Slashdot Mirror


Cell Metabolism Artificially Enhanced

NewScientist is reporting that Swiss researchers have shown that a cell's metabolism can be increased without altering the genetic makeup. Small plastic packages of enzymes have been successfully inserted into cells, increasing metabolism. "Meier and colleagues coated their polymer vesicles in a chemical that encouraged human white blood cells called macrophages to engulf them. The small capsules contained enzymes, just like natural organelles. The enzymes chosen produced fluorescent chemicals, signaling they were working without problems inside their new host."

97 comments

  1. wonderful by d3l33t · · Score: 3, Funny

    now people can be lazy AND fit... mark one against global warming

    1. Re:wonderful by eln · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but TFA says that in the future, they may even be able to get human cells to produce energy through photosynthesis. So instead of eating right and exercising, we could all just drag our fat pasty asses outside and...you know, maybe that isn't such a great idea after all.

    2. Re:wonderful by tubapro12 · · Score: 1

      Finally, my idea for a chain of fast food restaurants with no food and skylights will have a niche market!

    3. Re:wonderful by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 1

      We rub the lotion on our skin, or we get the hose again!

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    4. Re:wonderful by TropicalCoder · · Score: 4, Informative

      says that in the future, they may even be able to get human cells to produce energy through photosynthesis.

      I don't think that photosynthesis is efficient enough to provide us with any significant amount of energy. Plants have to increase potentially energy-absorbing surface area by putting our branches to support many leaves. Even so, that still doesn't give them enough energy to even walk around the block, let alone commute to work. When is the last time you saw a plant walking by? Perhaps if you live a very sedentary life style - like maybe a programmer living in his mother's basement - but then again, this type rarely sees the sun anyhow.

    5. Re:wonderful by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Well hopefully even the most sedentary programmer is still thinking, and our brains our one of the biggest energy consumers in our body.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    6. Re:wonderful by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Enhancing cellular metabolism is called Accelerated Metabolism and is actually one of the best powers in the game.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    7. Re:wonderful by spazdor · · Score: 1

      Not me! I'm runnin' Coppermine(TM) neurons!

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    8. Re:wonderful by Original+Replica · · Score: 5, Funny

      they may even be able to get human cells to produce energy through photosynthesis.

      So someday there will green skinned chicks sunbathing their way to ever better levels of physical fitness? The day I see that, I'm totally changing my name to James T. Kirk.

      --
      We are all just people.
    9. Re:wonderful by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      This was a minor point made in the John Scalzi's "Old Man's War" trilogy. One of the books in it was a recent hugo award nominee. If you could bio-engineer people, why not go for some enhancements. Especially for an alien killing soldier.

    10. Re:wonderful by TropicalCoder · · Score: 1

      Well of course. I was reading the other day that the body consumes up to a hundred watts at rest, and the brain - about 15% of that. While I appreciated the mods, I was really trying to be funny. Began the setup by stating the obvious, moved on to the ridiculous, then finished off with an easily identifiable Slashdot archetype. I guess my presentation was a little too dry for the humour to come across. I'll have to work on that :-)

    11. Re:wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      When is the last time you saw a plant walking by? "The base of a triffid is a large muscle-like root mass comprising many thick tentacles. When dormant/docile, these tentacles are rooted into the ground and are used to draw nutrients, as with a normal plant. When active, triffids use these tentacles to propel themselves along at a moderate walking pace. They are capable of moving faster over open ground."

      link
    12. Re:wonderful by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1
      Well, you've made the classic Slashdot budding humorist error. You said something potentially insightful then went for the funny.

      Confuses them every time.

      Next time, just go for the humor. You'll promptly get modded "Troll" most of the time, but just keep working at it.

      You really don't need all those karma points. It's just a game.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    13. Re:wonderful by TropicalCoder · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...When dormant/docile, these tentacles are rooted into the ground and are used to draw nutrients, as with a normal plant. When active ... use[s] these tentacles to propel themselves along at a moderate walking pace

      Mod parent up +5 Insightful! - and read his post. He has even properly linked his authoritative source.

