Slashdot Mirror


IBM Creates Working "Racetrack Memory"

holy_calamity writes "IBM has created the first working 'racetrack memory' device — a technology we've discussed as it's been touted as the future of memory. It works by writing bits using the magnetic domains inside a very thin wire. Those domain can be shunted along this 'racetrack' and past read heads."

99 comments

  1. Sounds like... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... bubble memory. Welcome to 1968.

    1. Re:Sounds like... by thered2001 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Or a wire recorder...welcome to 1938.

      --

      If your only tool is a hammer, every problem becomes a nail.

    2. Re:Sounds like... by synesis · · Score: 1, Informative

      Or a mercury delay line storage.

    3. Re:Sounds like... by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      I was wondering if anyone else noticed that. The more things change...

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    4. Re:Sounds like... by Windows+Breaker+G4 · · Score: 1

      Kinda like the diesel engine running on vegetable oil and the electric car coming back?

      --
      brickspeed.net for your old Volvo performance addiction
    5. Re:Sounds like... by meatmanek · · Score: 1

      Actually, sounds more like Twistor memory.

    6. Re:Sounds like... by hey! · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ah, you beat me to it. The mercury delay lines were readily available because they had been developed for radar systems in WW2.

      CRT based memory was also, in a sense, a product of radar. If you've seen early radar depictions from old movies, you had this kind of linear cursor started at the center of a round CRT tube and went to the edge. The end swept around the perimeter of the display, and when a line crossed a "blip", it would be refreshed. Over the next couple of seconds the blip would fade and the sweeping line would refresh the blip in a slightly different place. The persistence of phosphors on the screen were a kind of short term memory, so it's not surprising that engineers familiar with radar hit on the idea of making CRT storage units.

      Random access is not the only memory model ever used in computers, nor is it the only one that will ever be used in the future. This is one of the reasons CS students are taught to regard polynomial time differences between classes of algorithms as relatively unimportant in a theoretical sense, although they are obviously important in a practical sense.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    7. Re:Sounds like... by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Packard Bell did machines with mercury delays & CRT storage in the 1960s

      http://research.swtch.com/2008/04/computing-history-at-bell-labs.html

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    8. Re:Sounds like... by ChrisLeif · · Score: 1

      Mercury delay line. Welcome to the 1950's. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delay_line_memory

    9. Re:Sounds like... by BountyX · · Score: 1

      I swear slashdot has the funniest sigs...

      --
      Trying to install linux on my microwave, but keep getting a kernel panic...
    10. Re:Sounds like... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Ah, no. Mercury delay line storage actually used acoustic waves in a tube of mercury to store pulses, which were regenerated by amplifiers and sent back into the tube by the actuator. This thing with the loop of wire and the magnetic bits moving while the wire stays still sounds much more like the idea of magnetic bubbles in bubble memory.

    11. Re:Sounds like... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Can disco be far behind?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    12. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can disco be far behind? We can only hope...
  2. Bubble memory by threaded · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't be the first one to read this and think, eh, isn't this just bubble memory?

    1. Re:Bubble memory by Raineer · · Score: 1

      So fill me in on the details, did this work back then? If it's already in existence and supposedly better, why is no one making it? Or is it just not better? Honest questions, I have no idea and don't always trust wiki 'opinions' :) Thanks

    2. Re:Bubble memory by beckerist · · Score: 1

      I have no idea and don't always trust wiki 'opinions'

      But you trust ours?!

    3. Re:Bubble memory by flyingfsck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Original HP pocket calculators used bubble memory. Yes, I am that old...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    4. Re:Bubble memory by Raineer · · Score: 1

      Touche' Hit me with some logic and see how it goes :) lol

    5. Re:Bubble memory by kevmatic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, it worked, alright. But it took forever for the information to get around the loop, leading to large seek times, and they couldn't push it over a mbit a chip. I'm thinking they used actual wire while IBM is probably lithographically defining it like a CPU transistor. And yes, they used it. If you look closely at any CNC machine shop that's been around for a while, you'll probably find one or two machines from the era with bubble memory, still whirring away. CNC machines, for many many years, had to keep pushing the limits of computer technology to keep up with their motors and sensing systems.

