Slashdot Mirror


Laser Triggers Electrical Activity In Thunderstorm

esocid writes "A team of European scientists has deliberately triggered electrical activity in thunderclouds for the first time by aiming high-power pulses of laser light into a thunderstorm. At the top of South Baldy Peak in New Mexico during two passing thunderstorms, the researchers used laser pulses to create plasma filaments that could conduct electricity. No air-to-ground lightning was triggered because the filaments were too short-lived, but the laser pulses generated discharges in the thunderclouds themselves up to several meters long. Triggering lightning strikes is an important tool for basic and applied research because it enables researchers to study the mechanisms underlying lightning strikes. Moreover, triggered lightning strikes will allow engineers to evaluate and test the lightning-sensitivity of airplanes and critical infrastructure such as power lines. Research into laser-triggered lightning has been going on for some years. Until now, no experiment was able to produce a long enough plasma channel to affect the electrical activity inside clouds."

121 of 167 comments (clear)

  1. Electricity source? by billy901 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If the cost of the lasers and the energy for them didn't cost to much, it may be a possibility in the future to create energy using lightning strikes. Due to the infrequency of lightning, no one has ever made a great effort to try this. If the technology is cheap enough, this would be a great test and possibly a future energy source.

    --
    Please visit http://www.mederbil.com/ i7, GTX 275, 4 1TB Caviar Green in RAID 0+1 array, EVGA X58 3X SLI Board, Silver
    1. Re:Electricity source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And how do you control and store such power? You know, it can be really hard to stop a spark that has traveled thousands of meters just to reach the earth...

    2. Re:Electricity source? by RobertM1968 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, the other issue comes from storing that much electricity delivered in such a short period of time...

      I think the problem may be the methods being used... I would think it more logical to try to drain such energy from the sky on a slower basis than to try to capture a lightning bolt...

      But then again, I am no scientist...

    3. Re:Electricity source? by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

      Very high voltage capacitors could possibly be used. With the laser technique, I would bet they could control how much energy they pulled out to some extent. Maybe not though - it is lightning.

      But if you dropped a bolt into a big, high-voltage capacitor, you could then drain it off into something else for longer storage or use. Maybe.

    4. Re:Electricity source? by hardburn · · Score: 1

      Close. Supercapacitors are getting around to making such a thing workable.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    5. Re:Electricity source? by MBCook · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree with my sibling comments that this is almost certainly infeasible. Storage would be a nightmare, trying to suddenly absorb all that energy.

      However, the first thing that came to my mind was radio. Protecting antennas (especially the large ones like AM broadcast) I'd imagine is quite tough and expensive. You are going to take hits, and you have to have everything designed to deflect as much energy as possible. You obviously don't want your millions and millions of dollars of equipment getting fried. The insurance on all this can't be cheap.

      Yet if you could use a laser to drain local clouds near your antennas... you might be able to seriously mitigate possible strikes or at least the damage they might cause.

      Heck, if you could make this really cheap (obviously difficult, especially given laser power requirements) you could protect kids sports events and such that might otherwise get cancelled.

      In the midwest, sudden and STRONG thunderstorms are quite normal during parts of the year. I could see this being useful.

      Heck, synch the pulses up to the local radio station as an advertisement. "LAZR 102.7, now protecting you from lightning. Shows start when the thunder does!"

      (be afraid of NPR pledge drive week)

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    6. Re:Electricity source? by utopianfiat · · Score: 1

      Picture this, you could spend Petawatts of energy in two seconds to have lightning strike precisely where the leader of country X is standing.
      Can you? You will.

      --
      +5, Truth
    7. Re:Electricity source? by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      precisely where the leader of country X is standing.

      Did you have a particular country in mind? :-)

      I'd rather not say what country I would have in mind - if I were so inclined, that is... which I am not... really.

    8. Re:Electricity source? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Sure, because nothing could possibly go wrong if we start wide scale deliberate tampering with thunderstorm activity.

    9. Re:Electricity source? by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not exactly. What the "super" in supercapacitors means is that they have extremely high capacitance and can store a large amount of charge.

      The rub is that they cannot handle much in the way of voltage. Typically in the 2 to 4 volts range depending on the type. So if you want to store a lot of voltage, you need to put them in series and that lowers the capacitance back down.

      Supercaps are not suitable for high voltage. The reason you don't see them powering electric cars instead of batteries is the voltage issue. Manufacturers and researchers are working on that but for now, the voltage a supercap can stand is very low.

    10. Re:Electricity source? by powermacx · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was hanging a clock in the bathroom while standing on the edge of the toilet when I slipped, fell and hit my head on the sink. Then I came up with this:

      ---------
      |   |   |
      |   |   |
      |  / \  |
      | /   \ |
      ---------

    11. Re:Electricity source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thank you for subscribing to the Terrorist Watch List.

      If you did not intend to suscribe please click here to unsubscribe.

    12. Re:Electricity source? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      You know, I thought it was bad enough that we decided to give up on having schools educate kids in favor of kids sports, but now you want mess with the weather for it too? Seriously, high school football is just not that important.

    13. Re:Electricity source? by photonrider · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pants?

    14. Re:Electricity source? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Why exactly is it necessary to directly capture the energy from lighting bolts as electricity?

      Guide the lightning into water, use the steam to spin a turbine and you've got electricity.
      Or use the heated water as a source to run a stirling engine.

      The only real obstacle is getting a hold of enough lightning to make the setup profitable.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    15. Re:Electricity source? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I would think it more logical to try to drain such energy from the sky on a slower basis

      The Amataur Scientist column in Scientific American had an article on how to run a little electric motor made with plastic disk and used a kite to get the potential difference to drive it. The article was from a back issue probably in the early 1970's - back when they had the Honeywell ads on the back of animal sculptures made from electronic components.

    16. Re:Electricity source? by paulthomas · · Score: 1

      Presumably a schematic for a leyden jar, although foil electroscope was the first thing I thought of.

    17. Re:Electricity source? by evanbd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, the issue with supercaps isn't voltage, when it comes to cars. (I'll ignore catching lightning; it's a bad power source for lots of reasons.) A few in series gets into the range that power electronics can work with easily enough. No, the problem with supercaps is that they're still heavier than even lead acid batteries, and expensive. They're getting cheaper and better, though -- and last I looked into it, there were pieces of them in labs that were competitive with batteries. The best ones I've found that you can buy are about 1/10th the energy density, which is tantalizingly close.

      I'm hopeful we'll see them beginning to appear in commercial applications in a few years, though I imagine the first place they get used won't be cars. If they can compete on weight with batteries, you could imagine charging your cell phone / iPod / laptop in a tenth the time it currently takes...

    18. Re:Electricity source? by nbritton · · Score: 1

      You can't store that kind of power. The best you can do is convert it into joule heating to boil some water to power a heat engine.

    19. Re:Electricity source? by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 1

      You would be putting in more energy than what you get out.

    20. Re:Electricity source? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      I usually just store it in the monster's brain.

      Victor Frankenstein

    21. Re:Electricity source? by lusiphur69 · · Score: 1

      You've clearly rediscovered the Flux Capacitor. The future is Back(tm).

      I tried to post this hours ago but Sorry! You last posted a comment 69 minutes ago.
      I agree with the above AC, if you cannot recognize a Flux Capacitor, you should bow your heads in shame.

    22. Re:Electricity source? by aproposofwhat · · Score: 2, Funny
      RobertM?

      Is that really you?

      There's plenty of thunder around Harare this time of year :o)

      Please stand under this tree.

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    23. Re:Electricity source? by ArAgost · · Score: 1

      ...or maybe a flux capacitor?

    24. Re:Electricity source? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      And here I was going to make a Janos Bartok and Nicodemus Legend reference. Something about upgrading from Tesla coils to lasers.

      (BTW, the merchandising links are wrong: those are the Legend (1985) movie soundtracks. A pity there's no option for correcting them.)

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    25. Re:Electricity source? by el_gordo101 · · Score: 1

      I'm hopeful we'll see them beginning to appear in commercial applications in a few years, though I imagine the first place they get used won't be cars.

      The biggest problem I see in using large capacitors in cars is when you get into an accident. I wouldn't want to be the fireman cutting the car open with the jaws of life that accidentally discharges the cap.
      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
  2. Re:Let me be the first... by mrmeval · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How cool would a "lightning bomb" be? A bit of bother dropping several thousand of them during a storm the the bewildered havoc they could wreck!

