Slashdot Mirror


Old Subway Cars As Artificial Reef

Pickens writes "Hundreds of retired New York City subway cars are being sunk sixteen nautical miles off Delaware's Indian River Inlet and about 80 feet underwater, continuing the transformation of a barren stretch of ocean floor into a bountiful oasis, carpeted in sea grasses, walled thick with blue mussels and sponges, and teeming with black sea bass and tautog. 'They're basically luxury condominiums for fish,' says Jeff Tinsman, artificial reef program manager for the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. Subway cars are roomy enough to invite certain fish, too heavy to shift easily in storms, and durable enough to avoid throwing off debris for decades. Tinsman particularly favors the newer subway cars with stainless steel on the outside to create reefs. 'We call these the DeLoreans of the deep,' he said. But success comes at a price because other states, seeing Delaware's successes, have started competing for the subway cars, which New York City provides free. 'The secret is out, I guess,' said Michael G. Zacchea, the MTA official in charge of getting rid of New York City's old subway cars."

42 of 169 comments (clear)

  1. Good idea! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    This shore is a good idea! (speaking littorally of course)

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Good idea! by Dahamma · · Score: 5, Funny

      This shore is a good idea! (speaking littorally of course)

      I'd mod you up if I could but the masses probably think you are fishing for mod points...

    2. Re:Good idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, cod. This kind of thing makes me eel. I'm net that kind of buoy, sea? Is there really any porpoise to this, or are we carping and whaling?

      Ok, enough about this tail of roe ...

  2. Fools! by jimmux · · Score: 5, Funny

    'We call these the DeLoreans of the deep,'

    You fools! If the dolphins develop time travel there will be no stopping them!

    1. Re:Fools! by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      they could probably make 88mph o_o what has science done?!

  3. Very apt by Finallyjoined!!! · · Score: 4, Informative
    Nice one :-)

    littoral -adjective 1. of or pertaining to the shore of a lake, sea, or ocean.


    --
    If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
  4. Oceans need more man made stuff in them! by Shadukar · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. dump some old trash in the previously perfectly fine ocean
    2. ???
    3. LUXURY CONDOMINIUMS FOR FISH

    1. Re:Oceans need more man made stuff in them! by Scruffy+Dan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      in the previously perfectly fine ocean
      The ocean hasn't been previously fine for a very long time now.
      --
      Just another crappy blog
    2. Re:Oceans need more man made stuff in them! by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We've also been leaving large steel objects on the ocean floor for quite some time (>100 years), both accidentally and deliberately . These are the least of our concerns when talking about ocean pollution. If you actually want to do something about the ocean start talking about the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, because that's far more harmful to marine life then a few sunken subway cars or ships that actually provide shelter for fish and a surface for coral to grow on.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:Oceans need more man made stuff in them! by electrictroy · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've seen videos on History and Discovery Channel. It isn't one giant mass of garbage. It's a nice clear ocean, and then suddenly your ship will come-upon a ship-sized "mass" of accumulated garbage just floating in the middle of noplace. The ocean currents tend to gather trash in a few discrete locations (which should make it easy to clean-up, if any nation decided to take-on that task).

      re: Running out of cars.

      If they find themselves running out of New York subway cars, maybe they could try using passenger cars. We've got plenty of them laying around, just waiting to become a "fish condo".

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
  5. Typo by arotenbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Subway cars are roomy enough to invite certain fish, too heavy to shift easily in storms, and durable enough that we won't have to care about them throwing off debris for decades. There, fixed it for you.
    --
    Tomato wedge sperm darts that are Republican.
  6. The last thing I need when I scuba diving by Centurix · · Score: 4, Funny

    Getting mugged by a harpoon weilding, cowry shell demanding aquatic gang member. Insane.

    --
    Task Mangler
  7. asbestos by dancingmad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I actually read this article earlier today (they're coming for my slashdot credibility card!) and it mentioned the amount of asbestos and other materials in the cars. Does anyone know how that comes into play in a marine environment?

    --
    "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    1. Re:asbestos by McNally · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does anyone know how that comes into play in a marine environment?
      Clearly the fish will be at an increased risk of lung cancer.
    2. Re:asbestos by adolf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Asbestos is a real danger to humans because it gets stuck in lungs. Fish, lacking lungs, shouldn't have this problem. Stuff goes *through* the gills, not into and out of them. My experience keeping fish shows that solids regularly pass through the gills of fish in the process of eating.

      The asbestos is probably safer down there than anywhere else, I'd guess.

    3. Re:asbestos by CannonballHead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As far as I recall, asbestos is really only dangerous to human lungs because, when "disturbed" in an open air environment, it disperses into rather tiny particles that annoy your lungs rather severely.

      I'm not sure entirely what relevance that has to a water environment, except that it seems fish's gills work significantly differently than human lungs.

    4. Re:asbestos by pherthyl · · Score: 5, Funny

      On the other hand their risk of dying in a fire will decrease drastically..

    5. Re:asbestos by aztektum · · Score: 4, Funny

      except that it seems fish's gills work significantly differently than human lungs. that may explain how they can survive underwater?
      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
  8. Re:Memories by robo_mojo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry, it got stuck in my head
    Please keep it there!
  9. Like some new large winery cellars. by niktemadur · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With an eye on recycling materials and reducing construction costs for storage cellars, some wineries in northern Mexico have opted for this great idea:
    Dig a deep trench, place old RR cars inside, then fill the trench up again with dirt. And there it is, a cave build like a Lego. A little bit of retrofitting may be necessary, especially where car doors meet, but still, you can save a ton of money in this fashion.
    Surely, not only Mexican wineries are using the same technique.

    --
    Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    1. Re:Like some new large winery cellars. by Scruffy+Dan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      usually it is those with the most limited resources that come up with those kinds of ideas.

      --
      Just another crappy blog
    2. Re:Like some new large winery cellars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's why so many patents are partially or fully credited to hobos or derelicts.

  10. Scrap metal value ? by artg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought scrap metal values had gone insane recently - I know this is a sort of recycling, but I'm surprised the cars aren't worth a lot for the steel.

  11. Nifty but not a new idea. by Werkhaus · · Score: 3, Informative

    Brisbane,QLD has had an old Brisbane Transport tram as part of the Curtin Artificial Reef since 1981.
    http://www.urgq.org/curtin_artif_reef.htm

  12. Re:2000 years from now... by drspliff · · Score: 5, Funny
    New york was where?

    "A new discovery by our great leader shows ancient American maps may be off by 200 miles, our great leaders scientists believe New York may have been situated at the opening of the Delaware Bay; alternative theories suggest these submerged relics may have been attributed somehow to experiments at the Black Mesa facility (formerly CERN-LHC) in 2009"

    [history] (net.earth.news) 34899 points posted 3 mars hours ago by GreatLeader

    Halliburton retaliates against France!

    "The Great Leader has sent supporting troops to support Halliburton forces in retaliation following French aggression last week against the sovereign nation. Live holostream and kill-cam with Geraldo Rivera's clone from 7pm."

    [worldnews] (net.earth.actualités) 19148 points posted 5 mars hours ago by GreatLeader
  13. In BC we sink old ships to make habitats... by WoTG · · Score: 4, Informative

    Out here we've sunken many ships to make underwater habitats for fish. The boats are stripped of oils, paints, and hazardous stuff before sinking -- well, nowadays, anyway. Great for scuba divers to look at, so I've been told.

    I can't find a great link in 10s of searching, but this is a start:
    http://www.divingbc.com/

    1. Re:In BC we sink old ships to make habitats... by Skater · · Score: 4, Informative

      Check out the fate of the aircraft carrier USS Orisanky. New York has been dropping subway cars this way for a long time: here are some pictures of Redbird cars being sunk this way several years ago (site requires Javascript so they can show you annoying sliding ads on both sides).

    2. Re:In BC we sink old ships to make habitats... by malkavian · · Score: 4, Informative

      Speaking as a Scuba Diver, these artificial reefs are great. It takes a few years to build up life, but eventually, it becomes a great habitat for a huge variety of life. Even in the early days, you get a lot of 'visitors' as fish start poking round in all the nooks and crannies.
      Over time, decay does set in, and the 'debris' does come loose. This isn't like street litter though. It tends to stay close to the wreck, and the fragments that are too small tend to rust away rather quickly, or be abraded to a sand.
      There are reasonably strict regulations on what can be dumped in as an artificial reef (oil, and all the nasty sea life killing stuff is removed first). And as far as studies go, there's a rich history of wrecks, some of which went down without any cleaning whatsoever, and they are invariably colonised quite rapidly by sea life. Empirical evidence is there aplenty. And with the newer reefs, there are many scuba divers frequenting them (and a good portion of scuba divers are very possessive of the environment, as we get to see the real damage done by running roughshod over it).

  14. Bioaccumulation fears by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hoopla, I tried for ten minutes find anything about the negative impacts of artificial reefs, using Google Scholar ( http://scholar.google.com/ ).

    I used "artificial" and "reefs" in combinations with words like "bioaccumulation", "pcb", "tyres", "pollutants", "chemicals", etc.

    Surprisingly, I only found statements like "needs more research", "no measurable effect" and no-brainers like that.

    Could it be that I missed those true alarmist reports I guessed would be there?! One read like:

    http://www.flseagrant.org/program_areas/ecosystem_health/artificial_reefs/index.htm#21

    "The oil ash and control reefs were constructed with the aid of divers in just one day, and monitoring of the reefs was carried out for one year. Leaching of trace metals from the blocks was extremely slow, and only limited instances of enhanced bioaccumulation of metals were observed. However, pressure from environmental groups led the electric power industry and the State of Florida to discontinue construction of artificial reefs from stabilized waste material."

    I don't want to play this in the hands of waste mongers, but hope some could actually find some more conclusive results.

    Don't get me wrong. Play it safe, please.

    .

    1. Re:Bioaccumulation fears by saforrest · · Score: 3, Informative
      Could it be that I missed those true alarmist reports I guessed would be there?! One read like:

      It's not a scholarly reference, but there are definitely clear examples of deliberately-constructed artificial reefs which were ultimately damaging to marine ecology. Read about the Osborne Reef Waste Tire Removal Pilot Project in Florida:

      The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is partnering with the Broward County Environmental Protection Department, Navy Salvage Divers from Norfolk, VA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Marine Debris Program to conduct a pilot project to remove waste tires from a site known as the Osborne Reef. Approximately 2 million tires covering 36 acres were placed in the water off Broward County in the 1970s to create artificial reefs. Today the tires are physically damaging coral reefs as storms move the tires toward the shore. A pilot project will collect sample tires to determine how the 2 million tire pile can be collected and disposed of properly.
  15. Oh I hope they know what they are doing by slew · · Score: 5, Informative
    I remember a long time ago when people tried to dump old tires in the ocean with the thought that they could form the basis for an artificial reef. Apparently that didn't work out so well...

    Maybe it'll work out better this time...

    1. Re:Oh I hope they know what they are doing by edwardpickman · · Score: 4, Funny

      They also have dumped a considerable amount of nuclear waste and nerve gas into the oceans. Don't worry though that was decades ago and the barrels should last 50 years.

    2. Re:Oh I hope they know what they are doing by rampant+poodle · · Score: 3, Informative

      Fortunately there is a big difference between old tires and subway cars, (in both the composition and mass). This is more like sunken ships. Ships of wood, steel, and concrete have provided excellent marine habitat for a very long time. Those that are sunk intentionally as reefs get stripped/cleaned of hazardous materials before going down. Wartime and accidental sinkings aren't as "green" - but still work pretty well.

      In a previous life I worked on fishing boats out of Indian River Inlet. There was already a good selection of wrecks in the area, including an U-Boot from WWII. All the wrecks are hot spots both for fish and for divers.

  16. Re:global warming by Eivind · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wouldn't make much of a difference either way to global warming.

    To the degree it increases marine biomass, it's just as effective as increasing any OTHER biomass for capyuring CO2. So in theory it would decrease global warming.

    Much too small an effect to be measurable.

    It -has- been suggested that spreading iron on the ocean in areas where lack of iron is the limiter on plant-growth would allow much more plants to grow and thus capture a lot of CO2. I think the biggest uncertanity there was for how -long- the CO2 would stay out of the atmosphere.

    If a significant fraction of the dead plants sink, retention would be good, hundreds of years at the very least. If most of them decompose near the surface and the CO2 is released from the water, there wouldn't be much benefit.

  17. Story underplays the most important fact by benwiggy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did no-one else notice the most important part of this story?

    You can get subway cars for free!

    I'll have five, thanks.

  18. Great Idea. by RandoX · · Score: 3, Funny

    They should do this with barrels of nuclear waste too.

  19. Re:2000 years from now... by dstates · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Artificial reefs have not been a universal success. The State of Florida is spending millions to clean up dumped tires from the Osborne Reef.

    --
    Statesman
  20. You get more band from copper by aepervius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    scrap steel metal only very recently became really expansive (within the last two monthes).

    look at the fourth column for scrap steel price. See how much it rose in the last 2-3 monthes and over last year.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  21. Re:Somehow this seems TOO convenient by vbraga · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Due to diffusion, you really shouldn't get pockets of concentrated copper-water. Nature dislikes concentration gradients (Fick's Law of Diffusion).

    --
    English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.
  22. Re:2000 years from now... by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 3, Informative

    That is because the tires are causing more hard then good. The subway cars allow more natural things to grow on them and hide in them. And the subway cars will go away over time leaving the natural stuff behind. Virginia has been doing this for what 5-8 years now? It does work to bring more fish to the area. The summer flounder numbers were way up (along with black sea bass, and others) until the commercial guys dragged their nets through the reef locations. These artificial reef locations are off limits to commercial fishing it is posted on all the charts. So, they just dumped a bunch of tanks off the cost as well.

    They used tanks since the commercial fishing guys were dragging their nets all through the subway cars and other off limit (for commercial fishing) places. They lose more gear on the tanks and will hopefully stop 'fishing' there.

  23. Re:CSI NY by Loconut1389 · · Score: 3, Informative

    i shouldn't have been so lazy, but they are the same trains!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redbird_trains
    "Most Redbirds were phased out from 2001 to 2003 and replaced by the new R142 and R142A cars. 1,208 Redbirds have been sunk at sea off the coasts of Delaware, Georgia, New Jersey, South Carolina, and Virginia as artificial reefs to promote marine life, to serve as a barrier and to enhance recreational scuba diving. Delaware received 558 cars, Georgia 50, New Jersey 250, South Carolina 200, and Virginia 150. An episode of CSI NY titled "The Deep" used these cars as part of the story line, and even featured well-repkucated underwater shots of mockups of the cars. However, the show places them in the East River of New York City."

  24. Re:Somehow this seems TOO convenient by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you had RTFA you would had read that this is not new. The site off the cost of DE has had subway cars for about 10 years now. With an increasing number of people going their every year. And the subway cars are just the shell, no seats, no plastics, no oils, no wiring just the main metal of the car.

    Here is another article: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=980CE7DA153EF93BA15757C0A9649C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all Where they actually say what they do to the cars.