    6. Re:Bubble memory by SleptThroughClass · · Score: 1

      Hit me with some logic
      DL, RTL, DTL, or TTL?
    7. Re:Bubble memory by leighklotz · · Score: 1

      Original HP pocket calculators used bubble memory. Which model? MoHPC says there was a non-production prototype series called Roadrunner that was to use bubble memory but makes no mention of it in any production device.

    8. Re:Bubble memory by IAN · · Score: 1

      Original HP pocket calculators used bubble memory.

      Um, no. The HP 9100A used core memory (both parts of ROM and all of RAM), but that was a honking big desktop machine. All pocket calculators used PMOS RAM until the appearance of "continuous memory" (CMOS) models.

  3. Imagine an infinite-length wire "track" by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you had an infinite-length track, you could theoretically encode data which could itself be interpreted as processor instructions. Then, given these instructions, you could move back and forth within this track and read data and further instructions. With a fairly minimum number of instructions, it would be possible to synthesize more complex instruction batches.

    This sounds like such a great idea. I wish I had it already!

    1. Re:Imagine an infinite-length wire "track" by Deltaspectre · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I had an infinite length track, I'd sell it for infinite money.

      --
      My UID is prime... is yours?
    2. Re:Imagine an infinite-length wire "track" by thewiz · · Score: 1

      ...you could move back and forth within this track and read data and further instructions.


      If you play instructions to a CPU backwards, would the computer spout Satanic messages?
      --
      If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    3. Re:Imagine an infinite-length wire "track" by itlurksbeneath · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmm... To use a car analogy (this is Slashdot, right?): if you had a car on an infinite-length track, would it be the ultimate Touring Machine?

      Cue groans...

      --
      Have you ever considered piracy? You'd make a wonderful Dread Pirate Roberts.
    4. Re:Imagine an infinite-length wire "track" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would execute a satanic program; namely ... forget it. Too easy.

    5. Re:Imagine an infinite-length wire "track" by Shinmizu · · Score: 1

      I don't believe so. I've heard it decompiles Windows Vista into COBOL for your reading pleasure.

    6. Re:Imagine an infinite-length wire "track" by thewiz · · Score: 1

      decompiles Windows Vista into COBOL


      Definitely Satanic on both ends.
      --
      If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    7. Re:Imagine an infinite-length wire "track" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *groan*

    8. Re:Imagine an infinite-length wire "track" by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      To ring the patent office or not to ring, that is the question.

  4. The old is new again by hcdejong · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    So, this is basically a solid-state version of mercury delay lines?

    1. Re:The old is new again by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Or plated wire memory.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  5. FTFA by Oxy+the+moron · · Score: 3, Funny

    The first ever racetrack memory device is able to store and read three bits of data using the racetrack method.

    Bit 1 - Did something?
    Bit 2 - ??????
    Bit 3 - Profited?

    --

    Proudly supporting the Libertarian Party.

  6. Turing Machine! by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
    1. Re:Turing Machine! by somersault · · Score: 4, Interesting
      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Turing Machine! by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      Revoke my geek card if you must, but on being chalenged to make a lego computer, I'd just use an RCX. ;) Yea, I'm lazy and have no sense of wonder.

    3. Re:Turing Machine! by hey! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, as a practical matter you probably wouldn't make linear memory with a single read head that was billions of bits long. Nor would you be likely to treat it as such in your programs, although you might have clever adjustments to your algorithms that take its overall performance characteristics into account, the way that people take the performance characteristics of hard disks as a kind of unspoken assumption.

      For that matter, modern random access memory is really more of an abstraction than a reality. Programmers usually don't worry about things like memory pages except in a kind of statistical way. The address you want may be in cache, or it may be in DRAM or it may be in the paging file.

