Slashdot Mirror


Google Sets Sights On 3D Map of the Oceans

Several readers wrote to tell us about one of the next major projects to enter the Google-verse. We already have pretty views of the Earth and the Sky, the next target is apparently a 3D map of the oceans. "The tool — for now called Google Ocean, the sources say, though that name could change — is expected to be similar to other 3D online mapping applications. People will be able to see the underwater topography, called bathymetry; search for particular spots or attractions; and navigate through the digital environment by zooming and panning. (The tool, however, is not to be confused with the 'Google Ocean' project by France-based Magic Instinct Software that uses Google Earth as a visualization tool for marine data.)"

83 comments

  1. Why? by Trent+Hawkins · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does this have anything to do with their under water fortress of doom?

    1. Re:Why? by genner · · Score: 1

      It's called the happy dome. Everyone knows Google isn't evil.

  2. Google needs to work getting images and map data.. by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Google needs to work getting images and map data up to date in Earth / maps right now.

  3. Google mantra by everphilski · · Score: 1

    Quantity, not quality

  4. Google needs to update their satellite photos by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Tell me about it.

    I bet one or two photos would update the whole town, too.

  5. Quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm guessing they don't want to put a huge budget toward something as trivial as this. In place of a normal map, it'll just be a huge blue square with a few random images of fish. "This is the Atlantic Ocean. Oh look, there's a barracuda."

  6. Easter egg #1 by StefanJ · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cthulhu's watery resting place.

    Hmmmm, just think: With Greenland and Antarctica melting, Google Ocean will eventually get bigger as Google Earth shrinks a bit around the edges.

    1. Re:Easter egg #1 by mikael · · Score: 1
      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  7. Becaue it is more relevant than space by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We have better understanding of far away stars etc than we do of our own oceans, yet the oceans are far more important to our existence. Hat's off to Google!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Becaue it is more relevant than space by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 0

      Agreed, not to mention, we can now hopefully view which cables NOT to cut on our next fishing expeditions.

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    2. Re:Becaue it is more relevant than space by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hat's off to Google!

      <grammar nazi>Who is Hat and why is he going to Google?</grammar nazi>

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    3. Re:Becaue it is more relevant than space by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Hat's off to Google!
      <grammar nazi>Who is Hat and why is he going to Google?</grammar nazi>
      You don't end being a Grammar Nazi ("</grammar nazi>"), you just learn to bite your tongue.

      Or possibly you change your politics, or stop eating the gram flour.

      Or you move out of Denmark.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    4. Re:Becaue it is more relevant than space by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I don't think an asteroid can rise up from the ocean and slam into the Earth again.

    5. Re:Becaue it is more relevant than space by swimsaturn · · Score: 1

      Even when it comes to mapping, we have more complete coverage, and better resolution, of the global topography of Mars (thanks to the Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter) than of Earth.

    6. Re:Becaue it is more relevant than space by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Its also completely boring to most people. Dirty water! Enough already.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    7. Re:Becaue it is more relevant than space by msromike · · Score: 1

      Citation please. Or in lieu please post some links to your work.

  8. Too much money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now they are just inventing silly things to do. I am convinced that the "break rooms" are crack dens.

  9. Microsoft is kicking Googles ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    when it comes to maps, MS seem to have the cash to purchase better imaging. http://maps.live.com/ has a worse interface but the data is so
    Google maps was the best (better than MS virtualearth) when it was first released
    but now its starting to show its age with its images

    1. Re:Microsoft is kicking Googles ass by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      True its just a shame, that
      1) i cant use it on linux
      2) its google earth that is linked into otherwebsites

      it looks to me like google have the technical know how but like me, once you've sorted out the problem, who can be arsed with the details (e.g pictures). Solution, hire in outsiders to do the booring bits.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  10. another way to waste my time ? by cheap.computer · · Score: 0

    Why would anyone waste their time navigating a 3D image of the ocean ? ... just curious...