    I'm wondering if one of those microwave pseudo-EMP devices are directional enough to trigger a more massive plasma channel.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  3. I can think of no possible negative consequences.. by Theatetus · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...to shooting a laser at a big storm cloud trying to generate lightning. None whatsoever.

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted
  4. Lightning rocketry by cojsl · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A research site in Florida fires rockets trailing a wire into thunderstorms to stimulate lightning strikes: http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/rocket_lightning_030130.html Video on this page: http://skydiary.com/gallery/chase2002/2002lightmovie.html

    1. Re:Lightning rocketry by dustbin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wire not needed with a big enough rocket. See Atlas-Centaur 67 incident report. : (

    2. Re:Lightning rocketry by grumling · · Score: 1

      See also: Apollo 12.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  5. A Laser pointer and a Hybrid car by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    OK, you may need more electricity to drive the laser than one can get from a discharge, but how about harvesting the clouds?

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  6. Just be careful... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    Because the plasma channels were too short, the electrical discharge was only able to travel a few meters before dissipating. The team believes that, by increasing the laser pulses by a factor of 10, they would be able to create longer plasma channels, in order to trigger air-to-ground electrical discharges.

    Just be sure you surround the laser with some sort of Faraday cage...we'd hate to see your experiment succeed...only to lose your expensive high-power laser to a lightning strike... ^_^
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Just be careful... by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

      I would think you could use a grounded turning mirror and/or a grounded aperture to shoot through.

      You could also use a beam expander and condenser over a distance to lower the power density such that you didn't make a conducting channel that would provide an electrical disconnect.

      Still, this is very cool stuff!

  7. How does this compare to owning the hammer of Thor by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

    As cool as that would be, I'd rather have Mjolnir and use that to control the storms...

    Just a thought...

    Though I didnt write this list (I DO have more of a life than that!), I thought it cool...

    http://www.aibuiltpc.com/THOR_and_Mjolnir.html

  8. Forget Frickin' Sharks... by blcamp · · Score: 1


    Just go fly a kite... and don't forget your keys!

    --
    The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
  9. Lasers again. by Bovius · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sometimes I think these discoveries aren't the result of due scientific process. Sometimes I think a bunch of researchers were sitting around a break room table and said, "Let's shoot lasers at clouds!" Shooting anything with a laser to see what happens is a noble scientific endeavor.

    1. Re:Lasers again. by hardburn · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's what I told my parents when I blinded my little brother. They didn't believe me.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    2. Re:Lasers again. by jpellino · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I won't knock it - look what Adam and Jamie have managed to cook up over so many "ya know what would be cool" / "hey, do you really think you could..." discussions.

      --
      "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    3. Re:Lasers again. by hardburn · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's always important to have repeatable results.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    4. Re:Lasers again. by Nephrite · · Score: 1

      I don't get you sarcasm. If I ever got my paws on a gigawatt laser I'd firts shoot some stuff with it just to see what happens. Remember what science is? It's bating one's curiosity for someone else's money.

    5. Re:Lasers again. by EMeta · · Score: 1

      "Mom, I need more brothers..."

  10. Mad science at its best. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1
    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  11. Seems simple enough.. by MadMorf · · Score: 1

    ...make a lower resistance path between cloud and ground...

    Either with a wire on a rocket or a lower density column of heated air...

    So, that lowers the threshold of charge differential required for the discharge.

    1. Re:Seems simple enough.. by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      They've been using the "wire on a rocket" scenario in Florida for quite some time to "experiment" with lightning...

      Dunno what they learned from it, or what they are doing now... just know I saw it on some science special (Discovery Channel, or Weather Channel or someplace like that).

  12. Reverse Engineering? by billy901 · · Score: 1

    After reading this article, and doing a little research, I discovered some facts proving that with a little hard work and a little development, they may be able to reverse engineer technology like this to extract energy from storms. This would be useful for to stop lightning from hitting major cities. Some places uses planes to drop a gas into storm clouds to stop storms, it is very risky, but also makes tornadoes a little more mild, believe it or not.

    --
    Please visit http://www.mederbil.com/ i7, GTX 275, 4 1TB Caviar Green in RAID 0+1 array, EVGA X58 3X SLI Board, Silver
  13. Sharks? by ruiner13 · · Score: 1, Funny

    How did they get the sharks with the friggin' laser beams into the clouds?

    --

    today is spelling optional day.

    1. Re:Sharks? by owlnation · · Score: 1

      easy, flying sharks!

    2. Re:Sharks? by xstonedogx · · Score: 1

      Well, sharks can't breath in the atmosphere, so they'd also have to be zombies.

      Is there anything cooler or more deadly than lightning-generating flying zombie sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads?

  14. Re:Let me be the first... by RuBLed · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...to welcome our laser-wielding lightning commanding shark overlords!
    there fixed it for you
  15. Re:Let me be the first... by Sta7ic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry, I think the Greeks were doing that with Zeus. You're a few thousand years late.

  16. All just... by heyetv · · Score: 1

    a new tool for America's War on Drugs!

    Yeah, I don't listen to me either.

  17. Been There Done That by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    There are simpler ways. Ben Franklin used a kite to good effect. Long metal poles in the middle of a field also work.

    1. Re:Been There Done That by grumling · · Score: 1

      And Mr. Franklin was nearly excommunicated for messing around with the "natural order" of things. It was God's will that your house was struck by lightning. Perhaps you could have been a little more sincere in your prayers?

      I think I'll let lightning do whatever God wants and keep my soul in good shape. Thanks just the same.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  18. Re:I can think of no possible negative consequence by flaming+error · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just don't cross the beams.

  19. Weather Machine by NuclearError · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This makes me think of the storm generator in Red Alert 2. If could something even remotely like that working...

    --
    Nuclear engineers build weapons. Civil engineers build targets.
  20. Mwahahaha! by patternmatch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Triggering lightning strikes is an important tool for basic and applied research

    Don't forget supervilliany.

    1. Re:Mwahahaha! by mateomiguel · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean supervillainry?

  21. Now we know what bored scientists do by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sounds like there could be a Darwin Award in this.

  22. Oh no... by LeoDavinci578 · · Score: 1

    Better hope this technology doesn't make its way to Redmond, if it does we will have a lot more than flying chairs to worry about...

  23. Comic books by WarJolt · · Score: 1

    I'm still waiting for the television broadcast on every channel to say the mad scientist is holding the world hostage.

    1. Re:Comic books by NCG_Mike · · Score: 1

      I'm busy at the moment...

  24. I don't think that word means what you think it. . by JSBiff · · Score: 2, Informative

    . . .means. "Reverse Engineering", I think is not the right term here. I think "applications" might be a better term, possibly. That is, you can possibly apply the scientific principle that has been discovered in this experiment to technologies such as you describe - e.g. using it to shield cities/property from damage.

  25. Actually, it has been thought of and tried alot. by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem is not lack of( lightening strikes all over the planet every minute). The problem is getting it to hit in the same place over and over as well as being able to handle the amount of power that comes with it. If this can be used in areas that get lots of strikes, it may be possible to direct them to a collection spot. Btw, some good spots for collections would be mountain tops. Here in colorado, being on top a 14er in the mid-afternoon can be challenging. We actualy get a lot of fried texans and Californians each year (caused by an inability to understand that when you are above tree-line, you are the most electrically conductive item there).

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  26. Here's hoping... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

    A bunch of basement dwellers will rush outside with their mini laser lights to either get zapped by lightning or busted by the police for being terrorists when a plane flies overhead. Their sacrifices for science will be greatly appreciated by the community.

    1. Re:Here's hoping... by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

      Their sacrifices for science will be greatly appreciated by the community.

      And they all will be honored with Darwin award.

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
  27. Coincidence ? by s0m3body · · Score: 1

    First 'Run Google App Engine Apps On Amazon's Cloud'.

    Now European scientists are shooting the sky with their laser producing long enough plasma channel to affect the electrical activity inside clouds.

    DOS attacks ?

  28. Hmmmmm..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    I remember watching a video about a guy who shot homemade rockets, trainling a long thin wire, into thunderclouds. Pretty cool.

    Apparently, the exhaust and the wire both triggered lightning strikes that traveled down the wire and/or exhaust plume to the ground.

    Pretty neat.

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  29. Harness Lightning by fltsimbuff · · Score: 1

    This could go a long way towards allowing us to harness the power of lightning! We could build lightning farms in areas where lightning often forms, and find a way to store the power.

  30. COBRA! by worst_name_ever · · Score: 1

    It looks like Destro has finally succeeded in getting the Weather Dominator online...

    --

    In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
    1. Re:COBRA! by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

      Harnessing the power from lightening is a great idea until you look at the logistics. To give you an idea its a bit like connecting a huge magical nuclear power plant to the grid that appears at random for 5-10 minutes and never at the spot.

  31. Re:I can think of no possible negative consequence by jd · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's part of one of Baldrick's cunning plans. Clouds are made of water, right? And sharks swim in water. So if you kitted up the sharks with lasers...

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  32. Re:Let me be the first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    you know, somehow i think it would be more effective just aiming the damn high-power laser at your target.. but maybe that's just me.

  33. Anyone else been to the top of that mountain? by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 1

    If I'm not mistaken that mountain is in the Philmont Scout Reservation. Surely there must be other slashdotters that have climbed it. Yes?

    --
    Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    1. Re:Anyone else been to the top of that mountain? by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 1

      After more research, I've decided this is not the same South Baldy Peak in New Mexico. Never mind.

      --
      Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    2. Re:Anyone else been to the top of that mountain? by Flying+Scotsman · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing, and then double checked. OT: But yes, my Philmot expedition in 2002 had Baldy as a turn-around point (it was the northern most point of our trek). We got to stay in Baldy camp two consecutive nights, which meant we could go up baldy with just day packs. The group we passed on the way up Baldy was lugging all their gear with them, and didn't seem to be enjoying the ascent as much as we were.

  34. Power Grid by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

    Most people don't realise that electrical storms cost "billions" of dollars to electrical suppliers with (nuclear) plants going of line to transformers being damaged or destroyed. The first I heard about this type of research of using lasers to redirect and control electrical discharge was in the early 90's (in Japan). If you want big $$$ funding and you like big $$$ lasers this is a great research area for that.

  35. Re:I can think of no possible negative consequence by Jurily · · Score: 1

    They still need sharks, just to be on the safe side.

  36. The most wonderful thing about triggers is... by greenguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...I'm the only one!

    Wait, let me read that headline again...

    --
    What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
  37. Re:If You Have to Trigger It by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

    For one thing, it might be straight bolts instead of zig-zag. How cool is that? Lightning that looks like a big bright fluorescent tube.

  38. Re:Let me be the first... by nizo · · Score: 1

    Just make sure there aren't any thunderclouds between you and your target.

  39. The real scientist behind all this... by milbournosphere · · Score: 1

    At last, Pinky, my plan to take over the world is complete. Surely no one will be able to stop our storm controlling lasers now....
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=iJPFSNu_QNs

    1. Re:The real scientist behind all this... by temojen · · Score: 1

      Erm, Brain was the insane one; Pinky was the genius who consistently foiled the villain's plans.

  40. Yes, but by proxy318 · · Score: 1

    were they able to generate 1.21 jiggawatts?

    --
    Saying your "phone ran out of batteries" is like saying your "car ran out of gas tanks".
  41. Perpetual Laser Machine? by ittybad · · Score: 1

    Sooooo.... Can you fire a laser, capture the ensuing lightning, use that energy to re-power the laser (with some energy to spare), repeat?

    --
    No single raindrop believes it is to blame for the flood.
  42. Re:I can think of no possible negative consequence by khallow · · Score: 1

    Negative... positive... it's all just signs.

  43. Actually, it think that it is possible by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Look, at this time, there is little chance of CAPTURING ALL of the energy with today's technology (from what little I know). But providing a break water is very different mater. We have the ability to handle all the energy, just not the storage. So, we simply run it into resisters, and lose some of the energy as heat. Heck with recent idea of a new thermoelectric generator, it might be possible to not have to just dump all the energy.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  44. Solution to our energy woes! by Repton · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Set up giant skyward-pointing laser.
    2. Connect to mad-scientist-style lightning rod.
    3. Wait for thunderstorm.
    4. Profit!!!

    We use the lightning to drive the laser, and syphon off the excess energy into big batteries. The process is self-sustaining until the storm runs out of juice, when it ends naturally. Free electricity for us and no lightning damage to the surrounding area 'cause we're sucking down all the bolts ourselves. It's win-win!

    (of course, now all the America-hating greenies will come out of the woodwork, claiming that we're exploiting the world's natural lightning resources, and warning of grave consequences once we reach "peak storm" or other such nonsense)

    --
    Repton.
    They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
  45. If I'm not telling the truth.... by ppanon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I remember in the 80's seeing a TV show on directions in space-based weapons research for the SDI/Star Wars program. While both lasers and particle beam weapons were considered, each had their drawbacks. Lasers were subject to attenuation from clouds and atmospheric dust, whereas particle beam weapons were subject to bending from the Earth's magnetic field, as well as dispersion from electrostatic repulsion of the ions. One suggested possible approach was to use a (relatively) lower-power laser to ionize a plasma channel as a conduit for the ionized particle beam (although I expect that would only be effective in atmosphere and therefore would require a lot of LEO satellites). So laser-seeded lightning isn't a huge stretch in that direction - a bigger question would be why hasn't anybody tried it before?

    But this article got me thinking about politicians and religious fundamentalists who lie through their teeth while exclaiming "If I'm lying, may God strike me down with lightning/where I stand". A set of geosync laser platforms powerful enough to create an ionized channel between storm clouds and people who have uttered that phrase just seems long overdue.

    --
    Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  46. Followed by... by epee1221 · · Score: 1

    Scientist: Hmm... I wonder if it does that every time?

    --
    "The use-mention distinction" is not "enforced here."
  47. Re:If You Have to Trigger It by Tehrasha · · Score: 1

    I cant remember what magazine it was in., but I -think- it was Popular Science... About 12 years ago had a nice picture of a cloud to ground strike initiated by laser. Clouds, crinkly bit, long straight diagonal line, crinkly bit, ground. Downright creepy looking.

  48. Don't take the direct approach... by LamboAlpha · · Score: 1

    I was thinking that a more indirect method for collecting the energy would be easier. If you caused an air-ground strike, why not try collecting energy from the induced magnetic field. I would assume the lightning strike is very close to the ground based laser. The collection system would be setup around that point. I know the field would not long (but without a moving coil, the changing field is required to in induce current in the collection coils) nor would it be an efficient method (not really sure how bad). But it has the advantage that a majority of the system would never come in direct contact with the lighting strike.

  49. thunder storm barbecue by zakeria · · Score: 1

    so who will do it first?

  50. No, it'd have to be your bull by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 1

    An OCD child drawing a peace-sign?

  51. Re:Let me be the first... by poopdeville · · Score: 1

    One Piece already did it, during the Skypeia arc. Zoro punched one.

    --
    After all, I am strangely colored.
  52. Re:I can think of no possible negative consequence by poopdeville · · Score: 1

    No known Baldrick would have known clouds are made of water.

    --
    After all, I am strangely colored.
  53. Not enough energy by turing_m · · Score: 1

    The reason this hasn't been tried commercially is that there aren't commercial quantities of energy available. A bit of googling yields a figure of 250kWh per strike, or less than my personal energy bill for a quarter. It's a bit like shuffling your shoes on the floor to generate static electricity - most of the energy goes towards heating up your shoes, not transfering electrons.

    --
    If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  54. Re:Let me be the first... by davolfman · · Score: 1

    Well, if you shoot from orbit you can do both!

  55. Laser discharge filament creation by twomanyhats · · Score: 1

    As with many things being studied in academia there is already a company that does this. http://www.appliedenergetics.com/ Why wait for storm clouds?

  56. Re:Let me be the first... by LS · · Score: 1

    I know you are joking but I suspect the power stored in static electricity within the atmosphere is far more than what can be easily deployed with a laser. Think of it as setting off an snow avalanche with a small explosion.

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  57. Power! by ross.w · · Score: 1

    Unlimited power!!!!!

    --
    If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  58. Lightning-Powered Cash Cow by spudwiser · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this could be used as a form of advertising.

    --
    .cig - what you do after winning a good flame war
  59. Methinks by Sethus · · Score: 1

    Some scientists played too much Red Alert in college.

    --
    Posting with out proof reading since 2001.
  60. This should end well! by liftphreaker · · Score: 1

    Fricking lasers blasted at fricking high powered electrical storms that would fry your ass even on ordinary days? This should end well. :o

  61. Re:Let me be the first... by Stripe7 · · Score: 1

    I would be more curious about the strength of the laser beam. If it is strong enough to create a conductive channel but not require a heavy amount of power to generate, it could make for an interesting weapon. Use the laser to create a channel in the air and run a current through it from the laser weapon. Sort of a Tazer that uses a laser to create a path in the air to the target. I believe this is in the works somewhere.

  62. Academic Nostalgia by Benson+Arizona · · Score: 1

    Having left the academic world for the commercial sector, the parties are the thing that I miss the most. The bean counters don't seem to have any concept of livening-up the office party by say, making lightening by shooting lasers at clouds. They think that we should be happy with traditional party games like photocopying our genitals. Where's the fun in that?

    Of course, that was just a prototype. Wait till you see the "real thing" at the Who's come-back tour of the US (we don't need lasers to make thunderstorms in the UK).

  63. Re:Let me be the first... by redxxx · · Score: 1

    How the hell is that plausibly deniable?

  64. Deliberately, eh? by Snaller · · Score: 1

    "A team of European scientists has deliberately triggered electrical activity in thunderclouds"

    As opposed to all those times they did it by mistake, eh?

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  65. Re:Actually, it has been thought of and tried alot by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Acutally, we get about 10 hits a year, with 2-3 deaths. We are one of the worse states for hits. In fact, given our size and population density, we are probably the worse state for lightening. Only Florida has more deaths (roughly double) and they have many time bigger population. We are 5 million and they are about 20 million. They should have about 3-4x our strikes.

    And texans/californians account for about 20% of these. Now that does not sound like much, until you realize that a Coloradoans account for the majority of exposure. We probably account for about 90-95% of the exposure. Yet the texans/californians are hit as high as they are. It is disproportionate BECAUSE they are not thinking. They just assume that things are safe. After all, lightening is not a real issue in either of their states. It is because of this, that a number of CO emergency rooms are pushing that information on all of the information boards for tourists.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  66. South Baldy Peak? by peipas · · Score: 1

    Somebody's a fan of pubic lawn care.

  67. Great weapon for the G.S.w.A.F.? by John+Guilt · · Score: 1

    As far as I'm concerned, the real "war" is the Global Struggle with Armed Fundamentalism. (Note: "ism", not "ists"---though if we're not careful we'll obviously screw up and eliminate the distinction.)

    Imagine bringing to bear something that looks like classic Divine Intervention against them...unfortunately, technology can be used by people who are bright enough, regardless of whatever else they might believe, so you'd soon have the government of the Eternal and Universal Caliphate* using it to impress its subjects....

    *That is, "Pashtunistan, for about twenty to seventy years." Neighbour to Beluchistan, Kashmir, and Greater Iran.

  68. The weather dominator is almost complete! by mindmaster064 · · Score: 1

    All hail our new Cobra Commander overlord! COBRA-LALALALALA!

  69. Beijing 2008 by CaligarisDesk · · Score: 1

    I hear China is looking to add air to ground capability to this technology before August. They are planning to use it to light the Olympic torch.

  70. At a concert near you.... by rustcycle · · Score: 1

    Time to upgrade my band's lighting / strobe rig ;-D

    --
    Music for coding. Genetic algorithm driven visuals. http://www
  71. Re:Let me be the first... by ihatethetv · · Score: 1

    "You just don't get it, do you Scott?"

  72. Re:Let me be the first... by Manty01Actual · · Score: 1

    My thoughts exactly, and I guarantee you they're doing feasability studies right now out at Groom Lake. -- "Don't be ridiculous! I have no interest whatsoever in taking over the world! Just a corner of the solar system would be fine..."

    --
    I am no longer interested in taking over the world, I just want a modest corner of the Solar System
  73. Re:Let me be the first... by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    Name that scifi story! A 'dark planet' or 'rogue planet' is near enough for humans to visit and when the plucky girl recklessly sets foot on it all the electrostatic forces stored up on it are unleashed.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  74. Re:Let me be the first... by SpinyManiac · · Score: 1
    --
    It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
  75. Positive by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Of course not, lightning makes ozone, O3+.

    Come to think of it, shoot lasers at those big thunderstorms in Australia and close up the ozone hole... power them with that giant tower thing they were talking about.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  76. Re:Let me be the first... by CommanderIsm · · Score: 1

    Durr... been there done that ... TESLA - meanwhile a vegan diet is a must for fat american's

  77. Re:Let me be the first... by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    A friend asked an immigrant why they come to America.

    "Your poor people are fat."

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty