Slashdot Mirror


Flowers' Smell Not Traveling As Far

Ant writes in to note a study indicating that, because of air pollution, the smell of flowers is not wafting as far as it once did. Pollutants from power plants and automobiles destroy flowers' aromas, the study suggests: "The scent molecules produced by flowers in a less polluted environment, such as in the 1800s, could travel for roughly 1,000 to 1,200 meters; but in today's polluted environment downwind of major cities, they may travel only 200 to 300 meters." The finding could help explain why some pollinators, particularly bees, are declining in certain parts of the world.

13 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. Brilliant by kramulous · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this mean I don't have to wear deodorant anymore?

    --
    .
    1. Re:Brilliant by TheLink · · Score: 4, Funny

      Uh in this case you're probably the pollutant not the flower :).

      --
    2. Re:Brilliant by MrNaz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, are you sure you are wearing deodorant and not crude oil?

      --
      I hate printers.
  2. From the gut feeling dept. by Nyckname · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I still can't help but think that insecticides are having more to do with it. Bee keepers carry hives around to the farms. It's not like they have to fly too far to find the flowers, but hives are collapsing at farms.

  3. hmmm... by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 4, Funny

    can't they just genetically engineer flowers with more potent aromas?

    then we will inevitably have a /. story about long delays getting the product developed, and the whole idea of new smelly flowers will get tagged as vaporware, which would be an entirely inappropriate tag.

    --
    -I only code in BASIC.-
  4. No sense of smell by digitalchinky · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have no sense of smell. Prior to about 16 years of age I honestly thought people were making it up. I thought the sense of smell was all some big elaborate joke, a conspiracy against me personally.

    1. Re:No sense of smell by scorp1us · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have a super sense of smell. I can smell and identify an open can of V-8 in another room. But it's not all rosey at this extreme either (pun shamefully indulged in). As a result, some of our more volatile chemicals (like tar, household cleaners, etc) cause immediate headaches at just a wiff. Today there are tons of smells that just shouldn't be there. I'm not going to equate it to a mine field, but it's not great. But on occasion it is rewarding.

      My father lost his sense of smell after a car accident. I never realized how important it is. One day his van smelled like gas, but he didn't know. He had a leaky gas line. He can't smell my mom's perfume or what's for dinner. What he does taste is a combination of the four basic flavors.

      Smell is probably our most underrated sense.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    2. Re:No sense of smell by mpeskett · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Dogs' noses are so good that they can't afford to find certain smells distasteful in the way we do - if they did it'd soon be absolutely unbearable for them anywhere near something icky.

      Our noses kinda make the decision about whether something is good/bad, for a dog any smell is just information. Like how our eyes just give us info about colours/shapes - we wouldn't recoil from a blue triangle in the way we do from sour milk.

      I suspect the smells dogs like are just the strongest smells or the ones with the most useful information to impart, which would explain the ass-sniffing and rolling in fox crap.

  5. Dumb conclusion... by TropicalCoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The finding could help explain why some pollinators, particularly bees, are declining in certain parts of the world.

    I don't need to RTFA to point out how this conclusion does not bare up to even superficial examination. We have two types of bees in this world - domestic and wild. Bees in the wild are likely far from sources of pollution - by definition of "in the wild". Domestic bees are well known to be currently suffering a crises due a disease (or is it bee mites - or both?). What bees remain that are both not "in the wild" and not domestic are the only ones to potentially fit to the above conclusion. I would suggest that this is a very small group. I suppose other pollinators - like butterflies, etc, may find it a bit more difficult to find their flowers these days, but on the other hand, one would logically find these insects near flowers in the first place - their place of birth. Same goes for domestic bees, which are cultivated near flowering crops.

  6. Re:Horse shit. by ByteSlicer · · Score: 5, Informative

    The problem seems to be not drowning the scent in other scents, but the destruction of scent molecules by pollutants. Insects have a very low scent threshold and can detect a scent trail of just a few specific molecules, so drowning wouldn't be a problem.

  7. Re:Horse shit. by ByteSlicer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Last I heard, the news reports were stating that bees weren't vanishing after all. Then they were. Then they weren't again. I heard rumors they plan to leave again right after putting a vase in every house, engraved with 'So long and thanks for all the sugar'.
  8. Re:try different flowers by T-Bone-T · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is that because you overpaid for them?

  9. Re:Coming soon - stronger scents? by dodobh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They would need to produce molecules which are not destroyed by pollutants. Being able to generate those in a really short time is tough. Even for as big a laboratory as the earth.

    --
    I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.