      Most programmers have been living with an abstraction for a very long time, which is that there are two kinds of memory: fast, volatile random access memory and slow, persistent "external" memory. This seems like it is a fundamental difference, but it is really quite arbitrary. You could treat a robotic tape library as a massive, but slow random access persistent memory, if that suited your purposes. Different aspects of flash memory straddle different parts of the divide between working memory and persistent storage.

      I'd say the single thing most likely to really change over the next twenty years is this neat two way division of memory, especially as mobile and embedded devices become more common.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Turing Machine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What crackhead mod modded this offtopic? You idiot. The parent was answer the question the gp begged. Need more explanation? The machine the gp is describing is a Turing machine. Christ. It's like we've got SAT essay scorers for mods. Don't even consider content, just length and if at a glance it seems to be on topic.

    5. Re:Turing Machine! by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      I find it extra amusing that Turing machine is offtopic, but Lego Turing machine is informative.

    6. Re:Turing Machine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So explaining a joke is modded off-topic? Also, I'm quite surprised that there are people on Slashdot who don't understand what a Turing Machine is.

    7. Re:Turing Machine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like we've got SAT essay scorers for mods.

      Adapting a joke I heard today....

      What did the moderators get on their SATs?

      BBQ Sauce

      Thanks. I'll be here all week. Try the veal.

    8. Re:Turing Machine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might have clever adjustments to your algorithms... Oh you mean like drum memory?

      Fun story about a real programmer, involving drum memory.
      http://www.pbm.com/~lindahl/mel.html

    9. Re:Turing Machine! by Jurily · · Score: 1

      I'd say the single thing most likely to really change over the next twenty years is this neat two way division of memory, especially as mobile and embedded devices become more common. Oh, please no. I already lost an mp3 player because of that. Memory got corrupted, the whole thing froze, and it's persistent across battery changes. Even the firmware updates were software only.

      Of course, I previously voided the warranty as I did a firmware update (the updated version had no arbitrary volume limit imposed on it, and also it enabled the built-in radio).

      From that day on I only buy things I can reboot.
    10. Re:Turing Machine! by LarsG · · Score: 1

      It is quite obvious what the gp was hinting at, so answering "Turing Machine!" is firmly in the whoosh, missed the point, Mr. Obvious, no really?, duh, fail category.

      "Lego Turing Machine" is fun/informative.

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
    11. Re:Turing Machine! by LarsG · · Score: 1

      Explaining an obvious joke should really be modded redundant.

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
  7. this won't take off soon by OrochimaruVoldemort · · Score: 1

    it will be a few years before this is practical, and even then, people won't buy it. new motherboards will have to be introduced, ultimately resulting in have to get a new pc (if you are a business). so slashdotters, i would hold off for, lets say, 7 years before getting this.

    --
    If people can get past, can they get future? Best way to confuse a stoner
    1. Re:this won't take off soon by CogDissident · · Score: 1

      Why would it need new motherboards? Its just the internal method of data storage and retrieval. Its entirely possible that early versions of this drive could use SATA connections and just be cheaper and faster than current drives (rather than extraordinarily faster, if it needs a different kind of motherboard connection).

    2. Re:this won't take off soon by pipatron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh! New motherboards would have to be introduced! That could take some time to switch to indeed, because it's quite rare that such a thing happens.

      Except for the switch from DRAM to SDRAM. And the switch from SDRAM to DDR, and from DDR to DDR2, and from DDR2 to DDR3, and from AGP to PCI-e, and from IDE to SATA, and.. and.. ad infinitum.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    3. Re:this won't take off soon by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Cause a new PC would be so expensive?

      You should have stopped here:"It will be a few years before this is practical"

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    4. Re:this won't take off soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Your sarcasm is well targeted. I think techies forget how fast things evolve, because they fail to appreciate incremental increases.

      Ten years ago we weren't using PCI Express, and AGP was extremely new.. we were mostly using PCI graphics cards! 3D support wasn't even common at the time. We were surfing the information superhighway at 33.6kbps, 20GB was considered a lot, and black and white laptops were still reasonably common!

