Slashdot Mirror


Walter Bender Resigns From OLPC

westlake writes "Walter Bender, the former executive director of MIT's Media Lab, and, in many ways, the tireless workhorse and public face of OLPC, has resigned from OLPC after being reorganized and sidetracked into insignificance. The rumor mill would have it that 'constructionism as children [learn] learning' is being replaced by a much less romantic view of the XO's place in the classroom and XO's tech in the marketplace."

126 comments

  1. oblig by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did his final words as he left have anything to do with biting his shiny metal ass?

    1. Re:oblig by thhamm · · Score: 5, Funny

      with biting his shiny metal ass?

      nah, but: 'i'll make my own OLPC ... with blackjack ... and hookers.'

    2. Re:oblig by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Did his final words as he left have anything to do with biting his shiny metal ass?


      Yes. I believe he said something like, "What the HELL are you doing? Stop that right now you freak, or I'm leaving."
    3. Re:oblig by cephah · · Score: 3, Funny

      nah, but: 'i'll make my own OLPC ... with blackjack ... and hookers.' In fact forget the OLPC, and the blackjack.
    4. Re:oblig by everphilski · · Score: 4, Funny

      antiquing?

    5. Re:oblig by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      Did he go "quick and painless," or "slow and horrible"?

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    6. Re:oblig by Kid+Moxie · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Did his final words as he left have anything to do with biting his shiny metal ass? Oh, no room for Bender, huh? Fine! I'll go build my own laptop, with blackjack... and hookers! In fact, forget the laptop and the blackjack!
    7. Re:oblig by stuntpope · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You know, I clicked the story link solely to check just how far down in comments a line like that would be. And there it is at the top! Bravo.

  2. No, nor XP. by gnutoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Walter Bender has finally spoken on his resignation from One Laptop Per Child. In an email to me, he says he doesn't know about any plans for Windows XP on the XO laptop, so my fears of a Microsoft take-over of OLPC may be unfounded.

    Summary and original speculation were complete BS.

    To keep in the spirit of the thread, XP smells worse than your shiny metal ass.

    1. Re:No, nor XP. by willyhill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This would merit the moderation if not for the fact that this account is one of your seven sockpuppets. You even created one so you could insult me.

      --
      The twitter monologues. Click on my homepage and be amazed.
    2. Re:No, nor XP. by turtledawn · · Score: 1

      Last I checked this still wasn't wikipedia (thank $god), so really, who cares?

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    3. Re:No, nor XP. by dedazo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      so really, who cares?

      If you were engaged in a discussion with a person and suddenly six others showed up to shill and agree with the original one, how would you like that? More importantly, he knows very well what that kind of activity looks like to moderators - seven people carrying on a "conversation" with each other in opposition to you is usually a recipe for being modded down (and get him karma in the process).

      I don't know about you, but I have a single Slashdot account and I'd like to think I'm responsible for my own opinion being modded up or down. twitter went to karma hell because the Slashdot community got tired of his bullshit. He can't have that, so instead he blames it on a vast conspiracy by Microsoft and creates seven different accounts, as opposed to actually correcting the problems that got him in the hole to begin with.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  3. Instead OLPC should deepen its approch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Teach children how to learn to learn learning.

    1. Re:Instead OLPC should deepen its approch by sm62704 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But first you have to learn the teachers how to teach to teach teaching.

      My brain hurts.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    2. Re:Instead OLPC should deepen its approch by menace3society · · Score: 1

      No, what you must do is put unqualified idealists in teaching positions and call it experimental. When it works, you get the credit, and when it fails, the teachers take the blame.

  4. romantic? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From a business standpoint, less romanticism is a GOOD thing.

    1. Re:romantic? WTF? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From a romantic standpoint, less business is a GOOD thing.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    2. Re:romantic? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, right up until everyone starves to death because nobody is doing any business.

    3. Re:romantic? WTF? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not if your customer is the governor of NY.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    4. Re:romantic? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, everyone starved to death prior to the advent of business.

    5. Re:romantic? WTF? by markov_chain · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Maybe not everyone, but many did. We're talking pre-farming, which would count as business. Even then I bet there were "businessmen" who could survive even while doing less actual hunting or gathering than would normally sustain an individual.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
  5. Why am I getting a strange feeling... by tgatliff · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That now that OLPC is no longer a threat that all of the other vendors of small low cost laptops will simply stop offering them... Just a thought... :)

    1. Re:Why am I getting a strange feeling... by Achoi77 · · Score: 1

      Why? Manufacturers will just remodel it and brand it was as some kind of supplementary device to sell alongside their regular line of laptops, kinda like (incoming obligatory car analogy) subcompact cars geared towards first-time buyers or people that just want something to carry around that's not nearly as costly as compared to their more expensive luxury car/suv brethren. Plus, it gives them a chance to refine the tech to aim for more battery efficiency, and may possibly see it all trickle over to their midline set of products. And if they can do it before their competitors do, then that will be advantageous to them in the longer run. Simply shutting down operations and ignoring a potential market is foolish.

    2. Re:Why am I getting a strange feeling... by Orange+Crush · · Score: 1

      Why would they do that if selling them is profitable? It's not like many of the customers buying sub-$300 tiny laptops are gonna happily buy something double the size and double the price.

    3. Re:Why am I getting a strange feeling... by couchslug · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That now that OLPC is no longer a threat that all of the other vendors of small low cost laptops will simply stop offering them... Just a thought... :) Asus is doing very well with its flagship offering.
      The people who don't get it right may stop offering small lappies, but at last there is a small, uncrippled (unlike I-Openers etc) flash drive computer in a very convenient form-factor.
      OLPC may die out, but their business model isn't our problem. Asus proved that running a real desktop OS in that package is what consumers want as opposed to deliberately crippled equipment running crippled operating systems. Crippling gives "product differentiation", but it still leaves a gap. Asus just exploited that gap.
      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    4. Re:Why am I getting a strange feeling... by tgatliff · · Score: 1

      I think allot of this depends on the margins.. Meaning, on the low end, the vendor is forced to try to go for volume at the expense of individual product margins. Dell can tell you first hand the long-term effects of this...

      The key is how much competition exists in this space. If Asus can make money after their support and managing costs are figured it, then they might keep it around. A problem that many businesses are having in the advanced industrial nations, however, is that the cost of business overhead really is becoming a problem.

      I guess time will only tell... :)

    5. Re:Why am I getting a strange feeling... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "I think allot of this depends on the margins.. Meaning, on the low end, the vendor is forced to try to go for volume at the expense of individual product margins."

      Asus could do massive volume of each design by keeping it available and gradually dropping the price. Upscaling features and prices is normal enough, but the tooling for the first versions is paid for. They could keep spitting them out and secure the market by flooding it.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    6. Re:Why am I getting a strange feeling... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      OLPC may die out, but their business model isn't our problem. Asus proved that running a real desktop OS in that package is what consumers want as opposed to deliberately crippled equipment running crippled operating systems.

      If you think that the OLPC is "Crippled" or that its OS is crippled, then you obviously don't understand the system.

      The OLPC uses far less power than any "competitor" (the OLPC is not competing with them, by design) and NO other machine that I know of has the same type of networking subsystem which is a mesh-networking AP, not just a WiFi NIC. No other machine has a screen that does what the XO's screen does, either.

      Try again when you understand what the machine is for.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Why am I getting a strange feeling... by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

      OLPC may die out, but their business model isn't our problem.

      That assumes that it is a for-profit operation. But it isn't, it is an attempt to give third world children better tools for learning.

      Asus proved that running a real desktop OS in that package is what consumers want as opposed to deliberately crippled equipment running crippled operating systems.

      OLPC isn't aimed at first world consumers and what they want, it is designed to be (among other things) extremely robust and power efficient.

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

  6. Re:GOOD... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Yah, yah.

    1: Wait till it all falls apart.
    2: Buy them up by the container load.
    3: Spray the case a reasonable colour.
    4: Reflash the OS to something businesses can use.
    5: Profit!

    There you go. Filled in all of the steps for you.

    --
    Deleted
  7. Sadly, no... by nweaver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The software stack may be questionable, but the hardware is brilliant.

    Nothing else comes close for efficiency, cost, battery life (with working software), ruggedness, total lifetime, etc.

    The thing is VERY tough (i've tossed mine several times), very low power (3 hours battery life with 100% broken power management. Good power management should get 6+ hours battery life for typical users), with a brilliant screen. Just put real software on it and its very nice.

    Let alone the environmental tolerance: Normal notebook batteries die if you try charging them at 100F.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:Sadly, no... by renoX · · Score: 1

      >The software stack may be questionable, but the hardware is brilliant.

      Agreed but the problem is that the OLPC will be much more useful to children when the software and documents will be ready, for example having good e-manuals on their native language available on the local server.

      And this will take many years to have..

    2. Re:Sadly, no... by cryingpoet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The software stack may be questionable, but the hardware is brilliant. The external hardware is durable and well placed, but the overall system is anything but brilliant. There is no reason to use an x86 processor for the project. This should be treated as an embedded design.

      To further reduce costs and increase battery life a RISC based processor should be used. Suitable ARM based System-On-Chip (SOC) processors run up to 800 MHz, thus reducing power consumption and increasing performance. Nvidia, ATI, and other companies make graphics accelerators that are more than sufficient to meet the video conferencing needs. The systems has an 800 x 600 display and uses NAND Flash memory with no hard drive, it should be thought of as an embedded product.

      The XO laptop uses Nickel-Cadmium battery rather than a Lithium-Ion. The intended use case is for students who will only have power part of the day if at all. An Nickel-Cadmium battery is not suitable for this many recharge cycles. The hardware is NOT brilliant.

    3. Re:Sadly, no... by legutierr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The software stack may be questionable, but the hardware is brilliant. The software stack is actually very cool and innovative. Unfortunately, it is also way too ambitious for the distribution timeline that OLPC has. It tries to reinvent the filesystem and all the standard WIMP GUI conventions, even while implementing everything in *Python*. On top of that, almost every element of the software stack (browser, word processor, etc.) is either implemented from scratch, or re-implemented in Python on top of a low-level branch of FOSS code like gecko or AbiWord.

      Sugar is a worthwhile project. Unfortunately, it is not yet stable (memory leaks, etc), the kinks of the completely re-imagined user experience have not been worked out, and not every "activity" that is needed to provide a complete user experience exists.

      I hope that Sugar is not dead, because when that thing actually starts working...(famous last words?) More importantly, I hope that OLPC makes some very clear and unambiguous statements regarding the future and the status of Sugar, because it needs a strong developer community to survive, and I sure as hell am not going to write anything for it if it is completely abandoned. What a waste it would be, after so much good work.
    4. Re:Sadly, no... by Rorschach1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was reasonably impressed with the hardware. Had to cram some folded paper into the battery compartment to stop the rattling, but other than that the construction seemed solid. The keyboard is mushy, though, and probably the most annoying I've used since the Timex Sinclair 1000.

      I've had the touch pad start freaking out in odd ways, with the pointer randomly jumping when I lift my finger to reposition it.

      The screen is very impressive, especially for the cost. The camera is surprisingly good. The software is, IMHO, a steaming pile of crap in its current state, wholly unsuitable for its target audience. It's slow to load, simple operations like exiting programs are inconsistent between applications, and there seems to be little to no built-in help.

      Both of my kids (ages 9 and 12) gave up on using it. My daughter (the 9-year-old) much prefers her old Gateway P2-550 laptop running Windows 2000, despite the machine being an ancient cast-off that ceased being a useful business computer several years ago. Firefox on that machine is vastly superior to the XO-1's browser, and the overall experience is much less frustrating.

      Despite my doubts about the OLPC project from the beginning, I've WANTED it to succeed, and I still hope to see it succeed. I want to believe that the open source community can build something that will make a real difference in the developing world, but it looks like there's still a long way to go.

    5. Re:Sadly, no... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Why is software stack questionable? Beyond the conventional "it's not a standard platform", that is?

    6. Re:Sadly, no... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is no reason to use an x86 processor for the project.

      Okay. Is there any reason NOT to use an x86 CPU? There are some great low-power "embedded" CPU solutions out there, but is it accurate to say x86-based CPUs do not and cannot meet those criteria?

      The systems has an 800 x 600 display

      It's actually 1200x900. I'm not sure where you got your numbers from.

      I wonder what else about the device you might be misinformed about?

    7. Re:Sadly, no... by Locutus · · Score: 1

      please remember that your kids( ages 9 and 12 ) are not 3rd work kids and as you stated, they have already been indoctrinated into the way Microsoft feels a generic user interface should be. Also, your kids Gateway computer is not being used in a teaching environment with a curriculum designed around learning. All of these are far far off from what the design of the XO and Sugar are about.

      And yes, Sugar is not quite there yet but come on, it has taken Microsoft over 10 years to get there little Windows CE/Windows Mobile operating system and UI to a point where it is just about usable. Ten years and they have over $10 billion in losses just in that one little software kit. Sugar is very very close to where it needs to be and already at a point where it is usable for some learning activities. Look up some of the deployment and pilot articles being written and you'll see there is already useful learning going on. Sugar hides alot of the goofiness general purpose desktop UI's have and don't even get me started about the filesystem. Just look at all the changing ways there are to not only create application data but also getting back to it. Sugar simplifies this by putting it into the Journal in time/date order. Just like you would want if the goal was to use the device for assignments which must be finished and turned in for grading and then mostly discarded.

      You are making the incorrect assumption that the XO is supposed to be like a normal computer and it is not. It is too bad but way too many think the way you do and the whole project is getting a bad rep because of this misinformation. IMO.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    8. Re:Sadly, no... by glug101 · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more about the hardware. If anybody that reads this can point me to a laptop that meets the following criteria, I would likely buy it tomorrow.

      1. Costs less than $200
      2. Uses little enough electricity that it could be powered by a person. (Like the power yo-yo developed for the OLPC)
      3. Can be used in the rain.
      4. Folds into a tablet like handheld display.
      5. Can survive being hauled to school by children in a 3rd world nation.

      I don't think you can find laptop hardware with the capabilities of the OLPC in the private sector for 2x the price. Come to think of it, the give 1 get 1 was actually a good deal. I wish I would have had $400 to take advantage of it.

    9. Re:Sadly, no... by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      The touchpad can be reset by hitting the keys in the four corners of the keyboard. My 8 year old is still using and enjoying her OLPC. But maybe that's because she's never had a castoff laptop to compare it with. I've been debating whether to drop sugar and replace it with xfce for the reasons you cite.

    10. Re:Sadly, no... by jc42 · · Score: 1

      The systems has an 800 x 600 display
      It's actually 1200x900. I'm not sure where you got your numbers from.

      And that's only about 1% different from the screen on the Mac Powerbook that I'm typing this on. So both should be able to display about the same amount of info, right?

      On this PB, I have four 90x30 non-overlapping Terminal windows open, with three of them ssh'd to other machines that I'm working on. With the XO, as far as I can tell, I can only get one terminal window at a time, and it's fewer chars than 90x30 (though I don't offhand remember its actual size).

