Slashdot Mirror


Laser Triggers Electrical Activity In Thunderstorm

esocid writes "A team of European scientists has deliberately triggered electrical activity in thunderclouds for the first time by aiming high-power pulses of laser light into a thunderstorm. At the top of South Baldy Peak in New Mexico during two passing thunderstorms, the researchers used laser pulses to create plasma filaments that could conduct electricity. No air-to-ground lightning was triggered because the filaments were too short-lived, but the laser pulses generated discharges in the thunderclouds themselves up to several meters long. Triggering lightning strikes is an important tool for basic and applied research because it enables researchers to study the mechanisms underlying lightning strikes. Moreover, triggered lightning strikes will allow engineers to evaluate and test the lightning-sensitivity of airplanes and critical infrastructure such as power lines. Research into laser-triggered lightning has been going on for some years. Until now, no experiment was able to produce a long enough plasma channel to affect the electrical activity inside clouds."

32 of 167 comments (clear)

  1. Electricity source? by billy901 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If the cost of the lasers and the energy for them didn't cost to much, it may be a possibility in the future to create energy using lightning strikes. Due to the infrequency of lightning, no one has ever made a great effort to try this. If the technology is cheap enough, this would be a great test and possibly a future energy source.

    --
    Please visit http://www.mederbil.com/ i7, GTX 275, 4 1TB Caviar Green in RAID 0+1 array, EVGA X58 3X SLI Board, Silver
    1. Re:Electricity source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And how do you control and store such power? You know, it can be really hard to stop a spark that has traveled thousands of meters just to reach the earth...

    2. Re:Electricity source? by RobertM1968 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, the other issue comes from storing that much electricity delivered in such a short period of time...

      I think the problem may be the methods being used... I would think it more logical to try to drain such energy from the sky on a slower basis than to try to capture a lightning bolt...

      But then again, I am no scientist...

    3. Re:Electricity source? by MBCook · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree with my sibling comments that this is almost certainly infeasible. Storage would be a nightmare, trying to suddenly absorb all that energy.

      However, the first thing that came to my mind was radio. Protecting antennas (especially the large ones like AM broadcast) I'd imagine is quite tough and expensive. You are going to take hits, and you have to have everything designed to deflect as much energy as possible. You obviously don't want your millions and millions of dollars of equipment getting fried. The insurance on all this can't be cheap.

      Yet if you could use a laser to drain local clouds near your antennas... you might be able to seriously mitigate possible strikes or at least the damage they might cause.

      Heck, if you could make this really cheap (obviously difficult, especially given laser power requirements) you could protect kids sports events and such that might otherwise get cancelled.

      In the midwest, sudden and STRONG thunderstorms are quite normal during parts of the year. I could see this being useful.

      Heck, synch the pulses up to the local radio station as an advertisement. "LAZR 102.7, now protecting you from lightning. Shows start when the thunder does!"

      (be afraid of NPR pledge drive week)

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    4. Re:Electricity source? by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not exactly. What the "super" in supercapacitors means is that they have extremely high capacitance and can store a large amount of charge.

      The rub is that they cannot handle much in the way of voltage. Typically in the 2 to 4 volts range depending on the type. So if you want to store a lot of voltage, you need to put them in series and that lowers the capacitance back down.

      Supercaps are not suitable for high voltage. The reason you don't see them powering electric cars instead of batteries is the voltage issue. Manufacturers and researchers are working on that but for now, the voltage a supercap can stand is very low.

    5. Re:Electricity source? by powermacx · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was hanging a clock in the bathroom while standing on the edge of the toilet when I slipped, fell and hit my head on the sink. Then I came up with this:

      ---------
      |   |   |
      |   |   |
      |  / \  |
      | /   \ |
      ---------

    6. Re:Electricity source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thank you for subscribing to the Terrorist Watch List.

      If you did not intend to suscribe please click here to unsubscribe.

    7. Re:Electricity source? by photonrider · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pants?

    8. Re:Electricity source? by evanbd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, the issue with supercaps isn't voltage, when it comes to cars. (I'll ignore catching lightning; it's a bad power source for lots of reasons.) A few in series gets into the range that power electronics can work with easily enough. No, the problem with supercaps is that they're still heavier than even lead acid batteries, and expensive. They're getting cheaper and better, though -- and last I looked into it, there were pieces of them in labs that were competitive with batteries. The best ones I've found that you can buy are about 1/10th the energy density, which is tantalizingly close.

      I'm hopeful we'll see them beginning to appear in commercial applications in a few years, though I imagine the first place they get used won't be cars. If they can compete on weight with batteries, you could imagine charging your cell phone / iPod / laptop in a tenth the time it currently takes...

    9. Re:Electricity source? by aproposofwhat · · Score: 2, Funny
      RobertM?

      Is that really you?

      There's plenty of thunder around Harare this time of year :o)

      Please stand under this tree.

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
  2. Re:Let me be the first... by mrmeval · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How cool would a "lightning bomb" be? A bit of bother dropping several thousand of them during a storm the the bewildered havoc they could wreck!

    I'm wondering if one of those microwave pseudo-EMP devices are directional enough to trigger a more massive plasma channel.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  3. I can think of no possible negative consequences.. by Theatetus · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...to shooting a laser at a big storm cloud trying to generate lightning. None whatsoever.

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted
  4. Lightning rocketry by cojsl · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A research site in Florida fires rockets trailing a wire into thunderstorms to stimulate lightning strikes: http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/rocket_lightning_030130.html Video on this page: http://skydiary.com/gallery/chase2002/2002lightmovie.html

    1. Re:Lightning rocketry by dustbin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wire not needed with a big enough rocket. See Atlas-Centaur 67 incident report. : (

  5. Lasers again. by Bovius · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sometimes I think these discoveries aren't the result of due scientific process. Sometimes I think a bunch of researchers were sitting around a break room table and said, "Let's shoot lasers at clouds!" Shooting anything with a laser to see what happens is a noble scientific endeavor.

    1. Re:Lasers again. by hardburn · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's what I told my parents when I blinded my little brother. They didn't believe me.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    2. Re:Lasers again. by jpellino · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I won't knock it - look what Adam and Jamie have managed to cook up over so many "ya know what would be cool" / "hey, do you really think you could..." discussions.

      --
      "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    3. Re:Lasers again. by hardburn · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's always important to have repeatable results.

      --
      Not a typewriter
  6. Re:Let me be the first... by RuBLed · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...to welcome our laser-wielding lightning commanding shark overlords!
    there fixed it for you
  7. Re:Let me be the first... by Sta7ic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry, I think the Greeks were doing that with Zeus. You're a few thousand years late.

  8. Re:I can think of no possible negative consequence by flaming+error · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just don't cross the beams.

  9. Weather Machine by NuclearError · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This makes me think of the storm generator in Red Alert 2. If could something even remotely like that working...

    --
    Nuclear engineers build weapons. Civil engineers build targets.
  10. Mwahahaha! by patternmatch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Triggering lightning strikes is an important tool for basic and applied research

    Don't forget supervilliany.

  11. Now we know what bored scientists do by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sounds like there could be a Darwin Award in this.

  12. I don't think that word means what you think it. . by JSBiff · · Score: 2, Informative

    . . .means. "Reverse Engineering", I think is not the right term here. I think "applications" might be a better term, possibly. That is, you can possibly apply the scientific principle that has been discovered in this experiment to technologies such as you describe - e.g. using it to shield cities/property from damage.

  13. Actually, it has been thought of and tried alot. by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem is not lack of( lightening strikes all over the planet every minute). The problem is getting it to hit in the same place over and over as well as being able to handle the amount of power that comes with it. If this can be used in areas that get lots of strikes, it may be possible to direct them to a collection spot. Btw, some good spots for collections would be mountain tops. Here in colorado, being on top a 14er in the mid-afternoon can be challenging. We actualy get a lot of fried texans and Californians each year (caused by an inability to understand that when you are above tree-line, you are the most electrically conductive item there).

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  14. Here's hoping... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

    A bunch of basement dwellers will rush outside with their mini laser lights to either get zapped by lightning or busted by the police for being terrorists when a plane flies overhead. Their sacrifices for science will be greatly appreciated by the community.

  15. Re:I can think of no possible negative consequence by jd · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's part of one of Baldrick's cunning plans. Clouds are made of water, right? And sharks swim in water. So if you kitted up the sharks with lasers...

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  16. Re:Let me be the first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    you know, somehow i think it would be more effective just aiming the damn high-power laser at your target.. but maybe that's just me.

  17. The most wonderful thing about triggers is... by greenguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...I'm the only one!

    Wait, let me read that headline again...

    --
    What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
  18. Solution to our energy woes! by Repton · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Set up giant skyward-pointing laser.
    2. Connect to mad-scientist-style lightning rod.
    3. Wait for thunderstorm.
    4. Profit!!!

    We use the lightning to drive the laser, and syphon off the excess energy into big batteries. The process is self-sustaining until the storm runs out of juice, when it ends naturally. Free electricity for us and no lightning damage to the surrounding area 'cause we're sucking down all the bolts ourselves. It's win-win!

    (of course, now all the America-hating greenies will come out of the woodwork, claiming that we're exploiting the world's natural lightning resources, and warning of grave consequences once we reach "peak storm" or other such nonsense)

    --
    Repton.
    They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
  19. If I'm not telling the truth.... by ppanon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I remember in the 80's seeing a TV show on directions in space-based weapons research for the SDI/Star Wars program. While both lasers and particle beam weapons were considered, each had their drawbacks. Lasers were subject to attenuation from clouds and atmospheric dust, whereas particle beam weapons were subject to bending from the Earth's magnetic field, as well as dispersion from electrostatic repulsion of the ions. One suggested possible approach was to use a (relatively) lower-power laser to ionize a plasma channel as a conduit for the ionized particle beam (although I expect that would only be effective in atmosphere and therefore would require a lot of LEO satellites). So laser-seeded lightning isn't a huge stretch in that direction - a bigger question would be why hasn't anybody tried it before?

    But this article got me thinking about politicians and religious fundamentalists who lie through their teeth while exclaiming "If I'm lying, may God strike me down with lightning/where I stand". A set of geosync laser platforms powerful enough to create an ionized channel between storm clouds and people who have uttered that phrase just seems long overdue.

    --
    Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire