people here speak English fine, but make no sense at all.
"the fact that the trick wasn't removed from SP1 suggests that Microsoft executives approved the back door as a way to make the price of Vista more appealing to sophisticated buyers."
Are you saying that MS deliberately levies an idiot tax on customers who are not smart enough to (well, partially) pirate their product?
That sounds a bit implausible to me.