Platypus Genome Decoded
TaeKwonDood writes "Is it reptile, bird or mammal? Some of each. Does it have venom, lay eggs and lactate? Yes. Upon discovery in 1798, fellow scientists thought it was for an episode of 'Thou hast been Punk'd,' but this Australia native, on home on land and in water, is real and, finally, it gets its own decoded genome. It's no surprise the DNA is as messed up as the critter itself."
also reported by the ABC http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/05/08/2238461.htm on a personal note, a platypus is really interesting to watch in the wild. it's movement is quite lizardlike.
Kids! Bringing about Armageddon can be dangerous. Do not attempt it in your home!
Calling the Platypus a "messed up" animal is one thing, but comparing it to an Ashton Kutcher show is just uncalled for.
National Geographic most likely.
Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
Strangely, the DNA strands seem to spell out THCTHCTHCTHCTHC repeated a hundred million times.
why can't i buy platypus cheese?
I had just recently learned that they also had poisonous barbs on their back feet. What is surprising that it is one of the most painful venoms on the planet. A gentleman that had been stuck by a platypus had also been struck by shrapnel in World War II.
He said if he had to choose between the two, it would be the grenade.
So the cute little bastards are also very dangerous. I still want to pick one up and hug them though.
Intelligent Design, meet Platypus.
...
Platypus, meet Intelligent Design.
Maybe there is a God, maybe not -- but would any sane being *design* something like this??
Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
... and how do I compile it ?
I would totally design something like... oh... wait...
I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?
Interesting indeed... I vaguely recall some debate when sequencing the platypus was proposed, over whether or not it was a worthy use of funding and sequencer time, being that it was not considered a representative of any medically or commercially important organism, or one of the various "model" laboratory organisms.
Anyway, saw a comment posted as a reply to a Nature article on it which also suggested we take a look at "other 'outlier' organisms, including the echidna, birds like the kiwi or tinamous, tuataras, nautilus, and similar organisms." Sounds like a good idea -- here's hoping we see sequence data from other living fossil organisms.
I tried to compile it, and all I got was a segmentation fault.
We told you it was real. Now we just have to decode the Bunyip genome.
Now that their DNA has been decoded, we will find out why platypuses are such powerful sorcerers.
Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
This is, of course, all just theory.
I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
Actually platypodes and platypuses are acceptable plurals for onithorhynchus anatinus.
Just don't call a Greek policeman a platypus, even if it is etymologically correct. They get irritated easily.
-- John Dierdorf, Austin TX
And mammals don't lay eggs or come with poison spines, but when has that ever stopped the platypus before?
I could never decide as a kid whether the platypus disproved intelligent design (I mean, come on, look at it) or whether it was just God's grand joke. "Suck on this, natural selection. I wonder how I can make something LESS plausible. Oh, needs more poison spines... and a beaver tail. Oh, and just to top it off, I'm going to stealth mod them with electrolocation so after the humans can actually detect that they'll just go 'Oh WTF no you didn't'. Its good being omnipotent."
Help poke pirates in the eyepatch, arr.