      This seriously restricts its use for a lot of things that you'd think the kids would want to do. It's really hard to develop python (or any OO) code in a single window. In OO languages, the info you need to work on code is distributed widely inside different modules, and the only time-efficient way to work on such code is with multiple text (or editor) windows. Yeah, you can do it in one window, but it's slow and frustrating.

      It seems clear that part of the intent of the OLPC project is a laptop that can teach kids about computers. This is the main reason for insisting on open-source everything. The kids should be able to study the code and develop their own code. But the Sugar UI seriously cripples this task by restricting what's visible to only one "window" at a time. This isn't necessitated by the small screen; the screen has a lot of pixels and most of those kids have good eyes.

      I'd be happy with a UI on the XO that shows me my four terminal windows with chars 1/2 the height and width as on this Mac, because I'd be able to read them without problems (and I'm over 50 ;-). And I'd be able to use it to get serious work (and learning) done. Maybe I should look into running a real OS (like linux or free/openBSD) on it, and running Sugar as a process that talks to X-Windows. I wonder how I'd learn to do that?

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    11. Re:Sadly, no... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      please remember that your kids( ages 9 and 12 ) are not 3rd work kids and as you stated, they have already been indoctrinated into the way Microsoft feels a generic user interface should be. Actually my 6 year old son's preferred desktop is google. Thats how he finds everything he wants to run.
    12. Re:Sadly, no... by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      . Maybe I should look into running a real OS (like linux or free/openBSD) on it, and running Sugar as a process that talks to X-Windows. I wonder how I'd learn to do that? A lot of people run various "mainstream"distributions of Linux on XO -- I just posted preliminary Ubuntu Hardy installation files and instructions.

      On this PB, I have four 90x30 non-overlapping Terminal windows open, with three of them ssh'd to other machines that I'm working on. With the XO, as far as I can tell, I can only get one terminal window at a time, and it's fewer chars than 90x30 (though I don't offhand remember its actual size). It won't give you four non-overlapping oversized terminal windows, but it will comfortably run few overlapping ones, plus Emacs, with multiple desktops.
      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    13. Re:Sadly, no... by cryingpoet · · Score: 1

      Okay. Is there any reason NOT to use an x86 CPU? The greatest reason not to use x86 is cost. The system will have less components (at least to manage the NAND) and make the printed circuit board (PCB) cheaper. The more pins on the processor means the more layers required for the PCB. Increasing the number of layers dramatically increases the board cost.

      It's actually 1200x900. The grayscale display is 1200x900. The color backlight display is 800x600.

      I'm not sure where you got your numbers from. laptop.org
    14. Re:Sadly, no... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You are making the incorrect assumption that the XO is supposed to be like a normal computer and it is not. It is too bad but way too many think the way you do and the whole project is getting a bad rep because of this misinformation. IMO.

      The XO needs to be able to perform the tasks that a normal computer performs. It doesn't need to be as fast at all the same things but it needs to be able to do them.

      The GP said that Sugar was neato but a long way from being ready for primetime. Nothing you have said actually contradicts this. Stability is more important than "usable for some learning activities".

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Sadly, no... by Locutus · · Score: 1

      The XO needs to be able to perform the tasks that a normal computer performs. It doesn't need to be as fast at all the same things but it needs to be able to do them.

      If you mean the following then I agree but these are not all "normal computer" operations:
      1) easily start/launch applications
      2) easily stop the application or switch to another
      3) easily restart the application on the data it was originally started with, not just the last dataset.
      4) easily start a mesh network session with one or many XO devices nearby
      5) easily enable the user identify one or many users around him/her
      6) easily invite one or many users to share applications and/or data
      7) easily allow applications to be created which have network sharing builtin

      There are quite a few others but these are the key elements of this particular devices requirements as I've come to understand it. As you can see, many of these are not standard on any device I've seen or heard of. An Apple Newton might fit the easy connect/share items but not the "or many" requirement. There's a bunch of power savings things in there too like the computer motherboard can sleep while the display still shows data and the mesh network device also operates on the mesh will the rest of the system is sleeping.

      If you have actually used the latest build or even the 656 build then you will know that all of these these things are in a complete stage or in the 90% complete stage of development. It is usable but no quite hitting 100% of the requirements yet. I've only had the device inhand for about 30 days now but we've spent hours using it and probably as many exploring its features. I've spent years on many different GUI systems from handhelds( dedicated and general purpose), PCs, workstations, and thin clients so I'm not a one trick pony of GUI design/use. Also, keeping in mind that the education of children is what the XO's intended use and the requirements set for this to meet that ends, Sugar on the XO does a great job.

      The GP said that Sugar was neato but a long way from being ready for primetime. Nothing you have said actually contradicts this. Stability is more important than "usable for some learning activities".

      I would not say it is a long way from primetime and you can argue that decades have been spent on very clunky Windows systems with the requirment to pay them for upgrades to make even basic features work. USB comes to mind. So if if there are changes required to Sugar as it matures, the mechanisms for updating are far far better than anything people have used on Windows. Their update-olpc script does a fantastic job at updating the system. Activity loading and installing is as easy as any Debian synaptic system and in some cases easier with batch installation capabilities.

      I can not see the device being anything but a chore to use if they try putting a standard desktop computer metaphor on the device and load standard, non-sharable applications on the device. Forcing the kids to deal with the file system to find and reload project data is just going to waste their time and the teachers time as hours and hours will be spent on getting students to find the file they just used last week and get it loaded so they can update it.

      At the very least, I would recommend you get the latest Ubuntu LiveCD( wait til tomorrows release ), boot it up as a liveCD, and then install the Sugar and Sugar-Activities packages. You should then be able to run Sugar on your laptop with some of the activities and some with that network sharing capabilities. You can also see how the Journal can be used to get back to your application data in a way which will work nicely in a classroom activity format. ie, assignments are right there at the top of the list where they stay as you complete them and then propagate down the list as they go unused after completion. You should also see the network neighborhood(f1) and network group(f2) screens Sugar has implemented. F1 gets you back to your Home screen

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  8. Re:GOOD... by samkass · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There were rumors posted at one point that Apple had offered to donate a core OS, but were turned down for not being completely open-source. Perhaps if those rumors had any truth, they could be fulfilled now. I'd sure rather have MacOS than linux or XP, given the choice, if I was a third world kid who wanted to learn something.

    --
    E pluribus unum
  9. Re:GOOD... by pembo13 · · Score: 1

    Yah, too bad for the whole point of freeing the world for the domination of a single US software company.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  10. Avatar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Maybe he was lured over to the fire nation.

    1. Re:Avatar by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Maybe he was lured over to the fire nation.

      My first thought was also that the story had something to do with the Nickelodeon series Avatar: The Last Airbender -- forget the network; think Miyazaki, not SpongeBob. Excellent series in the vast wasteland of American animated TV.

      However, it should be noted that Aang, the primary character, is not a Water Bender, but an Air Bender.

      (Somehow, the inevitable loss of Karma for this way-off-topic posting seems unusually appropriate.)

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    2. Re:Avatar by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My first thought was also that the story had something to do with the Nickelodeon series Avatar: The Last Airbender -- forget the network; think Miyazaki, not SpongeBob. Excellent series in the vast wasteland of American animated TV.

      This is a bit OT but just in case anyone out there was just thinking about running off to Netflix to order this one, don't. I did, and it was absolutely horrible. The plot was as crap as you can get, the production value was worse than Hentai let alone any actually credible Anime, and the voice acting is everything you've come to expect from American animated features, which is to say, very bad.

      To compare Avatar to anything by Miyazaki, and I do mean anything, is to greatly insult the man and his talent.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Avatar by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      To compare Avatar to anything by Miyazaki, and I do mean anything, is to greatly insult the man and his talent.

      I'll give you that -- I may have gone a bit too far by putting SpongeBob and Miyazaki on the same measuring stick. That may have been like using George W. Bush and Stephen Hawking as a comparison of intelligence.

      However, I think you've rated Avatar too harshly. It *has* a plot, which is more than you can say for just about any animated series generated in the US that I can think of. I'm not sure what part of the production values you're complaining about, but keep in mind that many peoples' impression of anime is that *it* is sorely lacking in production values -- looping the same punch over and over, etc. As for voice acting, I don't know what else we can do short of teaching all Americans enough Japanese to appreciate their much stronger voice acting tradition.

      Avatar isn't perfect, and it doesn't hold a candle to "Spirited Away" or "Princess Mononoke" -- or even "Pom Poko". But it's better than the rest, and its success just might encourage other studios to take a chance on animation for kids that doesn't utterly suck.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    4. Re:Avatar by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what part of the production values you're complaining about, but keep in mind that many peoples' impression of anime is that *it* is sorely lacking in production values -- looping the same punch over and over, etc.

      The lack of production value I'm talking about is the same one shared by basically every American animated series ever made. Simply put, the art style is childish, immature, and boring compared to even most garbage anime series like DragonballZ. Everything looks like junk after watching Anime for years. Water effects? Crap. Sunsets? I could do better in painter in just a few minutes, and I'm definitely no artist. Even subtlety of color is pretty much nowhere in American animation, and Avatar is no exception. Also, I have to say that the voice acting was bad enough to have been an English overdub.

      All in all, I think Transformers had just as much story, and for its day, far superior production values. Ditto for G.I. Joe.

      Most of the Anime I watch makes minimal reuse of frames, except during flashbacks. Even in Naruto, where something like 25% of the total episode content is flashbacks (maybe more) they actually draw the same bit of the fight scene from totally different angles. Talk about a lack of reuse... And Naruto is probably the best series to compare to DragonballZ because it has fight scenes that last three episodes or more, yet also has production value. All hail TV Tokyo.

      Avatar isn't perfect, and it doesn't hold a candle to "Spirited Away" or "Princess Mononoke" -- or even "Pom Poko". But it's better than the rest, and its success just might encourage other studios to take a chance on animation for kids that doesn't utterly suck.

      Yeah, I'm not seeing it. The primary reason why not is that while you can deal with somewhat adult themes, you can't really handle them in an adult manner in American animation, because you need a "G" (or at worst, "PG") rating in order to sell your product, while Anime will sell while it's unrated. The puritanical background of the USA strikes again! I'm not saying that kids' shows need tentacles or anything, but the fact remains that we treat children like animals or slaves in this country, not like humans. Japan apparently has a whole different mindset there.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. It looks by esocid · · Score: 5, Interesting
    like Bender was kind of forced to resign since all of his responsibilities were absorbed into the other 4 restructured areas. Since January the OLPC has lost three top execs, one of whom was asked to stop collaborating with Bender. Something seems a little fishy with this operation now.

    In an interview with BusinessWeek in early March, OLPC Chairman Negroponte said OLPC was "doing almost impossible things," and that the organization needed to be managed "more like Microsoft." He said OLPC was reorganizing into four departments and looking for a CEO to lead the nonprofit.
    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    1. Re:It looks by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      So you're saying there's something wrong with MS's management structure? Or are you just throwing out baseless speculation for kicks, with a little MS bashing for flavour?

      Oh, right, this is Slashdot...

    2. Re:It looks by esocid · · Score: 1

      Not that, it just sounds like now MS has its hand in it somehow. And I'm wondering how long that non-profit label lasts. Like I said, something just doesn't seem right about it now.

      --
      Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    3. Re:It looks by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Right, so it's baseless speculation with a little MS bashing thrown in for flavour.

      Honestly, the guy makes one reference to MS-like management structure, and all of a sudden it's an MS conspiracy?

      Sorry, no, it's far easier to just assume the most simple, obvious answer: OLPC is growing, and they've discovered they need to change the way they manage the project in order to succeed. I know, shocking. And what better model to use for managing a large project than that used by one of the *largest computer companies in the world*?

    4. Re:It looks by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      BTW, I should say "software companies", but since they don't just manufacture software, that isn't quite right either. Technology companies? *shrug*

  12. Related to Ivan Krstic's resignation by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 3, Informative

    It was the demotion of Bender that prompted Ivan Krstic' to resign last month, so the damage to OLPC by their stupid demotion of Bender is not limited to just the loss of him. I wonder if anyone else will be leaving over this?

    1. Re:Related to Ivan Krstic's resignation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      krstic is not a loss to OLPC; I worked there for 2 years and Ivan was nothing but an egotistical brat who never showed up for meetings where he was supposed to present code he'd written, because he never actually wrote more than 500 lines of code and instead got interns to do everything he should have been doing from day 1.

    2. Re:Related to Ivan Krstic's resignation by idlemachine · · Score: 1

      Hmm, open, honest criticism from Krstic vs an anonymous, ad hominem attack; I wonder which one to believe...

  13. Direct Link to Resignation letter by styryx · · Score: 4, Informative

    Direct Link to Resignation letter

    I was going to submit this story after finding it on Digg or Reddit; the headline was focusing on Negreponte(sp?) allegedly wishing to partner with MS to put XP on XO in order to sell more units. After reading the letter and there being no mention of it I decided against submission.

    1. Re:Direct Link to Resignation letter by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Well, even if the rumor was true, I don't think he would publicly say anything, if only to protect what is left of OLPC. If he did say anything, people would just call him selfish and uncaring for the children he wanted to help.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    2. Re:Direct Link to Resignation letter by Locutus · · Score: 1

      my thought was that there is an NDA which restricts him from saying such things. He may not have signed it but it sure sounds like Negroponte is willing to sign such a thing and NDA's can restrict organizations not just one or two in the org.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    3. Re:Direct Link to Resignation letter by westlake · · Score: 1

      I read the letter before submitting the story, but, be to perfectly honest. I couldn't extract much substance from it.

  14. Re:Oh Please! by Marcus+Green · · Score: 1

    What type of "real" software are you thinking of?

  15. more like Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    From the linked article In an interview with BusinessWeek in early March, OLPC Chairman Negroponte said OLPC was "doing almost impossible things," and that the organization needed to be managed "more like Microsoft."

    What does that mean? Does that mean OLPC is lacking paper clips or advanced audio technology that came hidden in a pink box? Or they lack negotiating skills that is needed to change a NO into a YES, aka ISO Norway style? May be they just need a can do guy like Bob...

  16. Re:GOOD... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There were rumors posted at one point that Apple had offered to donate a core OS, but were turned down for not being completely open-source. Perhaps if those rumors had any truth, they could be fulfilled now.

    I hope not. Look I'm as big of an OS X fan as anyone, but it is not really suited to the OLPC project in a number of ways. Also, the all OSS stack makes sense with regard to their mission, to bootstrap an intellectual property creation industry in these nations. Being able to edit and modify all the code provides a starting place for this project to sustain itself via the user base.

    I'd sure rather have MacOS than linux or XP, given the choice, if I was a third world kid who wanted to learn something.

    The OLPC software is very well designed for its core tasks of educating children, which is quite different from general purpose computing. As a kid, I'd much rather have had an OLPC that allows me to learn with all the other kids in my school, than even a modern OS X system. Swapping it out for OS X makes little more sense than doing the same with WinXP.

  17. Bender Was Quoted... by FrankDrebin · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... "bite my rubberized, lime-green ass."

    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
    1. Re:Bender Was Quoted... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      He went on to say:

      "I'm going to build my own OLPC! With blackjack and hookers! In fact, forget the OLPC. Aw, screw the whole thing."

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  18. Re:Oh Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS Office, of course! Tee hee.

  19. Water Bender Resigns! by mightypenguin · · Score: 1

    Oh well I thought there was some news about Avatar, but I guess I'll just have to keep waiting.

    1. Re:Water Bender Resigns! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was my double-take too. Honestly, I'm a bit miffed that more people are referencing Futurama Bender. (What's so great about that obnoxious turd anyway? I still haven't forgiven him for the Seymour incident.)

  20. Re:GOOD... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Wasn't the point to help kids?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  21. Re:Oh Please! by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2, Informative

    BWAHAHAHAHA!

    I am writing this response on one of those laptops, running prerelease Ubuntu Hardy that I have just configured for it.

    This laptop is not going to do any 3D modeling or video editing any soon, but for everything that belongs in a classroom it's fine.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  22. Re:GOOD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck the staving children in africa!

    Software is the FUTURE!

    Now where did I put that chair? Hmm...

  23. Actually... by nweaver · · Score: 4, Informative

    A: The x86 used is already very low power and very high integration, supporting sub-millisecond sleep states. With Amdahl's law being what it is, replacing the processor with a mystic 0 power CPU wouldn't add all that much to battery life. The TOTAL power consumption is 5W already, and the CPU's share of that power budget (when you consider CPU and not the associated control logic for memory, IO, etc) is low.

    And in return, x86 compatibility is a good thing, because it opens up a huge world of binary software. For one, x86 is far better supported by just about everybody.

    B: The OLPC actually uses a 15 W-Hr LiFeP (Lithium Ferro-Polymer) battery. Which is actually 4x the charge lifespan of LiIon, and has far greater environmental tolerance, and can even be composted for disposal.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:Actually... by Locutus · · Score: 1

      it's good to see somebody here actually has a clue about this device.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    2. Re:Actually... by cryingpoet · · Score: 1

      And in return, x86 compatibility is a good thing, because it opens up a huge world of binary software. For one, x86 is far better supported by just about everybody. The system libraries and applications code is architexture independant. They can be compiled for arm, ppc, mips, or x86 with only a couple of quick options. I cross comple complete system by simply swaping config files. Third party software compatibility is not a requirment on these systems. Actually having two diffent physicall designs/architecture would actually add second sourcing options.

      B: The OLPC actually uses a 15 W-Hr LiFeP (Lithium Ferro-Polymer) battery. Which is actually 4x the charge lifespan of LiIon, and has far greater environmental tolerance, and can even be composted for disposal. Although LiFeP is an option, most are sold with NiMH. I am not sure if this is due to avalibility or cost. I listed the wrong battery before, but my arguement stands. Please correct me if I am wrong.
  24. Quoted on departure by MK_CSGuy · · Score: 1

    On departure, Bender was spotted saying
    "I'm going to start my own laptop project with blackjack! and hookers!"

  25. Re:GOOD... by pembo13 · · Score: 1

    Getting African hooked on Microsoft products is helping them? Or teaching them tools that they can later modify and build on themselves is helping them? I mean really, do Slasdotters really have to stretch their imaginations that much to see how using non open platforms helps them less? It is definitely better than nothing, but at this point it isn't nothing. It is going from open to closed. If it had started out closed then the discussion would be different. Seriously, this is purely depressing at this point. Thanks guys. Really.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  26. Re:GOOD... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And how does making them dependent on a foreign company for any computer-related job (which, by the time they are grown up is likely to mean pretty much any job) helping them? Phase two of the project aims to have the countries that bought the first generation laptops manufacture their own version two, based on the designs and code from version one. If you install XP on them, then none of the children will develop the expertise to to write version two of the software stack.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  27. BS yes, but whose? by fm6 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nowhere in his exit statement does Bender contradict the rumors about him being forced out. Instead he gives the standard "leaving to pursue other interests". This is a conventional explanation people give to avoid antagonizing their former colleagues. This concept might be strange to shot-from-the-lip Slashdotters, but it is common among people who don't view life as extended flame war.

    You give a quote that seems intended to contradict the story, but doesn't really — this isn't just about whether or not the XO should run Windows. Besides, you don't say who you're quoting. One of your sock puppets, perhaps?

  28. Welcome to the Private Sector by Cajunator · · Score: 0
    http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/144911/top_olpc_executive_resigns_after_restructuring.html

    In February, Director of Security Ivan Krsti resigned from OLPC to protest the organization's restructuring and "radical" change in goals......."Following Walter's demotion from OLPC presidency, I was to report instead to a manager with no technical or engineering background who was put in charge of all OLPC technology," Krsti wrote. Welcome to the real world... Guess you should have taken the "blue pill"
  29. Re:GOOD... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

    4: Reflash the OS to something businesses can use.

    How would one "reflash" a child-sized keyboard to one suitable for use by adults' hands?

  30. Re:GOOD... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

    The OLPC software is very well designed for its core tasks of educating children

    I happen to think the Sugar UI and its activities contain a lot of terrific innovations, but being that I am not well-informed on the subject of educational pedagogy, I really can't say how well the software actually achieves its core tasks.

    It may be exciting for students to hack together small Python scripts in Pippy or have a collaborative jam session in TamTam, but how does that mesh with a core learning curriculum based on The Three R's?

  31. Re:Oh Please! by Locutus · · Score: 1

    really, for just under $200 you get a brand new and "much more powerful and real laptop"? That is pure bull and even the Eee PC at ~$300 is missing many of the required features the XO has. Dust, water, and physical abuse resistance is built into the XO but not even the ~$300 Eee PC or the Intel Classmate PC. The outdoor readable display and low power draining wireless mesh, also missing from these 'other' devices but standard on the XO.

    Sorry but you're a quack and don't know what you are talking about. And the OLPC XO is designed to be a learning tool by means of being a platform for interactive and collaborative applications while at the same time being a device to read electronic documents( ebooks ) because in the harshest environments where these are intended to be used, paper books don't last long at all.

    Do you somehow think that this devices is designed to be like an adults laptop and should therefore be used just as an adults laptop would be used? That and adults general purpose laptop computer and all it's complexity are what kids should be taught? WTF have you been over the last three years this has been talked about? It is a dedicated learning tool and not your standard laptop computer. It is by no means a toy.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  32. Re:Oh Please! by Locutus · · Score: 1

    interesting, now try this after adding the multiverse and/or universe repositories:

    sudo apt-get install sugar sugar-activities

    logout and then change the session type to Sugar and see what you get. ;-)

    You can also use the standard application install tool(s) if you're not a commandline speed junky. FYI, Sugar has not "logout" option so you have to either reboot or restart gdm to get back to the login screen to boot the XFCE desktop or what ever one you've installed.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  33. Re:GOOD... by Locutus · · Score: 1

    that maybe true for TimTam but one of the eToys does animation along with story telling. There's alot for kids to learn in just this one activity. There's the writing part in the story telling. There is the picture by picture part which might relay the concepts of cause and effect. Also, that small events tied together can create a very difficult or complex event. Whole classwork sections on story telling can be used to teach writing skills and and content creation while at the same time, they're having fun doing it.

    I hope that somewhere there is documentation on what the activities provide in the way of learning and what others have done to implement classroom sections using these activities. I believe this is the kind of open source-like education and sharing that Mr Bender is striving for. Teachers helping teachers around the world create better and better coursework in an open environment. I'm still hoping it'll happen.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  34. duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quick, grab the samples before they disappear! http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Sound_samples

    Everytime I hear "corporate restructuring" the voice in my head says "That's c.e.o. b.s. for stepping on people in the name of money, despite the 1st rule of death being 'you can't take it with you'", at which point an audible and double-edged "duh" escapes my lips.

  35. Surely you jest... by lysse · · Score: 1

    Come on, with the size of demand that's been uncovered for them? Nah. Certainly I can't see Asus giving up any time soon, since they're shifting Eees faster than they can ship them... and since I'm both broke and cheap, I've promised myself an Elonex ONE if/when they arrive.

  36. Benders next project by SubComdTaco · · Score: 2, Informative

    Negroponte said Bender was burned out after helping to shape OLPC for two years" But Bender already has new plans: to launch an independent effort to further the development of the XOs' homegrown software, known as Sugar, and get it to run on Linux computers other than XOs. "Sugar is in a narrow place and it is ripe to be unleashed," he wrote in an e-mail exchange. The AP article alos goes on to quote Negroponte as saying: "that an overriding insistence on open-source had hampered the XOs, saying Sugar "grew amorphously" and "didn't have a software architect who did it in a crisp way." For instance, the laptops do not support Flash animation, widely used on the Web. "There are several examples like that, that we have to address without worrying about the fundamentalism in some of the open-source community," he said. "One can be an open-source advocate without being an open-source fundamentalist." Negroponte added, Windows might be the sole operating system, and Sugar would be educational software running on top of it. That might disappoint advocates of open-source software who helped bankroll OLPC and cheered the challenge it represented to Microsoft's dominance. Unlike proprietary software like Windows, open-source applications are developed by a community of programmers and the underlying code is freely shared.

  37. Re:GOOD... by Hucko · · Score: 1

    I'm currently doing a Bachelor of Education, so I'll try explain what it could be -- I don't know OLPC's educational philosophy. Its all about constructivism; if it is 'pure' constructivism then the students decide what the problem is and solve it with the tools available, for more moderated constructivism the 'teacher' gives a goal, explains the use of the tools, then sets the students off to solve the problem "just like in real life." How this relates to the software, I'm afraid I haven't experienced it. I should probably try get it, I think.

    --
    Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  38. OLPC News is a Microsoft shill by Weezul · · Score: 1

    It appears Slashdot's editors didn't not even click the links. OLPC News is a Microsoft FUD shill. Don't like them except to point out that they are lying baboons.

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
  39. Re:GOOD... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    How would one "reflash" a child-sized keyboard to one suitable for use by adults' hands? Go look up "PDA", "Palmtop" etc etc.

    --
    Deleted
  40. constructionism by Jecel+Assumpcao+Jr · · Score: 1

    OLPC's educational philosophy was officially based on Papert and Kay's constructionism, which is related to constructivism but not the same thing.

    The idea is that students build actual things (even if software is rather abstract) which they can share with other students and the teacher as a reflection of the knowledge they have built inside their minds.

  41. Re:GOOD... by westlake · · Score: 1
    Yah, too bad for the whole point of freeing the world for the domination of a single US software company.

    60% of Microsoft's revenues come from outside the U.S. and these revenues are growing at a fantastic pace.

    Microsoft has an R&D presence pretty much everywhere in the world. It is working with an African university on the design and launch of a comsat for Africa. Microsoft has become a multinational.

  42. OLPC isn't a consumer device. by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    You don't cite any sources or define what you mean when you say "Asus is doing very well with its flagship offering.". However the chief error is more profound than that. Asus' business model isn't our problem either. Asus isn't running an educational project. Asus is just another corporation making just another laptop.

    Many people conflate OLPC's work (which really is an educational project) with making a low-end ultra-inexpensive laptop because they view everything through first world consumer's eyes. These same people tend also to be shocked that OLPC isn't using the G1G1 program to generate lots of profit.

  43. Re:GOOD... by xtracto · · Score: 1

    There were rumors posted at one point that Apple had offered to donate a core OS,

    The offer was dumped because the OLPC guys already knew that BSD is dead. ;-)

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  44. Sounds about right. by gnutoo · · Score: 1

    If you were engaged in a discussion with a person and suddenly six others showed up to shill and agree with the original one, how would you like that?

    Everytime I say something, I see a six or seven nutballs screaming Twitter. In this case the off topic thread is large and suspiciously well moderated. Oh well.

    1. Re:Sounds about right. by fm6 · · Score: 1

      "Suspiciously well-moderated"? Oooh, everybody's conspiring against the guy. Not wait, it's just a few nutballs. Or maybe it's one nutball posting under six or seven IDs...

      Whatever it is, you need to find a story and stick to it.

  45. olpcnews that's who's by gnutoo · · Score: 1

    I quoted the article. You would know that if you followed the link instead of flaming me. The author updated himself and quoted Bender quashing those stupid XP rumors.

    1. Re:olpcnews that's who's by fm6 · · Score: 1

      What article? The story links two, and neither has the quote you provide.

      Twitter, you get flamed because you're a BS artist. Grow up a little, stop playing stupid games with quotations and fake IDs, and we'll consider treating you with a little respect.

  46. Re:GOOD... by dunng808 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    being that I am not well-informed on the subject of educational pedagogy, I really can't say how well the software actually achieves its core tasks


    All too often those who claim proficiency in pedagogy are merely hiding their lack of brilliance behind a stack of journal articles and study results. I draw inspiration from Shin'ichi Suzuki, founder of Talent Education, who with no formal training in education single-handedly created one of the most successfull methods of teaching music to children. Back in the 70s Suzuki was widely criticized by American violin pedagogues who denounced him as a crackpot. The Suzuki method was built on a common sense view of learning which begins with this observation: children naturally learn their mother tongue without the help of experts. Therefore, children know how to learn, and mothers are the best teachers.

    Now apply that view to homeschooling and an interesting picture develops. Parents are fully qualified to teach young children. As children get older they benefit from subject matter experts, but it does not require a brick-and-morter school to provide them. K-12 teachers complain about the lack of parent involvement, especially as the children get older. With homeschoolers, the parent is always involved.

    how does that mesh with a core learning curriculum based on The Three R's?


    Hold on, there! Who says education has a core of three R's? Or a core of anything? This is just pedagogical pablum passed along year after year as if it were inscribed in stone by the almighty himself. Stringing together Python scripts could very well be much more relavent to today's children.
    --

    Gary Dunn
    Open Slate Project

  47. Re:Oh Please! by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    I am aware of that.

    It should be relatively easy to run Sugar in Xephyr, so both environments can coexist (good for development, bad for UI testing).

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  48. Re:Oh Please! by msouth · · Score: 1

    3d modeling and video editing do belong in classrooms.

    --
    Liberty uber alles.
  49. Re:Oh Please! by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    3d modeling and video editing do belong in classrooms. They belong in an art or trade school, kids have more widely applicable things to study -- like math, sciences, engineering, literature, etc. Also no one should learn 3D modeling and video editing on a computer he can carry -- inexperienced user needs massive amount of resources and very large screen to be able to do anything with it.
    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  50. Re:Oh Please! by msouth · · Score: 1

    3d modeling and video editing do belong in classrooms.

    They belong in an art or trade school, kids have more widely applicable things to study -- like math, sciences, engineering, literature, etc.


    No, we should do as much interesting stuff as early as possible. If you force kids to 'learn' what you term "widely applicable" (but, to them, pointless and boring) things like algebra, it fails. They don't really learn algebra. The only kids who learn algebra are the ones who go on to a science or similar career and would have learned it anyway in the course of their study/work in that field. What kids need is interesting, challenging stuff, including things like video editing and 3d modeling, that they will really sink their teeth into voluntarily. They will learn much, much more on projects they are interested on.

    Before you argue back, keep in mind that your presence on slashdot probably means you were in the crowd that _was_ interested in math when they were pushing it in school. Unlike you, for most of your classmates, algebra class was worse than a waste of time.

    Also no one should learn 3D modeling and video editing on a computer he can carry -- inexperienced user needs massive amount of resources and very large screen to be able to do anything with it.


    I wasn't arguing whether they belong on a laptop, just in school. Having said that, I'll point out that you can use iMovie on a pretty small screen with good results. You can have very interesting 3d modeling applications running on small processors and screens, I'm sure. Just takes a little creativity and the realization that you won't be using an XO to produce the next Lord of the Rings.

    What kind of processor ran Battlezone?
    --
    Liberty uber alles.
  51. Reinvent the wheel by cryingpoet · · Score: 1

    I quite agree. There is no reason to reinvent the wheel. I have been screaming that they should have used Maemo or some other Webpad GUI. Keyboard and mouse support is built in and the icons are big already. Add Open Office then SHIP.

  52. Re:Oh Please! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    They belong in an art or trade school, kids have more widely applicable things to study -- like math, sciences, engineering, literature, etc.

    If you don't think 3d modeling is useful to learning math, sciences, and engineering, you are a genuine idiot. And if you do not think that video editing can help you learn literature you have no imagination, to boot. But perhaps I'm just misunderstanding you? Regardless, your comment is proof positive that a low slashdot ID doesn't mean anything.

    Also no one should learn 3D modeling and video editing on a computer he can carry -- inexperienced user needs massive amount of resources and very large screen to be able to do anything with it.

    While my laptop is WORLDS ahead of the XO, I have a Compaq nw9440 which is MORE than adequate for learning 3d graphics with its Core Duo, 2GB memory, and nVidia Quadro FX1500 with 1680x1050 resolution. It is in a meganotebook (17") form factor with a three button touchpad and a full keyboard.

    Given that many people got their start on an Amiga running Lightwave 3D on, say, a 25MHz processor and with maybe 8MB of RAM, and at NTSC resolutions (even interlaced with overscan you're looking at maybe 800x480 or so on an OCS or ECS Amiga) I'd say you pretty much have no idea what you're talking about.

    By the way, google sketchup is a 3d modeler which can be immediately useful in a variety of projects and which doesn't require a degree to use. Perhaps you've heard of it? I bet many kids could learn to use that if they weren't being treated like idiots by arrogant assholes who think they know everything about how everyone else learns.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  53. Re:GOOD... by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It may be exciting for students to hack together small Python scripts in Pippy or have a collaborative jam session in TamTam, but how does that mesh with a core learning curriculum based on The Three R's?

    Children are small humans (shocking but true) and humans learn best when they are involved with something with which they are interested. Computers are useful for this sort of thing because they are applicable to basically everything.

    Here's a simple truth for you: Those who are able to manipulate information have an edge over those who do not. For instance I can make my own vector maps instead of paying for them; I can also get my own information on the nutritive value of foods instead of buying a carb counter book simply by downloading a freely available government database.

    I was in a GATE program in elementary school and they told me I could not participate in astronomy because I was too young. Today I am a math idiot. Perhaps if instead of quashing my enthusiasm, they had presented me with mathematics related to something I was interested in, I would be more comfortable with it today? Unfortunately, even so-called "Gifted and Talented" programs are really just a means to "deal with" "problem children" (I was disruptive because I was bored) and to park them somewhere.

    What I'm trying to say is that presenting children with the maximum number of options is critical. Lots of the functionality on the system isn't necessary for all purposes. You have the option to not use it all. Meanwhile, including it may be what gets one more child interested in something that saves our collective bacon. You never know.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  54. Re:Oh Please! by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    3D modeling and video editing done right are VERY HARD AND TEDIOUS WORK, they require good spatial awareness and taste, and they contribute very little to one's knowledge. Done poorly they are much worse than painting, drawing or music done poorly, so they are deep in the area with diminishing returns when it comes to general education.

    This is why they are not in the basic curriculum of anything -- least of all schools that are going to use those laptops.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  55. Re:Oh Please! by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    If you don't think 3d modeling is useful to learning math, sciences, and engineering, you are a genuine idiot. I think, it became a tradition on Slashdot for someone to tell "if you think [something], you are an idiot" when they have no good argument to support their opposing position.

    And if you do not think that video editing can help you learn literature you have no imagination, to boot. No, I think that watching movies instead of reading books hurts people's understanding of literature. How video editing, that is two or three degree further away from literature, can help or hurt, I have no idea unless you are suggesting that a group of 20-30 kids should study literature by making movies based on books, complete with realistic costumes and special effects. When I was a kid, a plain old drama club was something that few were able to enjoy.

    But perhaps I'm just misunderstanding you? Regardless, your comment is proof positive that a low slashdot ID doesn't mean anything. My Slashdot ID merely says that I have joined right after this site was announced. My dislike of stupidity is entirely unrelated to this.

    While my laptop is WORLDS ahead of the XO, I have a Compaq nw9440 which is MORE than adequate for learning 3d graphics with its Core Duo, 2GB memory, and nVidia Quadro FX1500 with 1680x1050 resolution. It is in a meganotebook (17") form factor with a three button touchpad and a full keyboard. It's also absolutely inappropriate for a middle or high school environment, and is barely acceptable for in-class work at a university. More so if intended to be carried by every student. Heck, I am nowhere close to the hectic and occasionally violent environment of a high school, and I would think twice before carrying a 17" laptop through a crowd, or placing it on a desk that is not at least as heavy as I am. And once my laptop that had about twice the performance of a XO was taken by robbers who assaulted me in San Francisco.

    Given that many people got their start on an Amiga running Lightwave 3D on, say, a 25MHz processor and with maybe 8MB of RAM, and at NTSC resolutions (even interlaced with overscan you're looking at maybe 800x480 or so on an OCS or ECS Amiga) I'd say you pretty much have no idea what you're talking about. Whatever Amiga could do in 80's, this laptop can, too. I am sure, if I wanted to remake Tron on it, I would end up with a result technically superior to the original, though I don't find it (or your laptop) the best tool for such a job. Neither of those things is in any way suitable as a part of a school curriculum because, as I have mentioned before, it's hard, tedious work, and few people care for it more than, say, knitting.

    By the way, google sketchup is a 3d modeler which can be immediately useful in a variety of projects and which doesn't require a degree to use. Perhaps you've heard of it? I bet many kids could learn to use that if they weren't being treated like idiots by arrogant assholes who think they know everything about how everyone else learns. Actually I support the idea that kids (and some adults) should be KEPT THE HELL AWAY from tools that enforce a particular, narrow model of thinking and organizing one's work, lest they will learn not how to think about the things they are doing, but how to mindlessly follow a strict pattern of thought that follows from functionality of a tool. Except for adults it usually involves UML.
    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  56. OLPC is still a silly project by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    I suppose that once they're done, every child will be able to surf the net and get trolled on MySpace even though they can't eat...

    What good is a laptop to you when you can't even say where your next meal will come from?

    1. Re:OLPC is still a silly project by Stanistani · · Score: 1

      Looks like if they want to get trolled, they can just log on Slashdot and EmagGeek will do the honors.

      "You've got an OLPC? You must be starving to death! Turn that sucker off and go gather grubs! Bet you wish you had clean water instead! I'm sure no one built any infrastructure in your country, 'cause they're all spending the dough on education, and we all know education is useless! Back to the Stone Age for you!"

    2. Re:OLPC is still a silly project by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      What a good laugh I got out of your reasoning. Not much else is useful if you do not have that which is necessary for survival.

    3. Re:OLPC is still a silly project by Stanistani · · Score: 1

      Correct. However, OLPC is being placed in areas ready for the next step - upgrading the educational infrastructure.

      You know this, and are just being a dick.

      Hence I will filter you out.

      Bye.