    1. Re:another way to waste my time ? by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone waste their time navigating a 3D image of the ocean ? ... just curious... I would think that the bigger question is how difficult it must be to keep that think updated... you know, with the waves and tides constantly moving and all it would be out of date right after you mapped it!

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    2. Re:another way to waste my time ? by myth_of_sisyphus · · Score: 1

      I would like to play Google-sub through the Marianis. Wouldn't you?

      Sheesh, what do you do at work?

  11. Cash, Philanthropy, or World Domination by webword · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google continues to crank out new services, products, APIs, tools, and more. It's really quite staggering, but they do have the cash and brains to do it. But the investments they make are huge. I'm talking about money, time and brainpower.

    Is latest action to make the entire world's information accessible for cash in some way? Is it some sort of philanthropy? You know, another gift to the world? Or, is there some other plan for world domination?

    Speaking of world domination...

    Who will be the most angry about all of this?

    * Aquaman
    * Poseidon
    * Neptune
    * Little Mermaid
    * The Mariner (Kevin Costner, Waterworld)

    1. Re:Cash, Philanthropy, or World Domination by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      * Poseidon
      * Neptune Definitely neither of them, they're still too busy bitching over who had the best god of the sea implementation.
      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    2. Re:Cash, Philanthropy, or World Domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who will be the most angry about all of this?

      * Aquaman
      * Poseidon
      * Neptune
      * Little Mermaid
      * The Mariner (Kevin Costner, Waterworld) Nessy!
    3. Re:Cash, Philanthropy, or World Domination by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      Who will be the most angry about all of this? * Aquaman * Poseidon * Neptune * Little Mermaid * The Mariner (Kevin Costner, Waterworld) Cthulhu!
      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    4. Re:Cash, Philanthropy, or World Domination by fluxindamix · · Score: 1

      but of course, Dirk Pitt, and Admiral Sandecker will be the most upset. Poor Hiram Yaeger will commit suicide...

    5. Re:Cash, Philanthropy, or World Domination by dredwerker · · Score: 1

      Good old Clive will turn up half way through the domination to sort out the plot with some unfeasibly useful technology. Bit like google sea really or is it - nooo I have lost my mind.

      --
      On a long enough timeline. The survival rate for everyone drops to zero. Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club, 1996
  12. Privacy concerns by erroneus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Davy Jones, the ambassador for marine life, is citing privacy concerns and plans to protest this activity.

    I say, if they don't have anything to hide, they have nothing to be afraid of.

  13. What by bobwrit · · Score: 0

    what is there that warrents a map of the ocean other than oil? http://www.programers.co.nr/

    --
    -- (this is a sig) My Computer Programming Forumhttp://www.programers.co.nr/
  14. Topographic Survey dATA by RealErmine · · Score: 2, Funny

    Survey Point 1, Sea Level ..... 0 Meters

    Survey Point 2, Sea Level ..... 0 Meters

    Survey Point 3, Sea Level ..... 0 Meters

    Survey Point 4, Sea Level ..... 0 Meters

    Survey Point 5, Sea level ..... 0.2 Meters (note: shark)

    --
    Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
    1. Re:Topographic Survey dATA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, this needs to be said... I am so tired of the bloody "Redundant" moderation being used wrongly. Seriously. It is NOT meant as a synonym for "-1 Stupid". Quit using it that way.

    2. Re:Topographic Survey dATA by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      You know, this needs to be said... I am so tired of the bloody moderation being used wrongly. Seriously. Dont forgot to meta moderate ppl

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  15. Let's get this out of the way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no Atlantis, folks.

  16. What's the use by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    Aside for fun and searching the Titanic and the Atlantis, what's the use of it? I mean, it's not that we will able to find the nearest Starbucks or get directions underwater. Why not use that cash to improve the streets and imagery on the earth part?

    1. Re:What's the use by njcoder · · Score: 1

      Why not use that cash to improve the streets and imagery on the earth part? Because fish and giant squid can't sue you over privacy concerns.
    2. Re:What's the use by genner · · Score: 1

      Yes but hippies can still protest on their behalf.

