Slashdot Mirror


Terrorist Recognition Handbook

Ben Rothke writes "There are two types of writers about terrorism, experts such as Daniel Pipes and Steven Emerson who write from a distance and others that write graphic tales of first-hand from the trenches war stories. Terrorist Recognition Handbook: A Practitioner's Manual for Predicting and Identifying Terrorist Activities, is unique in that author Malcolm Nance is a 20-year veteran of the U.S. intelligence community and writes from a first hand-perspective, but with the organization and methodology of writers such as Pipes and Emerson. Those combined traits make the book extraordinarily valuable and perhaps the definitive text on terrorist recognition." Read below for the rest of Ben's review Terrorist Recognition Handbook: A Practitioner's Manual for Predicting and Identifying Terrorist Activities, Second Edition author Malcolm Nance pages 480 publisher CRC rating 10 reviewer Ben Rothke ISBN 978-1420071832 summary Perhaps the definitive text on terrorist recognition.

3 of 344 comments (clear)

  1. Huh? by Oxy+the+moron · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You mean they don't all wear those funny towel hats on their heads? :)

    --

    Proudly supporting the Libertarian Party.

  2. Re:Good paragraph by d_beep · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    A more interesting thing to note is the mention of illegal aliens in the same vein as terrorists and spies, not once but twice( these scum of the earth .....how dare they.....)

    scary !!!

  3. Re:No book necessary by DesScorp · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I always thought that terrorists were anyone designated by the United States State Department, or Department of Fatherland Security as being opposed to US foreign policy. This is what passes for insightful on Slashdot these days? Even if you hate Bush and his policies, making a blanket statement that anyone opposed to current policy is considered a terrorist is the ranting of a petulant child. Jacques Chirac's government wasn't considered "terrorist", and there was no greater opponent of the Bush Administration in Europe. Very few agencies of established governments are considered sponsors of terrorism, with Iran's Revolutionary Guards being a prominent example.

    And "Department of Fatherland Security"? Godwin must be so proud.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel