Slashdot Mirror


EV71 Outbreak In China Sparks Fears For Olympics

OMNIpotusCOM writes "CNN is reporting an outbreak of Enterovirus 71 (or EV71), that has affected more than 3700 children and killed over 20, is creating concern for the visitors and athletes expected for the Beijing Olympics in August. The virus can cause 'poliolike paralysis,' according to the article."

199 comments

  1. Conspiracy comments in... by Infonaut · · Score: 2, Funny

    5... 4... 3...

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by rob1980 · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is clearly Tibet's doing! Curse you, Dalai Lama!

    2. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Funny

      You'd better be careful about that or you just might reincarnate as a Dali llama!

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    3. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I just think it's perfect timing to rain on China's parade. With their persecution of Tibetans and all the other crap they are doing in this world, something that will keep the world away from their self-aggrandizing Olympic spectacle will serve them right.

      And it's poetic justice that the country most responsible for launching the world's illnesses due to their lack of consideration for any sort of cleanliness in their farm animal world, and the constant exposure of humans to animal excrement and vice versa, should have some new outbreak scare away the tourists.

      Personally, I can't understand why anyone would want to visit such a dirty country. If it isn't human filth, it's animal filth, or industrial pollution.

      China is a dirty backward country and the world should shun it.

    4. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by Vectronic · · Score: 1

      3720 / 1,321,851,888 = 0.0000028% chance of getting EV71... thats probably less than the risk of the plane you (don't) get there by crashing... which, will kill you, your kids, friends, that girl you bumped into in the line-up...

      According to the article ("Adults' well-developed immune systems usually can fend off the virus, but children are vulnerable to it, according to the CDC.") seems to only effect children...

      Wouldn't consider it conspiracy worthy, but definitely propaganda ("icky don't go there - stay in the US where its 'safe") sort material...

    5. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The sad thing about that comment is that several months ago China allowed US beef back into the country after some debacle early on. Less than a month after the allowed it they turned around and banned it again because of the levels of spinal material (or some such thing) in the beef. They were afraid of BSE (mad cow disease) and their levels that they wanted were way lower than what the US or even Canada accepted, so US beef is banned again (though you can get it fairly easily through other channels). While I have no example of what you're saying being true or false, it would be very ironic if it was true with the BSE story in mind.

    6. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by pizzach · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dali is a sheep, not a llama.

      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    7. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's purely food safety related, there isn't any sort of trade politics involved at all.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well sure, Chinese beef doesn't have all this nasty spinal crap. After all, Chinese beef is made entirely of plastic and styrofoam.

    9. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by PiSkyHi · · Score: 1
      I haven't eaten US beef, but I would say the experience I've had with meat in China is a very positive one - the turnover for meat is high. It's quality is actually pretty good on the whole - I wouldn't be surprised if its quality is above that of the US in general.

      Fish maybe a little riskier.

      I don't eat McDonalds.

    10. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is clearly Tibet's doing! Curse you, Dalai Lama!


      Nah, Rev Wright says this is the white man's way of taking revenge against the evil yellow hordes who stole their jerbs!
    11. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell was parent post modded (-1, Flamebait)? Mod responsibly, people, and lay off the 'tussin.

    12. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by vikstar · · Score: 1

      Yep, but from what I've seen of CNN, they're not to bad with propaganda. If it was from FOX I would burst-out laughing.

      --
      The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
    13. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by vikstar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, god, no... no god, please help me. I used "to" where I should've used "too". If I put my ear to the ground I can already hear the spelling/grammar cavalry charging.

      --
      The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
    14. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Karma's a bitch, I guess. When you treat people and animals like crap, and keep them in bad conditions, things like this are more likely to happen.

    15. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the Dalai Lama can reincarnate as the Dalai Lama. Otherwise he wouldn't be considered a Tibetan Lama.

    16. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by Squalish · · Score: 2, Interesting
      --
      People in Soviet Russia, however, appear to be afflicted with amusing juxtapositions of the aforementioned situation
    17. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by Nikker · · Score: 1

      3720 / 1,321,851,888 = 0.0000028% chance of getting EV71

      I know you're new here but if you divide the number of people in a group by every one in the country that does not give you the possibility of some one joining that group.

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    18. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by PiSkyHi · · Score: 1
      There are many places in the world where it is inadvisable to drink tap water. I come from Australia, now living in Beijing. I would put Beijing's tap water on a par with Adelaide's.

      I don't drink either of them.

    19. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by Squalish · · Score: 1

      Those are river/lake water samples. Where fish live.

      Fish that bioaccumulate fat-soluble toxins in their flesh.

      --
      People in Soviet Russia, however, appear to be afflicted with amusing juxtapositions of the aforementioned situation
    20. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by Curtman · · Score: 1

      If it isn't human filth, it's animal filth, or industrial pollution.

      Funny, I said the same thing last time I was in L.A.
    21. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      3720 / 1,321,851,888 = 0.0000028% chance of getting EV71. Actually... that'd be 0.00025% of the population who has it, which is in no way indicative of your chances of getting it.
    22. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by baggins2001 · · Score: 1

      I thought upon initially reading it, that is was Bush and the CIA. If you can't make them boycott, then get them to boycott on their own.
      But then I put my tinfoil hat on and realized that Bush doesn't give a rat's ass about Tibet. Tibet is too small to pull this off and too passive.
      So whose behind this?

      --
      He who said 1,000,000 monkeys on 1,000,000 typewriters would eventually type the great novel, never saw an AOL chat room
    23. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes , you spell like an US a anti-immigration protestor...their not good spellers :>)

    24. Re:Conspiracy comments in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ja, this virus is clearly the work of the dastardly CIA, the Dalai Lama, the WHO, the Japanese, and the Catholic Church, for good measure. The whole affair is clearly aimed at besmirching China's reputation and insulting the glorious Chinese people!

  2. That's okay... by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...it only affects Tibetans {ducks head}

    1. Re:That's okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Those poor Tibetan ducks!

    2. Re:That's okay... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      You quack me up

    3. Re:That's okay... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Actually it is the Chinese who like to eat Duck.

    4. Re:That's okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no u

    5. Re:That's okay... by iggymanz · · Score: 2, Funny

      you know how to eat a duck, don't you. put a leg over each of your ears and start licking.

    6. Re:That's okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're implying that others don't like to eat duck?

  3. In Soviet Russia... by InSovietRussiaTroll · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The party bugs you!

  4. Should I be scared ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... of a whopping 0.5% chance of death?

    1. Re:Should I be scared ... by MisterBlueSky · · Score: 1

      Yes. You should. Especially you. The rest of us.. Nah. Not really.

    2. Re:Should I be scared ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shouldn't be worried that you might die, but you should be worried that people will die.

    3. Re:Should I be scared ... by mrbluze · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You shouldn't be worried that you might die, but you should be worried that people will die. I know! Thousands of people are dying around the world every day and nobody seems to be doing anything about it!. It's a travesty!
      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    4. Re:Should I be scared ... by piojo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Should I be scared... of a whopping 0.5% chance of death? That's probably a hundred or a thousand times riskier than anything you've ever done.
      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    5. Re:Should I be scared ... by Kopiok · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Think he's ever been in a car?

    6. Re:Should I be scared ... by piojo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Suppose that driving carries a 0.005% chance of death, and that a person drives an average of 2.5 times per day for 10 years. This person has a 45% chance of dying in a car accident during those years. Because this calculation is wrong by more than one order of magnitude, driving must actually carry less than 0.0005% of death. I rest my case.

      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    7. Re:Should I be scared ... by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Care to show your math? Looks like rather egregious misuse of units to me.

    8. Re:Should I be scared ... by DimmO · · Score: 0

      everyone has a 100% chance of death, so 0.5% meh.

