Slashdot Mirror


Fedora 9 (Sulphur) Released

BrianGKUAC writes "Fedora 9 has been released as of 10 AM Eastern Time this morning. Release notes can be found here. Some of the more interesting new features include a new package management system, which can be used as an alternative to pup and pirut, known as PackageKit. This release also includes GNOME 2.22 and/or KDE 4.0.3, and Firefox 3 beta 5. Overall, there are a lot of improvements worth looking at, and the Bittorrent seeds are already feeding the release fairly effectively."

21 of 218 comments (clear)

  1. So by sveard · · Score: 4, Funny

    What smell is that? :p

  2. You forgot the most important feature... by eck06 · · Score: 4, Funny

    - Uses seeding with openssl

  3. PackageKit by brejc8 · · Score: 5, Informative

    PackageKit is actually a just a tool which sits on top of yum and does not replace it. It does replace pup and pirut though.

    See PackageKit site of the release notes.

    1. Re:PackageKit by tobiasly · · Score: 5, Informative

      PackageKit is actually a just a tool which sits on top of yum and does not replace it.

      Depends on your definition of yum I guess. It does/can replace yum, the command-line tool, but does not replace the yum database. The wording is misleading though.

  4. PackageKit does not replace yum by Tester · · Score: 5, Informative

    PackageKit is only a front-end over yum (or any other backend), it does not replace it.

  5. Seed, damn you! by bignetbuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    download pegged at 892KBps. An hour to snatch the DVD ISO!

    SEED, you bums! SEED!

    1. Re:Seed, damn you! by Dog-Cow · · Score: 4, Funny

      Some Debian guy removed the seed code so Red Hat would be slower!

  6. Konsole disimproving? by BDaniels · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a sysadmin and use KDE all day long, with Konsole as my terminal. I tried the preview release of Fedora 9 and found
    that the new Konsole - has less features!

    The buttons for quickly closing/opening a tab are gone. Right-clicking on tabs is gone. The ability to send input to all tabs
    is completely gone, not even accessible through menus.

    These are features I use every day while working on servers. KDE4 adds a lot of eyecandy (and a Vista-style 'start menu' - ick),
    but why remove useful functionality?

    1. Re:Konsole disimproving? by icydog · · Score: 5, Interesting

      IIRC, KDE said that 4.1 will have feature parity with 3.5. 4.0 is still a work-in-progress. I do agree though, I use konsole all the time and it's rather unpleasant right now. 4.0 is also missing a bunch of other basic stuff, like dragging between the two panes (files and the folder tree) in Konqueror.

    2. Re:Konsole disimproving? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm a sysadmin and use KDE all day long... Oh, come on, we're supposed to believe THAT? If you were a REAL sysadmin, you'd use twm at most! And you wouldn't ADMIT to having X11 installed at all! You'd talk about how console mode lets you do everything faster, and how bloated X11 is compared to X10...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Konsole disimproving? by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm surprised they didn't offer both as an option. Mandriva 2008.1 has KDE3 by default, and an optional KDE4 install. You can install both, and select which one you want from the login screen. It's way too early to force KDE4 on everyone. A lot of features are still missing, and it's still pretty unstable. For the Record Mandriva 2009, plans to be KDE4 only. Hopefully KDE4 will be more mature by then.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:Konsole disimproving? by Peter+H.S. · · Score: 5, Informative

      These are features I use every day while working on servers. KDE4 adds a lot of eyecandy (and a Vista-style 'start menu' - ick),
      but why remove useful functionality? Lots of KDE 3.5 features hasn't made it into 4.0 KDE yet. KDE 4.0 is bleeding edge just like Fedora 9 is.

      --
      Regards
    5. Re:Konsole disimproving? by AtomicX · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hello - as the maintainer of Konsole I'll explain what is going on. I'll address specific points first:

      > The buttons for quickly closing/opening a tab are gone.

      Konsole in KDE 4.0 is orientated more around keyboard shortcuts - which I think makes sense in a terminal. (Ctrl+Shift+N creates a new tab, Ctrl+Shift+W closes the current one, although I would recommend using the normal Ctrl+D combination to exit the shell)

      Enough people complained (via bugs.kde.org) that I added the 'New Tab' button back in as an option in KDE 4.1. Plus there are Firefox-esqueue close buttons on tabs and support for re-arranging tabs by drag and drop or moving tabs between windows.

      > The ability to send input to all tabs is completely gone

      It didn't work at the time of the 4.0 release so it got cut. It has been reimplemented in KDE 4.1 with more flexibility in response to various RFE bug reports:

      http://commit-digest.org/issues/2008-04-13/files/konsole-copy-input-to.png

      It is not the case the Konsole in KDE 4.0 has 'less features' in total. The menus may look far emptier but there is actually not very much missing. In fact it has quite a few additions, mostly fulfilling a large backlog of feature requests in bugs.kde.org, which I think are very useful:

      * The terminal setup UI was replaced with one which is simpler but also more flexible
      * Split-view mode
      * Incremental search
      * Key binding editor
      * Improved performance, especially scrolling in large windows

      In any case, if you have a complaint then please report it at http://bugs.kde.org/ - I am much more likely to read about it there than on Slashdot. Plus it also allows users to vote on the issues most important to them which is helpful from my perspective trying to allocate the limited spare time I have.

      Finally, as someone who followed KDE development discussion quite closely over the last two years, it is inaccurate to say that KDE is attempting to "copy" Windows Vista or is in some large measure "inspired" by it. The menu for example was originally developed by OpenSuSE for KDE 3 - a long time before Vista was released, based on openSuSE's own research. Evidence of this can be found in some notably different design decisions compared with Vista's menu. For example, both the Gnome SLED menu and KDE's "Kickoff" have a search facility but it is located at the top of the menu rather than the button because users couldn't find it when it was placed at the bottom.

      I think the view that KDE is trying to "clone" Windows, if not trolling, boils down to the use of black on the bar at the bottom of the screen. I am not involved with that part of KDE but I understand that the look of it is quite likely to change somewhat for KDE 4.1.

  7. Re:Beta software in a production release? by wizardforce · · Score: 4, Informative

    Firefox 3 is set to be released in June, the next Fedora release will be much later, the same decision was made with Ubuntu Hardy which is a LTS release so it would make some sense to have the latest browser version as it's not too far from the actual release date for FF3. but assuming you don't like FF3, there is nothing stopping you from installing FF2 instead, your FF profile works fine on both anyway.

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  8. Beta XORG as well by fyrie · · Score: 4, Informative

    I can live with the beta Firefox, but the fact that they are using a beta XORG has put a kink in my plans to upgrade to F9 because NVidia doesn't have drivers ready. I'm anxiously awaiting this situation to be resolved. In the meantime I'll stick with F8 which is very stable at the moment.

    1. Re:Beta XORG as well by tuffy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Beta NVidia drivers are available for the beta x.org server. There's also the Nouveau drivers, which might be good enough for 2D performance.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  9. Re:Marketing 101 by creepynut · · Score: 5, Funny

    "AssTard", you make an excellent point! Thank you for your input!

  10. Re:Hope my issues with Fedora are solved by Otter · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have the same printer (as you say, it's touted for having good Linux support) and followed the instructions in a Gentoo forum thread to ignore the driver CD and just use CUPS. That worked perfectly, FWIW. (Of course, getting it supported by my Mac took maybe 5 seconds, but so it goes...)

  11. Will not install on Samsung hard disks by kriston · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fedora 9 will not install on certain Samsung hard disks.

    If your hard disk has a "/" character in its model name as reported through the ATA interface then Anaconda will fail. The Python error message reads like "ends with '/' and is not just '/'" and the kernel halts.

    I have a very standard desktop Dell Optiplex that has one of these hard disks, model number "SAMSUNG HD080HJ/P".

    The "/" character kills the installation.

    So disappointing yet so simple to have fixed before release.

    --

    Kriston

  12. Re:Beta software in a production release? by ettlz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Funny thing though, it never crashes.
    You should tinker with the kernel features more. ;)
  13. Re:FedoraSoft by Peter+H.S. · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's been a long time since I've heard any excitement about Fedora. The Linux buzz has moved on while RedHat lives in it's own little world, no longer cutting edge and as stuffy as Microsoft... Well, Mr. Frosty Piss, I really do think you have followed Fedora that closely; stuff like LVM, selinux tend to appear in Fedora before any other distro. This release has KDE 4.03, PackageKit, kernel modesetting, EXT4 (preview), OpenJDK 6 etc. If you don't find that stuff exciting hand over your geek card.

    Me, a personally doesn't give a damn about "buzz", I want a nice solid but modern distro that is free as in free speech, and Fedora is just that.

    Btw. next time you bad mouth Red Hat, which seems to be popular though lame attitude among certain people, just remember which Linux vendor who has contributed the most to make Linux what it is today, and how much Red Hat still contributes to core linux technology. And Red Hat has never, ever waivered in its support of Free, OSS software, and eg. released some proprietary closed source software as part of their distros,

    --
    Regards