    5. Re:this won't take off soon by LarsG · · Score: 1

      Cause a new PC would be so expensive? Yeah, I'm sure buying a new motherboard will be reeeeeal expensive compared to the cost of the first sticks of Racetrack RAM you buy.

      Anyway, if people bothered to RTFA (hey, one can wish) they would see that they expect racetrack memory to first be used for storage - which means you will connect the stuff through sata/pci/pci-e or other existing buses. Using Racetrack as a replacement for RAM is in the 7year+ range.
      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
  8. hello by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldly like the for hourse spaghetti in turn specimenologized crimes,__?

  9. racetrack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Racetrack is the twelfth Cylon?

  10. I wouldn't say new or first by lcreech · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Doesn't anyone remember the "bubble memory"? from the 70's and 80's and was a loop racetrack type device.

    1. Re:I wouldn't say new or first by m.dillon · · Score: 1

      I caught the tail-end of the bubble memory era, even bought a few chips and played with it, but it became extinct very quickly (probably due to dynamic ram going into volume production just as the TRS/Atari/Apple/Commodore era took off.

      -Matt

  11. Need an analogy by Cryophallion · · Score: 5, Funny

    Without a proper Light -Distance analogy I have no way of being impressed by the speed of device. Is it knuckle to knee? Nose to toe? People need to know these things!

  12. Eh.. English ? by bytesex · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    'Those domain can be shunted along this 'racetrack' and past read heads.'

    What does that sentence even mean ?

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    1. Re:Eh.. English ? by hostyle · · Score: 1

      Hang on. Somethings coming through on the teletype: dominatrix ... shunting ... racey ... red heads!

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
  13. Older than Dirt! by Number6.2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delay_line_memory

    --
    "If god did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him" --Voltaire
  14. Correct me if I'm wrong, by jockeys · · Score: 3, Interesting

    but hasn't this been done in the past with electrical pulses sent down a very long wire? In a loop? So long ago that registers were called accumulators?

    I remember my OpSys prof showing us one of these things that was new and shiny when HE was in school. Basically just a long (couple km, I think) wire wrapped up in a small coil the size of a shoebox that acted as RAM by sending pulses around the loop, reading them and then sending them again... the delay of electrons traveling the loop acted as extra space, until you were sending pulses continuously. Sort of like a circular stack.

    Anyone else see some similarities here?

    --

    In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    1. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong, by Mike+McTernan · · Score: 1

      Or even sound through Mercury Delay lines...

      --
      -- Mike
  15. That's nothin' by Jupiter+Jones · · Score: 5, Funny

    Meh.

    Wake me when they come up with "Hot Dog" or "Crashdown" memory.

    JJ

  16. Great for Microsoft Windows. by splutty · · Score: 1

    If this gets used a lot, at least Microsoft can blame all their problems on 'race track memory things crashing'.

    This is brilliant for them!

    Seriously, though. The idea of storing bits on top of each other instead of alongside each other does give a much smaller footprint, and from what I understand from what I've read some 3 years ago, also a much better speed vs thermal efficiency.

    --
    Coz eternity my friend, is a long *ing time.
  17. Re:Race track, but what kind? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    I'm hoping it's a Formula 1 Circuit

    Nope, more like NASCAR. Just a bunch of bits turning left for 500 ns.

  18. You mean DNA? by EgoWumpus · · Score: 1

    I assume that is what you were getting at; after all that is pretty much how DNA works, only without needing an infinite track.

    --

    [Ego]out

    1. Re:You mean DNA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he means a Turing Machine. YUO FAIL IT.

  19. For primary storage by foniksonik · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The interesting thing is that they feel it is capable of being primary storage...so we're talking Terabytes...

    Could be interesting.

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    1. Re:For primary storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no- primary storage is working memory ie RAM, terabytes is currently, and for most situations for quite a while, secondary storage e.g. hard drives, tape.

    2. Re:For primary storage by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      If they can get this to work (including withstanding billions of re-writes), we're talking a completely solid-state storage device that could store at minimum couple of terabytes in the same form factor as today's ATA-100/133 and Serial ATA drives. Imagine loading Linux--including the full graphical environment!--or even Windows in under 10 seconds! :-)

    3. Re:For primary storage by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      An AC has already pointed this out, but "Primary Storage" in the typical computer model is what we would consider RAM. Hard Drives and other "storage" media are considered to be "Secondary Storage". Primary Storage also consists of cache, and I believe processor registers. Removable media, is often called "Offline Storage" or "Tertiary Storage"

      The relevant Wiki article is: Computer Storage; specifically the sections: Primary Storage, and Secondary Storage.

      The overall point I'm trying to make here is, we're talking gigabytes, and it's still very interesting.

    4. Re:For primary storage by foniksonik · · Score: 1
      From TFA:

      His calculations suggest it could provide faster, cheaper and higher capacity storage than RAM or hard disk storage.

      I'll stand by my statement.



      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  20. Compared to PMC? by babymac · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anyone have any idea how this compares to programmable metallization cell technology which made the news recently? How close to production is PMC vs racetrack memory?

    --
    "War makes me sad." - Me
  21. For some reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...'RaceTrack' reminds me of 'TokenRing'

    1. Re:For some reason... by Chaoticmass · · Score: 1

      ...'RaceTrack' reminds me of 'TokenRing' I came here to say that.
  22. business machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    first they "Ship Fastest CPU on Earth" now this. all after loosing 300K jobs and being fucked by EPA. what the hell is going on at IBM? has the The Large Hadron Collider been turned on already? should we be expecting lots of zombies on pink unicorns anytime soon? sheeeeeet.

  23. Sequential Access by GottliebPins · · Score: 1

    So they're saying sequential access is better than dynamic access? What's the advantage in that? Oh wait, I need to access data at location $ff00, let me spin the bits around the track a few thousand times til I get to that memory location. Duh?

    1. Re:Sequential Access by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Oh man you hit the nail on the head buddy! What a bunch of idiots overthere! Don't they know anything? I always say, for any resarch project everyone should just post their idea to slashdot and see what comes up with the comments before they even spend a dime on it. Often you'll always find that:

      a) What you're doing doesn't make any sense whatsoever based on that article I read a few years ago.
      b) What you're doing was done 50 years ago and was better because that's what I did in my day.
      c) What you're doing breaks most of the laws of physics I don't really understand.
      d) You need to figure out step 2 before making a profit.
      e) Its already been done in reverse in Russia.
      f) There's a wiki link on something sort of related to that other thing that has the same letters as this.
      g) Your idea has already been implemented by this site also hosting a picture of a gaping anus.

      Seriously we need to just drop all peer-review and send papers this way. For science!

  24. 1964: Outer Limits - Demon with a Glass Hand by jerryasher · · Score: 1

    Demon with a Glass Hand by Harlan Ellison tells the story of a man who can only remember the past ten days struggling to determine who he is, why he has a glass hand with missing fingers, and why an alien race is trying to kill him.

    In the denouement a very important copper wire with very high density storage is central.

    44 year old spoilers at the link.

  25. ah... by apodyopsis · · Score: 1

    I'm too young to remember bubble memory, but don't worry Google is my friend and the (ever so) helpful /.r's will correct any errors in their normal polite, restrained and helpful fashion.

    From what I understand you created a circular magnetic field and then loaded a pattern into in, moving it around the field and past the read area to determine the data value. The pattern density was very high and the loops were printed onto the surface of the device, a bit like the old 80s game donkey kong they were joined into one big loop. They peaked at around 1Mbit size in the 80s, before more conventional technology was developed to replace them.

    By using a very very thin wire as the loop, IBM have further increased the data density, and modern high speed electronics allows faster access time. Key to the new idea is the technology to move the data around the wire - this is the novel part of the invention.

    This offers low cost, high storage volatile storage devices to maybe replace existing RAM technology.