  17. Re:Google needs to work getting images and map dat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm always amazed at Google's ability to hire an insane number of talented engineers and do almost nothing worthwhile with them. Outside of advertising the company has absolutely no direction.

  18. Re:Google needs to work getting images and map dat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They updated the maps of my neighborhood a couple of weeks ago. I can actually see the trees that were planted a couple of years ago in my yard now.

  19. All together now! by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 4, Funny


    We all live in a google submarine
    google submarine, google submarine
    We all live in a google subarmine
    google submarine, google submarine

    As we live a life of ease (A life of ease)
    Everyone of us (Everyone of us) has all we need (Has all we need)
    Sky of blue (Sky of blue) and sea of green (Sea of green)
    In our google (In our google) submarine (Submarine, ha, ha)

  20. ARRGGHHH! Mates, there be treasure down there! by rts008 · · Score: 1

    We'll find Davey Jones' Locker yet with this and all be rich! RICH I say!

    Or, failing that, we can search for submarines lurking under the waves.

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    1. Re:ARRGGHHH! Mates, there be treasure down there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nessie is in for one hell of a surprise.

    2. Re:ARRGGHHH! Mates, there be treasure down there! by myth_of_sisyphus · · Score: 1

      Especially seeing as how she lives in a LAKE.

    3. Re:ARRGGHHH! Mates, there be treasure down there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Loch.

  21. make that map of the ocean FLOOR by jpellino · · Score: 1

    ...otherwise compared to keeping up with the RT 3d ocean surface, slashdotting a data server would be a drop in the ocean. literally.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  22. Let's imagine by redcaboodle · · Score: 1

    Instead of the Google Truck, there'd be a Google submarine taking pictures and some sort of slimy fish would probably sue them for taking pictures of it's backreef.

    I'm looking forward to Google Oceans. Sounds interesting.

    --
    -- Put crudely, the world is an extremely large problem instance. (Russel/Norvig Artificial Intelligence)
  23. Science and Google tools by Lord+Satri · · Score: 2, Informative

    Google continues to crank out new services, products, APIs, tools, and more. It's really quite staggering, but they do have the cash and brains to do it. But the investments they make are huge. I'm talking about money, time and brainpower. Working within the geospatial domain (a blend of GIS, remote sensing, GPS, virtual globes, webmapping and much more) and running a website about it, clearly the "newcomers" (mainly Google, Microsoft and Yahoo) with what has been often called neogeography are making serious inroads in traditional GIS software providers such as ESRI. (rejoice /. users, open source is also making serious inroads there too)

    The thing is, neogeography *is* useful and efficient for many tasks. Not everybody needs "a real" powerful GIS to visualize and analyse geodata. That's why I can believe this rumored Google Ocean will be attractive to many oceanography scientists (as well to hobbyists, of course). See this recent article named "Google Earth, GIS, and the Great Divide: A new and simple method for sharing paleontological data"
  24. I wonder what bathymetry they're using. by MROD · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hmm.. I wonder if they'll be using the Smith & Sandwell satellite derived bathymetry or ship-track data....

    Anything better than 5 degree per pixel would be scientifically useful.. but I doubt that they'll have very high definition coverage... and I also doubt they'll be filling in the huge holes in the ship-track coverage.

    The surface of Mars has been mapped in higher detail than the depths of the ocean and we are still guessing at the numbers of sea-mounts in the Pacific.

    --

    Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
    1. Re:I wonder what bathymetry they're using. by MROD · · Score: 1

      Oops! The referred article made most of my points. Oh well. At least the reporter talked to the two main researchers who have generated the best synthesis of data so far.

      --

      Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
  25. Re:Google needs to work getting images and map dat by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

    I'd like to know their update policy. I bought a house over a year ago. At the time Google Maps showed the land as being just a field, even though it had had streets on it for a while. A few months ago they updated the satellite image but only to the time when the roads were being excavated but before they were paved. However, Street View shows my house after I moved in. I can't figure it out.

    --
    Stop Global Warming!
    Just say no to irreversible processes!
  26. Red Route One by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Well, in The Hunt for Red October the Soviet Union had accurate charts and the US Navy didn't. I'd imagine the Soviet Navy might be upset that all the US has to do now is google Red Route One.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Red Route One by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Satellite imaging has grown up considerably since then. Also, that was a book. And then a movie. And none of it ever happened.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Red Route One by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Or the government's said it never happened.

      This is slashdot, not enough paranoia and you get kicked out!

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    3. Re:Red Route One by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Or the government's said it never happened.

      If you had seen the movie that we're lampooning, you would know that the last two lines of the introductory text are ever happened.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  27. Will it show the Trash Vortex? by klek · · Score: 1

    I hope that they will be able to offer satellite and 3D imagery of the gigantic plastic-trash gyre north of Hawaii. And anyway, aren't there other trash gyres in the oceans? Will they be able to provide real-time ocean vehicle tracking? Science buoys? Locations of marine accidents? The nearest pizza delivery to your port-of-call? Hurricane tracking? Atlantis? . Klek -- .Sig, munde, froid.

  28. Re:Google needs to work getting images and map dat by Helios1182 · · Score: 1

    Google's business plan: 1. Hire talented people to work on interesting projects 2. Offer free, useful tools to users to get them to your site 3. Show the users advertisements 4. Make a ton of money and still look like a good guy It seems to be working.

  29. Here's what you can do with this: by xx01dk · · Score: 1

    There are many uses for such a service. Here's just a few off the top of my head:

    -Under-water cable management

    -Shipwreck locator

    -Points of interest for study (black smokers, volcanoes, rifts)

    -Biologic tracking data (in 3D)

    -Current tracking data (in 3D)

    -The aforementioned oil industry uses

    I'm guessing Google would release a lo-rez free version to the general public and then license a high-rez version to corporations (and government) like it does with Google Earth. I didn't really RTFA--you don't really have to with a title like that--so I apologize if any of this was mentioned there. It just seemed like there were a lot of "What is this good for?" posts. I, for one, am looking forward to such a service.

    Cheers~

    --
    There is simply too much glass..
    1. Re:Here's what you can do with this: by johannesg · · Score: 1

      I can already count the rooftiles on my house using Google Earth. Are you telling me there is a version that is even more high-res?

      And you are forgetting one important use: it is *FUN* to look around the worlds' oceans!

    2. Re:Here's what you can do with this: by xx01dk · · Score: 1

      Nope! Like I said, I am eagerly awaiting this product.

      --
      There is simply too much glass..
  30. it would have uses... by casper75 · · Score: 1

    I don't think it's a waste of money at all- I think it's a great idea. It just doesn't have as much immediate use to the average internet user.

    I mean, maybe we can't use this map to get driving directions or whatever, but what if marine biologists create mash-ups that show migration patterns for marine life or something? That would be worthwhile.

  31. Since they have a flight simulator built in by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1

    Will they be adding a submarine simulator?

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  32. At this rate by unity100 · · Score: 1

    in just 5 or so years google will start mapping our butts.

    1. Re:At this rate by redcaboodle · · Score: 1

      in just 5 or so years google will start mapping our butts.

      If they start driving a photo truck over mine I will sue them. Either that or build a toll booth. Whatever seems more profitable.

      --
      -- Put crudely, the world is an extremely large problem instance. (Russel/Norvig Artificial Intelligence)
    2. Re:At this rate by dinodriver · · Score: 1

      And then five years after that they'll finally take gmail out of beta. Four years and counting...

  33. No divers' comments? by dindi · · Score: 1

    Hmm... well while that is interesting (or not) for the masses, I am very excited about that.
    As a diver (recreational) I am really curious if this will cover only deep oceans or maybe even close to shore locations. While there are enough dive places in Costa Rica (where I live) to dive every weekend on a different place, you quickly realize that a certain dive shop is usually limited to 10-12 sites tops. That makes you think of hiring the fisherman, getting on the friend's boat with a GPS and starting to do beach dives. Anyway even with a bunch of GPS coordinates in my old Garmin you might just hit empty sand pads, endless depths and other surprises. Besides that, beach dives without a coast guard are a nightmare here. Most beaches are surfing only (meaning DO NOT SWIM THERE OR YOU DIE).

    Anyway ... that is why I am really stoked about this and wonder what resolution and what regions will be available.

    Any divers with any thoughts on that?

    1. Re:No divers' comments? by AgentPaper · · Score: 1
      +1, although I'm a sport fisherwoman with a sometime interest in diving. I'd LOVE to have an accurate, easily accessible map of reefs, shoals, deep holes and other near-shore features, particularly for fishing travel. Most of the same places that interest divers also interest fisherpeople, for a lot of the same reasons - they have easily accessible, unique bottom structure that attracts interesting fish.

      Bring on the Google Oceans maps!

      --
      First rule of trauma: Bleeding always stops.
    2. Re:No divers' comments? by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

      In the US, NOAA has had fairly good resolution data available for most of the coastline. Unfortunately, it is not in the most "user friendly" format. To say that a different way, I was looking for some possible diving spots* and spent an hour trying to make heads or tails of the search data.

      Searchability is Google's strong point, so I expect this will be a vast improvement. Some inland data would be nice, but I can't imaging the two man-made lakes near my house would be indexed any time this century.

      -ellie

      * Hard contacts in less than 200ft/66M not in a major shipping lane.

  34. It's actually correct by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    Hat's off to Google == Hat is off to Google == [My] hat is off to Google.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:It's actually correct by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Oh, alright, if you say so. Don't skip the pronoun next time, you lazy bastard!

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    2. Re:It's actually correct by severoon · · Score: 1

      <super nazi>Actually...hats off is typically intoned as a command, as in, [Take your] hats off to Bob for his wonderful accomplishment!</super nazi>

      This expression isn't intended to passively describe a situation, it's intended to encourage action...specifically, figurative recognition, and that makes the use of the possessive apostrophe incorrect. Not that I much care, it's just you guys were talking about it and I couldn't bear to sit by and see misinformation abound.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    3. Re:It's actually correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hat's off to Google == Hat is off to Google == [My] hat is off to Google. Mate, you're just digging a deeper hole for yourself ...
  35. yes by unity100 · · Score: 1

    one could make huge money with such a butt that can handle a truck

  36. Smart projection by rpp3po · · Score: 1

    I'm still amazed sometimes how the google guys map the surface of a more or less flat thing like our world onto a ball. It confused me at first, but then I realized how smart that was. Instead of scrolling from east to west and the whole way back I can just turn the ball across the western border and be instantly there. I have been told that also most pilots also assume our world to be a ball when doing navigation as it supposed to make math easier.

  37. First Thing First by oloron · · Score: 0

    ok, So don't get Google Ocean confused with "Google Ocean" ... check

  38. I'm interested in the US Navy's response by QuantumFlux · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, high-resolution bathymetry is considered some of the most highly classified data the US Navy has. Many people and organizations over the years have tried to access that data and been told that it is protected due to unspecified national security concerns.

    OTOH, the kind of data that is easily available with Google Earth was once the exclusive domain of agencies such as NRO...

    1. Re:I'm interested in the US Navy's response by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      Well the UK Military is less protective over the information its bathymetry generates. The UK government organisation that does sea mapping is a trading fund of the Ministry of Defence and if you want a submarine map, buy one from them - http://www.hydro.gov.uk/

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
  39. Can we finish New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first? Still a bunch of highish then low res patches..

  40. Google Sketchup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, look! I just made a fish in Google Sketchup. It looks just like a two-level house.

    -- Marcio

  41. Perhaps... by imyy4u2 · · Score: 1

    But I am more concerned about them pulling into my underwater driveway and photographing my underwater house.

    Or...2010, breaking news: Google periscope spotted in homeowner's toilet taking pictures of "uncharted territory."