    9. Re:Should I be scared ... by ixtapa · · Score: 1

      Should I be scared... of a whopping 0.5% chance of death? One of your 200 friends/family members should be.
    10. Re:Should I be scared ... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      This is flawwed reasoning.

      If your risk of death is 0.005% for every time you drive, independent of all other times you drive, and you drive 9,131.25 times.

      Then on average, you will have died 0.45 times.

      But in fact the risk was always 0.005% for every time, and the risk was never 45%.

      The assumption of independence is unreasonable, and there is no basis for assuming the risk is 0.005% chance of death _each_ time you drive.

      This puts taking two 5-mile trips a day, via city driving at the same level as taking two 200-mile trips a day, including city driving, daily interstate and city driving during rush-hour, etc.

    11. Re:Should I be scared ... by piojo · · Score: 1

      Care to show your math? Looks like rather egregious misuse of units to me. Kopiok implied that I was incorrect, and that getting in a car is not 100 or 1000 times safer than a 0.5% chance of death. I supposed that driving is merely 100x safer: a 0.005% chance of death (probability = 0.00005). Suppose a person takes this chance 2.5 times per day, 365 days, for ten years:
      0.00005 * 2.5 * 365 * 10 = 0.45625 = 45%

      If this were true, most Americans wouldn't live to be 40, they would die in car accidents. I claim that this percentage is dramatically wrong, and that driving is much, much safer than I just supposed. Probably 50,000 times safer than the original "0.5% chance of dying".
      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    12. Re:Should I be scared ... by maelfius · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I think you're doing the math wrong. It's not simply 10*365*2.5*0.005, which does equate 45.625 (the 45% chance). Again, this is not simple adding the percentage up, we need to delve into the world of statistics.

      It is more akin to 0.005% chance each time you drive, independent of the number of times you are driving. On average, you'd see 0.005% death (using your numbers) across many many many times driving, not simply hit the equivalent of 100% chance eventually.

      I believe the math works out to be something more akin to working as a binomial probability distribution instead of simply additively. The percentage that a person will die while driving, over 9125 trials (number of times driving in 10 years, 2.5 times a day) will still be 0.005 (or approach 0.005).

      This is because each trial is independent of each other, and cannot be equated to a lottery with a fixed number of entrants.

      You can state that a single person's chance of dieing in a car is higher by driving more often because there are more events (trials) that take place. Each of these trials will net the same (or similar) results.

      Obviously the equation falls apart as soon as the subject dies (as there will be no further trials).

      I can't seem to drum up the math equations behind this at the moment. It has been a long day and I'm struggling to get back into thinking stats at the moment. But you get the idea, I'm sure.

      --
      Information is not Knowledge.
    13. Re:Should I be scared ... by maelfius · · Score: 1

      You are doing the math wrong. It's not additive. See Below (the posts inc. my comment). Man I wish my math wasn't rusty at the moment.

      --
      Information is not Knowledge.
    14. Re:Should I be scared ... by piojo · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I ought to eat my shoe... I really shouldn't try to do math in public...

      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    15. Re:Should I be scared ... by maelfius · · Score: 1

      In retro spec, to prove my point, it would mean that EVERYBODY would die while driving after less than 10 years years. Even moving the decimal points out to 0.00005, you're stating that it takes a mere 20 years puts you at a 91% chance to die from driving. Moving out to 25 years shows that it takes ~18000 times driving to ensure death. I don't like that thought, I drive pretty damn often and have used up a fair share of my "allotment"

      --
      Information is not Knowledge.
    16. Re:Should I be scared ... by piojo · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're right, as was the poster above you. My math was dead wrong. But this isn't:

      Driving 9125 times with a 0.005% chance of death each time, the probability of living is
      0.99995^9125 = 0.63

      So, you've got a 37% chance of dying. This is obviously still not the correct percentage. If we say that there is only a 0.0005% chance of dying, the calculation yields a 4.4% chance of death. Still too much. So, even though I suck at math, driving is more than 1000x safer than an activity which causes 0.5% death.

      And you're right that I'm making gross simplifications about what types of driving I'm considering, but the original AC post said "I wonder if he's ever stepped into a car?"

      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    17. Re:Should I be scared ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      driving must actually carry less than 0.0005% of death. If that's your odds of dying when you're in a car, you obviously drive too slow.
    18. Re:Should I be scared ... by jlarocco · · Score: 1

      The assumption of independence is unreasonable, and there is no basis for assuming the risk is 0.005% chance of death _each_ time you drive.

      This puts taking two 5-mile trips a day, via city driving at the same level as taking two 200-mile trips a day, including city driving, daily interstate and city driving during rush-hour, etc.

      I agree it'd be pretty limited in use, but why couldn't such a chance be calculated? Something like "These 100 people took 100000 arbitrary car trips over a 365 day period and 5 of them died in car accidents."

      Obviously you couldn't apply it to a particular trip, as individual results would vary, but I think it'd be reasonable to use for an "average" person making an arbitrary trip. In other words, you could say "There's a 0.005% chance of dying in a car crash while going on a trip", but not "There's a 0.005% chance of dying in a car crash on this trip."

      I'd be interested to know if/why that's not possible.

    19. Re:Should I be scared ... by bonhomme_de_neige · · Score: 4, Informative

      His/her maths is almost correct (i.e. wrong, but not enough to make his point invalid).

      The calculation above doesn't take into account the fact that to die in a car crash on your second day (e.g. 5th drive), implies you already didn't die on the first day, so the actual chance of that is p*(1-p)^4, where p = 0.005% or whatever.

      A quick spreadsheet exercise projecting this for 9125 drives (10 years @ 2.5 drives per day) shows the probability of death during the 10 years is 36.6%.

      Another way to approach the problem that doesn't need either a spreadsheet or a geometric progression trick is to say that the probability of dying in this way during the 10 years is (1 - probability of not dying in that time). The probability of doing all that driving and surviving is (1 - p)^(9125), which = 63.4% when p = 0.005. (1 - 63.4%) = 36.6% giving the same answer as above.

      However this doesn't change the fact that piojo's argument is 100% correct that the chance of death per drive must average lower than 0.0005%, as the 36% per 10 years rate is way too high.

      --
      "Why are you watching the washing machine?"
      "I love entertainment, as long as it's clean"
    20. Re:Should I be scared ... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Primarily because all trips are fundamentally different.

      The origin is different, the driver is different, the destination is different, the distance is different, the time is different, and the vehicle is different.

      There are many factors that can make the percentages observed over thousands of trips invalid for the next trips.

      There's not reason to assume there is any rough consistency in the risk associated with various trips.

    21. Re:Should I be scared ... by piojo · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely correct (and I'm not). However, see my post below, I redid the math, and I think it's right (the numbers are different, but it still supports my conclusion that driving is pretty safe).

      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    22. Re:Should I be scared ... by MurphyZero · · Score: 1

      In Florida, the state estimates an average of roughly 1.65 deaths per 100 million miles driven. Different states will have different numbers and obviously with an average, it will include many riskier events (drunk driving, street racing, etc.) along with your typical sunday drive probably being below this value. You could then pop the values in and get an estimate for a lifetime risk, but the value changes every year (it's been generally going down with time) http://www.flhsmv.gov/reports/crash_facts.html

      --
      Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
    23. Re:Should I be scared ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In retro spec

      Some sort of bell-bottomed specification? But in retrospect, you should have ignored my post.

    24. Re:Should I be scared ... by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      ... of a whopping 0.5% chance of death?

      Yeah. Those 200-1 shots never come in. The odds of that happening must be millions to one.

    25. Re:Should I be scared ... by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

      So if each person has 200 people that their death will directly affect, and some disease has a 1 in 200 chance of killing people, how many people will be affected by said disease?

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    26. Re:Should I be scared ... by rootpassbird · · Score: 1

      A quick spreadsheet exercise projecting this for 9125 drives (10 years @ 2.5 drives per day) shows the probability of death during the 10 years is 36.6%. Doesn't this sound like it's picked up from a secret diary of a BOFH at Google..? :-)
      --
      Hackers have long memories. It works both ways.
    27. Re:Should I be scared ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't ever try to do math on slashdot. Every idiot buffoon will challenge you on it even if it is 100% correct. You will never convince the idiots here. They will say you are wrong even if your being incorrect means that 95% of Americans should be dead by car wrecks by now. They simply can't wrap their minds around numbers here. Don't try it. You'll type yourself silly arguing with the idiots. Your math looks good to me, though.

    28. Re:Should I be scared ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm no mathematician, but I didn't think odds on an open ended calculation like this accumulated. If you were certain to die in a car crash then they might. But basically, as you're not, you have an 0.005 chance of dying on any given day. Therefore in a period of 10 years you have a 0.005 chance of having died on any given day. If you lived for the 10 years it just means on each day you were amongst the over 99 percent who didn't die. This doesn't prejudice your chances the following day - you still have a 0.005 chance. Because you were constantly subjected to these odds does not mean that they stack up - each ride is an individual gamble. But then maybe I didn't understand my maths teacher

  5. and china will make the pro Tibetan people get thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and china will make the pro Tibetan people get this.

  6. 28 days later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    i'd hate to see what happens 28 days later

    1. Re:28 days later by Chutulu · · Score: 1, Funny

      zombies run like Carl Lewis?

  7. Bird Flu 2.0. by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 1

    That's all this is. Wake me when it has killed off more than a tiny pin prick of some nation's population. Then we may worry.

    1. Re:Bird Flu 2.0. by Ian+Alexander · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it make more sense to deal with it while the death toll is only 20 people and not, say, 20% of China's population? 20 people is still a _lot_ of people dead.

    2. Re:Bird Flu 2.0. by maxume · · Score: 1

      But they're CHILDREN.

      Anybody who found this comment excessively callous or crass, please see the number of pediatric influenza deaths in the United States on this page:

      http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/index.htm

      If you look at this chart:

      http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/weeklyarchives2007-2008/IPD17.htm

      you will see that it is not uncommon for their to be 15-20 child flu deaths in a two week period.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Bird Flu 2.0. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue is that when flus like this do mutate into a form that is deadly an transmits readily from human to human it will be far too late to stop it. Note, I said when, not if. Maybe not this outbreak, maybe not avian, maybe not the 20 next outbreaks, but eventually it will happen. It has happened before you know... Granted it was a while since last time, but there isn't any reason to suspect it cannot occur again, and even in the hypothetical situation that you can come up with a vaccine within a year or two, that doesn't help much given that flu outbreaks can hit the entire globe within a few weeks time.

      You would also have to deal with the logistics of trying to deal with this occurring in a world population of several billion. Put it this way, just for a moment try to consider the consequences if HIV transmitted just slightly easier than it does. Consider what would happen if it could transmit through saliva or snot as an example.

      You ought to be pretty darn certain something like that cannot happen before ridiculing concerns like these, because by the time we know for sure if an outbreak like this is indeed THAT BAD then it will be far too late.

    4. Re:Bird Flu 2.0. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for those links. I have had many debates about the intelligence of the Chicken Pox vaccine, and people arguing for it are always trying to claim that it is super dangerous. CDC links are always good for backing up an argument.

    5. Re:Bird Flu 2.0. by Nullav · · Score: 1

      Bird flu is a lot of speculation. ("This thing might mutate and spread from birds to humans, and then there's a tiny chance that it may also spread to other humans.") On the other hand, a virus doesn't have to mutate (much?) to travel on planes. Also, considering the population density in China, I have a feeling it'll kill a few more than the 20 it has.

      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
    6. Re:Bird Flu 2.0. by maxume · · Score: 1
      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  8. When tourists return to their home contries... by Picass0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... they could trigger a nice little pandemic.

    Sweet dreams.

    1. Re:When tourists return to their home contries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially since people will be traveling all closed up in shiny tubes with wings for nice long flights. Perfect incubation and exposure environment.

      Oh, and all of those connecting flights where people exposed on one plane can get on another and expose new people if it is really virulent.

      And I'm sure all the Chinese food vendors will practice good hygiene and be washing their hands after they pee in the street, take a dump, blow their nose, clean a dead chicken, or whatever else they may do in between serving all the thousands of Olympic attendees that might visit their restaurant or vending cart.

      This could be a lot of fun to watch. Or not.

    2. Re:When tourists return to their home contries... by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      Yes, those wings always make long flights so much more pleasant. Landings too.

    3. Re:When tourists return to their home contries... by kripkenstein · · Score: 1

      ... they could trigger a nice little pandemic. I know! Because we've never had people from all across the world go to other places around the world. This is something totally new, a completely novel vector for disease!
    4. Re:When tourists return to their home contries... by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      OMG Polio!

      Sorry, that doesn't worry me one bit.

    5. Re:When tourists return to their home contries... by rootpassbird · · Score: 1

      pandemic == panic epidemic
      oldest, most passionate, never-ending infatuation of North American media ( RHS of equation above)

      --
      Hackers have long memories. It works both ways.
  9. That's okay by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sure the Chinese have some sort of perfectly safe medicine for this.

    1. Re:That's okay by v1 · · Score: 1

      ... and it's either lead-coated, or lead-based, depending on the level of effectiveness required.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:That's okay by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      Yeah... probably lead paint coated.

    3. Re:That's okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just hope there are enough rhinoceroses for that medicine.

    4. Re:That's okay by Nemo's+Night+Sky · · Score: 1

      Yea but what happens when it spreads to India and Taiwan? If it hits Taiwan its practically already in the U.S. Perhaps your baby just died from a lead contaminated chinese toy. I don't know. But talk like that found in the other posts in this thread are noting but counterproductive. If you really think the P.R.C. are bad men then do something to help instead of make quasi racist jokes. Here is a link to one of many possible ways to become involved.

    5. Re:That's okay by Twisted64 · · Score: 1

      I hear the next big thing is powdered Tibetan penis.

      --
      Consciousness is a myth. Trust me.
    6. Re:That's okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just hope there are enough rhinoceroses for that medicine. There aren't because every endangered species in China is an aphrodesiac. They don't have enough people over there because they kill all the little girls, so the dudes need to be horny more.
  10. Consideration by Narpak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess a gathering of people from all over the world, who stay for a while then go back home, does provide a certain degree of danger when it comes to spreading any type of contagious disease.

    1. Re:Consideration by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1

      Without doubt, I caught a nasty virus at the 2006 linux.conf.au. It was a norovirus and put me and about 50% of the delegates in recovery mode for about 4 days.

    2. Re:Consideration by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

      (Windows fanboy mode on)

      See? I always told you Linux does not protect you from catching a virus!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  11. Perspective Comments by mrbluze · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Killed 20 children. How many children are there in China? or Peking?

    How many car accidents were there, or murders. Who cares, basically.

    Nerd/News/Importance Factor Zero.

    --
    Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    1. Re:Perspective Comments by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right! I'm sure the virus won't spread any more, killing more children, or mutate in any way so as to make it resistant to treatment or affect adults. What a tool I was to think that may be possible. Here, hold my tinfoil hat, I'm not worthy to wear it any more.

    2. Re:Perspective Comments by kilgor · · Score: 0

      The first time my kids got sick with Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease was back when they were burning all those cows in England for Hoof-and-Mouth Disease. Being a new parent it scared the crap out of me and it took a bit for the Doctor to calm me down.

