Slashdot Mirror


Was This the First CC Community-Edited Novel?

Odinson writes "In late 2005 I released a draft of a science fiction novel under the by-nc-nd CC license. I started accepting edits in the hope of polishing a manuscript for submission to a publisher. A publisher never materialized, but after thousands of comments the draft started getting really solid. So a couple of months ago I decided to buy an ISBN and sell hard copies from Lulu. While doing research for a press release, I was unable to uncover the first community-edited, CC-licensed work of fiction. I strongly suspect that my novel is the first. Can anybody point to a prior example? How about under other licenses? If someone has traveled this road before, I'd like to ask them how it went. I would also like to vet this question here before staking a claim to be the first."

194 comments

  1. Fanfic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    There certainly existed community-edited novel-length fanfiction before 2005, although I don't know if you would count them as "real" novels.

    Also the license terms for fanfiction are generally rather murky :)

    1. Re:Fanfic by jackharrer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Slashdot.org

      sometimes it feels like south american novel...

      --

      "an experienced, industrious, ambitious, and often, quite often, picturesque liar" - Mark Twain
    2. Re:Fanfic by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Also the license terms for fanfiction are generally rather murky :) Especially when gay sex is involved. ;)
      --
      "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
    3. Re:Fanfic by rvw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Slashdot.org sometimes it feels like south american novel... I think the "novelty" here is that this is the first slashdotted book!
    4. Re:Fanfic by the+phantom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, you may not be too far off. Anyone else remember Jon Katz, and his book on Columbine? "Voices from the Hellmouth," or something like that -- it was a bunch of Slashdot comments slapped between two covers...

  2. First by-nc-nd CC post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hereby releese this post under the by-nc-nd CC lisense. Feel free to submit ne changes you would like to c. Am I teh famous now?

    1. Re:First by-nc-nd CC post! by martin-boundary · · Score: 4, Funny
      *
      * (c) 2008 Anonymous Coward
      * This comment is free; you can
      * modify it and repost under the
      * nc-by-nd CC license.
      *

      I'm a lumberjack and I'm ok!
      I release this post with the CC license!
      HE'S A LUMBERJACK AND HE'S OK!
      HE RELEASES THIS POST WITH THE CC LICENSE!

      I write a post, I eat my lunch
      I ask for changes from others.
      HE WRITES A POST, HE EATS HIS LUNCH
      HE ASKS FOR CHANGES FROM OTHERS!

      I write down comments, I skip and jump
      I like to press wild flowers
      HE WRITES DOWN COMMENTS, HE SKIPS AND JUMPS
      HE LIKES TO PRESS WILD FLOWERS

      I put on women's clothing
      That's why I'm famous now!
      HE PUTS ON WOMEN'S CLOTHING
      THAT'S WHY HE'S FAMOUS NOW!

    2. Re:First by-nc-nd CC post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think I'll have the spam,spam,spam,baked beans and spam.

    3. Re:First by-nc-nd CC post! by k33l0r · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slashdot admins have just received an email from BBC Worldwide requesting the removal of your comment due to certain copyright violations.

      You will be hearing from the BBC legal department in due course.

    4. Re:First by-nc-nd CC post! by freddled · · Score: 0

      Monty Python - may his name be eternally praised by geeks - owned his own copyright.

    5. Re:First by-nc-nd CC post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By-nc-nd does not allow users to modify the work.

    6. Re:First by-nc-nd CC post! by kiehlster · · Score: 1

      Obviously. The whole intent is to sue the first person to violate the CC license. Then he'll be the first person to profit off a /. comment.

    7. Re:First by-nc-nd CC post! by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 3, Informative

      Er, Monty Python wasn't a person. They were a comedy troupe.

    8. Re:First by-nc-nd CC post! by xappax · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, I believe they were a flying circus.

    9. Re:First by-nc-nd CC post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Friggin' half a century later, we're still explaining this to people.

      We should all scour our local phone books until we find some poor sap with the bad fortune to have been named Monty Python. Then all call him up and ask if he still does shows.

    10. Re:First by-nc-nd CC post! by freddled · · Score: 1

      It was one of these things we do here called a 'joke', see wikipedia.

  3. Community edited by vigmeister · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sure that's such a good idea?

    Pg. 147

    "As Ja Rool climbed out of the skies CLAIRE IS T3H AWESOME of Planet 142, in the yellow smoke trails he caught the glint BUCH SUCKS of an enemy spacecraft. Maneuvering his nimble XPJ-134, JAMES LOVE CINDY."

    Cheers!
    --
    Vig

    --
    Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    1. Re:Community edited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      This isn't wikipedia... it's a book!

    2. Re:Community edited by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny

      The flip of a switch gives Joe, an ordinary mechanic, superhuman abilities. He discovers his new powers after his aunt saves his life with restricted nanites.
      ^U It was a dark and stormy night.
      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:Community edited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      This isn't wikipedia, its a trap!

    4. Re:Community edited by ubrgeek · · Score: 4, Funny

      Citation needed.

      ;)

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    5. Re:Community edited by mihalis · · Score: 0

      that's no moon, it's a space station

    6. Re:Community edited by Linker3000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Joe was eaten by a Grue

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    7. Re:Community edited by JonathanR · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ahh... It's not goatse.cx, it's just a space station.

    8. Re:Community edited by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Read the sequel. You find out that CINDY R N FUGLY SLUTT.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    9. Re:Community edited by arkarumba · · Score: 1

      you're far too trusting

    10. Re:Community edited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I touched my aunt's nanites, I felt like I had been given superhuman powers.

    11. Re:Community edited by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I'm Joe, you insensitive clod.

    12. Re:Community edited by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny
      The opening line of the novel?

      FIRST!!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    13. Re:Community edited by LMacG · · Score: 1

      These are not the editors you're looking for.

      --
      Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    14. Re:Community edited by sootman · · Score: 1
      Two days later...

      This testosterone-fueled space-fantasy is a stub! You can help by expanding it.

      "As [[Ja Rool]] climbed out of the skies CLAIRE IS T3H AWESOME of Planet 142, in the yellow smoke trails he caught the glint BUCH SUCKS [NPOV] of an enemy spacecraft. Maneuvering his nimble XPJ-134, JAMES LOVE CINDY [citation needed]."

      Category: SciFi
      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    15. Re:Community edited by Odinson · · Score: 1

      They did. I don't care. I knew four Italian guys named Joe in when I was in high school and one with the last name Vallone. It happens a lot in NY.

    16. Re:Community edited by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

    17. Re:Community edited by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


          That's no space station, that's Uranus! You can tell by the Klingons around it!

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  4. So I tried to download the book... by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 2, Informative

    So I tried to download the book... and its going at a few bytes per second... I think we slashdotted his poor server. :(

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    1. Re:So I tried to download the book... by SeaFox · · Score: 5, Funny

      and its going at a few bytes per second... I think we slashdotted his poor server.

      No, it's still in editing. Please stand by while we continue to write it.
    2. Re:So I tried to download the book... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1
    3. Re:So I tried to download the book... by meshmaster · · Score: 1

      www.addventure.com has you beat by a decade or so as the first.

    4. Re:So I tried to download the book... by SQLGuru · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, it's pretty easy to write it......now for it to be readable, different story.

      for( i=0; inovel_length_word_count; i++)
      { strcat( novel, " " );
          strcat( novel, random_word_from_dictionary(d) );
      }

      Done.

      Layne

    5. Re:So I tried to download the book... by Sebilrazen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, that's what I call a Never Ending Story.

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    6. Re:So I tried to download the book... by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      Slashdot killed my less than symbol

      for( i=0; i (less than) novel_length_word_count; i++) etc.

      Layne

    7. Re:So I tried to download the book... by ady1 · · Score: 1

      Never ending my foot. Depending on which computer it is written (or executed :p), this story could be as big as 640k to 3.5GB.

  5. Cheap publicity. by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I hope you realize that this sounds like nothing more than a cheap publicity stunt?

    This novel was originally posted online as a rough draft in late 2005. It has made great strides, receiving tens of thousands of reader contributions. It has received good reader reviews, and has been downloaded 6000 times in a two year span. So, do the people that helped you get a cut of the $12.95?
    --
    "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
    1. Re:Cheap publicity. by freedom_india · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, do the people that helped you get a cut of the $12.95? That is the main problem of crowd sourcing or open sourced works.
      Who profits off wikipedia? The maintainer, the contributors, ?
      How do we distribute?
      Is it the cost of printing (which is permissible) or more?
      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    2. Re:Cheap publicity. by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If there's people who are willing to do the editing for free, why would you pay them?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:Cheap publicity. by endofcell · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is not a problem of crowdsourcing at all. Contributors to Mozilla and Firefox don't ask for a cut of the profits/donations it receives from Google or other partnerships, and users of the browser don't get paid for using it. The fact you get to use Wikipedia is enough, and no one forces you to contribute to the common good, or commons. If you want to participate that is a free choice. You should not be vilified for trying to get some revenue back for open sourcing your work -- you should be congratulated for releasing it as such rather than going for the default 'commercial' model.

    4. Re:Cheap publicity. by Chapter80 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, do the people that helped you get a cut of the $12.95?
      Anyone else think this is funny? The fact that the parent contributed this comment to a forum that is making money from ads off this very page!

      Using this logic, Slashdot should be paying its contributors. Surely the comments are a significant source of value to the readers, and they don't pay a penny for them.

    5. Re:Cheap publicity. by makkverk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This novel was originally posted online as a rough draft in late 2005. It has made great strides, receiving tens of thousands of reader contributions. It has received good reader reviews, and has been downloaded 6000 times in a two year span.
      So, do the people that helped you get a cut of the $12.95?
      No, but under the CC lisence they're all allowed to print and sell the book themselves.
    6. Re:Cheap publicity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Too damn right! And as I make the most posts I demand the biggest cut!

    7. Re:Cheap publicity. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The fact that the parent contributed this comment to a forum that is making money from ads off this very page!
      There are ads here? Hell, I've been a subscriber so long I've completely forgotten that /. has advertisements.

      Ad-block is the bomb.
      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:Cheap publicity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You being a subscriber is even a closer analogy to the story of the guy selling books. You are buying Slashdot in a similar fashion that others buy the book! I should get a cut of your subscription payment for this insightful comment (and I have made many insightful/incite-ful comments.)

    9. Re:Cheap publicity. by fbjon · · Score: 1

      They might, as a generous offer, or they could just publish the thing themselves and rake in the massive profits.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    10. Re:Cheap publicity. by Phyrexicaid · · Score: 4, Funny

      If there's people who are willing to do the editing for free, why would you pay them? "If there are people" No charge ;)
      --
      The meme is dead, long live the meme!
    11. Re:Cheap publicity. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      but nc is non-commercial isn't it?

      This is not like Open Source or Free Software.

      It is closer to some level of Shared Source (though not early as insidious).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    12. Re:Cheap publicity. by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They're allowed to print it, but not sell it. It's the by-nc-nd licence, which means "Attribution, Non-commercial, No Derivative Works".

      I presume that as the copyright holder, rather than a licensee, he's allowed to also sell copies. The question is whether the "community contributions" hold any copyright as well, and if he is only entitled to them under the CC license terms (like GPL patches without assignation of copyright). If so, he might not be within his rights to sell the book via Lulu!

    13. Re:Cheap publicity. by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1

      Yea, I subscribe to ad-block plus too. People that pay for web sites are idiots.

    14. Re:Cheap publicity. by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      No they're not, its under CC-attribution-no commercial-no derivative license. They can print it off and sell at cost price ofc, but they cant get a cut.

      The horror that is the CC license, i take particular objection to no derivative, which seams a lot like microsoft's shared source, "you can look, but you cant touch". In practice (this)CC license is no different to proprietary licenses only under cc you can copy legally (which has no real affect for proprietary products anyway)

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    15. Re:Cheap publicity. by Josh+Triplett · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I presume that as the copyright holder, rather than a licensee, he's allowed to also sell copies. The question is whether the "community contributions" hold any copyright as well, and if he is only entitled to them under the CC license terms (like GPL patches without assignation of copyright). If so, he might not be within his rights to sell the book via Lulu! Unless the author established some additional terms on top of the CC-by-nc-nd license, any "community contributions" represent unauthorized derivative works.

      If the author had instead used CC-by-nc-sa, the "community contributions" would fall under the same license, which would give him no right to sell the book with the contributions included.

      So either way, the author has no right to sell copies of the edited book, via Lulu or otherwise.

      Yay for unintended consequences. People should think twice before using a Creative Commons license that includes "nc" or "nd" terms. In addition to making the work non-free, they can lead to consequences like these.
    16. Re:Cheap publicity. by mhall119 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You didn't get your check?

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    17. Re:Cheap publicity. by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      Slashdot pays in "goods and services".....it's a barter system. In return for contributing to the community, they provide a place for you to contribute and poorly editted summaries on which to comment (since no one really reads the articles, the comments *MUST* be about the summaries).

      Layne

    18. Re:Cheap publicity. by pbhj · · Score: 1

      He are referring to people as an amorphous blob of free editing goodness, it's a capitalist thing!

      Me, I'm just trying to be annoying.

    19. Re:Cheap publicity. by Odinson · · Score: 4, Interesting
      My cut is $3.30 if it's sold from Lulu, and $.48 cents for books sold from Barnes and Noble. After three two four years of writing, editing, and a month of working the Kinks out of Lulu, I have sold exactly 23 books. Half of those I bought, and mailed to the heavy editors to say thanks. Reviews have been great, so all I can think is people just don't take CC/Lulu authors seriously. Not a good sign for those west coast haters out there.

      Since you can download it for free, best I can figure is I really just did this for the Slashdot Karma. :)

    20. Re:Cheap publicity. by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought. A community developed "NC-ND" work is a tough sell to make to users. I recall the days when Red Hat actually bundled $80 distributions of their OS and sold them retail... and then learning that I could request a CD for the cost of copying and mailing a CD.

      I belief that the principle author would have as much of a right to profit from sales of this thing through Lulu.com as his contributors. And I hope that he kept track of his contributors so that they each get an acknowledgments in the book notes.

      On the other hand... my Creative Commons novel (see sig) is not open to be community developed, but anybody who has read it and made useful comments to me will get an acknowledgment the next time I release a revision.

      Seriously, I think the notion of Community novels is a wonderful idea. But what I wish for is an faceless Corporation to manage the economic aspects of it and allow the contributors to log hours "donated" to the works that are in development. I would then like to see them paid proportionally for profits garnered from dead-tree sales of the books that they contributed to. I would also like to see participants receive an Open Source tax rebate for hours contributed (time * payrate) because ultimately a novel that is developed with the Creative Commons license has the potential to create a good amount of social value for the benefit of society.

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    21. Re:Cheap publicity. by Kamikaze+Chipmunk · · Score: 3, Funny

      We tried to cut you a check, but oddly couldn't find your contact information.

      --
      If government were a product, selling it would be illegal. - P.J. O'Rourke
    22. Re:Cheap publicity. by fyoder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Slashdot pays in "goods and services".....it's a barter system. In return for contributing to the community, they provide a place for you to contribute and poorly editted summaries on which to comment (since no one really reads the articles, the comments *MUST* be about the summaries). Reminds me of the old internet ethic, 'If you take from the internet, give back to the internet.' Then AOL let their users online and it became 'If you pay AOL, everyone on the internet owes you everything for free.' I liked the first version better.
      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    23. Re:Cheap publicity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the author had instead used CC-by-nc-sa, the "community contributions" would fall under the same license, which would give him no right to sell the book with the contributions included. The copyright holder can do whatever the hell they like with their stuff. The CC (and all copyright) licenses regulates what everyone else can do with it.
    24. Re:Cheap publicity. by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the comments are the *only* reason people come to Slashdot, given that half the commenters don't read the summary, much less TFA.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    25. Re:Cheap publicity. by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is exactly the point. Publishing is not being crowdsourced; editing is. The resulting work is publicly available for ANYONE to take and print under their own ISBN; in this case, it is the person who originated the project who decided to monetize it through publication. Hopefully he'll roll the profits back into the site to help foster future such projects -- but that's his choice. He could just as easily pocket the profits. If he does this, the rest of his team is within their rights to fork the project and produce their own in-print copy (with edits if desired).

    26. Re:Cheap publicity. by dch24 · · Score: 1

      I've enjoyed the book. I read it last year and I should read it again just to see what's changed. Thanks for all the work you've done!

    27. Re:Cheap publicity. by Josh+Triplett · · Score: 1

      If the author had instead used CC-by-nc-sa, the "community contributions" would fall under the same license, which would give him no right to sell the book with the contributions included. The copyright holder can do whatever the hell they like with their stuff. The CC (and all copyright) licenses regulates what everyone else can do with it. Which gives the author the right to sell his own work, with all of the community contributions stripped out, if he tracked them well enough to do that. It does *not* give him the right to sell all the community contributions, because the contributors individually own the copyrights on their contributions.
  6. No Derivative Works + Edits? by not_surt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Aren't they somewhat contrary?

    1. Re:No Derivative Works + Edits? by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Aren't they somewhat contrary?

      The finer points of the license only apply to people who aren't the copyright holders. Copyright holders can do whatever they want.

    2. Re:No Derivative Works + Edits? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Presumably, the edits are under someone else's copyright.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  7. At least we now have a new notch on the scale by stoofa · · Score: 2, Funny

    Infinite number of monkeys = Entire works of Shakepeare.

    'Tens of thousands' = Thicker than blood.

    1. Re:At least we now have a new notch on the scale by Guspaz · · Score: 2, Funny

      An infinite number of monkeys given an infinite amount of time would more likely produce infinitely many pages filled with the letter "e". Apparently they like to hold down the buttons.

    2. Re:At least we now have a new notch on the scale by stoofa · · Score: 4, Funny

      But infinity being what it is they would also produce Shakespeare and thicker than blood.

      You obviously wouldn't publish anything from their 'e' period.

    3. Re:At least we now have a new notch on the scale by thermian · · Score: 2, Funny

      I read a quote somewhere that said 'the Internet has finally disproved the hypothesis of an infinite number of monkeys being able to recreate the complete works of shakespeare.'

      Sounds right to me.

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    4. Re:At least we now have a new notch on the scale by gsslay · · Score: 1

      Infinity being what it is; at some point their 'e' period would be translatable into a great work of fiction you'd be happy to publish. It may even translate into Shakespeare and Thicker Than Blood.

      As indeed this will.

    5. Re:At least we now have a new notch on the scale by stoofa · · Score: 1

      As indeed this will. A very good point. I will stick all my posts under a 'no commercial' license in future to stop people selling their replies. I could just add 'no derivatives' and prevent any replies at all.
    6. Re:At least we now have a new notch on the scale by stoofa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dear Impatient Sub-editor,

      On behalf of the infinite number of monkeys, can I point out that we haven't been given an infinite amount of time yet.

    7. Re:At least we now have a new notch on the scale by gsslay · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pity. At some point in infinity I see your two above sentence being a chick-lit blockbuster, selling well in spaceports in the lly language of sector 8662 in the year 2987622224.

      Not enough sex though, and the ending is a bit rushed. But Simian Book Review of The Month said 'eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee', and reviews don't come any better than that!

    8. Re:At least we now have a new notch on the scale by stoofa · · Score: 1

      Not enough sex though What do you mean?

      It started with "A very good point. I will stick..."

      Sounds filthy to me. Still, very pleased with the 'eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee' review. I would like a cryogenically defrosted De Niro to play my posts in the film version.
    9. Re:At least we now have a new notch on the scale by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

      Dear Impatient Sub-editor, One behalf of the infinite number of monkeys, can I point out that we haven't been given an infinite amount of time bleq.

    10. Re:At least we now have a new notch on the scale by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      No an its an infinite number of monkeys given a finite amount of time (specifically that required to type the number of characters in Shakespeare).
      Alternatively a single monkey with an infinite amount of time would produce the entire works of Shakespeare.

      An infinite number of monkeys with infinite amount of time would produce an infinite number of copies of Shakespeare work, and an infinite number of derivatives (some of which would be finitely better, but people poorly versed in infinity would claim to be infinitely better)

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    11. Re:At least we now have a new notch on the scale by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Dear monkey, may i point out due to the infinite number of you you dont need infinite time yet, merely enough time to write out one copy of one work by Francis bacons each, and collate them Alternatively you could each write one chapter and collate all the chapters, but i suppose that's a managerial decision.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    12. Re:At least we now have a new notch on the scale by Fierlo · · Score: 1

      'Ten monkeys over, say, Columbus Day Weekend' = Dan Brown

    13. Re:At least we now have a new notch on the scale by SpectreHiro · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dear Infinite Monkeys,

      We regret to inform you that we already have ample copies of Shakespeare's works, as well as numerous duplication technologies which are significantly faster and less expensive than retaining your services. Further, our legal department informs us that duplication of more modern works which might be of more value to us in the market-place would in most cases violate Copyright law, regardless of the manner in which these duplicates were produced.

      In short, your services will no longer be required. You may collect your payment for this incomplete work week before being escorted from the premises, and the corporation will further provide you with three months worth of severance bananas, as per the stipulations of your original employment agreement.

      Thank you very much for your tireless efforts (as illegible as the fruits of those efforts may have been), and we sincerely wish you well in all your further endeavors.

      Sincerely,

      The Management

      --
      You can't win, Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    14. Re:At least we now have a new notch on the scale by stoofa · · Score: 1

      Hmmmmmmm,

      But have we given you the one that goes 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa' yet? It is a little similar to 'eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee' but comes at it from a whole new view point. The underlying ennui holds the reader subdued yet strangely hooked.

      When the denouement finally arrives it is completely shocking and yet feels timeless. I won't spoil it by saying what happens... oh, alright, it goes 'aaaa.'

      The Monkeys.

    15. Re:At least we now have a new notch on the scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't I reply to this post?

    16. Re:At least we now have a new notch on the scale by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Strictly speaking, we have empirical evidence that the entire works of Shakespeare can be produced by a finite amount of monkeys in a finite amount of time.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    17. Re:At least we now have a new notch on the scale by uniquegeek · · Score: 1

      With or without the liquor?

  8. Community edited by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    And the community didn't say anything about naming the main character "Joe"?

  9. First on-line work of fiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This perhaps?

  10. Peter Watts by pionzypher · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Rifter series was released circa 2001 or so and is available at rifters.com for free under a CC licence IIRC. However, I'm fairly sure Watts used a publisher for the back end stuff.

    Congrats, and thank you for looking to publish in this manner.

    --
    I'll believe in corporations having personhood when Texas executes one... - advocate_one
    1. Re:Peter Watts by bcrowell · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are quite a few professional authors releasing fiction under some kind of CC license. Cory Doctorow, Rudy Rucker, Karl Schroeder, Peter Watts, and Charles Stross are some of the better known SF pros who are doing this. Bruce Sterling has released some nonfiction under a CC license. Other, less well known professionally published authors are trying it as well, e.g., Rick Dakan, Mike Brotherton, Jim Munroe.

      I'm not sure what's so notable about the "community-edited" part. It sounds like an attempt to make a false analogy between fiction writing and software development. Software is a tool, so the "with enough eyeballs, all bugs become shallow" concept makes sense; if it's broken, people can help you fix it. Fiction isn't a tool. The difference between a good novel and a bad novel isn't just that there are typos here and there. There's also a massive oversupply of people who think they can write fiction, so it's not exactly exciting news that someone is willing to give me his novel for free. Slush pile editors get paid to read unpublished fiction all day, and at night they go home bleary-eyed and debating whether to slit their wrists.

      One similarity that does exist between fiction writing and software hacking is that they both require a large amount of practice to get good at. I collected about forty rejection slips on about a dozen pieces of short fiction before making my first sale. If the OP really wants to get to the point where he can reach an audience with his science fiction, I'd advise him to look into some online groups where he can get feedback on his work. Two good communities are critters.org and the Baen's Universe e-slush board. I also benefited a lot from attending one of the Clarion workshops.

      I think the analogy with open-source software works much better for nonfiction, and it's also with nonfiction that you can actually hope to reach a significant audience without going through a traditional publisher.

    2. Re:Peter Watts by Odinson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This post is one of the better ones I have read. I may not be brilliant, but I'm smart enough to know no matter what I say there is a grains of truth to this. Except this part.

      "I'm not sure what's so notable about the "community-edited" part. It sounds like an attempt to make a false analogy between fiction writing and software development."

      It may seem like that, but based on my experience I respectfully disagree. You may have weighed the cost benefit of paying an editor over asking a group of people for help for yourself, but getting other smart people involved with the book has helped me and the book in many ways. Ways I am certain a single editor could not have. They may not be mutually exclusive, but I think the book has come far enough that I don't need that step.

      Here are a few examples of what I mean.

      1. I have learned a number of grammatical rules I did not know before. A paid editor would simply have washed them away for me.
      2. I have engaged groups of people knowlagable in the arts and sciences who where also familiar with the book before it went stable. This helped correct errors in this book and gives me ideas for future works.
      3. I got to review every change making it easier to keep continuity in a series.
      4. Because of the period of public transition (peer review) I was able to discuss or even test the science in the book. I think many a slashdoter will agree that the many websites dedicated to really bad science in science fiction are both hilarious and humiliating for the authors.
      And this part.

      "There's also a massive oversupply of people who think they can write fiction, so it's not exactly exciting news that someone is willing to give me his novel for free."

      Don't assume that just because something is gratis that it sucks. An open source nerd should know better. Where am I? Slashdot or the Time Warner boardroom?

  11. Mine... all mine! by DeadlyEmbrace · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hereby proclaim the internet (which I invented) and all data stored therein under the rule of by-nc-nd CC license. Feel free to comment towards its betterment and send me the royalties!

  12. It's been done before by jamesh · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's been done before, in fact it happened to some friends of a friend of mine, they didn't like each other very much and were made to write a story together, alternating paragraph by paragraph... it went something like this:

    At first, Laurie couldn't decide which kind of tea she wanted. The camomile, which used to be her favorite for lazy evenings at home, now reminded her too much of Carl, who once said, in happier times, that he liked camomile. But she felt she must now, at all costs, keep her mind off Carl. His possessiveness was suffocating, and if she thought about him too much her asthma started acting up again. So camomile was out of the question.

    Meanwhile, Advance Sergeant Carl Harris, leader of the attack squadron now in orbit over Skylon 4, had more important things to think about than the neuroses of an air-headed bimbo named Laurie with whom he had spent one sweaty night over a year ago. "A.S. Harris to Geostation 17," he said into his transgalactic communicator. "Polar orbit established. No sign of resistance so far..." But before he could sign off a bluish particle beam flashed out of nowhere and blasted a hole through his ship's cargo bay. The jolt from the direct hit sent him flying out of his seat and across the cockpit.

    He bumped his head and died almost immediately, but not before he felt one last pang of regret for psychically brutalizing the one woman who had ever had feelings for him. Soon afterwards, Earth stopped its pointless hostilities towards the peaceful farmers of Skylon 4. "Congress Passes Law Permanently Abolishing War and Space Travel," Laurie read in her newspaper one morning. The news simultaneously excited her and bored her. She stared out the window, dreaming of her youth -- when the days had passed unhurriedly and carefree, with no newspapers to read, no television to distract her from her sense of innocent wonder at all the beautiful things around her. "Why must one lose one's innocence to become a woman?" she pondered wistfully.

    Little did she know, but she has less than 10 seconds to live. Thousands of miles above the city, the Anu'udrian mothership launched the first of its lithium fusion missiles. The dim-witted wimpy peaceniks who pushed the Unilateral Aerospace Disarmament Treaty through Congress had left Earth a defenseless target for the hostile alien empires who were determined to destroy the human race. Within two hours after the passage of the treaty the Anu'udrian ships were on course for Earth, carrying enough firepower to pulverize the entire planet. With no one to stop them they swiftly initiated their diabolical plan. The lithium fusion missile entered the atmosphere unimpeded. The President, in his top-secret mobile submarine headquarters on the ocean floor off the coast of Guam, felt the inconceivably massive explosion which vaporized Laurie and 85 million other Americans. The President slammed his fist on the conference table. "We can't allow this! I'm going to veto that treaty! Let's blow 'em out of the sky!"

    This is absurd. I refuse to continue this mockery of literature. My writing partner is a violent, chauvinistic, semi-literate adolescent.

    Yeah? Well, you're a self-centered tedious neurotic whose attempts at writing are the literary equivalent of Valium.

    You total $*&.

    Stupid %&#$!.

    1. Re:It's been done before by AlterRNow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At least that kept me reading from start to finish. In some books the first 2 paragraphs nearly force you to put the book down.

      --
      The disappearing pencil trick. Let me show you it.
    2. Re:It's been done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would buy this book.

    3. Re:It's been done before by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Me too! I was laughing my ass off! I want more :(

      Those paragraphs had more funny in them than ten "romantic comedies" put together.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:It's been done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      omigod this is a stunning piece of work

  13. are there branches of the main trunk? by tommeke100 · · Score: 1

    There must be tons of alternative endings. Makes me think of those adventure books where every paragraph you decide yourself which turn the story is taking.

  14. by-nc-nd? Community edited? by WK2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How can a community edited work be published under by-nc-ND? The nd means "no derivative" which means that the public can't distribute modified works. When he says, "community edited" does he mean a private community? Also, according the the website, they are selling this book, which you can't do if it is by-NC-nd, where the NC means non-commercial. If it was community edited, you would need permission from every copyright holder (which might mean a lot) if you want a different license.

    With so many things left unanswered, how can we answer this guy's question?

    --
    Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
    1. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by WWWWolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      How can a community edited work be published under by-nc-ND?

      With the permission from the community in question. You need to make distinction between creators of the work and the public that uses and distributes the work. One would assume that if they get contributors aboard, each of them will understand what they're going to do with the work, right?

      Star Wreck: In the Pirkinning was released under BY-NC-ND, and was definitely a "community work" in every sense of the expression. It's also sold on DVD, for profit - by the creators. -NC just means you aren't allowed to make a copy and then sell it yourself.

    2. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      I assume that ol' Pimpson here published his original draft as by-nc-nd, but that the edits that he received came with no such restrictions themselves. I say "assume" in the full knowledge that I may be making both of the contributors and me.

      Actually, what I really assume is that he doesn't really give a Goddamn about licensing, and is just using Slashdot to pimp the sweat of other peoples' brows. But then I'm kind of a dick that way.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by Enleth · · Score: 1

      Repeat after me: a license does not apply to the copyright holder.

      That's why Qt can be dual-licensed, that's why a book published under by-nb can be sold by the copyright holder, that's why the copyroght holder can do whatever he wants with the work, even disregarding the license completely - because he's not bound by it.

      --
      This is Slashdot. Common sense is futile. You will be modded down.
    4. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by Markusis · · Score: 5, Informative

      I am one of the community editors for this book. My name is listed in the acknowledgments.

      First let me say that the book is awesome. It's got a great plot, great characters, and it pulls you in. A few times I was late to work by a few minutes because I just couldn't put the book down until I finished the chapter I was reading. I highly recommend it.

      Now, let me explain how I helped edit the book. I can't speak for the other editors, but this is how I got involved. I decided I was going to read the book, so I downloaded it and started reading. I find that I'm pretty good at finding typos and grammatical errors in books. I find them in books that are published by the big publishers & authors all the time. I usually find at least one or two mistakes in every book I read. When I was reading thicker than blood I just started keeping track of everything that I knew was misspelled or grammatically incorrect and everything that I was unsure of as well. When I had finished the book I found that I had nearly 200 edits, so I sent them over to the author. He was very grateful and a few months later he sent me a printed copy of his book.

      So, the 'nd' doesn't really apply because I never made a derivative work, I just sent him a patch that was human-readable-only. The changes that I made are so small that copyright doesn't apply to my changes. I mean, I would assign him the copyright if it did matter, but such a small change would not trigger copyright. If I had rewritten a few paragraphs or added any real substance it may have, but fixing typos and making sure apostrophes are placed correctly does not deserve any attention from copyright. These are the contributions that I made and I can not speak for other editors.

      Again, I can't recommend the book enough. I can't wait for the sequel.

      Mark Drago.

    5. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Repeat after me: a license does not apply to the copyright holder.

      Read the post douche.

