Slashdot Mirror


Homer Simpson Drawn With Web 2.0-Style ASCII Art

boogi78 writes "Remember ASCII art? This is the Web 2.0 CSS version of ASCII art featuring Homer Simpson. Here is a CSS G.W. Bush. There's also an program that automatically converts jpegs into 'CSS images,' but it's a Windows executable. I found no sources for it, but I got it to work with WINE."

39 of 160 comments (clear)

  1. art? by the+brown+guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Remember ASCII art?" If you're asking, you must be new here.
    --
    Orbis terrarum est non altus satis
  2. Original Thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Original pouet thread which this spawned:
    http://pouet.net/topic.php?which=5204&page=1

  3. Nothing like having my portrait done in CSS by HomerJ · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's the most beautiful thing these eyes have ever seen....well except for Marge, when she wears that blue thing with the things.

  4. Web 2.0? by Chris+Burkhardt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So now using CSS and JavaScript is a criterion for "Web 2.0"? When will it end?

    --
    "And there be unix which have made themselves unix for the kingdom of heaven's sake." - Matt. 19:12
    1. Re:Web 2.0? by brucifer · · Score: 5, Informative

      So now using CSS and JavaScript is a criterion for "Web 2.0"? When will it end? When "Web 3.0" hits
    2. Re:Web 2.0? by Chris+Burkhardt · · Score: 3, Funny

      When "Web 3.0" hits Ah. Can't wait.
      --
      "And there be unix which have made themselves unix for the kingdom of heaven's sake." - Matt. 19:12
    3. Re:Web 2.0? by BBrown · · Score: 4, Informative
      Agree. Using CSS is NOT a Web 2.0 application. I would expect better from /.ers.

      Recommend those curious read O'Reilly's definition here:
        http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.
       
      Since he coined it, he's probably pretty accurate. A lot of it generally includes user-generated content and the transition from single publisher sites (NYTimes) to community driven sites (blogs, Yelp!, etc.)

      Here's a table he uses to explain the difference:
       

      Web 1.0 -> Web 2.0
      DoubleClick -> Google AdSense
      Ofoto -> Flickr
      Akamai -> BitTorrent
      mp3.com -> Napster
      Britannica Online -> Wikipedia
      personal websites -> blogging
      evite -> upcoming.org and EVDB
      domain name speculation -> search engine optimization
      page views -> cost per click
      screen scraping -> web services
      publishing -> participation
      content management systems -> wikis
      directories (taxonomy) -> tagging ("folksonomy")
      stickiness -> syndication
    4. Re:Web 2.0? by pbhj · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Web 3.0 will be coming out with something truly fantastic... perhaps they'll introduce something called HTML? I know that was a tongue-in-cheek rhetorical question but ... I'm hoping "web 3.0" will have wide use of SVG. When I can design webpages like I design the previews in a vector editor ... no hang on, that might put me out of a job - please stick to the current mess.

      Carry on.
    5. Re:Web 2.0? by Dan541 · · Score: 2

      I'm sick of the whole "Web 2.0" buzz word that those media asshats keep spreading all over the place.

      It almost as bad as "Information super highway"

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    6. Re:Web 2.0? by Mathinker · · Score: 5, Funny

      If we're really lucky, after that we'll get Web 3.1, Web 3.14, Web 3.141, ...
      But don't hold your breath waiting...

    7. Re:Web 2.0? by osu-neko · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are you sure that's the progression? I thought Web 3.1 would be followed by Web 3.11, and then by Web for Workgroups.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    8. Re:Web 2.0? by NotBorg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Recommend those curious read O'Reilly's definition

      That definition is 5 pages long. No wonder no one knows what it is. Or perhaps "definition" is not really the word you're looking. "Description" would perhaps be a better word.



      From the O'Reilly article:

      "Like many important concepts, Web 2.0 doesn't have a hard boundary, but rather, a gravitational core."


      Sounds kinda fuzzy to me. At any rate it's kind of like the words "gay" and "hacker." They don't mean what they used to mean and you can't really do much about that. Use different wording if you want to be understood.



      The term "Web 2.0" has been pwnt.

      --
      I want this account deleted.
    9. Re:Web 2.0? by Provocateur · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What was .0 the mid 90s web of sliced to hell images, frames, and animated gif based technologies.

      mid-90s? I swear I saw all that in MySpace just the other day

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    10. Re:Web 2.0? by KinkyClown · · Score: 2, Funny

      These are all obsolete when Web NT will come out...

  5. Re:Seen this long ago for Mac OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sameish idea: DeImg from The Daily Grind Network. AKA how to turn a 30k image into a 6 meg browser killing table.
  6. Seen it longer ago by mrmeval · · Score: 4, Informative

    pngtopnm | ppmtopgm | pgmnorm | pnmscale -width 80 | ppmtopgm | pgmtopbm | pbmtoascii

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  7. Only one thing to say about this rubbish... by Cryacin · · Score: 2, Funny

    DOH!!!

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  8. Bored? by frdmfghtr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Clearly this is the result of having FAR too much free time.

    --
    Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    1. Re:Bored? by Ardeaem · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clearly this is the result of having FAR too much free time. ...says the guy reading and posting on Slashdot :)
    2. Re:Bored? by MooseMuffin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Speaking as someone with far too much free time, I've never done anything /. worthy. I imagine the same is true of many of us, so lets give the guy some credit.

  9. Re:heh, slashdotted already... by Nullav · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google cache. It doesn't animate, but the text-image is somewhat impressive.

    --
    I just read Slashdot for the articles.
  10. Looks like Prodigy art by jmauro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Looks just like the block art from Prodigy from back in 1990's. All this tech and we're back to the same place as 1995.

  11. Slashdotted by Itninja · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And only after 25 comments. :O(

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  12. Re:Seen this long ago for Mac OS X by jasonjacks0n · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sameish idea: DeImg from The Daily Grind Network.

    Actually, this is a bit different - and much more unique and impressive, IMHO. I can't get to the first link (slashdotted already), but the Bush portrait and this Homer are both made using overlapping bits of various font characters, sized and colored using CSS, to make the curves and lines of the picture.

    View source on that Homer "image" to see what I mean - the artist basically used font characters as a palette of vectors, and clipped out just the partial shape of each character that he wanted, using CSS properties.

    As a result, instead of bloating to many MB, that Homer picture is only ~16KB. Bush is only ~32KB.

    Translating pixels into an HTML table is not that interesting now.. I mean, I was excited when my brother wrote an app to do that about 8 years ago, and I even wrote a little companion app that parsed ANSI escape sequences and turned ANSI art into HTML tables too, but that was back then. :)

    This, on the other hand, is really original and unique. I'm pretty impressed by it.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
  13. Great, now I'm gonna have nightmares. by Perseid · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you think the blocky ASCII Dubya is bad, highlight his text. Holy crap.

  14. I really expected teh bush one to be by infonography · · Score: 2, Funny

    goatse

    and I would have felt it was a good likeness.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  15. Working Link by TwilightSentry · · Score: 3, Informative

    As the Homer link doesn't seem to work for me, try: http://www.romancortes.com/blog/homer-css/

    --
    How to enable garbage collection on a system without protected memory: #define malloc() ((void *) rand())
  16. Scales up really well by Mathinker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The big advantage of this kind of graphic is that it scales up to a nice sharp anti-aliased image as the user increases the text size. Well, at least Homer did when I tried it.

    But of course, properly implemented SVG would do that just as well. It just lacks the super-geekiness of using something in an unintended way to get a useful result. And, of course, this way might have better support in some browsers than SVG.

  17. Nothing to see here, move along by hee+gozer · · Score: 5, Informative

    It needs Verdana from MS TrueType core fonts, so it doesn't work across multiple platforms. The link is slashdotted anyway. Here's a version that's still available: http://www.romancortes.com/blog/homer-css/

    Here's how i see it: http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/9183/homeraz4.png

    1. Re:Nothing to see here, move along by Nicolay77 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is the first time I have ever seen the Homer rendered that bad.

      What ugly browser do you use?

      --
      We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
  18. Re:Seen this long ago for Mac OS X by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 5, Funny

    But of course! That's what Web 2.0 is all about: turning simple applications with a bit of necessary networking into unmanageably complex monstrosities requiring a full data-center and a plugged-up, memory-gobbling web browser to support one measly user and brought to life by the power of Great Cthulhu.

  19. Front page perfection by peipas · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ahhh, posts about the Simpsons AND MacGyver on the front page at the same time. I can die now; order has been restored.

  20. Homer by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

    See, you're using Web 1.0, so it's rendering Homer more like he was drawn in the early Simpsons cartoons.

  21. But can I block it? by DJ+Manning · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I fear that our advertising overlords will use this to display advertising that I'd otherwise block. The next step in fighting advertising on the web? Block all ASCII charaters from being displayed!!! That'll fix those advertisers.

  22. Re:Seen this long ago for Mac OS X by maxume · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Watch him grow a character at a time:

    http://nedbatchelder.com/blog/200805/css_homer_animated.html

    (apparently the site is down, someone must have already linked it from somewhere that drives traffic)

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  23. Control-a on the Bush Picture by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you go to the edit menu in your browser and choose "select all" on the George Bush picture, he ends up looking like a Quintesson from the Transformers...which probably explains the last 7 years.

  24. Re:Coming Soon: Cmdr Taco's Son's Fingerpaintings by Tacvek · · Score: 2, Informative

    It looks fine on Windows with Firefox and Opera at the very least. However, it requires a specific font (Verdana) which may cause problems with some Linux systems that do not have that font installed.

    --
    Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
  25. Slashdot owes me the cost of two ibuprofen. by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My head hurts whenever I read "Web 2.0".

    Do the world a favor: smack anyone who uses the phrase "web two point oh" in a conversation. Smack them. Smack them hard.

    --
    "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
  26. This tool is _so cool_ by multipartmixed · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've been sending goatse pics to unsuspecting web-savvy friends all morning. I haven't pulled off an unsuspecting-goatse in _years_!

    I attach them as HTML source inside text/plain MIME sections

    Nerdy friends then get annoyed at my email-incompetence, save them as .html files and pop 'em open in the browser.

    Whooo hoooo

    Now... who else can I goatse?

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?