  57. Re:Oh Please! by msouth · · Score: 1

    3D modeling and video editing done right are VERY HARD AND TEDIOUS WORK, they require good spatial awareness and taste, and they contribute very little to one's knowledge. Done poorly they are much worse than painting, drawing or music done poorly, so they are deep in the area with diminishing returns when it comes to general education.

    Mathematics done right is extremely exacting. It resembles what is done in school not one iota, except possibly the proofs done in geometry. 3D modeling and video editing at the professional level are, indeed, way beyond the range of the average student. So is what a professional mathematician does. Completely outside the realm of possibility for all but the most prodigious students. That doesn't matter. The point is that kids will learn what they are interested in learning, and they will not learn what they are not interested in learning. They may regurgitate it, temporarily cram it in, whatever, but by and large it's a waste of time.

    If you have cool projects for kids to do that interest them, they will learn. It doesn't have to be professional level. It just has to be, as some people put it, "hard fun". That's the sweet spot for education. Interesting and challenging but doable.
    --
    Liberty uber alles.
  58. Re:Oh Please! by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    Mathematics done right is extremely exacting. It resembles what is done in school not one iota, except possibly the proofs done in geometry. While I won't call things modern mathematicians do similar to what school math courses look like, the content of school math courses is VERY useful applicable to the everyday life. School math courses aren't there to make you a mathematicians, they are to teach you the foundation of math that are necessary for a wide range of applications. 3D modeling and video editing at the professional level are, indeed, way beyond the range of the average student. So is what a professional mathematician does. Completely outside the realm of possibility for all but the most prodigious students. That doesn't matter. The point is that kids will learn what they are interested in learning, and they will not learn what they are not interested in learning. They may regurgitate it, temporarily cram it in, whatever, but by and large it's a waste of time. Then I am almost afraid of asking, what in your opinion "nonprofessional" 3D modeling and video editing are. That damn spinning "E-Mail" gif? Loituma remix #65537 on youtube? I am sure, not encouraging kids to produce those abominations will only contribute to their sanity.

    If you have cool projects for kids to do that interest them, they will learn. It doesn't have to be professional level. It just has to be, as some people put it, "hard fun". That's the sweet spot for education. Interesting and challenging but doable. For those few who will find it "hard fun" to do things that require massive amount of processing power, a school can easily provide a dozen of media-oriented desktops, database servers, clusters, CAD workstations along with CNC machine tools and other things that are far beyond the level of something a student would want to carry into every classroom. For most 2D bitmap and vector editing, music composition, 2D CAD drawing, C or Python software development and calculations will be the most CPU-intensive tasks actually involved in studying, and those things, being common, should be better supported on individual laptops.
    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  59. We CAN help the developing world by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

    The Open Source community could build something that would make a real difference in the developing world --

    if we stopped dicking around with laptops and started collaborating on high-yield, low-input agricultural methods, water reclamation systems, sanitation, and low-conventional-energy devices generally. Great examples: the discovery that pouring water through silk provides enough filtration to substantially reduce the incidence of cholera; the development of solar cooking technologies to help stop deforestation and prevent women from having to gather firewood alone in regions with prevalent rape gangs.
    THAT is the kind of tech that we should be working on collaboratively. Though there isn't any Linux involved.

    OLPC is a great idea, but it doesn't actually address the real problems of the developing world--which aren't web browsing, intuitive programming, and videoconferencing, but security, environmental repair, and conventional-energy-independent development! All this talktalk about laptops has always been the well-meaning but sorely out of touch "help" provided by people who know tons about OSS but have no idea what people in developing countries really need.

    --
    Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
  60. regarding running Sugar from Ubuntu liveCD by Locutus · · Score: 1

    it does work and if I can remember the final steps, it shouldn't be too difficult for many to try it out.

    1) boot the Ubuntu LiveCD with a network connection
    2) open Synaptic Page Manager( System->Administration->Synaptic...)
    3) enable the Universe repository found in Synaptics Settings->Repositories menus
    4) reload as the dialog will suggest
    5) do a Synaptic search for Sugar using the search icon in the upper right of the application
    6) select Sugar and Sugar-Activities
    7) Click the Apply button
    8) when all is done, go to the Login Manager(System->Administration->Login Manager) and unCheck the option for only single user login.
    9) switch user from the top launch bar on the desktop, change the Session Type to Sugar, and use the "ubuntu" username with no password.

    You should now be running Sugar with a bunch of activities already installed. I only tried the chat activity and it works great. Start it, share it with the network and then invite people to join from the network view(f1).

    For some reason, I could not get the web activity to work though it works fine in my installed version of Sugar on Ubuntu 8.04.

    Really, this desktop system( Sugar ) and the Journal are a really nice UI for the classroom so that the teacher does not have to spend much time on the UI. Also, students can easily get to their assignments right from the Journal and finish up what they were doing in class. Again, without very much training at all.

    FYI, some activities like eToys are not 'real' Sugar activities and are instead Sqeak/Smalltalk applications wrapped in Sugar. Many of the native Sugar activities work as would be expected.

    Anybody who's thinking of chiming in on this thread should have spent a couple of hours exploring this system with the understanding that it is designed for children in a classroom with a teacher organizing classwork and homework. IMO.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  61. Re:Oh Please! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    It's also absolutely inappropriate for a middle or high school environment

    Why?

    Anyway, you can get just as much power (with a bit less resolution, naturally) in a 15" or smaller package. Hell, geeks.com has a ~$2300 12" core duo (or was it core 2 duo?) tablet right now. Expensive, 'cause tablets are.

    Whatever Amiga could do in 80's, this laptop can, too. I am sure, if I wanted to remake Tron on it, I would end up with a result technically superior to the original

    Technically superior? Only if it actually looked better somehow. Which I doubt you would achieve on your own.

    Neither of those things is in any way suitable as a part of a school curriculum because, as I have mentioned before, it's hard, tedious work, and few people care for it more than, say, knitting.

    The school curriculum is designed to produce factory workers and soldiers. Period, end of story. They are not actually trying to educate children to be successful. They are making drones. Why else would you get them up at an unnatural hour (teenagers do NOT function well in the morning, no matter when they go to sleep) and put them under fluorescent lights (shown in clinical studies to reduce efficiency, increase irritability, and in fact to produce symptoms of ADD) for eight hours?

    (Actually, producing ADD symptoms is a great way to sell Ritalin and its ilk; these drugs became prevalent only after the huge worldwide boom in military amphetamine use in WWII; the methamphetamine abuse epidemic began soon after. The entire school system is a machine which chews up kids and spits them out. Sending your child to public school is child abuse, plain and simple. I have said this to the faces of parents I know who send their children to public school, and I will do it again.

    Actually I support the idea that kids (and some adults) should be KEPT THE HELL AWAY from tools that enforce a particular, narrow model of thinking and organizing one's work, lest they will learn not how to think about the things they are doing, but how to mindlessly follow a strict pattern of thought that follows from functionality of a tool.

    Computers aren't that tool, though, unless you're locked into a very small way of looking at them.

    The Computer is the uber-multi-tool. It can become so many other tools (albeit similar ones) that to talk about using it forcing you into a particular mindset is so myopic as to be functionally blind.

    You are presenting a "particular, narrow" point of view, the idea that computers must somehow stunt your development. Instead, they can be transformative. If I have a narrow way of thinking as a result of my long association with computers, it is only because other aspects of my development were neglected (like practically all of them) and the computer and the library were the only things that saved me. Which brings me to another point; you act like the computer must necessarily replace all other forms of learning. But maybe you've got such a mental block about the computer being a "bad" learning tool that you don't even see your mistake. While I am a big ol' computer nerd, I am also interested (and involved!) with other disciplines. I can build things out of wood, I can fix cars including electrical and A/C (so basically everything, with the book anyway) and

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"