    14. Re:wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are the counterpart for plants to grow. What moves plants to grow in different regions? What gives them carbon dioxide to breathe? What feasts on our flesh after things die? Any mutualistic thing involving them is to our benefit though. Most our medicines come from various plant chemicals. But if your refering to humans eventually looping around the food chain that is a possibility I guess.

    15. Re:wonderful by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      So someday there will green skinned chicks sunbathing their way to ever better levels of physical fitness? The day I see that, I'm totally changing my name to James T. Kirk. But how will you know when they've gone off ?
    16. Re:wonderful by firatcanbasarir · · Score: 1

      ...even the most sedentary programmer is still thinking... Considering the amount of shitty software around us, I'd doubt that.
    17. Re:wonderful by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1
      Quoth wiki, in case anyone got excited:

      The triffid is a highly venomous fictional species
      --
      :x
  2. What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by aliquis · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So? It will raise peoples metabolism? For what purpose? To waste even more resources on producing food? Waste more land area, water, energy, artificial fertilizers, greenhouse gases, kill more oceans? Yeah, great! And in the end that will probably mean less food for the poor and higher food prices aswell.

    And what say the fat people won't eat even more when they use this? And you don't get the benefits of cardiovascular training or weight lifting either.

    Simply useless, not to say really stupid!

    What are needed aren't more stimulants or excuses, eat for performance not for pleasure and lift your fucking ass!

    (Exception being people who really have some form of medical condition which make their metabolism or body not work as intended, but those people are probably very rare, if there even are any.)

    1. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by Elbow+Macaroni · · Score: 1

      If they fed people like they feed dogs and cats it would be a lot harder to get fat. Two bowls of dry food a day and water.

      --
      -------------------------------------
      Technically, we are beyond survival.
    2. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      Got a chip on your shoulder? Sounds as if fat kids used to (still?) beat you up.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    3. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now with flavour!

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    4. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by moderatorrater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps he's a fat person who hates himself for being so fat? Judging from the site he's posting on and the hate that he's spewing for no apparent reason, I'm going to guess that he's 25, has the mentality of a 15 year old, lives in his mother's basement and gets told how dirty and sinful he must be to have so much weight.

      But those are just guesses. Who knows, maybe I'm being optimistic :D

    5. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by joshtheitguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is why someone needs to invent Bachelor Chow already and no substitutions I want exactly how it is in Futurama.

    6. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by David+Munch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So? It will raise peoples metabolism? For what purpose?

      Metabolism is more than just eating food. Increased metabolism could result in increased energy in the cells, used for, oh lets say athletes? It would be virtually impossible to detect using normal meassures. I can certainly see a benefit for some people.

    7. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone tell police scientist Barry Allen about this in a flash!

    8. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What are needed aren't more stimulants or excuses, eat for performance not for pleasure and lift your fucking ass! Why is that? A fat person who's lazy is going to consume the same amount of resources as a skinnier person who runs. How is food significantly more or less suitable for pleasure than, say, the nintendo DS you mentioned in one of your previous comments? How is it less appropriate than the internet or any other pleasurable pursuit?

      What's funny is that there's plenty of food, the shortfall is mostly due to diverting the food to ethanol and feeding livestock. The biggest obstacle to feeding the poor (arguably the only obstacle) is politics and other, non-food-related problems.

      Exception being people who really have some form of medical condition which make their metabolism or body not work as intended, but those people are probably very rare, if there even are any Wow. Publicly doubting that there are medical conditions that could make someone fat. What a great, insightful comment you make; you're very rational. Next time you make a comment like this, you might as well just scream about how much you hate fat people and leave the environmentalism and poor people out of it.
    9. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by fireboy1919 · · Score: 4, Informative

      So? It will raise peoples metabolism? For what purpose?
      Here's some conditions that occur to me that might be improved by suddenly raising metabolism:
      1) depression
      2) help cure (or recover from) diseases for which the body has an autoimmune response
      3) Rapid weight loss (if, for example, you'll be dead within 10 days if you don't lose 30 pounds within 5 days, which I've heard can come up)
      4) Blood loss recovery

      It should also be noted that pretty much everything that raises metabolism also does something else. Is that something else medically beneficial to someone? Maybe.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    10. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      Cells != people.

      increasing the metabolism of a single cell could save lives and reverse the effects of some diseases. Thankfully, at least for most of us, we are made up of more than one cell.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    11. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but those people are very rare, if there even are any."