    6. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by genderbunny · · Score: 1

      Editing a book isn't like editing Wikipedia. It means "proofread for the purposes of quality control," not "create derivative versions."

    7. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by Odinson · · Score: 3, Informative
      The book was posted by me.

      The book was released under that license from the start. I was originally planning on getting it published by a traditional (see fearful) publisher and didn't want to do anything to risk a potential deal. I just couldn't stand the thought of someone buying it and sitting on it. (Which happens all the time)

      I the complete draft. A dozen people submitting edits on their own. Some of the contributions just emails with lists of hundreds of edits per post. None of which where solicited beyond 'if you find any errors' It *WAS NOT* the original plan to have this book be community edited.

      BTW I can count the number of books I have sold on my fingers and toes. I just put it up on Lulu and bought an ISBN. When I realized the CC+CE+fiction+novel might be the case I tried to verify it and could not get a affirmative response from CC community list or many people I emailed. Only a group this large could have affirmed this.

    8. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by Odinson · · Score: 1
      Editing a book isn't like editing Wikipedia. It means "proofread for the purposes of quality control," not "create derivative versions."

      Well said. This is not non-fiction. Non-fiction can have two contributers resolve disputes through civil discourse about the nature of the truth. Fiction is a lie. How would you resolve plot direction? Who can type faster?

    9. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Is this serious science fiction or one of those lame "The adventures of tough-guy Brace Masterson as he journeys around the universe fighting aliens and making love to beautiful women" pulp turds? Because if it's the latter, why even bother with a license?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    10. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by Odinson · · Score: 2, Informative
      As far as I know, this entire book is hard science fiction. It's set only 4-10 years in the future.

      Here is a pertinent (and my first) review.

      (and my first) review.

      On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Chris Knadle wrote:

      Hey, Matt.

      Okay -- I love the book. I finished it in three days and I wanted to finish it earlier. :-) I think the book is "good scifi" in all of the important ways -- it's got some geeky detail, it's got plot, it's got character development, and each character has some quirks, just like you'd find in real life. In all honesty you've got a great book here. I loved the dedications page. I was happily surprised to even be on it -- that was neat! I'm especially interested to hear who Shotgun Trucker is now. :-)

    11. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by AikonMGB · · Score: 1

      I do not think "community edited" means what the author thinks it means.. it seems that he wrote a novel draft and released it online. He allowed people to send him comments/corrections etc., which he would either implement or not at his own discretion.

      This makes him the copyright holder, meaning he can release the work under whatever license he wants. You may want to check out a very similar situation where the work is available under a CC-by-nc license and yet is also sold commercially by the copyright holder.

      Aikon-

    12. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by Martigens · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Then it sounds to me like the community edits were copy-edits, rather a replacement for the kind of work a professional fiction editor would do. Even if the comments went into detail about plot holes etc, it sounds a bit more like a workshop-type interaction where participants critique the author's work (except that usually it's also vice versa).

      You're probably aware that there are several long-running writing workshops dedicated to SF/F. These are 'communities' who provide 'edits' of the sort you describe. Have none of the resulting novels ever been released under a CC license? Did no CC-releasing author ever workshop their book in some kind of a community?

    13. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by Angostura · · Score: 1

      I think the author's interpretation of 'community edited' is perfectly reasonable. As you say, he wrote it and asked others to edit it.

    14. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      just couldn't stand the thought of someone buying it and sitting on it. (Which happens all the time)

      Um, not in fiction it doesn't. If a trad. publisher acquires your novel, they're going to pay you an advance on royalties. They gain nothing by not publishing your book. Your publication date will be in your contract along with a line that says they have a set time in which to publish your book. 2 years is what I see in my contracts. If they don't, all rights revert to you. That language is usually boilerplate. It's there to protect the publisher and you in case of, say, bankruptcy or some other controvery. I've sold and contracted now 8 novels and never ever had one not get printed. And, I don't personally know of any author who's had this happen to him or her, and since I'm in the writing business, I do know a lot of authors. Really, truly, this doesn't happen all the time so don't let that fear hold you back.

      The routes to traditional publishing are diversifying all the time. If you have verifiable sales in the thousands then chances are someone at one of the trad publishers is paying attention. POD isn't a bar to publishing. Crappy writing and/or a poor story are.

      The issue for you is going to be what rights you have to license to a publisher. If you released under a CC, you may not have rights a traditional publisher can acquire. But that won't stop an editor from asking what else you have.

      Good luck with your writing endeavors!

    15. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      Odinson,

      I think I am in a similar situation as you. I posted a draft of a novel that I am working on last year and have gotten feedback from a small crowd that have read some of what I've written. I hope that you'll take a look at my other post on this thread, but suffice it to say I think what you are doing is a great thing.

      In the meantime, there was a point in time where my novel was picked up by the author of printpusher.com and I have gained a little extra publicity by getting linked on there.

      But I guess the thrust of this message is to ask if you see Community developed novels as being an economically viable business model (or at the very least, if you enjoy the interaction of writing in a community to do it for the love of writing).

      Personally, I would love to see writing projects become community-based in the future.

      -Rob

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    16. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "Your publication date will be in your contract along with a line that says they have a set time in which to publish your book. 2 years is what I see in my contracts. If they don't, all rights revert to you."

      If they *do* publish it, and then *stop*... that's "sitting on it". I know this happens to musicians in P&D deals. If book publishers don't do the same, they need a lesson in slimeball :-)

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    17. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Repeat after me: a license does not apply to the copyright holder.

      a license does not apply to the copyright holder.

      But can we be so sure that the author is the only copyright owner, not any of the editors? I'd like to see the copyright assignment terms for this project.

    18. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's somewhere in between the two, and worse for it.

    19. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by RyuMaou · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's cool that you're an established author who did one CC! What are your other books? Can we find them via Amazon.com? If not, where can we find them?

      --
      Oh, the trials and tribulations of a network geek! Read about them at: http://www.ryumaou.com/hoffman/netgeek/
    20. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by Odinson · · Score: 1

      Alas no. This is my first book. I am a really an open source enthusiast who thinks he has a new perspective on how nanotech is going to go. I'm a sysadmin in my day job, which I am dodging today, (sorry.) I also founded and run a LUG.

      I'm mostly concerned about monoculture, and the horrific wars that break out every other generation or so. Those wars usually correlate roughly to swaths of disruptive technologies as freshly impoverished governments bet they can develop the warfare applications of the new technology faster than their enemies.

      The villains are ex-military, moral relativists, gone intellectual property lawyer. That should give you a hint where I am going with the series.

    21. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by RyuMaou · · Score: 1

      Oh, I misunderstood the "number of books sold" comment! I thought you meant other books you'd written and sold to mainstream publishers. Sorry, my bad! (And, here I was about to commend you for "one-upping" Cory Doctorow in the open literature arena!)

      Ah, well, good luck with this one, anyway. Who knows, it may lead to a change in careers!

      --
      Oh, the trials and tribulations of a network geek! Read about them at: http://www.ryumaou.com/hoffman/netgeek/
    22. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by Odinson · · Score: 1
      So far community support for community members becoming writers is great locally and horrific globally. It makes sense with current media distribution. People have gotten used to being told what to read. Most authors know the key to getting read is reviews, reviews, reviews.

      There is a guild that believes and pushes the idea that if a publisher of sufficient size doesn't pick you up, the content is crap. They push that idea on others. Any truth to that keeled over with the Internet and the release of licenses like CC. I think the key to getting it moving is getting people you know personally involved.

      In addition it's especially important for science fiction writers to work a crowd who is both scientifically literate, and knows your ideas and/or work. Technology just gets more complex over time, and people who claim to know everything are hiding something (probably quite a bit.) No one person can really keep up with all the current tech, much less extrapolate it alone.

      As for economic viability (a decent living for sci-fi writers) it needs a sea change. 'Oh good books can be free.' and a popularity boost since commodity info seems to shrink profitability by and order of magnitude 100k book becomes 10k book.

      Right now you can post on the net under a CC and POD it, but it seems like you need to keep your day job too. :(

      But WTHDIK? I'm just starting out myself. :)

    23. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      Well, despite not being picked up by a major publisher I am willing to bet you'll see at least one or two thousand Slashdot readers buy your book from Lulu.com after this article. By my calculation that will net you about $10k in revenue, which isn't bad for a day of sales for an author that isn't established.

      Then again, I would take fame and recognition over money. It would be an honor just to know 2,000 people had read my work.

      I agree about keeping the day job. But the *dream* is to be able to quit it and spend the rest of my days on more (personally) worthwhile pursuits.

      ===

      But talking about the "collaborative novel", am I to understand that the story is all yours and you just used the experience of friends, family, and acquaintances to help refine it along the way? Because it so, I have done something very similar. I relied on my girlfriend and sister early on to help shape some major plot decisions... and lately have been participating in a writer's group with others who are interested in publishing their own work. It is very worthwhile and *that* has helped me make new friends AND given me insights on how to be a better writer. :)

      In any case, I will definitely pick up your manuscript and give it a go one of these days. I look forward to it.

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    24. Re:by-nc-nd? Community edited? by Odinson · · Score: 1

      I consider it an honor to be read as well. It's a good thing, because I've sold a few dozen books at this point. I think some people here took the 'opportunism' claim of some posts here seriously. It was nice to discuss the book in public but this was really about due diligence for a press release.

      On the other hand the Slashdoting resulted in roughly 10,000 new downloads. I would guess based on the way the traffic is changing that maybe a tenth of those people actually intend to read it and half of those have a hope of accomplishing that. We are all busy professionals after all.

      My ideal scenario is one, just one Slashdot member, writes a review of the book and submits it, then the busy folks out there might realize that this book is worthwhile. It's tough fighting both the tide of vanity books, and the groupthink that any worthwhile book would have been picked up by now (for some value of 'by now')

      I can't explain exactly why I haven't tried that hard to find a publisher, but my gut tells me I shouldn't look that hard yet. Maybe it's as simple as most agents/houses want you to send them a pile of dead trees, and that seems so old fashioned and backward to me that I couldn't be bothered. Especially since even established writers may need to do that fifty times before getting a nibble. It doesn't fit in with the book at all. Not only is it a polished .pdf with a cover by a real artist, but I have the source .tex file on the server too. It's a 1.4 meg file that is ready to go more or less as is. What the hell is wrong with people! I can't just email the URL to you? That's not my world. Like a fish out of water.

      I agree about the value of editorial collaboration. The editors, fans, family and even passers by have helped a lot with not only this book, but my ability to continue writing. Open editing improves the story and the writer as a pair. Having someone work over my story without including me seems creepy to me now.

      The story was completely mine. It was a posted as a complete manuscript. But many details have been refined, and my ideas for the series have grown a lot. Regardless of what people think of this book, I can tell (16 chapters so far) the next one will be much better!

      BTW I linked to your book on the site. :)

  15. Naked Came the Stranger by gruntled · · Score: 1

    There have been a number of collaborative works published in the past (though not in the precise way you're decribing). In 1969, a couple of dozen reporters at Newsweek each wrote a chapter for a novel, "Naked Came the Stranger." (it was however, a spoof designed to demonstrate that it didn't matter how lousy the book was, if it had a lot of sex in it it would sell). Author was listed as "Penelope Ashe."

    A similar spoof book, Atlanta Nights, put together by a bunch of science fiction writers to demonstrate that a vanity press Publish America, would print anything, was eventually self-published through an on demand publisher, Lulu.com

    1. Re:Naked Came the Stranger by The+Bender · · Score: 1

      I thought that the whole point of a vanity press was that they would print anything.

      I can't imagine anything more demoralizing than finding out that that you can't even pay someone to publish your work.

    2. Re:Naked Came the Stranger by ushering05401 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The publisher in question was different from most Vanity Presses in that they advertised for submissions, provided super-positive feedback from 'real critics,' and only after leading the authors to believe they were about to strike it rich would they ask for money to subsidize the publishing.

      The sci-fi authors were outing the scam.

      It was kinda like those Nigerian guys who need your account info, only the money they are going to give you is going to come from your soon to be bestseller instead of a disused slush account.

    3. Re:Naked Came the Stranger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naked, the stranger came

    4. Re:Naked Came the Stranger by Pembers · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much the definition of a vanity press. PublishAmerica (who were nearly duped into publishing Atlanta Nights) are just a bit better known than most.

      No one will admit to running a vanity press, which is why they have to be exposed, and naive authors warned against them.

      There are legitimate companies where you can pay to have your book published, but these guys are up-front about what they offer and how much it costs. They don't pretend to be choosy about what they print. (400 pages of /dev/urandom? No problem.) They also tend to be realistic about your chances of having a bestseller, or even turning a profit (comparable to the odds of finding Hamlet's soliloquy in those 400 pages).

  16. License violation by author? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't using nc a de facto CC violation because the author is selling the book for profit?

    1. Re:License violation by author? by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Nope. Copyright holders can do whatever they want with their works.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    2. Re:License violation by author? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But not with the other submitters' contributions, which as derivative works are also under the same non-commercial license. This is why the non-commercial variants of Creative Commons suck, and why we have "no discrimination against fields of endeavour" in the open source definition.

    3. Re:License violation by author? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Nope. Copyright holders can do whatever they want with their works. "Holders", plural, I see. In the case of a work of joint authorship, does it take the permission of one author or of all authors?
  17. Maybe the oldest one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Perhaps the oldest Community Edited work of fiction is the Bible...not sure that it is CC licenced though.

    1. Re:Maybe the oldest one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this modded insightful?

    2. Re:Maybe the oldest one by c_sd_m · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the oldest Community Edited work of fiction is the Bible...not sure that it is CC licenced though. It doesn't matter, the copyright has definitely expired by now.
    3. Re:Maybe the oldest one by SpectreHiro · · Score: 1

      Actually, that would depend on what the Copyright laws were like at the time of the original publishing. If they used anything like our current term limits (author's life + 70 years), then it would still be under protection, seeing as how it's the literal word of God...

      Unless Nietzsche was right, of course. If his pronouncement of God's death was correct and in a timely manner, then the Bible would've been in the public domain for 30-40 years at least.

      Hmmm... I wonder what the Bible has to say about Copyright?

      --
      You can't win, Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  18. Tens of thousands of others to get a solid draft? by stoofa · · Score: 1

    Okay, so we all know that Rembrandt didn't colour in his entire canvas and just did the hands, faces and really very fiddly bits of cloth.

    And authors have editors who hone and tweak their prose.

    And from a conceptual point of view I genuinely am fascinated with a community-driven work of fiction...

    But still, saying that the draft became solid after the help from thousands of others... doesn't that speak volumes?

  19. Possibly... by icebrain · · Score: 1

    Stuart Slade wrote The Big One and other books in that timeline as a series of chapters on a message board. People would then comment on it and so forth. He once explained why the print version had so many typos in it, but I forget what the reason was.

    There are still stories being written for it, too.

    --
    The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
  20. First community driven book? by stpk4 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wouldn't that be the Bible? = )

    1. Re:First community driven book? by $0.02 · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't. It wouold be The Epic of Gilgamesh.

      --
      If enithin kan gow rong it whil. (Murfey)
    2. Re:First community driven book? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to Parry and Lord, epic poetry began as oral narrative verse passed down from one poet to another, with each one adding his own material. The most significant such poetry is that attributed to Homer, the Iliad and the Odyssey, which date to around 750 bc and 700 bc, with the final redaction traditionally dated to the reign of the Athenian Tyrant Peisistratos (6th century bc). Now, the oldest elements of the Old Testament probably date no earlier than the 10 century bc, with the majority of it written by the 4th century bc.

    3. Re:First community driven book? by genderbunny · · Score: 1

      Bah. Everyone knows that it's not really community-driven unless it has a Creative Commons license.

    4. Re:First community driven book? by 2short · · Score: 1

      No, it wouldn't be. The world is older than your religion, and both the Egyptians and Sumerians produced earlier folk tale anthologies.

  21. Not the first book by benwiggy · · Score: 2, Informative

    The King James Bible was created by committee - perhaps the only example of a worthwhile achievement implemented by one. (Though, in fairness, they didn't make it Creative Commons.)

    1. Re:Not the first book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The King James Bible was created by committee - perhaps the only example of a worthwhile achievement implemented by one. (Though, in fairness, they didn't make it Creative Commons.) I think your definition of 'worthwhile' significantly differs from mine. I admit it is good for a laugh once in a while but is mostly annoying.
    2. Re:Not the first book by maxume · · Score: 1

      Didn't they still stick pretty close to Constantine?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Not the first book by benwiggy · · Score: 1
      They stuck pretty close to Matthew Tindale's earlier English translation, (he invented lots of English words, such as "Sabbath"), which was itself a fair translation of the Vulgate, compiled by St. Jerome.

      Not sure what Constantine had to do with it.

      But I digress....

    4. Re:Not the first book by maxume · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Development_of_the_Old_Testament_canon#Constantine_the_Great

      (I'm not citing that as authoritative, just as what I am talking about)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Not the first book by benwiggy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, we both have the same definition of worthwhile.

      I'm not talking about the worth of the religious sentiment of the book itself.

      I suggest that particular translation is worthy for its literary merit and cultural impact, irrespective of the Judao-Christian message.

      I suspect that you don't find the book itself annoying - nor good for a laugh - but rather that you might find some people's attitudes and beliefs so, which they claim to have taken from the pages of a bible - not necessarily this one.

  22. Folktales by $0.02 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Folktales, Fairy Tales, Myths, Urban Legends

    --
    If enithin kan gow rong it whil. (Murfey)
  23. BitTorrent download by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://bittornado.com/torrents/Thicker-Than-Blood.pdf.torrent

    Sorry about the off-topic reply, just trying to help people w/ their slow download.

    1. Re:BitTorrent download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      http://bittornado.com/torrents/Thicker-Than-Blood.pdf.torrent

      Sorry about the off-topic reply, just trying to help people w/ their slow download. DANG SPAMMER!!!! NOT ONLY IS IT OFF TOPIC BUT ILLEGAL!!
    2. Re:BitTorrent download by Odinson · · Score: 1
      I'd love to see someone dumb enough to force him to take down a torrent of the book based on some 'pirate' claim. They would be served so fast their head would spin.

      It's good to be on the other side of that. :)

  24. Beowulf? by Cyclopedian · · Score: 1

    Before it was put down in written language, the story of Beowulf was passed down as oral history through several generations. Each generation probably had a hand in changing an aspect of the story, til it became the Beowulf we know today.

    1. Re:Beowulf? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Funny

      Each generation probably had a hand in changing an aspect of the story, til it became the Beowulf we know today.

      Which is a good thing, because it started out as a dirty joke about a guy called Barry.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:Beowulf? by Beorytis · · Score: 1

      I'm not Joe Campbell, but I'll go on a limb and say there has to be a multitude of examples of community-edited fiction bthrough the millenia of human history... The Kalevala? The Bible? Of course none of them relate to TFA because they existed before CC licensing.

  25. Fidonet by fish · · Score: 0

    Me and a bunch of friends wrote a story on Fidonet, must have been around 86. Never got really 'published' though...

  26. Warbreaker by nafhan · · Score: 1

    Brandon Sanderson (the guy finishing up the WOT series) published one of his books, Warbreaker, under a CC license. I think there might be some community editing, but his site is blocked from where I work.
    Great book, by the way!

  27. Not really 'oldest'... by krog · · Score: 1

    The Bible is just one of the oldest legends that had a distro.

  28. meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The flip of a switch gives Joe, an ordinary mechanic, superhuman abilities. He discovers his new powers after his aunt saves his life with restricted nanites. When the corporation sanctioned by the military to control all nanotechnology discovers his secret, everyone he knows is thrust into a world of deception and treason. Can Joe give the people of the world life-saving superhuman powers, or will the attempt claim his life."

    Dude. Seriously?

  29. DjangoBook.com by schmiddy · · Score: 1

    Djangobook.com

    A really great book. Under the GNU FDL, not CC. And the authors maintained pretty strict control over incorporating user comments (i.e. not like wikibooks), so progress was kind of slow, but the quality is good. Last I checked some sections were still unfinished, but it's more than enough to learn all you need to get started with Django.

    --
    http://cltracker.net -- powerful craigslist multi-city search
    1. Re:DjangoBook.com by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      The article is asking particularly about fiction - djangobook is (i hope!) not fiction.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:DjangoBook.com by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Novelas Wiki is also under GFDL.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  30. I did something similar in 2002 by localroger · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This is pretty much how I released MOPI. After putting it online I received hundreds of editing suggestions, many of which I incorporated into the MS. As a result there are only a couple of typos in the printed version, which I'm leaving in because I'd have to get a new ISBN to fix them.

    I didn't use a CC license though the one I drafted for myself is pretty similar. In particular I insisted on reserving print rights for myself. CC seems a bit more intent on making information free than reserving the possibility of future conventional publication.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
    1. Re:I did something similar in 2002 by Odinson · · Score: 1
      Interesting. I was using the ISBN as the indication that the work had gone stable.

      In this case, the editors for TTB understood that this was meant to be sold with their edits.

      It sounds like the kuro5hin crowd was less offended that it was posted at all. :)

    2. Re:I did something similar in 2002 by localroger · · Score: 1
      If you read the fine print a work isn't supposed to be modified after being granted ISBN; if you make edits it's supposed to become a new edition. (In traditional print, after all, this would be an expensive process.) Lulu used to be a bit lenient about that for things like typo corrections but I think they've become a bit pickier if you have global distribution.

      I didn't actively solicit edit suggestions, but I think it's a fundamental rule of nature that if you put something on the internet with a typo, someone will find it and point it out. Many eyes make all bugs shallow and all that. I was surprised at how many were found, considering I'd been sitting on the MS for eight years and had had several very literate people read it critically.

      --
      Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
  31. I've worked on something like that by lbbros · · Score: 1

    Back in 1997, I and my brother had an idea for a short story, which then, over the course of the years, became a sort of novel (link in sig). I decided to make it public once I knew of a CC license, since my idea was roughly like TFA, while I was considering the idea of publishing (I'm on Lulu too, but I haven't got an ISBN - yet).
    Although the idea was to get an input from the community, in the end I almost got zero input, perhaps because of the target people (they mostly come through my illustrator's web page). I found that a certain number of people liked it quite a bit, but very few (if any) decided to speak up and write comments (currently like 1% of the total site visitors have commented, if I exclude people I know who said things to me in person).
    So I can say that overall I'm quite disappointed, although I fully acknowledge that there must be some reason why people aren't saying anything about it.

    --
    A CC-licensed illustrated horror novel
    1. Re:I've worked on something like that by Odinson · · Score: 1
      I think I may be lucky because I know a ton of open source nerds personally. I'm hoping it can become more normal to email a correction to an author when a mistake is found.

      Try promoting it to you local LUG one person at a time. If they get excited about it, they will send you fixes.

  32. This is Slashdot: so... SVN or GIT? by argent · · Score: 1

    No, really, who wants to read the -STABLE version anyway?

    1. Re:This is Slashdot: so... SVN or GIT? by Odinson · · Score: 1

      I glued it together by hand this time around. I'm seriously thinking about using git for the sequel. Mainly for concurrent speed.

  33. Also: Oxford English Dictionary by Hemogoblin · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The Oxford English Dictionary, which was first conceived in the 1850's, was a completely volunteer driven project. It's like the Wikipedia of today, except by mail and 140 years earlier. I read an awesome book about the making of the dictionary, but the title escapes me. I'll quote Wikipedia instead.

    Volunteer readers would copy to quotation slips passages illustrating actual word usages, then post them to the dictionary editor. In 1858, the Society agreed to the project in principle, with the title "A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles" ... ... On 12 May 1860, Coleridge's dictionary plan was published, and research started. His house was the first editorial office. He arrayed 100,000 quotation slips in a 54-pigeon-hole grid. In April 1861, the group published the first sample pages; later that month, the thirty-one-year old Coleridge died of tuberculosis. Apparently the hardest part of the work was finding quotations of some of the simplest words, since everyone was interested in quoting long and complicated words.
    1. Re:Also: Oxford English Dictionary by the+phantom · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The creation of the OED was certainly in interesting effort, but I would not go so far as to say it is like the Wikipedia of its time. The OED was edited an compiled by a very small group of people, who had complete editorial control. Certainly, volunteers submitted words and quotes to the editors, but the editors were ultimately in control over which words and quotes ended up in the dictionary. This is in stark contrast to Wikipedia, where there really isn't any centralized control.

  34. So... are we plugging our "own" novels now? by vorlich · · Score: 2

    "What? You mean like, here on slashdot?" James ejaculated, running his hand along the tapestry bindings of Helena's Prada chaise longue. "Because if we are, I am absolutely convinced that everyone who is anyone shall consider it a tad incestous!"

    Toaster Books is an imprint of The TankTopToolKit Corporation.
    All rights reserved - cue that exciting David Newman fanfare from the start of 20th Century Fox Movies.

    --
    Posts, MyBio or Sig, may contain satire, sarcasm, bolded nouns be sardonic or even witty & be Church of SD
  35. wealth distribution of collective works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    couple of thousands comments...congrats!

    an ongoing similar attempt with respect to videos @ www.vodes.net/lovecake

    the storyline is firm, commnunity input is about "little things" (e.g. sound effect, camera angle). though its about little things, they spice up the video. like salt does to food. size does not always matter.

    whats new?

    perhaps how we distribute the earnings. if there are not enough earnings to cover all contributors, vodes are rewarded in order of its creation date. first create, first serve.

    there is a general reward formula (reward = time * knowledge * quality(rating); expressed in vodes: CV = LV * IV-xxx * q) applicable to all tasks (e.g. people who have helped shooting and editing the video).

    one of the nice things of the formula is that it allows a pluralistic community (team beta tester representing the 5 main stakeholder (production and consumption functions) to collectively and efficiently set certain key wealth distribution values (like the value (in Euro) of time/LV)

    people who invested little time and posted a creative idea get one 1 ID-V (Idea Vode). each idea which makes it in the final version of the "community edition" is being rewarded. how much precisely (in euro) this little grain of salt is worth depends on the outcome of important economic decision_x by team beta tester.

    more on the background @ www.vodes.info (in beta stage)

    P.s.: there are IF-o positions open.

  36. always had a problem with the infinite monkeys by pbhj · · Score: 1

    I guess the issue is that monkeys aren't true random letter generators. Otherwise, I suppose I'd have to go with it, but I still wouldn't like it.

  37. What about.. by SirStiff · · Score: 1

    ..the Bible?

  38. Elonka Dunin did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elonka Dunin, the cryptography one who has been headlined here more than once, did a similar thing with her "The Mammoth Book of Secret Codes and Cryptograms". It has a different title in the UK. The majority of the book was community created and edited, I was one of the ones that took part in it. She used a Wiki to keep it all together and editable. As far as I know everything went great. I never actually picked up a copy of the book though.

  39. Re:What about.. Doh! by SirStiff · · Score: 1

    Yeah.. I see the previous posts now..

  40. Ugh.... by RobBebop · · Score: 1

    If you mod my original post up for insightful comments, mod this one down because of how poorly proof-read is was.

    --
    Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
  41. Alternitive download site. by Odinson · · Score: 1
    Debian is holding up great considering, but that net connection is throttled. You can also download the book from here.

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/34504/Thicker-Than-Blood

  42. Devilbunnies (1993) by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let me introduce you to alt.Devilbunnies , founded in 1993.

    It started as a Usenet newsgroup devoted to nonsense. But sometime around 1993, people began generating a consistent storyline within the newsgroup. (The particulars involved intelligent, man-eating rabbits and their quest to enslave humanity, but that's not important for this discussion.) Before very long, the writers in alt.devilbunnies were creating novel-length stories, often with over a dozen contributors, and all set within an internally consistent shared world.

    The Devilbunnies phenomenon continued from around 1993 to around 2002, when the authors slowly abandoned the newsgroup. There were multiple attempts to bring the Devilbunnies to the web, or to publish their shared stories. But every time someone began such a project, someone in the community would oppose it for one reason or another. Because the copyright on the devilbunny universe was shared between everyone involved, there was no way of publishing or continuing it if even a single person vetoed the project. So those who wanted to make it bigger eventually gave up. Now the devilbunnies are nothing more than a group of friends who fondly remember stories they wrote together but which will never -- *can* never -- live again in any other format.

    I believe alt.Devilbunnies is the first internet-powered collaborative story group. (There are many pre-internet efforts, going all the way to Beowulf and beyond, as others have mentioned.)

    It is also my considered opinion that the fate of Devilbunnies awaits any collaborative story project, unless it is a small, close-knit group who have been told in advance that the project is intended for publication and been given clear rules for how it will be done. Copyright laws are strict enough, and legal expenses great enough, that a single bad egg can ruin an entire collaborative fiction project. So be careful, and don't let what happened to alt.Devilbunnies happen to you.

    Or in other words, keep an eye on your toes, because those wabbits will eat them if you give them half a chance. And keep your fireaxe handy.

    --
    Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    1. Re:Devilbunnies (1993) by Brother+Phil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Reminds me of when Thomas Covenant visited the world of r.h.o.d, and also of "Flowers for Thagernon" - a colaboratively produced pastiche so well written that I was laughing at the puns and distortions as I wept for the protagonist.

    2. Re:Devilbunnies (1993) by Brother+Phil · · Score: 1

      Whoops - minor correction there: Flowers for Thagernon was written by the Oracle. Beautiful work. The rhod/covenant tales were collaborative, though.

  43. VMS Notes by Plekto · · Score: 1

    We did the same thing online in 1991 at my university(technically 1985 or so - way before I got there). We had a 20-30 college mini net - a BBS system of sorts where all of their VMS machines were linked together. Vax Notes it was called.

    Of course there were collaborative forums - it worked identical to Usenet Newsgroups.

    http://www.byeday.net/assets/documents/Camelot%20of%20Collaboration%20Patti%20Anklam.pdf
    This was the very first attempt at something like this. Way before you even had any of the other forums/web/etc. Most people were still grinding away at 300 baud with modems on BBSs and they were running a full Newgroup/chat forum between thousands of people across the world.

    The system still exists as a lot of universities still have an old VMS machines running somewhere. For email and notes, they still work great.

    This is what should be in your article, IMO, as it's fascinating and much more than a simple attribution.

  44. Re:VMS/VAX Notes by Plekto · · Score: 1

    I forgot to add a couple of points of data/history.

    The VMS Notes system ran on most every major original university and institution at the time on the original ARPANET. The university that I went to had a dedicated cable running from it 60 miles to U.C. Berkeley where it tied into the rest of the system(this was done way back in the early 70s when the university was created). As such, we could go to their library computers and reserve books and so on as well, and send inter-campus email. Long, long before you even had what we consider to be email today.

    When the Notes program was created, you could all would participate in the forums, which was unlike a typical BBS in that it worked like a modern forum. Hopping from one forum to another wasn't very hard and nearly every California State and U.C. campus was linked together this way.

    Usenet came much later as a commercial version of the same idea.

    But within this group of VMS systems were created many online novels and works of community fiction, just like you typically get on a forum at most websites today. Some grew into actual published works and were often posted in chapters every few weeks to Usenet writing groups, most notably ones like rec.games.frp Fantasy and science fiction made up the vast majority, of course.

    Unfortunately, modern internet archives only go back to about the mid 90s so virtually all of this has been lost.

    http://www.peldor.com/intro.html
    Some, like this still exist. It started out as a collaborative effort for the first few chapters but then he took over and posted online on Usenet until 2000 or so.(about ten years). His work wasn't the first, though - just a notable example that still survives today.

  45. NaNoWriMo? by keith_nt4 · · Score: 1

    Nation Novel Writing Month has been around for almost 10 years and the authors that participate have been releasing lots of novels under CC for almost all that time. And several of them have been allowing edits along with way as well. How you would find them or search examples I don't know; I suppose you could just ask in the NaNoWriMo forums to see.

    --
    "UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity." -Dennis Ritchie
  46. I found it by computerman413 · · Score: 1

    Here's his contact info: Anonymous Coward 123 Fake Street Anytown, USA 12345 Or call him at 867-5309

  47. Chuck Norris did it first! by Crowdish · · Score: 1

    I believe that THE TRUTH ABOUT CHUCK NORRIS was originally a list that was edited and collaborated on by the Internet community (a slightly immature one, but a community)and later published by some opportunistic bastige!