Slashdot Mirror


Usability Testing Hardy Heron With a Girlfriend

toomin writes "Reviews of the latest Ubuntu version, 8.04 Hardy Heron, are everywhere, but most of them are undertaken by geeks familiar with Linux. This guy sits his girlfriend down at a brand-new Ubuntu installation and asks her to perform some basic tasks. Some of them are surprisingly easy, others frustrate and annoy. There are lots of little usability tweaks he stumbles upon just by seeing the desktop experience from the point of view of the mainstream user."

25 of 846 comments (clear)

  1. I call Shenanigans!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A Linux geek with a girlfriend?? Yeah right!

    1. Re:I call Shenanigans!! by cloakable · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not even Microsoft does usability testing - look at Vista!

      --
      No tyrant thrives when every subject says no.
  2. He does what with his girlfriend ? by BattleCat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Something is surely wrong, when instead of fscking her right proper he sits her down with Ubuntu...

    1. Re:He does what with his girlfriend ? by tgd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Woh, I swear I thought you said fscking her right pooper and I wondered what kind of girl this is that has a right and left pooper.

    2. Re:He does what with his girlfriend ? by Wiseman1024 · · Score: 5, Funny

      While task number 14 would be to try backports. I'd love backporting her to the current version of my hardy hardon.

      --
      I was about to say 13256278887989457651018865901401704640, but it appears this number is private property.
  3. Smart move by caution+live+frogs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's how user testing should be done. It is really much too difficult for someone familiar with the program or OS to see what is not obvious or confusing to a novice user. The people that program the UI don't always think like a user - they usually think like a programmer, and that doesn't always work.

    1. Re:Smart move by MMC+Monster · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I agree. I expected this article to be a little silly, but it was well thought out.

      The new user was given a bunch of common tasks (play some music, draw a picture, play a video on youtube, use an instant messenger on MSN network, install a commonly used application (skype), edit a photo) and asked to perform them on a default installation of Ubuntu.

      Well done. The Ubuntu team (and other linux distributions) can learn a lot from this article alone. Hopefully it will give a target for other usability testing in the future.

      (And, no, I have nothing to do with the article author or website.)

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    2. Re:Smart move by Bombula · · Score: 5, Insightful
      What is positively astonishing is how persistent this problem is. Look back at the thousands of linux threads over the last 10 years, and you will see the SAME complaint again and again, and again. And again. And AGAIN. It is farking ridiculous.

      How hard is it to sit down and run a simple test like the (excellent) one this guy did with his girlfriend for every release?

      To Ubtunu's credit, most of the fault lies with the applications and not with the OS itself. Well-designed apps like Skype make things simple and intuitive for new users. But Ubuntu itself could develop specs for developers that required basic intros, wizards, etc for introducing and explaining the simple but non-obvious stuff to new users. Conversion rates would then skyrocket.

      Again, there is no logical reason why this hasn't been implemented before. The only explanation is therefore stupidity on the part of the developers - both on the OS and the app side. Cue the irony tag, given how clever most of these folks like to think they are. I guess what it shows is that being a math jock or code monkey with a stratospheric IQ doesn't make you a good UI designer any more than it makes you a suave and charming socialite.

      --
      A-Bomb
    3. Re:Smart move by ray-auch · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Again, there is no logical reason why this hasn't been implemented before.

      The word "girlfriend" should be a clue...

    4. Re:Smart move by Cato · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually usability testing has been going on with Linux for many years - since at least 2001 for GNOME when Sun started doing this ( http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/usertesting.html ). Here's a good article that talks about usability testing for Linux, also from 2001, and mentioning KDE user testing: http://lwn.net/2001/0614/desktop.php3

      GNOME is the way it is today largely because of usability testing, I believe - while many power users and developers whinge about this, it is becoming much closer to Macs in overall usability.

      So the issue is not "stupid developers", it's a matter of taking the time to do the testing - and it helps if you have some expertise at running the tests. Then it's the time to actually make the changes. Many developers aren't that interested in doing the testing, which is why there have been separate usability initiatives that can feed changes into projects.

      Some of the issues logged here are not that easy to solve - e.g. making Firefox pop up an Ubuntu-specific Flash installation prompt, rather than executing the YouTube JavaScript logic that pushes people towards an Adobe plugin site that actually does have a Linux plugin for Flash, but one that's much harder to install than an Ubuntu-packaged Flash plugin.

      Also, the one about finding MP3s on the Windows partition is not that easy - you could simply copy the files across with the Ubuntu migration assistant, but what if they're in a non-standard place? Indexing the Windows filesystem to quickly find these might help, but building the index could take some time. However, it would probably be enough if there was some feature in Ubuntu that scanned for existing partitions and said (based on partition type and a few key directories/files) that 'this looks like a Windows partition, it's available on the desktop through this icon', and ideally did a special symbolic link for the My Documents or similar (though that's tough as it's per-user under Windows - which user should this use).

    5. Re:Smart move by grm_wnr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, it doesn't. I fact, it is a already a huge advantage that she did not have to install Ubuntu (Note: It's not that installing Windows is easier, but people do not install Windows, they buy computers with Windows on them. This is a real problem that no amount of whining about the unfairness of it all will make go away.) Now, imagine if she had the wrong wireless chipset; 0/12 points right there, instantly.

    6. Re:Smart move by KutuluWare · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not really. The goal isn't to make Ubuntu "as easy to use as Vista". The goal is to make Ubuntu "usable by everyone". Comparisons to Windows will only invite the subconscious tendancy to stop when Ubuntu reaches parity, no matter how counter-intuitive it may be.

      Doing things the "Windows way" is frequently easier because people are familiar with it, in which case it makes sense. But there are plenty of things Windows gets way wrong that Linux can get right.

    7. Re:Smart move by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who cares?
      The aim is to make the Linux desktop experience better, not to justify it's failings as somehow being ok because it's just as difficult to use as windows.
      "Easier than a Mac!" That should be the mantra, not:
      "Windows is just as crusty!"...

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    8. Re:Smart move by malevolentjelly · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, Windows has 91% of the OS market share.

      At this point, you need to win those people over by offering an easy experience. At first, people will treat it like Windows. After a while, people will eventually treat it like Ubuntu. Linux still has a hold over userbase from the DOS world where men were men and functionality was won through hard labor.

      This probably occurs when people switch to mac as well.

      But you are right- if Ubuntu ever matches Windows' functionality or market share, they will probably slow down in usability development. Like most open source (and closed source to a lesser extent) it grows through mimickery.

  4. Girlfriend? by angryfirelord · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is slashdot! I don't have a girlfriend, you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:Girlfriend? by grm_wnr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Open synaptic and install girlfriend (or just apt-get girlfriend like a true geek). Beware of the dependencies though.

    2. Re:Girlfriend? by hedleyroos · · Score: 5, Funny

      Real geeks compile their girlfriends from source.

    3. Re:Girlfriend? by David+Gerard · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's sudo apt-get girlfriend. It typically requires full access and control of your system.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
  5. ports... by Anoraknid+the+Sartor · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where do I get this "with a girlfriend" release? .. of course with my luck, the "girlfriend" will be the openbsd version, and ship with all ports closed by default.

    --
    Find Japanese addresses in English on Google Maps Japan: http://diddlefinger.com/
  6. Interesting by chuckymonkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's pretty interesting. On a tangentially related note, a guy I work with just install Ubuntu as his first linux. A friend and I were talking about 8.04 and he overheard us, so he walked up and started asking questions about it which we answered. The next day he shows up to work and says that he installed it and is really liking it. What is this world coming to when a normal guy one day hears about linux and the next successfully installs it without asking the local nerds for help? It was really interesting, he said the hardest thing was burning the ISO, other than that he said it was easier to use and set up than windows. Trust me when I say that this guy is very very average when it comes to computer smarts, this was a huge leap for him and it was no trouble at all. That's how I know linux is heading mainstream.

    --
    "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
    1. Re:Interesting by bmorency · · Score: 5, Funny

      Free IT support when I'm available at home Your wife wants to switch to linux because she will get free support from you? Did you charge her when she was using windows? :-)
  7. Re:Exceptionally good. by 4D6963 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    2) Watch youtube. Unsuccessful. No Flash.
    11) MSN. Unsuccessful

    Yeah well, I have a girlfriend too, and all she ever does on a computer is watch music videos on YouTube, write e-mails and chat on MSN. Maybe you'd like to weight your rating based on how important something is to the person tested (by asking them). Downloading a torrent and changing your mouse speed will probably rate to 0 while MSN will probably rate to "Why the hell would I need a computer if not for MSN?".

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  8. Re:No Windows Clone by grm_wnr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And most people would rather stay with XP instead of moving to Vista. Just like they'd rather stay with XP than moving to Ubuntu.

  9. That this story even exists is part of the problem by beadfulthings · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, and it's a huge part. It's the 800 pound gorilla part.

    Testing for useability needs to come in much, much earlier in development, and it needs to involve a much wider cross-section of human beings. And as it's being done, development of adequate documentation and help needs to go hand and hand with it.

    It's so easy to disparage girlfriends, the middle-aged, and the elderly--in short, anyone whose job or study is not technical--that I think it's becoming ingrained in the cultures responsible for developing the various operating-system distributions and open-source software packages. This is going to cause them to suffer over the long haul. It's what makes them such a tough sell to people in business.

    There's an immense population of middle-aged people, for example, still in the work force. And interestingly enough, they've actually now all got 20 or 25 years' experience as end-users of computer systems. They're not stupid. They all have jobs that they need to get done. They're not interested in being part of user communities and forums. They're not interested in the ideals of free and open-source software. They're not interested in sticking it to Microsoft. They're not interested in that warm feeling of accomplishment that until recently accompanied getting your printers hooked up to OpenOffice--after wasting hours of productive time doing it. They're interested in using their computers as tools to accomplish their current day's work.

    Issues of usability and documentation aren't much fun. They're probably the least glamorous and most boring functions of developing the software. That's why they get such short shrift in open-source development. Nobody really wants to take them on, so we're treated to excrescenses like having people guess how to get out to a command line to install their audio player or their scanner or their printer.

    Large-scale developers of proprietary software know precisely where their bread is buttered, and they attend to all this as a matter of course.

    "Girlfriend" articles seem to appear quite regularly every few months, so at least somebody is thinking about this even at a ridiculous level. A lot more people need to be thinking about it at a much more serious level.

    --
    "Here's what's happening. You're starting to drive like your Dad..." - Red Green
  10. Re:Exceptionally good. by Spudds · · Score: 5, Insightful

    By the time you are telling them "GIMP... which stants for GNU Image Manipulation Program.. GNU is for GNU is not Unix" they lost all interest and just tell you to please resintall Windows. Who the hell would do that?
    If you're talking to a novice you're not going to go into tons of detail about acronyms and such, you're going to say "GIMP does stuff that photoshop does"

    I think your argument is silly.