      You obviously don't know about Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. For one example.

    12. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, people with fried Thyroids...??
      when your thyroid stops producing enough hormone, your metabolism slows dramatically.

      http://thyroid.about.com/cs/dietweightloss/a/losingweight.htm

    13. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by rts008 · · Score: 1

      As long as it's not like Chuck Wagon :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnwppcD-SMc&feature=related
      Because if that miniature horse and wagon comes ripping through my place, I'll grab my shotgun, then chase it down...and kill it!

      *grumble* Damn mini horse and wagon goes tearing through the place and jumps into the frikkin tv EVERY time I try to sit down and eat! Worse than those telemarketers! *grumble*

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    14. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by Cctoide · · Score: 1

      I'm more concerned about what target those people would switch to if we somehow successfully managed to eradicate obesity.

      --
      "Let's face it, it's a good story. Accuracy would kill it."
    15. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by aliquis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Quite close. I used to be beat up as child, have always been small, am 28, has the mentality of someone much young, live alone, have thought that I was "fat" even thought I wasn't (went down to 54 kg at 173 cm as worst), and kind of still does.

      Still valid points thought.

      I know how I still feel if I have chocolate nearby, I could easily eat the whole bar but I don't because I know it's a bad idea. Some people don't think so it seems. Most of my food is very boring and I don't feel an urge to eat lots of it, but I try to eat enough because I know I need it.

      If I would just eat what I feelt like eating I would lose weight. But as I said most people don't eat because they need to, they eat because.. well.. they have nothing else to do atm and the food is available.

    16. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by owlnation · · Score: 1

      and the first customers will be... Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens.

    17. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I thought about that part aswell, but in another subject. But since I didn't knew how the drug worked I didn't mentioned anything about it.

      But if it raises mitochondia activity they will burn more fuel, but that will probably end up with more free radicals, more oxidizing damage and eventually earlier cell/person death. So this drug may eventually kill you prematurely.

      May help them, may not. For explosive work you use ATP and not carbohydrates, for less explosive work the acidity may stop you instead, depending on of there is enough oxygen available or not. And so on.

      What says it will be impossible to measure? Most drugs used for cheating gets possible to detect by time, and many of them are quite "biological", just look for really high concentration of the enzymes in question. Sure it may not stop everyone, but most.

    18. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by aliquis · · Score: 1
      Why is what? Why they should move themself? To consume more energy of course. Thought it's more effecient to just eat less, but I had that covered aswell.

      Extra fat weight don't use much extra energy at all, even extra muscle doesn't use that much extra energy while resting. The fat will be like say 1-2 kcal / kg or something, it won't help you in a way which matters in rest. Sure it will use more energy to move all that weight, so if the fat person starts moving it will makes a difference, but then really fat people often don't move that much or fast or explosive so I don't know how much difference it makes. The amount of muscle and cardiovascular condition probably set the limit for how much energy you can consume in an amount of time. Not how much you weight.

      Food are less suitable for someone who are already fat because it will make them even fatter, that was really hard to see was it? If they consume the energy I have no problem whatsoever with it. (Except it wastes planetary resources, but I don't care that much about it.)

      I know there are lots of food, and possible to make more, but imho the less the affect the planet the better. So if we would consume less food, areal, water, energy and so on the better. Even if we can do it or not.

      Exception being people who really have some form of medical condition which make their metabolism or body not work as intended, but those people are probably very rare, if there even are any

      Wow. Publicly doubting that there are medical conditions that could make someone fat. What a great, insightful comment you make; you're very rational. Next time you make a comment like this, you might as well just scream about how much you hate fat people and leave the environmentalism and poor people out of it. I know there are some medical conditions which probably actually makes your body a problem, and not your mind, but for most people it's probably not a medicial condition, if it was how come so many more people have gotten it the last years? There are just to easy to get lots of cheap, good, energy dense food. And the problem with possible medical conditions are that many people will probably find an excuse in them.
    19. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by aliquis · · Score: 1

      All valid responses, a few questios thought:
      1) how?
      3) I doubt it will make such a difference, 13.6 kg of body fat would hold approximately 95.200 kcal, so you would need to raise your metabolism by 20.000 kcal / day to reach that goal .. Also with treating food like something we need to eat to survive and not something we eat because it's fun those people would probably not need to take such drastic measurements.

    20. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by geekoid · · Score: 1

      First paragraph: Bunch of strawman arguments

      Second paragraph: Clearly you don't unsderstand eating and food availability.

      "Simply useless, not to say really stupid!"
      Great arguement, it doesn't even knock over your strawman!

      "What are needed aren't more stimulants or excuses, eat for performance not for pleasure and lift your fucking ass!"

      Yeah....exept you are over looking the fact that going on a diet with will take years to loose weight, this could make it a shorter time.

      You should check into reality once is a while and at least try to understand what the hell you are taking about. Jeez eat a donut and shut the hell up.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    21. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I used to be beat up as child, have always been small, am 28, has the mentality of someone much young, live alone, have thought that I was "fat" even thought I wasn't (went down to 54 kg at 173 cm as worst), and kind of still does.

      Holy unstable tense/perspective/conjugation, Batman!

    22. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      1) Depends on the cause of the depression. Its sometimes linked to metabolism in some ways.

      3) Yeah...but sometimes every calorie counts.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    23. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      So? It will raise peoples metabolism? For what purpose? To waste even more resources on producing food? Waste more land area, water, energy, artificial fertilizers, greenhouse gases, kill more oceans? Yeah, great! And in the end that will probably mean less food for the poor and higher food prices aswell.

      I take it you believe in the butterfly effect? THe way I see it this may even itself out. Turn up the metabolish and the cells die faster which means you die faster. You may use up the same amount of resources but just faster. The only issue is how to replenish resources faster than we do now and fast enough on a mass scale if this is applied to humans.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    24. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      No. If you are maintaining a stable (but high) weight, even a 100-kcal reduction on your daily intake will cause a net weight loss.

      Raising your metabolism by 20,000 kcal/day would likely cause you to consume your fat, muscles, and die of starvation within a fortnight.

      I think you underestimate the power of the processes that we use internally.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    25. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by mpeskett · · Score: 1

      There's enough grain produced in the world to feed every person on the planet a sufficient number of calories.

      Unfortunately, very little of it is produced in the places where people are starving, there's a lot of wastage, and there are people who eat many times more food than they need to.

      The solution: Round up obese people and feed them to the third world. Soylent Green for all!

    26. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by aliquis · · Score: 1

      A reasonable weight loss are 0.5 kg / week so 26 kg in a year. Fast weight loss suck because it makes you lose more muscle.

      Intresting that my post have fallen from +4 insightful to 0 flamebait.

    27. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by aliquis · · Score: 1

      And the easiest way to get into a negative energy balance are to just consume less energy.

    28. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I don't know what the butterfly effect is.

      I don't know if it's 100% proved and fact to say that raised metabolism makes the cells die faster, but looking at free radicals and what happens to rats if you starve them it seems likely.

      But then people do die for other reasons when cells not being able to split any more aswell. (Thought cancer risks may raise aswell I guess.)

      The question is if exercise makes you live longer or not, I guess it depends on the intensity and volume (and drugs ..), also if you eat more chances are you consume more antioxidants.

    29. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I know it will, but he said 13.6 kg bodyfat in 5 days. 100 kcal reduction won't make that happen.

      And I didn't said 20.000 kcal was a good idea, but it is what is needed to lose all that fat.

    30. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      To waste even more resources on producing food? Waste more land area, water, energy, artificial fertilizers, greenhouse gases, kill more oceans?

      I don't know what the butterfly effect is.

      You listed all the effects that increasing cell metabolism would do with one of them being killing more oceans. It isn't quite the butterfly effect which says that a single butterfly flapping wings in one part of the world can cause a hurrican in another part. With your theory multiple cells (in one body with multiple bodies having this done) having their metabolism increased would eventually kill oceans. I find it far fetched just as I do the butterfly effect.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    31. Re:What a stupid anti-fat drug this can become by aliquis · · Score: 1

      We are already killing the life in the oceans. Higher metabolism = require more food = even less fish in the oceans. Not very hard to understand?

      The steps from butterfly to hurricane are probably bigger .. If at all existing.

  3. Waste of energy... by Daniel+Weis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I see this as very interesting commentary on the human persona. We consume energy which is of extreme importance and complain of its excessive cost whilst we abuse it. We then expend more precious energy to figure out ways to use more energy in an inefficient manner to trick our bodies into no longer storing the energy for later dire straights.

    The fundamental basis of this idea is flawed. I personally don't get it.

    However, it is certainly marketable and will cause someone to be filthy rich if they can really force humans to expend more energy without doing anything that actually requires the energy (such as exercise).

    But I digress, all that aside, the pure discovery is interesting.

    1. Re:Waste of energy... by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      What is flawed about going, "Hey I have wealth. I want to be able to consume food that taste good, and not have to put any effort into working off the excess energy that my body is storing form that food."

      Sure, a bicycle could get us from point A to B. A Geo Metro could too. But we have SUV's and Sports car's because we want them, not because we need them.

      A fundamental part of living, is enjoying life.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    2. Re:Waste of energy... by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The fundamental basis of this idea is flawed."
      Pretty bold statement for someone who doesn't get it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Waste of energy... by Paxtez · · Score: 1


          I think what the GP was trying to relay is the inherent irrationality of the research.

          If you think of the human body as a machine that obeys the laws of thermodynamics, a "good" (as in high) metabolism is just the subject using more energy than is needed. Being efficient is a good thing for everyone. Decrease in human used energy == less food eaten == less food grown/transported == less time used growing/transport == more time to do something else.

          Frankly attaching tiny weights to every cell in your body to make it work harder to do the same thing is just stupid. It is like (queue car metaphor) purposely scoring the pistons/valves in your engine so you get fewer MPG.

          Yes, I know we need science like this. I'm all for science, I just think it is sad that we can do amazing things like this, yet we can't discover a simple way to put the burger down.

    4. Re:Waste of energy... by Walter+Carver · · Score: 1

      It's a point of pshycology. These people want to consume because it gives them pleasure. But they don't want to get fat. I guess the human mind doesn't function with the laws of efficiency :-P

    5. Re:Waste of energy... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      If you feel that guilty about being alive and consuming energy as a human being, you could always free some up for people who actually like themselves and enjoy life.

      You know what to do...

  4. This could lead to great things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real trick is to get the artificial organelles to copy themselves when the host cell splits, in the same way that mitochondria or plastids function.

  5. ...fluorescent chemicals? by pushing-robot · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thank you, researchers. The world really needed a metabolism-enhancing enzyme that turns you green.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:...fluorescent chemicals? by catdevnull · · Score: 1

      Apparently green is in...

      Fake bake orange is out.

      --

      I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  6. Other Uses by MrMunkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is /. so I suppose reading the article isn't a given. There are other uses than just for increasing the metabolism. Other uses include targeting cancerous cells specifically, giving lactose intolerant people enzymes in their stomachs, and making your skin do photosynthesis so you don't even have to eat. They're all theories around the new "NanoReactor" they created for delivering their payloads. I'm assuming that increasing the metabolism was the easiest test to perform in a dish.

    1. Re:Other Uses by jmdc · · Score: 1

      ...making your skin do photosynthesis... I for one, welcome our new green-skinned overlords.
    2. Re:Other Uses by __aabvlw4075 · · Score: 1

      The confusion is how the word metabolism is used in the media and popular culture. Metabolism is the sum total of all chemical reactions occurring in the body. All of the cool possibilities for this technology that you just listed from the article are exactly what the article says they are "upgrades" to the human metabolism. This has nothing to do with increasing the overall rate of systemic cellular metabolism (thereby increasing energy consumption, and possibly weight loss). This is about altering the metabolic processes of specific cells for specific ends.