      With proper care, it's generally pretty harmless (even this EV71 strain). The biggest problems are really severe fever and dehydration. (It's also kinda gross.)

  12. Always China by The+Fanta+Menace · · Score: 1

    Why do these illnesses always spring up in China first? Is there a severe lack of hygiene there, or something?

    --
    -- Even if a god did exist, why the fsck should I worship it?
    1. Re:Always China by mrbluze · · Score: 1

      Why do these illnesses always spring up in China first? Is there a severe lack of hygiene there, or something?

      Have you ever heard of anyone eating at a Chinese restaurant and getting sick the next day? How many Chinese restaurants are there in China?

      I rest my case.

      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    2. Re:Always China by icegreentea · · Score: 1

      Probably a combination of less than North American standard of hygiene, as well as sheer probability. Pick a random person on Earth to infect with a zombie virus. 1/6th chance you'll end up with a mainland Chinese zombie.

    3. Re:Always China by v1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      virus crossover can occur when one species can be infected by viruses from more than one other species. Chickens can get avian type viruses. Humans can get human type viruses. Pigs, lucky them, can get some of both. And in china it's common to raise pigs and chickens together.

      Perfect breeding ground for avian-to-human crossover viruses. And crossover evolution works a lot faster than regular evolution.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    4. Re:Always China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do these illnesses always spring up in China first? Is there a severe lack of hygiene there, or something? Natures Population Control

      Need I say more.
    5. Re:Always China by rob1980 · · Score: 1

      One could also say the same of Indian restaurants. Shitting lava the next day is no laughing matter!

    6. Re:Always China by camperdave · · Score: 1

      And crossover evolution works a lot faster than regular evolution.

      I didn't know that. When I get home, I'm going to download CrossOver, and speed up my email.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    7. Re:Always China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably a combination of less than North American standard of hygiene, as well as sheer probability. Pick a random person on Earth to infect with a zombie virus. 1/6th chance you'll end up with a mainland Chinese zombie. Natures Population Control

      Need I say more!
    8. Re:Always China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what you did there.

    9. Re:Always China by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      Pffft... Weakling I'm not worried until the person 4 stalls down from feel like he's sitting in a furnace.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    10. Re:Always China by Cheapy · · Score: 1

      Well, when you have a good chunk of the world's population, things will tend to happen to you first.

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    11. Re:Always China by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Pretty much. Peasants live with farm animals in the same house. They're not too picky about cleanliness. Going out into the countryside is like taking a trip in a time machine. You go further back in time the farther you get from an urban area.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    12. Re:Always China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...

      [The_Fanta_Menace] Why is there a larger incidence of disease in the world's most populous country?

      Difficult to tell, really.

    13. Re:Always China by Nemo's+Night+Sky · · Score: 1

      population density

  13. Here we go... by Tastecicles · · Score: 0

    Let's pander to maternal instincts and do whatever the liberal crowd want "in the name of the children!"

    That's all this is. Next up: athletes refuse to compete as UN surgeons warn of the contagious nature of this bug and they don't want to leave them at home to watch their parents on TV from the other side of the planet... ...and that's my conspiracy theory.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  14. What could go wrong by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So we'll soon have hundreds of thousands of people from all over the world traveling into a very densely populated area with a deadly virus which has no vaccine available (which hardy matters since the people would be unlikely to get vaccinated) and then all roughly at the same time traveling back across the globe. Add to this China's documented sanitary and even pollution problems. And a government with a history of hiding facts that might impact it financially or even just embarrass it. What could go wrong? Lets just pretend we didn't see this coming and act surprised when the pandemic hits.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:What could go wrong by McNihil · · Score: 1

      Yup... it's time to go fishin'

      I'll be back in... oh... how about 2032?

      Gotta fix all those UNIX date issues... well at least that is my pension plan.

    2. Re:What could go wrong by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      So we'll soon have hundreds of thousands of people from all over the world traveling into a very densely populated area

      This has been a problem in very rural China. Likely there will be few tourists or Olympic travelers even remotely exposed.

      with a deadly virus which has no vaccine available

      possibly true to very low values of "deadly" - it's fairly mild in adults.

      Add to this China's documented sanitary [problems]

      in rural villages, yes, this is a issue for those living there ...

      and even pollution problems.

      Nice non sequitur there. Although this is likely to be more of a health issue for persons traveling to the Olympics.

      And a government with a history of hiding facts that might impact it financially or even just embarrass it.

      You mean the US? Oh, I get it, you're talking about the Chinese government.

      What could go wrong? Lets just pretend we didn't see this coming and act surprised when the pandemic hits.

      FUD much? Take a deep breath, some Xanax and run back into your Lysol-coated tinfoil cage. You'll feel better.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:What could go wrong by hackingbear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      After the SARS outbreaks in 2003, China has been much more open on reporting outbreaks of transmissive diseases. The suppression of SARS taught them that openness would not cause panic but solve it. We just hope they apply the lesson during the Olympics and to other areas of governing.

    4. Re:What could go wrong by frovingslosh · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Your reassurance that this is limited to villages is pretty lame. Unless you want everyone to believe that all of the food that will be consumed at the Olympics will actually be produced in Beijing and not in those remote villages. I expect there to be a serious flow of food, people and viruses between the remote villages and Beijing.

      Your discounting of the deadliness of this virus is also not very reassuring. The percentage of deaths of those affected is high enough to cause me concern (perhaps even higher than the death rate of the Spanish Flu.). But that's far from the only problem. Those affected with polio like symptoms and other serious problems are likely to number far greater. And any statement that it is mild in adults should alarm any thoughtful person; how many adults who pick up the virus and only show a "mild" reaction will be likely to carry it back home, rather than wait out an extended stay in China? A "mild in adults but deadly in children and the elderly" virus is just the thing to cause a pandemic.

      You hit the nail on the head with the pollution issue. It is likely to be a health issue. And so anyone who does pick up the virus and show "mild" symptoms is even more likely to just attribute it to the pollution and not stay around the polluted city for an extended stay. So the virus spreads, but people can claim "Oh, I though I was just sick from the pollution". Gee, who could have seen this coming?

      Yea, the US government are real scum and villains too. Talk about off-topic. But I don't see how this makes China any better. I see very little chance that they will react properly if they find there is a growing problem, based on their past record and the loss of face that any health provisions during the Olympics would cause.

      There is FUD, and then there is common sense. Those who just dismiss all problems as the former lack the latter.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    5. Re:What could go wrong by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1
      Look at this CDC article concerning the 1988 EV71 outbreak in Taiwan. It is clear that this (and similar) viruses are responsible for epidemics but so far there is no evidence for any pandemic spread. These outbreaks have been temporally and geographically limited. An article in Medscape (registration required) quotes a New England Journal of Medicine editorial:

      Recent experience with EV71 epidemic disease also evokes a sense of déjà vu for those familiar with the history of poliomyelitis, he notes; 100 years ago, few had heard of the disease, and only a few geographically and temporally separate outbreaks had occurred over several decades in developing countries. "But over time, these outbreaks increased in frequency and size and ultimately evolved into the major epidemics that swept through cities in Northern Europe and North America in the first half of the 20th century.

      "Do the recent epidemics in Southeast Asia portend annual summertime outbreaks in North America and other regions that have thus far been spared large-scale outbreaks of neurotropic enterovirus 71 infection? Without a crystal ball, it would be presumptuous to make predictions," Dr. Modlin concludes. "However, if history is any guide, it would also be foolish not to be better prepared than we are now. It would be prudent to add enterovirus 71 to the list of emerging infections that threaten us, develop a plan to respond to an outbreak, and take the first steps toward developing a vaccine."

      This is about as alarming as I can find in the medical literature. It should be noted that there is no direct evidence that this polio-like pandemic has or is likely to occur - just that it's feasible from an virologic and epidemiological point of view. Clearly we shouldn't ignore it, but I don't think that this "threatens" the Olympics.
      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:What could go wrong by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Ah, whew! That cools things off. We don't have to worry about any pandemics, ever! And heck, why worry at strangling viruses in the crib when we can just ignore the problem and let them spread?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  15. This could crash the Olympics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember SARS? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SARS

    We had SARS in Toronto in 2003. It was a major problem. My wife's business relies on foreign visitors. She had zero business that year. Canadians were unwelcome in other countries no matter how far they lived from Toronto.

    The outbreak started in Asia in November 2002. My wife's business literally dropped to zero the following summer. It is too early to say what will happen with the Olympics but one possibility is that they could be completely cancelled. The Chinese will do anything to keep that from happening but they have to be very careful. If the rest of the world thinks China is covering something up, they will stay home.

  16. Jack Thompson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The virus can cause "poliolike paralysis" according to the article."
     
    Does the man know no bounds?

  17. John Titor... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ... was right after all!

    Torino was the last (summer) olympics of human history.

    But this is EV71's merit, not Tibet's merit!

    1. Re:John Titor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First thing I thought of too

  18. Forget Olympics, ISCA is in China this year by DrDitto · · Score: 1

    The International Symposium of Computer Architecture is in China next month. This is more relevant to slashdotters than the Olympics.

  19. Let's cancel the olympics by boyko.at.netqos · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Let's cancel the olympics.

    No, seriously.

    The Olympics exists for two purposes - to allow athletes to compete against others around the world for sport and to promote the idea of international competition taking the form of athletic events instead of warfare. To promote sport and to promote peace.

    In the case of the former, per-sport international athletics associations can more than supplant the role.

    In the case of the latter, no one can take a look at the bloody history of the 20th and early 21st centuries since the modern olympics were founded and believe that the Olympics has been terribly successful at promoting peace.

    Instead, what ends up is that every two years (now that they're staggered) there's a massive orgy of corruption and controversy; and from time to time we have to put up with someone like China or Nazi Germany hosting - or sometimes the U.S. will boycott Moscow or Moscow will boycott the U.S...

    I think it's time to get rid of the Olympics.

    --
    I used to work for NetQoS. I no longer do, but want to keep the excellent karma attached to this account.
    1. Re:Let's cancel the olympics by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      /signed

      It's become way too political, and it never was supposed to be. The main reason China was even chosen was politics, to show that they were 'coming out' into the world as a good citizen.

    2. Re:Let's cancel the olympics by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hello 1936? The Olympics have always been political. The torch run-around was invented by Hitler after all. He invented the pagentry and ran the flame through countries he tried to take over later.

      The Olympic torch run started out like a dog marking its territory.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    3. Re:Let's cancel the olympics by Ninjaesque+One · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But every few Olympics, we have someone like South Korea hosting, and dictatorships get weakened. Is South Korea an extreme? Perhaps. Are they an isolated case, and will they be an isolated case in the future? I think not.

      --
      Ninjas and pirates. How piquant.
    4. Re:Let's cancel the olympics by Viceroy+Potatohead · · Score: 1

      Just to be a pissant, and carry on your point in a much more extreme fashion (in a slightly Ambrose Bierce-y fashion):

      Olympics: An intermittent event which is used by highly evolved nations pretending they honour the value of each other's citizen, which lasts for a couple of weeks separated by long periods of the subjugation, dehumanisation, and murder of those same citizens. Not to be confused with treaties or peace accords, which lack the same level of athleticism.

    5. Re:Let's cancel the olympics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, seriously.

      Okay.

      The Olympics exists for two purposes...

      Wrong. The Olympics exists to generate a shitload of money. You say you're being serious and then you skip that? Sorry, but it's now deeply suspicious that you only want to include "facts" that back up your target argument.

      In the case of the latter, no one can take a look at the bloody history of the 20th and early 21st centuries since the modern olympics were founded and believe that the Olympics has been terribly successful at promoting peace.

      Promoting peace does NOT equal wiping out warfare. Actually promoting peace during periods of warfare is a fucking good idea. What's more, the Olympics may be rather good at it - consider what the same time period might have been like without it.

      I'm not a fan of the Olympics, but during these brief festivals worldwide mainstream attention is aware of other countries as something other than regular news reports about wars and economic crisis. We've got nothing else like that.

      I think it's time to get rid of the Olympics.

      No one is forcing you to attend. If enough people want a worldwide sports festival, let 'em do it. Compared to the vast majority of what organized groups of people do, it's one of the few good things.
    6. Re:Let's cancel the olympics by donweel · · Score: 1

      I agree, if the Greek for-fathers of the Olympics saw the circus show their creation has become they would be horrified. It's not supposed to be about money and politics and kicking people out of their homes. http://www.wtopnews.com/?nid=393&sid=1304256

      --
      Many a long talk since then I have had with the man in the moon; he had my confidence on the voyage. Joshua Slocum
    7. Re:Let's cancel the olympics by 2Bits · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's a first. You managed to invoke Godwin's law in the first post of a new thread. How is the conversation supposed to be carried on?

    8. Re:Let's cancel the olympics by Winckle · · Score: 1

      Godwin's law only applies when nazis aren't related. Since Hitler did in fact invent the torch running, h doesn't invoke the law.

    9. Re:Let's cancel the olympics by giminy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think this worldwide fellowship thing can be promoted in a way that doesn't require athletic red carpets, and doesn't implicitly piss somebody off.

      Amen to that. It used to be that olympic athletes held "amateur status," -- they weren't allowed to accept any form of payment for their sport. Jim Thorpe had his medals stripped because he got paid to play baseball in the *minor leagues*, which barely paid to put food on his table.

      Overcompetition killed the olympics. The Olympics used to basically be, "Bob the Carpenter happens to be good at shot-put, so let him represent our country as an average citizen." I'd honestly watch them if it were amateur athletes competing again -- it's fun to think that, with enough working out in my spare time, I too could be an olympic cyclist. Now it's just mega-million athletes wearing logos from a shoe manufacturer that uses slave labor to make the money...not exactly something to be proud of.

      --
      The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
    10. Re:Let's cancel the olympics by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      public money is going into a speed skating rink nobody will ever use again
      I agree. And curse the fsckers that built the Colosseum. What a waste of money that must have been.

      Seriously though, I'm not too keen on speed skating myself but I acknowledge the level of commitment and achievement. Imagine doing 50 Mph. On a bike. And then reconsider.
      You need top drawer stuff to push the limits. (How much money would you spend on a PC that has the best cost/performance ratio? Now build a system that is 10% faster and recalculate costs.)

      If we'd judge everything on financial grounds we'd live in a world that is as boring as the shitty projects most of us work on. (Yeah sure, your work of course is exciting and you come home filled with joy and pleasure every day.)

      Let's not throw away money. But OTOH, let's NOT die "sad but rich".
      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    11. Re:Let's cancel the olympics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I agree, if the Greek for-fathers of the Olympics saw the circus show their creation has become they would be horrified.

      For-fathers? I thought the Greeks were for-boys.

      (And to make my post at least slightly useful, it's fore fathers. )

    12. Re:Let's cancel the olympics by Nemo's+Night+Sky · · Score: 1

      /me signs

    13. Re:Let's cancel the olympics by Rich0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If we'd judge everything on financial grounds we'd live in a world that is as boring as the shitty projects most of us work on. (Yeah sure, your work of course is exciting and you come home filled with joy and pleasure every day.)

        Let's not throw away money. But OTOH, let's NOT die "sad but rich".


      The only problem with this logic is that you want to compel under threat of force individuals to contribute to the building of Colosseums. That's what taxes are - they're not some kind of charity. Choose not to pay them and you'll see the not-so-nice side very quickly.

      I'm not some kind of anti-tax nut - taxes are certainly essential to run the primary functions of government which are essential. I'm not entirely opposed to some aspects of social justice as well within reason. However, when you're talking about building sports megacomplexes why not let those who make the money spend the money? Just have the International Olympic Organization fund the construction of the facilities they use (or choose to use existing facilities). They can recoup those costs through ticket sales and television rights. They'll need to regulate their spending so that they break even.

      As soon as you make the organization that runs the olympics pay for the olympics you'll start to see them question whether we need events that nobody actually watches, and whether the facilities REALLY need to be built to a given standard. You'll also see them asking questions like - why do all the events have to be held at the same time in the same place? Why not just host them all over the place at various times durning the year and just use existing facilities?

    14. Re:Let's cancel the olympics by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      For-fathers? I thought the Greeks were for-boys.

      I thought it was for-sheep.

      (And to make my post at least slightly useful, it's forefathers. )
      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    15. Re:Let's cancel the olympics by Slithe · · Score: 1

      Uh, the death of 'amateurism' was, IMO, a good thing. Read this article for more clarification; it discusses the NCAA, but it applies here as well.

      --
      ---- "XML is like violence. If it doesn't fix the problem, you aren't using enough."
    16. Re:Let's cancel the olympics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naw, Godwin's Law applies if you make a statement such as "liberals want to surrender to the terrorists, this strategy is as doomed as Chamberlin's attempt to appease Hitler".

    17. Re:Let's cancel the olympics by boyko.at.netqos · · Score: 1

      Down with Speed Skaters! And Computational Linguists!

      --
      I used to work for NetQoS. I no longer do, but want to keep the excellent karma attached to this account.
  20. Disease Take Out by Rhesusmonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Whenever I get a disease from China, I'm hungry for another global pandemic like, thirty minutes later.

    --
    You need more psychedelic art in your life. rhesusmonkey.deviantart.com
  21. Journalist Makes Baseless Speculation, News At 11 by rsmith-mac · · Score: 4, Informative

    From Wikipedia, Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease the disease that results from this virus:

    HFMD usually affects infants and children, and is quite common. It is highly contagious and is spread through direct contact with the mucus, saliva, or feces of an infected person. It typically occurs in small epidemics in nursery schools or kindergartens, usually during the summer and autumn months. The usual incubation period is 3-7 days. It is extremely uncommon in adults, however still a possibility. Most adults have strong enough immune systems to utterly defeat the virus...

    And outbreaks in April alone:

    1. Outbreak at Lebanon Valley College, Annville, PA, USA 2. Outbreak in South Portland, ME, USA Infection may have spread to an isolated section of Westbrook, ME, as well 3. Outbreak in Auckland, NZ. 4. Reported in Santa Clara County, California, USA 5. Late March - mid April: 2,600 cases reported in Singapore, no serious cases; 1000 cases reported in the week of 14 - 20 April.[1] 6. Late April: it is reported in the chinese website (sina.com.cn) that in Fuyan, Provinz Anhui, 19 dead. 7. Late April: San Francisco, CA nursery schools.

    Now I'm not saying it's of absolutely no concern, but it's not as if there's some massive killer disease rampaging through China. The average adult has nothing to worry about, and even in children the effects are rather mild with appropriate medical care. This will burn itself out well before the Olympics, and in a year no one will remember it; use some common sense here. If you want to avoid the Olympics (or encourage others to do so) there are much better reasons than this.

  22. Can be said better? by ghostbar38 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's plain propaganda... Remember that there's people in China attacking CNN by the position they took about the Olympics and this is obviously a way to punch back from CNN... Not that I'm pro-China but is obvious the intentions of CNN.

    --
    ghostbar page.
    1. Re:Can be said better? by dwater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I'm glad someone realises it....as a westerner living in China, I find the blatant bias of the western media disgusting.

      --
      Max.
    2. Re:Can be said better? by ghostbar38 · · Score: 0

      Well, you cannot say China's media isn't propagandistic as well and controlled by the government.

      --
      ghostbar page.
  23. news for nerds... by owlnation · · Score: 0, Troll

    um... this may seem like a curious question, but what -- exactly -- does this news story have to do with news for nerds, technology or whatever else that /. usually reports. Slow news day?

    I know that if China-bashing was made an Olympic sport there would be lots of people from /. who'd like to the chance to compete. However... I'm still not seeing the relevance of this story. And I live under the Regime of Gordon Brownshirt in the People's Democratic Republic of the UK, so I'm not criticizing any nation on their lack of freedom. Stones, glass houses and all that.

    1. Re:news for nerds... by justinlee37 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sorry, I think "news for nerds, stuff that matters" covers medicine, politics, and social sciences. Try to stop clicking your ball-point pen and snapping your suspenders in unbridled rage whenever someone suggests that something besides computers is nerdy, you're making the rest of us look like idiots.

    2. Re:news for nerds... by Canosoup · · Score: 1

      um... this may seem like a curious question, but what -- exactly -- does this news story have to do with news for nerds, technology or whatever else that /. usually reports. Slow news day? Contrary to popular belief, global pandemics can even affect people that never leave their parent's basement.
      --
      Hey! Look a Distraction!
    3. Re:news for nerds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      clicking your ball-point pen and snapping your suspenders in unbridled rage

      WTF?

  24. You answered your own question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    To wit:

    I know that if China-bashing was made an Olympic sport there would be lots of people from /. who'd like to the chance to compete. If there are a lot of people on Slashdot interested in such things then it's relevant. Duh.
  25. Diarrhea AND Sores On the Hands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In milder cases, EV71 can cause coldlike symptoms, diarrhea and sores on the hands, feet and mouth, according to the journal Genetic Vaccines and Therapy.

    How are they getting the poo on their hands, feet, and mouth? And what do the sores have to do with that?

    1. Re:Diarrhea AND Sores On the Hands... by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they thought fecal play would cure that... Hey! Maybe all of that disgusting porn is onto something!

    2. Re:Diarrhea AND Sores On the Hands... by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      they wipe their ass. then they DON'T wash their hands. Then they touch their mouth. and they just walk around in the dirt with no shoes.

      not washing hands or having the access to soap and fresh running water is how these things become an epidemic.

      cholera, rhinovirus, and this enterovirus all spread that way.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
  26. Think of the children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, really. Think of the children.
    "... concern for the visitors and athletes expected for the Beijing Olympics in August," as the summary says, is quite simply idiotic and narcissistic (in a national sense), seeing as adults are rarely harmed by this disease, and the outbreak is 1000km or so from Beijing. Any concern among the Chinese government for the health of the athletes is merely to avoid a PR disaster, not because they think a westerner dying from EV71 is likely. Meanwhile there are kids dying - not nearly as many as are dying from other treatable diseases, such as malaria and influenza, but those are only rarely reported on anyway, as they've been killing millions for decades, and there is nothing new about that. If we are going to express concern over this (perhaps because we fear it will grow to a much larger scale, rather than because of the (relatively few) overall fatalities caused up until this point), the Chinese children, who are at present the only people affected or likely to be affected, are the ones we should be concerned about.

    1. Re:Think of the children! by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 1

      You have a very valid point, but the only reason it's news is because of the Olympics, plain and simple. As you described, many children are killed everyday in China with little concern for them, so the only reason this makes CNN.com, /., or any other place is because of "concern for the vistors and athletes" - or, to use your words, because of the "PR disaster." The line that worries you is the same one that makes it news-worthy, as you have so aptly proved.

  27. Pleconaril by Guppy · · Score: 1

    There actually is an antiviral which I expect would be active against this virus -- Pleconaril. Unfortunately, it has not been approved, and I haven't heard of much work being done with it after Phase II trials finished.

    That being said, this particular virus really isn't a danger to healthy adults, mostly to children and the immuno-suppressed.

  28. Only 3700? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that has affected more than 3700 children and killed over 20 ... In a country of about a billion, why does this look unimpressive to me?

  29. Why China by Jeff1946 · · Score: 1

    In that part of the world people, ducks and pigs live in close proximity which facilitates the exchange of viruses. They use human waste as fertilizer also. This is why the origin of most flu viruses begins there. I still remember the Hong Kong flu. Three days of feeling like death warmed over for me and most of my friends, took a month to only need a normal amount of sleep after getting over it.

  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  31. Don't overrate the olympics by hackingbear · · Score: 1

    The Olympics exists for two purposes - to allow athletes to compete against others around the world for sport and to promote the idea of international competition taking the form of athletic events instead of warfare. To promote sport and to promote peace.

    Wrong. The Olympics now exists for only one purpose -- a venue for the advertisers. Don't overrate it.

  32. Heritic! by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    And crossover evolution works a lot faster than regular evolution.

    Everyone knows evolution is just a theory.

    There must be some intelligent design at work to make the Chinese sick.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Heritic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude. You're not funny.

    2. Re:Heritic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually its not crossover evolution, it's crossover mutation, anyway.

      And bacteria/virus mutation happens quite fast in any case.

  33. Sounds good to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Spreading misery around sucks in the short term, but it is good for populations in the long term, for the survivors, anyhow.

    Sure would suck to have another new-world / old-world style clash of infectious vectors again.

    1. Re:Sounds good to me. by Narpak · · Score: 1

      Of course the spreading of disease in the new-world was terrible beyond imagination. Something that I feel is often overlooked in modern history. Native Americans did not have any type of inherited resistance, or medical experience/understanding, against the new diseases, so they died in their millions(apparently, though I would really like any links or reference to anyone that has done serious research on the subject; if anyone knows). As I understand it the prime killers there where; smallpox, measles, influenza and typhoid. In the end probably killing more native Americans than died in violent conflict with the invading Europeans.

      However, while I do not thing such a thing is going to happen in our day and age. Mostly due to the fact that modern means of transportation has spread many disease through the world already, at various paces. And our immune system, and medical establishment, have had a good long time to study and eradicate. Still, there are a few nasties out there, and probably a few we don't know much about (diseases evolve to). So any type of precaution would be good. Preferably not to gather that many people together in one place at all, but since that is unavoidable; they should at least give the matter serious consideration.

  34. Re:Journalist Makes Baseless Speculation, News At by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 4, Informative

    Try harder, read the whole sentence on CNN, and make sure that your source doesn't end up proving you wrong.

    Enterovirus 71 (EV71)

    Enterovirus 71 (EV71)infection may be asymptomatic or may cause diarrhea, rashes, and hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD). However, EV71 also has the potential to cause severe neurological disease. To date, little is known about the molecular mechanisms of host response to EV71 infection. It is stated in [4] that: "EV71 infection led to increases in the level of mRNAs encoding chemokines, proteins involved in protein degradation, complement proteins, and proapoptotis proteins."

    "Enterovirus 71 (EV71), one of the major causative agents for hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD), is sometimes associated with severe central nervous system diseases. In 1997, in Malaysia and Japan, and in 1998 in Taiwan, there were HFMD epidemics involving sudden deaths among young children, and EV71 was isolated from the HFMD patients, including the fatal cases. The nucleotide sequences of each EV71 isolate were determined and compared by phylogenetical analysis. EV71 strains from previously reported epidemics belonged to genotype A-1, while those from recent epidemics could be divided into two genotypes, A-2 and B

  35. Tiger balls! by DeadDecoy · · Score: 1

    Tiger balls and bile from a bears gall bladder are sure to cure any virus. Though the concoction must be applied rectally every 10 minutes until cure or the unfortunate side effect of death. If symptoms persist, proceed to gouge self with needles until there is no blood left for the virus to infect. This is ancient secret Chinese medicine.

  36. can cause 'poliolike paralysis,' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I may have had some of this stuff to drink last night....

  37. FREE TIBET. by CHRONOSS2008 · · Score: 1

    in related news tibetan snowballs form the mountain thrown by monks are blamed for the outbreak....

  38. DEC Alphas? by Phantom69 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that immediately thought that some hybrid DEC Alpha EV7 bug was causing problems in China!?

    1. Re:DEC Alphas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you weren't. On slashdot of all places editors should have clarified this point in advance. On second thought, on slashdot of all places the editors can be relied on not to do clarifications in advance.

  39. Re:Journalist Makes Baseless Speculation, News At by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

    > The average adult has nothing to worry about, and even in children the effects are rather mild with appropriate medical care.

    Adults are NOT immune from HFMD. Most of the adults infected by this virus show no sign of symptons, no harming to themselves done, but they can carry the virii and pass them to their children.

    The HFMD is not a massive killer, indeed. However, in China the public health system is really fragile, and much worse in the rural area. Too few experienced doctors. Too little financial support, so that most people still pay for the huge medical bills draining all they have. Too poor sanitation. That is the killer.

    --
    Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
  40. Tune in at 11! by krazytekn0 · · Score: 1

    Is crazy, over-sensationalized news, full of half-truths killing your children? Tune in at 11 to see!

    --
    Not all life is cyber. Extra Income
  41. FUD stands for Fear Uncertainty and Doubt by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    You know, you dismissed my original post by throwing around the term FUD. But I think you misused it. We normally use that term for troublemakers like Micosoft or SCO in their wars against Linux, when the actors know exactly what their position is, but refuse to state it. We say they are out to cause Fear Uncertainty and Doubt and that one reason they do not back up their claims with facts is because the facts are lacking. But my point wasn't that I'm certain that I know there is going to be a pandemic, but rather that in this case there is a lot of Uncertainty and there could be a pandemic. So if you say that there is FUD here, I'll agree that there is a lot of uncertainty and doubt, and there certainly should be some fear.

    You say now: "It is clear that this (and similar) viruses are responsible for epidemics" and "These outbreaks have been temporally and geographically limited." Sure, so far limited to localized areas. But the point is that now in a time of outbreak several factors are coming together that make it extremely more likely that the virus will be widespread. That anyone could seriously dismiss this as "but it hasn't happened yet" amazes me.

    Could this spread some other way? Sure. Every year a new strain of the flu virus seems to originate in southeast Asia and then spread east to the Americas and then to Europe. It forms small pools and finally seems to die out (it's not recycled to SE Asia), but then next year a new strain starts again in Asia and the process continues. It's important not to dismiss the seriousness of these annual flu strains, they kill thousands to tens of thousands each year. But they are (usually) far from the pandemic that EV71 could be. So while this may also spread with mechanisms similar to the flu, it is alarming to not see people more concerned when this virus is increasing in rural areas that can be expected to make massive imports to Beijing just as hundreds of thousands of world travelers will arrive there, with the potential to carry it to all parts of the globe, and thinking that they are only suffering from the effects of China's pollution.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  42. Semen outbreak in Clinton intern's mouth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More news as this story develops...

    1. Re:Semen outbreak in Clinton intern's mouth... by baggins2001 · · Score: 1

      Which Clinton are you talking about?

      --
      He who said 1,000,000 monkeys on 1,000,000 typewriters would eventually type the great novel, never saw an AOL chat room
    2. Re:Semen outbreak in Clinton intern's mouth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one with the pants. Oh, wait...

      Um, the one who loves pussy. No, that's not quite right, either.

      The one who wants to punish the upper-middle class, while still allowing tax loopholes for the uber-rich like donating money exclusively to the charity which you created so that said charity can pay for your lavish travel expenses on your global speaking tour. Hmm, let me get back to you on that.

  43. China to have spectacular cancer bloom in 20 yrs by spineboy · · Score: 1

    Since environmental regulatory laws seem non existent in China, I wonder what sort of horrific contaminants are floating around in their typical potable water? Routinely drinking water that is even close to be colored bright red/green/blue/black can not be good in the long term for the kidneys, bladder and liver. I expect to see a wild, unprecedented rise in their cancer rate, about 15-20 years after their recent industrial/manufacturing revolution has occurred.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  44. It's a conspiracy by Keychain · · Score: 1

    Doesn't the setting remind anyone of this.

    you know terrorist springing everywhere around the world, olympic games comming in a place where disease outbreak doesn't surprise anybody, security firm hired to protect the stuff, spreading pandemic instead. I do hope ex-kgb agent aren't environementalist and still like money.

  45. Another shot in the infowar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, this is all BS, just like SARS in 2002/2003. These "illnesses" do not exist. They are media operations designed to damage targeted countries, typically China, but sometimes Canada and other import partners of the US.

    1. Re:Another shot in the infowar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. That's it. Dismiss this as a made-up scare to hurt poor old China.

      Obviously there can be no truth to this story because we all know hygiene there is really good, they don't fertilize food crops with human waste, they don't walk around barefoot in chicken and pig waste, they don't provide a perfect breeding ground for animal and human viruses to cross over and mutate, etc.

      Even though every single year, viruses that sweep across the globe - sickening millions and killing the very old and young - originate in China's breeding ground of disease.

      Yep. It's nothing but western propaganda designed to hurt those poor Chinese and an attempt to keep the world from going to China and to spoil China's moment in the sun.

      Just like people in Tiananmin Square never were crushed to death under the treads of Chinese tanks.

      Yep. You are right. Dead right.

  46. Re:Journalist Makes Baseless Speculation, News At by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

    HFMD usually affects infants and children, and is quite common. It is highly contagious and is spread through direct contact with the mucus, saliva, or feces of an infected person. It typically occurs in small epidemics in nursery schools or kindergartens, usually during the summer and autumn months. The usual incubation period is 3-7 days. It is extremely uncommon in adults, however still a possibility. Most adults have strong enough immune systems to utterly defeat the virus... Damn. That sounds like a virus that I would have invented. I hate kids. Although I think I would have introduced some Marburg and Lassa (Ebola Zaire used to be so cool until they invented that damn vaccine) traits into the mix as well. It's not deadly enough. Is there some way that I can improve the virulence? I realize that there aren't many virologists on slashdot but you never know.
    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  47. Thanks by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

    Thanks for that mental image. Now the zombie apocalypse doesn't sound as fun.

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  48. Re:China to have spectacular cancer bloom in 20 yr by dwater · · Score: 1

    Since environmental regulatory laws seem non existent in China, In other words, we might as well not bother reading the rest of your comment.

    --
    Max.
  49. Don't be silly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the cliche cavalry you hear! And the alliteration alligators are swimming fast behind them...

  50. What? People, what's with the bad jokes? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I mean, over 100 comments in a story about the Olympics and a virus that causes polio like symptoms, and not a single joke about athlets staying for the Paralympics?

    Either the SA crowd has left the building or they grew up...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  51. so, does China LIKE being world-stage-center now? by swschrad · · Score: 1

    welcome, media and honored guests! see what China is like in these here modern times!

    well, yah, sure, we'll see for ourselves, then how you've grown.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  52. Re:Journalist Makes Baseless Speculation, News At by Masaq · · Score: 1

    Indeed, Enterovirus 71 is a true pathogen, and while rare, needs to be considered. In fact, poliovirus, causing paralytic polio, is in the enterovirus family. As a practicing physician I recently saw a case of myelitis (inflammation of the spinal cord), here in the US, in a teenager who presented with leg weakness and sensory changes. EV71 was a possibility, although an unlikely one, and we later excluded it by testing. Enteroviruses are transmitted via the fecal-oral route. I.e. feces from an infected person is ingested by another, most commonly through unclean water secondary to poor sanitation. While not wanting to minimize the importance of this outbreak, there are regular outbreaks of enteroviruses and other fecally transmitted pathogens around the world including inside the US. The leading cause of childhood death around the world is diarrheal illness - often caused by such viruses (though children usually die from dehydration, not neurologic symptoms). As other posters have mentioned, the true treatment of these outbreaks is to prevent them through improved sanitation. Insofar as we can expect Beijing sanitation to be better than the rural areas in which this outbreak is being reported, the risk is correspondingly less. In fact, I suspect the Beijing authorities would make sure that athletes have access to toilets and clean drinking water.

  53. Re:Journalist Makes Baseless Speculation, News At by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 1

    You see? Everyone take note. THAT is the way you downplay the article. That answered everything in a very tidy way. Thank you.

    Masaq, in your opinion, how alarming are these numbers and can we expect them to increase? The article was vague on a timeframe for the 3700 cases in one village - so it could have been festering for quite some time - but what's your take on the death toll (percentage-wise) and the general number of cases?

  54. Surely, You're Joking Mr. Feynman! by rootpassbird · · Score: 1

    That's the said technique. It looks like that, all right. Come on sing with me:

    (music in the background...)

    Yo, maaaann, YO!!!!
    This news kicks arse!
    But they also had SARS...

    The elections are near.
    Integrity is scarce!
    The elections are here.
    The Olympics are a farce!

    The elections are here.
    People, fear, Fear, FEAR!
    The elections are here.
    People, hold your votes dear.
    For Gerogie's goons to clear....
    press right over HERE!!
    Diebold!... Diebold!... Diebold!...
    OR, Live in FEAR!!!!
    The elections are here!!
    Yo! Maaan! Yo!
    The elections are here!
    Ho Ho Ho Ho Ho!!

    --
    Hackers have long memories. It works both ways.
  55. It's ducks, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The major vector for avian flu virus entering the population is duck-pig-human, if my memory serves. And yes, in rural China, ducks and pigs are often raised together.

    On the other hand, nobody cooks 'em better than the Chinese, so pandemic seems like a small price to pay.

  56. Such a high mortality rate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only 99.46% of us will survive! The HORROR!

    1. Re:Such a high mortality rate! by WaZiX · · Score: 1

      yeah like only 300 million people would die...

  57. No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First the torch relay, then the nationalist riots, now this. It's clearly their chickens coming home to roost...Just ask Rev. Wright.

  58. Re: by clint999 · · Score: 0

    That's the said technique. It looks like that, all right. Come on sing with me: (music in the background...) Yo, maaaann, YO!!!!This news kicks arse!But they also had SARS... The elections are near.Integrity is scarce!The elections are here.The Olympics are a
  59. Re:Journalist Makes Baseless Speculation, News At by Maigus · · Score: 1

    My son contracted HFM at his daycare at about 6 months. While concerning, with quick treatment he was quite comfortable again in a few days. When we figured out what was wrong he was one unhappy kid.

    While I am not saying it is a minimal problem, access to modern medicine would make all the difference. The question is what kind of treatment options are available to the visitors there, how many kids go and how many parents bring the disease home.

    If we end up with a major outbreak here or worldwide because of it, it could become an issue because it does have the potential to be quite a big problem if not treated quickly and could be quite an economic drain as children with the infection cannot be in child care and that stops parents from working. In the US, I think that would be the larger issue.

  60. Boycott the 2008 Beijing Olympics! by praxisist · · Score: 1

    With SARS still in the back of people's mind, the whole thing may sound familiar. corrupt! muddleheaded!fraudulent! Wen Jiabao,resign! http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/beijing-olympics-boycott.html