  26. Sounds kinda like.. by ChronoFish · · Score: 1

    A miniature token ring.... That went over well for IBM...

    -CF

  27. first computer memory was a "racetrack" device by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Before they perfected magnetic storage, acoustic delay queues in mercury were used as secondary memory.

  28. Place your bets .. by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    Come on down to Racetrack Memory.

    Set your data running the loop and then sit back and watch the fun.

    Have drunken parties as you watch you bits speed around the course.

    Place bets on your bits coming in first, a place, or if you are feeling really lucky plonk your money down for a trifecta.

    Its so much fun for the whole family that even if you lose you still win!!

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  29. Timeline by audubon · · Score: 3, Funny

    The first ever racetrack memory device is able to store and read three bits of data using the racetrack method.
    Assuming memory capacity doubles every two years, IBM expects to have a 64 kilobyte version ready by mid 2025.
  30. Racetrack Memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recall as a teenager going to the race track with the family for New Years. My parents let me place a couple of two dollar bets. I even won a bit of money from the adventure.

    Now that I see that IBM is creating Race Trace Memories, I'm not sure if this is actually mine now, or inserted into my brain by some IBM affiliate.

    Curse You!

  31. No betting by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Funny

    on the racetrack memory results. "Come on, NAND gate#7. Lucky #7! Daddy needs a new iPod"

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:No betting by martin_henry · · Score: 1

      I've got some inside info on #3's mean free path...

      --
      www.purevolume.com/martyd
  32. Why? by toporok · · Score: 1

    Is it me or old is new again? I'm getting tired of seeing things we've already done and moved on being broght back as the next best thing. And why would we want to move from solid state to a something that has moving parts. What if you drop it? Will it jump the "racetrack"?!

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What moving parts? Solid state is not the opposite of moving parts, you doofus. What if you drop anything? Idiot.

    2. Re:Why? by toporok · · Score: 1

      My bad, that's what I get for trying to multitask. Did not read the whole article and "ass-u-me-d" that wire was moving.

  33. wire spool recordings by Tungbo · · Score: 1

    perfect for passing information inside POW camps.

    "I see Nuthin... I know Nuthin...."

  34. there are still some issues to be resolved... by Khopesh · · Score: 1

    Ars Technica picked this up yesterday and has a pretty good run-down of how it works (complete with a pretty illustration).

    They also provide Links to the Science articles themselves:

    It's promising, but there are still some lingering issues:

    There is still work to do before an entire three-dimensional memory chip will replace your current memory solutions. The biggest problem may be heat; moving DWs requires a high current, which may destroy the wire or mangle the data it contains. Still, there are some ideas on how to deal with the heat, and this work represents a big step in the direction of a new dimension in memory storage.
    --
    Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
  35. Racetrack, eh? by kamikaze2112 · · Score: 0

    I dunno, but I'm not sure I want my memory making left turns all day long...

  36. I'm a Chinese and I predicted this technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a Chinese and I predicted this several years ago in a Chinese IT forum during the time when Wii is just announced and not yet named as Wii.

    The forum is www.jg1998.org, a forum for talented high school programmers. I use the name of æå¦åé to predict the next generation of hard disk which also serves as RAM and have the fast speed of RAM. If you don't believe me, go ask the people at jg1998 or search the internet archive.

    I think I even send a mail to a top 5 tech company in China using mathchicken@yahoo.com and persuade them to do research in this area (hard disk that use RAM technology, a hard disk that can serve as RAM).

    No Chinese took interest in my ideas and took action despite me giving my ideas for free. Now it's America being the first again, being the innovator again, and being the leader again.

  37. Prior Art by Jaazaniah · · Score: 1

    There are magnetized wires out there with analog sound recordings on them from the days before vinyl. This is nothing new, and without a better control and recall system, is highly inefficient. Now, if the patent deals with the control system, kudos to IBM. If it deals with just the idea of selectively magnetizing a wire set, this has already been done. Google wire recording if you want more info.