  7. Re:What you're saying is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol, HIV is such a waste of time. Once they cure Cardiovascular disease, then I will be impressed. Plus, creating florescent cells has been around for many many years.

  8. Re:What you're saying is by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now how about they do something useful like killing the HIV? It killed my mom, my dad, my uncle, my brother, my great great aunt, my PlayStation, and my dog. I think maybe you should get yourself tested. And by the way, that's not really the way you're supposed to "play" with your PlayStation. Or your mom, dad, uncle, brother, great great aunt, and dog for that matter.
  9. Hmm... by digitrev · · Score: 1

    Seems like great science work. However, I'm a bit worried about the potential applications. If/when this process becomes cheap, I can just see this becoming permanent make-up.

    --
    Cynical Idealist
    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can just see this becoming permanent make-up. Those are called tattoos.
  10. Re:What you're saying is by nawcom · · Score: 0

    So basically what you are saying is that we have the technology to make humans glow in the dark without using nuclear waste. It is about damn time. Now how about they do something useful like killing the HIV? It killed my mom, my dad, my uncle, my brother, my great great aunt, my PlayStation, and my dog. I have a solution to stop your little HIV issue from spreading: STOP STICKING YOUR FUCKING DICK INTO EVERY HOLE YOU FIND! I for one, would appreciate if you started telling people that you have HIV ahead of time.
  11. Re:I for one by Eudial · · Score: 1

    Could have at least, for a change, put some more effort into it. Something small, like citing more of the dialog in question goes a long way.

    "And I for one welcome our new florescent, metabolically enhanced overlords. I'd like to remind them that as a trusted slashdot personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves."

    (Cells use sugar for energy,... right?)

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  12. What the paper really claims by xplenumx · · Score: 5, Informative
    Tamsin Osborne, who wrote the NewScientistTech article, certainly didn't understand the original article and focused on sensationalism rather than scientific accuracy.

    The original paper did not increase the metabolism of the macrophage. What the original paper did was encage an enzyme, trypsin, in a "nanometer-sized polymer vesicle". This vesicle was coated with a protein that induce macrophages to engulf the vesicle (which is what macrophages do - they phagocytose). The authors then incubated macrophages which contained the vesicles with a dye (BZiPAR) that fluoresces (emits a wavelength of light - in this case green) when treated with trypsin (trypsin cuts of parts of the BZiPAR that suppress fluorescence).

    We already know how to non-genetically introduce proteins to cells, for example using liposomes or the tat-peptide approach. What makes this work interesting is that the polymer vesicle is more stable than liposomes and, unlike the other methods, the vesicles don't release their content into the cell. Instead, the cell's components have to enter into the polymer vesicle.

    This is an interesting technical development. It is not, however, everything that Mr. Osborne makes it out to be.

    1. Re:What the paper really claims by mpitten · · Score: 1

      I can't read the original journal article (boo hoo poor student speaking here) but I'm assuming you're telling us what the original article said - so thank you very very much for that.

      I'm a bit confused by the conflation of "organelles" and "vesicles" in the original article though, I assume they're only producing artificial polymer vesicles and not making entire Golgi apparatus or endoplasmic reticulum or something like that.

      I have two questions:

      Would it be correct to assume that this sort of treatment (inserting enzymes) is more likely to have tangible, significant effects on the body when performed on babies/young children? I imagine you have to treat a lot of cells in adults (and hope they replicate?) in order for your enzymes to have an effect on a tissue...
      Also what are some specific benefits of using vesicles that require cell components to *enter* (rather than digest the membrane) instead of releasing them normally? I'm a bit curious.

      --
      mpitten FTW.
    2. Re:What the paper really claims by lysse · · Score: 1

      I believe that'd be Ms Osborne, there not being many boys in England called Tamsin.

  13. Don't eat for pleasure, eat for performance! by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Cats are supposed to regulate their food intake well, atleast that's what the food bags says, thought mine is fat. I've tested to not give her that much food but her complaints are annoying so she just tend to always have food in her bowl.

    Anyway I think one of the biggest problem are that people don't see and eat food for functionality, but rather for pleasure. They don't eat to get the nutrition and energy they need for the day, they eat because they like it, it tastes good and makes them feel good.

    But to take coffee and some snack because you have a break at work, that cola you have beside your desk just because you like it, serve and eat food for hours when the family meet, eat up everything in your lunchbox because it happened to be there, take a treat because you wanted it, eat because you are bored, and so on suck. Fluid foods are even worse because it's so easy to consume vast amounts of them and they are normally just consumed for taste alone, to add juice and soda to your meal just raise the energy consumtion even further but it doesn't feel like you are eating something.

    Eat because you need it and nothing else. Find something else to make you happy and feel good for doing. Do some workouts, have sex, give someone a hug, watch a good movie, do your hobbies, whatever suits you.

    Also haven't the population of planet earth raised from like 1 billion to over 6 billion in 100 years? Even if there are food for everyone or possible to make it while using even more space there will indeed be a problem if and when the population keeps expanding at this rate, 36 billion people 2100? We already have a fish fleet 5 times to large and all the fish people eat now will be exterminated by 2040 if I remember correctly. Thinks like our european eels have droped in numbers a lot and they live long, I think they got sexually mature late and the amount of them reaching europe have accordingly to wikipedia droped 90, maybe even 98% since the 70s! How long will it take for all those fishes to come back to the old volumes? Is it even likely? Will we really stop fish them? I doubt it... Especially since the fleet are just so big and many people will refused to stop and people want food.

    Which btw gives me the right to say that omnivore humans suck ;D, vegan as I am ;D (Cattle meat lets out lots of greenhouse gases during the whole production line/live aswell. Chicken are much better, but I think it's very cruel with chicken production. Eat your tofu instead ;D, or even better beans and lentils.)

    Anyway, considering how fast the population grow, how fat people already are, how much food are probably wasted thought refining into more precious food and animal products, do we really need something which let people eat even more?!!?! We are already affecting all other life on the planet way to much, please don't let us spread and invade it even more. It would be so much better if we where only 500 million or something, that's a lot of humans anyway, just compare it to the amounts of all other primates :/

    We need to die, fast! Maybe we can let out some chemicals which makes most of us infertile, to bad it will probably affect other animals aswell.

    1. Re:Don't eat for pleasure, eat for performance! by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Find something else to make you happy and feel good for doing.

      I got fired from my last job for doing that. And it's kinda' messy.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    2. Re:Don't eat for pleasure, eat for performance! by brainnolo · · Score: 1

      Why should one give up the pleasure of eating? Is a cheap and easy way to give yourself a really good time (only second to sex). Thinking about "the big picture" is good and all, but we should really live to feel happy, and if you aren't the kind of person that feels happy being a smartass, easy stuff like food, sex and partying will usually do the trick.
      BTW: I'm fit, so I'm not trying to justify my overweight status.

    3. Re:Don't eat for pleasure, eat for performance! by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      I find it surprising that someone with such idiotic opinions can write so much.

  14. Interesting Development by Guppy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Something like this has been recognized to occur in certain cancers, through Oncosomes. In such cases, the cancerous cells bud off vesicles which fuse with healthy cells, containing oncoproteins that induce a cancer-like phenotype in the target cell, despite no change in the healthy cell's genotype.

    Anyway, I find this interesting. While restricted to situations where you could physically make the delivery, it raises the possibility of obtaining (temporarily) effects similar to those of gene-therapy without the gene. By producing your target protein ex vivo you eliminate an entire class of problems revolving around how to introduce and express foreign DNA.

  15. Stimulant? by AdamPee · · Score: 1

    I mean, on one hand it's interesting, but on the other hand, won't a good healthy helping of amphetamines do the same thing?

  16. Higher metabolism! by benhattman · · Score: 1

    Great! In addition to artificially creating cancer (see asbestos, nanotubes, smoking, nuclear fission, tanning booths, cell phones, etc.) we can now create artificial cancer.

    Cancer by the way is when a cell begins growing and dividing uncontrollably. Such cells have a higher metabolism.

  17. Mod parent up! by funkboy · · Score: 1

    I love it when people know what they're talking about :-)

  18. Re:I for one by nawcom · · Score: 0

    Now that I love!

  19. Re:I for one by Hojima · · Score: 1

    You can't mine sugar, it's grown. Douche bag.

  20. Re:I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You just keep telling yourself that while you're down in the cave, mining sugar.

  21. Re:I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BTW I was JK about the douche bag thing

  22. Re:What you're saying is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one, would appreciate if you started telling people that you have HIV ahead of time. I told you that condoms save lives. But did you listen, oh no....
  23. Funding by quantaman · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Swiss Researchers also wish to extend their thanks to the two main sponsors of the research, Major League Baseball and the US Olympic Team.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  24. Uncoupling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Increasing the metabolism is actually very easy. There are natural uncoupling proteins in the respiratory chain, lowering its efficiency and increasing the amount of input required for the same energy output. The same effect can be achieved by the use of other substances, including alcohol

    It does however, lead to increased sweating, which is probably bad enough as it is with many basement dwellers...

  25. I've seen this one already by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

    Hey come on now. I've seen this one already. Then they can't eat fast enough to keep up with their super metabolism and their nerves kinda take a beating too and then when they're in the middle of a goa'uld ship, their body can't take it anymore and they risk failing the mission. Come on, who can't see that coming? Sci fi shows are here to warn us, people! Like the Jetsons telling us we're all gonna have to live in the sky if the sea level rises and we'll all have dishwashers and vending machines!

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  26. please invent bacteria GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    otherwise who knows what the hell will happen

  27. Ob. Blade Runner quote by hack++slash · · Score: 1

    "The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long. And you have burned so very very brightly, Roy."

    --
    To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
  28. Re:I for one by kehren77 · · Score: 1

    HA! I always love it when the first post is rated -1 Redundant. It's like a paradox.

  29. Brought to you by..... by kehren77 · · Score: 1

    the Umbrella Corporation.

    Serious sounds like a great idea. What could possibly go wrong?

  30. Movement in cells by alanejackson · · Score: 1

    Why turn bird eggs? The theory of Magnetrition says, this need to be moved is a requirement throughout the life of all warm blooded animals. The movement is seen happening/taking place as a result of a survival instinct, diminishable with age, until now. Magnetrition points out movement of the warm blooded cell is required to keep a magnetically migrating organelle moving and thus performing its rule in the microscopic biological structure. Plants need photosynthesis. CHLOROPLASTS ARE PHOTOTACTIC. Are the mitochondria magnetotactic? Do warm-blooded animals need "Magnetosynthesis"?

    --
    Alan, Search + Share ~ Magnetrition, http://www.freewebs.com/alanejackson/index.htm
    1. Re:Movement in cells by alanejackson · · Score: 1

      Magnetosynthesis - Something you didn't know you were doing! Now do it better! As people become aware of the fact, that the many cells of their body require movement in relation to a magnetic field, many will begin to realize the benefits of insuring such movement, with things like rocking chairs and cradles. It's time to take a step back, to where wisdom once was. Are you over the age of 10? If you set up a camera, and recorded yourself during a nights sleep, would you be found moving less than you did last year? Every year? Can learning why a bird's egg must be turned during incubation double life expectancy in humans? Learn how to prevent osteoporosis, just the way children do? Research indicates, magnetic bacteria and the mitochondria have the same properties. The average person dies around age 70 due to insufficient turning during sleep. Astronauts, when they leave the Earth's magnetic field, must take with them a copy of the Earth's magnetic field, and insure their periodic movement within that field.

      --
      Alan, Search + Share ~ Magnetrition, http://www.freewebs.com/alanejackson/index.htm